Patient samples were used to perform method comparison testing against an NGSP reference method to establish substantial equivalence and validate assay performance across the clinical measuring range.
Bias estimation, slope, y-intercept, and correlation (r)
Indications for Use
The ADVIA® Chemistry Enzymatic Hemoglobin A1c (A1c E) assay is an in vitro diagnostic assay for the quantitative determination of mmol/mol HbA1c (IFCC) and % HbA1c (DCCT/NGSP) in human anticoagulated venous whole blood and hemolysate for use on the ADVIA® Chemistry systems. Measurement of Hemoglobin A1c is used as an aid in the diagnosis and monitoring of long-term blood glucose control in patients with diabetes mellitus, and as an aid in the identification of patients at risk for developing diabetes mellitus.
Device Story
Enzymatic assay for quantitative HbA1c measurement on ADVIA Chemistry 1800 systems; utilizes venous whole blood or hemolysate. Procedure involves two-step enzymatic reaction: 1) Protease cleaves N-terminal fructosyl dipeptides from hemoglobin beta-chain; 2) Fructosyl peptide oxidase (FPOX) generates hydrogen peroxide, reacting with chromogen for colorimetric measurement at 658/805 nm. Total hemoglobin measured at 478/805 nm; turbidity normalization at 884 nm. Used in clinical laboratories by technicians. Results aid clinicians in assessing long-term glycemic control and diabetes risk. Not for use in patients with specific hemoglobin variants or conditions affecting erythrocyte lifespan.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated per CLSI EP05-A3 (n=720 results/sample). Linearity per CLSI EP06-A (range 3.8-14.0% HbA1c). Method comparison (n=163) against Tosoh G8 HPLC showed R²=0.99-1.00. Interference testing per CLSI EP07-A2 confirmed no significant interference from common endogenous/exogenous substances, though significant interference exists with HbF.
Technological Characteristics
Quantitative enzymatic assay; liquid, ready-to-use reagents (R1, R2, Pretreatment). Compatible with ADVIA Chemistry systems (e.g., ADVIA 1800). Supports automated on-system lysis or manual hemolysate preparation. Standardized to IFCC reference calibrators; NGSP certified. Measures HbA1c in human anticoagulated venous whole blood (EDTA, Lithium Heparin, Sodium Fluoride/Disodium EDTA).
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative determination of HbA1c in human anticoagulated venous whole blood/hemolysate to aid in diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes mellitus and identification of patients at risk for diabetes. Contraindicated for patients with abnormal fetal hemoglobin (HbF), hemoglobinopathies (except sickle cell trait), abnormal red blood cell turnover (hemolysis, iron deficiency), malignancies, or severe chronic hepatic/renal disease. Not for use in diagnosing diabetes during pregnancy.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hemoglobin A1c test system is a device used to measure the percentage concentration of hemoglobin A1c in blood. Measurement of hemoglobin A1c is used as an aid in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and as an aid in the identification of patients at risk for developing diabetes mellitus.
Special Controls
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). Hemoglobin A1c test systems must comply with the following special controls: 1) The device must have initial and annual standardization verification by a certifying glycohemoglobin standardization organization deemed acceptable by FDA. 2) The premarket notification submission must include performance testing to evaluate precision, accuracy, linearity and interference, including the following: i) Performance testing of device precision must, at a minimum, use blood samples with concentrations near 5.0%, 6.5%, 8.0% and 12% hemoglobin A1c. This testing must evaluate precision over a minimum of 20 days using at least 3 lots of the device and 3 instruments, as applicable. ii) Performance testing of device accuracy must include a minimum of 120 blood samples that span the measuring interval of the new device and compare results of the new device to results of the standardized test method. Results must demonstrate little or no bias versus the standardized method. iii) Total error of the new device must be evaluated using single measurements by the new device compared to results of the standardized test method, and this evaluation must demonstrate a total error less than or equal to 6%. iv) Performance testing must demonstrate that there is little to no interference from common hemoglobin variants, including Hemoglobin C, Hemoglobin D, Hemoglobin E, Hemoglobin A2 and Hemoglobin S. 3) When assay interference from Hemoglobin F or interference with other hemoglobin variants with low frequency in the population is observed, a warning statement must be placed in a black box and must appear in all labeling material for these devices describing the interference and any affected populations.
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) The device must have initial and annual standardization verification by a certifying glycohemoglobin standardization organization deemed acceptable by FDA.
(2) The premarket notification submission must include performance testing to evaluate precision, accuracy, linearity, and interference, including the following:
(i) Performance testing of device precision must, at a minimum, use blood samples with concentrations near 5.0 percent, 6.5 percent, 8.0 percent, and 12 percent hemoglobin A1c. This testing must evaluate precision over a minimum of 20 days using at least three lots of the device and three instruments, as applicable.
(ii) Performance testing of device accuracy must include a minimum of 120 blood samples that span the measuring interval of the device and compare results of the new device to results of a standardized test method. Results must demonstrate little or no bias versus the standardized method.
(iii) Total error of the new device must be evaluated using single measurements by the new device compared to results of the standardized test method, and this evaluation must demonstrate a total error less than or equal to 6 percent.
(iv) Performance testing must demonstrate that there is little to no interference from common hemoglobin variants, including Hemoglobin C, Hemoglobin D, Hemoglobin E, Hemoglobin A2, and Hemoglobin S.
(3) When assay interference from Hemoglobin F or interference with other hemoglobin variants with low frequency in the population is observed, a warning statement must be placed in a black box and must appear in all labeling material for these devices describing the interference and any affected populations.
