K172472 · STERIS Corporation · JOJ · Nov 17, 2017 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K172472
Device Name
Micro-MEC 1.8% Glutaraldehyde Monitor Strip
Applicant
STERIS Corporation
Product Code
JOJ · General Hospital
Decision Date
Nov 17, 2017
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 880.2800
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Micro-MEC 1.8% Glutaraldehyde Monitor Strip is a semi-quantitative chemical indicator for use in determining whether the concentration of glutaraldehyde, the active ingredient, is greater than the minimum effective concentration (MEC) of 1.8% glutaraldehyde established for Micro-Cide™ 28 High Level Disinfectant (Micro-Cide™ 28 HLD).
Device Story
Device is a single-use chemical indicator strip; consists of an indicator pad on a polymer substrate handle. Used to monitor glutaraldehyde concentration in Micro-Cide™ 28 HLD working solution. User dips strip into solution for 2 seconds; reads result at 120 seconds. Indicator pad changes color from yellow to purple if concentration >1.8%; remains yellow or patchy if ≤1.8%. Provides visual feedback to healthcare personnel regarding whether disinfectant solution requires replacement. Ensures solution efficacy for high-level disinfection; prevents use of sub-therapeutic germicide concentrations.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance studies confirmed ≥80% pass rate at 2.1% glutaraldehyde and 100% fail rate at 1.8% glutaraldehyde. Additional testing included specificity (tap water exposure), contaminant interference, chemical resistance, shelf-life stability, and blind user testing with inexperienced operators. All tests met pre-defined acceptance criteria.
Technological Characteristics
Chemical indicator strip; absorbent paper pad on polypropylene substrate. Principle: colorimetric sodium sulfite pH-based reaction. Color change: yellow to purple. Dimensions/form factor: strip. Shelf-life: 24 months unopened, 90 days opened. No energy source or software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use as a semi-quantitative chemical indicator to verify that the concentration of glutaraldehyde in Micro-Cide™ 28 HLD solution is above the minimum effective concentration (MEC) of 1.8%.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Biological sterilization process indicator: A device intended for use by a health care provider to accompany products being sterilized through a sterilization procedure and to monitor adequacy of sterilization. The device consists of a known number of microorganisms, of known resistance to the mode of sterilization, in or on a carrier and enclosed in a protective package. Subsequent growth or failure of the microorganisms to grow under suitable conditions indicates the adequacy of sterilization. Physical/chemical sterilization process indicator: A device intended for use by a health care provider to accompany products being sterilized through a sterilization procedure and to monitor one or more parameters of the sterilization process. The adequacy of the sterilization conditions as measured by these parameters is indicated by a visible change in the device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo in blue, with the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" stacked on top of "ADMINISTRATION".
November 17, 2017
STERIS Corporation Jennifer Nalepka Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist 5960 Heisley Road Mentor. Ohio 44060
Re: K172472
Trade/Device Name: Micro-MEC 1.8% Glutaraldehyde Monitor Strip Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.2800 Regulation Name: Sterilization Process Indicator Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JOJ Dated: August 30, 2017 Received: September 1, 2017
Dear Jennifer Nalepka:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Tara A. Ryan -S
for
Tina Kiang, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
### K172472
Device Name
Micro-MEC 1.8% Glutaraldehyde Monitor Strip
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Micro-MEC 1.8% Glutaraldehyde Monitor Strip is a semi-quantitative chemical indicator for use in determining whether the concentration of glutaraldehyde, the active ingredient in the solutions listed below, is greater than the minimum effective concentration (MEC) of 1.8% glutaraldehyde established for Micro-Cide™ 28 High Level Disinfectant (Micro-Cide™ 28 HLD)
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
] Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
X Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW *
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 06/30/2020 See PRA Statement below.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for STERIS. The logo consists of the word "STERIS" in large, bold, sans-serif font, with the registered trademark symbol to the right of the word. Below the word "STERIS" is a graphic of several horizontal, wavy lines in blue, resembling water waves.
