K182328 · True Diagnostics, Inc. · LCX · May 15, 2019 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K182328
Device Name
VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test
Applicant
True Diagnostics, Inc.
Product Code
LCX · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
May 15, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1155
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
VeriClear™ Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test is a rapid chromatographic immunoassay for qualitative detection of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in urine, as an aid in early detection of pregnancy, in some cases as early as five (5) days before the expected period, i.e., as early as six (6) days before the day of the missed period.
Device Story
VeriClear™ Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test is an OTC lateral flow immunochromatographic assay for qualitative hCG detection in urine. Device uses colloidal gold label on a test strip integrated into a plastic housing with electronic/optical components, a microprocessor, and an LCD. User applies urine via stream or dipping for 5 seconds; device processes the immunochemical reaction and displays results as 'YES+', 'NO-', or '?' (error). Battery-powered; results remain on screen until battery depletion. Designed for lay users to interpret pregnancy status without reading colored lines. Provides objective digital readout to assist in early pregnancy detection.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study evaluated 616 urine samples from 56 women (ages 25-43) across conception cycles. Detection rates: 69% at 5 days before expected period, 100% at 1 day before. Lay user study (n=109) demonstrated 100% agreement with professional users for both stream and dipping methods. Specificity study (n=320) across pre-, peri-, and post-menopausal groups showed 0% false-positive rate. Analytical sensitivity is 10 mIU/ml.
Technological Characteristics
Lateral flow immunochromatographic strip; mouse monoclonal anti-hCG antibodies; goat anti-mouse IgG control; battery-powered; LCD display; microprocessor-based digital readout; qualitative detection; 10 mIU/mL LoD; traceable to WHO 4th International Standard for hCG.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of hCG in urine to aid in early pregnancy detection. Intended for over-the-counter (OTC) use by lay users. Can be used as early as 5 days before the expected period (6 days before the missed period).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test system is a device intended for the early detection of pregnancy is intended to measure HCG, a placental hormone, in plasma or urine. A human chorionic goadotropin (HCG) test system is a device intended for any uses other than early detection of pregnancy (such as an aid in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of treatment of persons with certain tumors or carcinomas) is intended to measure HCG, a placental hormone, in plasma or urine.
Predicate Devices
First Response Gold Digital Pregnancy Test (K123567)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT
I 510(k) Number:
K182328
II Applicant:
True Diagnostics, Inc.
III Proprietary and Established Names:
VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test
IV Regulatory Information:
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LCX | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1155 - Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) Test System | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
V Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New Device
B Measurand:
Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG)
C Type of Test:
Qualitative chromatographic immunoassay
K182328 - Page 1 of 11
{1}
VI Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indication for use below.
B Indication(s) for Use:
VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test is a rapid chromatographic immunoassay for qualitative detection of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in urine, as an aid in early detection of pregnancy, in some cases as early as five (5) days before the expected period, i.e., as early as six (6) days before the day of the missed period.
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
OTC - Over The Counter
VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test is intended for over-the-counter (OTC) use.
D Special Instrument Requirements:
None
VII Device Description:
A Device Description:
The VeriClear Digital hCG Early Result Pregnancy Test is a qualitative lateral flow immunoassay for the detection of hCG. Each device is provided in a sealed pouch with instructions for use and a desiccant package to control the moisture during storage. The device may be used in midstream or dip mode (with a user-supplied cup) and consists of a plastic housed test stick containing an immunochromatographic strip and electronic and optical components along with a microprocessor and specific algorithms to digitally display test results. The VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test is powered by a battery and the test results are displayed on the device's liquid crystal display (LCD) as either "YES+" (for a positive result), "NO-" (for a negative result) or "?" (for an invalid result) on the display.
B Principle of Operation:
The VeriClear Digital hCG Early Result Pregnancy Test is a sandwich immunoassay employing mouse monoclonal antibodies specific for hCG, which are immobilized on the membrane as test line, and goat anti-mouse IgG immobilized on the membrane as control line. After the urine specimen is applied to the device, the hCG present in the specimen will react with a mouse anti-hCG monoclonal antibody conjugate. The conjugate complex migrates along the membrane towards the test and control zones. A digital component integral with the chromatographic strip reads and displays the result of the immunochemical reaction on an LCD (Liquid Crystal Display) screen of the device. The test result is shown on the LCD screen of the device. A "YES+" test result indicates that the pregnancy hormone (hCG) was detected, a "NO-" test result indicates that no hCG was detected, and a "?" result indicates an invalid test.
