K173723 · Encore Medical L.P. · JWH · Mar 5, 2018 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K173723
Device Name
EMPOWR Universal Tibial Baseplate
Applicant
Encore Medical L.P.
Product Code
JWH · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Mar 5, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3560
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Joint replacement is indicated for patients suffering from disability due to: - degenerative, post-traumatic or rheumatoid arthritis; - avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle; - post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy. - moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities; - treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques. This device may also be indicated in the salvage of previously failed surgical attempts. All devices are intended for cemented applications except for the 3DKNEE™ Porous Coated Femur, EMPOWR 3DKNEE™ POROUS Femur, and EMPOWR POROUS Tibia which are intended for cementless applications.
Device Story
EMPOWR Universal Tibial Baseplate is a knee system extension providing modular tibial baseplate implants, stem extensions, and augments. Device used by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings for total knee arthroplasty. System features modular stem plugs, threaded distal connections for augments, and female tapers for posterior stabilized tibial inserts. Augments are stackable and reversible for medial/lateral compartment use, featuring pockets/slots for cement flow. Device replaces damaged joint surfaces to restore function and reduce pain. Surgeon selects components based on patient anatomy and surgical requirements; implants are typically cemented.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data performed. Substantial equivalence supported by non-clinical bench testing, including baseplate/stem extension fatigue testing, finite element analysis (FEA) of baseplate strength, augment screw characterization, locking mechanism disassembly testing, and bacterial endotoxin assessment.
Technological Characteristics
Knee joint patellofemorotibial semi-constrained cemented prosthesis. Modular design includes tibial baseplate, stem extensions, and stackable/reversible augments. Features include female taper for insert locking, threaded distal connections, and cement grooves. Materials and locking geometry are consistent with predicate EMPOWR Knee platform. Non-clinical testing confirms structural integrity via FEA and fatigue testing.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with disability from degenerative, post-traumatic, or rheumatoid arthritis; avascular necrosis of femoral condyle; post-traumatic loss of joint configuration (patellofemoral erosion/dysfunction/prior patellectomy); moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities; or fractures unmanageable by other techniques. Also indicated for salvage of failed surgical attempts.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a tibial component or components and a retropatellar resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA acronym and name on the right. The Department of Health & Human Services logo is a stylized depiction of a human figure, while the FDA acronym and name are written in blue, with the acronym in a square and the name in a sans-serif font.
Encore Medical, L.P. Teffany Hutto Manager, Regulatory Affairs 9800 Metric Blvd Austin, Texas 78758
March 5, 2018
Re: K173723
Trade/Device Name: EMPOWR Universal Tibial Baseplate Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3560 Regulation Name: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial Polymer Semi-Constrained Cemented Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JWH Dated: December 1, 2017 Received: December 5, 2017
Dear Teffany Hutto:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820);
{1}------------------------------------------------
### Page 2 - Teffany Hutto
and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Mark N. Melkerson -S
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
## Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 06/30/2020 See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known) K173723
Device Name EMPOWR Universal Tibial Baseplate
Indications for Use (Describe)
Joint replacement is indicated for patients suffering from disability due to:
- degenerative, post-traumatic or rheumatoid arthritis;
- avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle;
- post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy.
- moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities;
- treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.
This device may also be indicated in the salvage of previously failed surgical attempts. All devices are intended for cemented applications except for the 3DKNEE™ Porous Coated Femur, EMPOWR 3DKNEE™ POROUS Femur, and EMPOWR POROUS Tibia which are intended for cementless applications.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
Date: March 5, 2018
Manufacturer: DJO Surgical (legally Encore Medical, L.P.) 9800 Metric Blvd Austin, TX 78758
Contact Person: Teffany Hutto Manager, Regulatory Affairs Phone: (512) 834-6255 Fax: (760) 597-3466 Email: teffany.hutto@djoglobal.com
| Product | Classification | Product Code | Product Code | Regulation and Classification Name |
|-----------------------------------|----------------|--------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| EMPOWR Universal Tibial Baseplate | Class II | JWH | JWH | Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis<br>per 888.3560 |
### Description:
The EMPOWR Universal Tibial Baseplate Implant is a line extension to the EMPOWR Knee platform to include a tibial baseplate implant with accessories (stem extensions and augments) and instruments, which provide surgeons with comprehensive surgical solutions to address a variety of patient demographics and surgeon preferences.
### Indications for Use:
Joint replacement is indicated for patients suffering from disability due to:
- degenerative, post-traumatic or rheumatoid arthritis; .
- . avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle;
- post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, ● dysfunction or prior patellectomy;
- moderate valgus, varus or flexion deformities;
- treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques. .
This device may also be indicated in the salvage of previously failed surgical attempts. All devices are intended for cemented applications except for the 3DKNEE™ Porous Coated Femur, EMPOWR 3DKNEE™ POROUS Femur, and EMPOWR POROUS Tibia which are intended for cementless applications.
### Predicate Devices:
- DJO Surgical EMPOWR Knee System K143242 ●
- DJO Surgical Foundation Modular Tibial Baseplate K932425 ●
- DJO Surgical Movation Knee K100900 ●
### Comparable Features and Differences to Predicate Device(s):
| Features Exactly the<br>Same as Predicate to<br>Subject Device | |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | • Size offerings |
| | • Material |
| | • Locking Mechanism geometry and surface finish of the Tibial Baseplate |
| | • Distal keel profile and surface finish |
| | • Intended Use |
{4}------------------------------------------------
| Features Similar as<br>Predicate to Subject<br>Device | Stem length is the same once a modular stem plug is threaded onto the distal end of the tibial base Cement grooves on the side of the stem extension Threaded bolt assembly to distal side of tibial base implant |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Features Different from<br>Predicate to Subject<br>Device | Stem boss height is common 25mm for all tibia sizes Size specific modular stem plug that restores the height of the tibial<br>baseplate; stem plug may be removed intra-operatively to facilitate<br>assembly with a stem extension accessory or may be left as assembled and<br>implanted threaded holes added to the distal (bone interface) side to use as an<br>attachment means for a bolt to assemble augment accessories Female taper in the proximal (mating tibial insert locking mechanism) to<br>facilitate assembly with a thicker and more constrained posterior stabilized<br>tibial insert Threaded connection to distal side of tibial baseplate Augment accessories are stackable up to 15mm and flip-able so they may<br>be used in either medial or lateral compartment Augment accessories have pockets and through slots to help facilitate<br>cement flow between augments as added fixation to the tibial baseplate<br>implant |
Non-Clinical Testing: Testing has been performed for baseplate/stem extension fatigue testing, baseplate strength FEA, augment screw characterization, and locking mechanism disassembly. This testing has determined that the subject device is similar to the evaluated predicate device.
Endotoxin Assessment: Bacterial endotoxin testing was conducted and was found to meet the expected endotoxin limits.
Clinical Testing: Clinical testing was not required / performed.
Conclusions: All testing and evaluations demonstrate that the device is substantially equivalent to the predicates identified.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.