The Xpert® Xpress Strep A test, performed on the GeneXpert Xpress System, is a rapid, qualitative in vitro diagnostic test for the detection of Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus, Strep A) in throat swab specimens from patients with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis. The Xpert Xpress Strep A test can be used as an aid in the diagnosis of Group A Streptococcal pharyngitis. The assay is not intended to monitor treatment for Group A Streptococcus infections. The Xpert Xpress Strep A test utilizes an automated real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect Streptococcus pyogenes DNA.
Device Story
Automated in vitro diagnostic test for qualitative detection of Streptococcus pyogenes DNA in throat swab specimens; performed on GeneXpert Xpress System. Uses single-use, multi-chambered fluidic cartridges containing PCR reagents; system automates sample preparation, cell lysis via ultrasonic horn, and real-time PCR amplification/detection using proprietary I-CORE thermocycler. Provides results in ~24 minutes or less. Used in clinical settings by healthcare personnel. System generates automated reports for clinician review to aid in pharyngitis diagnosis. Benefits include rapid, accurate identification of Group A Strep, facilitating timely clinical decision-making.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective, multi-center study (n=623) comparing Xpert Xpress Strep A to culture/latex agglutination. Sensitivity 99.4% (95% CI: 96.5-99.9%), specificity 94.1% (95% CI: 91.6-95.9%), PPV 85.3%, NPV 99.8%. Reproducibility study across 3 sites/operators showed high agreement (91-100% depending on concentration). Analytical studies confirmed 100% specificity against 70 cross-reactive organisms and no interference from common commensal microflora or substances.
Technological Characteristics
Real-time PCR assay; automated nucleic acid extraction/amplification. Single-use fluidic cartridges with internal Sample Processing Control (SPC) and Probe Check Control (PCC). Employs ultrasonic lysis and I-CORE thermocycler. Compatible with GeneXpert Dx, Infinity-48s, Infinity-80, and Xpress systems. Qualitative output.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis to detect Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A B-hemolytic Strep A) in throat swab specimens. Used as an aid in diagnosis. Not for monitoring treatment.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A Streptococcus spp. nucleic acid-based assay is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic device intended to simultaneously detect and identify various Streptococcus spp. nucleic acids extracted directly from clinical specimens. The device detects specific nucleic acid sequences for organism identification. The identification aids in the diagnosis of diseases caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Streptococcus and provides epidemiological information on these diseases. Pathogenic streptococci are associated with infections, such as sore throat, impetigo (an infection characterized by small pustules on the skin), urinary tract infections, rheumatic fever, and kidney disease.
Special Controls
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: 1) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed device description documentation, including the device components, ancillary reagents required but not provided, and a detailed explanation of the methodology including primer/probe sequence, design, and rationale for sequence selection. 2) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed documentation from the following analytical and clinical performance studies: Analytical sensitivity (Limit of Detection), reactivity, inclusivity, precision, reproducibility, interference, cross reactivity, carry-over, and cross contamination. 3) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed documentation from a clinical study. The study, performed on a study population consistent with the intended use population, must compare the device performance to results obtained from well-accepted reference methods. 4) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed documentation for device software, including, but not limited to, software applications and hardwarebased devices that incorporate software. 5) Premarket notification submissions must include database implementation methodology, construction parameters and quality assurance protocols, as appropriate. 6) The device labeling must include limitations regarding the need for culture confirmation of negative specimens, as appropriate. 7) A detailed explanation of the interpretation of results and acceptance criteria must be included in the device's 21 CFR 809.10(b)(9) compliant labeling. 8) Premarket notification submissions must include details on an end user device training program that will be offered while marketing the device, as appropriate.
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed device description documentation, including the device components, ancillary reagents required but not provided, and a detailed explanation of the methodology including primer/probe sequence, design, and rationale for sequence selection.
(2) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed documentation from the following analytical and clinical performance studies: Analytical sensitivity (Limit of Detection), reactivity, inclusivity, precision, reproducibility, interference, cross reactivity, carry-over, and cross contamination.