K182328 - Page 2 of 11
{2}
K182328 - Page 3 of 11
C Instrument Description Information:
| Modes of Operation | Yes | No |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device? | ☐ | ☑ |
| Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission? | ☐ | ☑ |
| Software | | |
| FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types: | ☑ | ☐ |
1. Instrument Name: VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test
2. Specimen Identification: Urine
3. Specimen Sampling and Handling: N/A
4. Calibration: N/A
5. Quality Control: N/A
VIII Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s): First Response Gold Digital Pregnancy Test
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s): K123567
C Comparison with Predicate:
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K182328 | K123567 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | Qualitative detection of hCG as an aid in early detection of pregnancy. | Same |
| Early Detection Claim | Detection of pregnancy as early as 5 days before the expected period or as early as 6 | Same |
{3}
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K182328 | K123567 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | days before the day of the missed period. | |
| Test Principle | Lateral flow qualitative immunochromatographi c assay with digital display of the result | Same |
| Sample Matrix | Urine | Same |
| Traceability | WHO 4th International Standards for hCG | Same |
| Limit of Detection | 10 mIU/mL | Same |
| Time to Result | 3 minutes | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| hCG Isoforms Detected | Intact hCG Hyperglycosylated hCG hCG β-subunit | Intact hCG Hyperglycosylated hCG hCG β-subunit hCG β-core fragment |
| Test Result | Digital readout: result show as YES+ (pregnant), NO- (not pregnant) or ? (invalid) | Yes+ = pregnant
No- = not pregnant |
IX Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
None referenced
X Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
A precision study was performed using human urine samples spiked with hCG, traceable to the 4th WHO International Standard to obtain samples with hCG concentrations of 0 mIU/mL, 3 mIU/mL, 5 mIU/mL, 8.5 mIU/mL, 10 mIU/mL, 25 mIU/mL, 50 mIU/mL, and 100 mIU/mL and three lots of VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test devices. Each sample was tested using both simulated midstream and dip methods. The tests were performed over the course of 5 consecutive days by 5 different operators. A total of 150 replicates per testing mode (2 replicates/run x 5 operators x 5 days x 3 lots) were obtained for each hCG concentration tested.
K182328 - Page 4 of 11
{4}
Inter-Lot Reproducibility of VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test Device (Simulated MidStream Method):
| hCG Level (mIU/mL) | Total # of Tests | VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test Device (Simulated Midstream Mode) | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Observed Results Lot 1 | | | Observed Results Lot 2 | | | Observed Results Lot 3 | | |
| | | P (+) | N (-) | % Positive | P (+) | N (-) | % Positive | P (+) | N (-) | % Positive |
| 0.0 | 150 | 0 | 50 | 0% | 0 | 50 | 0% | 0 | 50 | 0% |
| 3.0 | 150 | 0 | 50 | 0% | 0 | 50 | 0% | 0 | 50 | 0% |
| 5.0 | 150 | 0 | 50 | 0% | 0 | 50 | 0% | 0 | 50 | 0% |
| 8.5 | 150 | 35 | 15 | 70% | 34 | 16 | 68% | 35 | 15 | 70% |
| 10.0 | 150 | 50 | 0 | 100% | 50 | 0 | 100% | 50 | 0 | 100% |
| 25.0 | 150 | 50 | 0 | 100% | 50 | 0 | 100% | 50 | 0 | 100% |
| 50.0 | 150 | 50 | 0 | 100% | 50 | 0 | 100% | 50 | 0 | 100% |
| 100.0 | 150 | 50 | 0 | 100% | 50 | 0 | 100% | 50 | 0 | 100% |
Inter-Lot Reproducibility of VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test Device (Dip Method):
| hCG Standards (mIU/mL) | Total # of Test | VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test Device (Dip Mode) | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Observed Results Lot 1 | | | Observed Results Lot 2 | | | Observed Results Lot 3 | | |
| | | P (+) | N (-) | % Positive | P (+) | N (-) | % Positive | P (+) | N (-) | % Positive |
| 0.0 | 150 | 0 | 50 | 0% | 0 | 50 | 0% | 0 | 50 | 0% |
| 3.0 | 150 | 0 | 50 | 0% | 0 | 50 | 0% | 0 | 50 | 0% |
| 5.0 | 150 | 0 | 50 | 0% | 0 | 50 | 0% | 0 | 50 | 0% |
| 8.5 | 150 | 34 | 16 | 68% | 35 | 15 | 70% | 34 | 16 | 68% |
| 10.0 | 150 | 50 | 0 | 100% | 15 | 0 | 100% | 50 | 0 | 100% |
| 25.0 | 150 | 50 | 0 | 100% | 15 | 0 | 100% | 50 | 0 | 100% |
| 50.0 | 150 | 50 | 0 | 100% | 15 | 0 | 100% | 50 | 0 | 100% |
| 100.0 | 150 | 50 | 0 | 100% | 15 | 0 | 100% | 50 | 0 | 100% |
2. Linearity:
Linearity is not applicable since this is a qualitative test.
