MyoStrain software is an image processing device that post-processes strain-encoded (SENC) images, which are acquired by MRI systems equipped with a SENC pulse sequence. MyoStrain software receives SENC images from MRI storage and archives, and performs extraction of time-resolved, quantitative strain information per voxel and other cardiac measurements, viewing, image manipulations, communications, and printing. Available measurements include longitudinal and circumferential strain to quantitatively describe the wall motion of the heart. Tools are provided to display regional motion properties of the heart. A report interface is provided. Measurement tools provide information that can be output in standardized or specialized report formats. This interface makes it possible to quickly and reliably fill out of complete clinical report of a cardiac imaging exam with strain. The results of the measurement tools are interpreted by the physician and can be communicated to referring physicians to support the determination of a diagnosis.
Device Story
MyoStrain 5.1 is standalone software for Windows-based PCs; processes DICOM-format SENC MRI images; extracts time-resolved, quantitative strain information per voxel; calculates cardiac measurements including longitudinal/circumferential strain, ejection fraction, and volumes. Used by trained clinicians/technicians in clinical settings; inputs SENC images from MRI archives; outputs visual reports with color-coded values and numbers for physician interpretation. Assists in cardiac diagnosis by quantifying myocardial deformation; enables rapid, reproducible assessment of heart wall motion. Replaces manual analysis with automated SENC processing; provides standardized reporting for referring physicians.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical study required. Bench testing included: phantom analysis for strain accuracy (LOA -5 to +5); verification of global measurements (LVEF, EDV, ESV, SV, Mass) against reference device (Diagnosoft VIRTUE) using N=23 subjects; correlation coefficients (R) for EF (0.79), EDV (0.84), ESV (0.94), SV (0.31). All metrics met pre-defined acceptance criteria.
Technological Characteristics
Standalone software; Windows 7, 8.1, or 10; utilizes MR tagging pulse sequences to generate spatial modulation of magnetization; computes longitudinal and circumferential strain; DICOM compatible; no hardware components (biocompatibility/EMC not applicable).
Indications for Use
Indicated for post-processing of strain-encoded (SENC) MRI images to extract time-resolved, quantitative cardiac strain information and measurements (longitudinal/circumferential strain, ejection fraction, volumes) to assist physicians in diagnosing cardiac wall motion and function.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A magnetic resonance diagnostic device is intended for general diagnostic use to present images which reflect the spatial distribution and/or magnetic resonance spectra which reflect frequency and distribution of nuclei exhibiting nuclear magnetic resonance. Other physical parameters derived from the images and/or spectra may also be produced. The device includes hydrogen-1 (proton) imaging, sodium-23 imaging, hydrogen-1 spectroscopy, phosphorus-31 spectroscopy, and chemical shift imaging (preserving simultaneous frequency and spatial information).
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). A magnetic resonance imaging disposable kit intended for use with a magnetic resonance diagnostic device only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo features the letters 'FDA' in a blue square, followed by the words 'U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION' in blue text.
Myocardial Solutions % Ms. Linda Horne Regulatory Affairs Specialist 3000 RDU Center Drive, Suite 117 MORRISVILLE NC 27560
February 14, 2019
Re: K182756
Trade/Device Name: MyoStrain 5.1 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1000 Regulation Name: Magnetic resonance diagnostic device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LNH Dated: January 15, 2019 Received: January 16, 2019
Dear Ms. Horne:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for
{1}------------------------------------------------
devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.html; good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Michael D. O'Hara
For
Robert Ochs, Ph.D. Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K182756
Device Name
MyoStrain 5.1
Indications for Use (Describe)
MyoStrain software is an image processing device that post-processes strain-encoded (SENC) images, which are acquired by MRI systems equipped with a SENC pulse sequence. MyoStrain software receives SENC images from MRI storage and archives, and performs extraction of time-resolved, quantitative strain information per voxel and other cardiac measurements, viewing, image manipulations, communications, and printing. Available measurements include longitudinal and circumferential strain to quantitatively describe the wall motion of the heart. Tools are provided to display regional motion properties of the heart.
