HardyDisk AST Disks are used for semi-quantitative in vitro susceptibility testing by the agar diffusion test procedure (Kirby-Bauer) of rapidly growing and certain fastidious bacterial pathogens. Standardized methods for agar diffusion testing have been described for Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Enterococcus spp., and by modified procedures, Haemophilus spp., Neisseria gonorrhoeae, N. meningitidis and Streptococcus spp., including Streptococcus pneumoniae. Use of HardyDisk AST Plazomicin 30μg (PLZ30) for in vitro agar diffusion susceptibility testing is indicated when there is need to determine the susceptibility of bacteria to Plazomicin. Plazomicin has been shown to be active against susceptible isolates of the following bacteria both in vitro and in clinical infections: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter cloacae. Plazomicin has been shown to be active in vitro against susceptible isolates of the following bacteria: Citrobacter freundii, Citrobacter koseri, Enterobacter aerogenes, Klebsiella oxytoca, Morganella morganii, Proteus vulgaris, Providencia stuartii, Serratia marcenscens. HardyDisk AST Disks are used for semi-quantitative in vitro susceptibility testing by the agar diffusion test procedure (Kirby-Bauer) of rapidly growing and certain fastidious bacterial pathogens. Standardized methods for agar diffusion testing have been described for Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Enterococcus spp., and by modified procedures, Haemophilus spp., Neisseria gonorrhoeae, N. meningitidis and Streptococcus spp., including Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Device Story
HardyDisk AST Plazomicin 30μg (PLZ30) consists of 6-mm filter paper disks impregnated with 30μg of the antimicrobial agent Plazomicin. Used in clinical microbiology laboratories for Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility testing. Procedure involves inoculating agar plates with bacterial isolates, placing disks on the surface, and incubating for 16-18 hours. Healthcare providers measure the resulting zone of inhibition diameter and compare it against established interpretive criteria (R/I/S) to determine bacterial susceptibility. This information assists clinicians in selecting appropriate antibiotic therapy for patients with bacterial infections.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical trials were performed for this device. Substantial equivalence is supported by bench testing, including reproducibility, quality control, and disk-to-MIC correlation studies conducted in accordance with CDER guidance for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Interpretive criteria and QC ranges were established based on data evaluated by CDER and are consistent with CLSI M100 standards.
Technological Characteristics
Antimicrobial susceptibility test disc; 30ug Plazomicin concentration; paper disc format; Class II device (21 CFR 866.1620); Product Code JTN.
Indications for Use
Indicated for in vitro agar diffusion susceptibility testing of bacteria to Plazomicin. Applicable to Enterobacteriaceae, including E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis, E. cloacae, C. freundii, C. koseri, E. aerogenes, K. oxytoca, M. morganii, P. vulgaris, P. stuartii, and S. marcenscens. For prescription use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An antimicrobial susceptibility test disc is a device that consists of antimicrobic-impregnated paper discs used to measure by a disc-agar diffusion technique or a disc-broth elution technique the in vitro susceptibility of most clinically important bacterial pathogens to antimicrobial agents. In the disc-agar diffusion technique, bacterial susceptibility is ascertained by directly measuring the magnitude of a zone of bacterial inhibition around the disc on an agar surface. The disc-broth elution technique is associated with an automated rapid susceptibility test system and employs a fluid medium in which susceptibility is ascertained by photometrically measuring changes in bacterial growth resulting when antimicrobial material is eluted from the disc into the fluid medium. Test results are used to determine the antimicrobial agent of choice in the treatment of bacterial diseases.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K181700
B. Purpose for Submission:
Addition of Plazomicin Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Disk
C. Measurand:
Plazomicin 30μg
D. Type of Test:
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Disks
E. Applicant:
Hardy Diagnostics
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
HardyDisk AST Plazomicin 30μg (PLZ30)
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 866.1620 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Disc
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
JTN
4. Panel:
83, Microbiology
1
{1}
# H. Intended Use:
# 1. Intended use(s):
HardyDisk AST Disks are used for semi-quantitative in vitro susceptibility testing by the agar diffusion test procedure (Kirby-Bauer) of rapidly growing and certain fastidious bacterial pathogens. Standardized methods for agar diffusion testing have been described for Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Enterococcus spp., and by modified procedures, Haemophilus spp., Neisseria gonorrhoeae, N. meningitidis and Streptococcus spp., including Streptococcus pneumoniae.