Predicate Devices
Abbott Architect Hemoglobin A1c (k130255)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k171771
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, enzymatic
E. Applicant:
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
ADVIA Chemistry Enzymatic Hemoglobin A1c (A1c_E) Assay
G. Regulatory Information:
| Regulation Description | Product Code | Device Class | Regulation | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hemoglobin A1c Test System | PDJ | II | 21 CFR 862.1373 | Chemistry, 75 |
| Glycosylated Hemoglobin Assay | LCP | II | 21 CFR 864.7470 | Hematology, 81 |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for use below.
{1}
2. Indication(s) for use:
The ADVIA Chemistry Enzymatic Hemoglobin A1c (A1c_E) assay is an in vitro diagnostic assay for the quantitative determination of mmol/mol HbA1c (IFCC) and % HbA1c (DCCT/NGSP) in human anticoagulated venous whole blood and hemolysate for use on the ADVIA Chemistry systems. Measurement of Hemoglobin A1c is used as an aid in the diagnosis and monitoring of long-term blood glucose control in patients with diabetes mellitus, and as an aid in the identification of patients at risk for developing diabetes mellitus.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
For in vitro diagnostic use.
The ADVIA Chemistry A1c_E assay has significant interference with fetal hemoglobin (HbF). Samples containing HbF may produce negative bias (lower than actual results) with the ADVIA Chemistry A1c_E assay. Hemoglobin A1c results are invalid for patients with abnormal amounts of HbF, including those with known Hereditary Persistence of Fetal Hemoglobin.
Patients with hemoglobin concentrations outside of the acceptable range for the ADVIA Chemistry A1c_E assay should be assayed by a test employing a different assay principle.
Any cause of shortened red blood cell survival (for example, hemolytic anemia or other hemolytic diseases, pregnancy, or recent significant blood loss) will reduce exposure of red blood cells to glucose with a consequent decrease in HbA1c values. HbA1c results are not reliable in patients with chronic blood loss and consequent variable erythrocyte life span.
Fetal Hemoglobin (HbF) consists of 2 alpha and 2 gamma chains that are not recognized by FPOX enzyme which measures N-terminal fructosyl dipeptides on the beta-chain (refer to Principles of the Procedure). Samples that contain high amounts of HbF, usually found in some people with thalassemia, in infants, and in some pregnant women, may yield a lower than expected HbA1c result with this assay.
The Hemoglobin A1c assay should not be used to diagnose diabetes during pregnancy. Hemoglobin A1c reflects the average blood glucose levels over the preceding 3 months (i.e., the average life span of a red blood cell) and therefore may be falsely low during pregnancy or any other condition associated with recent onset of hyperglycemia and/or decreased red blood cell survival.
The Hemoglobin A1c assay should not be used to diagnose or monitor diabetes in patients with the following conditions: hemoglobinopathies except as demonstrated to
2
{2}
produce acceptable performance (e.g., sickle cell trait), abnormal red blood cell turnover (e.g., anemias from hemolysis and iron deficiency), malignancies, and severe chronic hepatic and renal disease.
In cases of rapidly evolving Type 1 diabetes, the increase of HbA1c values might be delayed compared to the acute increase in glucose concentrations. In these conditions, diabetes mellitus must be diagnosed based on plasma glucose concentrations and/or the typical clinical symptoms.
This test should not replace glucose testing for patients with Type 1 diabetes, pediatric patients or pregnant women.
Do not use sodium fluoride/potassium oxalate collection tubes as they may interfere with the results of the ADVIA Chemistry A1c_E assay.
## 4. Special instrument requirements:
ADVIA Chemistry 1800 System
## I. Device Description:
### Assay
The ADVIA Chemistry Enzymatic Hemoglobin A1c (A1c_E) assay measures hemoglobin A1c in human anticoagulated venous whole blood and hemolysate. The assay consists of three reagents (R1, R2, and Pretreatment). These reagents are liquid and are ready to use.
| Reagent | Reactive Ingredients |
| --- | --- |
| Reagent 1 | 10-Carboxymethylaminocarbonyl)-3,7-bis(dimethylamino)-phenothiazine sodium salt |
| | Protease (Bacterial) |
| Reagent 2 | Peroxidase (Horseradish) |
| | Fructosyl peptide oxidase (E. coli, recombinant) |
| Pretreatment | Sodium nitrite |
Inactive ingredients: Reagent 1 contains sodium azide as a stabilizer and preservative. Reagent 1 and pretreatment contain Proclin 300 as a preservative. Reagent 2 contains ofloxacin as a preservative.
The assay offers both an automated and a manual application. The automated application (A1c_E) lyses the anticoagulated whole blood specimen on the system for the automated application (A1c_E). Samples may also be lysed manually using the ADVIA® Chemistry A1c_E pretreatment solution to obtain hemolysate for the manual
{3}
application (A1c_EM).
## Calibrator
The Enzymatic Hemoglobin A1c (A1c_E) Calibrators are available separately and consists of two levels of hemoglobin A1c and one blanking solution.