A report interface is provided. Measurement tools provide information that can be output in standardized or specialized report formats. This interface makes it possible to quickly and reliably fill out of complete clinical report of a cardiac imaging exam with strain. The results of the measurement tools are interpreted by the physician and can be communicated to referring physicians to support the determination of a diagnosis.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(K) SUMMARY
# Myocardial Solutions MyoStrain® (per 21CFR 807.92)
## I. SUBMITTER
Myocardial Solutions Inc. 3000 RDU Center Drive Suite 117 Morrisville, NC 27560
Telephone: 919-459-9102 Fax: 919-882-1815
Contact Person: Linda Horne Date Prepared: September 26, 2018
## II. DEVICE
Name of Device: MyoStrain 5.1 Common or Usual Name: MyoStrain Classification Name: Magnetic resonance diagnostic device (21 CFR 892.1000) Regulatory Class: II Product Code: LNH
### III. PREDICATE DEVICE
Harp 2.06 marketed by Diagnosoft, Inc., K100352 This predicate has not been subject to a design-related recall
Reference Device Virtue marketed by Diagnosoft, Inc. K111833 This reference device has not been subject to a design related recall
{4}------------------------------------------------
## IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Myocardial Solutions Myostrain is software that runs on Windows-based operating systems to view and analyze SENC MR images of the heart in DICOM format. MyoStrain quantifies regional and global cardiac function from SENC images by implementing the SENC processing methods. With a friendly graphic user interface, users are able to analyze SENC MR images and obtain fast and reproducible measurements of myocardial strain, ejection fraction, and volumes. Measurements are collected presented on screen as a report showing values as colors and numbers, and this report can be printed or exported in digital format.
## V. INDICATIONS FOR USE
MyoStrain software is an image processing device that post-processes strain-encoded (SENC) images, which are acquired by MRI systems equipped with a SENC pulse sequence. MyoStrain software receives SENC images from MRI storage and archives, and performs extraction of time-resolved, quantitative strain information per voxel and other cardiac measurements, viewing, image manipulations, communications, and printing. Available measurements include longitudinal and circumferential strain to quantitatively describe the wall motion of the heart. Tools are provided to display regional motion properties of the heart. A report interface is provided. Measurement tools provide information that can be output in standardized or specialized report formats. This interface makes it possible to quickly and reliably fill out of complete clinical report of a cardiac imaging exam with strain. The results of the measurement tools are interpreted by the physician and can be communicated to referring physicians to support the determination of a diagnosis.
The indications for Use statement for MyoStrain is not identical to the predicate device: however, the difference do not alter the intend use of the device nor do they affect the safety and effectiveness of the device relative to the predicate. Both the subject and predicate devices have the same intended use for the diagnosis of cardiac issues by analyzing cardiac MRIs.
### VI. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
The technological principle for the subject and the predicate device is based on the use of the same feature of MR tagging to generate temporary spatial modulation of magnetization in the tissue. These MR tagging deforms with contraction and relaxation of the myocardium and can, therefore, be used to track and quantify the deformation. Both the subject and predicate device measure deformation in the form of cardiac strain computed from the MRI images. At a high level, the subject and predicate devices use the following same technological elements:
- MR Tagging Pulse Sequences: Both uses images acquired by MRI pulse sequences . based on MR Tagging
- Produce measurements of strain, specifically the longitudinal and circumferential strains ●
- Use of a Standalone computer system running Windows 7, 8.1 or 10 ●
The following technological difference exist between the subject and the predicate devices:
- The subject has the MR Tagging planes parallel to the imaging slice, therefore producing ● what is called strain-encoded (SENC) MRI images, while predicate device uses MR Tagging orthogonal to the imaging plane
{5}------------------------------------------------
- The subject measures the strain in the through-plane direction, while the predicate device measures it in the in-plane directions.
- . The SENC images used in the subject device are acquired in as fast as one heartbeat acquisition, which is much faster than typical MR Tagging acquisition used in the predicate device.
## VII. ACCURACY OF MYOSTRAIN MEASUREMENTS
The accuracy of MyoStrain measurements are determined by the Limit of Agreement (LOA). The LOA is the range that covers the 95% of differences between the measurement of the two devices. For example, if MyoStrain measures LVEF of 67%, the LOA of (-13,+10) means that 95% for a large number LVEF values of the same subject measured using the gold standard Cine MRI will lie between 54% and 77%. The LOA depends on many factors, including images quality and inter-operator and inter-observer variabilities. This LOA was originally based on two predicate devices (Diagnosoft HARP for Strain, Diagnosoft VIRTUE for traditional measurements), however these ranges have been reduced to reflect measured accuracy in MyoStrain.
