The SEKURE HbA1c assay is used to measure the percent concentration of hemoglobin A1c (NGSP) or the HbA1c fraction mmol/mol (IFCC) in human venous whole blood and hemolysate on the SK500 Clinical Chemistry System. Measurement of hemoglobin A1c is used as an aid in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, as an aid in the identification of patients at risk for development of diabetes mellitus, and for the monitoring of long-term blood glucose control in individuals with diabetes mellitus. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only
Device Story
SEKURE HbA1c Assay is an enzymatic in vitro diagnostic test for quantitative measurement of HbA1c in human venous whole blood or hemolysate. Used on the SK500 Clinical Chemistry System (Biolis 50i Superior). Assay utilizes a pre-treatment hemolyzing buffer and two working reagents. The system measures HbA1c concentration and calculates results in NGSP (%) or IFCC (mmol/mol) units. Operated by laboratory personnel in clinical settings. Output provides clinicians with objective data to diagnose diabetes, identify pre-diabetic patients, and monitor long-term glycemic control. Benefits include standardized, automated assessment of long-term blood glucose levels to guide therapeutic management of diabetes.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated via 20-day study (CLSI EP05-A3) across 3 lots/analyzers. Linearity confirmed (CLSI EP06-A) across 4.19–15.82% HbA1c. Method comparison (n=130) against Tosoh G8 HPLC showed high correlation (R² > 0.99). Interference studies (CLSI EP07-A2) confirmed no significant interference from common endogenous substances or drugs, except for fetal hemoglobin (HbF).
Technological Characteristics
Enzymatic assay; reagents include protease, peroxidase, and fructosyl-peptide-oxidase. Bichromatic measurement at 505/800nm (THb) and 660/800nm (HbA1c). Platform: Sekisui SK500 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer. Connectivity: System-integrated. Calibration: Multipoint curve using blank, Calibrator 1, and Calibrator 2. Standards: CLSI EP05-A3, EP06-A, EP07-A2, EP17-A2.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use in human venous whole blood and hemolysate to measure HbA1c concentration for diabetes diagnosis, identification of pre-diabetes risk, and monitoring long-term glucose control. Contraindicated for neonatal blood, patients with elevated fetal hemoglobin (HbF), hemoglobinopathies (unless validated), abnormal red blood cell turnover, malignancies, or severe chronic hepatic/renal disease. Not for use in pregnancy or gestational diabetes diagnosis.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hemoglobin A1c test system is a device used to measure the percentage concentration of hemoglobin A1c in blood. Measurement of hemoglobin A1c is used as an aid in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and as an aid in the identification of patients at risk for developing diabetes mellitus.
Special Controls
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). Hemoglobin A1c test systems must comply with the following special controls: 1) The device must have initial and annual standardization verification by a certifying glycohemoglobin standardization organization deemed acceptable by FDA. 2) The premarket notification submission must include performance testing to evaluate precision, accuracy, linearity and interference, including the following: i) Performance testing of device precision must, at a minimum, use blood samples with concentrations near 5.0%, 6.5%, 8.0% and 12% hemoglobin A1c. This testing must evaluate precision over a minimum of 20 days using at least 3 lots of the device and 3 instruments, as applicable. ii) Performance testing of device accuracy must include a minimum of 120 blood samples that span the measuring interval of the new device and compare results of the new device to results of the standardized test method. Results must demonstrate little or no bias versus the standardized method. iii) Total error of the new device must be evaluated using single measurements by the new device compared to results of the standardized test method, and this evaluation must demonstrate a total error less than or equal to 6%. iv) Performance testing must demonstrate that there is little to no interference from common hemoglobin variants, including Hemoglobin C, Hemoglobin D, Hemoglobin E, Hemoglobin A2 and Hemoglobin S. 3) When assay interference from Hemoglobin F or interference with other hemoglobin variants with low frequency in the population is observed, a warning statement must be placed in a black box and must appear in all labeling material for these devices describing the interference and any affected populations.
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) The device must have initial and annual standardization verification by a certifying glycohemoglobin standardization organization deemed acceptable by FDA.
(2) The premarket notification submission must include performance testing to evaluate precision, accuracy, linearity, and interference, including the following:
(i) Performance testing of device precision must, at a minimum, use blood samples with concentrations near 5.0 percent, 6.5 percent, 8.0 percent, and 12 percent hemoglobin A1c. This testing must evaluate precision over a minimum of 20 days using at least three lots of the device and three instruments, as applicable.
(ii) Performance testing of device accuracy must include a minimum of 120 blood samples that span the measuring interval of the device and compare results of the new device to results of a standardized test method. Results must demonstrate little or no bias versus the standardized method.
(iii) Total error of the new device must be evaluated using single measurements by the new device compared to results of the standardized test method, and this evaluation must demonstrate a total error less than or equal to 6 percent.
(iv) Performance testing must demonstrate that there is little to no interference from common hemoglobin variants, including Hemoglobin C, Hemoglobin D, Hemoglobin E, Hemoglobin A2, and Hemoglobin S.
(3) When assay interference from Hemoglobin F or interference with other hemoglobin variants with low frequency in the population is observed, a warning statement must be placed in a black box and must appear in all labeling material for these devices describing the interference and any affected populations.
Predicate Devices
Architect Hemoglobin A1c (k130255)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k173206
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, enzymatic
E. Applicant:
Sekisui Diagnostics PEI Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
SEKURE HbA1c Assay
G. Regulatory Information:
| Regulatory Description | Classification | Regulation | Product Code | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hemoglobin A1c Test System | II | 21 CFR 862.1373 | PDJ | Chemistry, 75 |
| Glycosylated Hemoglobin Assay | II | 21 CFR 864.7470 | LCP | Hematology, 81 |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
{1}
2. Indication(s) for use:
The SEKURE HbA1c assay is used to measure the percent concentration of hemoglobin A1c (NGSP) or the HbA1c fraction mmol/mol (IFCC) in human venous whole blood and hemolysate on the SK500 Clinical Chemistry System.
Measurement of hemoglobin A1c is used as an aid in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, as an aid in the identification of patients at risk for development of diabetes mellitus, and for the monitoring of long-term blood glucose control in individuals with diabetes mellitus.