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
Structurally non-related compounds
Negative urine samples and positive urine samples (containing 10 mIU/mL hCG) were spiked with potentially interfering exogenous and endogenous substances, and then
K182328 - Page 5 of 11
{5}
tested using 2 lots of the candidate device. No interference effect was observed at the concentrations tested, as reported in the below table.
| Substance | Concentration |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 20 mg/dL |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 20 mg/dL |
| Human serum Albumin | 2000 mg/dL |
| Hemoglobin | 20 mg/dL |
| Ampicillin | 20 mg/dL |
| Ascorbic acid | 20 mg/dL |
| Atropine | 20 mg/dL |
| Caffeine | 20 mg/dL |
| Cortisol | 200 ng/dL |
| EDTA | 80 mg/dL |
| Phenylpropanolamine | 20 mg/dL |
| Ephedrine | 20 mg/dL |
| Gentisic acid | 20 mg/dL |
| Glucose | 2000 mg/dL |
| Tetracycline | 20 mg/dL |
| Uric acid | 10 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin | 20 mg/dL |
| Ethanol | 0.1 % |
| Ethanol | 1 % |
| Salicylic Acid | 20 mg/dL |
Cross reactivity of structurally-related compounds:
Negative urine samples and positive (10 mIU/mL hCG) urine samples were spiked with hLH, hFSH, and hTSH, and tested using two lots of devices. No cross reactivity was observed at the concentrations tested, as reported in the below table.
| Substance | Concentration |
| --- | --- |
| hLH | 1000 mIU/mL |
| hFSH | 1000 mIU/mL |
| hTSH | 1000 μIU/mL |
K182328 - Page 6 of 11
{6}
Effect of urine pH and Specific Gravity:
Negative urine samples and positive (10 mIU/mL hCG) urine samples were adjusted to pH values of 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0 and 9.0 and then tested using the candidate device. The positive and negative hCG results were not affected by urine pH ranges between 4.0 and 9.0.
Negative urine samples and positive (10 mIU/mL hCG) urine samples were adjusted to Specific Gravity values of 1.003, 1.005, 1.010, 1.015, 1.020 and 1.030 and then tested using the candidate device. The positive and negative hCG results were not affected by urine Specific Gravity ranges between 1.003 and 1.030.
Effect of hCG β-core fragment:
Negative urine samples (0 and 5 mIU/mL hCG) and positive urine samples (10, 25 and 20,000 mIU/mL hCG) were spiked with hCG β-core fragment at concentrations of 51,000 pmol/L, 102,000 pmol/L, 204,000 pmol/L and 408,000 pmol/L and tested using 2 lots of the candidate device. All samples yielded correct results with hCG β-core fragment concentrations up to 408,000 pmol/L.
High dose hook effect study:
Negative urine samples were spiked with hCG at concentrations up to 450,000 mIU/mL, and tested in 2 replicates per lot using two lots of devices for each format. The results demonstrated that no hook effect was observed at hCG concentrations up to 450,000 mIU/mL.
4. Assay Reportable Range:
Not applicable.
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
The VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test is traceable to the World Health Organization 4th International Standard for hCG.
The stability testing protocol and acceptance criteria used to support the shelf life were reviewed and found to be acceptable. The sponsor claims a 24-month shelf life of the devices stored in the sealed foil pouches at 39-86 °F (4-30 °C).
6. Detection Limit:
See section IX.A.1.
7. Assay Cut-Off:
See section IX.A.1.
K182328 - Page 7 of 11
{7}
8. Accuracy (Instrument):
See section IX.B.1
9. Carry-Over:
Not applicable.
