K172388 · Advanced Circulatory System, A Wholly Owned Subsidiary OF · BWF · Dec 22, 2017 · Anesthesiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K172388
Device Name
VPOD ITPR
Applicant
Advanced Circulatory System, A Wholly Owned Subsidiary OF
Product Code
BWF · Anesthesiology
Decision Date
Dec 22, 2017
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 868.5690
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The VPOD™ Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator is indicated for the temporary decrease in intrathoracic pressure to increase blood circulation, as prescribed by a physician, licensed practitioner, or qualified technician. Recommended duration of use is up to four hours.
Device Story
VPOD™ Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator (ITPR) provides temporary decrease in intrathoracic pressure to increase venous return and cardiac preload; used in patients with severe hypotension requiring assisted ventilation. Device consists of microprocessor-controlled motor and blower; connects to patient airway (endotracheal tube, mask) and mechanical ventilator/resuscitator. Unlike predicate requiring external wall vacuum, VPOD generates vacuum via internal impeller. Clinician sets negative pressure (-2 to -12 cmH2O) via GUI; device monitors airway pressure and blower status. During expiratory phase, blower creates negative pressure; during inspiratory phase, device allows gas flow. Integrated sensors and alarms monitor performance; system shuts down if pressure exceeds -9 mmHg. Used in hospital or pre-hospital settings by clinicians. Benefits include improved mean arterial pressure without interfering with ventilator exhaled volume monitoring, unlike predicate which requires silencing ventilator alarms.
Clinical Evidence
Animal study compared VPOD to predicate CirQlator. Both devices demonstrated equivalent performance in improving mean arterial pressure (17 mmHg increase at 30 minutes) and achieving negative expiratory airway pressure of approximately -9 mmHg (-12 cmH2O). No significant difference in positive airway pressures observed. Bench testing verified electrical safety (AAMI ANSI ES 60601-1), EMC (IEC 60601-1-2), alarm functionality (IEC 60601-1-8), and ventilator compatibility (ISO 80601-2-12). Biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993 confirmed materials are non-cytotoxic, non-irritating, and non-mutagenic.
Technological Characteristics
Microprocessor-controlled blower with magnetically coupled motor. Adjustable negative pressure range: -2 to -12 cmH2O. Interfaces with standard airway devices and ventilators. Includes three high-stability airway pressure sensors. Battery-powered with GUI. Biocompatibility: Externally communicating, tissue, limited duration (<24 hours) per ISO 10993-1. Standards: AAMI ANSI ES 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-1-8, ISO 80601-2-12, UL 2054.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring assisted ventilation who suffer from poor circulation, low blood pressure, or insufficient cardiac preload. Contraindicated for persons with pneumothorax, hemothorax, hypertension, or uncontrolled hemorrhage.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An incentive spirometer is a device that indicates a patient's breathing volume or flow and that provides an incentive to the patient to improve his or her ventilation.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
December 22, 2017
Advanced Circulatory System, a wholly owned subsidiary of ZOLL Paul Dryden Manager, Regulatory consultant for Advanced Circulatory System, a wholly owned subsidiary of ZOLL c/o ProMedic, LLC 131 Bay Point Dr. NE St. Petersburg, Florida 33704
Re: K172388
Trade/Device Name: VPOD™ Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator Regulation Number: 21 CFR 868.5690 Regulation Name: Incentive Spirometer Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: BWF Dated: August 6. 2017 Received: August 8, 2017
Dear Paul Dryden:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Tina Kiang -
s
Tina Kiang, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
#### K172388
#### Device Name
### VPOD™ Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator
Indications for Use (Describe)
The VPOD™ Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator is indicated for the temporary decrease in intrathoracic pressure to increase blood circulation, as prescribed by a physician, licensed practitioner, or qualified technician.
Recommended duration of use is up to four hours.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
XX Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
# *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (8/14)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) Summary Page 1 of 7 22-Dec-17
| Company: | Advanced Circulatory System<br>a wholly owned subsidiary of ZOLL<br>1905 County Rd C West<br>Roseville, MN 55113 |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Official Contact: | Anja Metzger, PhD<br>VP, Research and Development and Grant Affairs<br>Tel - 651.226.1626 |
| Proprietary or Trade Name: | VPOD™ Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator |
| Common/Usual Name: | Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator |
| Classification Name: | 21 CFR 868.5690<br>Procode – BWF<br>Incentive spirometer<br>Class II |
| Predicate Device: | K070490 – ACS CirQlator™ |
#### Device Description:
Advanced Circulatory Systems ("ACS") which is now part of Zoll, received clearance for the CirQlator™ Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator in 2007 under K070490. This device was developed to increase the return of venous blood back to the heart for treatment of a number of different clinical conditions associated with severe hypotension.