For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
- For prescription use only
- For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only
- This device has significant negative interference with fetal hemoglobin (HbF). HbA1c results are invalid for patients with elevated amounts of HbF including those with known Hereditary Persistence of Fetal Hemoglobin.
- The HbA1c assay should not be used to diagnose diabetes during pregnancy or in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes. HbA1c reflects the average blood glucose levels over the preceding 3 months (i.e., the average life span of a red blood cell) and therefore may be falsely low during pregnancy or any other condition associated with recent onset of hyperglycemia and/or decreased red blood cell survival.
- Do not use for testing neonatal blood
- The HbA1c assay should not be used to diagnose or monitor diabetes in patients with the following conditions:
- hemoglobinopathies, except as demonstrated to produce acceptable performance (see PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS section of this package insert)
- abnormal red blood cell turnover (e.g., anemias from hemolysis and iron deficiency)
- malignancies, and severe chronic hepatic and renal disease
- In cases of rapidly evolving Type 1 diabetes, the increase of HbA1c values might be delayed compared to the acute increase in glucose concentrations. In these conditions, diabetes mellitus must be diagnosed based on plasma glucose concentrations and/or the typical clinical symptoms.
- This test should not replace glucose testing for patients with Type 1 diabetes, pediatric patients, or pregnant women.
{2}
- Glycated HbF is not detected by the assay as it does not contain the β-chain that characterizes HbA1c. However, HbF is measured in the total Hb assay and as a consequence, specimens containing elevated amounts of HbF may result in lower than expected mmol/mol HbA1c values (IFCC) and %HbA1c values (NGSP).
- The HbA1c assay is susceptible to interference effects from conjugated bilirubin at > 18 mg/dL (216 μmol/L) and unconjugated bilirubin at > 18 mg/dL (307.8 μmol/L).
4. Special instrument requirements:
Sekisui SK500 Analyzer
I. Device Description:
The SEKURE HbA1c assay is an enzymatic assay for the measurement of the percent hemoglobin A1c concentration. The assay consists of a pre-treatment hemolyzing buffer solution and two working reagents. Testing is performed on the SK500 Analyzer in conjunction with calibrators and controls which are provided separately.
Reagent 1 is a ready for use solution containing 10-(carboxymethylaminocarbonyl)-3,7-bis(dimethylamino)-phenothiazine sodium salt (0.000817%), Protease (Bacterial; < 1 MU/dL), sodium azide (< 0.1 %) as a stabilizer and preservative, and ProClin 300 as a preservative.
Reagent 2 is ready for use and contains Peroxidase (Horseradish; 5 to 15 kU/dL), Fructosyl-peptide-oxidase (E. coli, recombinant; 300 to 900 U/dL), ofloxacin as a preservative. Pretreatment is a ready for use solution containing Sodium nitrite (> 0.05 to < 0.3%), and ProClin 300 as a preservative.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Architect Hemoglobin A1c
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k130255
{3}
# 3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Characteristics | Candidate Device SEKURE HbA1c Assay (k173206) | Predicate Device Hemoglobin A1c Assay (k130255) |
| Intended Use and Indications for Use | To measure the percent concentration of HbA1c (NGSP) or the HbA1c fraction mmol/mol (IFCC) in human venous whole blood and hemolysate. Measurement of hemoglobin A1c is used as an aid in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, as an aid in the identification of patients at risk for development of diabetes mellitus, and for the monitoring of long-term blood glucose control in individuals with diabetes mellitus. | Same |
| Methodology | Enzymatic | Same |
| Traceability | Traceable to the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) and Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) reference method. Certified via the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) | Same |
| Measuring Interval | 4.0 to 14.0% HbA1c (DCCT/NGSP) 20.02 to 129.34 mmol/mol HbA1c (IFCC) | Same |
{4}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Characteristics | Candidate Device
SEKURE HbA1c Assay | Predicate Device
Hemoglobin A1c Assay (k130255) |
| Specimen Type | Whole blood and hemolysate,
Dipotassium EDTA,
Tripotassium EDTA,
Sodium Fluoride/
Disodium EDTA | Whole blood and hemolysate,
Dipotassium EDTA,
Lithium Heparin,
Sodium Heparin,
Tripotassium EDTA
Sodium Fluoride/Disodium EDTA |
| Platform | SK500 (k103531) (Clinical Chemistry Analyzer) | ARCHITECT c 8000 (Clinical Chemistry Analyzer) |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP06-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measuring Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP05-A3: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline – Third Edition
CLSI EP07-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry, Approved Guideline – Second Edition
CLSI EP17-A2: Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantification; Approved Guideline – Second Edition
L. Test Principle:
The SEKURE HbA1c assay consists of two separate concentration measurements obtained during a single analysis: Total hemoglobin (THb) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). The two concentrations are used to determine the percent HbA1c (NGSP units) or the hemoglobin fraction in mmol/mol (IFCC units). The individual concentration values of HbA1c and THb generated by the SEKURE HbA1c assay are used only for calculating the percent HbA1c or HbA1c fraction, and must not be used individually for diagnostic purposes.
The SEKURE HbA1c assay is calibrated using a multipoint calibration curve. The calibration is performed using the Blank Solution, Calibrator 1 and Calibrator 2. The Blank solution is used as a zero point calibrator, and contains peroxidase to eliminate noise generated by the reagent. The Blank Solution, Calibrator 1 and Calibrator 2 are available separately.
Pre-treatment: The anticoagulated whole blood sample is lysed using the HbA1c Pre-
{5}
treatment solution. The addition of the Pre-treatment solution to the whole blood sample can occur automatically on board the SK500 or may be carried out manually before the sample is placed on board. In the pre-treatment process, the erythrocytes are lysed and the hemoglobin is transformed to methemoglobin by reaction with sodium nitrite.
Total Hemoglobin (THb): The hemoglobin is oxidized to stable methemoglobin azide by the action of sodium nitrite and sodium azide and the concentration of the hemoglobin is determined by bichromatic measurement at 505nm and 800nm.
Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c): The SEKURE HbA1c assay utilizes an enzymatic method that specifically measures N-terminal fructosyl dipeptides of the β-chain of HbA1c. With the addition of Reagent 1 to the sample, the glycosylated N- terminal dipeptide (fructosyl-VH) of the β- chain of hemoglobin is released by the action of protease. Following addition of Reagent 2 fructosyl peptideoxidase (FPOX) reacts with fructosyl-VH to produce Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂). The Hydrogen Peroxide reacts with the coloring agent in the presence of Peroxidase (POD) to develop color. The change in absorbance is measured to calculate HbA1c concentration by bichromatic measurement at 660nm and 800nm.
Hemoglobin A1c Calculations: The final result may be expressed as either % HbA1c (NGSP) or mmol/mol HbA1c (IFCC) and is automatically calculated by the system from the HbA1c/THb ratio.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
**Within-Laboratory Precision (20-Day)**
A 20-day precision study was conducted to evaluate the precision performance of the SEKURE HbA1c assay based on guidance from the CLSI document EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods. The within-lab study was conducted using 3 lots of SEKURE HbA1c reagent on 3 SK500 analyzers and 3 different lots of calibrators for both whole blood and hemolysate applications. The whole blood assay was performed using BioRad Hemoglobin A1c Controls (level 1 and 2 abbreviated below as QC1/QC2) and 4 levels of pooled human K₂ EDTA anticoagulated venous whole blood run in duplicate, twice a day for twenty days. The hemolysate assay included Low and High Controls (abbreviated below as QC1/QC2) as well as 4 levels of pooled human K₂ EDTA anticoagulated venous whole blood run in duplicate, twice a day for twenty days. Each lot of reagent was run on each SK500 for a total of 9 analyzer/lot combinations.
{6}
Instrument #1, NGSP Whole Blood
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 5.22 | 0.048 | 0.9 | 0.033 | 0.6 | 0.040 | 0.8 | 0.044 | 0.8 | 0.070 | 1.3 |
| QC 2 | 9.78 | 0.054 | 0.6 | 0.047 | 0.5 | 0.050 | 0.5 | 0.040 | 0.4 | 0.088 | 0.9 |
| Pool 1 | 5.00 | 0.030 | 0.6 | 0.040 | 0.8 | 0.029 | 0.6 | 0.057 | 1.1 | 0.058 | 1.2 |
| Pool 2 | 6.32 | 0.033 | 0.5 | 0.040 | 0.6 | 0.032 | 0.5 | 0.061 | 1.0 | 0.061 | 1.0 |
| Pool 3 | 7.78 | 0.033 | 0.4 | 0.049 | 0.6 | 0.027 | 0.3 | 0.065 | 0.8 | 0.065 | 0.8 |
| Pool 4 | 12.05 | 0.032 | 0.3 | 0.051 | 0.4 | 0.058 | 0.5 | 0.071 | 0.6 | 0.084 | 0.7 |
Instrument #2, NGSP Whole Blood
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 5.22 | 0.057 | 1.1 | 0.022 | 0.4 | 0.58 | 1.1 | 0.040 | 0.8 | 0.084 | 1.6 |
| QC 2 | 9.77 | 0.063 | 0.6 | 0.024 | 0.2 | 0.64 | 0.7 | 0.038 | 0.4 | 0.093 | 0.9 |
| Pool 1 | 5.00 | 0.054 | 1.1 | 0.033 | 0.7 | 0.043 | 0.9 | 0.051 | 1.0 | 0.076 | 1.5 |
| Pool 2 | 6.33 | 0.047 | 0.7 | 0.035 | 0.6 | 0.054 | 0.8 | 0.052 | 0.8 | 0.079 | 1.3 |
| Pool 3 | 7.79 | 0.039 | 0.5 | 0.037 | 0.5 | 0.055 | 0.7 | 0.052 | 0.7 | 0.076 | 1.0 |
| Pool 4 | 12.08 | 0.032 | 0.3 | 0.044 | 0.4 | 0.069 | 0.6 | 0.056 | 0.5 | 0.088 | 0.7 |
Instrument #3, NGSP Whole Blood
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 5.24 | 0.058 | 1.1 | 0.032 | 0.6 | 0.067 | 1.3 | 0.070 | 1.3 | 0.094 | 1.8 |
| QC 2 | 9.78 | 0.062 | 0.6 | 0.030 | 0.3 | 0.070 | 0.7 | 0.045 | 0.5 | 0.099 | 1.0 |
| Pool 1 | 5.01 | 0.042 | 0.8 | 0.031 | 0.6 | 0.050 | 1.0 | 0.059 | 1.2 | 0.073 | 1.5 |
| Pool 2 | 6.34 | 0.043 | 0.7 | 0.037 | 0.6 | 0.057 | 0.9 | 0.063 | 1.0 | 0.080 | 1.3 |
| Pool 3 | 7.81 | 0.040 | 0.5 | 0.040 | 0.5 | 0.056 | 0.7 | 0.061 | 0.8 | 0.080 | 1.0 |
| Pool 4 | 12.08 | 0.042 | 0.3 | 0.044 | 0.4 | 0070 | 0.6 | 0.056 | 0.5 | 0.092 | 0.8 |
Instruments (combined), NGSP Whole Blood
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Instruments | | Between Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 5.23 | 0.055 | 1.1 | 0.028 | 0.5 | 0.056 | 1.1 | 0.053 | 1.0 | 0.009 | 0.2 | 0.083 | 1.6 |
| QC 2 | 9.77 | 0.064 | 0.7 | 0.037 | 0.4 | 0.061 | 0.6 | 0.041 | 0.4 | 0.004 | 0.0 | 0.096 | 1.0 |
| Pool 1 | 5.01 | 0.044 | 0.9 | 0.034 | 0.7 | 0.041 | 0.8 | 0.056 | 1.1 | 0.007 | 0.1 | 0.069 | 1.4 |
| Pool 2 | 6.33 | 0.045 | 0.7 | 0.037 | 0.6 | 0.047 | 0.7 | 0.059 | 0.9 | 0.011 | 0.2 | 0.074 | 1.2 |
| Pool 3 | 7.79 | 0.037 | 0.5 | 0.044 | 0.6 | 0.045 | 0.6 | 0.059 | 0.8 | 0.015 | 0.2 | 0.074 | 0.9 |
| Pool 4 | 12.07 | 0.036 | 0.3 | 0.049 | 0.4 | 0.067 | 0.6 | 0.061 | 0.5 | 0.021 | 0.2 | 0.091 | 0.8 |
{7}
Instrument #1, NGSP Hemolysate
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 4.99 | 0.039 | 0.8 | 0.026 | 0.5 | 0.025 | 0.5 | 0.010 | 0.2 | 0.053 | 1.1 |