# 2. Indication(s) for use:
Use of HardyDisk AST Plazomicin 30μg (PLZ30) for in vitro agar diffusion susceptibility testing is indicated when there is need to determine the susceptibility of bacteria to Plazomicin.
Plazomicin has been shown to be active against susceptible isolates of the following bacteria both in vitro and in clinical infections:
Escherichia coli
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Proteus mirabilis
Enterobacter cloacae
Plazomicin has been shown to be active in vitro against susceptible isolates of the following bacteria:
Citrobacter freundii
Citrobacter koseri
Enterobacter aerogenes
Klebsiella oxytoca
Morganella morganii
Proteus vulgaris
Providencia stuartii
Serratia marcenscens
HardyDisk AST Disks are used for semi-quantitative in vitro susceptibility testing by the agar diffusion test procedure (Kirby-Bauer) of rapidly growing and certain fastidious bacterial pathogens. Standardized methods for agar diffusion testing have been described for Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Enterococcus spp., and by modified procedures, Haemophilus spp., Neisseria gonorrhoeae, N. meningitidis and Streptococcus spp., including Streptococcus pneumoniae.
2
{2}
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
N/A
# I. Device Description:
HardyDisk AST Disks utilize 6-mm diameter white filter paper disks. The disks are prepared by impregnating absorbent paper with a known concentration of 30μg Plazomicin. The disks are marked with the code PLZ30 on both sides.
HardyDisk AST Disks are supplied in plastic cartridges containing 50 disks each. They are also packaged as one cartridge per vial with desiccant or five cartridges per vial with desiccant.
# J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
HardyDisk Tigecycline 15μg
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K062245
3. Comparison with predicate:
3
{3}
Table 1: Comparison with the Predicate
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | DeviceK181700HardyDiskPlazomicin 30μg | PredicateK062245HardyDiskTigecycline 15μg |
| Test Method | Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing using paper disks impregnated with an antimicrobial agent | Same |
| Methodology | Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Test Protocol requires the user to determine categorical interpretations (S/I/R) using the measured zone diameters. | Same |
| Inoculum | Prepared from pure isolated colonies to match the turbidity equivalent of a 0.5 McFarland in Tryptic Soy Broth. | Same |
| Inoculation Method | Dip a sterile swab into the prepared inoculum and streak an appropriate agar plate's surface three times. Add the disks impregnated with the antimicrobial agent to the surface of the plate. Incubate the agar plate agar side up in a \( 35 \pm 2^{\circ}C \) incubator for 16-18 hours. | Same |
| Reading Method | The user will interpret the zone diameters according established interpretive criteria for the drug. | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Product Name | HardyDisk Plazomicin 30μg (PLZ30) | HardyDisk Tigecycline |
| Antimicrobial Agent | Plazomicin | Tigecycline |
| Concentration | 30μg | 15μg |
### K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI M100 28 \( ^{th} \) Edition, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
### L. Test Principle:
The HardyDisk AST Disk is based on the agar diffusion (Kirby-Bauer) methodology. It utilizes dried filter paper disks impregnated with a known concentration of an antimicrobial agent that are placed onto the test medium surface. Mueller Hinton agar is recommended for agar diffusion testing of non-fastidious organisms and Mueller Hinton with 5% Sheep Blood
4
{4}
is recommended for Streptococcus spp. Three to five similar colonies are transferred to 4-5 mL of a suitable broth medium. The broth is incubated at 35°C for 2-6 hours to develop a turbidity that exceeds or is equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard. Alternatively, a direct broth or saline suspension of colonies may be prepared from an overnight culture. The final inoculum density should be equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard. The inoculum density may also be standardized photometrically.
