K173476 · Stryker · MAX · Jan 18, 2018 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K173476
Device Name
Tritanium® TL Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage
Applicant
Stryker
Product Code
MAX · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jan 18, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3080
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Stryker Spine Tritanium® TL cage is an intervertebral body fusion device indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy. Additionally, the Tritanium TL Cage can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis. The Tritanium TL Cage is to be implanted via a posterior approach. The Tritanium TL Cage is intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine.
Device Story
Curved intervertebral body fusion cage; implanted via posterior approach; used as adjunct to fusion in lumbar spine. Device features solid and porous structures created via Laser Rapid Manufacturing (LRM) using proprietary Tritanium In-Growth Technology. Serrated superior/inferior surfaces provide multidirectional fixation and maximize endplate contact; tapered leading edge facilitates insertion; central column allows for graft containment. Used by surgeons in clinical settings; requires supplemental spinal fixation systems. Provides structural support to intervertebral space to facilitate fusion; benefits patients by stabilizing spinal segments affected by degenerative disc disease or scoliosis.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data provided. Mechanical testing performed per ASTM F2077-14 (compression, shear, torsion), ASTM F04-25-02-02 (expulsion), and ASTM F2267-04 (subsidence). Material characterization and porous surface testing performed per ASTM F1472-08, F1147-05, F1044-05, F1160-05, E8/E8M, and F2129-15. Bacterial endotoxin testing performed per ANSI/AAMI ST72:2011.
Technological Characteristics
Constructed from Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy (ASTM F1472-08). Manufactured via Laser Rapid Manufacturing (LRM). Features porous and solid structures. Provided sterile. Dimensions include various lengths, heights, and lordotic angles. Designed for use with supplemental fixation.
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels (L2-S1) or degenerative scoliosis. DDD defined as discogenic back pain with radiographic confirmation; may include up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. Requires six months of failed nonoperative therapy. Used with autograft/allogenic bone graft and supplemental spinal fixation.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
*Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required.* Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
{0}------------------------------------------------
January 18, 2018
Stryker Mr. Nikin Desai Regulatory Affairs Specialist 2 Pearl Court Allendale, New Jersey 07401
Re: K173476
Trade/Device Name: Tritanium® TL Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888,3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MAX Dated: November 8, 2017 Received: November 9, 2017
Dear Mr. Desai:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
### Katherine D. Kavlock -S
for Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K173476
Device Name
Tritanium® TL Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Stryker Spine Tritanium® TL cage is an intervertebral body fusion device indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1.
DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy.
Additionally, the Tritanium TL Cage can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.
The Tritanium TL Cage is to be implanted via a posterior approach.
The Tritanium TL Cage is intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-family: Arial;">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) |
| ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# stryker
| 510(k) Summary: Tritanium® TL Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage | |
|------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Manufacturer/Submitter: | Stryker Spine<br>2 Pearl Ct.<br>Allendale, NJ 07401 |
| Contact Person : | Name: Nikin Desai<br>Phone: (201) 749-8176<br>Fax: (201) 831-3000<br>Email:Nikin.Desai@stryker.com |
| Date Prepared: | 11/08/2017 |
| Trade Name: | Tritanium® TL Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage |
| Common Name: | Intervertebral body fusion device |
| Proposed Class: | Class II |
| Classification Name: | Intervertebral Body Fusion Device with Bone Graft, Lumbar (21 CFR<br>§888.3080) |
| Product Code: | MAX |
| Predicate Devices: | Primary Predicates:<br>AVS® PL and TL PEEK Spacers (K151726)<br>Additional Predicates:<br>Tritanium® PL Posterior Lumbar Cage (K162262)<br>Tritanium® C Anterior Cervical Cage (K171496) |