(3) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed documentation from a clinical study. The study, performed on a study population consistent with the intended use population, must compare the device performance to results obtained from well-accepted reference methods.
(4) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed documentation for device software, including, but not limited to, software applications and hardware-based devices that incorporate software.
(5) Premarket notification submissions must include database implementation methodology, construction parameters, and quality assurance protocols, as appropriate.
(6) The device labeling must include limitations regarding the need for culture confirmation of negative specimens, as appropriate.
(7) A detailed explanation of the interpretation of results and acceptance criteria must be included in the device's 21 CFR 809.10(b)(9) compliant labeling.
(8) Premarket notification submissions must include details on an end user device training program that will be offered while marketing the device, as appropriate.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
K173398
B. Purpose for Submission:
To obtain a Substantial Equivalence determination for the Xpert Xpress Strep A test performed on the GeneXpert Xpress System.
C. Measurand:
Conserved DNA sequence of the *Streptococcus pyogenes* bacterial genome
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
E. Applicant:
Cepheid
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Xpert Xpress Strep A
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 866.2680: *Streptococcus* spp. nucleic acid-based assay
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code(s):
PGX: Groups A, C and G β-Hemolytic *Streptococcus* Nucleic Acid Amplification System
OOI: Instrumentation for clinical multiplex test systems
{1}
4. Panel:
Microbiology (83)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The Xpert Xpress Strep A test, performed on the GeneXpert Xpress Systems, is a rapid, qualitative *in vitro* diagnostic test for the detection of *Streptococcus pyogenes* (Group A β-hemolytic *Streptococcus*, Strep A) in throat swab specimens from patients with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis. The Xpert Xpress Strep A test can be used as an aid in the diagnosis of patients with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis. The Xpert Xpress Strep A test can be used as an aid in the diagnosis of Group A Streptococcal pharyngitis. The assay is not intended to monitor treatment for Group A Streptococcus infections.
The Xpert Xpress Strep A test utilizes an automated real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect *Streptococcus pyogenes* DNA.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as Intended Use
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
The following Limitations have been added to the labeling:
a. Additional follow-up testing by culture is required if the Xpert Xpress Strep A test result is negative and clinical symptoms persist, or in the event of an outbreak of acute rheumatic fever (ARF).
b. The performance of the Xpert Xpress Strep A test was evaluated using the procedures provided in this package insert only. Modifications to these procedures may alter the performance of the test.
c. The Xpert Xpress Strep A test has been validated only with Copan Liquid Amies Elution Swab (ESwab) Collection Kit (Copan 480C or Copan 480CE).
4. Special instrument requirements:
GeneXpert Xpress System (The GeneXpert Xpress II and GeneXpert Xpress IV instruments)
I. Device Description:
The Cepheid Xpert Xpress Strep A test is an automated real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) *in vitro* diagnostic test for qualitative detection of *Streptococcus pyogenes* DNA directly from throat swab specimens from patients with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis.
{2}
Throat swab specimen are collected using the Copan Liquid Amies Elution Swab (ESwab) collection medium. The sample is mixed by shaking and 300ul of is added to the Xpert Xpress Strep A cartridge using a disposable transfer pipette. Once the cartridge is loaded into a GeneXpert Xpress module and the test is initiated by the operator, all the steps associated with sample processing, PCR amplification/detection and result interpretation occur automatically.
The Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay is performed on the Cepheid GeneXpert Xpress System that automates sample preparation, DNA amplification and real-time detection in single-use, disposable cartridges.
The Xpert Xpress Strep A test cartridge contains a pair of PCR primers and a hydrolysis probe that enable detection of a conserved DNA sequence within the S. pyogenes genome. The assay also incorporates a Sample Processing Control (SPC) and a Probe Check Control (PCC) to monitor the integrity of the reagents and process workflow.
The GeneXpert Xpress System, which uses the GeneXpert Xpress II and IV instruments, performs separate sample preparation and real-time PCR and RT-PCR tests. Each module contains a syringe pump drive for dispensing fluids, an ultrasonic horn for lysing cells, a valve drive that rotates the cartridge valve body to address the different cartridge chambers for sample movement, and a thermocycler unit for performing real-time PCR and RT-PCR and detection.
