K183202 · Ge Medical Systems, LLC · JAK · Apr 12, 2019 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K183202
Device Name
Deep Learning Image Reconstruction
Applicant
Ge Medical Systems, LLC
Product Code
JAK · Radiology
Decision Date
Apr 12, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.1750
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
AI/ML, Real-World Evidence, Pediatric
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K183202 · Apr 12, 2019
Deep Learning Image Reconstruction
Ge Medical Systems, LLC
Retrospectively collected clinical cases
Retrospective clinical cases were used in a reader study to compare image quality between the proposed device and the predicate device (ASiR-V) across various anatomical regions.
The Deep Learning Image Reconstruction option is a deep learning based reconstruction method intended to produce cross-sectional images of the head and whole body by computer reconstruction of X-ray transmission data taken at different angles and planes, including Axial, Helical (Volumetric), and Cardiac acquisitions, for all ages. Deep Learning Image Reconstruction can be used for head, whole body, cardiac, and vascular CT applications.
Device Story
Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) is a software-based image reconstruction method for CT scanners. It takes raw X-ray transmission data as input and uses a dedicated Deep Neural Network (DNN) to reconstruct cross-sectional images. The device is integrated into the scanner's existing raw data-based reconstruction chain. It produces DICOM-compatible images branded as 'TrueFidelity™ CT Images'. Users select from three reconstruction strengths (Low, Medium, High) based on clinical needs. The device is used in clinical settings by radiologists and technologists. The output images are used for diagnostic assessment of head, body, cardiac, and vascular anatomy. By leveraging deep learning, the device aims to provide image appearance similar to traditional Filtered Back Projection (FBP) while maintaining the performance benefits of ASiR-V, such as noise reduction, improved low-contrast detectability, and artifact suppression, ultimately aiding clinicians in diagnostic decision-making.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical reader study using 60 retrospective cases. 9 board-certified radiologists (3 per specialty: body/extremity, head/neck, cardiac/vascular) independently evaluated images reconstructed with ASiR-V vs. DLIR. Readers used a 5-point Likert scale to assess diagnostic image quality and compared image noise texture, sharpness, and homogeneity. Results confirmed diagnostic quality and equivalence to the predicate.
Technological Characteristics
Software-based image reconstruction using a dedicated Deep Neural Network (DNN). Integrated into existing CT scanner raw data reconstruction chain. Supports Axial, Helical, and Cardiac acquisition modes. DICOM compatible output. Developed under ISO 13485 and 21 CFR 820 quality systems.
Indications for Use
Indicated for head, whole body, cardiac, and vascular CT image reconstruction in patients of all ages.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A computed tomography x-ray system is a diagnostic x-ray system intended to produce cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data from the same axial plane taken at different angles. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which consists of the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
GE Medical Systems, LLC. % Lee Bush Regulatory Affairs Manager 3000 N. Grandview Blvd. WAUKESHA WI 53188
Re: K183202
Trade/Device Name: Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1750 Regulation Name: Computed tomography x-ray system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JAK Dated: March 14, 2019 Received: March 15, 2019
Dear Lee Bush:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for
April 12, 2019
{1}------------------------------------------------
devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.html); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Michael D. O'Hara
For
Thalia Mills, Ph.D. Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K183202
Device Name Deep Learning Image Reconstruction
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Deep Learning Image Reconstruction option is a deep learning based reconstruction method intended to produce cross-sectional images of the head and whole body by computer reconstruction of X-ray transmission data taken at different angles and planes, including Axial, Helical (Volumetric), and Cardiac acquisitions, for all ages.
Deep Learning Image Reconstruction can be used for head, whole body, cardiac, and vascular CT applications.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span>☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)</span> </div> | <div> <span>☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)</span> </div> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for General Electric (GE). The logo is a blue circle with the letters "GE" in a stylized, cursive font in the center. The circle is surrounded by three swirling shapes, also in blue, that give the impression of movement or energy. The logo is simple, clean, and recognizable, and it is often used to represent the company's brand and identity.
