K181192 · Hand Biomechanics Lab, Inc. · JEC · Oct 22, 2018 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K181192
Device Name
PIP Fix
Applicant
Hand Biomechanics Lab, Inc.
Product Code
JEC · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Oct 22, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3040
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The PIP Fix is indicated for the treatment of unstable dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the fingers in which external skeletal fixation as provided by the PIP Fix alone is sufficient to obtain and maintain concentric reduction of the fracture dislocation during bone and soft tissue healing.
Device Story
External skeletal fixator for unstable dorsal fracture dislocations of PIP joint; installed by surgeon in hospital. Device inputs: manual configuration of elastic band posts and tension settings. Principle: applies palmar translation and distal length restoration forces to middle phalanx via dorsal and transverse bone pins linked by elastic bands. Output: mechanical traction maintaining joint alignment during active finger flexion/extension. Surgeon adjusts force vector distribution by rotating posts and sets tension via screw. Benefits: restores joint alignment, enables motion during healing, addresses both acute and chronic dislocations. Worn for 6-8 weeks.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Computational analysis compared force performance and bending stress on dorsal pins between subject and predicate devices. Bacterial Endotoxin Testing (BET) performed on implantable components; results were below the FDA recommended limit of 20.0 EU/device.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: 316L stainless steel (ASTM F138) bone pins, Ultem plastic. Energy: Mechanical (elastic bands). Form factor: External fixator system with bone pins, posts, and tension screws. Connectivity: None. Sterilization: Gamma irradiation. Single-use.
Indications for Use
Indicated for treatment of unstable dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the fingers requiring external skeletal fixation to obtain and maintain concentric reduction during healing.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A smooth or threaded metallic bone fixation fastener is a device intended to be implanted that consists of a stiff wire segment or rod made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum and stainless steel, and that may be smooth on the outside, fully or partially threaded, straight or U-shaped; and may be either blunt pointed, sharp pointed, or have a formed, slotted head on the end. It may be used for fixation of bone fractures, for bone reconstructions, as a guide pin for insertion of other implants, or it may be implanted through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
October 22, 2018
Hand Biomechanics Lab, Inc. Dustin Dequine Operations Manager 77 Scripps Drive, Suite 104 Sacramento, California 95825
Re: K181192
Trade/Device Name: PIP Fix Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3040 Regulation Name: Smooth Or Threaded Metallic Bone Fixation Fastener Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JEC Dated: October 17, 2018 Received: October 19, 2018
Dear Dustin Dequine:
We have reviewed vour Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.html; good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803). please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Peter G. Allen -S 2018.10.22 09:49:51 -04'00'
- FOR Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K181192
Device Name
PIP Fix
Indications for Use (Describe)
The PIP Fix is indicated for the treatment of unstable dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the fingers in which external skeletal fixation as provided by the PIP Fix alone is sufficient to obtain and maintain concentric reduction of the fracture dislocation during bone and soft tissue healing.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-size: 20px;">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Hand Biomechanics Lab. The logo features a stylized blue hand with five fingers, positioned to the left of the text. A curved line partially encircles the hand, adding a sense of motion or measurement. The text "Hand Biomechanics Lab" is arranged in a stacked format to the right of the hand graphic.
# 510(k) Summary
| I. | Submitter | Hand Biomechanics Lab, Inc.<br>77 Scripps Drive, Suite 104<br>Sacramento, CA 95825-6209<br><br>Telephone: (916) 923-5073<br>Facsimile: (916) 920-2215<br><br>Contact Person: Dustin Dequine<br>Email: ddequine@handbiolab.com<br><br>Date Prepared: October 17, 2018 |
|------|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| II. | Device | Trade Name: PIP Fix<br>Model Number: PFX-426<br>Common Name: External Fixator System<br>Classification Name: Component, Traction, Invasive [21CFR 888.3040,<br>Product Code JEC] |
| III. | Predicate Device | F3 Fractured Finger Fixator (Turnkey FCS), K072432<br>This predicate has not been subject to a design related recall. |
## IV. Device Description
The PIP Fix is an external skeletal fixator designed to obtain and maintain concentric reduction of an unstable dorsal fracture dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. This device is capable of exerting both palmar translation and distal length restoration forces on the middle phalanx while simultaneously lifting the distal end of the proximal phalanx to restore joint alignment. With the dorsal dislocation of the middle phalanx reduced, the fractured fragments of the joint surface are reopposed. The effect of the PIP Fix is present throughout the complete range of finger motion allowing full active flexion and extension during healing of the bone and soft tissues.
