ATS Thermal Imaging Probe, ATS Patient Interface Unit
K180148 · Securus Medical Group, Inc. · FLL · Mar 21, 2018 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K180148
Device Name
ATS Thermal Imaging Probe, ATS Patient Interface Unit
Applicant
Securus Medical Group, Inc.
Product Code
FLL · General Hospital
Decision Date
Mar 21, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 880.2910
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The ATS Thermal Imaging Probe is intended for continuous esophageal temperature monitoring. The ATS Patient Interface Unit is intended to display continuous temperature measurements (C°) from the ATS Thermal Imaging Probe.
Device Story
Aurora Thermographic System (ATS) consists of an esophageal temperature probe and a patient interface unit. The probe, a 9 French catheter, contains a T-type thermocouple for direct temperature measurement and a thermographic sensor with fiber optic assembly for passive collection of infrared radiation from esophageal tissue. The interface unit processes these inputs to display temperature in °C and streams thermal image data via a DVI port to an auxiliary monitor. Used in clinical settings by healthcare providers for continuous monitoring. The system provides real-time temperature data to assist in clinical decision-making and patient management. Modifications from the predicate include integrating two connectors into one, shortening the probe length, and updating the interface unit housing and software to support a touch screen.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance validated against ISO 80601-2-56:2017 for clinical thermometers. Testing included thermocouple accuracy (± 0.3°C), transient response time (< 2.5 seconds), infrared temperature accuracy (± 2°C), tensile strength of connections, biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1), electrical safety (IEC 60601-1), and EMC (IEC 60601-1-2). Software validation performed per ANSI/AAMI/IEC 62304.
Technological Characteristics
9 French catheter probe; materials include polyethylene and polyethylene copolymer with BaSO4. Sensing: T-type thermocouple for contact temperature; Stirling cooled MCT detector for infrared imaging (8-14µm spectral response). Connectivity: DVI port for auxiliary monitor. Power: 100-240 Vac. Standards: ISO 80601-2-56, IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, ISO 10993-1. Software: Validated per ANSI/AAMI/IEC 62304.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring continuous esophageal temperature monitoring.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A clinical electronic thermometer is a device used to measure the body temperature of a patient by means of a transducer coupled with an electronic signal amplification, conditioning, and display unit. The transducer may be in a detachable probe with or without a disposable cover.
Special Controls
(1) Device is not a clinical thermometer with telethermographic functions;
(2) Device is not a clinical thermometer with continuous temperature measurement functions; and
(3) Appropriate analysis and testing (such as that outlined in the currently FDA-recognized editions, as appropriate, of ISO 80601-2-56, “Medical electrical equipment—Part 2-56: Particular requirements for basic safety and essential performance of clinical thermometers for body temperature measurement,” or ASTM E1965, “Standard Specification for Infrared Thermometers for Intermittent Determination of Patient Temperature,” or ASTM E1112, “Standard Specification for Electronic Thermometer for Intermittent Determination of Patient Temperature,” or ASTM E1104, “Standard Specification for Clinical Thermometer Probe Covers and Sheaths”) must validate specifications and performance of the device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health and Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo features the letters 'FDA' in a blue square, followed by the words 'U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION' in blue text.
March 21, 2018
Securus Medical Group, Inc. William J. Gorman Director of Quality and Regulatory Affairs 100 Cummings Center, Suite 215F Beverly, Massachusetts 01915
Re: K180148
Trade/Device Name: ATS Thermal Imaging Probe, ATS Patient Interface Unit Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.2910 Regulation Name: Clinical Electronic Thermometer Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FLL Dated: February 20, 2018 Received: February 21, 2018
Dear Mr. William J. Gorman:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Tina Kiang
s
Tina Kiang, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K180148
Device Name
ATS Thermal Imaging Probe, ATS Patient Interface Unit
Indications for Use (Describe)
The ATS Thermal Imaging Probe is intended for continuous esophageal temperature monitoring.
