Patient urine samples were analyzed to compare the performance of the DRI Benzodiazepine Assay against LC-MS/MS to establish clinical accuracy and concordance.
The DRI Benzodiazepine Assay is a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay intended for the qualitative and/or semi-quantitative determination of the presence of benzodiazepines and their metabolites in human urine at a cutoff concentration of 200 ng/mL. The assay is intended to be used in laboratories and provides a simple and rapid analytical screening procedure to detect benzodiazepines in human urine. The assay is designed for use with a number of clinical chemistry analyzers. This assay is calibrated against Oxazepam. This product is intended to be used by trained professionals only. The semi-quantitative mode is for the purpose of enabling laboratories to determine an appropriate dilution of the specimen for confirmation by a confirmatory method such as Liquid Chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) or permitting laboratories to establish quality control procedures. The assay provides only a preliminary analytical test result. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used to obtain a confirmed analytical result. Gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry (GC/MS) or Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the preferred confirmatory method. Clinical and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly when preliminary results are used. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only.
Device Story
Homogeneous enzyme immunoassay for benzodiazepine screening in human urine; utilizes competition between drug in sample and G6PDH-labeled drug for specific antibody binding sites. Enzyme activity, measured spectrophotometrically at 340 nm, is inversely proportional to drug concentration. Used in clinical laboratories by trained professionals on chemistry analyzers (e.g., Beckman AU680). Provides preliminary results; requires confirmation via GC/MS or LC-MS/MS. Enables semi-quantitative estimation for dilution guidance or QC. Benefits include rapid screening to support clinical decision-making regarding drug presence.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical trials performed. Evidence consists of analytical bench testing including precision (n=80 per condition), linearity (100-1000 ng/mL), cross-reactivity with structurally related/unrelated compounds, and interference testing (endogenous substances, pH, specific gravity). Method comparison study (n=106) against LC-MS/MS showed concordance, with discordant samples attributed to cross-reactivity with specific metabolites (e.g., 7-amino-clonazepam, alpha-hydroxy-alprazolam).
Technological Characteristics
Homogeneous enzyme immunoassay; reagents contain sheep polyclonal anti-benzodiazepine antibodies and G6PDH-labeled benzodiazepine derivative. Tris buffer with sodium azide preservative. Spectrophotometric detection at 340 nm. Calibrated against Oxazepam. Designed for automated clinical chemistry analyzers. Standards referenced: CLSI EP05-A3, EP07-A2, EP09-A3, EP06-A, EP25-A.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the qualitative and/or semi-quantitative detection of benzodiazepines and their metabolites in human urine at a 200 ng/mL cutoff. Intended for use by trained professionals in laboratory settings as a preliminary screening procedure.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A benzodiazepine test system is a device intended to measure any of the benzodiazepine compounds, sedative and hypnotic drugs, in blood, plasma, and urine. The benzodiazepine compounds include chlordiazepoxide, diazepam, oxazepam, chlorzepate, flurazepam, and nitrazepam. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of benzodiazepine use or overdose and in monitoring levels of benzodiazepines to ensure appropriate therapy.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). A benzodiazepine test system is not exempt if it is intended for any use other than employment or insurance testing or is intended for Federal drug testing programs. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9, provided the test system is intended for employment and insurance testing and includes a statement in the labeling that the device is intended solely for use in employment and insurance testing, and does not include devices intended for Federal drug testing programs (*e.g.,* programs run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. military).
Predicate Devices
DRI Benzodiazepine Assay (k930529)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k173963
B. Purpose for Submission:
Modification of a previously cleared device to replace the anti-benzodiazepine polyclonal goat antibodies with polyclonal sheep antibodies.
C. Measurand:
Benzodiazepines
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative and semi-quantitative homogeneous immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Microgenics Corporation
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
DRI Benzodiazepine Assay
G. Regulatory Information:
| Regulation section | Classification | Product Code | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 21CFR 862.3170 | Class II | JXM | Toxicology (91) |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
Refer to Indications for Use below
2. Indication(s) for use:
The DRI Benzodiazepine Assay is a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay intended for the qualitative and/or semi-quantitative determination of the presence of benzodiazepines and their metabolites in human urine at a cutoff concentration of 200 ng/mL. The assay is
{1}
intended to be used in laboratories and provides a simple and rapid analytical screening procedure to detect benzodiazepines in human urine. The assay is designed for use with a number of clinical chemistry analyzers. This assay is calibrated against Oxazepam. This product is intended to be used by trained professionals only.