The value-assigned A1c Calibrator values are approximately the following hemoglobin A1c values:
Level 1: ~5% HbA1c
Level 2: ~11.5% HbA1c
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Abbott Architect Hemoglobin A1c
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k130255
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | Intended for the the quantitative determination of mmol/mol HbA1c (IFCC) and % HbA1c (DCCT/NGSP) as an aid in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, as an aid to identify patients who may be at risk for developing diabetes mellitus, and for the monitoring of longterm blood glucose control in individuals with diabetes mellitus. | Same |
| Platform | ADVIA 1800 Clinical Chemistry System | ARCHITECT c 8000 System (clinical chemistry analyzer) |
| Methodology | Quantitative, enzymatic | Same |
| Specimen Type | Venous whole blood and hemolysate:
• Dipotassium EDTA
• Lithium Heparin
• Sodium Fluoride/Disodium EDTA | Venous whole blood and hemolysate:
• Dipotassium EDTA
• Lithium Heparin
• Sodium Fluoride/Disodium |
{4}
| Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | • Tripotassium EDTA | EDTA
• Tripotassium EDTA
• Sodium Heparin |
| Measuring Range | 3.8 to 14.0% HbA1c (DCCT/NGSP)
18.03 -129.50 mmol/mol HbA1c (IFCC) | 4.0 to 14.0% HbA1c (DCCT/NGSP)
20.22-129.51 mmol/mol HbA1c (IFCC) |
| Reporting Units | % HbA1c NGSP/DCCT and mmol/mol IFCC | Same |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP05-A3: Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Third Edition
CLSI EP06-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP07-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline – Second Edition
CLSI EP09-A3: Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline – Third Edition
CLSI EP17-A2: Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Second Edition
CLSI EP25-A: Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP28-A3c: Defining, Establishing, and Verifying. Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline—Third Edition
## L. Test Principle:
The ADVIA Chemistry hemoglobin A1c assay consists of two separate measurements: glycated hemoglobin (A1c_E) and total hemoglobin (tHb_E). The two measurements are used to determine the percent HbA1c (NGSP units) or the hemoglobin A1c_E/tHb_E ratio in mmol/mol (IFCC units). The individual concentration values of A1c_E and tHb_E generated by this assay are used only for calculating the %HbA1c or A1c_E/tHb_E ratio, and must not be used individually for diagnostic purposes.
{5}
The anticoagulated whole blood specimen is lysed on the system for the automated ADVIA Chemistry A1c_E assay or may be lysed manually using the ADVIA Chemistry A1c_E pretreatment solution to obtain hemolysate for manual ADVIA Chemistry A1c_E (A1c_EM) assay.
The ADVIA Chemistry A1c_E assay is an enzymatic method that specifically measures N-terminal fructosyl dipeptides on the beta-chain of HbA1c. In the pretreatment step, the erythrocytes are lysed and the hemoglobin is oxidized to methemoglobin by reaction with sodium nitrite. In the first step of the reaction (the ADVIA Chemistry A1c_E reagent 1 (R1)+ sample), the N-terminal fructosyl dipeptide fragment is cleaved from the hemoglobin beta chain with a protease. Concurrently, methemoglobin is converted into stable azide-methemoglobin in the presence of sodium azide and the total hemoglobin concentration is determined by measuring the absorbance at 478/805 nm. In the second step of the reaction, fructosyl peptide oxidase (FPOX) is added to react with the fructosyl dipeptide to generate hydrogen peroxide. The hydrogen peroxide reacts with the chromagen in the presence of peroxidase to develop a color that is measured at 658/805 nm.
The ADVIA Chemistry A1c_E assay incorporates a turbidity normalization mechanism (cHb_E) that is measured at 884 nm to remove the effect of any sample turbidity which could impact the tHb_E measurement.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Testing was performed with both the automated pretreated and manual pretreated samples and two calibrations were performed per each method (automated and manual) over the duration of the study. Data were analyzed consistent with CLSI document EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods. Samples were run in duplicate in 2 runs per day on 3 ADVIA 1800 instruments for 20 days. Testing was performed using 3 lots of reagents per instrument for a total of 720 results per sample. The pooled data from the study is shown in the tables below.
Samples consisted of two commercial quality controls (BioRad QC) and four whole blood patient pools with target values of 5.0% HbA1c, 6.5% HbA1c, 8.0% HbA1c, and 12.0% HbA1c. The manual and automated methods were assessed and are summarized below:
{6}
# Automated Pretreatment
NGSP: ADVIA 1800 Automated Pretreatment Instrument #1
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 5.39 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.02 | 0.5 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 1.0 |
| MDP2 | 6.59 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 0.6 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 1.0 |
| MDP3 | 8.02 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.05 | 0.6 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.07 | 0.9 |
| MDP4 | 12.11 | 0.05 | 0.4 | 0.05 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.7 | 0.04 | 0.3 | 0.12 | 1.0 |