The PIP Fix is installed by a surgeon in a healthcare facility / hospital environment. Included with the gamma irradiated, sterile PIP Fix is a Pin Placement Guide that allows for a Transverse Bone Pin to be accurately placed through the axis of PIP joint rotation. A Dorsal Bone Pin is inserted vertically into the middle phalanx. The device is installed on the Dorsal Bone Pin and is linked to the Transverse Bone Pin with Elastic Bands. These bands provide the translating forces that hold the joint concentrically reduced. The device enables the surgeon to determine the distribution of the direction of the forces between palmar translation and distal length restoration. This is accomplished by rotating the Elastic Band posts about an arc concentric with the PIP joint axis such that the force vector resolution may be purely in a palmar translation direction or a combination of palmar translation and length restoration. An Angle Lock Screw locks the device in the chosen position to maintain the force distribution. A Tension Adjust Screw on the PIP Fix allows the surgeon to adjust the amount of tension in the Elastic Bands so they exert the least amount of tension necessary to maintain joint alignment.
The PIP Fix is manufactured using metal and Ultem plastic. The Bone Pins are fabricated from 316L stainless steel per ASTM F138. Both latex and non-latex elastic bands are supplied with the device. All components are designed for single use only. The device is typically worn for 6 to 8 weeks depending on the rate of healing and the surgeon's assessment of the same. During this time, the Bone Pins are the only portion of the device contacting or penetrating the skin in a non-transient manner.
For reference, below is an illustration of the sterile components provided with the PIP Fix. The sterile Elastic Bands are omitted for clarity from the illustration.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Hand Biomechanics Lab. The logo features a stylized blue hand with a gray arc behind it. To the right of the hand is the text "Hand Biomechanics Lab" in a sans-serif font, with "Hand" on the top line, "Biomechanics" on the second line, and "Lab" on the third line. The text is also in blue.
Image /page/4/Figure/2 description: This image shows a diagram of a surgical tool kit. The kit includes a pin cut off spacer, dorsal pin, dorsal pre-drill, hex wrench, PIP fix, pin caps, pin placement guide, pin cap applicator, and transverse pin. The diagram is labeled with the names of each tool.
## V. Indications for Use
The PIP Fix is indicated for the treatment of unstable dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the finqers in which external skeletal fixation as provided by the PIP Fix alone is sufficient to obtain and maintain concentric reduction of the fracture dislocation during bone and soft tissue healing.
The Indications for Use statement for the PIP Fix device is not identical to the predicate device; however, the differences do not alter the intended surgical use of the device nor do they affect the safety and effectiveness of the device relative to the predicate. Both the subject and predicate devices have the same intended use to treat unstable dorsal fracture dislocations of the PIP joint by applying forces directly to the proximal and middle phalanges to restore joint alignment. The predication for Use is limited to "acute" unstable fracture dislocations of the PIP joint. This limitation resulted because the predicate device provided an insufficient length restoration force to consistently be effective for "chronic" dorsal fracture dislocations. That limitation was removed from the subject device Indication for Use because of its ability to provide a greater length restoration force sufficient to allow its use for "chronic" dorsal fracture dislocations. This was the design intent of the PIP Fix based on surgeon feedback and other inputs because certain patients require greater length restoration force to obtain and maintain both PIP joint and fracture reduction.
## VI. Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device:
The PIP Fix is comparable to the predicate device with respect to function and application technique. Both are indicated for unstable dorsal fracture dislocations of the PIP joint and are attached to the finger using bone pins. Both use elastic bands to apply reduction forces across the PIP joint. The PIP Fix is capable of applying a greater length restoration force. The PIP Fix and predicate device are both made of the same plastic and metal components. Both are delivered to the customer sterile.