To demonstrate the accuracy of MyoStrain measurements, we calculated the correlation coefficients using Diagnosoft VIRTUE 5.51 measurements of the LV EF, End-Diastolic Volume (EDV), End-Systolic Volume (ESV), Mass, and Stroke Volume (SV). We considered the measurements accurate by requiring that the variations in global measurements due to workstation and user variability to be within the accepted cutoffs of published guidelines and clinical results. We specified that targeted correlation coefficients of the global measures generated by MyoStrain, in comparison to the gold standard cardiac MRI, must be equal or better than the following: EF: R=0.79, p<0.001, EDV: R=0.84, p<0.001, ESV: R=0.94, p<0.001, SV: R=0.31, p=0.05.
Since the LV Mass is similar to LV volumes, we decided that the R and p values follow the same criteria for EDV. Our acceptance criteria required the following bounds for the 95% range of measurements differences between MyoStrain and Diagnosoft VIRTUE:
- LVEF: (-20,+20) ●
- LVEDV: (-45,+45)
- LVESV: (-25,+25) ●
- LVSV: (-40, +40)
- LVMass: (-35, +35)
Based on a sample size N=23 of healthy subjects and patients, MyoStrain demonstrated the following acceptable LOA:
- LVEF: (-13,+10)
- LVEDV: (-40,+35)
- LVESV: (-19,+21) ●
- LVSV: (-36,+29) ●
- LVMass: (-19,+30) ●
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Figure/0 description: The image contains four Bland-Altman graphs, each displaying the limits of agreement (LOA) for different cardiac measurements. The first graph shows the LOA for LVEF, with values ranging from -13 to 10. The second graph shows the LOA for LVMass, with values ranging from -19 to 30. The third graph shows the LOA for LVEDV, with values ranging from -40 to 35, and the fourth graph shows the LOA for LVESV, with values ranging from -19 to 21.
## The Bland-Altman Graphs of these calculations can be seen below:
Image /page/6/Figure/2 description: This image is a Bland-Altman graph of SV. The x-axis ranges from 0.0 to 120.0, and the y-axis ranges from -40.0 to 40.0. There are several data points scattered across the graph, with a horizontal line near the 0.0 mark and two more at the 30.0 and -40.0 marks.
SV Limits of Agreement (LOA) is (-36,29)
{7}------------------------------------------------
The LOA and accuracy of Strain calculations were based on tests using a mechanical phantom with known actual strain values. Phantom analysis demonstrated that MyoStrain has the acceptable LOA of (-5,+5). Note that LOA of MyoStrain measured in vivo in humans is unknown could be different.
The aforementioned accuracies of measurements are associated with images that were correctly acquired and analyzed by trained operators. It is the responsibility of the trained MRI operator and MyoStrain users to check the quality of the acquired images before post-processing them using MyoStrain.
## VIII. PERFORMANCE TESTING
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
### Software Verification and Validation
Software verification and validation testing was provided to demonstrate safety and efficacy of the proposed device. This includes a hazard analysis, where the potential hazards have been classified as a moderate level of concern (LOC). The reported documentations include:
- Software Device Description ●
- Hazard Analysis ●
- Software Requirements Definition (SRD)
- Software Architecture Description
- Software Verification and Validation
- Validation of MyoStrain's Algorithm
- . Verification of Traditional Global Measurements against Reference Device, Diagnosoft VIRTUE
- Verification of Strain measurements against Predicate Device, Diagnosoft HARP ●
- Cyber security Documents .
## Performance Verification
- Integration Testing ●
- GUI and Report Translation ●
- Integration with Philips 5.6 MRI System when reading SENC Images
- Philips Healthcare MR Implementation of the SENC Pulse Sequence
### Biocompatibility
Not Applicable to the proposed device, because the device is stand-alone software.
### Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)
Not Applicable to the proposed device, because the device is stand-alone software.
### Animal Study
No animal study was required. Clinical Studies
{8}------------------------------------------------
No clinical study was required.
## Summary
The features described in this premarket submission are supported with the results of the testing mentioned above. MyoStrain was found to have a safety and effectiveness profile that is similar to the predicate device.
## IX. Conclusion
Based on the similarities in indication for use, design, functional, and operational features MyoStrain has demonstrated substantial equivalence to the listed legally marketed predicate device and any differences do not affect the product's safety or effectiveness.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.