| Control 1 | 4.44 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 0.04 | 0.8 | 0.03 | 0.7 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.06 | 1.3 |
| Control 2 | 8.97 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.05 | 0.6 | 0.07 | 0.8 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.10 | 1.1 |
NGSP: ADVIA 1800 Automated Pretreatment Instrument #2
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 5.32 | 0.01 | 0.3 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.06 | 1.0 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.06 | 1.2 |
| MDP2 | 6.52 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.07 | 1.1 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.08 | 1.2 |
| MDP3 | 7.97 | 0.02 | 0.2 | 0.04 | 0.4 | 0.08 | 1.0 | 0.02 | 0.2 | 0.09 | 1.2 |
| MDP4 | 12.11 | 0.03 | 0.2 | 0.06 | 0.5 | 0.12 | 1.0 | 0.02 | 1.0 | 0.14 | 1.1 |
| Control 1 | 4.53 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 0.05 | 1.2 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.06 | 1.4 |
| Control 2 | 9.14 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.08 | 0.9 | 0.07 | 0.8 | 0 | 0 | 0.11 | 1.2 |
NGSP: ADVIA 1800 Automated Pretreatment Instrument #3
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 5.38 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.02 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 1.0 |
| MDP2 | 6.58 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.04 | 0.7 |
| MDP3 | 8.03 | 0.02 | 0.2 | 0.04 | 0.4 | 0.08 | 1.0 | 0.02 | 0.2 | 0.09 | 1.2 |
| MDP4 | 12.11 | 0.05 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 0.3 | 0.04 | 0.3 | 0.05 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.7 |
| Control 1 | 4.50 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 0.03 | 0.7 | 0.02 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 1.0 |
| Control 2 | 9.02 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.04 | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.06 | 0.7 |
{7}
NGSP: ADVIA 1800 Automated Pretreatment Combined
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Instrument | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 5.36 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 0.7 | 0.04 | 0.8 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.06 | 1.2 |
| MDP2 | 6.56 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.05 | 0.7 | 0.04 | 0.6 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.07 | 1.1 |
| MDP3 | 8.01 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.06 | 0.7 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.08 | 1.0 |
| MDP4 | 12.11 | 0.04 | 0.4 | 0.05 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.7 | 0.03 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.2 | 0.12 | 1.0 |
| Control 1 | 4.49 | 0.02 | 0.5 | 0.03 | 0.7 | 0.04 | 0.8 | 0.05 | 1.1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 1.6 |
| Control 2 | 9.05 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.06 | 0.6 | 0.06 | 0.7 | 0.09 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 1.4 |
IFCC: ADVIA 1800 Automated Pretreatment Instrument #1
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 35.41 | 0.26 | 0.7 | 0.27 | 0.8 | 0.36 | 1.0 | 0.32 | 0.9 | 0.61 | 1.7 |
| MDP2 | 48.49 | 0.30 | 0.6 | 0.26 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 0.9 | 0.38 | 0.8 | 0.69 | 1.4 |
| MDP3 | 64.17 | 0.32 | 0.5 | 0.33 | 0.5 | 0.55 | 0.9 | 0.36 | 0.6 | 0.80 | 1.2 |
| MDP4 | 108.85 | 0.56 | 0.5 | 0.53 | 0.5 | 0.97 | 0.9 | 0.42 | 0.4 | 1.31 | 1.2 |
| Control 1 | 25.01 | 0.28 | 1.1 | 0.39 | 1.6 | 0.32 | 1.3 | 0.21 | 0.8 | 0.62 | 2.5 |
| Control 2 | 74.52 | 0.36 | 0.5 | 0.60 | 0.8 | 0.80 | 1.1 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 1.06 | 1.4 |
IFCC: ADVIA 1800 Automated Pretreatment Instrument #2
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 35.41 | 0.15 | 0.4 | 0.22 | 0.6 | 0.60 | 1.7 | 0.17 | 0.5 | 0.68 | 2.0 |
| MDP2 | 48.49 | 0.15 | 0.3 | 0.31 | 0.6 | 0.76 | 1.6 | 0.19 | 0.4 | 0.86 | 1.8 |
| MDP3 | 64.17 | 0.20 | 0.3 | 0.39 | 0.6 | 0.90 | 1.4 | 0.21 | 0.3 | 1.03 | 1.6 |
| MDP4 | 108.85 | 0.33 | 0.3 | 0.61 | 0.6 | 1.33 | 1.2 | 0.18 | 0.2 | 1.51 | 1.4 |
| Control 1 | 25.01 | 0.17 | 0.6 | 0.30 | 1.1 | 0.59 | 2.3 | 0.10 | 0.4 | 0.69 | 2.7 |
| Control 2 | 74.52 | 0.25 | 0.3 | 0.88 | 1.1 | 0.79 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 1.20 | 1.6 |
{8}
IFCC: ADVIA 1800 Automated Pretreatment Instrument #3
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 35.41 | 0.22 | 0.6 | 0.21 | 0.6 | 0.27 | 0.8 | 0.15 | 0.4 | 0.43 | 1.2 |
| MDP2 | 48.49 | 0.20 | 0.4 | 0.24 | 0.5 | 0.33 | 0.7 | 0.19 | 0.4 | 0.49 | 1.0 |
| MDP3 | 64.17 | 0.17 | 0.3 | 0.27 | 0.4 | 0.33 | 0.5 | 0.33 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 0.9 |
| MDP4 | 108.85 | 0.53 | 0.5 | 0.46 | 0.4 | 0.39 | 0.4 | 0.58 | 0.5 | 0.99 | 0.9 |
| Control 1 | 25.01 | 0.28 | 1.1 | 0.35 | 1.4 | 0.23 | 0.9 | 0.08 | 0.3 | 0.51 | 2.0 |
| Control 2 | 74.52 | 0.26 | 0.3 | 0.31 | 0.4 | 0.44 | 0.6 | 0.26 | 0.4 | 0.65 | 0.9 |
IFCC: ADVIA 1800 Automated Pretreatment Combined
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Instrument | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 35.17 | 0.21 | 0.6 | 0.24 | 0.7 | 0.43 | 1.2 | 0.44 | 1.3 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.69 | 2.0 |
| MDP2 | 48.40 | 0.22 | 0.5 | 0.27 | 0.6 | 0.54 | 1.1 | 0.40 | 0.8 | 0.12 | 0.3 | 0.76 | 1.6 |
| MDP3 | 64.14 | 0.24 | 0.4 | 0.33 | 0.5 | 0.64 | 1.0 | 0.34 | 0.5 | 0.24 | 0.4 | 0.86 | 1.4 |