#### 510(k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVNESS K183202
This 510(k) summary of Safety and Effectiveness information is submitted in accordance with the requirement of 21 CFR Part 807.87(h):
| Date: | November 16, 2018 |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Submitter: | GE Medical Systems, LLC<br>3000 North Grandview Blvd<br>Waukesha, WI 53188 |
| Primary Contact: | Lee Bush<br>Regulatory Affairs Manager<br>Phone 262-309-9429<br>Email: Lee.Bush@ge.com |
| Secondary Contacts: | John Jaeckle<br>Chief Regulatory Affairs Engineer<br>GE Healthcare<br>Tel: 262-424-9547<br>Email: john.jaeckle@ge.com |
| Device Trade Name: | Deep Learning Image Reconstruction |
| Device Classification | Class II |
| Regulation Number/<br>Product Code: | 21 CFR 892.1750 Computed tomography x-ray system / JAK |
| Primary Predicate Device Information | |
| Device Name: | ASIR-V |
| Manufacturer: | GE Medical System SCS (d.b.a GE Healthcare) |
| 510(k) Number: | K133640 cleared on March 25, 2014 |
| Regulation Number/<br>Product Code: | 21 CFR 892.1750 Computed tomography x-ray system / JAK |
| Secondary Predicate Device Information | |
| Device Name: | Revolution CT |
| Manufacturer: | GE Medical System SCS (d.b.a GE Healthcare) |
| 510(k) Number: | K163213 cleared on December 16, 2016 |
| Regulation Number/<br>Product Code: | 21 CFR 892.1750 Computed tomography x-ray system / JAK |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the General Electric (GE) logo. The logo consists of the letters 'GE' in a stylized script, enclosed within a blue circle. There are also some white swirls around the circle.
### Device Description
Deep Learning Image Reconstruction is an image reconstruction method that uses a dedicated Deep Neural Network (DNN) that has been designed and trained specifically to generate CT lmages to give an image appearance, as shown on axial NPS plots, similar to traditional FBP images while maintaining the performance of ASiR-V in the following areas: image noise (pixel standard deviation), low contrast detectability, high-contrast spatial resolution, and streak artifact suppression.
The images produced are branded as "TrueFidelity™ CT Images". Reconstruction times with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction support a normal throughput for routine CT.
Deep Learning Image Reconstruction was trained specifically on the Revolution CT family of systems (K163213, K133705). The deep learning technology is integrated into the scanner's existing raw data-based image reconstruction chain to produce DICOM compatible "TrueFidelity™ CT Images".
The system allows user selection of three strengths of Deep Learning Image Recon: Low, Medium or High. The strength selection will vary with individual users' preferences and experience for the specific clinical need.
As compared to the primary predicate device, the intended use of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction does not change (head and whole body CT image reconstruction). Both algorithms are designed to produce cross-sectional images of the head and body by computer reconstruction of X-ray transmission data taken at different angles and planes, including Axial, Helical (Volumetric), and Cardiac acquisitions for all ages.
#### Intended Use
The Deep Learning Image Reconstruction option is intended for head, whole body, cardiac, and vascular CT scans.
#### Indications for Use
The Deep Learning Image Reconstruction option is a deep learning based reconstruction method intended to produce cross-sectional images of the head and whole body by computer reconstruction of X-ray transmission data taken at different angles and planes, including Axial, Helical (Volumetric), and Cardiac acquisitions, for all ages.
Deep Learning Image Reconstruction can be used for head, whole body, cardiac, and vascular CT applications.
#### Comparisons
The GE Deep Learning Image Reconstruction option is substantially equivalent to existing reconstruction options including the primary predicate device, ASiR-V reconstruction option. Because both reconstruction options (Deep Learning Image Reconstruction and ASiR-V) are implemented on the secondary predicate, Revolution CT family (K163213, K133705), they utilize the same hardware and software platform technology on which substantial equivalency is
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the General Electric (GE) logo. The logo consists of the letters 'GE' in a stylized, cursive font, enclosed within a circular frame. The frame has decorative swirls or flourishes around the letters. The logo is colored in a shade of blue, with a white outline around the letters and the frame.
demonstrated. The table below summarizes the substantive feature/technological differences between the predicate device and the proposed device:
| Specification/ | ASiR-V | Deep Learning Image Reconstruction |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Attribute | (Predicate Device, K133640) | (Proposed Device) |
| Technology | Extensive system statistical<br>model | Utilizes a dedicated Deep Neural<br>Network (DNN) which is trained on the<br>CT Scanner and designed specifically to<br>generate high quality CT images |
| System statistics -<br>Noise modeling of<br>the data collection<br>imaging chain<br>(photon noise and<br>electronic noise) | Characterization of the photon<br>statistics as it propagates<br>through the preprocessing and<br>calibration imaging chain | Same |
| System statistics -<br>Noise characteristics<br>of the reconstructed<br>images | The characterization of the<br>scanned object using<br>information obtained from<br>extensive phantom and clinical<br>data | Utilizes a trained Deep Neural Network<br>(DNN) which models the scanned<br>object using information obtained from<br>extensive phantom and clinical data |
| Clinical Workflow | Select recon type and strength<br>(percentage) | Select recon type and strength (High,<br>Medium, Low) |
Deep Learning Image Reconstruction does not introduce any new risks/hazards, warnings, or limitations.