| Device Description: | The purpose of this submission is to introduce a curved posterior lumbar<br>cage intended for use as an aid in lumbar spinal fixation.<br><br>The Tritanium TL Intervertebral Body Fusion Cage is intended for use as an<br>aid in lumbar spinal fixation. The cage is a curved implant that consists of a<br>unique configuration of both solid and porous structures that are<br>simultaneously built using Laser Rapid Manufacturing (LRM) method<br>applying Stryker's proprietary Tritanium® In-Growth Technology. The cage<br>is offered in a variety of lengths, heights and lordotic angles to adapt to a<br>variety of patient anatomies. It has serrations on the superior and inferior<br>surfaces designed for multidirectional fixation and to maximize surface area<br>for endplate contact with the implant. The implants have a smooth, tapered<br>leading edge to facilitate cage insertion into the intervertebral space. The<br>implants have a central column spanning endplate to endplate for graft<br>containment and to aid in fusion throughout the interbody cage.<br><br>The implant is designed to be used with supplemental fixation cleared for use<br>in the lumbosacral spine.<br><br>The Tritanium TL cages are constructed from Titanium alloy: Ti-6Al-4V<br>(ASTM F1472-08) and are provided sterile. |
| 510(k) Summary: Tritanium® TL Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage | |
| Indications for Use: | The Stryker Spine Tritanium® TL cage is an intervertebral body fusion device<br>indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of<br>cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when used as an adjunct to<br>fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two<br>contiguous levels from L2 to S1.<br><br>DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc<br>confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also<br>have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients<br>should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy.<br><br>Additionally, the Tritanium TL Cage can be used as an adjunct to fusion in<br>patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.<br><br>The Tritanium TL Cage is to be implanted via a posterior approach.<br><br>The Tritanium TL Cage is intended to be used with supplemental spinal<br>fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine. |
| Summary of the<br>Technological<br>Characteristics | The Subject Tritanium TL Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage and the cleared<br>Tritanium PL and C cages share similar material/material technology and<br>the following design features:<br>Graft windows for packing autogenous or allogenic bone Comparable heights, widths, lengths and lordotic angles Serrations on the superior and inferior surfaces Supplemental fixation |
| Summary of the<br>Performance Data | Testing in compliance with:<br><br>FDA's June 12, 2007 "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document:<br>Intervertebral Body Fusion Device" was performed for the subject Tritanium<br>TL Cages and demonstrated substantially equivalent performance to the<br>identified predicate devices. The following mechanical tests were performed:<br>Static and Dynamic Compression (per ASTM F2077-14) Static and Dynamic Compression Shear (per ASTM F2077-14) Static and Dynamic Torsion (per ASTM F2077-14) Expulsion (per ASTM F04-25-02-02 Draft) Subsidence (per ASTM F2267-04(2011)) Wear Debris Assessment, and Impaction<br>Characterization of the Physical, Chemistry and Mechanical properties of the<br>subject Tritanium TL Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage was established through |
| 510(k) Summary: Tritanium® TL Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage | |
| | Tritanium C Anterior Cervical Cage material testing which demonstrated that<br>the porous surface design of the cage met at minimum the requirements<br>outlined in the:<br>FDA guidance documents: "Guidance Document for testing orthopedic<br>implants with modified metallic surfaces apposing bone or bone<br>cement [April 28, 1994]", "Class II Special Controls Guidance<br>Document: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial and Femorotibial<br>Metal/Polymer Porous-Coated Uncemented Prostheses [January 16,<br>2003]", and draft guidance for "Technical considerations for Additive<br>Manufactured Devices [May 10, 2016]" ASTM 1472-08: Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-<br>6Aluminum-4Vanadium Alloy (UNS R56400) for Surgical Implant<br>Applications ASTM F1147-05: Standard Test Method for Tension Testing of<br>Calcium Phosphate and Metallic Coatings ASTM F1044-05: Standard Test Method for Shear Testing of Calcium<br>Phosphate and Metallic Coatings ASTM F1160-05: Standard Test Method for Shear and Bending<br>Fatigue Testing of Calcium Phosphate and Metallic Medical and<br>Composite Calcium Phosphate/Metallic Coating ASTM E8/E8M: Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic<br>Materials Electromechanical performance evaluation of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-<br>4V alloy was also performed per ASTM F2129-15: Standard test method for<br>conducting cyclic potentiodynamic polarization measurements to determine<br>the corrosion susceptibility of small implant devices.<br>Bacterial endotoxin testing (BET) as specified in ANSI/AAMI<br>ST72:2011 is used for pyrogenicity testing to achieve the<br>Endotoxin limit of < 20EU/Device. |
| Conclusion | Based on the design features, the use of established well known materials,<br>feature comparisons, indications for use, and results of the mechanical<br>testing, the Tritanium TL Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage has demonstrated<br>substantial equivalence to the identified predicate devices |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the word "stryker" in a bold, sans-serif font. The letters are black, and there is a thin black line underneath the word. The background is white.
{5}------------------------------------------------
## stryker
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.