| MDP4 | 108.90 | 0.49 | 0.4 | 0.53 | 0.5 | 0.98 | 0.9 | 0.29 | 0.3 | 0.23 | 0.2 | 1.27 | 1.2 |
| Control 1 | 25.56 | 0.25 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.4 | 0.41 | 1.6 | 0.53 | 2.1 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.80 | 3.1 |
| Control 2 | 75.18 | 0.30 | 0.4 | 0.64 | 0.8 | 0.70 | 0.9 | 0.98 | 1.3 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 1.39 | 1.8 |
# Manual Pretreatment
NGSP: ADVIA 1800 Manual Pretreatment Instrument #1
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 5.30 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 0.06 | 1.0 |
| MDP2 | 6.48 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.06 | 0.9 |
| MDP3 | 7.91 | 0.04 | 0.5 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.04 | 0.6 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.07 | 0.9 |
| MDP4 | 12.03 | 0.07 | 0.6 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.09 | 0.8 | 0.05 | 0.4 | 0.13 | 1.1 |
| Control 1 | 4.66 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 0.03 | 0.7 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.06 | 1.2 |
| Control 2 | 9.20 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 0.04 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.9 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.11 | 1.2 |
{9}
NGSP: ADVIA 1800 Manual Pretreatment Instrument #2
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 5.29 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.05 | 1.0 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.06 | 1.1 |
| MDP2 | 6.49 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.07 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.07 | 1.1 |
| MDP3 | 7.92 | 0.02 | 0.2 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.08 | 1.0 | 0.02 | 0.2 | 0.09 | 1.1 |
| MDP4 | 12.08 | 0.04 | 0.4 | 0.05 | 0.4 | 0.11 | 0.9 | 0.02 | 0.2 | 0.13 | 1.1 |
| Control 1 | 4.77 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 0.06 | 1.2 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.07 | 1.4 |
| Control 2 | 9.36 | 0.02 | 0.2 | 0.04 | 0.4 | 0.10 | 1.1 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.11 | 1.2 |
NGSP: ADVIA 1800 Manual Pretreatment Instrument #3
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 5.28 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.05 | 0.9 |
| MDP2 | 6.48 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.7 |
| MDP3 | 7.90 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.04 | 0.5 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.06 | 0.8 |
| MDP4 | 11.98 | 0.03 | 0.2 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.05 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 0.4 | 0.08 | 0.7 |
| Control 1 | 4.72 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.03 | 0.7 | 0.04 | 0.7 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 1.1 |
| Control 2 | 9.25 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.06 | 0.7 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.07 | 0.8 |
NGSP: ADVIA 1800 Manual Pretreatment Combined
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Instrument | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 5.29 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.04 | 0.7 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.05 | 1.0 |
| MDP2 | 6.48 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.05 | 0.7 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.06 | 0.9 |
| MDP3 | 7.91 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.06 | 0.7 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.07 | 0.9 |
| MDP4 | 12.03 | 0.05 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 0.3 | 0.09 | 0.7 | 0.05 | 0.4 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.12 | 1.0 |
| Control 1 | 4.72 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.03 | 0.7 | 0.04 | 0.9 | 0.05 | 1.1 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.08 | 1.6 |
| Control 2 | 9.27 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.08 | 0.9 | 0.08 | 0.9 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.13 | 1.4 |
{10}
IFCC: ADVIA 1800 Manual Pretreatment Instrument #1
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 34.45 | 0.31 | 0.9 | 0.31 | 0.9 | 0.25 | 0.7 | 0.33 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.8 |
| MDP2 | 47.33 | 0.33 | 0.7 | 0.31 | 0.7 | 0.34 | 0.7 | 0.32 | 0.7 | 0.65 | 1.4 |
| MDP3 | 62.92 | 0.44 | 0.7 | 0.28 | 0.4 | 0.48 | 0.8 | 0.36 | 0.6 | 0.79 | 1.3 |
| MDP4 | 107.92 | 0.75 | 0.7 | 0.34 | 0.3 | 1.03 | 1.0 | 0.57 | 0.5 | 1.43 | 1.3 |
| Control 1 | 27.47 | 0.32 | 1.2 | 0.36 | 1.3 | 0.29 | 1.1 | 0.21 | 0.8 | 0.60 | 2.2 |
| Control 2 | 77.02 | 0.54 | 0.7 | 0.39 | 0.5 | 0.94 | 1.2 | 0.14 | 0.2 | 1.16 | 1.5 |
IFCC: ADVIA 1800 Manual Pretreatment Instrument #2
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 34.27 | 0.13 | 0.4 | 0.23 | 0.7 | 0.57 | 1.7 | 0.11 | 0.3 | 0.63 | 1.8 |
| MDP2 | 47.40 | 0.14 | 0.3 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.72 | 1.5 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.77 | 1.6 |
| MDP3 | 63.08 | 0.17 | 0.3 | 0.35 | 0.6 | 0.83 | 1.3 | 0.18 | 0.3 | 0.93 | 1.5 |
| MDP4 | 108.47 | 0.48 | 0.4 | 0.55 | 0.5 | 1.18 | 1.1 | 0.25 | 0.2 | 1.41 | 1.3 |
| Control 1 | 28.63 | 0.11 | 0.4 | 0.33 | 1.2 | 0.62 | 2.2 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.71 | 2.5 |
