K181366 · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · LPH · Sep 24, 2018 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K181366
Device Name
REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell
Applicant
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Product Code
LPH · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Sep 24, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3358
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell for use with the POLACUP Dual Mobility System is intended for single use only and is to be implanted without bone cement. The POLARCUP Dual Mobility System is to be implanted in the REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell with bone cement.
Device Story
The REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell is an acetabular hip cup prosthesis designed for cementless implantation. It is manufactured from titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) powder via additive manufacturing. The shell features screw holes for fixation and is designed to house the POLARCUP Dual Mobility System, which is cemented into the shell. The POLARCUP system consists of a stainless steel shell and a UHMWPE/XLPE liner. The device is used in orthopedic surgery to replace or reconstruct the hip joint. By providing a dual mobility option, the system aims to improve joint stability and reduce dislocation risk. Surgeons implant the shell into the acetabulum and cement the dual mobility liner within it, facilitating articulation between the liner and the polished inner surface of the metal shell.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Mechanical assessments included environmental corrosion fatigue, fatigue, post-fatigue push-out, lever-out, torque-to-failure, range of motion, and tolerance stack analysis. All tests met pre-determined acceptance criteria. Biocompatibility was evaluated per ISO 10993-1 for permanent (>30 day) body contact.
Technological Characteristics
REDAPT shell: Ti-6Al-4V alloy (ASTM F1472). POLARCUP shell: Stainless steel (ISO 5832-9). POLARCUP liner: UHMWPE/XLPE (ISO 5834-1/2). Additive manufacturing process for shell. Cementless shell fixation; cemented liner fixation. Permanent implant.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with advanced hip joint degeneration due to degenerative, post-traumatic, or rheumatoid arthritis; femoral head fracture or avascular necrosis; failure of previous hip surgeries (reconstruction, internal fixation, arthrodesis, hemiarthroplasty, surface replacement, or total hip replacement); all forms of osteoarthritis; hips at risk of dislocation; or femoral neck/proximal hip fractures.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained porous-coated uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across the joint. This generic type of device has a femoral component made of a cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (Co-Cr-Mo) alloy or a titanium-aluminum-vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy and an acetabular component composed of an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene articulating bearing surface fixed in a metal shell made of Co-Cr-Mo or Ti-6Al-4V. The femoral stem and acetabular shell have a porous coating made of, in the case of Co-Cr-Mo substrates, beads of the same alloy, and in the case of Ti-6Al-4V substrates, fibers of commercially pure titanium or Ti-6Al-4V alloy. The porous coating has a volume porosity between 30 and 70 percent, an average pore size between 100 and 1,000 microns, interconnecting porosity, and a porous coating thickness between 500 and 1,500 microns. The generic type of device has a design to achieve biological fixation to bone without the use of bone cement.
Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Cemented Constrained Liner (K072121)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
September 24, 2018
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logos of the Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health and Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo includes the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text. The logos are simple and professional, and they are easily recognizable.
Smith & Nephew, Inc. Bryan Cowell Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist 7135 Goodlett Farms Parkway Cordova, Tennessee 38016
### Re: K181366
Trade/Device Name: REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shells Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3358 Regulation Name: Hip Joint Metal/Polymer/Metal Semi-Constrained Porous-Coated Uncemented Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LPH, OQG, KWZ, LZO, JDI, KWY Dated: August 28, 2018 Received: August 29, 2018
# Dear Bryan Cowell:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.htm); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice
(https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Daniel S. Ramsey -S 2018.09.24 11:56:55 -04'00'
For Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K181366
Device Name REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell
Indications for Use (Describe)
* Advanced degeneration of the hip joint as a result of degenerative, post-traumatic or rheumatoid arthritis.
* Fracture or avascular necrosis of the femoral head
* Failure of previous hip surgery: joint reconstruction, internal fixation,
arthrodesis, hemiarthroplasty, surface replacement arthroplasty, or total hip replacement
* All forms of osteoarthritis
- * Patients with hips at risk of dislocation
* Femoral neck fracture or proximal fracture to hip joint
The REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell for use with the POLACUP Dual Mobility System is intended for single use only and is to be implanted without bone cement. The POLARCUP Dual Mobility System is to be implanted in the REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell with bone cement.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary Smith & Nephew REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shells
| SUBMITTER:<br>I. | Smith & Nephew, Inc.<br>Orthopaedic Division<br>7135 Goodlett Farms Parkway<br>Cordova, Tennessee 38016 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Phone: (901) 396-1633<br>Fax: (901) 566-7159 |
| | Contact Person: Michael Scott<br>Date Prepared: September 7, 2018 |
| II.<br>DEVICE | |
| Name of Device:<br>Common Name:<br>Regulatory Class: | REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shells<br>Acetabular Component<br>2 |
| Classification Name,<br>Regulation Number,<br>Product Codes, | Hip joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained porous-coated<br>uncemented prosthesis (CFR 888.3358) LPH<br>Hip joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained porous-coated<br>uncemented prosthesis (CFR 888.3358)OQG<br>Hip joint metal/polymer constrained cemented or uncemented<br>prosthesis (CFR 888.3310) KWZ<br>Hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or<br>nonporous uncemented prosthesis (CFR 888.3353) LZO<br>Hip joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis<br>(CFR 888.3350)JDI<br>Hip joint femoral (hemi-hip) metal/polymer cemented or<br>uncemented prosthesis (888-3390) KWY |
| PREDICATE DEVICE | Primary Predicate REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shells: K150790<br>(S.E. 11/16/2015)<br>Predicate 2: POLARCUP Dual Mobility System: K110135 (S.E.<br>10/14/2011)<br>Predicate 3: G7 Dual Mobility System: K150522 (S.E. 05/01/2015)<br>Predicate 4: Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System<br>Cemented Constrained Liner K072121 (S.E. 01/07/2008) |
The predicate devices have not been subject to a design related recall.
