K183474 · Carestream Health, Inc. · MQB · Jan 16, 2019 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K183474
Device Name
Carestream DRX-1 System with DRX Core Detectors
Applicant
Carestream Health, Inc.
Product Code
MQB · Radiology
Decision Date
Jan 16, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 892.1680
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The device is intended to capture for display radiographic images of human anatomy including both pediatric and adult patients. The device is intended for use in general projection radiographic applications wherever conventional screen-film systems or CR systems may be used. Excluded from the indications for use are mammography, fluoroscopy, and angiography applications.
Device Story
System captures conventional projected x-rays using flat panel digital detectors; transforms x-ray energy into digital images via scintillator technology; images displayed on system console monitor for clinical review; used in clinical settings by radiology staff; output supports diagnostic decision-making; benefits include improved imaging performance and workflow efficiency compared to screen-film or CR systems.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing and phantom imaging study performed. Phantom study used 30 paired acquisitions (adult/pediatric) comparing investigational CsI scintillator detector to predicate GOS scintillator detector. Three expert observers evaluated image quality (detail, contrast, sharpness, noise) on a 5-point scale. Results demonstrated statistical equivalence in image quality despite 30% lower exposure for the investigational device. No unique artifacts identified.
Technological Characteristics
Flat panel digital radiography system; utilizes CsI scintillator detectors (DRX Core 3543C, 4343C, 4343FC); integrates with Eclipse II image processing software; connectivity via digital network; compliant with IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, and IEC 62321 standards.
Indications for Use
Indicated for capturing radiographic images of human anatomy in pediatric and adult patients for general projection radiography. Excludes mammography, fluoroscopy, and angiography.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stationary x-ray system is a permanently installed diagnostic system intended to generate and control x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). A radiographic contrast tray or radiology diagnostic kit intended for use with a stationary x-ray system only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
Predicate Devices
Carestream DRX-1 System with DRX Plus 3543 Detectors (K150766)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA acronym and name on the right. The FDA part of the logo is in blue and includes the words "U.S. Food & Drug Administration".
January 16, 2019
Carestream Health, Inc. % Ms. Carolyn Wagner Director Regulatory Affairs, Clearance & Surveil. 150 Verona Street ROCHESTER NY 14608
Re: K183474
Trade/Device Name: Carestream DRX-1 System with DRX Core Detectors Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1680 Regulation Name: Stationary x-ray system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MQB Dated: December 14, 2017 Received: December 17, 2018
Dear Ms. Wagner:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.htm); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for Robert Ochs, Ph.D. Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Please wait...
If this message is not eventually replaced by the proper contents of the document, your PDF viewer may not be able to display this type of document.
You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader for Windows®, Mac, or Linux® by visiting http://www.adobe.com/go/reader_download.
For more assistance with Adobe Reader visit http://www.adobe.com/go/acrreader.
Windows is either a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Mac is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other countries.
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Carestream
### "K183474 510(k) Summary"
| 510(k) Owner Name:<br>510(k) Owner Address: | Carestream Health, Inc.<br>150 Verona Street<br>Rochester, New York 14608 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) Owner Phone:<br>510(k) Owner Fax: | 585-627-6588<br>585-627-8802 |
| Contact Person & Info: | Carolyn L Wagner<br>Director Regulatory Affairs, Clearance & Surveillence<br>Carolyn.wagner@carestream.com<br>585-627-6588 |
| Date Summary Prepared: | January 15, 2019 |
| Device Trade Name:<br>Device Common Name:<br>Classification Name: | Carestream DRX-1 System with DRX Core Detectors<br>Flat Panel Digital Imager<br>Stationary x-ray system |
| Device Class:<br>Device Code:<br>Regulation Number: | Class II<br>MQB<br>21 CFR 892.1680 |
| Predicate Device: | Carestream DRX-1 System with DRX Plus 3543<br>Detectors<br>Manufactured by: Carestream Health, Inc.<br>510(k) No.: K150766 (June 24, 2015)<br>Classification Regulation: 21 CFR 892.1680<br>Classification Name: Stationary x-ray system<br>Primary Product Code: MQB |
#### Device Description:
Carestream Health, Inc. is submitting this Special 510(k) premarket notification for a modification to the cleared Carestream DRX-1 System with DRX Plus 3543 Detectors (K150766). The product will be marketed as the Carestream DRX-1 System with DRX Core Detectors.
Consistent with the original system, the Carestream DRX-1 System with DRX Core 3543 Detectors are flat panel digital imagers utilizing a stationary digital radiography (DR) x-ray system.
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Indications for Use
"The device is intended to capture for display radiographic images of human anatomy including both pediatric and adult patients. The device is intended for use in general projection radiographic applications wherever conventional screen-film systems or CR systems may be used. Excluded from the indications for use are mammography, fluoroscopy, and angiography applications."
The Indications for Use for the subject device is the same as for the predicate device and the intended use remains unchanged. Any variation in features or technical specifications have been identified and addressed through testing (described below) to support a substantial equivalence determination.