| Control 2 | 78.78 | 0.22 | 0.3 | 0.40 | 0.5 | 1.11 | 1.4 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 1.20 | 1.5 |
IFCC: ADVIA 1800 Manual Pretreatment Instrument #3
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 34.31 | 0.18 | 0.5 | 0.28 | 0.8 | 0.34 | 1.0 | 0.17 | 0.5 | 0.50 | 1.5 |
| MDP2 | 47.34 | 0.23 | 0.5 | 0.26 | 0.6 | 0.36 | 0.8 | 0.16 | 0.3 | 0.53 | 1.1 |
| MDP3 | 62.96 | 0.22 | 0.3 | 0.30 | 0.5 | 0.47 | 0.7 | 0.31 | 0.5 | 0.67 | 1.1 |
| MDP4 | 107.94 | 0.30 | 0.3 | 0.38 | 0.4 | 0.56 | 0.5 | 0.47 | 0.4 | 0.87 | 0.8 |
| Control 1 | 28.06 | 0.20 | 0.7 | 0.37 | 1.3 | 0.38 | 1.4 | 0.10 | 0.4 | 0.58 | 2.1 |
| Control 2 | 77.78 | 0.26 | 0.3 | 0.28 | 0.4 | 0.66 | 0.9 | 0.29 | 0.4 | 0.82 | 1.1 |
{11}
IFCC: ADVIA 1800 Manual Pretreatment Combined
| Sample ID | HbA1c % | Repeatability | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Between Instrument | | Between Lot | | Toal Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| MDP1 | 34.31 | 0.22 | 0.6 | 0.27 | 0.8 | 0.41 | 1.2 | 0.14 | 0.4 | 0.18 | 0.5 | 0.59 | 1.7 |
| MDP2 | 47.34 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.27 | 0.6 | 0.50 | 1.1 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.20 | 0.4 | 0.66 | 1.4 |
| MDP3 | 62.96 | 0.30 | 0.5 | 0.31 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 1.0 | 0.12 | 0.2 | 0.27 | 0.4 | 0.81 | 1.3 |
| MDP4 | 107.94 | 0.54 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 0.4 | 0.96 | 0.9 | 0.57 | 0.5 | 0.14 | 0.1 | 1.32 | 1.2 |
| Control 1 | 28.06 | 0.23 | 0.8 | 0.36 | 1.3 | 0.45 | 1.6 | 0.58 | 2.1 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.85 | 3.0 |
| Control 2 | 77.78 | 0.37 | 0.5 | 0.36 | 0.5 | 0.92 | 1.2 | 0.91 | 1.2 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 1.39 | 1.8 |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity testing was conducted based on CLSI EP06-A, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline. A dilution series consisting of 11 levels across the assay range were prepared by mixing high HbA1c and low HbA1c whole blood pools. Samples levels evaluated were 2.77, 3.51, 4.25, 4.99, 5.73, 7.21, 8.69, 10.16, 11.64, 13.12, and $14.60\%$ HbA1c (6.73, 14.81, 22.90, 30.98, 39.07, 55.24, 71.41, 87.58, 103.74, 119.91, and $136.08 \mathrm{mmol} / \mathrm{mol}$ HbA1c). Three replicates were tested at each level. The measured values were compared to the expected values. The regression parameters (slope, intercept, and $\mathbf{r}^2$ ) are the following:
NGSP:
| Slope | Intercept | R² | Concentration Range Tested |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.009 | -0.111 | 0.999 | 2.77 to 14.60% HbA1c |
IFCC:
| Slope | Intercept | R2 | Concentration Range Tested |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.009 | -0.974 | 0.999 | 6.73 to 136.08 mmol/mol HbA1c |
The linearity study supports the claimed assay measuring range of 3.8 to $14.0\%$ HbA1c (18.01 to 129.51 mmol/mol HbA1c (IFCC)).
# c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
# Traceability
The ADVIA Chemistry Enzymatic Hemoglobin A1c (A1c_E) assay standardization is traceable to the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) reference calibrators. The ADVIA Chemistry Enzymatic Hemoglobin A1c (A1c_E) assay is
{12}
certified through the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP). The NGSP certification expires in one year. See NGSP website for current certification at http://www.ngsp.org.
The derived results of (%) from the NGSP correlation are calculated from the individual quantitative results for Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).
The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) units of mmol/mol are calculated using the Master Equation NGSP (%) = 0.09148 x IFCC (mmol/mol) + 2.152. HbA1c results are provided to the customers using two different units: NGSP equivalent units (%) and IFCC equivalent units (mmol/mol).
d. Detection limit:
Limit of Blank (LoB) and Limit of Detection (LoD) testing was conducted in accordance with CLSI EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures.
The LoB and LoD values were determined by measuring 180 blank measurements and 180 low-level HbA1c measurement.
To determine LoB and LoD, 4 blank and whole blood low level samples each were processed using 3 reagent lots and 1 instrument. Testing was performed for 3 days at 5 replicates per day for a total of 60 measurements per reagent lot (180 measurements total per LoB and LoD).
The detection limits are summarized in the tables below:
Hemoglobin
| Limit | %HbA1c | μmol/L tHb | μmol/L A1c |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Limit of Blank (LoB) | 3.18 | 60.15 μmol/L | 1.77 μmol/L |
| Limit of Detection (LoD) | 3.60 | 69.42 μmol/L | 2.50 μmol/L |
The ADVIA® Chemistry Enzymatic Hemoglobin A1c (A1c_E) assay has a reportable range of 3.80–14.00 % HbA1c (18.03–129.51 mmol/mol HbA1c).
e. Analytical specificity:
Testing to determine the interference bias of various endogenous and exogenous interferents on the ADVIA A1c_E Assay was performed according to CLSI EP07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline – Second Edition.
The effect of each interferent listed below was evaluated using a paired difference analysis that compared HbA1c values of control samples (whole blood without any
13
{13}
added interferent) and test samples (whole blood spiked with the interferent being tested). Three replicates were tested for each of two HbA1c levels: $6.5\% \pm 1.0\%$ and $8.0\% \pm 1.0\%$ .
