K181518 · Sebacia, Inc. · QCY · Sep 6, 2018 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K181518
Device Name
Sebacia Microparticles
Applicant
Sebacia, Inc.
Product Code
QCY · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Sep 6, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4810
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Sebacia Microparticles are indicated for use as an accessory to 1064 nm lasers to facilitate photothermal heating of sebaceous glands for the treatment of mild to moderate inflammatory acne vulgaris.
Device Story
Sebacia Microparticles are a non-sterile, single-use topical suspension containing silica-core, gold-shell, polyethylene glycol-coated microparticles. Applied to the face and massaged into the skin, the particles act as an accessory to commercially available 1064 nm Nd:YAG lasers. The laser energy is absorbed by the microparticles, inducing localized selective photothermolysis of sebaceous glands. Used in a clinical setting by a healthcare provider, the device allows for effective acne treatment using lower laser fluences and fewer treatment sessions compared to laser-only therapy. The procedure aims to reduce inflammatory lesion counts, providing a therapeutic benefit for patients with acne vulgaris.
Clinical Evidence
Randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical study (n=168) comparing Sebacia Microparticles + 1064 nm laser vs. laser alone. Primary endpoint: % reduction in inflammatory lesion count (ILC) at Week 12. Results: SM + Laser (mean 40.17%, median 53.33%) vs. Laser Alone (mean 41.89%, median 45.45%). Secondary endpoints (e.g., IGA clear/almost clear) were supportive. SM + Laser group required fewer treatment sessions (median 3.0 vs 6.0) and lower mean fluence (29.44 J/cm² vs 48.93 J/cm²). Safety profile was positive with no severe or serious treatment-related adverse events.
Technological Characteristics
Microparticles consist of a silica core, gold shell, and polyethylene glycol coating. Designed for use with 1064 nm Nd:YAG lasers meeting specific parameters: fluence 20-35 J/cm², 30 ms pulse duration, and 5-15 mm spot size. Biocompatibility tested per ISO 10993-1. Non-sterile, single-use topical suspension. Shelf-life: 2 years.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with mild to moderate inflammatory acne vulgaris.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
(1) A carbon dioxide laser for use in general surgery and in dermatology is a laser device intended to cut, destroy, or remove tissue by light energy emitted by carbon dioxide.(2) An argon laser for use in dermatology is a laser device intended to destroy or coagulate tissue by light energy emitted by argon.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Sebacia, Inc. % John Smith, Partner Hogan Lovells US LLP 555 13th Street. NW Washington, District of Columbia 20004
# Re: K181518
Trade/Device Name: Sebacia Microparticles Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4810 Regulation Name: Laser Surgical Instrument for use in General and Plastic Surgery and in Dermatology Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OCY Dated: June 8, 2018 Received: June 8, 2018
# Dear John Smith:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.htm); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Neil R Ogden -S 2018.09.06 23:23:49 -04'00'
For Binita S. Ashar, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.S. Director Division of Surgical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 06/30/2020 See PRA Statement below
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name
Sebacia Microparticles
Indications for Use (Describe)
Sebacia Microparticles are indicated for use as an accessory to 1064 nm lasers to facilitate photothermal heating of sebaceous glands for the treatment of mild to moderate inflammatory acne vulgaris.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 C.F.R. § 801 Subpart D)
□ Over-The-Counter Use (21 C.F.R. § 801 Subpart C)
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number.
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) SUMMARY
### SEBACIA, INC.
#### SEBACIA MICROPARTICLES
#### Submitter
Sebacia, Inc. 2905 Premiere Parkway Suite 150 Duluth, GA 30097
Contact: Todd J. Meyer COO & General Counsel Phone: 678-417-7626 Email: tmeyer@tif.net
Date Prepared: June 7. 2018
#### Device Information
| Device Name: | Sebacia Microparticles |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Powered Laser Surgical Instrument |
| Classification Name: | Laser surgical instrument for use in general and plastic surgery and in Dermatology |
| Classification Panel: | General & Plastic Surgery |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | QCY |
| Regulation: | 21 C.F.R. § 878.4810 |
#### Predicate Devices
Sebacia Microparticles are an accessory to legally marketed 1064 nm medical lasers intended for dermatologic use, and specifically for the treatment of mild to moderate inflammatory acne vulgaris, such as the 1064 nm Nd:YAG Cutera CoolGlide Aesthetic Lasers (K153671).
The predicate device is the 1064 nm Nd:YAG Cutera CoolGlide Aesthetic Lasers (K153671). This device is one example of a legally marketed device meeting the specifications for use with the Sebacia Microparticles.
