Intracept Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System (component Intracept RF Probe)
Applicant
Relievant Medsystems
Product Code
GXI · Neurology
Decision Date
Sep 14, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.4725
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Intracept Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System is intended to be used in conjunction with radiofrequency (RF) generators for the ablation of basivertebral nerves of the L3 through S1 vertebrae for the relief of chronic low back pain of at least six months duration that has not responded to at least six months of conservative care, and is also accompanied by either Type 1 or Type 2 Modic changes on an MRI.
Device Story
Intracept System is a sterile, single-use radiofrequency (RF) ablation device used to treat chronic low back pain. It consists of access instruments (introducers, cannulas, stylets) and an RF probe. Procedure: physician uses access instruments via transpedicular or extrapedicular approach to create a channel into the vertebral body to the basivertebral foramen; RF probe is inserted into this channel; controlled bipolar RF energy is delivered to ablate the basivertebral nerve (85°C for 15 minutes). The device includes a safety tether for tip retention and a SensTx chip for treatment parameter storage/recognition by the Relievant RF Generator. Output is thermal ablation of the nerve, intended to provide pain relief. Used in clinical settings by physicians.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical testing was performed; substantial equivalence is supported by bench testing only.
Technological Characteristics
Bipolar RF ablation probe; stainless steel and Polyether Block Amide construction; 335mm length, 1.98mm diameter; 4mm distal tip; thermocouple-based temperature monitoring; EtO sterilization. Connectivity includes integrated cable and SensTx microchip for RF generator communication. Complies with ISO 10993 (biocompatibility), IEC 60601-1 (electrical safety), IEC 60601-2-2 (HF surgical equipment), and IEC 62366-1 (usability).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with chronic low back pain (≥6 months) unresponsive to ≥6 months of conservative care, with Type 1 or Type 2 Modic changes on MRI, requiring ablation of basivertebral nerves (L3-S1).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A radiofrequency lesion probe is a device connected to a radiofrequency (RF) lesion generator to deliver the RF energy to the site within the nervous system where a lesion is desired.
Predicate Devices
Intracept Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System (K153272)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is in blue and includes the letters "FDA" followed by the words "U.S. Food & Drug Administration" in a sans-serif font. The word "Administration" is on a separate line below "U.S. Food & Drug".
September 14, 2018
Relievant Medsystems Alex DiNello Chief Operating Officer 385 Moffett Park Drive, Suite 105 Sunnyvale, California 94089
Re: K180369
Trade/Device Name: Intracept Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System (component Intracept RF Probe) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4725 Regulation Name: Radiofrequency lesion probe Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GXI Dated: August 13, 2018 Received: August 15, 2018
# Dear Alex DiNello:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.htm); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice
(https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
> Sincerely. Matthew C. Krueger -S
for Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K180369
Device Name
Intracept Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Intracept Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System is intended to be used in conjunction with radiofrequency (RF) generators for the ablation of basivertebral nerves of the L3 through S1 vertebrae for the relief of chronic low back pain of at least six months duration that has not responded to at least six months of conservative care, and is also accompanied by either Type 1 or Type 2 Modic changes on an MRI.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-size:100%;">☒</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style="font-size:100%;">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) SUMMARY
#### Applicant's Name and Address:
Relievant Medsystems, Inc. 385 Moffett Park Drive, Suite 105 Sunnyvale, CA 94089-1218
| Contact Person: | Laurie Hook |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Telephone: | 650/368-1000 |
| Facsimile: | 650/298-9205 |
| Date Prepared: | August 13, 2018 |
| Device Name: | |
| Device Generic Name: | RF Ablation Catheter and Accessories |
| Device Trade Name: | Intracept® Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System |
| Device Classification: | II |
| Classification Name: | Radiofrequency lesion probe<br>21 CFR 882.4725, Product Code GXI |
### Predicate Device:
Relievant Medsystems, Inc .: Intracept Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System (K153272)
### Device Description:
The Intracept Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System (Intracept System) is comprised of two sterile, single-use components:
- . The Intracept Access Instruments include introducers, cannulas and stylets that provide access to the intended site of radiofrequency (RF) ablation.
- . The Intracept RF Probe conducts RF energy to the target location.