# 510(k) Summary For Micro-MEC 1.8% Glutaraldehyde Monitor Strip
### Sponsor:
STERIS Corporation 5960 Heisley Road Mentor, OH 44060 Phone: (440) 354-2600 Fax No: (440) 357-9198
### Manufacturer:
Albert Browne, Ltd. Chancery House 190 Waterside Rd. Hamilton Industrial Park Leicester United Kingdom LE5 1QZ
Contact:
Jennifer Nalepka Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist Telephone: (440) 392-7458 Fax No: (440) 357-9198 E-mail: Jennifer_Nalepka@steris.com
Summary Date: November 15, 2017
Premarket Notification Number: K172472
STERIS Corporation ■ 5960 Heisley Road ■ Mentor, OH 44060-1834 USA ■ 440-354-2600
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### 1. Device Name
| Trade Name: | Micro-MEC 1.8% Glutaraldehyde Monitor Strip |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common/usual Name: | Chemical Indicator |
| Device Classification: | Class II |
| Classification Name: | Physical/chemical sterilization process indicator<br>(21 CFR 880.2800 (b), Product Code JOJ) |
#### 2. Predicate Device
| K012335 | MetriTest 1.8 Glutaraldehyde Concentration Monitor - the predicate is identical to the proposed device. |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### 3. Description of Device
The Micro-MEC 1.8% Glutaraldehyde Monitor Strip is a chemical indicator strip consisting of an indicator pad attached to a polymer substrate which serves as a handle. The test strip has been developed to monitor the concentration of glutaraldehyde in Micro-Cide" 28 HLD working solution. The indicator pad is impregnated with an indicator solution that changes color from vellow to purple if the concentration of the germicide exceeds the minimum effective concentration (MEC) of the solution.
The paper pad on an unused indicator strip is yellow in color. After an immersion time (dip time) of two seconds in a Micro-Cide™ 28 HLD solution, it is read at 120 seconds to verify the glutaraldehyde concentration of >1.8%. At 120 seconds the indicator strip will exhibit a stable uniform purple color if the concentration of glutaraldehyde is >2.1%. The strip will appear yellow or patchy yellow/purple if the solution has ≤1.8% glutaraldehyde, signaling to the customer that the solution must be replaced.
The glutaraldehyde concentration of the neat, unused Micro-Cide™ 28 HLD solution is 3%. To ensure an adequate margin of safety over the MEC of the germicide, the indicator was formulated to undergo a complete color change at glutaraldehyde concentrations of 2.1% in at least 80% of the tests conducted. The concentration of glutaraldehyde that will induce a color change is sufficiently higher than the MEC for the Micro-Cide " 28 HLD solution to ensure that the indicator (test strip) will not indicate a PASS in solutions with glutaraldehyde at or below the MEC of 1.8%. However, due to the kinetics of the chemical reaction that produces the color change, a test conducted on a Micro-Cide™ 28 HLD solution
{5}------------------------------------------------
with a glutaraldehyde concentration of 1.83-2.10% may indicate a PASS or a FAIL result.
The proposed test strip is used in the same way and performs the same as the predicate device to indicate the presence of the same glutaraldehyde concentration, >1.8%.
#### 4. Intended Use
The Micro-MEC 1.8% Glutaraldehyde Monitor Strip is a semi-quantitative chemical indicator for use in determining whether the concentration of glutaraldehyde, the active ingredient, is greater than the minimum effective concentration (MEC) of 1.8% glutaraldehyde established for Micro-Cide™ 28 High Level Disinfectant (Micro-Cide™ 28 HLD).
#### 5. Description of Safety and Substantial Equivalence
The proposed and predicate devices are single use chemical indicator strips that monitor the MEC of glutaraldehyde-containing germicide solutions.