For comparison, the sterile components provided in the subject and predicate device are illustrated below (subject left, predicate right). The Pin Placement guide, Pin Cut Off Spacer, Dorsal Pre-Drill, Hex Wrench, Pin Caps, Transverse Pin, Pin Cap Applicator and Elastic Bands (not shown) are identical between both products. The threads of the Dorsal Pin of the subject device extend further up the pin.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo for the Hand Biomechanics Lab. The logo features a stylized blue hand with a gray arc behind it. To the right of the hand is the text "Hand Biomechanics Lab" in a sans-serif font, with each word on a separate line.
Image /page/5/Figure/2 description: The image shows a diagram of a surgical instrument with various components labeled. The components include a pin cut off spacer, dorsal pre-drill, dorsal pin, hex wrench, PIP fix, pin caps, transverse pin, pin placement guide, and pin cap applicator. The diagram provides a detailed view of the instrument's assembly and the function of each component.
The primary technological difference lies in the device itself. The illustrations below show the device installed on the finger with the subject on the right. For simplicity, both devices are shown configured for palmar translation without length restoration forces.
Image /page/5/Figure/4 description: The image shows four different diagrams of a finger with a medical device attached to it. The device appears to be some sort of external fixator or traction device used to stabilize or manipulate the finger. The diagrams show the device from different angles, highlighting its components and how it interacts with the finger. The device consists of metal bars, screws, and hinges that are connected to the finger at different points.
In the above configuration, the subject and predicate devices function identically. The subject device has the added capability of repositioning the elastic band posts to alter the direction of force. This force vector may be resolved into a palmar translation force and length restoration force as illustrated below. In the palmar translation illustration, the force vector arrow points down indicating the force applied to the middle phalanx translates it palmarly relative to the proximal phalanx. In the palmar translation with length restoration illustration, the force vector is resolved into two orthogonal directions.
Image /page/5/Picture/6 description: The image shows two diagrams of a finger being manipulated with a device. The device appears to be a clamp with a screw mechanism that applies pressure to the finger joint. The text "Palmar Translation" is present, suggesting the type of manipulation being performed. Arrows in the second diagram indicate the direction of force being applied to the joint.
Palmar Translation with Length Restoration
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image is a logo for the Hand Biomechanics Lab. The logo features a blue hand with a gray arc above it. To the right of the hand is the text "Hand Biomechanics Lab" in a sans-serif font. The text is also blue, matching the color of the hand.
#### VII. Performance Data
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
## Computational Analyses
Both the predicate and subject devices utilize forces produced by elastic bands to obtain and maintain PIP joint and fracture reduction. Computational analysis of the force performance of the PIP Fix is comparable to the predicate devices are placed in the palmar translation only positions. The PIP Fix applies more length restoration force (5 times greater) than the predicate device when the devices are placed in the "translation & length restoration force" positions.
The dorsal pin for the PIP Fix is the same as the one used for the predicate device with the exception the threads extend further up the shaft. However, the overall length, minor and major diameters, and pitch are identical. Therefore, the only potential new failure mode related to the pin involves the side loading resulting from the length restoration force being greater for the PIP Fix. A computational analysis of the nominal bending stress on the dorsal pin as a result of the increased length restoration force indicated a 5x increase in bending stress for the PIP Fix. However, this increased stress still remains significantly below the pin material yield strength.
## Bacterial Endotoxin Testing
A Bacterial Endotoxins Test (BET) was performed on the implantable components of the subject device. The results indicated that the detected endotoxin levels were less than the FDA guidance recommended endotoxin limit of 20.0 EU/device.
#### VIII.Conclusions
The predicate and subject devices operate under similar technological and funciples using similar materials. Additionally, the predicate device has been legally marketed and sold for many years and historical feedback trended. It is in part due to this feedback, in fact, that the subject device was developed to address an unmet need from the surgical community of users. The proven history of the predicate device and similarity to the subject device demonstrate that the PIP Fix should perform as intended in the specified use conditions safely and effectively for the same intended use.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.