| QC 2 | 9.61 | 0.034 | 0.4 | 0.035 | 0.4 | 0.033 | 0.3 | 0.014 | 0.1 | 0.059 | 0.6 |
| Pool 1 | 4.99 | 0.027 | 0.5 | 0.039 | 0.8 | 0.025 | 0.5 | 0.062 | 1.2 | 0.053 | 1.1 |
| Pool 2 | 6.32 | 0.030 | 0.5 | 0.040 | 0.6 | 0.031 | 0.5 | 0.063 | 1.0 | 0.059 | 0.9 |
| Pool 3 | 7.79 | 0.020 | 0.3 | 0.043 | 0.6 | 0.035 | 0.4 | 0.063 | 0.8 | 0.059 | 0.8 |
| Pool 4 | 12.03 | 0.042 | 0.3 | 0.048 | 0.4 | 0.054 | 0.5 | 0.071 | 0.6 | 0.084 | 0.7 |
Instrument #2, NGSP Hemolysate
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 4.98 | 0.044 | 0.9 | 0.031 | 0.6 | 0.035 | 0.7 | 0.018 | 0.4 | 0.064 | 1.3 |
| QC 2 | 9.61 | 0.034 | 0.3 | 0.042 | 0.4 | 0.028 | 0.3 | 0.030 | 0.3 | 0.060 | 0.6 |
| Pool 1 | 5.00 | 0.036 | 0.7 | 0.023 | 0.5 | 0.043 | 0.9 | 0.052 | 1.0 | 0.060 | 1.2 |
| Pool 2 | 6.34 | 0.036 | 0.6 | 0.031 | 0.5 | 0.045 | 0.7 | 0.050 | 0.8 | 0.066 | 1.0 |
| Pool 3 | 7.81 | 0.031 | 0.4 | 0.045 | 0.6 | 0.048 | 0.6 | 0.046 | 0.6 | 0.072 | 0.9 |
| Pool 4 | 12.06 | 0.042 | 0.3 | 0.042 | 0.3 | 0.057 | 0.5 | 0.048 | 0.4 | 0.083 | 0.7 |
Instrument #3, NGSP Hemolysate
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 5.00 | 0.055 | 1.1 | 0.036 | 0.7 | 0.037 | 0.7 | 0.017 | 0.3 | 0.075 | 1.5 |
| QC 2 | 9.62 | 0.037 | 0.4 | 0.045 | 0.5 | 0.042 | 0.4 | 0.013 | 0.1 | 0.072 | 0.7 |
| Pool 1 | 5.01 | 0.034 | 0.7 | 0.025 | 0.5 | 0.045 | 0.9 | 0.064 | 1.3 | 0.062 | 1.2 |
| Pool 2 | 6.35 | 0.037 | 0.6 | 0.033 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.8 | 0.059 | 0.9 | 0.071 | 1.1 |
| Pool 3 | 7.82 | 0.032 | 0.4 | 0.059 | 0.7 | 0.048 | 0.6 | 0.061 | 0.8 | 0.082 | 1.1 |
| Pool 4 | 12.06 | 0.052 | 0.4 | 0.044 | 0.4 | 0.057 | 0.5 | 0.052 | 0.4 | 0.089 | 0.7 |
{8}
Instruments (combined) NGSP Hemolysate
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Instruments | | Between Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 4.99 | 0.048 | 1.0 | 0.032 | 0.6 | 0.035 | 0.7 | 0.015 | 0.3 | 0.009 | 0.2 | 0.067 | 1.4 |
| QC 2 | 9.61 | 0.037 | 0.4 | 0.046 | 0.5 | 0.036 | 0.4 | 0.021 | 0.2 | 0.009 | 0.1 | 0.069 | 0.7 |
| Pool 1 | 5.00 | 0.033 | 0.7 | 0.032 | 0.6 | 0.037 | 0.7 | 0.059 | 1.2 | 0.008 | 0.2 | 0.060 | 1.2 |
| Pool 2 | 6.34 | 0.036 | 0.6 | 0.036 | 0.6 | 0.041 | 0.6 | 0.057 | 0.9 | 0.011 | 0.2 | 0.066 | 1.0 |
| Pool 3 | 7.81 | 0.029 | 0.4 | 0.055 | 0.7 | 0.037 | 0.5 | 0.057 | 0.7 | 0.017 | 0.2 | 0.073 | 0.9 |
| Pool 4 | 12.05 | 0.048 | 0.4 | 0.47 | 0.4 | 0.054 | 0.5 | 0.058 | 0.5 | 0.021 | 0.2 | 0.086 | 0.7 |
Instrument #1 IFCC Whole Blood
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c Mmol/mol | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 33.57 | 0.521 | 1.6 | 0.362 | 1.1 | 0.433 | 1.3 | 0.479 | 1.4 | 0.768 | 2.3 |
| QC 2 | 83.38 | 0.595 | 0.7 | 0.518 | 0.6 | 0.548 | 0.7 | 0.442 | 0.5 | 0.961 | 1.2 |
| Pool 1 | 31.12 | 0.326 | 1.0 | 0.438 | 1.4 | 0.316 | 1.0 | 0.627 | 2.0 | 0.631 | 2.0 |
| Pool 2 | 45.53 | 0.357 | 0.8 | 0.441 | 1.0 | 0.352 | 0.8 | 0.669 | 1.5 | 0.667 | 1.5 |
| Pool 3 | 61.48 | 0.360 | 0.6 | 0.539 | 0.9 | 0.293 | 0.5 | 0.713 | 1.2 | 0.711 | 1.2 |
| Pool 4 | 108.17 | 0.347 | 0.3 | 0.552 | 0.5 | 0.638 | 0.6 | 0.772 | 0.7 | 0.913 | 0.8 |
Instrument #2 IFCC Whole Blood
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c Mmol/mol | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 33.52 | 0.622 | 1.9 | 0.244 | 0.7 | 0.631 | 1.9 | 0.432 | 1.3 | 0.919 | 2.7 |
| QC 2 | 88.28 | 0.688 | 0.8 | 0.260 | 0.3 | 0.694 | 0.8 | 0.412 | 0.5 | 1.011 | 1.2 |
| Pool 1 | 31.17 | 0.587 | 1.9 | 0.355 | 1.1 | 0.467 | 1.5 | 0.559 | 1.8 | 0.830 | 2.7 |
| Pool 2 | 45.63 | 0.514 | 1.1 | 0.382 | 0.8 | 0.586 | 1.3 | 0.572 | 1.3 | 0.868 | 1.9 |
| Pool 3 | 61.68 | 0.428 | 0.7 | 0.400 | 0.6 | 0.595 | 1.0 | 0.566 | 0.9 | 0.835 | 1.4 |
| Pool 4 | 108.55 | 0.350 | 0.3 | 0.485 | 0.4 | 0.752 | 0.7 | 0.610 | 0.6 | 0.961 | 0.9 |
{9}
Instrument #3 IFCC Whole Blood
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c Mmol/mol | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 33.71 | 0.629 | 1.9 | 0.345 | 1.0 | 0.736 | 2.2 | 0.760 | 2.3 | 1.028 | 3.0 |
| QC 2 | 83.33 | 0.679 | 0.8 | 0.333 | 0.4 | 0.768 | 0.9 | 0.495 | 0.6 | 1.078 | 1.3 |
| Pool 1 | 31.28 | 0.460 | 1.5 | 0.341 | 1.1 | 0.550 | 1.8 | 0.646 | 2.1 | 0.795 | 2.5 |
| Pool 2 | 45.76 | 0.468 | 1.0 | 0.402 | 0.9 | 0.626 | 1.4 | 0.684 | 1.5 | 0.879 | 1.9 |
| Pool 3 | 61.81 | 0.433 | 0.7 | 0.440 | 0.7 | 0.615 | 1.0 | 0.662 | 1.1 | 0.872 | 1.4 |
| Pool 4 | 108.57 | 0.461 | 0.4 | 0.476 | 0.4 | 0.761 | 0.7 | 0.611 | 0.6 | 1.009 | 0.9 |
Instruments (combined) IFCC Whole Blood
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c Mmol/mol | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Instruments | | Between Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 33.60 | 0.600 | 1.8 | 0.302 | 0.9 | 0.617 | 1.8 | 0.576 | 1.7 | 0.101 | 0.3 | 0.912 | 2.7 |