#### Determination of Substantial Equivalence
#### Summary of Non-Clinical Testing
Deep Learning Image Reconstruction has successfully completed the design control testing per our quality system. No new hazards were identified, and no unexpected test results were obtained. Deep Learning Image Reconstruction was designed under the Quality System Regulations of 21CFR 820 and ISO 13485. GE believes that the extensive bench testing performed, and the physician evaluation are sufficient for FDA's substantial equivalence determination.
The following quality assurance measures have been applied to the development of the system:
- Risk Analysis
- Required Reviews
- Design Reviews
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for General Electric (GE). The logo consists of the letters "GE" in a stylized script, enclosed within a blue circle. The circle is surrounded by a series of curved lines, resembling water droplets or stylized flourishes, also in blue. The logo is simple, recognizable, and has been used by GE for many years.
- Software Development Lifecycle
- Testing on unit level (Module verification)
- Integration testing (System verification)
- . Performance testing (Verification)
- Safety testing (Verification)
- . Simulated use testing (Validation)
The testing and results did not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness than associated with predicate device. We consider the proposed device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device ASIR-V.
The substantial equivalence is also based on the software documentation for a "Moderate" level of concern device
# Additional Non-Clinical Testing
Engineering bench testing was performed to support substantial equivalence and the product performance claims. The evaluation and analysis used the identical raw datasets obtained on GE's Revolution CT and then applies the Deep Learning Image Reconstruction or ASiR-V reconstruction (hence the dose (CTDIvol) is identical for both). The resultant images were then compared for:
- . Low Contrast Detectability (LCD) using the head and body MITA/FDA low contrast phantoms and a model observer
- 트 lmage Noise (pixel standard deviation) using both head and body uniform phantoms
- 트 High-Contrast Spatial Resolution (MTF) using a quality assurance phantom with a small diameter tungsten wire surrounded by water inside the phantom to generate the point spread function
- . Streak Artifact Suppression using an oval uniform polyethylene phantom with embedded high attenuation objects to produce the artifacts
- 트 Spatial Resolution, longitudinal (FWHM slice sensitivity profile)
- . Low Contrast Detectability/resolution (statistical)
- 트 Noise Power Spectrum (NPS) and Standard Deviation of noise
- 트 CT Number Uniformity
- CT Number Accuracy
- I Contrast to Noise (CNR) ratio
- 트 Artifact analysis – metal objects, unintended motion, truncation
## Clinical Testing
The reader study used a total of 60 retrospectively collected clinal cases. The raw data from each of these cases was reconstructed with both ASiR-V and Deep Learning Image
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/0 description: The image shows the General Electric (GE) logo. The logo consists of the letters 'GE' intertwined within a blue circle. There are decorative water droplet-like shapes surrounding the circle, giving it a distinctive and recognizable appearance.
Reconstruction and presented side by side to each reader independently. The results of the study support substantial equivalence and performance claims.
These images were read by 9 board-certified radiologists with expertise in the specialty areas that align with the anatomical region of each case. Each image was read by 3 different radiologists who provided an assessment of image quality related to diagnostic use according to a 5-point Likert Scale. Three readers read the cases primarily covering body and extremity anatomy, three different readers read the cases primarily covering head/neck anatomy, and three different readers read the cases primarily covering cardiac/vascular.
Additionally, the readers were asked to compare directly the ASIR-V and Deep Learning Image Reconstruction images according to three key metrics of image quality preference – image noise texture, image sharpness, and image noise texture homogeneity.
A final evaluation of low contrast and small lesions in the abdominal and pelvis region by a board-certified radiologist confirmed that the images produced are of diagnostic quality.
#### Substantial Equivalence
The changes associated with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction do not change the Indications for Use from the primary predicate, and represent equivalent technological characteristics, with no impact on control mechanism, operating principle, and energy type.
Deep Learning Image Reconstruction was developed under GE Healthcare's quality system. Design verification, along with bench testing and the clinical reader study demonstrate that Deep Learning Image Reconstruction is substantially equivalent and hence as safe and as effective as the legally marketed predicate device. GE's quality system's design, verification, and risk management processes did not identify any new hazards, unexpected results, or adverse effects stemming from the changes to the predicate.
Based on development under GE Healthcare's quality system, the successful verification testing, the additional engineering bench testing, and the clinical reader study, GE Healthcare believes that Deep Learning Image Reconstruction is substantially equivalent to the predicate device and hence is safe and effective for its intended use.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.