The Xpert Xpress Strep A results are interpreted by the GeneXpert Xpress software from measured fluorescent signals and are shown in the "Test Result" screen. The final result report can be viewed on-screen and/or printed.
The single-use, multi-chambered fluidic cartridges are designed to complete sample preparation and real-time PCR for the detection of genomic DNA S. pyogenes in approximately 24 minutes or less.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Liat Strep A Assay
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K141338
{3}
# 3. Comparison with predicate:
Table 1. Comparison of the Xpert Xpress Strep A with the Predicate Device
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device (K173398) | Predicate (K141338) |
| | Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay | Liat Strep A Assay |
| Regulation | 21 CFR 866.2680 | Same |
| Product Code | PGX | Same |
| Device Class | Class II | Same |
| Intended Use | The Xpert Xpress Strep A test, performed on the GeneXpert Xpress Systems, is a rapid, qualitative in vitro diagnostic test for the detection of Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus, Strep A) in throat swab specimens from patients with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis. The Xpert Xpress Strep A test can be used as an aid in the diagnosis of Group A Streptococcal pharyngitis. The assay is not intended to monitor treatment for Group A Streptococcus infections. The Xpert Xpress Strep A test utilizes an automated real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect Streptococcus pyogenes DNA. | The Liat Strep A Assay, performed on the Liat Analyzer, is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test for the detection of Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus, Strep A) in throat swab specimens from patients with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis. The Liat Strep A Assay utilizes nucleic acid purification and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology to detect Streptococcus pyogenes by targeting a segment of the Streptococcus pyogenes genome. |
| Analyte | Group A Streptococcus | Same |
| Measurand | Conserved region of S. pyogenes DNA | Same |
| Specimen Type | Throat swab in liquid Amies medium | Same |
| Reagent Format | Unitized ready for use | Same |
| Assay Format | Automated DNA extraction, amplification and detection | Same |
| Process Control | Cell-based | Same |
| External Controls | Available | Same |
| Detection Technique | Different reporter dyes for target and Internal Control | Same |
| Assay Result | Qualitative | Same |
{4}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device (K173398) | Predicate (K141338) |
| Xpert Xpress
Strep A | | Liat Strep A Assay |
| Instrument System | GeneXpert Xpress, GeneXpert Dx, GeneXpert Infinity-48s or GeneXpert Infinity-80 instrument systems | Liat Analyzer |
| Bacterial Lysis | Mechanical (sonication) | Chaotrope and enzymatic digestion |
| Time-to-result | ~24 minutes without early assay termination;
~18 minutes with early assay termination for positive samples | ~15 minutes |
| Early Assay termination function | Yes (for positive samples) | No |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
1. Guidance for Industry, FDA Reviewers and Compliance on: Off-the-Shelf Software Use in Medical Devices; September 9, 1999.
2. General Principles of Software Validation; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff; January 11, 2002.
3. Guidance for Industry: Cybersecurity for Networked Medical Devices Containing Off-the-Shelf (OTS) Software; January 14, 2005.
4. Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Class II Special Controls Guidance Document - Instrumentation for Clinical Multiplex Test Systems; March 10, 2005.
5. Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Guidance for the Content of Pre-market Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices; May 11, 2005.
6. Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Format for Traditional and Abbreviated 510(k)s; August 12, 2005.
7. Guidance for Sponsors, Institutional Review Boards, Clinical Investigators and FDA Staff: Informed Consent for In Vitro Diagnostic Device Studies Using Leftover Human Specimens that are Not Individually Identifiable; April 25, 2006.
8. Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Content of Premarket Submissions for Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices; October 2, 2014.