Table 5-1 summarizes the comparison between the proposed device, Micro-MEC 1.8% Glutaraldehyde Monitor Strip, and the predicate.
| | Proposed K172472<br>Micro-MEC 1.8%<br>Glutaraldehyde Monitor<br>Strip | Predicate K012335<br>MetriTest 1.8<br>Glutaraldehyde<br>Concentration Monitor | Comparison |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended Use | The Micro-MEC 1.8%<br>Glutaraldehyde Monitor<br>Strip is a semi-<br>quantitative chemical<br>indicator for use in<br>determining whether the<br>concentration of<br>glutaraldehyde, the active<br>ingredient, is above or<br>below the minimum<br>effective concentration<br>(MEC) of 1.8%<br>glutaraldehyde<br>established for Micro-<br>Cide™ 28 High Level<br>Disinfectant (Micro-<br>Cide™ 28 HLD) | The MetriTest 1.8<br>Glutaraldehyde<br>Concentration Monitor is<br>a glutaraldehyde<br>concentration monitor for<br>use in glutaraldehyde-<br>containing germicide<br>solutions with an MEC of<br>1.8% glutaraldehyde.<br>The MetriTest 1.8<br>Glutaraldehyde<br>Concentration Monitor is<br>dedicated for use with<br>Metricide 28 and<br>Metricide Plus 30<br>Solutions. | Both indicators<br>monitor the<br>concentration<br>greater than 1.8%<br>glutaraldehyde<br>germicide. |
| Substrate | Absorbent Paper | Absorbent Paper | Same |
## Table 5-1. Technological Comparison to Predicate
{6}------------------------------------------------
# STERIS TRADITIONAL 510(k) PREMARKET NOTIFICATION Micro-MEC 1.8% Glutaraldehyde Monitor Strip
| Indicator /<br>reaction | Colorimetric sodium<br>sulfite pH-based reaction | Colorimetric sodium<br>sulfite pH-based reaction | Same |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Backing | Polypropylene | Polypropylene | Same |
| Color change | Yellow to purple | Yellow to purple | Same |
| Detection | Greater than 1.8%<br>glutaraldehyde | Greater than 1.8%<br>glutaraldehyde | Same |
| Viewing | Paper on front of strip | Paper on front of strip | Same |
| Shelf-life,<br>unopened | Current testing supports 8<br>months | 24 months | Target of 24 months<br>for proposed strip |
| Shelf-life.<br>opened | 90 days | 90 days | Same |
| Dip and<br>Read Times | Dip time = 2 second<br>Read time at 120 seconds | Dip time = 1 seconds<br>Read time at 60 seconds | Both dip and read<br>times optimized for<br>each glutaraldehyde<br>solution. |
Table 5-2 summarizes the verification activities that were performed, with their respective acceptance criteria and results, to demonstrate that the Micro-MEC 1.8% Glutaraldehyde Monitor Strip is substantially equivalent to the claimed predicate device when used according to its instructions for use. The product effectively determines whether or not the concentration of the use solution of Micro-Cide 28 HLD solution is greater than 1.8% glutaraldehyde. These studies confirm that the device's performance meets the requirements of its pre-defined acceptance criteria and intended use.
| Table 5-2 Performance Test Summary | |
|------------------------------------|--|
|------------------------------------|--|
| Test | Acceptance Criteria | Result |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Performance | • Minimum 80% pass results when tested with 2.1%<br>glutaraldehyde Micro-Cide™ 28 HLD solution<br>• 100% fail results with 1.8% glutaraldehyde Micro-Cide™<br>28 HLD solution | Pass |
| Specificity | Incomplete color change when exposed to tap water only | Pass |
| Contaminants | Meets performance specifications in the presence of<br>organic and inorganic contaminants in the test solution | Pass |
| Exposure to aggressive<br>chemicals | Meets performance specifications after exposure to<br>aggressive chemicals. | Pass |
| Blind study testing | Meets performance specifications with inexperienced users | Pass |
| Shelf life | Meets performance specifications at each time point after<br>storage in different environments | Pass |
| In-use (open bottle) | Meets performance specifications at each time point after<br>storage in different environments | Pass |
| Functional stability | Meets performance specifications at each time point after<br>storage outside bottle | Pass |
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### 6. Conclusion
The Micro-MEC 1.8% Glutaraldehyde Monitor Strip intended for use with Micro-Cide™ 28 HLD solution is substantially equivalent to the predicate device, MetriTest 1.8 Glutaraldehyde Concentration Monitor. Based on the nonclinical tests performed the subject device is as safe, as effective and performs at least as well as the legally marketed predicate device, K012335, MetriTest 1.8 Glutaraldehyde Concentration Monitor (21 CFR 880.2800 (b), Product code JOJ).
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.