The sponsor defines significant interference as $\geq \pm 5\%$ change in the HbA1c measurements from the control value was considered an interferent. Five pools with different concentrations of each interferent. The following substances demonstrated no significant interference at the concentrations described below:
Endogenous Interference Summary
| Interferent | Highest Concentration Level Tested with No Interference |
| --- | --- |
| Conjugated Bilirubin* | 10.00 mg/dL |
| Unconjugated Bilirubin | 10.00 mg/dL |
| Total Protein | 22 g/dL |
| Triglycerides | 2000 mg/dL |
| Intralipid | 1000 mg/dL |
| Urea | 667 mg/dL |
| Vitamin E | 8.6 mg/dL |
| Rheumatoid Factor | 200 IU/mL |
| Glucose | 1000 mg/dL |
Exogenous Interference Summary
| Interferent | Highest Concentration Level Tested with No Interference |
| --- | --- |
| Acarbose | 50 mg/dL |
| Acetaminophen | 200 μg/mL |
| Acetylsalicylate | 50.0 mg/dL |
| Ascorbic Acid | 3.0 mg/dL |
| Atorvastatin | 600 μg Eq/L |
| Captopril | 0.5 mg/dL |
| Chlorpropamide | 74.7 mg/dL |
| Cyanate | 64.8 mg/dL |
| Furosemide | 6.0 mg/dL |
| Gemfibrozil | 7.5 mg/dL |
| Ibuprofen | 0.5 mg/mL |
| Insulin | 450 μU/mL |
| Losartan | 5 mg/dL |
{14}
| Interferent | Highest Concentration Level Tested with No Interference |
| --- | --- |
| Metamizole* | 90.0 mg/dL |
| Metformin | 5.1 mg/dL |
| N-acetylcysteine* | 5.0 mmol/L |
| Nicotinic Acid | 61 mg/dL |
| Propranolol | 0.2 mg/dL |
| Repaglinide | 60 ng/mL |
## Hemoglobin derivative interference
Testing to determine the interference bias of hemoglobin derivatives on the ADVIA A1c_E Assay was performed according to CLSI EP07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline – Second Edition.
The effect of each hemoglobin derivative was evaluated using a paired difference analysis that compared HbA1c values between control samples (whole blood without any added derivative) and test samples (whole blood spiked with the derivative being tested). Three replicates were tested at each of two HbA1c levels: 6.5% ± 1.0% and 8.0% ± 1.0%.
| Highest Derivative Concentration with No Significant Interference |
| --- |
| Acetylated Hb
(up to 50 mg/dL of acetylsalicylic acid) |
| Carbamylated Hb
(up to 10 mmol/L of Cyanate) |
| Labile Hb
(up to 1000 mg/dL of Glucose) |
To verify that HbA1a, HbA1b, or HbA0 derivatives did not interfere with assay performance, the sponsor evaluated the assay's HbA1c recovery of whole blood patient samples with known HbA1c, HbA1a, HbA1b, and HbA0 concentrations. The highest concentrations tested with no interference were 1.7, 1.4, and 86.0% for HbA1a, HbA1b, and HbA0, respectively. The data supports the sponsor's claim that HbA0, HbA1a, and HbA1b do not interfere with assay results.
## Hemoglobin Variant Testing
Interference testing to determine the effect of hemoglobin variants on the ADVIA A1c_E Assay was performed according to CLSI EP07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline – Second Edition.
{15}
Anticoagulated (K₂EDTA) human venous whole blood samples with known concentrations of hemoglobin variant and HbA1c were obtained from NGSP (HbC, HbD, HbE, HbS, and HbF) and IFCC (HbA2). The effect of each hemoglobin variant on assay performance was evaluated by analyzing these samples and comparing the %HbA1c values obtained by using the candidate assay on the ADVIA 1800 to the comparator %HbA1c values. Comparator values were obtained on the Trinity Biotech Ultra 2 A1c, with the acceptance of HbF that was measured on the Tosoh G8 and HbC measured on the Trinity Biotech Ultra 2 A1c and Bio-Rad Variant II Turbo provided by the supplier of the sample. To obtain values across the assay range, some samples were combined into pools. Testing was performed in triplicate in the results are summarized below:
| Hb Variant | Number of Samples | % Concentration of Variant in Sample | %HbA1c Concentraiton Range |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| HbC | 45 | 26.1 – 40.0%% | 4.4– 15.7% |
| HbD | 24 | 22.7 – 37.5% | 4.8 – 13.0% |
| HbE | 20 | 19.7 – 30.4% | 4.7 – 11.0% |
| HbS | 25 | 23.0 – 37.4% | 5.3 – 13.5% |
| HbA2 | 20 | 4.3 – 6.2% | 5.0 – 10.0% |
| HbF | 20 | 5.7 – 30.9% | 4.6 – 9.3% |
Hemoglobin Variant Study Summary Results
| Hb Variant | % Bias (Range of % Bias) for ~6% HbA1c | % Bias (95% CI) for ~9% HbA1c |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HbC | 0.65% [-6.17 to 7.46%] | 1.36% [-7.00% to 8.41%] |
| HbD | 0.28% [-8.16 to 6.47%] | 2.27% [-1.52 to 5.94%] |
| HbE | 2.02% [-5.65 to 7.89%] | 4.35% [-1.63 to 7.41%] |
| HbS | 2.96% [-0.22 to 6.55%] | 2.51% [-2.04 to 7.94%] |
| HbA2 | -1.49% [-3.87 to 5.00%] | 1.47% [-1.26 to 6.63%] |
| HbF | Bias exceeds 5% | |