## L. Test Principle:
The Xpert Xpress Strep A is performed on the GeneXpert XpressSystem (GeneXpert Xpress II and IV instruments) that automate nucleic acid extraction, amplification and detection in single-use, disposable cartridges. Each cartridge contains primers and probes for detection of the targeted region of the S. pyogenes chromosome (if present) and a Sample Processing Control (SPC). The SPC and a separate Probe Check Control (PCC) are used by the GeneXpert systems to monitor reagent and process integrity.
Throat swab specimens for testing with the Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay are collected using
{5}
the Copan Liquid Amies Elution Swab (ESwab) Collection and Transport System. Upon receipt in the testing laboratory, the ESwab tube is mixed by shaking and 300μL of the transport medium is added to an Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay cartridge using a disposable transfer pipette. The operator then initiates the test from the operator interface and loads the cartridge into the GeneXpert instrument, after which all process steps are performed automatically.
Once complete, the final result report can be viewed on-screen and/or printed. Results are reported as Strep A DETECTED, Strep A NOT DETECTED, , INSTRUMENT ERROR or NO RESULT-REPEAT TEST (If the result is NO RESULT-REPEAT TEST, then retest with a new cartridge. If the retest is NO RESULT-REPEAT TEST, call Cepheid Technical Support). Instructions for retesting are provided for samples with indeterminate results.
The Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay has an Early Termination Feature whereby results for samples that are strongly positive for S. pyogenes are reported prior to completion of the full number of PCR cycles designated in the assay definition file.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
Analytical studies for the Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay were described in submission K172126 that was cleared on September 25, 2017. All testing was performed using the same assay in this submission. No changes have been made to the design of the Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay since the 510(k) clearance of K172126. For this submission the data from all analytical studies (except Reproducibility study) is identical to those conducted in support of K172126 clearance. All analytical data was generated with GeneXpert Dx software using the GeneXpert Dx (GX-IV and GX-XVI) instrument and reanalyzed with GeneXpert Xpress software 5.0 The data re-analyzed with GeneXpert Xpress software 5.0 provided identical results to those original analysis with GeneXpert Dx software 4.7b.
### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
A multi-center study was conducted at three sites with three operators at each site. Each operator tested four-member panel comprised of positive samples with varying concentrations of Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC BAA-946 at three target concentrations levels and a negative sample (No Streptococcus pyogenes) in a liquid Amies media containing simulated throat swab matrix (Table 2). Each operator tested blinded panel twice per day over 5 testing days (3 operators x 2 times/day x 5 days x 3 sites=90 results). Three lots of Xpress Strep A Assay reagent were used in this study but only two lots of reagents were used at each testing site. All sites used the GeneXpert Xpress IV instrument. Samples were stored at 2-8°C until testing The data was generated with Xpress software 4.7c and re-analyzed with GeneXpert Dx 5.0 software. The Reproducibility data re-analysis, with GeneXpert Dx 5.0 software provided results identical to the original analysis, with GeneXpert Xpress software 4.7c. A summary of the reproducibility panel members is outlined in Table2.
6
{6}
Table 2. Summary of Reproducibility Study panel members
| S. pyogenes Strain | Analyte Level | Multiple of LoD | CFU/mL^{1} |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Not applicable^{2} | Negative | Not applicable | 0 |
| ATCC BAA-946 | High negative | ~0.05X LOD | ~0.5 |
| | Low Positive | ~1X | ~10 |
| | Moderate Positive | ~3X | ~30 |
ATCC: American Type Culture Collection; LoD: Limit of Detection
CFU per mL of ESwab transport medium
No Streptococcus pyogenes in a liquid Amies media containing simulated throat swab matrix.
Xpert Xpress A assays for 96.4% (347/360) of samples were successful on the first attempt. The indeterminate cases included 12 NO RESULT-REPEAT TEST results and one INSTRUMENT ERROR results. All of the 13 initially indeterminate cases were retested (per the assay instruction) and yielded valid results upon repeat testing. The overall rate of success was 100% (360/360). Reproducibility results are shown in detail in Table 3.