#### Device Description
Sebacia Microparticles are a non-sterile, single-use product that is topically applied to the face for the purpose of supporting and supplementing the performance of legally marketed 1064 nm medical lasers for dermatologic use. The liquid suspension contains microparticles comprised of a silica core wrapped in a gold shell and coated with polyethylene glycol. The Sebacia Microparticles are topically applied to the face followed by gentle agitation of the skin surface using a mechanical massager and irradiated with a commercially available 1064 nm laser that heats the microparticles resulting in localized selective photothermolysis. The legally marketed 1064 nm medical laser used with the Sebacia Microparticles must meet the following specifications:
{4}------------------------------------------------
- o Fluence ranging from 20 J/cm2 to 35 J/cm²
- o Pulse duration of 30 ms
- At least 5-15mm spot size
# Intended Use / Indications for Use
Sebacia Microparticles are indicated for use as an accessory to 1064 nm lasers to facilitate photothermal heating of sebaceous glands for the treatment of mild to moderate inflammatory acne vulgaris.
## Performance Data
# Nonclinical Testing
Sebacia Microparticles were tested ex vivo for photothermal heating ability, biocompatibility (in accordance with ISO 10993-1) and shelf life. All results met predetermined performance criteria. The established shelf-life for the product is two (2) years based on real-time stability testing data. Three animal studies in a porcine model were performed to evaluate formulation and laser parameters, as well as safety, prior to the commencement of clinical testing. The results of animal testing demonstrate that Sebacia Microparticles meet prospective product requirements for functionality and safety.
### Clinical Studies
A randomized, controlled, parallel group, clinical study with blinded assessment was conducted in the U.S. to evaluate the Sebacia Microparticles when used with a 1064 nm Nd:Yag laser in facial mild to moderate inflammatory acne vulgaris. A total of 168 subjects received treatment, with approximately half of the subjects receiving the Sebacia Microparticles with laser ("SM + Laser") treatment and the other half receiving Laser Alone. Results are summarized in the table below:
| | SM + Laser<br>(n = 86) | Laser Alone<br>(n = 82) |
|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------|
| PRIMARY ENDPOINT | | |
| % reduction in ILC (Baseline to Week 12); mean | 40.17 | 41.89 |
| % reduction in ILC (Baseline to Week 12); median | 53.33 | 45.45 |
| SECONDARY ENDPOINTS | | |
| % with ≥ 40% ILC reduction at Week 12 | 64.4 | 56.5 |
| % with IGA clear/almost clear at Week 12 | 30.1 | 31.9 |
| absolute reduction in ILC (Baseline to Wk 12); mean | 8.4 | 8.5 |
| absolute reduction in ILC (Baseline to Wk 12); median | 11.0 | 9.0 |
| TREATMENT PARAMETERS | | |
| laser fluence (J/cm²); mean | 29.44 | 48.93 |
| laser fluence (J/cm²); median | 30.00 | 49.79 |
| number of treatment sessions (All Patients); mean | 2.9 | 5.3 |
| number of treatment sessions (All Patients); median | 3.0 | 6.0 |
| number of treatment sessions (Completers); mean | 3.0 | 5.8 |
| number of treatment sessions (Completers); median | 3.0 | 6.0 |
# EFFECTIVENESS AND TREATMENT PARAMETER RESULTS
ILC = inflammatory lesion count
Percentage reduction in inflammatory lesion count from Baseline to Week 12 was assessed, revealing similar acne treatment effects for each group. Analyses of the secondary endpoints were supportive of the primary effectiveness analyses with results indicative of similar acne treatment effects for
{5}------------------------------------------------
SM + Laser when compared to Laser Alone. Summary results for subject satisfaction revealed that more subjects reported "Complete Improvement" or "Marked Improvement" in the SM + Laser treatment group than in the Laser Alone group. Analyses of overall mean fluence and the number of treatment sessions clearly demonstrated that use of fewer treatments and lower laser fluences in the SM + Laser Group resulted in equivalent reduction in mild to moderate inflammatory acne lesions when compared to the reduction in the Laser Alone Group.
Treatment with the Sebacia Microparticles also demonstrated a positive safety profile. The most frequent adverse events reported in both treatment groups were primarily general illnesses and complaints that were unrelated to study treatment. Furthermore, over 90% of the AEs reported in each treatment group were unrelated to study treatment. All reported AES, regardless of study treatment were of mild to moderate intensity. There were no severe AEs nor were there any serious and/or unanticipated adverse events related to study treatment.
# Conclusions
Sebacia Microparticles are indicated for use as an accessory to 1064 nm lasers to facilitate photothermal heating of sebaceous glands for the treatment of mild to moderate inflammatory acne vulgaris. In sum, the non-clinical and clinical data support the substantial equivalence of the Sebacia Microparticles to the predicate device for the proposed indications.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.