The predicate CirQlator Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator (ITPR) is used in combination with a positive pressure source such as a separate ventilator or manual resuscitation bag and an external vacuum source.
The proposed VPOD Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator (ITPR) is also intended to be used with patients who would benefit from increased venous return back to the heart for treatment of a number of different clinical conditions associated with severe hypotension but generates its own vacuum via the VPOD Motor and connects with a positive pressure source such as a separate ventilator or manual resuscitator bag.
#### Indications for Use:
The VPOD™ Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator is indicated for the temporary decrease in intrathoracic pressure to increase blood circulation, as prescribed by a physician, licensed practitioner, or qualified technician. Recommended duration of use is up to four hours.
#### Contraindications:
- persons with pneumothorax
- · persons with hemothorax
- · persons with hypertension
- · persons with uncontrolled hemorrhage
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary Page 2 of 7
22-Dec-17
# Predicate Device Comparison
| Table 1 – High Level Features and Differences<br>C | | |
|----------------------------------------------------|--|--|
|----------------------------------------------------|--|--|
| | Predicate<br>CirQlator | Proposed<br>VPOD ITPR |
|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Vacuum source | External | Integrated - generated by VPOD<br>Motor |
| Connects to separate<br>positive pressure source | Yes | Yes |
| Fixed negative pressure | Yes<br>-12 cmH2O | Adjustable<br>-2 to -12 cmH2O |
| | | | | Table 2 - Comparison of Similarities |
|--|--|--|--|--------------------------------------|
|--|--|--|--|--------------------------------------|
| Features | Predicate<br>K070490 - CirQlator ™ | Proposed<br>VPOD™ ITPR |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Indications for use | The CirQlator™ Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator<br>is indicated for the temporary decrease in<br>intrathoracic pressure to increase blood<br>circulation and blood pressure, as prescribed by a<br>physician, licensed practitioner, or qualified<br>technician. Recommended duration of use is up to<br>four hours. | The VPOD™ Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator is<br>indicated for the temporary decrease in<br>intrathoracic pressure to increase blood<br>circulation, as prescribed by a physician, licensed<br>practitioner, or qualified technician.<br>Recommended duration of use is up to four<br>hours. |
| Environment of Use | Hospital, Pre-Hospital (EMS) | Same |
| Patient Population | Patients needing assisted ventilation that suffer<br>from states of poor circulation, low blood<br>pressure, or insufficient cardiac preload that may<br>be reflected by low blood pressure. | Same |
| Contraindications | persons with pneumothorax<br>persons with hemothorax<br>persons with hypertension<br>persons with uncontrolled hemorrhage | Same |
| Interfaces | Airway (Endotracheal tube, Combitube,<br>facemask, laryngeal mask airway) | Same |
| | Positive Pressure source (Manual resuscitator,<br>anesthesia machine, ventilator) | Same |
| | Vacuum source - external | No external vacuum source required; vacuum<br>created by spinning impeller inside VPOD<br>Blower. |
| Design | When connected to a vacuum source, this positive<br>pressure breath results in mechanical movement<br>of piston to allow patient to be ventilated,<br>shutting off flow of vacuum. In between positive<br>pressure breaths, vacuum path open which creates<br>the negative intrathoracic pressure during the<br>expiratory phase of ventilation | VPOD Motor and Blower generate a vacuum.<br>The Motor is magnetically coupled to the Blower.<br>The Blower contains an impeller that when spun,<br>creates a vacuum. In between the positive<br>pressure breaths, the vacuum creates the negative<br>intrathoracic pressure during the expiratory phase<br>of ventilation |
{5}------------------------------------------------
| | 510(k) Summary<br>Page 3 of 7<br>22-Dec-17 | |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Safety Valve | Silicone valve acts as a safety valve to ensure<br>negative pressure does not exceed -9 mmHg | No external valving mechanism required.<br>Microprocessor controlled blower continuously<br>varies the negative intrathoracic pressure from -<br>0.5 to -9 mmHg (-2 to -12 cmH2O). This pressure<br>is continuously monitored by microprocessor and<br>the pressure sensors in the Motor. Any out of<br>range performance (greater than -9 mmHg) will<br>cause the Motor to shut down resulting in the<br>discontinuation of the negative pressure. When<br>blower is not spinning (In Standby Mode), there<br>is no effect on airway pressure. |
| Safety Feature | Patient can breathe through device while device<br>is attached to mask or endotracheal tube | Same |
