K183064 · Innovasis, Inc. · MAX · Jun 28, 2019 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K183064
Device Name
TxTi IBF System
Applicant
Innovasis, Inc.
Product Code
MAX · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jun 28, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3080
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Innovasis TxTi IBF System is an intervertebral body fusion device intended to stabilize a spinal segment to promote fusion using bone graft, in order to restrict motion and decrease pain. Users of these products are limited to physicians trained in orthopedic surgery. Clinical locations include hospitals and surgery sites equipped to perform spinal surgery.
Device Story
The TxTi IBF System is a 3D-printed intervertebral body fusion implant used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgeries. The device features a honeycomb structure with an open interior cavity for autograft packing to promote bone through-growth; a tapered leading edge facilitates insertion; anti-migration surface features engage vertebral endplates to prevent expulsion. The implant is used by orthopedic surgeons in hospital or surgical settings to stabilize spinal segments, restrict motion, and reduce pain in patients with degenerative disc disease. It is intended for use with supplemental internal spinal fixation systems. The device is provided with reusable instrumentation in custom sterilization trays.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance testing conducted per ASTM F2077-17 and F2267-04, including static and dynamic axial compression, static and dynamic compression shear, subsidence, and expulsion testing. Results demonstrate mechanical performance equivalent to predicate devices.
Technological Characteristics
Implant material: Titanium-6-Aluminum-4-Vanadium ELI alloy (ASTM F3001). Instruments: 465 Stainless Steel (ASTM F899), 17-4 Stainless Steel (ASTM F899), Silicone, Radel (ASTM D6394). Sterilization trays: Anodized 5052 Aluminum, Polypropylene, Radel. Design: 3D-printed honeycomb structure with open cavity, tapered leading edge, and anti-migration surface. Energy source: None (mechanical). Connectivity: None.
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous lumbar levels (L2-S1), defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration confirmed by history and radiography. Patients must have failed at least 6 months of non-operative treatment. May include up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis. Used with internal supplemental spinal fixation (e.g., Innovasis Excella) and packed with autograft via transforaminal approach.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
*Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required.* Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
{0}------------------------------------------------
June 28, 2019
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health and Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Innovasis, Inc. Marshall McCarty Director QA/RA 614 East 3900 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84107
Re: K183064
Trade/Device Name: TxTiTM IBF System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MAX Dated: May 24, 2019 Received: May 28, 2019
Dear Mr. McCarty:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmp/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see
{1}------------------------------------------------
https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for Melissa Hall Assistant Director DHT6B: Division of Spinal Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
#### K183064
Device Name TxTi™ IBF System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Innovasis TxTi Transforaminal Lumbar IBF System is an intervertebral body fusion device for use in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels of the lumbar spine (L2-S1). DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment. In addition, these patients may have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). These implants are used to facilitate fusion in the lumbar spine and are placed via a transforaminal approach.
This device is intended to be used with internal supplemental spinal fixation systems such as the Innovasis Excella® Spinal System. The interior of the implant is intended to be packed with autograft.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> </div> | <div> <span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> </div> |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Innovasis. The logo is in black and white and features the word "INNOVASIS" in a bold, sans-serif font. Below the word "INNOVASIS" is the phrase "INNOVATE / INVOLVE / INVENT" in a smaller, sans-serif font. The logo is simple and modern, and the use of black and white gives it a clean and professional look.
#### 510(k) Summary Report: 5.0
# TxTi™ IBF System
| Company: | Innovasis, Inc.<br>614 E. 3900 South<br>Salt Lake City, UT 84107 |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
- Marshall C. McCarty Contact: Phone: (801) 261-2236 mmccarty@innovasis.com
- Trade Name: TxTi™ IBF System
Common Name: Intervertebral Fusion Device with Bone Graft
- Regulation No.: 21CFR 888.3080 Classification: Class: 2 Product Code: MAX Review Panel: Orthopedic
Primary Predicate Device: K180078 Innovasis TxHA® PEEK IBF System This predicate has not been subject to a design-related recall.
- K162496 Add'I Predicate Device: CoreLink Foundation™ 3D Interbody This predicate has not been subject to a design-related recall.
- Device Description: The Innovasis TxTi IBF System is an intervertebral body fusion device with associated instrumentation for use in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) surgeries. The implants are 3D printed.
The single use implant devices feature a honeycomb structure with an open cavity in the interior geometry to accommodate bone graft and maximize bone through-growth, with anti-migration surface to engage the vertebral endplates and prevent expulsion. The implants have a slightly convex profile and are offered in a variety of different sizes to fit the anatomical needs of a wide variety of patients. The implant has a tapered leading edge which aids in implant insertion due to limited anatomical space. Reusable instruments to support TLIF surgeries are provided with the implants in custom sterilization trays.
- Performance Data: (Non-clinical)—Performance testing per ASTM F2077-17 and F2267-04 for Static Axial Compression, Dynamic Axial Compression, Static Compression Shear, Dynamic Compression
{4}------------------------------------------------
| INNOVASIS<br>INNOVATE / INVOLVE / INVENT | TxTi™ IBF System | 510(k)<br>November 2, 2018 |
|------------------------------------------|------------------|----------------------------|
|------------------------------------------|------------------|----------------------------|
Shear, Subsidence and Expulsion testing indicates that the TxTi IBF is substantially equivalent to the predicates.
Materials:
Implants
- Titanium-6-Aluminum-4-Vanadium ELI (Extra Low ● Interstitial) Alloy per ASTM F3001
Instruments
- . 465 Stainless Steel per ASTM F899
- 17-4 Stainless Steel per ASTM F899 ●
- Silicone Handles (Tested for biocompatibility)
- Radel Handle per ASTM D6394 .
Sterilization Trays
- Anodized 5052 Aluminum ●
- . Polypropylene
- Radel .
The Innovasis TxTi IBF System is an intervertebral body fusion Intended Use: device intended to stabilize a spinal segment to promote fusion using bone graft, in order to restrict motion and decrease pain.
> Users of these products are limited to physicians trained in orthopedic surgery. Clinical locations include hospitals and surgery sites equipped to perform spinal surgery.
Indications for Use: The Innovasis® TxTi™ Transforaminal Lumbar IBF System is an intervertebral body fusion device for use in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels of the lumbar spine (L2-S1). DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment. In addition, these patients may have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). These implants are used to facilitate fusion in the lumbar spine and are placed via a transforaminal approach.
> This device is intended to be used with internal supplemental spinal fixation systems such as the Innovasis Excella® Spinal System. The interior of the implant is intended to be packed with autograft.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Innovasis. The logo is black and white and features the word "INNOVASIS" in a bold, sans-serif font. Below the word "INNOVASIS" are the words "INNOVATE / INVOLVE / INVENT" in a smaller, sans-serif font. The logo is simple and modern.
## Basis for Substantial Equivalence:
The TxTi IBF System has been subjected to risk analysis, engineering analysis and testing to recognized standards and has been shown to be substantially equivalent to the predicate devices, K180078 Innovasis TxHA® PEEK IBF System and K162496 CoreLink Foundation™ 3D Interbody.
- Technology is substantially equivalent. —
- -Design is substantially equivalent.
- Sizes are substantially equivalent. -
- -Mechanical strength is substantially equivalent.
- Indications for use are substantially equivalent. -
- -Bone graft window/cavity is substantially equivalent.
- -Materials (biocompatibility profile) are substantially equivalent.
- Conclusion: The conclusions drawn from the nonclinical tests demonstrate that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.