ArgenZ Liguids are intended to be used by trained dental technicians as an accessory for shading ArgenZ frameworks and ArqenZ all-zirconia, monolithic restorations for anterior and posterior dental prosthetics.
Device Story
ArgenZ Liquids are dilute aqueous solutions containing transition and lanthanoid metal salts (e.g., Co, Cr, Er, Fe, Mn, Pr, Ni, Bi, Nd). Used by dental technicians in a laboratory setting to shade ArgenZ zirconia frameworks and monolithic restorations prior to sintering. The liquids are applied to the zirconia material to achieve desired tooth shades. The process does not involve automated analysis or software; it is a manual coloring technique. The resulting shaded restoration is intended for use in anterior and posterior dental prosthetics, providing aesthetic benefits to the patient by matching natural tooth color.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data. Performance evaluated via mechanical properties (flexural strength) and chemical solubility per BS EN ISO 6872:2015. Biocompatibility evaluated via ISO 10993-5 MEM Elution Test; all test articles showed no evidence of cell lysis or toxicity (reactivity grade ≤ 2).
Technological Characteristics
Aqueous solutions of transition and lanthanoid metal salts. Physical properties: pH 6.5-7.5, boiling point 100°C, specific gravity 1.0-1.10 g/cm^3. Non-sterile. Applied manually to zirconia substrates. Complies with BS EN ISO 6872:2015 for flexural strength and chemical solubility.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use by trained dental technicians as an accessory for shading ArgenZ frameworks and all-zirconia monolithic restorations for anterior and posterior dental prosthetics in adult patients.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Porcelain powder for clinical use is a device consisting of a mixture of kaolin, felspar, quartz, or other substances intended for use in the production of artificial teeth in fixed or removable dentures, of jacket crowns, facings, and veneers. The device is used in prosthetic dentistry by heating the powder mixture to a high temperature in an oven to produce a hard prosthesis with a glass-like finish.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health and Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
The Argen Corporation Craig Jolicoeur Quality & Regulatory Manager 5855 Oberlin Drive San Diego, California 92121
February 8, 2019
Re: K182833
Trade/Device Name: Argen Z Liquids (ArgenZ Liquid Shade, ArgenZ Incisal Effect, ArgenZ Pontic Reducer, and ArgenZ Color Modifier) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.6660 Regulation Name: Porcelain Powder For Clinical Use Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: EIH Dated: November 16, 2018 Received: November 16, 2018
Dear Craig Jolicoeur:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.htm); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Digitally signed by Mary S. Mary S. Runner -S3 Runner - S3 Date: 2019.02.08 10:01:37 -05'00'
For Tina Kiang, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K182833
#### Device Name
ArgenZ Liquids (ArgenZ Liquid Shade, ArgenZ Incisal Effect, ArgenZ Pontic Reducer, and ArgenZ Color Modifier)
Indications for Use (Describe)
ArgenZ Liquids are intended to be used by trained dental technicians as an accessory for shading ArgenZ allzirconia, monolithic restorations for anterior and posterior dental prosthetics.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
_ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
#### FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
{3}------------------------------------------------
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/8 description: This image is a document that appears to be a 510(k) Summary with the number K182833. It indicates that it was submitted by The Argen Corporation, located in San Diego, CA. The contact person is Craig Jolicoeur, and the date prepared is 9/28/2018. The trade names include ArgenZ Liquid Shade, ArgenZ Incisal Effect, ArgenZ Color Modifier, and ArgenZ Pontic Reducer, with a common name of ArgenZ Liquids, classification name of Porcelain powder for clinical use (21 CFR 872.6660), classification of Class II, and product code of EIH.
Legally marketed devices for which our organization is claiming substantial equivalence:
| 510(k)<br>Number | Trade Name | Manufacturer |
|------------------|---------------------------|--------------|
| K111257 | HEISENBERG DYEING LIQUIDS | 3M ESPE AG |
### Device Description:
ArqenZ Zirconia Coloring Liguids are dilute aqueous solutions of transition and lanthanoid metal salts used in combination with ArgenZ Zirconia material (K071410 and K150919) to properly shade teeth. Elements, which may include (but are not limited to) Co, Cr, Er, Fe, Mn, Pr, Ni, Bi, and Nd are combined with water to result in the finished product.
### Intended Use:
ArgenZ Liguids are intended to be used by trained dental technicians as an accessory for shading ArgenZ frameworks and ArqenZ all-zirconia, monolithic restorations for anterior and posterior dental prosthetics.
Predicate devices: K111257
{5}------------------------------------------------
# Performance Data:
The raw materials and manufacturing process used in the fabrication of ArgenZ Liquids are similar to the materials and processes used in the industry to fabricate the predicate device. Section 18 contains test records of parent materials and representative accessories infused into the parent materials. The results demonstrate compliance with the product standard of the parent material.