Table 3. Reproducibility Results Data
| Sample | Site 1 | | | | Site 2 | | | | Site 3 | | | | % Total Agreement by Sample^{a, b} |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Op 1 | Op 2 | Op 3 | Site | Op 1 | Op 2 | Op 3 | Site | Op 1 | Op 2 | Op 3 | Site | |
| Neg | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (30/30) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (30/30) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (30/30) | 100% (90/90) |
| Strep A
High Neg | 70% (7/10) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 90.0% (27/30) | 80.0% (8/10) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 93.0% (27/30) | 90.0% (9/10) | 100% (10/10) | 80% (8/9) | 90% (27/30) | 91.0% (82/90) |
| Strep A
Low Pos | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 90.0% (9/10) | 97.0% (29/30) | 100% (10/10) | 90% (9/10) | 100% (10/10) | 97.0% (29/30) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 90% (9/10) | 97.0% (29/30) | 97% (87/90) |
| Strep A
Mod Pos | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (30/30) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (30/30) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) | 100% (30/30) | 100% (90/90) |
a Agreement based on expected result: Neg and High Neg=expected negative; Low Pos and Mod Pos=expected positive
b Thirteen (13) indeterminate (12 NO RESULT-REPEAT TEST and 1 INSTRUMENT ERROR) results were obtained over the course of the study for an initial indeterminate rate of 3.6% (13/360). In all cases, the expected results were obtained upon retesting.
- A total of 100% of all negative samples produced a negative result (90/90).
- A total of 91% of high negative produced negative results (82/90)
- A total of 97% of the low positive produced positive results (87/90)
- A total of 100% of all moderate positive samples produced a positive result (90/90).
ANOVA (Analysis Of Variance) was also performed to assess the variance components of the Ct values for the S. pyogenes and SPC targets (Table 4). The total variation for all targets was between 1 and 1.9 Ct (2.6-5.5%).
{7}
Table 4. Summary of Ct variance components observed in the Reproducibility Study
| Sample | Target | N² | Ct | | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | Mean | Between Site | | Between Lot | | Between Day | | Between Operator | | Within Assay | | Total |
| | | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD |
| Negative | SPC* | 90 | 33.5 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 1.9 |
| High Negative | SPC | 82⁴ | 33.6 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 3.9 | 1.7 |
| Low Positive | SA¹ | 87³ | 38.6 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 3.4 | 1.3 |
| Moderate Positive | SA¹ | 90 | 37.2 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 1.0 |
* SPC: Sample Processing Control
¹ SA=Strep A
² Results with non-zero Ct values out of 90
³ Three (3) samples gave negative results for Group A Streptococcus
⁴ Eight (8) samples gave negative results for Group A Streptococcus
The Xpert Xpress Strep A test demonstrated acceptable reproducibility across sites, lot, operators and panel members.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
No additional studies were performed. All data for these studies were supported by the prior clearance. For studies and performance of the following, please refer to submission K172126: Traceability, Calibrator, Controls and Carry Over.
Additional information was provided for Specimen Stability, Reagent Stability and Cartridge Hold Time
Stability:
Stability studies have been performed in K172126 to support the following claims:
Specimen Stability:
The following specimen stability claims are supported by study data from K172126.:
- Room temperature (15-30°C) for up to 48 hours
- Refrigerated (2-8°C) for up to six days
Reagent Stability:
The following kit stability claims are supported by study data from K172126 with the following changes:
- Lot #0061 currently have twelve months of real-time stability data and nine months of real-time stability data for lots#0092 and #1002 at 2-28°C.
{8}
- The shipping simulation data product configuration for Xpert Xpress Strep A (120-test kit).
## Cartridge Hold Time:
The following stability claim for prepared samples tested with the Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay on the GeneXpert Infinity System are supported by study data from K172126:
- Up to 4.5 hours at room temperature is recommended.
d. Detection limit:
For detection limit and Analytical Reactivity/Inclusivity studies, please refer to submission K172126.
e. Analytical specificity:
For analytical specificity and Carry-over Contamination studies, please refer to submission K172126.
f. Assay cut-off:
Please refer to submission K172126.
g. Assay interference:
For Interfering Substances Microbial Interference studies, please refer to submission K172126.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Not applicable.
b. Matrix comparison:
For Comparison of Fresh versus. Frozen Cell Stock Equivalency and Comparison of Performance of Natural versus Simulated Matrices studies, please refer to submission K172126.