The semi-quantitative mode is for the purpose of enabling laboratories to determine an appropriate dilution of the specimen for confirmation by a confirmatory method such as Liquid Chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) or permitting laboratories to establish quality control procedures.
The assay provides only a preliminary analytical test result. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used to obtain a confirmed analytical result. Gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry (GC/MS) or Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the preferred confirmatory method.
Clinical and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly when preliminary results are used. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Performance data was obtained using the Beckman AU680 clinical chemistry analyzer.
I. Device Description:
The assay consists of reagents (A and E):
Reagent A: Contains sheep polyclonal anti-benzodiazepine antibodies, glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) in Tris buffer with sodium azide as a preservative.
Reagent E: Contains benzodiazepine derivative labeled with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) in Tris buffer with sodium azide as a preservative.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
DRI Benzodiazepine Assay
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k930529
{2}
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device k173963 | Predicate Device k930529 |
| Intended Use | The qualitative and/or semi-quantitative determination of the presence of benzodiazepines and their metabolites in human urine | Same |
| Measured Analyte | Benzodiazepine and its metabolites | Same |
| Test Matrix | Urine | Same |
| Calibrator | Oxazepam | Same |
| Cutoff Levels | 200 ng/mL | Same |
| Methodology | Homogeneous enzyme immunoassay | Same |
| Storage | 2–8°C until expiration | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device k173963 | Predicate Device k930529 |
| Antibody | Polyclonal sheep antibody | Polyclonal goat antibody |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- CLSI EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Third Edition, 2014.
- CLSI EP07-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry, Approved Guideline – Second Edition, 2005.
- CLSI EP09-A3; Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline – Third Edition, 2013.
- CLSI EP06-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures, a Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline, 2003.
- CLSI EP25-A: Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved Guideline, 2009.
L. Test Principle:
The DRI Benzodiazepine Assay is a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay with liquid ready-to-use reagents. The assay uses a specific antibody which can detect benzodiazepines and their metabolites in urine. The assay is based on the competition of an enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) labeled drug and the drug from the urine sample for a
{3}
fixed amount of specific antibody binding sites. In the absence of free drug from the sample, the enzyme-labeled drug is bound by the specific antibody and the enzyme activity is inhibited. This phenomenon creates a relationship between drug concentration in urine and the enzyme activity. The enzyme G6PDH activity is determined spectrophotometrically at $340~\mathrm{nm}$ by measuring its ability to convert nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) to NADH.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision was evaluated using CLSI Guideline EP05-A3 as a guideline, at one site with one analyzer, two operators, and two lots each of reagents, calibrators and controls. Testing was carried out for 20 days with two runs per day, at least two hours apart and two replicates per run in both Qualitative and Semi-quantitative modes, giving a total of 80 determinants $(n = 80)$ . Drug-free negative urine was spiked with oxazepam to final concentrations of $-100\%$ , $-75\%$ , $-50\%$ , $-25\%$ , below cutoff and $+25\%$ , $+50\%$ , $+75\%$ and $+100\%$ , above cutoff, and the concentrations were confirmed by LC-MS/MS. Results are summarized below:
Qualitative Mode Lot 1:
| % of Cutoff (200 ng/mL) | Target concentration (ng/mL) | Measured Conc. (ng/mL) | # of determinants | # Negative / # Positive |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| -100 | 0 | N/A | 80 | 80/0 |
| -75 | 50 | 56 | 80 | 80/0 |
| -50 | 100 | 102 | 80 | 80/0 |
| -25 | 150 | 161.5 | 80 | 80/0 |
| Cut-off | 200 | 214 | 80 | 16/64 |
| +25 | 250 | 255.5 | 80 | 0/80 |
| +50 | 300 | 299 | 80 | 0/80 |
| +75 | 350 | 348 | 80 | 0/80 |
| +100 | 400 | 403 | 80 | 0/80 |
Qualitative Mode Lot 2:
| % of Cutoff (200 ng/mL) | Target concentration (ng/mL) | Measured Conc. (ng/mL) | # of determinants | # Negative / # Positive |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| -100 | 0 | N/A | 80 | 80/0 |
| -75 | 50 | 56 | 80 | 80/0 |
| -50 | 100 | 102 | 80 | 80/0 |
| -25 | 150 | 161.5 | 80 | 80/0 |
| Cut-off | 200 | 214 | 80 | 70/10 |
{4}
| % of Cutoff (200 ng/mL) | Target concentration (ng/mL) | Measured Conc. (ng/mL) | # of determinants | # Negative / # Positive |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| +25 | 250 | 255.5 | 80 | 0/80 |
| +50 | 300 | 299 | 80 | 0/80 |
| +75 | 350 | 348 | 80 | 0/80 |
| +100 | 400 | 403 | 80 | 0/80 |
Semi-Quantitative Mode Lot 1:
| % of Cutoff (200 ng/mL) | Target concentration (ng/mL) | Measured Conc. (ng/mL) | # of determinants | # Negative / # Positive |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| -100 | 0 | N/A | 80 | 80/0 |
| -75 | 50 | 56 | 80 | 80/0 |
| -50 | 100 | 102 | 80 | 80/0 |
| -25 | 150 | 161.5 | 80 | 80/0 |
| Cut-off | 200 | 214 | 80 | 27/53 |
| +25 | 250 | 255.5 | 80 | 0/80 |
| +50 | 300 | 299 | 80 | 0/80 |
| +75 | 350 | 348 | 80 | 0/80 |
| +100 | 400 | 403 | 80 | 0/80 |
Semi-Quantitative Mode Lot 2:
| % of Cutoff (200 ng/mL) | Target concentration (ng/mL) | Measured Conc. (ng/mL) | # of determinants | # Negative / # Positive |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| -100 | 0 | N/A | 80 | 80/0 |
| -75 | 50 | 56 | 80 | 80/0 |
| -50 | 100 | 102 | 80 | 80/0 |
| -25 | 150 | 161.5 | 80 | 80/0 |
| Cut-off | 200 | 214 | 80 | 79/1 |
| +25 | 250 | 255.5 | 80 | 0/80 |
| +50 | 300 | 299 | 80 | 0/80 |
| +75 | 350 | 348 | 80 | 0/80 |
| +100 | 400 | 403 | 80 | 0/80 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
A recovery study was performed using CLSI EP06-A guidelines. Samples were prepared by spiking a drug free urine pool with a high concentration of oxazepam and generating serial dilutions to achieve concentrations ranging from 100 ng/mL to 1000 ng/mL and were analyzed in replicates of 5 in semi-quantitative mode on one Beckman AU680 analyzer. The results are shown below.
{5}
| Target concentration (ng/mL) | Observed concentration (ng/mL) | % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 0 | -1.0 | N/A |
| 100 | 104.5 | 104.5 |
| 200 | 196.2 | 98.1 |
| 300 | 314.7 | 104.9 |
| 400 | 455.3 | 113.8 |
| 500 | 565.2 | 113.0 |
| 600 | 661.0 | 110.2 |
| 700 | 764.7 | 109.2 |
| 800 | 872.1 | 109.0 |
| 900 | 937.3 | 104.1 |
| 1000 | 1024.9 | 102.5 |
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability: The primary calibrators are traceable to the oxazepam drug purchased from a commercial source which is established at 98% purity. The concentration of the primary calibrator stocks is confirmed by LC-MS/MS from three independent laboratories.
d. Detection limit:
Not applicable.