# Performance Data Summary:
# Summary of mechanical properties to the product standard (BS EN ISO 6872:2015)
| Product | Flexural strength<br>[MPa] from standard<br>minimum value for | Test Result |
|---------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
| | mean | |
| ArgenZ HT+ | 800 | 1230 |
| ArgenZ HT+ Shaded with ArgenZ HT Liquid (A4) | 800 | 1223 |
| ArgenZ Anterior | 500 | 868 |
| ArgenZ Anterior Shaded with ArgenZ ST Liquid (A3) | 500 | 765 |
| ArgenZ Anterior Shaded with ArgenZ ST Liquid (C4) | 500 | 963 |
### Summary of chemical properties to the product standard (BS EN ISO 6872:2015)
| Product | Chemical solubility<br>[ug/cm²] | Test Result |
|---------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|-------------|
| ArgenZ HT+ | <100 | 4.16 |
| ArgenZ HT+ Shaded with ArgenZ HT Liquid (A4) | <100 | 4.16 |
| ArgenZ Anterior | <100 | 20.80 |
| ArgenZ Anterior Shaded with ArgenZ ST Liquid (A3) | <100 | 10.32 |
| ArgenZ Anterior Shaded with ArgenZ ST Liquid (C4) | <100 | 8.30 |
# Predicate Device Comparison (Liquid):
| | ArgenZ Liquids | HEISENBERG DYEING LIQUIDS |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Properties and Information | | |
| 510(k) | N/A | K111257 |
| Indications for Use | ArgenZ Liquids are intended to be<br>used by trained dental technicians as<br>an accessory for shading ArgenZ<br>frameworks and ArgenZ all-zirconia,<br>monolithic restorations for anterior and<br>posterior dental prosthetics. | Liquid ceramic aid for complete or<br>partial coloring of all zirconium<br>oxide blanks intended to be used<br>for all ceramic dental restorations |
| Prescription Use | Prescription Only | Prescription Only |
| Target Population | General, mostly adults | General, mostly adults |
| Type of Packaging | Liquid container | Liquid container |
| Method of Manufacturer | Batch, at VITA shade | Batch, at VITA shade |
| Packaging Volume (mL) | 30 and 100 | 100 and 250 |
| VITA Shade | 16 | 16 |
| Items in Product Line | ~ 90 | ~50 |
| Storage Conditions | 2 years @ 25-75°C | 3-4 years at 4-10°C |
| General Physical Form | Liquid | Liquid |
| Specific Physical Form | Liquid | Liquid |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Odor | Characteristic odor | Characteristic odor |
|---------------------|---------------------|---------------------|
| Color | Yellow/orange | Yellow/orange |
| pH | 6.5-7.5 | 6.5-7.5 |
| Boiling Point | 100°C | 100°C |
| Specific Gravity | 1.0-1.10 g/cm^3 | 1.00-1.10 g/cm^3 |
| Solubility in Water | 100% | 100% |
| Sterility | Non-sterile | Non-sterile |
#### Summary of the biological testing conducted on the device:
The device was evaluated for cytotoxicity based on ISO 10993-5 (Section 8.2) using the Minimal Essential Media (MEM) Elution Test. According to the criteria described in Table 1 (Section 8.5), a reactivity grade of greater than 2 (mild reactivity) is considered a cytotoxic effect.
#### Test Requirements & Rationale for Cytotoxicity
Test articles for the cytotoxicity testing were selected as representative samples for each product family, and determined to be worst case scenarios for potential biocompatibility issues. Specified zirconia materials will be used as a medium for testing the products.
Table 1, shows the rationale used to determine which sample set would represent the entire product category. Since direct testing using the overlay method will be employed to determine cytotoxicity of the samples, indirect testing will not be necessary.
| Liquids | Shade | Elements Present | Rationale |
|------------------|-------|------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Type | | | |
| ST on<br>K150919 | A3 | Er Fe Ni | Highest Er |
| ST on<br>K150919 | C4 | Mn Fe Ni | Mn presence, highest<br>presence of Ni |
| HT on<br>K071410 | A4 | Cr Fe | Highest concentration<br>of elements |
| HT on<br>K071410 | B4 | Pr Fe Cr | Pr presence, Cr<br>presence |
Table 1: Rationale for liquid sample selection
All tests articles showed no evidence of causing any cell lysis or toxicity. All test articles met the requirements of the test since the grade was less than or equal to grade 2 (mild reactivity).
Complete test reports are available in Section 15 of this submission.
Conclusion: Due to the lack of response, the products are considered biocompatible and substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
In addition, strong evidence supporting biocompatibility of the material can be seen when comparing chemical solubility results from the white and shaded materials.
{7}------------------------------------------------
# Conclusion:
The proposed and predicate devices are composed of a similar material makeup. All devices have similar indications for use.
The proposed and predicate devices have similar properties.
The performance results and technical characteristics support the findings of substantial equivalence.
We are claiming substantial equivalence of the ArgenZ Liquids to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.