3. Clinical Studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity:
{9}
The performance of the Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay was conducted at a total of nine (9) clinical sites in the U.S. that were selected to be representative of the CLIA Waived testing environment (including emergency departments, urgent care centers, physician's offices and a walk-in clinic). The GeneXpert Operators who performed the Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay at each site were non-laboratory healthcare personnel, with no experience with either the Cepheid CW or moderately complex assays.
Throat swab specimen were prospectively collected in Liquid Amies medium (ESwab) from consented subjects presenting signs and symptoms of pharyngitis following collection of standard of care (SOC) swab specimens. Specimen were stored at 2-8°C until all testing was completed. The performance of the Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay was determined relative to the reference culture. Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay testing and the reference culture method were performed within 48 hours of specimen collection. Isolated colonies that exhibited β-hemolysis were typed by latex agglutination (Remel Streptex). Culture plates that did not exhibit β-hemolytic colonies after 48 hours were recorded as negative for Group A Streptococcus. The study was performed with the GeneXpert Xpress system (GeneXpert II and IV instrument). The data was generated with GeneXpert Xpress software 4.7c and reanalyzed with GeneXpert Xpress software 5.0.
A total of 666 specimens were collected from individual subjects initially enrolled in this clinical study. Of the 666 specimen, 43 specimen were excluded because of: lack of consent documents (10), previously enrolled subject (1), delay in shipment for reference culture testing (27), indeterminate culture results (4), and incorrect specimen type (1). Of the 623 eligible specimens, 4.7% (29/623) produced “NO RESULT-REPEAT TEST” and 0.6% (4/623) produced an “INSTRUMENT ERROR” with the Xpert Xpress Strep A test. Twenty eight out of twenty nine samples with NO RESULT-REPEAT test were retested and twenty five samples yielded valid results. Three out of four samples with INSTRUMENT ERROR were retested and three samples have yielded valid results. A total of 618 specimens were therefore included in the final evaluable data for analysis of performance. Specimens were prospectively collected. The results were compared to culture and latex agglutination for Strep A typing (Table 5).
10
{10}
Table 5. Expert Xpress Strep A Assay Clinical Performance vs Reference Culture
| | Reference Culture | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Xpert Xpress Strep A | Positive | 157 | 27^{1} | 184 |
| | Negative | 1^{3} | 433 | 434 |
| | Total | 158 | 460 | 618^{2} |
| Sensitivity | | 99.4% (157/158); (95% CI: 96.5-99.9%) | | |
| Specificity | | 94.1% (433/460); (95% CI: 91.6-95.9%) | | |
| Positive Predictive Value | | 85.3%(157/184) (95% CI: 79.5-89.7%) | | |
| Negative Predictive Value | | 99.8%(433/434) (95% CI: 98.7-100%) | | |
| Prevalence | | 25.6% (158/618) | | |
95% CI: Two-sided 95% score confidence interval
1 27 specimens were tested by an alternative PCR assay with bi-directional sequencing of the amplified products; 10/27 were positive for S. pyogenes and 5 out of these 10 positives were also positive by a rapid antigen test method used as the standard of care; 13/27 specimens were negative by the alternative PCR assay, but 1 out of these 13 was also positive by a rapid antigen test used as standard of care; 4/27 produced inconclusive results, and all four were also negative by rapid antigen testing.
2 On initial testing, 33/623 specimens (5.3%) produced indeterminate results (NO RESULT REPEAT TEST: 29/623; INSTRUMENT ERROR: 4/623)
The performance of the Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay stratified by clinical site is outlined in Table 6. These results are acceptable.