e. Analytical specificity:
Cross-Reactivity Of Benzodiazepine Compounds and Metabolites
The cross reactivity of benzodiazepine compounds and their metabolites was evaluated by adding known amounts of each compound to drug-free negative urine. The specificity (cross-reactivity) study was performed using one lot of reagents, calibrators and controls in both qualitative and semi-quantitative modes. Percent cross-reactivity was calculated as (Cut-off concentration / Lowest concentration of cross reactant that gives a positive result) x 100. Results are summarized below:
| Structurally related and unrelated compounds | Lowest concentration producing a positive result (ng/mL) | Cross-reactivity (%) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| α-Hydroxyalprazolam | 110 | 182 |
| α-Hydroxytriazolam | 140 | 143 |
| Alprazolam | 110 | 182 |
| 7-Aminoclonazepam | 2,500 | 8 |
| 7-Aminoflunitrazepam | 300 | 67 |
{6}
| Structurally related and unrelated compounds | Lowest concentration producing a positive result (ng/mL) | Cross-reactivity (%) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7-Aminonitrazepam | 300 | 67 |
| Bromazepam | 170 | 118 |
| Chlordiazepoxide | 700 | 29 |
| Clobazam | 150 | 133 |
| Clonazepam | 210 | 95 |
| Clorazepate | 135 | 148 |
| Delorazepam | 150 | 133 |
| Demoxepam | 220 | 91 |
| Desalkylflurazepam | 130 | 154 |
| Diazepam | 110 | 182 |
| Estazolam | 100 | 200 |
| Flunitrazepam | 120 | 167 |
| Flurazepam | 150 | 133 |
| 2-Hydroxyethylflurazepam | 120 | 167 |
| Lorazepam | 700 | 29 |
| Lorazepam glucuronide | 50,000 | <0.4 |
| Lormetazepam | 275 | 73 |
| Medazepam | 325 | 62 |
| Midazolam | 180 | 111 |
| Nitrazepam | 130 | 154 |
| Norchlordiazepoxide | 800 | 25 |
| Nordiazepam | 110 | 182 |
| Oxaprozin | 125,000 | 0.16 |
| Oxazepam | 200 | 100 |
| Oxazepam glucuronide | 50,000 | 0.4 |
| Prazepam | 200 | 100 |
| Temazepam | 160 | 125 |
| Temazepam glucuronide | 50,000 | <0.4 |
| Triazolam | 130 | 154 |
## Interference Testing of Structurally Unrelated Compounds
Interference from structurally unrelated compounds was evaluated by spiking these compounds into urine samples containing near cutoff negative (150 ng/mL) and near cutoff positive (250 ng/mL) concentrations of oxazepam. The compounds listed in the table below did not cause any positive or negative interference at the concentrations shown:
{7}
| Structurally Unrelated Compounds | Tested Concentration (ng/mL) |
| --- | --- |
| 6-Acetyl morphine | 100,000 |
| 10,11 Dihydrocarbamazepine | 100,000 |
| 11-nor-Δ^{9}-THC-COOH | 100,000 |
| Acetaminophen | 1,000,000 |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 1,000,000 |
| Amitriptyline | 100,000 |
| Amoxicillin | 100,000 |
| Amphetamine | 100,000 |
| Amisulpride | 100,000 |
| Benzotropine Mesylate | 100,000 |
| Benzoylecgonine | 100,000 |
| Brompheniramine | 100,000 |
| Buprenorphine | 100,000 |
| Caffeine | 100,000 |
| Captopril | 100,000 |
| Chlorpromazine | 100,000 |
| Chloroquine | 100,000 |
| Cimetidine | 100,000 |
| Clomipramine | 100,000 |
| Codeine | 100,000 |
| Desipramine | 100,000 |
| Dextromethorphan | 100,000 |
| Digoxin | 100,000 |
| Dihydrocodeine | 100,000 |
| Diphenhydramine | 500,000 |
| Doxepine HCl | 100,000 |
| EDDP | 100,000 |
| EMDP | 25,000 |
| Enalapril | 100,000 |
| Fentanyl | 100,000 |
| Fluoxetine | 500,000 |
| Fluophenazine | 100,000 |
| Haloperidol | 100,000 |
| Heroin | 100,000 |
| Hydrocodone | 100,000 |
| Hydromorphone | 100,000 |
| Hydroxychloroquine | 100,000 |
| Hydroxyzine | 100,000 |
| Ibuprofen | 100,000 |
| Imipramine | 100,000 |
8
{8}
| Structurally Unrelated Compounds | Tested Concentration (ng/mL) |
| --- | --- |
| LAAM | 100,000 |
| Levorphanol | 100,000 |
| Levothyroxine | 100,000 |
| Maprotiline | 100,000 |
| Meperidine | 100,000 |
| Methadone | 100,000 |
| Methamphentamine | 100,000 |
| Morphine | 100,000 |
| Morphine-3β-D-glucuronide | 100,000 |
| Morphine-6β-D-glucuronide | 100,000 |
| Nalbuphine | 100,000 |
| Nalorphine | 100,000 |
| Naloxone | 100,000 |
| Naltrexone | 100,000 |
| Naproxen | 100,000 |
| Nifedipine | 100,000 |
| Norcodeine | 100,000 |
| Norhydrocodone | 100,000 |
| Norfluoxetine | 500,000 |