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
Urine samples were collected from 366 women for pregnancy testing. Of the 366 women, 215 were suspected to be pregnant. Patient samples were randomly collected at various time throughout the day. Ages of these women ranged from 19 to 41 years. All samples were masked and randomized prior to testing, and were tested by professionals using the candidate device (VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test; in simulated midstream mode and in dip mode) and the predicate (First Response Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test; in dip mode). The results are summarized in the table below.
| | Predicate Device | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Candidate Device (Simulated Midstream Mode) | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| | Positive | 215 | 0 | 215 |
| | Negative | 0 | 151 | 151 |
| | Total | 215 | 151 | 366 |
| | Predicate Device | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Candidate Device (Dip Mode) | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| | Positive | 215 | 0 | 215 |
| | Negative | 0 | 151 | 151 |
| | Total | 215 | 151 | 366 |
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not Applicable. The device is intended for urine samples only.
C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable.
K182328 - Page 8 of 11
{8}
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Not applicable.
## D Detection of hCG in Early Pregnancy Clinical Samples
A total of 616 urine samples were collected from 56 different women (25 - 43 years old) who planned to become pregnant. The women were followed throughout their conception cycles with urine collected from day -9 to day +1 of their expected period. The VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test device detected hCG in 69% of samples from five days before the expected menstrual period and 100% of samples from one day before the expected menstrual period. The early pregnancy detection results are summarized below:
| Day in cycle relative to EMP | hCG Positive Ratio (%) | | Overall Pregnancy Detection Rate (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Simulated Midstream Mode | Dip Mode | |
| -9 days | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| -8 days | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| -7 days | 12% | 12% | 12% |
| -6 days | 41% | 41% | 41% |
| -5 days | 69% | 69% | 69% |
| -4 days | 94% | 94% | 94% |
| -3 days | 98% | 98% | 98% |
| -2 days | 98% | 98% | 98% |
| -1 days | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 0 days | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| +1 days | 100% | 100% | 100% |
## E Lay User Study
A lay user study was performed at an intended use site with a total of 216 women with diverse educational and professional backgrounds, ages 18 years and older. 108 lay users tested the simulated midstream method and 108 lay users tested the dip method of the device. Lay users were only provided with the package insert prior to performing the study. Lay user results compared to professional user results are listed below.
| Pregnancy Result | Lay user vs. Professional user | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Simulated Midstream Mode | Dip Mode |
| Pregnant | 9/9 (100%) | 7/7 (100%) |
| Non-pregnant | 99/99 (100%) | 101/101 (100%) |
| Total | 108/108 (100%) | 108/108 (100%) |
K182328 - Page 9 of 11
{9}
Besides testing their own urine samples, lay users also tested 4 spiked urine samples around the cut-off level, at concentrations of 3.0, 7.0, 8.5 and 10 mIU/mL hCG. A total of 216 samples were tested by using the VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test at each hCG level. Among the 216 devices tested at each hCG level, 108 were tested via the simulated midstream mode, while the other 108 were tested via the dip mode. Lay user results compared to professional user results are listed below.
| hCG level mIU/mL | Lay user vs. Professional user | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Simulate Midstream Mode | | | Dip Mode | | |
| | Positive Results | | Percentage of Agreement | Positive Results | | Percentage of Agreement |
| | Lay user | Professional user | | Lay user | Professional user | |
| 3.0 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 7.5 | 52 | 52 | 100% | 56 | 56 | 100% |
| 8.5 | 77 | 77 | 100% | 73 | 73 | 100% |
| 10.0 | 108 | 108 | 100% | 108 | 108 | 100% |
All the lay users participated in the study were given a questionnaire to rate how well they understand the instruction in the package insert. A Flesch-Kincaid reading analysis was performed on the OTC package insert and the score demonstrated a reading Grade Level of 7.9. The result of the questionnaire reflected that the consumers found the test easy to use and that they did not have trouble understanding the labeling or interpreting results.
## F Specificity Study to Determine False-Positive Result Rate
A study was performed to determine the incidence of false positive test results from VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test among non-pregnant women in three age groups: 15–41 years of age (pre-menopausal), 42–55 years of age (peri-menopausal) and >55 year of age (post-menopausal). A total of 320 subjects provided urine samples including 100 from pre-menopausal patients, 111 from peri-menopausal patients, and 109 from post-menopausal patients. All 320 urine samples were tested with three lots of VeriClear Digital Early Result Pregnancy Test devices. No positive results were observed in any of the age groups.
## G Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
## H Expected Values/Reference Range:
Not applicable.
## I Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data:
Not applicable.
K182328 - Page 10 of 11
{10}
K182328 - Page 11 of 11
XI Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
XII Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.