The ATS Patient Interface Unit is intended to display continuous temperature measurements (C°) from the ATS Thermal Imaging Probe.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span>☑</span> <span>Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)</span> </div> | <div> <span>☐</span> <span>Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)</span> </div> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
In accordance with 21 CFR 807.87(h) and 21 CFR 807.92, the 510(k) Summary for the Aurora Thermographic System (ATS) made up of the ATS Thermal Imaging Probe and the ATS Patient Interface Unit is provided below.
## 1) Submitter
Securus Medical Group, Inc. 100 Cummings Center Suite 215F Beverly, MA 01915
978-317-0836 Phone: Contact: William J. Gorman Date Prepared: March 15, 2018
#### 2) Device
| Trade name: | ATS Thermal Imaging Probe<br>ATS Patient Interface Unit |
|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
Clinical Electronic Thermometer Common name:
#### Classification Number/ Classification name/Product code:
Clinical Electronic Thermometers are Class II devices under 21 CFR § 880.2910 and are classified by the General Hospital Panel. Product code - FLL.
#### 3) Predicate Device
InfraRed Thermographic System (IRTS), (K152402).
Reference Device: None
#### 4) Device Description
The Securus Aurora Thermographic System (ATS) is an esophageal temperature probe and monitoring system intended for continuous temperature monitoring of the patient's esophagus. The Probe includes a thermocouple sensor for temperature monitoring and a thermographic sensor for thermal imaging. Data from both sensors are displayed on the Patient Interface Unit.
Aurora Thermographic System (ATS) consists of two components:
- A. ATS Thermal Imaging Probe
- B. ATS Patient Interface Unit
The ATS Thermal Imaging Probe provides esophageal temperature monitoring through the use of a standard thermocouple mounted in a flexible 9 French catheter. This design is standard for esophageal temperature probes commonly used in the industry. In addition, the ATS Thermal Imaging Probe incorporates a thermographic sensor and fiber optic assembly to passively collect the infrared radiation that is self-emanating from the surrounding esophageal tissue surface. The ATS Patient Interface Unit displays temperature measurements (°C) from the ATS Thermal
{4}------------------------------------------------
Imaging Probe. The ATS Patient Interface Unit has a Digital Video (DVI) port for streaming thermal image data to an auxiliary monitor (not offered with the system).
## 5) Indications for Use
The ATS Thermal Imaging Probe is intended for continuous esophageal temperature monitoring.
The ATS Patient Interface Unit is intended to display continuous esophageal temperature measurements (°C) from the ATS Thermal Imaging Probe.
## 6) Comparison of Technological Characteristics
The proposed Aurora Thermographic System (ATS) is a modification of the Securus Infrared Thermographic System (IRTS). Both systems include a 9 French Clinical Thermometer designed to provide continuous direct mode esophageal temperature monitoring through the use of a standard T-type thermocouple. In addition, both systems incorporate the identical infrared thermographic technology for quantifying surface temperature changes in the esophagus. Infrared accuracy and resolution are unchanged. The indications for use, intended use, temperature measurement technology and route of administration remain identical for the two systems.
The modifications involve hardware integration, software and packaging of the ATS Patient Interface Unit and ATS Thermal Imaging Probe.