| Vacuum level | Same for safety valve on device. Vacuum is<br>primarily regulated by commercially available<br>regulator placed at vacuum source | VPOD employs a miniature microprocessor<br>controlled and monitored blower. Within the<br>VPOD blower, three high-stability airway<br>pressure sensors monitor ventilator and patient<br>pressures, and each other, to ensure that the speed<br>of the blower and the resultant pressure are within<br>safety limits and that the single patient use blower<br>and the motor are within safe temperature limits.<br>Multiple alarm conditions (see hazards analysis<br>table) will cause the blower to stop spinning and<br>allowing breathing gasses to pass freely. |
| Patient status | Requires assisted ventilation | Requires assisted ventilation |
| Features | Predicate<br>K070490 - CirQlatorTM | Proposed<br>VPODTM ITPR |
|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Biocompatibility | Externally communicating<br>Tissue<br>Prolonged duration of use (>24 hours, <30 days) | Externally communicating<br>Tissue<br>Prolonged duration of use (>24 hours, <30 days) |
# Table 3 – Description of the Differences
| Features | Predicate<br>K070490 - CirQlator™ | Proposed<br>VPOD™ ITPR |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Vacuum source to<br>create negative<br>intrathoracic<br>pressure | External vacuum source | Microprocessor controlled and monitored<br>miniature blower |
| Design | Vacuum port for external vacuum | Does not require external vacuum source.<br>Vacuum controlled by software from Graphic<br>User Interface (GUI) with alarms and battery<br>backed power supply. |
| Maximum level of<br>negative pressure<br>applied to airway | -9 mmHg (-12 cmH2O) Fixed | -9 mmHg (-12 cmH2O) Maximum and<br>continuously variable as set by user from -2 to -<br>12 cmH2O. |
| Software driven | No | Yes |
| Operating conditions | 0°C to 40°C 30% to 85% RH | 10°C to 35°C 30% to 95% RH |
| Storage conditions | -20°C to 60°C 10% to 90% RH | -20°C to 50°C 10% to 90% RH |
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) Summary Page 4 of 7 22-Dec-17
#### Substantial Equivalence Discussion
The VPOD ITPR is viewed as substantially equivalent to the predicate device because:
#### Indications –
- . The VPOD ITPR is indicated for the temporary decrease in intrathoracic pressure to increase blood circulation and blood pressure, as prescribed by a physician, licensed practitioner, or qualified technician. Recommended duration of use is up to four hours.
- This is similar to the predicate - ACSI CirQlator™ - K070490.
#### Discussion -
There are no differences between the indications for use for the subject device and the predicate (K070490).
#### General Notes -
The VPOD™ Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator may benefit people needing assisted ventilation that suffer from states of poor circulation, low blood pressure, or insufficient cardiac preload that may be reflected by low blood pressure. The device is not intended for those patients who would not benefit from an increase in cardiac preload.
Routine monitoring (e.g., heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation), and appropriate sedation that may include neuromuscular blockade, is required for use.
#### Patient Population -
- . The patient population is those patient needing assisted ventilation that suffer from states of poor circulation, low blood pressure, or insufficient cardiac preload that may be reflected by low blood pressure.
- This is similar to the predicate ACSI CirOlator™ K070490. .
#### Discussion -
There are no differences in the patient population for the subject device and the predicate (K070490).
#### Environment of Use -
● It is intended for pre-hospital (including EMS) and hospital use.
#### Discussion -
There are no differences in environment of use.
#### Technology -
- The principle of operation, namely applying a negative pressure to increase intrathoracic ● pressure is the same as the predicate.
- . The subject device has its own means of generating a vacuum, the motor and blower, whereas the predicate must be connected to an external vacuum source.
- o As discussed above the difference of how vacuum is provided based upon our risk assessment and testing does not raise new concerns of safety or effectiveness.
- . The ability to adjust the amount of negative pressure in the subject device vs. a fixed vacuum negative of the predicate allows the clinician more latitude in using the subject device on patients. Some patients may not tolerate the higher negative pressure initially and require a gradual increase to the maximum of -12 cmH2O.
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) Summary Page 5 of 7 22-Dec-17
#### Discussion -
The differences as discuss below do not raise new concerns of safety and performance when compared to the predicate and tested.
#### Non-clinical Testing
#### Biocompatibility of Materials -
- The materials are considered Externally Communicating, Tissue, Limited durations (<24 ● hours) per ISO 10993-1
- Testing included .