#### Intended Use
The intended use for this device, as determined by descriptions and the proposed labeling contained in this submission, is similar to the Indications for Use statement provided above. We believe that the Carestream DRX-1 System with DRX Core Detectors and the predicate device have the same intended use.
#### Comparison of Technological Characteristics:
Based upon information provided within this submission. we believe that the Carestream DRX-1 System with DRX Core Detectors is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed Carestream DRX-1 System with the DRX Plus 3543 Detectors (predicate device) (K150766). Both the currently marketed DRX Plus 3543 Detectors and the new DRX Core Detectors are used in combination with the image processing software (Eclipse II: K180809) and user interface resident on the DRX-1 System Console component of the Carestream DRX-1 System.
The system is used to directly capture conventional projected x-rays to generate digital images. regardless of which detector is being used. An image can be displayed on a preview monitor for viewing with any of the detectors. The system can transmit diagnostic images through a digital network for diagnostic viewing and printing regardless of which detector is used.
The Carestream DRX Core 3543C, DRX Core 4343C and DRX Core 4343FC Detectors (investigational devices) are similar to the FDA cleared DRX Plus 3543 Detector (predicate device) except for the scintillator (new supplier change for the CSI scintillator) and same or larger size, with all other aspects of the design remaining the same.
Based upon information provided within this submission, we believe that the Carestream DRX-1 System with DRX Core Detectors is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed Carestream DRX-1 System with DRX Plus 3543 Detectors (K150766).
#### Discussion of Testing
#### Bench Testing
The performance characteristics and operation / usability of the Carestream DRX-1 System with DRX Core Detectors were evaluated in non-clinical (bench) testing. These studies have
{5}------------------------------------------------
demonstrated the intended workflow, related performance, overall function, shipping performance, verification and validation of requirements for intended use, and reliability of the system including both software and hardware requirements. Non-clinical test results have demonstrated that the device conforms to its specifications. Predefined acceptance criteria were met and demonstrated that the device is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as or better than the predicate device.
In addition to the bench testing described above, the performance of the Carestream DRX-1 System with DRX Core 3543C Detector (investigational) was evaluated against the predicate device in a phantom imaging study. The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality between the investigational and predicate devices using anthropomorphic phantoms.
Because detector performance was well characterized by laboratory data, the following information was not necessary to demonstrate substantial equivalence but provides additional support that the device works as intended:
A set of anthropomorphic phantoms (adult and pediatric) were used to perform paired acquisitions using the investigational and predicate devices. Thirty image pairs were obtained using a DRX-Evolution stationary x-ray system. The Beam Detect feature was used in half of the acquisitions for both predicate and investigational detectors. Due to intrinsic differences in the efficiencies of the scintillator materials, the GOS (predicate) panel was operated at 30% higher exposure than the CsI panel to facilitate an appropriate image quality comparison. The improved imaging performance of the CsI panel was verified based on a comparison of DQE and MTF to the predicate.
Exam types included adult and pediatric chest, shoulder, clavicle, upper and lower extremities. and adult skull. The exams were acquired according to the phantom imaging protocol developed for this study. Three expert observers (former radiographic technologists with extensive experience in resolving image quality related service issues) evaluated images in a blinded pairwise study on a PACS system. Image quality attributes of detail contrast, sharpness and noise were evaluated using a 5 point preference scale.
Any artifacts present in the resultant images were evaluated as part of the image comparison and no unique artifacts associated with either detector were evident. Dust or debris was observed in several exams on both the predicate and investigational images suggesting that dirt or contamination was under or on the phantom during acquisition. Since it was common in images from both detectors, such artifacts were deemed inconsequential.
#### Conclusion
The average preference for all image quality attributes (detail contrast, sharpness and noise) demonstrates that the image quality of the investigational device (exposed with 30% less exposure) is the same as that of the predicate device. The two-sample equivalence tests confirm that the beam detect mode has no effect on preference.
#### Summary
The statistical test results and graphical summaries generated by the phantom study results demonstrate that the DRX Core 3543C Detector (investigational device) delivers images that are equivalent in quality when compared with images obtained using the commercially available DRX Plus 3543 Detector (predicate device).
{6}------------------------------------------------
Results of the Phantom Reader Study indicated that the image quality of the modified Carestream DRX-1 System with DRX Core 3543C Detector is statistically equivalent to or better than that of the DRX Plus 3543 Detector (predicate device).
#### IEC Consensus Standards and FDA Guidance Documents
The Carestream DRX-1 System with 3543C Core Detector was tested and found compliant to the following consensus standards:
IEC 60601-1: Medical electrical equipment—Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance
IEC 60601-1-2: Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances - Reguirements and tests
IEC 62321: Electrotechnical products – Determination of levels of six regulated substances (lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, polybrominated biphenvls, polybrominated diphenyl ethers)
The following FDA Guidance Documents were followed in preparation of this 510(k) submission:
"Guidance for the Submission of 510(k)s for Solid State Imaging Devices" "Pediatric Information for X-ray Imaging Device Premarket Notifications"
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.