| Technological Characteristics Comparison Table | | | |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| | ATS Thermal Imaging Probe<br>ATS Patient Interface Unit | IRTS System (K152402) | Discussion |
| | Modified Device | Predicate Device | |
| Intended Use | Continuous temperature monitoring of<br>the patient's esophagus. | Continuous temperature monitoring of<br>the patient's esophagus. | Identical |
| Indications for Use | The ATS Thermal Imaging Probe<br><br>is intended for continuous esophageal<br>temperature monitoring.<br><br>The ATS Patient Interface Unit<br><br>is intended to display continuous<br>temperature measurements (C°) from<br>the ATS Thermal Imaging Probe. | The IRTS Probe<br><br>is intended for continuous esophageal<br>temperature monitoring.<br><br>The IRTS Patient Monitoring Unit<br>(PMU) with Patient Interface Unit<br>(PIU)<br><br>is intended to display continuous<br>temperature measurements (C°) from<br>the IRTS Thermal Imaging Probe. | Identical |
| System Components | Temperature Probe 9 French<br>Patient Interface Unit (PIU) | Temperature Probe 9 French<br>Patient Interface Unit (PIU)<br>Patient Monitoring Unit (PMU) | Similar |
| Probe Sterility | Provided non-sterile | Provided non-sterile | Identical |
| Route of Insertion | Oral or Nasal | Oral or Nasal | Identical |
| Probe Material<br>(patient contact) | Polyethylene and Polyethylene<br>copolymer with BaSO4 | Polyethylene and platinum | Similar |
| Technological Characteristics Comparison Table | | | |
| | ATS Thermal Imaging Probe<br>ATS Patient Interface Unit | IRTS System (K152402) | Discussion |
| | Modified Device | Predicate Device | |
| Probe Size | 9 French catheter | 9 French catheter | Identical |
| Probe Length | 108 cm length | 150 cm length | Similar |
| Temperature<br>Precision and<br>Resolution | 0.1° C | 0.1° C | Identical |
| Temperature Sensor | Type-T thermocouple | Type-T thermocouple | Identical |
| Thermocouple<br>Sensor Signal<br>Processing and<br>Display | Temperature is a function of<br>thermocouple voltage<br>Temperature displayed in 0.1° C<br>increments | Temperature is a function of<br>thermocouple voltage<br>Temperature displayed in 0.1° C<br>increments | Identical |
| Thermocouple<br>Sensor Range | 25° - 45° C | 25° - 45° C | Identical |
| Thermocouple<br>Sensor Accuracy | ± 0.3° C<br>tested in accordance with ISO 80601-2-56 | ± 0.3° C<br>tested in accordance with ISO 80601-2-56 | Identical |
| Transient Response<br>Time of<br>Temperature Sensor | Both heating transient response time<br>and cooling transient response time are<br>less than 2.5 seconds: time for probe<br>plunged from reference bath to a water<br>bath with a 2° C differential.<br>Tested in accordance with ISO 80601-<br>2-56 | Both heating transient response time<br>and cooling transient response time are<br>less than 2.5 seconds: time for probe<br>plunged from reference bath to a water<br>bath with a 2° C differential.<br>Tested in accordance with ISO 80601-<br>2-56 | Identical |
| Infrared Detector<br>Technology | Stirling cooled MCT | Stirling cooled MCT | Identical |
| Infrared Signal<br>Processing and<br>Display | Relative display of color graphical<br>image representing infrared radiation<br>emitted from the body. | Relative display of color graphical<br>image representing infrared radiation<br>emitted from the body. | Identical |
| Infrared<br>Temperature Range | Rated Output Range: -10°C to +70°C<br>Extended Output Range -20°C to -10°C<br>Spectral response 8-14µm | Rated Output Range: 35° to 60°C<br>No extended output range offered<br>Spectral response 8-11µm | Similar |
| Infrared<br>Temperature<br>Accuracy | ± 2°C in the Rated Output Range | ± 2°C in the Rated Output Range | Identical |
| Technological Characteristics Comparison Table | | | |
| | ATS Thermal Imaging Probe<br>ATS Patient Interface Unit<br>Modified Device | IRTS System (K152402)<br>Predicate Device | Discussion |
| Infrared<br>Temperature<br>Resolution | 0.1°C | 0.1° C | Identical |
| Infrared Image<br>Field of View | 360° | 360° | Identical |
| Thermal Image Size | 128 x 60 array | 128 x 60 array | Identical |
| Power Supply | 100-240 Vac AC integrated power<br>supply 24 VDC | 100-240 Vac AC adaptor power supply<br>24 VDC | Identical |
| Electrical Safety<br>and<br>Electromagnetic<br>Compatibility | Fully complies with IEC<br>60601-1:2005 +A1:2012<br>IEC 60601-1-2:2014 | Fully complies with IEC<br>60601-1:2005 +A1:2012<br>IEC 60601-1-2:2007 | Identical |
| Data Output | Data provided to a monitor for display. | Data provided to a monitor for display. | Identical |
{5}------------------------------------------------
{6}------------------------------------------------
The subject Aurora Thermographic System (ATS) is identical to the predicate device in the following areas:
- Identical Indications for Use and Intended Use ●
- Identical temperature monitoring technology
- Identical catheter diameter and route of administration ●
- Identical accuracy, resolution and response time ●
The primary differences between the proposed Aurora Thermographic System (ATS) and its predicate are the integration of two electronic devices into a single unit package and the related ATS Thermal Imaging Probe changes.