| Noroxycodone | 100,000 |
| Noroxymorphone | 100,000 |
| Norpropoxyphene | 100,000 |
| Norsertraline | 62,500 |
| Nortryptiline | 100,000 |
| Oxycodone | 100,000 |
| Oxymorphone | 100,000 |
| Paroxetine | 100,000 |
| Perphenazine | 100,000 |
| Phencyclidine | 100,000 |
| Phenobarbital | 100,000 |
| Procyclidine | 100,000 |
| Propoxyphene | 100,000 |
| Protriptyline | 100,000 |
| Ranitidine | 100,000 |
| Secobarbital | 100,000 |
| Sertraline | 62,500 |
| Sulpiride | 100,000 |
| Tapentadol | 100,000 |
| Thioridazine | 100,000 |
| Tramadol | 100,000 |
| Triprolidine | 100,000 |
9
{9}
10
| Structurally Unrelated Compounds | Tested Concentration (ng/mL) |
| --- | --- |
| Verapamil | 100,000 |
| Zaleplon | 100,000 |
| Zolpidem | 100,000 |
| Zopiclone | 100,000 |
## Interference Testing of Endogenous Compounds
Potential interference from endogenous compounds was evaluated by spiking these compounds into urine samples containing near cutoff negative (150 ng/mL) and near cutoff positive (250 ng/mL) concentrations of oxazepam. The compounds or conditions listed in the table below did not cause any positive or negative interference, either in the qualitative or semi-quantitative modes, at the concentrations shown in the table below:
| Compounds | Tested Conc. (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| Acetone | 500 |
| Ascorbic Acid | 150 |
| Creatinine | 400 |
| Ethanol | 1000 |
| Galactose | 5 |
| Glucose | 1,000 |
| Hemoglobin | 150 |
| Human Serum Albumin (HSA) | 200 |
| Oxalic acid | 50 |
| Riboflavin | 3 |
| Sodium Chloride | 1,000 |
| Urea | 1,000 |
## Interference Testing of Specific Gravity and pH:
Interference from specific gravity and pH was evaluated by adjusting the specific gravity and pH of samples with near cutoff negative (150 ng/mL) and near cutoff positive (250 ng/mL) concentrations of oxazepam. The following specific gravity or pH levels did not cause any positive or negative interference:
Specific gravity of 1.004, 1.005, 1.007, 1.010, 1.011, 1.013, 1.019, 1.023, 1.025, 1.029.
pH of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11.
{10}
f. Assay cut-off:
Characterization of how the device performs analytically around the claimed cutoff concentration is described in the precision section, M.1.a. above.
2. Comparison studies:
A method comparison study was performed in accordance with CLSI Guideline EP09-A3. One hundred and six patient urine samples were analyzed by the DRI Benzodiazepine Assay in both qualitative and semi-quantitative modes and the results were compared to LC-MS/MS. The results were the same for the qualitative and semi-quantitative modes and are summarized below.
Candidate Device Results vs. LC/MS-MS Values
| Candidate Device Results | Negative by LC-MS/MS | < 50% of Cutoff concentration by LC-MS/MS (< 100ng/mL) | Near Cutoff Negative (Between 50% below the cutoff and the cutoff concentration as determined by LC-MS/MS) (100 - 199 ng/mL) | Near Cutoff Positive (Between the cutoff and 50% above the cutoff concentration as determined by LC-MS/MS) (200 - 300 ng/mL) | High Positives (Greater than 50% above cutoff concentration (>300 ng/mL) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Positive | 0 | 1* | 3* | 5 | 45 |
| Negative | 48 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
*Discordant samples
| Sample ID | Qualitative | Semi-Quantitative | LC-MS/MS | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Negative/Positive | Negative/Positive | Oxazepam (ng/mL) | 7-Amino-clonazepam (ng/mL) | α-Hydroxy-alprazolam (ng/mL) |
| CA160606-045 | Positive | Positive | 86.20 | 3154.6 | NA |
| CA160926-057 | Positive | Positive | 175.08 | 410.7 | 13.5 |
| CA170605-001 | Positive | Positive | 151.52 | 560.4 | 1.43 |
| CA160908-003 | Positive | Positive | 192.87 | NA | 96.3 |
{11}
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable. Urine is the only claimed matrix for the candidate device.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Not applicable.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Parts 801 and 809, as applicable.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
12
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.