| QC 2 | 83.33 | 0.698 | 0.8 | 0.407 | 0.5 | 0.667 | 0.8 | 0.451 | 0.5 | 0.048 | 0.1 | 1.047 | 1.3 |
| Pool 1 | 31.19) | 0.482 | 1.5 | 0.74 | 1.2 | 0.452 | 1.4 | 0.612 | 2.0 | 0.081 | 0.3 | 0.759 | 2.4 |
| Pool 2 | 45.64 | 0.488 | 1.1 | 0.406 | 0.9 | 0.509 | 1.1 | 0.643 | 1.4 | 0.118 | 0.3 | 0.814 | 1.8 |
| Pool 3 | 61.66 | 0.406 | 0.7 | 0.486 | 0.8 | 0.495 | 0.8 | 0.650 | 1.1 | 0.166 | 0.3 | 0.804 | 1.3 |
| Pool 4 | 108.43 | 0.394 | 0.4 | 0.539 | 0.5 | 0.731 | 0.7 | 0.669 | 0.6 | 0.227 | 0.2 | 0.990 | 0.9 |
Instrument #1 IFCC Hemolysate
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c Mmol/mol | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 30.98 | 0.425 | 1.4 | 0.289 | 0.9 | 0.273 | 0.9 | 0.104 | 0.3 | 0.582 | 1.9 |
| QC 2 | 81.47 | 0.375 | 0.5 | 0.381 | 0.5 | 0.365 | 0.4 | 0.157 | 0.2 | 0.647 | 0.8 |
| Pool 1 | 31.04 | 0.293 | 0.9 | 0.421 | 1.4 | 0.274 | 0.9 | 0.674 | 2.2 | 0.581 | 1.9 |
| Pool 2 | 45.61 | 0.328 | 0.7 | 0.440 | 1.0 | 0.335 | 0.7 | 0.689 | 1.5 | 0.642 | 1.4 |
| Pool 3 | 61.60 | 0.216 | 0.4 | 0.471 | 0.8 | 0.379 | 0.6 | 0.691 | 1.1 | 0.642 | 1.0 |
| Pool 4 | 107.93 | 0.456 | 0.4 | 0.530 | 0.5 | 0.592 | 0.5 | 0.776 | 0.7 | 0.916 | 0.8 |
{10}
Instrument #2 IFCC Hemolysate
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c Mmol/mol | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 30.94 | 0.476 | 1.5 | 0.338 | 1.1 | 0.383 | 1.2 | 0.197 | 0.6 | 0.698 | 2.3 |
| QC 2 | 81.56 | 0.366 | 0.4 | 0.457 | 0.6 | 0.304 | 0.4 | 0.327 | 0.4 | 0.660 | 0.8 |
| Pool 1 | 31.12 | 0.398 | 1.3 | 0.251 | 0.8 | 0.465 | 1.5 | 0.572 | 1.8 | 0.661 | 2.1 |
| Pool 2 | 45.77 | 0.398 | 0.9 | 0.337 | 0.7 | 0.497 | 1.1 | 0.546 | 1.2 | 0.720 | 1.6 |
| Pool 3 | 61.83 | 0.337 | 0.5 | 0.491 | 0.8 | 0.521 | 0.8 | 0.505 | 0.8 | 0.791 | 1.3 |
| Pool 4 | 108.32 | 0.460 | 0.4 | 0.458 | 0.4 | 0.628 | 0.6 | 0.524 | 0.5 | 0.903 | 0.8 |
Instrument #3 IFCC Hemolysate
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c Mmol/mol | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 31.13 | 0.601 | 1.9 | 0.394 | 1.3 | 0.402 | 1.3 | 0.181 | 0.6 | 0.824 | 2.6 |
| QC 2 | 81.67 | 0.406 | 0.5 | 0.496 | 0.6 | 0.457 | 0.6 | 0.144 | 0.2 | 0.787 | 1.0 |
| Pool 1 | 31.22 | 0.370 | 1.2 | 0.274 | 0.9 | 0.494 | 1.6 | 0.696 | 2.2 | 0.676 | 2.2 |
| Pool 2 | 45.84 | 0.405 | 0.9 | 0.364 | 0.8 | 0.551 | 1.2 | 0.642 | 1.4 | 0.775 | 1.7 |
| Pool 3 | 61.96 | 0.352 | 0.6 | 0.642 | 1.0 | 0.527 | 0.9 | 0.661 | 1.1 | 0.902 | 1.5 |
| Pool 4 | 108.34 | 0.570 | 0.5 | 0.486 | 0.4 | 0.623 | 0.6 | 0.567 | 0.5 | 0.974 | 0.9 |
Instruments (combined) IFCC Hemolysate
| Sample ID | Mean HbA1c Mmol /mol | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Instruments | | Between Lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| QC 1 | 31.02 | 0.524 | 1.7 | 0.351 | 1.1 | 0.380 | 1.2 | 0.166 | 0.5 | 0.104 | 0.3 | 0.736 | 2.4 |
| QC 2 | 81.57 | 0.402 | 0.5 | 0.500 | 0.6 | 0.395 | 0.5 | 0.226 | 0.3 | 0.100 | 0.1 | 0.754 | 0.9 |
| Pool 1 | 31.13 | 0.366 | 1.2 | 0.354 | 1.1 | 0.409 | 1.3 | 0.650 | 2.1 | 0.092 | 0.3 | 0.653 | 2.1 |
| Pool 2 | 45.74 | 0.398 | 0.9 | 0.397 | 0.9 | 0.449 | 1.0 | 0.629 | 1.4 | 0.117 | 0.3 | 0.719 | 1.6 |
| Pool 3 | 61.80 | 0.314 | 0.5 | 0.604 | 1.0 | 0.408 | 0.7 | 0.624 | 1.0 | 0.182 | 0.3 | 0.794 | 1.3 |
| Pool 4 | 108.20 | 0.528 | 0.5 | 0.510 | 0.5 | 0.593 | 0.5 | 0.632 | 0.6 | 0.234 | 0.2 | 0.944 | 0.9 |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity studies were conducted in accordance with CLSI EP06-A. Linearity testing was conducted using human venous whole blood specimens collected in $\mathrm{K}_2\mathrm{EDTA}$ , two lots of SEKURE HbA1c reagent and calibrators on one SK500 analyzer. A dilution series consisting of 11 levels across the assay range was prepared by mixing
{11}
high and low HbA1c K2EDTA venous whole blood samples. Four replicates were tested at each level. The mean observed %HbA1c value was determined for each intermediate dilution and plotted versus the relative analyte concentration. The following table summarizes the linear regression results obtained from one representative lot generated using both NGSP (%HbA1c) and IFCC units (mmol/mol).
NGSP:
| Slope | Intercept | R² | Concentration Range Tested |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.042 | -0.325 | 0.9983 | 4.19 – 15.82 % HbA1c |
IFCC:
| Slope | Intercept | R² | Concentration Range Tested |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.041 | -2.371 | 0.9976 | 22.17 – 149.23 mmol/mol HbA1c |
The linearity study supports the claimed measuring range of 4.0 to 14.0 %HbA1c (NGSP) or 20.02 to 129.34 mmol/mol HbA1c (IFCC).