The predicate system includes 3 components.
- IRTS Thermal Imaging Probe
- IRTS Patient Monitoring Unit ●
- IRTS Patient Interface Unit ●
The modified Aurora Thermographic System (ATS) includes 2 components.
- ATS Thermal Imaging Probe ●
- ATS Patient Interface Unit ●
The ATS Thermal Imaging Probe incorporates a modification of the connection to the ATS Patient Interface Unit. The predicate IRTS Thermal Imaging Probe has two separate connectors, one for the thermocouple and one for the infrared measurement. The modified ATS Thermal Imaging Probe integrates the same thermocouple connector with the infrared connector to form a single connection. The ATS Thermal Imaging Probe length has been shortened from 150 cm to 108 cm.
{7}------------------------------------------------
The infrared temperature range reported to the user has been modified from 35° - 60°C to -20°C -70°C. The infrared detector is unchanged and collects the same infrared energy as the predicate. The modified ATS Patient Interface Unit software allows more infrared data to be displayed.
The impact of each modification has been evaluated using the Securus Risk Management and Design Control systems. Each modification was considered for its impact. All verification testing (non-clinical, performance, and software validation) has been repeated to provide assurance that the modifications did not affect system performance.
Both systems have been validated using FDA recognized consensus standard ISO 80601-2-56:2017, Particular requirements for basic safety and essential performance of clinical thermometers for body temperature measurement.
Thus, the differences between the systems do not raise new questions for the subject device.
#### 7) Non Clinical Testing & Performance Data
A risk analysis was performed to identify risks associated with the device modifications. Verification and validation testing has been performed to demonstrate that identified risks have been mitigated. This testing demonstrates that the modified ATS Thermal Imaging Probe and the ATS Patient Interface Unit is substantially equivalent to the predicate.
| Device Modification | Associated Risk | Verification / Validation<br>Method | Acceptance<br>Criteria | Results |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ATS Thermal Imaging Probe Modifications | | | | |
| Two connectors combined<br>into one handle. | Electrical connections not<br>adequate -<br>Accuracy thermocouple | Testing in accordance with ISO<br>80601-2-56 second Edition 2017-<br>03: Medical electrical equipment -<br>Part 2-56. | Accuracy $\pm$ 0.3° C<br>across the rated output<br>range. | All samples tested met<br>the accuracy<br>acceptance criteria $\pm$<br>0.3° C . |
| Two connectors combined<br>into one handle. | Electrical connections not<br>adequate -<br>Response time<br>thermocouple | Testing in accordance with ISO<br>80601-2-56 second Edition 2017-<br>03: Medical electrical equipment -<br>Part 2-56. | Response time same as<br>predicate, < 2.5<br>seconds average | Test results met the<br>acceptance criteria <<br>2.5 seconds average. |
| Two connectors combined<br>into one handle. | Optical connections not<br>adequate.<br>Performance compromised<br>- IR Accuracy | IR Temperature Accuracy tests<br>and IR characterization testing<br>over the rated temperature range. | IR Temperature<br>Accuracy equivalent to<br>predicate across rated<br>output range $\pm$ 2°C. | All samples tested met<br>the acceptance criteria<br>$\pm$ 2°C across rated<br>output range. |
| Two connectors combined<br>into one handle. | Mechanical connections not<br>adequate - modified<br>connections break | Tensile test all joints. | All connections and<br>joints must withstand<br>3.37 lbs | All connections and<br>joints exceed 3.37 lbs<br>tensile strength. |
