The Blood Collection Accessory (BUCA) is a single use, sterile and non invasive device used for connecting to venous access device for the collection of blood specimens.
Device Story
BUCA is a single-use, sterile, non-invasive blood collection accessory. It consists of a polypropylene holder with a male luer feature, a stainless-steel needle, and a rubber sleeve. The device connects to venous access devices to facilitate blood specimen collection into evacuated tubes. The holder encases the needle to prevent needle-stick injuries and protects personnel from direct blood contact. The user inserts a sample collection tube into the holder; the needle pierces the tube stopper to allow blood flow. After collection, the tube is removed. The device is intended for clinical use by healthcare personnel. It provides a safe, standardized interface for blood transfer, reducing exposure risks and ensuring secure connection to venous access points.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Testing included biocompatibility (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, acute systemic toxicity, pyrogenicity, hemocompatibility) per ISO 10993-1 and performance testing (flow rate, leakage, insertion/evacuation force, holding strength of needle/sleeve, and deformation resistance).
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Polypropylene (holder), Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (adapter), stainless steel (needle), rubber (sleeve). Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide (EtO) per ISO 11135:2014 (SAL 10^-6). Connectivity: Mechanical luer connection. Standards: ISO 80369-7:2016, ISO 80369-20:2015, ISO 10993 series.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use as a single-use, sterile, non-invasive device for connecting to venous access devices to collect blood specimens.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A blood specimen collection device is a device intended for medical purposes to collect and to handle blood specimens and to separate serum from nonserum (cellular) components prior to further testing. This generic type device may include blood collection tubes, vials, systems, serum separators, blood collection trays, or vacuum sample tubes.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA text logo on the right. The FDA text logo is in blue and includes the letters "FDA" followed by the words "U.S. Food & Drug Administration".
July 30, 2019
NSP Tech Pte Ltd HC Tan 10 Admiralty Street, Northlink Building, #02-06 757695 Singapore
Re: K181754
Trade/Device Name: Blood Collection Accessory (BUCA) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1675 Regulation Name: Blood Specimen Collection Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JKA Dated: April 16, 2019 Received: June 28, 2019
Dear HC Tan:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmp/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for Alan Stevens Assistant Director DHT3C: Division of Drug Delivery and General Hospital Devices, and Human Factors OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn, General Hospital and Urology Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K181754
Device Name Blood Collection Accessory (BUCA)
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Blood Collection Accessory (BUCA) is a single use, sterile and non invasive device used for connecting to venous access device for the collection of blood specimens.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 1. SUBMITTER:
### Applicant Name:
NSP Tech Pte Ltd 10 Admiralty Street, Northlink Building, #02-06 Singapore 757695
### Contact Person:
Name: HC Tan Phone: (65)98180450 Fax: (65)67476533 Email: hockchoon.tan@nsptech.com.sg
| Establishment registration number | : 3008337059 |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------|
| Date prepared | : July 29, 2019 |
#### DEVICE 2.
| Trade Name : | Blood Collection Accessory (BUCA) |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Common Name : | Blood Specimen Collection Device |
| Regulatory Class : | Class II |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 862.1675 |
| Regulation Name: | Blood Specimen Collection Device |
| Product Code : | JKA |
| Panel : | Clinical Chemistry |
#### PREDICATE DEVICE 3.
Vacutainer® Brand Multiple Sample Luer Adapter
| 510(k) Number: | K991088 |
|--------------------|----------------|
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CR 862.1675 |
| Product Code: | JKA |
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION: 4.
The Blood Collection Accessory (BUCA) is a single use device comprising of a holder made from polypropylene plastic with a male luer feature. A stainless-steel needle covered with a rubber sleeve is attached to the inside of the holder.
The Blood Collection Accessory (BUCA) has a Holder that encases the Needle preventing any needle stick issue with user. The Holder of the Blood Collection Accessory (BUCA) also house the sample collection tube and protects the user or healthcare personnel from direct
{4}------------------------------------------------
contact with blood specimen. The Adapter connected to the blood collection device for the blood transfer. The sample collection tube is inserted from the far end of the holder where the opening is located. This transfer is conducted until the required amount of blood is completed. The sample collection tube is then evacuated from the Blood Collection Accessory (BUCA) by pulling it away from the latter.
#### INDICATION FOR USE STATEMENT 5.
The Blood Collection Accessory (BUCA) is a single use, sterile and non invasive device used for connecting to venous access device for the collection of blood specimens.
#### SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE COMPARISON 6.
### TABLE OF COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH PREDICATE DEVICE
| | NSP Tech Pte Ltd<br>Blood Collection<br>Accessory (BUCA) | Vacutainer® Brand<br>Multiple Sample Luer<br>Adapter | Discussion/Comment |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510 (k) Number | K181754 | K991088 | |
| Classification | Class II | Class II | same |
| Product Code | JKA | JKA | same |
| Indication For Use | The Blood Collection<br>Accessory (BUCA) is<br>a single use, sterile<br>and non invasive<br>device used for<br>connecting to<br>venous access device<br>for the collection of<br>blood specimens. | The Vacutainer Brand<br>Luer Adapter is a sterile,<br>non-invasive device used<br>to connect venous<br>access devices such as<br>needles, blood collection<br>sets, and infusion sets to<br>blood collection tubes.<br>They are also used in<br>connection with non-<br>needle devices for<br>collection of blood from<br>catheters. The<br>Vacutainer Brand Luer<br>Adapter is sold by itself<br>and as a component of<br>other Vacutainer Brand<br>devices. | Similar- The difference is<br>in the name of the<br>device, this does not<br>raise any questions of<br>safety or effectiveness.<br>The predicate specifies<br>the devices that it<br>connects with and the<br>subject device does not. |
| Manufacturer | NSP Tech Pte Ltd | Becton Dickinson | |
| Product<br>Configuration | Holder –<br>Polypropylene<br>Adapter - Acrylonitrile<br>butadiene<br>styrene<br>Sleeve – Not made<br>with natural<br>rubber latex<br>Needle - Stainless<br>Steel | Holder – Polypropylene<br>Adapter - Polycarbonate<br>Sleeve - Not made<br>with natural<br>rubber latex<br>Needle - Stainless Steel | The only major<br>difference between the<br>subject device and the<br>predicate device is in the<br>material used for the<br>part, Adapter. The<br>subject device, Blood<br>Collection Accessory<br>(BUCA) uses the<br>polymer, Acrylonitrile<br>butadiene styrene (ABS)<br>for the Adapter part<br>while the predicate<br>device uses<br>Polycarbonate (PC)<br>polymer.<br>Biocompatibility Testing<br>and Performance<br>Testing was conducted<br>to demonstrate SE. |
| Sterilization | Ethylene Oxide (EtO)<br>Gas sterilization | Ethylene Oxide (EtO) Gas<br>sterilization same | |
| Sterility | Meet the Sterility<br>Assurance Level of 10-<br>6 as per the<br>requirement of ISO<br>11135:2014 | Not known | Non-Clinical Performance<br>Testing was conducted to<br>demonstrate SE. |
| Packaging | Sealed Blister<br>Packaging | Sealed Blister Packaging | Non-Clinical<br>Performance Testing<br>was conducted to<br>demonstrate SE. |
| Use | Single-Use only | Single-Use only | same |
| Bio compatibility | ISO 10993 series | ISO 10993 series | same |
| Shelf Life | 1 year | 3 years | Non-Clinical Performance<br>Testing was conducted to<br>demonstrate SE. |
{5}------------------------------------------------
# 7. TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS COMPARISON
The Blood Collection Accessory (BUCA) device has similarities with the predicate device in areas such as Intended Use Product Configuration, and performance.. The only difference between the subject device and the predicate device is in the use of material for the part, Adapter. The Blood Collection Accessory (BUCA) uses the polymer material, Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) while the Page 3 of 5
{6}------------------------------------------------
predicate device uses the polymer material, Polycarbonate (PC). Biocompatibility tests and performance tests based on international standards demonstrated the device performs as intended. The indications for use of the predicate device specifies the blood collection devices it connects to. The Subject device does not specify the blood collection devices, this does not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness.
#### 8. Performance Data/Non-Clinical Testing:
The Blood Collection Accessory (BUCA) was tested for validation and verification of functions based on risk analysis and the results passed predetermined acceptance criteria.
## Biocompatibility
Biocompatibility was evaluated per the FDA Guidance titled Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" - Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff issued in June 2016 with the following endpoints:
Cytotoxicity
Sensitization
Irritation
Acute Systemic Toxicity
Pyrogenicity
Hemocompatibility (Coagulation, Platelets and Hemolysis)
### PerformanceData
Performance testing was carried out on the Blood Collection Accessory (BUCA) using applicable international standards as reference and predicate device as benchmark for comparison.
- . Luer Lok Adapter
For international standard related test, the Luer Lok adapter is tested with reference to the ISO 80369-7:2016 and ISO 80369-20:2015.
- Performance Testing
As for the benchmarking tests related to the predicate device, blood collection performances such as the flow rate and quality of holding strength of sleeve to adapter and needle to adapter are assessed and compared against that of the predicate device.. The test methods employed are as summarized below:
- o Flow Rate The time taken to fill up a 3.0 ml blood collection Test tube with liquid of viscosity similar to blood is recorded.
{7}------------------------------------------------
- o Leakage With the device held in place by a fixture, the maximum numbers of round of insertion and Testevacuation of blood collection tube the device can withstand before leakage start occurring at the device is recorded.
- The device is held in place by a fixture and a force Evacuation o Force Test taken to insert or evacuate a blood collection tube into the holder of the device is recorded.
- Using fixture to hold the adapter in place, the o Holding Strength of needle is pull in a direction away from the adapter. The force taken to dislodge the needle Needle to Adapter Test from the adapter is recorded.
- With the adapter held in place by a fixture, the Holding o sleeve is pull in a direction away from the adapter Strength of and the force taken to dislodge the sleeve from the Sleeve to adapter is recorded. Adapter Test -
- Deformation The device is held in place by a fixture and a 5 kg o Test force is applied on the device for a period of 5 minutes. The permanent change in outer diameter of the holder of the device before and after compression by the applied force is measured and recorded. This test assesses the quality of the holder.
### Sterilization
Sterilization is done in accordance to ISO 11135-1:2014.
The Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) is 10-6.
#### SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE CONCLUSION 9.
The result of non-clinical testing demonstrates that the Blood Collection Accessory (BUCA) is substantially to the predicate device, Vacutainer® Brand Multiple Sample Luer Adapter and has been demonstrated to meet its predetermined specifications.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.