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability:
The SEKURE HbA1c assay is traceable to the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) reference calibrators. The SEKURE HbA1c assay is NGSP certified. The NGSP certification expires in one year. See NGSP website for current certification at http://www.ngsp.org.
The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) units of mmol/mol are calculated using the Master Equation NGSP (%) = 0.09148 x IFCC (mmol/mol) + 2.152. HbA1c results are provided to the customers using two different units: NGSP equivalent units (%) and IFCC equivalent units (mmol/mol).
d. Detection limit:
Limit of Blank (LoB) and Limit of Detection (LoD) were determined using CLSI Guidance EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures. Testing was performed using 5 blank samples for LoB and 5 low concentration samples for LoD. The samples were analyzed in quadruplicate using 2 lots of SEKURE HbA1c reagent on 2 SK500 analyzers. The detection limits are summarized in the tables below:
| Limit | %HbA1c | μmol/L A1c | μmol/L tHb |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Limit of Blank (LoB) | 3.27 | 0.66 | 0.2 |
| Limit of Detection (LoD) | 3.32 | 0.75 | 0.5 |
{12}
# e. Analytical specificity:
i.) An interference study was performed according to CLSI EP07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline – Second Edition to assess endogenous substances that could interfere with the SEKURE HbA1c assay. All interferents were tested at $\%$ HbA1c concentrations of $\sim 6.5$ and $8.0\%$ in replicates of ten. Potential interferents were added individually to aliquots of a $\mathrm{K}_2$ EDTA venous whole blood specimen pool. A control portion of the same matrix was prepared and adjusted for volume with the same solvent used to prepare the interferent stock solution. Significant interference was defined by the sponsor as $>5\%$ deviation from the control (aliquot with no interfering substance). Results demonstrated that no significant interference was observed with the following substances up to the listed concentrations:
Analytical Specificity (Endogenous Interferents)
| Potential Interferent | Highest Tested Concentration at which no significant interference was observed |
| --- | --- |
| Conjugated Bilirubin | 18 mg/dL |
| Unconjugated Bilirubin | 18 mg/dL |
| Total Protein | 22 g/dL |
| Triglycerides | 3000 mg/dL |
| Rheumatoid Factor | 200 IU/mL |
| Ascorbic Acid | 3.0 mg/dL |
| Urea | 667 mg/dL |
| Vitamin E | 8.6 mg/dL |
ii.) A drug interference study was conducted was performed according to CLSI EP07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline – Second Edition using 2 lots of SEKURE HbA1c reagent. All interferents were tested at $\%$ HbA1c concentrations of $\sim 6.5$ and $8.0\%$ in replicates of ten. Potential interferents were added individually to aliquots of a $\mathrm{K}_2$ EDTA venous whole blood specimen pool. A control portion of the same matrix was prepared and adjusted for volume with the same solvent used to prepare the interferent stock solution. Significant interference was defined by the sponsor as $>5\%$ deviation from the control (aliquot with no interfering substance). Results demonstrated that no significant interference was observed with the following substances up to the listed concentrations:
{13}
| Potential Drug Interferent | Highest Tested Concentration at which no significant interference was observed |
| --- | --- |
| Acarbose | 50 mg/dL |
| Acetaminophen | 20 mg/dL |
| Acetylsalicylate | 50.8 mg/dL |
| Atorvastatin | 600 μg Eq/L |
| Captopril | 0.5 mg/dL |
| Chlorpropamide | 74.7 mg/dL |
| Cyanate | 65 mg/dL |
| Furosemide | 6.0 mg/dL |
| Gemfibrozil | 7.5 mg/dL |
| Ibuprofen | 50 mg/dL |
| Insulin | 450 μU/mL |
| Losartan | 5 mg/dL |
| Metformin | 5.1 mg/dL |
| Nicotinic Acid | 61 mg/dL |
| Propranolol | 0.2 mg/dL |
| Repaglinide | 60 ng/mL |
iii.) A hemoglobin variant interference study was performed according to CLSI EP7-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline – Second Edition using K₂ EDTA venous whole blood samples known to contain common hemoglobin variants (HbA2, HbS, HbC, HbE, HbD, and HbF). The variant samples were obtained from several suppliers including NGSP, commercial vendors, and hospital sites. The %HbA1c concentration was measured using the SEKURE HbA1c assay on an SK500 analyzer and compared to results obtained with an FDA cleared and NGSP certified method that has been demonstrated to be free from interference by the respective hemoglobin variants (Architect c8000 for samples containing HbA2, HbC, HbD, and HbS, Trinity Premier Hb9210 for samples containing HbE and Tosoh Automated Glycohemoglobin Analyzer HLC-723 G8 for samples containing HbF). The numbers and concentrations of hemoglobin variants tested and the range of % HbA1c concentrations in which they were tested are shown below.