- o Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5)
- o Sensitization (ISO 10993-10)
- Irritation (ISO 10993-10) O
- Acute Systemic Toxicity (ISO 10993-11) o
- Gas emission VOC with risk based assessment o
- Particulate Matter (PM2.5) O
- Discussion -
The materials used in the subject device were tested and found to be non-cytotoxic, nonirritating, non-mutagenic, and with a margin of safety > 1.
#### Bench Performance
Device performance testing included:
| Cleaning, Shelf-life, Effects<br>of Aging | Validation and Verification of<br>VPOD Motor<br>Effects of aging |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Electrical Safety, EMC | AAMI ANSI ES 60601-1<br>IEC 60601-1-2 |
| Alarms | IEC 60601-1-8 |
| Applicable requirements of<br>ventilators | ISO 80601-2-12<br>Applicable requirements |
| Bench | Accuracy – airway pressure<br>Flow rates<br>Vacuum accuracy<br>Simulated altitude<br>Resistance to flow<br>Compatibility with ventilator<br>Pressure / flow<br>Mechanical drop<br>Dead space<br>Leakage of blower<br>Induced temperature rise / change |
| Batteries | UL 2054 |
| Usability | |
{8}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) Summary Page 6 of 7 22-Dec-17
#### Comparative Performance
We have performed comparative performance testing: see the specific sections for full details. These tested included:
#### Animal Study
We performed an animal study comparing the subject device to the predicate. The results showed:
#### Improved Mean Arterial Pressure
Both the VPOD and the CirQlator improved mean arterial pressure by 17 mmHg (after bleed and recovery) at minute 30 of device use.
#### Maximum airway pressure
VPOD and CirQlator are initiated (turned on) after the 0 minute data is collected during inspiration by the ventilator throughout the study. The results showed no significant difference between the positive airway pressures of the CirOlator and the VPOD during device use.
#### Maximum negative airway pressure
There are no significant differences between the negative airway pressures achieved with either device demonstrating their substantial equivalence. Both devices achieved a negative expiratory airway pressure of approximately -9 mmHg (-12 cmH2O).
#### Conclusion
Both devices are able to create equivalent negative airway pressures during the expiratory phase and improve circulation comparably when utilized in this model of compromised circulation.
These studies demonstrate the substantial equivalence of the VPOD to the CirQlator.
#### Discussion of Differences
The major differences between the proposed device and the predicate are:
The proposed device (VPOD) employs a miniature blower connected to the patient's airway (tracheal tube, etc.) and in series with the mechanical ventilator connection (WYE piece) which allows the patient to receive breaths through the blower. When the blower is not spinning and the VPOD is placed in the breathing circuit, it serves to freely pass breathing gas to-and-fro. When active, VPOD spins up to the user defined pressure setting and while still allowing the patient to receive breaths to-and-fro, it imparts a constant, regulated difference in pressure between the patient and the ventilator. The CirQlator is a mechanical device that relies upon regulated external vacuum (wall vacuum) in concert with a pressure driven valve to cycle between inspiration and exhalation. Inspiration cycling is driven by the positive pressure ventilation source. An integral regulator valve ensures that the maximum vacuum (-12 cmH2O) is not exceeded.
VPOD allows exhaled gas to return through the mechanical ventilator's exhalation system. Sophisticated mechanical ventilators monitor and alarm based on measured exhaled volume from the patient. The VPOD does not perturb exhaled volume, or other ventilator monitors. The predicate CirQlator directs exhaled gas from the patient to wall suction, thereby causing the
{9}------------------------------------------------
mechanical ventilator low exhaled tidal and minute volume alarms to activate. Hence, the predicate requires that the mechanical ventilator's exhaled alarms be silenced or disabled during its use. Consequently, a clinician must constantly attend the patient during the use of the predicate to ensure that the patient is receiving adequate ventilation and that the breathing circuit connections are secure.
VPOD allows the user to adjust the vacuum level, whereas CirQlator was a fixed vacuum level of -12 cmH2O expiratory airway pressure. In VPOD, the user can adjust the expiratory airway pressure in increments of -1 cmH2O from -2 to -12 cmH2O.
It is our view that the only significant difference that affects the safety or effectiveness of the intended device as compared to the predicate device is the integration of its microprocessor controlled vacuum source, patient and device monitors and alarms. The effect on intrathoracic pressure regulation is the same as CirQlator, but the proposed device does not perturb the performance of sophisticated mechanical ventilators and provides self-checking and monitoring features by virtue of the microprocessor based control system and graphic user interface.
### Substantial Equivalence Conclusion
Based upon the performance testing and comparison to the legally marketed predicate device for indications for use, technology, and performance we believe we have demonstrated that the VPOD ITPR is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.