Within 15 minutes of inoculum preparation, the Mueller Hinton agar plate is streaked with an inoculated swab to obtain an even inoculation of organism. Disks are aseptically placed onto the agar surface with a disk dispenser and the disks are pressed down with a sterile needle or forceps to make contact with the agar surface. Agar plates are incubated in an ambient air incubator at 35±2°C for 16 - 18 hours. Fastidious organisms are tested using appropriate media incubated in an atmosphere enriched with 5% CO₂, as recommended in the CLSI M02 approved standard document.
After incubation the agar medium is examined for a zone of inhibition around the disks. The zones of inhibition are measured to the nearest millimeter and compared to recognized zone size ranges for the antimicrobial agent being tested.
### M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
Descriptive characteristics were sufficient for the HardyDisk Plazomicin 30μg (PLZ30) disk based on extensive data from several microbiology disk studies evaluated by CDER which were used to generate the breakpoints and quality control (QC) expected ranges used for this subject device. The disk data used to support this submission included data from testing organisms within the spectrum of activity of plazomicin. Data was obtained from reproducibility, quality control and disk to MIC correlation studies and was generated in accordance with the CDER Clinical/Antimicrobial guidance, Microbiology Data for Systemic Antibacterial Drugs- Development, Analysis, and Presentation to ensure precise, accurate, and reproducible results.
For this review, the interpretative criteria are applied broadly to include the Enterobacteriaceae family. The list of bacterial species has been expanded and is not limited only to the indicated species.
The following statements are added as footnotes to the plazomicin interpretative criteria table for Enterobacteriaceae in the HardyDisk AST package insert:
The statement below is added to the package insert and is consistent with the FDA STIC website:
- The safety and efficacy of plazomicin in treating clinical infections due to organisms other than Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, and Enterobacter cloacae may not have been established in adequate and well-controlled clinical trials. The clinical significance of susceptibility information in such instances is unknown.
5
{5}
Regarding resistance marker/enzyme characterization, Enterobacteriaceae isolates harboring extended spectrum βeta-Lactamases (ESBL) including CTX-M, SHV, TEM; AmpC; carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, OXA, VIM); aminoglycoside modifying enzymes (AMEs) including AAC, AAD, ANT, APH; 16S rRNA methyltransferases (plazomicin resistant RMTB and armA) were tested with the HardyDisk Plazomicin. Information regarding the performance of Plazomicin with isolates that exhibit overexpression of efflux pumps or lower expression of porins is provided in the following footnote:
o The performance of HardyDisk AST Plazomicin 30μg (PLZ30) is unknown for Enterobacteriaceae with the following resistance mechanisms: overexpression of efflux pumps (e.g., acrAB-tolC) or lower expression of porins (e.g., ompF or ompK36).
# 1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Not applicable
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Not applicable
d. Detection limit:
Not applicable
e. Analytical specificity:
Not applicable
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
# 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Not applicable
b. Matrix comparison:
6
{6}
Not applicable
### 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
### 4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
### 5. Expected values/Reference range:
The plazomicin interpretative criteria for disk diffusion in the approved pharmaceutical drug package insert is located at the FDA STIC website and shown in Table 2 below.
Table 2: Interpretative Criteria for Plazomicin Disk
| Indications For Use Organism(s) | Interpretative Criteria | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Zone Diameter (mm) | | |
| | R | I | S |
| Enterobacteriaceae | ≤13 | 14-15 | ≥16 |
The QC isolates and expected ranges are the same as recommended by the current (28 \( ^{th} \) ) edition of CLSI M100.
## N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
## O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
7
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.