The Apex Femoral Nailing system is intended for temporary fixation of the fractures of the femur. The Apex nail is indicated for used in adult patients for treatment of: - Open and closed fractures, including simple, severely comminuted, spiral, large oblique, and segmental fractures; - Fractures involving osteopenic or osteoporotic bone; - Fractures with bone loss; - Pseudoarthosis, nonunion, and malunion; - Correction osteotomy; - Pathologic fractures and prophylactic nailing of impending pathologic fractures; - Periprosthetic fractures; - Closed supracondylar fractures (retrograde only) and: - Intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures (antegrade only)
Device Story
Apex Femoral Nailing System is an intramedullary fixation device for femoral fractures. System comprises femoral nail, bone screws, bolts, and endcaps. Surgeon implants nail into femoral canal and interlocks proximally and distally using screws/bolts via surgical instrumentation kit. Proximal nail stem insert maintains torsional stability during dynamization. Device provides temporary mechanical stabilization of bone fragments to facilitate healing. Used in clinical/surgical settings by orthopedic surgeons. Benefits include restoration of structural integrity for various fracture types, including pathologic and osteoporotic bone.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Testing conducted in accordance with ASTM F1264-16 (intramedullary fixation devices) and ASTM F543-07 (metallic bone screws). Includes full construct testing and bacterial endotoxin testing. All acceptance criteria were met.
Technological Characteristics
Constructed from Titanium 6AL4VELi. Intramedullary fixation rod design with proximal/distal locking options. Includes femoral nail, bone screws, bolts, and endcaps. Tested per ASTM F1264-16 and ASTM F543-07. Sterile.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adult patients requiring temporary fixation of femoral fractures, including open/closed, comminuted, spiral, oblique, segmental, osteopenic/osteoporotic, pathologic, periprosthetic, supracondylar (retrograde), intertrochanteric/subtrochanteric (antegrade), and fractures with bone loss, nonunion, or malunion.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intramedullary fixation rod is a device intended to be implanted that consists of a rod made of alloys such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum and stainless steel. It is inserted into the medullary (bone marrow) canal of long bones for the fixation of fractures.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logos of the Department of Health & Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo includes the text "U.S. Food & Drug Administration" in blue letters.
July 17, 2018
OrthoXel % Hollace Rhodes Director, Orthopedic Regulatory Affairs Musculoskeletal Clinical Regulatory Advisers LLC 1050 K Street NW Suite 1000 Washington, District of Columbia 20001
Re: K181375
Trade/Device Name: Apex Femoral Nailing System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3020 Regulation Name: Intramedullary Fixation Rod Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HSB, JDS Dated: May 23, 2018 Received: May 24, 2018
Dear Ms. Rhodes:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820);
{1}------------------------------------------------
and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
# Mark N. Melkerson -S
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K181375
### Device Name
Apex Femoral Nailing System
### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Apex Femoral Nailing system is intended for temporary fixation of the fractures of the femur. The Apex nail is indicated for used in adult patients for treatment of:
- · Open and closed fractures, including simple, severely comminuted, spiral, large oblique, and segmental fractures;
- · Fractures involving osteopenic or osteoporotic bone;
- · Fractures with bone loss;
- · Pseudoarthosis, nonunion, and malunion;
- · Correction osteotomy;
- · Pathologic fractures and prophylactic nailing of impending pathologic fractures;
- · Periprosthetic fractures;
- · Closed supracondylar fractures (retrograde only) and:
- · Intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures (antegrade only)
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
ري Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary for Apex Femoral Nail System
#### 1 Submission Sponsor
OrthoXel, Rubicon Centre, Bishopstown, Cork, Ireland, T12 Y275 Phone: +353 21 2429700
Contact: Aisling O'Sullivan QA/RA Director Email: aisling.osullivan@orthoxel.ie
#### 2 Prepared by
Musculoskeletal Clinical Regulatory Advisers, LLC 1050 K Street, NW, Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20001 Phone: 202.552.5800
Contact: Ms. Hollace Saas Rhodes Senior Director, Orthopedic Regulatory Affairs Email: hrhodes@mcra.com
#### 3 Date Prepared
July 6, 2018
#### 4 Device Name
| 4.1 | Trade/Proprietary Name: | Apex Femoral Nailing System |
|-----|----------------------------|-----------------------------|
| 4.2 | Common/Usual Name: | Femoral Nail |
| 4.3 | Classification Name: | Intramedullary Fixation Rod |
| 4.4 | Classification Regulation: | 21 CFR 888.3020 |
| 4.5 | Classification Panel: | Orthopedics |
| 4.6 | Product Codes: | HSB, JDS |
| 4.7 | Device Class: | II |
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### 5 Predicate Devices
The System is substantially equivalent to the Zimmer Natural Nail (K172114) based on similarities in intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.
#### ട Device Description
The Apex Femoral Nailing system is a femoral intramedullary fixation system designed to be implanted and interlocked proximally and distally using bone screws or a provided surgical instrumentation kit. Like many of the currently-marketed intramedullary nails, the Apex Nail offers several different proximal and distal locking options from which the surgeon may choose, depending on the fracture. An insert within the proximal nail stem maintains the high torsional stability of static locking when the construct is locked in a dynamization mode. The Apex Femoral Nailing System include a femoral nail, bone screws, bolts and endcaps of varying sizes. All parts of the system are manufactured from Titanium 6AL4VELi. The Apex Femoral Nail, screw, bolt and endcap are available in varying lengths and diameters.
#### 7 Intended Use
The Apex Femoral Nailing system is intended for temporary fixation of the fractures of the femur. The Apex nail is indicated for used in adult patients for treatment of:
- Open and closed fractures, including simple, severely comminuted, spiral, large oblique, and segmental fractures;
- Fractures involving osteopenic or osteoporotic bone;
- Fractures with bone loss;
- Pseudoarthrosis, nonunion, and malunion;
- Correction osteotomy;
- Pathologic fractures and prophylactic nailing of impending pathologic fractures;
- Periprosthetic fractures;
- Closed supracondylar fractures (retrograde only) and:
- Intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures (antegrade only)
#### 8 Technological Characteristics and Substantial Equivalence
The Apex Femoral Nailing System is substantially equivalent to the Zimmer Natural Nail, with respect to intended use, technological characteristics (components, materials, overall design, and dimensions), sterility, and principles of operation.
#### 9 Reference Devices
The Apex Tibial Nailing System (K170972) and NovaLign Intramedulary Fixation System (K083458) are included as reference devices based on similarities in raw materials, manufacturing steps and reagents, technological characteristics, and performance data.
{5}------------------------------------------------
## 10 Non-Clinical Performance Testing
The Apex Femoral Nailing System was tested in accordance with the following standards and all acceptance criteria were met:
- ASTM F1264-16 Standard specification and test methods for intramedullary fixation devices.
- ASTM F543-07 Standard specification and test methods for metallic medical bone screws.
- Full Construct Testing
- Bacterial Endotoxin Testing
#### 11 Conclusion
This 510(k) submission supports the substantial equivalence of the Apex Femoral Nailing System to the referenced predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.