To obtain the energy needed for tissue ablation, the Intracept RF Probe is used with the Relievant RF Generator (RFG).
The Intracept System technique uses RF ablation of the basivertebral nerve for relief of chronic low back pain and involves a two-step process. First, utilizing the Access Instruments, based on a minimally invasive, transpedicular or extrapedicular approach, a cannula and stylets are placed into the vertebral body to create a path or channel to the terminus of the basivertebral foramen. The RF Probe is then placed into this channel at the terminus of the basivertebral foramen and controlled RF energy is delivered to ablate the basivertebral nerve. This nerve has been identified as a proprioceptive sensory nerve with enervation of the vertebral endplates.
### Indications for Use
The Intracept Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System is intended to be used in conjunction with radiofrequency (RF) generators for the ablation of basivertebral nerves of the L3 through S1 vertebrae for the relief of chronic low back pain of at least six months duration that has not responded to at least six months of conservative care and is also accompanied by either Type 1 or Type 2 Modic changes on an MRI.
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Substantial Equivalence
The subject device (Intracept RF Probe -- a component of the Intracept System) has the same intended use, has a similar overall design, and has the same operational characteristics as the predicate device (Flexible Bi-Polar RF Probe). Differences between the RF Probe devices do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness for the subject device. In this submission, no modifications were made to the Intracept System's Access Instruments.
| Characteristic | Relievant Medsystems<br>Subject: | Relievant Medsystems<br>Predicate: | Comparison |
|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
| Device Component | Intracept RF Probe | Intracept Flexible Bi-Polar RF Probe (K153272) | |
| Intended Use | To ablate the basivertebral nerves of the L3 to S1 vertebrae | | Same |
| Indication | The INTRACEPT Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System is intended to be used in conjunction with RF generators for the ablation of basivertebral nerves of the L3 through S1 vertebrae for the relief of chronic low back pain of at least six months duration that has not responded to at least six months of conservative care, and is also accompanied by either Type 1 or Type 2 Modic changes on an MRI. | | Same |
| Principle | Provide bipolar RF energy to the tissue between and around the electrodes to achieve tissue ablation (i.e., cellular necrosis through thermal ablation) | | Same |
| Probe Shaft Length/Diameter | 335mm/1.98mm | 335mm/1.98mm | Same |
| Distal Tip Length | 4mm | 4mm | Same |
| Electrodes | Two | Two | Same |
| Safety cable | Tether welded to distal electrode ensures the electrode tip is retained for device removal | -- | Different |
| Tip temperature monitor/control | Thermocouple at distal tip | Thermocouple at distal tip | Same |
| SensTx Chip | Treatment parameters stored on microchip in RF Probe Handle | -- | Different |
| Treatment Parameters<br>Temperature<br>Ramp<br>Time | 85° C<br>1°C/second<br>15 minutes (900 seconds) | 85° C<br>1°C/second<br>15 minutes (900 seconds) | Same<br>Same<br>Same |
| Indicators | Circumferential markings (exit of Curved Cannula and clearance for electrode)<br>Light Ring | Circumferential markings (exit of Curved Cannula and clearance for electrode) | Different |
| Materials: Patient Contact | Stainless steel and Polyether Block Amide | Stainless steel and Polyether Block Amide | Same |
| Connect to RFG | Cable integrated with RF Probe | Separate cable | Different |
| Sterilization | Ethylene Oxide (EtO) | Ethylene Oxide (EtO) | Same |
| Use | Single | Single | Same |
{5}------------------------------------------------
## Non-Clinical Performance Testing
Testing of the Intracept RF Probe demonstrated that the device met specifications and performane requirements, and supports demonstration of equivalence to the predicate device. Performance testing of the subject device was completed as follows:
| Test | Test Method Summary | Results |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|
| Biocompatibility Testing | Patient contact materials are classified as tissue/bone/dentin <24 hours and tested for compliance to applicable ISO 10993 standards. The subject device is the same classification as the predicate and the materials used in construction are equivalent. | |
| Cytotoxicity | RF Probe Tip: ≤ 24 hour contact with Tissue/Bone/Dentin<br>ISO 10993-5 – Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices –<br>Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity (MEM Elusion) | PASS |