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION III.
The REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell is designed for cementless use on the boneinterfacing surface and is made from titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) powder through an additive manufacturing process. The device design allows for the cementing of liners into the shell and incorporates screw holes for fixation.
The POLARCUP Dual Mobility System consists of a metal shell and plastic liner (or insert). POLARCUP Shell is made from Stainless Steel. The inside of the metal shell is polished, and the outside of the plastic liner is able to articulate against this polished surface. The POLARCUP™ Dual Mobility System is an acetabular hip cup prosthesis.
The subject device consists of a REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell for use with the POLACUP Dual Mobility System. The REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell is intended to be implanted without bone cement. The POLARCUP Dual Mobility System is to be implanted in the REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell with bone cement.
The purpose of this 510(k) submission is to modify the indications for the REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell to allow for a dual mobility use when used with the POLARCUP Dual Mobility System.
#### INDICATIONS FOR USE IV.
- Advanced degeneration of the hip joint as a result of degenerative, post-traumatic or . rheumatoid arthritis.
- . Fracture or avascular necrosis of the femoral head
- Failure of previous hip surgery: joint reconstruction, internal fixation, arthrodesis, . hemiarthroplasty, surface replacement arthroplasty, or total hip replacement
- . All forms of osteoarthritis
- Patients with hips at risk of dislocation .
- . Femoral neck fracture or proximal fracture to hip joint
{5}------------------------------------------------
The REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell for use with the POLARCUP Dual Mobility System is intended for single use only and is to be implanted without bone cement. The POLARCUP Dual Mobility System is to be implanted in the REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell with bone cement.
### V. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
There are no technological differences between the subject and predicate REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shells K150790 (S.E. 11/16/2015).
There are no technological differences between the POLARCUP Dual Mobility System components and the previously cleared POLARCUP Dual Mobility System components K110135 (S.E. 10/14/2011).
To allow for a dual mobility option for the existing REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shells, this submission allows for the existing POLARCUP Dual Mobility System to be implanted in the REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shells with bone cement.
As the devices are identical to the existing 510(k) cleared devices, the technological characteristics assessed consisted of the compatibility of the two systems.
Bacterial endotoxin testing was completed and met the acceptable endotoxin limits as stated in the FDA Guidance , "Submission and Review of Sterility Information in Premarket Notification (510(k)) Submissions for Devices Labeled as Sterile," "Pyrogen and Endotoxins Testing: Questions and Answers," and ANSI/AAMI ST72.
Therefore, the technological characteristics of the subject device are the similar to the technological characteristics of the predicate devices REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shells (S.E. (K150790 (S.E. 11/16/2015) and POLARCUP Dual Mobility System (S.E. K150522 (S.E. 05/01/2015)).
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### VI. PERFORMANCE DATA
The following performance data are provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
# Biocompatibility
As part of the compatibility assessment, a biocompatibility evaluation was completed for the combination usage of non-cemented REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell with the cemented POLARCUP Dual Mobility System.
The biocompatibility evaluation for the combination usage of non-cemented REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell with the cemented POLARCUP Dual Mobility System was conducted in accordance with FDA's Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff "Use of International Standard ISO-10993, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process".
The subject REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell with the POLARCUP Dual Mobility System are permanent implants and will be classified as permanent, >30 day body contact according to ISO-10993, "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing within a Risk Management Process".
The subject REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shells are made of titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy. The material is considered surgical grade and meets ASTM F1472 standard specification. The Ti-6Al-4V alloy meets the quality and chemical composition given in Smith & Nephew Specifications.
The cemented POLARCUP Shell is made from Stainless Steel INOX M30NW meeting the requirement of ISO 5832-9. The POLARCUP XLPE Insert is made from ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and highly cross-linked UHMWPE (XLPE). The material is considered surgical grade meeting the requirements of ISO 5834-1/2. The quality and processing of the material is controlled by Smith and Nephew specifications.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Biocompatibility evaluation has been completed and a summary rationale has been provided for the subject LEGION Finned Tibial Wedges.
# Mechanical testing
To further support a determination of substantial equivalence, non-clinical bench (mechanical) testing was conducted on the proposed REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell with the cemented POLARCUP Dual Mobility System. Test results demonstrated that the proposed devices are substantially equivalent to the predicate REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell System.
Mechanical tests/assessments completed were:
- Environmental Corrosion Fatigue
- Fatigue .
- Post Fatigue Push-Out ●
- Lever Out ●
- Torque to Failure ●
- Range of Motion .
- Tolerance Stack Analysis ●
The subject devices with pre-determined acceptance criteria met the acceptance criteria for all outputs.
#### CONCLUSIONS VII.
Based on the verification evidence activities provided in the pre-market notification, the subject REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shell for use with the POLACUP Dual Mobility System is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate devices: REDAPT Porous Acetabular Shells: K150790 (S.E. 11/16/2015), POLARCUP Dual Mobility System: K110135 (S.E. 10/14/2011). G7 Dual Mobility System: K150522 (S.E. 05/01/2015) and Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Cemented Constrained Liner K072121 (S.E. 01/07/2008).
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.