| Distal tip modified to<br>include BaSO4 filler. | Biocompatibility<br>compromised by<br>modification. | Testing based on ISO 10993-<br>1:2009 Biological evaluation of<br>medical devices - Part 1:<br>Evaluation and testing within a<br>risk management process, the<br>following tests are recommended:<br>• Cytotoxicity<br>• Sensitization<br>• Irritation/Intracutaneous<br>Reactivity | Test results must<br>provide assurance of<br>biocompatibility when<br>tested in accordance<br>with ISO 10993-<br>1:2009. | All test results provide<br>assurance of<br>biocompatibility in<br>accordance with ISO<br>10993-1:2009. |
| ATS Patient Interface Unit Modifications – Housing & Circuit Boards | | | | |
| Housing (packaging)<br>modified to new form<br>factor to accommodate | Modifications compromise<br>EMC compatibility | Testing in accordance with<br>IEC 60601-1-2 Edition 4.0: 2014-<br>02 Medical electrical equipment - | Must comply with<br>recognized consensus<br>standard for | Testing performed at<br>certified test facility. |
{8}------------------------------------------------
| Device Modification | Associated Risk | Verification / Validation<br>Method | Acceptance<br>Criteria | Results |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| touch screen and single<br>probe connection. | | Part 1-2: General requirements for<br>basic safety and essential<br>performance - Collateral standard:<br>Electromagnetic disturbances -<br>Requirements and tests (4th<br>Edition). | Electromagnetic<br>compatibility | Compliance confirmed. |
| Housing (packaging)<br>modified to new form<br>factor to accommodate<br>touch screen and single<br>probe connection. | Modifications compromise<br>electrical safety | Testing in accordance with IEC<br>60601-1:2005 + A1:2012(E),<br>Medical electrical equipment -<br>Part 1: General requirements for<br>basic safety and essential<br>performance. | Must comply with<br>recognized consensus<br>standard for electrical<br>safety. | Testing performed at<br>certified test facility.<br>Compliance confirmed. |
| Circuit boards modified to<br>accommodate modified<br>housing, single probe<br>connection and touch<br>screen. | Modifications compromise<br>performance | All accuracy testing repeated (see<br>sections above).<br>Software validation testing covers<br>all system functional requirements<br>(see software below). | The ATS Patient<br>interface unit must<br>meet all performance<br>criteria and must<br>support all software<br>functions. | All accuracy testing<br>meets criteria (see<br>sections above).<br>Software validation<br>testing meets all<br>acceptance criteria (see<br>below) |
| ATS Patient Interface Unit Modifications - Software | | | | |
| Software modified<br>accommodate modified<br>circuit boards, single probe<br>connection and touch<br>screen. | Software performance<br>compromised by<br>modification. | The software has been developed<br>and validated in accordance with<br>medical device standards including<br>ANSI/AAMI/IEC 62304:2006<br>Medical device software -<br>Software life cycle processes.<br>Complete software validation<br>testing performed including 100%<br>functional testing. | Software must perform<br>100% of functional<br>requirements in<br>accordance with the<br>requirements<br>specifications. | Software validation<br>confirms compliance<br>with all requirements<br>specifications. |
## 8) Conclusions
A risk analysis was performed to identify risks associated with the device modifications. Verification and validation testing has been performed to demonstrate that the identified risks have been mitigated. This testing demonstrates that the modified ATS Thermal Imaging Probe and ATS Patient Interface Unit is substantially equivalent to the predicate.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.