K181644 · Eit Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · MAX · Oct 12, 2018 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K181644
Device Name
EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF
Applicant
Eit Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH
Product Code
MAX · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Oct 12, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3080
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). These spinal implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and/or allogeneic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft. EIT Spine LLIF is to be used with supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of non- operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.
Device Story
Intervertebral body fusion device; used in Lateral Lumbar Intervertebral Fusion (LLIF) procedures; restores intervertebral height; facilitates fusion. Device features hollow geometry for packing with autogenous or allogeneic bone graft. Used in L2-S1 spinal levels; requires supplemental fixation (e.g., posterior pedicle screws). Implanted by surgeons in clinical settings. Benefits patients by stabilizing spinal segments and promoting fusion in degenerative disc disease cases.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical trials performed. Evidence consists of bench testing (mechanical testing per ASTM F2077 and ASTM F2267; MRI safety per ASTM F2052-15, F2213-06, F2182-11a), biocompatibility assessment per ISO 10993, and a clinical literature review supporting the use of allogeneic bone graft materials.
Technological Characteristics
Material: Ti-6Al-4V ELI (ASTM F3001). Manufacturing: Additive manufacturing. Design: Solid and porous structures; hollow geometry for bone graft packing. Connectivity: None. Sterilization: Not specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1, including those with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis. Requires at least 6 months of non-operative treatment.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
*Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required.* Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains two logos. On the left is the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services, which features a stylized human figure. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
October 12, 2018
EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH % Justin Eggleton Director, Spine Regulatory Affairs Musculoskeletal Clinical Regulatory Advisers, LLC 1050 K Street NW. Suite 1000 Washington, District of Columbia 20005
Re: K181644
Trade/Device Name: EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MAX Dated: October 4, 2018 Received: October 5, 2018
### Dear Justin Eggleton:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.htm); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Brent Showalter -S
for Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K181644
#### Device Name
EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). These spinal implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and/or allogeneic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft. EIT Spine LLIF is to be used with supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of non- operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| Permitted Use (Part 21 CFR 201 Subpart D) | <div style="display:inline-block; width:20px; height:20px; border:1px solid black;">☑</div> |
|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 201 Subpart C) | <div style="display:inline-block; width:20px; height:20px; border:1px solid black;">☐</div> |
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
| Device Trade Name: | EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF | | | | | |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
| Manufacturer: | EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH<br>Eisenbahnstrasse 84<br>78573 Wurmlingen, Germany<br>Phone: +49 7461 1716900 | | | | | |
| Contact: | Mrs. Barbara Wirth<br>EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH<br>Eisenbahnstrasse 84<br>78573 Wurmlingen, Germany | | | | | |
| Prepared by: | Mr. Justin Eggleton<br>Senior Director, Spine Regulatory Affairs<br>Musculoskeletal Clinical Regulatory Advisers, LLC<br>1050 K Street NW, Suite 1000<br>Washington, DC 20001<br>jeggleton@mcra.com | | | | | |
| Date Prepared: | October 12, 2018 | | | | | |
| Classifications: | 21 CFR §888.3080, Intervertebral body fusion device | | | | | |
| Class: | II | | | | | |
| Product Codes: | MAX | | | | | |
#### Indications for Use:
EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These spinal implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and/or allogeneic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft. EIT Spine LLIF is to be used with supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of nonoperative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.
### Device Description:
The purpose of this Traditional 510(k) is to seek marketing clearance for the EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF to be added to the EIT Spine line of lumbar interbody cages. The EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF is used to restore intervertebral height
{4}------------------------------------------------
and to facilitate intervertebral body fusion in the spine using an LLIF (Lateral Lumbar Intervertebral Fusion) approach with autogenous bone graft and/or allogenic bone graft materials. The EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF is intended to be used from L2-S1 in patients with DDD and up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at one or two contiguous levels. The device is intended to be used alongside supplemental spinal fixation. either applied anteriorly or posteriorly (e.g., using posterior pedicle screws).
The EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF is made from Ti-6AI-4V ELI (ASTM F3001) by an additive manufacturing process. The design contains solid structures and porous structures. The hollow geometry of the implants allows the cage to be packed with autogenous bone graft.
### Primary Predicate Device:
The EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF is substantially equivalent to the SPINEART JULIET® LL Lateral Lumbar Cage in device indications, surgical approach, design, and performance.
| Table 1: Primary Predicate Devices | | |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------|----------|
| Manufacturer | Device Name | K-Number |
| SPINEART | JULIET® LL Lateral Lumbar Cage | K161888 |
#### Additional Predicate Devices:
The EIT Cellular Titanium® PLIF Cages, EIT Cellular Titanium® TLIF Cages, and EIT Cellular Titanium® ALIF Cages (EIT Emerging Implant Technologies, GmbH) (K172888) are substantially equivalent to the subject device with respect to indications, design, additive manufacturing process, and performance.
### Performance Testing Summary:
The testing of the EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF and cage-dedicated instruments includes:
- Mechanical testing per ASTM F2077 and ASTM F2267: Static compression, static ● compression-shear, dynamic compression, dynamic compression-shear, expulsion, and subsidence
- Biocompatibility rationale comparing the materials used to manufacture the device ● and instruments with confirmed biocompatibility profiles per ISO 10993.
- MRI Safety Testing per ASTM F2052-15, ASTM F2213-06, and ASTM F2182-● 11a
The subject device, the EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF, can be used with autogenous bone graft and/or allogenic bone graft materials to facilitate fusion. Both the primary and secondary predicate devices are indicated for use only with autogenous bone graft. As a result of the inclusion of allogenic bone graft materials in this submission, a comprehensive clinical literature review was performed to show the clinical performance of allograft bone materials for lumbar interbody fusion.
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### Substantial Equivalence:
The subject devices were demonstrated to be substantially equivalent to predicates cited in the table above with respect to indications, design, materials, function, manufacturing, and performance. Pyrogenicity testing has been completed on the "worst case" EIT lumbar cages. Equivalence has been established to these EIT lumbar cages and the EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF subject device cages do not introduce a new "worst case" cage. As a result, the pyrogenicity testing completed for the EIT lumbar cage family is applicable to the EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF devices.
### Conclusion:
The EIT Cellular Titanium® Lumbar Cage LLIF is substantially equivalent to the cited predicate devices with respect to its indications for use, design, function, materials, and performance.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.