| Sensitization | ISO 10993-10 – Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices –<br>Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization (Guinea Pig Maximization Sensitization) | PASS |
| Acute Systemic Toxicity | ISO 10993-11 – Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices –<br>Part 11: Tests for systemic toxicity (Acute Systemic Injection Test in Mice) | PASS |
| Intracutaneous Reactivity | ISO 10993-10 – Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices –<br>Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization<br>(Intracutaneous Reactivity Irritation Test in Rabbits) | PASS |
| Cytotoxicity | RF Probe Handle: ≤ 24 hour contact with Intact Skin<br>ISO 10993-5 - Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices –<br>Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity (MEM Elusion) | PASS |
| Sensitization | ISO 10993-10 – Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices –<br>Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization (Guinea Pig Maximization Sensitization) | PASS |
| Intracutaneous Reactivity | ISO 10993-10 – Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices -<br>Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization<br>(Intracutaneous Reactivity Irritation Test in Rabbits) | PASS |
| Functional Testing | The subject and predicate devices are equivalent in size, materials and construction. | |
| Corrosion | Corrosion testing per ISO 10555-1 Intravascular catheters –<br>Sterile and single-use catheters – Part 1: General requirements<br>(Annex A: No visible signs of corrosion) | PASS |
| Transit | ASTM D4169 - Standard Practice for<br>Performance Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems (DC<br>13, assurance level II) | PASS |
| Gross Leaks | ASTM F 2096 - Standard Test Method for Detecting Gross<br>Leaks in Packaging by Internal Pressurization (Bubble Test) | PASS |
| Seal Strength | ASTM F88/F88M - Standard Test Method for Seal Strength of<br>Flexible Barrier Materials (Seal peel ≥1.0 lbs/in) | PASS |
| Sterilization | ISO-11135 – Sterilization of Health Care Products - Ethylene<br>Oxide - Requirements for the Development, Validation, and<br>Routine Control of a Sterilization Process for Medical Devices | PASS |
| Test | Test Method Summary | Results |
| compliance with the electrical safety standard; results demonstrated equivalence. | | |
| Electrical | IEC 60601-1 Medical electrical equipment Part 1: General<br>requirements for basic safety and essential performance and IEC<br>60601-2-2 Medical electrical equipment-Part 2-2: Particular<br>requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of<br>high frequency surgical equipment and high frequency surgical<br>accessories | PASS |
| Electromagnetic<br>Compatibility (EMC) | IEC 60601-1-2 Medical electric equipment-Part 1-2: General<br>requirements of safety-Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic<br>compatibility-Requirements and Tests | PASS |
| Interface and Primary Operating Function Testing | | |
| The subject and predicate devices have equivalent performance. | | |
| SensTx® Chip | Assessed use with Relievant RFG software recognition and<br>integration of SensTx Chip | PASS |
| Programmable Electrical<br>Medical Systems (PEMS) | IEC 60601-1 Medical electrical equipment Part 1: General<br>requirements for basic safety and essential performance | PASS |
| Simulated Use with<br>Mechanical Testing | Met performance specifications for mechanical durability and<br>simulated use, as well as compatibility with Access<br>Instruments. | PASS |
| Usability | IEC 62366-1: Application of Usability Engineering to Medical<br>Devices and IEC 60601-1-6 Medical Electrical Equipment – Part<br>1-6: General Requirements for basic safety and essential<br>performance - Collateral Standard: Usability | PASS |
| The subject and predicate devices are used with the same Relievant RF Generator and were evaluated for
{6}------------------------------------------------
No modifications were made to the Intracept Access Instruments; therefore, previous testing remains applicable.
### Clinical Performance Testing
Substantial equivalence is not dependent upon clinical data and no clinical testing was performed.
### Conclusions
Based upon device comparison and non-clinical performance testing, the Intracept System with the RF Probe and Access Instruments is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate device (Intracept System with the Flexible Bi-Polar RF Probe and Access Instruments) and any differences in design or technologic characteristics do not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness. All test requirements were met and results support the substantial equivalence of the subject and predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.