{14}
The sponsor's definition of non-significant interference was $\leq 5\%$ mean relative deviation between the SEKURE HbA1c Assay result and the NGSP comparator method.
| Hemoglobin Variant | | N | Range in % Abnormal Variant | Range in %HbA1c Concentration |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| e | HbA2 | 36 | 4.1 – 6.2 | 4.06 – 10.0 |
| s | HbC | 14 | 27.4 - 38.2 | 4.81 – 10.46 |
| u | | | | |
| l | HbD | 25 | 19.6 – 40.2 | 4.79 – 12.62 |
| t | HbE | 22 | 24.0 – 28.0 | 5.2 – 10.0 |
| s | | | | |
| o | HbS | 15 | 28.2 – 43.2 | 4.24 – 13.38 |
| f | HbF | 25 | 4.4 – 29.3 | 5.1 – 12.8 |
the hemoglobin variant study are summarized below:
| Hemoglobin Variant | Relative % Difference from Reference Concentration at Low and High Concentrations | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | ~6.0% HbA1c (5.5 to 6.5%HbA1c) | | ~9.0%HbA1c (7.5 to 10.5%HbA1c) | |
| | Relative % Difference | Range | Relative % Difference | Range |
| HbA2 | -2.28 | -5.56 to 5.08 | -1.28 | -2.30 to -0.14 |
| HbC | -1.60 | -3.30 to 1.90 | -1.39 | -2.28 to -0.38 |
| HbD | 0.10 | -5.69 to 2.91 | -1.14 | -2.83 to 0.67 |
| HbE | 3.41 | 1.85 to 5.42 | 3.5 | -0.50 to 6.34 |
| HbS | 2.28 | 0.51 to 2.40 | 0.16 | -0.94 to 1.73 |
| HbF | HbF interferes with this assay | | | |
The results demonstrate no significant interference observed for HbA2 $(\leq 6.2\%)$ , HbS $(\leq 43.2\%)$ , HbC $(\leq 38.2\%)$ , HbD $(\leq 40.2\%)$ , and HbE $(\leq 28.0\%)$ .
The device labeling contains the following prominent boxed warning in the package insert labeling:
"The SEKURE HbA1c assay has significant negative interference with fetal hemoglobin (HbF). HbA1c results are not valid for patients with elevated level of HbF, including those with known Hereditary Persistence of Fetal Hemoglobin."
{15}
iv. Hemoglobin Derivatives
A hemoglobin derivative study was performed using potential interferents tested at % HbA1c concentrations of ~ 6.5 and 8.0% in replicates of ten. Potential interferents were added individually to aliquots of a whole blood specimen pool. A control portion of the same matrix was prepared and adjusted for volume with the same solvent used to prepare the interferent stock solution. Significant interference was defined by the sponsor as >5% deviation from the control (aliquot with no interfering substance). Specificity was assessed by comparing test samples containing the potential interferents listed below to reference samples. Results demonstrated that no significant interference was observed with the following substances up to the listed concentrations:
| Potential Interferent | Highest Tested Concentration at which no significant interference (>5%) was observed |
| --- | --- |
| Glucose (Labile Hemoglobin) | 1000 mg/dL |
| Aspirin (Acetylated hemoglobin) | 50.8 mg/dL |
| Cyanate (Carbamylated Hemoglobin) | 65 mg/dL |
cut-off:
Not applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Method comparison testing was performed in accordance with CLSI EP09-A3, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline – Third Edition. One hundred and thirty (130) human whole blood and hemolysate samples in K₂EDTA with values spanning the assay range of 4.3 to 13.8% HbA1c were tested. Each sample was analyzed internally in replicates of two, using two lots each of SEKURE HbA1c reagent on two SK500 analyzers over 5 operating days. The candidate device results were compared to those obtained from testing at a secondary NGSP reference laboratory on the Tosoh G8 HPLC method. The method comparison was performed using both the hemolysate and whole blood application. The distribution of samples spanning the measuring interval for both whole blood and hemolysate methods are as follows:
{16}
Method Comparison Sample Range Summary
| Hemoglobin A1c level | Number of Samples | % of Samples Tested |
| --- | --- | --- |
| ≤ 5% | 6 | 4.6 |
| 5 – 6% | 11 | 8.5 |
| 6 – 6.5% | 34 | 26.2 |
| 6.5 – 7% | 33 | 25.4 |
| > 7% | 31 | 35.3 |
| Total samples | 130 | 100 |
Deming (weighted) and Passing-Bablok regression analyses were performed for the SEKURE HbA1c versus the comparator method. First replicate analysis for one representative reagent lot is summarized below:
## Summary of Method Comparison Results
Whole Blood
| | Slope | 95% CI | y-Intercept | 95% CI | R² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Deming | 0.987 | 0.975-0.999 | -0.087 | -0.182- 0.007 | 0.9977 |