{11}
Table 6. Xpert Xpress Strep A performance stratified by site
| Site | Culture Positive (%) | Xpert Xpress Strep A (%; 95% Confidence Interval) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Sensitivity | Specificity1,2 |
| 1 | 1/5(20.0) | 1/1(100; 20.7-100) | 4/4(100; 51.0-100) |
| 2 | 8/22(36.4) | 8/8(100; 67.6-100) | 14/14(100; 78.5-100) |
| 3 | 9/24(37.5) | 9/9(100; 70.1-100) | 15/15(100; 79.6-100) |
| 4 | 19/36(52.8) | 19/19(100; 83.2-100) | 18/19(94.7; 75.4-99.1) |
| 5 | 3/25(12.0) | 3/3(100; 43.9-100) | 21/22(95.5; 78.2-99.2) |
| 6 | 6/24(25.0) | 5/6(83.3; 43.7-97.0) | 17/18(94.4; 74.2-99.0) |
| 7 | 53/218(24.3) | 53/53(100; 93.2-100) | 145/165(87.9; 82.0-92.0) |
| 8 | 24/97(24.7) | 24/24(100; 86.2-100) | 72/73(98.6; 92.6-99.8) |
| 9 | 35/165(21.2) | 35/35(100; 90.1-100) | 127/130(97.7; 93.4-99.2) |
| Total | 158/618(25.6) | 157/158(99.4; 96.5-100) | 433/460(94.1; 91.6-95.9) |
1 27 specimen were tested by an alternative PCR assay with bi-directional sequencing of the amplified products; 10/27 were positive for S. pyogenes
26/27 specimen (22.2) were positive by a rapid antigen test method used as the standard of care, which in 4 cases included culture.
b. Clinical specificity:
Refer to Section M(3)(a), above.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The performance of the Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay was evaluated in a Clinical Study conducted at multiple sites in the US (Section M(3)(a)). The total of 618 specimens included in the analysis of performance included 53.2% (329/618) male subject, and 46.7% (289/618) female subject.
{12}
The overall percentage of positive results for S. pyogenes (Group A Streptococcus) in throat swab specimens was 29.8% as determined by the Xpert Xpress Strep A assay and 25.6% as determined by culture. The positivity rate of Group A Streptococcus as determined by the Xpert Xpress Strep A assay is outlined in Table 7, stratified by the age and gender of the subjects.
Table 7. Prevalence of S. pyogenes positive subjects by age and gender
| Age/Gender | Number | Xpert Xpress Strep A Positive | % Positivity^{1} |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0 to 1 years | 6 | 1 | 16.7 |
| 2-5 years | 91 | 32 | 35.2 |
| 6-12 years | 336 | 129 | 38.4 |
| 13-21 years | 150 | 18 | 12.0 |
| >22-65 years | 34 | 5 | 14.7 |
| >65 years | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Male | 329 | 89 | 27.1 |
| Female | 289 | 95 | 32.9 |
| Total | 618 | 184 | 29.8 |
¹ As determined by the Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay
N. Instrument Name:
GeneXpert Xpress system (GeneXpert II and IV instrument) with GeneXpert Xpress software version 5.
Please refer to K172126 for other instrument systems that were cleared with Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay.
O. System Descriptions:
1. System Description:
The GeneXpert Xpress System automates and integrates sample purification, nucleic acid amplification and detection of target sequences within compatible, assay-specific, single-use cartridges. The instrument systems each contain a computer and preloaded software for running tests and viewing the results.
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X ☐ or No ☐
{13}
3. **Level of Concern:**
Moderate
4. **Specimen Identification:**
Barcode scan or manual entry.
5. **Specimen Sampling and Handling:**
Throat swab samples are collected using the Copan Liquid Amies Elution Swab (ESwab) and transported to the testing laboratory. The test operator briefly shakes the ESwab tube containing the swab to elute the sample and adds 300μL of the transport medium to an Xpert Xpress Strep A Assay cartridge using a transfer pipette. The operator then loads the cartridge into the GeneXpert System and initiates the run from the operator interface.
6. **Calibration:**
No calibration by the operator is required.
7. **Quality Control:**
Refer to K172126 for information on internal and external controls.
P. **Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:**
Not applicable.
Q. **Proposed Labeling:**
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. **Conclusion:**
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.