| Passing-Bablok | 0.974 | 0.959-0.989 | 0.007 | -0.103-0.115 | 0.9977 |
Hemolysate
| | Slope | 95% CI | y-Intercept | 95% CI | R² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Deming | 0.984 | 0.973-0.995 | -0.012 | -0.099-0.074 | 0.9981 |
| Passing-Bablok | 0.969 | 0.955-0.982 | 0.101 | -0.008-0.202 | 0.9981 |
{17}
Scatter Plot using Deming Fit, %HbA1c, NGSP vs. SEKURE HbA1c Whole Blood

Scatter Plot using Passing-Bablok Fit, %HbA1c, NGSP vs. SEKURE HbA1c Whole Blood

{18}
Scatter Plot using Deming Fit, %HbA1c, NGSP vs. SEKURE HbA1c Hemolysate

Scatter Plot using Passing-Bablok Fit, %HbA1c, NGSP vs. SEKURE HbA1c Hemolysate

{19}
The following biases between SEKURE HbA1c versus the comparator method were observed:
Bias Estimation table (Passing Bablok)
| %HbA1c | Online (Whole Blood) | | Offline (Hemolysate) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Bias | % Bias | Bias | % Bias |
| 5.00 | -0.12 | -2.40 | -0.06 | -1.20 |
| 6.50 | -0.16 | -2.46 | -0.10 | -1.54 |
| 8.00 | -0.20 | -2.50 | -0.15 | -1.88 |
| 12.00 | -0.30 | -2.50 | -0.28 | -2.33 |
Bias Estimation table (Deming)
| %HbA1c | Online (Whole Blood) | | Offline (Hemolysate) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Bias | % Bias | Bias | % Bias |
| 5.00 | -0.15 | -3.04 | -0.09 | -1.84 |
| 6.50 | -0.17 | -2.64 | -0.12 | -1.78 |
| 8.00 | -0.19 | -2.39 | -0.14 | -1.75 |
| 12.00 | -0.24 | -2.03 | -0.20 | -1.70 |
# Total Error Near the Cutoff
Using the results of bias estimation (%Bias) in the method comparison study and precision estimates in the reproducibility study, the Total Error (TE) at the following concentrations (5%, 6.5%, 8% and 12%) was calculated as follows: $\% \mathrm{TE} = |\% \mathrm{Bias}| + 1.96 * \% \mathrm{CV} * (1 + \% \mathrm{Bias} / 100)$ . The results are presented in the tables below.
% Total Error Summary - Whole Blood (NGSP) Passing Bablok
| % A1c – Decision Level | % Bias | % CV | % TE |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.0 | -2.40 | 1.4 | 5.08 |
| 6.5 | -2.46 | 1.2 | 4.75 |
| 8.0 | -2.50 | 0.9 | 4.22 |
| 12.0 | -2.50 | 0.8 | 4.03 |
{20}
% Total Error Summary - Hemolysate (NGSP) Passing Bablok
| % A1c – Decision Level | % Bias | % CV | % TE |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.0 | -1.20 | 1.2 | 3.52 |
| 6.5 | -1.54 | 1.0 | 3.47 |
| 8.0 | -1.88 | 0.9 | 3.61 |
| 12.0 | -2.33 | 0.7 | 3.67 |
% Total Error Summary - Whole Blood (NGSP) Deming
| % A1c – Decision Level | % Bias | % CV | % TE |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.0 | -3.04 | 1.4 | 5.70 |
| 6.5 | -2.64 | 1.2 | 4.93 |
| 8.0 | -2.39 | 0.9 | 4.11 |
| 12.0 | -2.03 | 0.8 | 3.56 |
% Total Error Summary - Hemolysate (NGSP) Deming
| % A1c – Decision Level | % Bias | % CV | % TE |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.0 | -1.84 | 1.2 | 4.15 |
| 6.5 | -1.78 | 1.0 | 3.71 |
| 8.0 | -1.75 | 0.9 | 3.48 |
| 12.0 | -1.70 | 0.7 | 3.05 |
# b. Matrix comparison:
A matrix study was performed to determine the suitability of different anticoagulant collection tube types for use in the SEKURE HbA1c assay using two lots of SEKURE HbA1c reagents on two SK500 analyzers. Matched venous blood specimens were collected from 41 different donors in the control tube type $(\mathrm{K}_2$ EDTA) and in sodium fluoride/ $\mathrm{K}_2$ EDTA and $\mathrm{K}_3$ EDTA tube types. Each sample was tested in 2 replicates using two lots of HbA1c reagents. The sample range tested was $5.03 - 13.69\%$ HbA1c.
Passing Bablok regression analysis data for one representative lot is provided below.
| Sample Type | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | R2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| K3EDTA | 0.998 (0.984-1.012) | 0.062 (-0.025-0.167) | 0.9992 |
| Sodium Fluoride/K2EDTA | 0.995 (0.983-1.004) | -0.021 (-0.082-0.092) | 0.9994 |
{21}
The data support the use of the following blood collection tubes with the HbA1c assay:
- K₂ EDTA (control tube)
- Sodium Fluoride/ K₂ EDTA
- K₃ EDTA
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
HbA1c values above 6.5 %HbA1c (48 mmol/mol) meet the criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.⁴ Patients with HbA1c values in the range of 5.7 - 6.4 %HbA1c (39 - 47 mmol/mol) are at an increased risk for diabetes (pre-diabetes).⁴ HbA1c levels below 5.7 % HbA1c (39 mmol/mol) are considered normal.⁴
⁴ American Diabetes Association. Position Statement: Standards of medical care in diabetes – In: Diabetes Care 2018; 41 (Suppl 1): S13-S27.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Parts 801 and 809, as applicable and the special controls for this device type under 21 CFR 862.1373.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.