Significant interference was defined by the sponsor as $\geq \pm 5\%$ change in HbA1c value in the presence of the hemoglobin variant relative to control. The results show there is no significant interference for HbS ($\leq 37.4\%$), HbC ($\leq 40.0\%$), HbD ($\leq 37.5\%$), HbE ($\leq 30.4\%$), and HbA2 ($\leq 6.2\%$) at the concentrations tested in this study. The labeling states:
{16}
The ADVIA Chemistry A1c_E assay has significant interference with the fetal hemoglobin (HbF). Hemoglobin A1c results are invalid for patients with abnormal amounts of HbF, including those with known Hereditary Persistence of Fetal Hemoglobin.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Method comparison testing was performed in accordance with CLSI EP09-A3, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline – Third Edition. 163 human whole blood and hemolysate samples in K₂EDTA with values spanning the assay range of 3.80 to 13.60% HbA1c (18.03 to 125.14 mmol/mol HbA1c) were tested. The candidate device results were compared to those obtained from testing at a secondary NGSP reference laboratory on the Tosoh G8 HPLC method. Testing was completed in automated and manual modes. The distribution of samples spanning the measuring interval for both whole blood and hemolysate methods as follows:
Distribution of Samples, Automated (Whole Blood)
| % HbA1c Level | n | % of Samples tested |
| --- | --- | --- |
| <5 | 12 | 7 |
| 5-6 | 23 | 14 |
| 6-6.5 | 40 | 25 |
| 6.5-7 | 30 | 18 |
| 7-8 | 20 | 12 |
| 8-9 | 21 | 13 |
| >9 | 17 | 10 |
| Total | 163 | 100 |
Distribution of Samples, Manual (Hemolysate)
| % HbA1c Level | n | % of Samples tested |
| --- | --- | --- |
| <5 | 14 | 9 |
| 5-6 | 24 | 15 |
| 6-6.5 | 35 | 21 |
| 6.5-7 | 33 | 20 |
| 7-8 | 21 | 13 |
| 8-9 | 18 | 11 |
| >9 | 18 | 11 |
| Total | 163 | 100 |
{17}
Summary of Method Comparison Results:
Deming and Passing-Bablok regression analysis was performed for the candidate system versus the Tosoh G8 method. A summary of the whole blood (automated) and manual (hemolysate) results are provided below:
$\mathrm{N} = 163$ sample range $3.80 - 13.60\%$ HbA1c and 18.01 to $125.14~\mathrm{mmol / mol}$ HbA1c
| | | Slope | 95 % CI | y-intercept | 95% CI | R2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Passing-Bablok | NGSP (automated) | 1.019 | 1.000 to 1.037 | -0.110 | -0.248 to 0.010 | 0.99 |
| | NGSP (Manual) | 1.022 | 1.004 to 1.041 | -0.132 | -0.280 to-0.019 | 1.00 |
| | IFCC (Automated) | 1.019 | 1.000 to 1.037 | -0.761 | -1.848 to 0.109 | 0.99 |
| | IFCC (Manual) | 1.022 | 1.004 to 1.041 | -0.923 | -2.092 to-0.109 | 1.00 |
| Deming | NGSP (automated) | 1.020 | 1.004 to 1.036 | -0.120 | -0.265 to-0.006 | 0.99 |
| | NGSP (Manual) | 1.027 | 1.012 to 1.042 | -0.176 | -0.280 to-0.072 | 1.00 |
| | IFCC (Automated) | 1.020 | 1.004 to 1.036 | -0.840 | -1.738 to 0.058 | 0.99 |
| | IFCC (Manual) | 1.027 | 1.012 to 1.042 | -1.290 | -2.098 to-0.438 | 1.00 |

Whole blood (automated) scatter plot with Passing Bablok:
{18}


Hemolysate (manual) scatter plot with Passing Bablok:
{19}

Whole blood (automated) scatter plot with Deming:

{20}

# Hemolysate (manual) scatter plot with Deming:

{21}

Bias Estimation table
| %HbA1c | Automated (Whole Blood) | | Manual (Hemolysate) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Bias | % Bias | Bias | % Bias |
| 5.00 | -0.01 | -0.20 | -0.02 | -0.40 |
| 6.50 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.15 |
| 8.00 | 0.04 | 0.50 | 0.04 | 0.50 |
| 12.00 | 0.12 | 1.00 | 0.13 | 1.08 |
# Total Error calculations and estimation table
The bias estimation values determined in the method comparison study and precision estimates determined in the precision study were used to determine the total error at each of the levels listed in the tables below. Total error was calculated by the following equation:
$\% \mathrm{TE} = |\% \mathrm{Bias}| + (1.96 \times \% \mathrm{CV}) \times (1 + \% \mathrm{Bias} / 100)$
Total Error Summary, Automated (Whole Blood)
| %HbA1c | % Bias | %CV | %TE |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.00 | -0.20 | 1.19 | 2.52 |
| 6.50 | 0.15 | 1.07 | 2.24 |
| 8.00 | 0.50 | 0.99 | 2.44 |
| 12.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 2.88 |
{22}
Total Error Summary, Manual (Hemolysate)
| %HbA1c | % Bias | %CV | %TE |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.00 | -0.40 | 1.01 | 2.38 |
| 6.50 | 0.15 | 0.93 | 1.97 |
| 8.00 | 0.50 | 0.93 | 2.33 |
| 12.00 | 1.08 | 1.01 | 3.06 |
b. Matrix comparison:
Testing was performed to demonstrate equivalence between 4 different anticoagulants in accordance with CLSI EP09-A2.
Matched sets of whole human blood were collected by Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics in four anticoagulant tubes containing K2 EDTA, K3 EDTA, Na Fluoride/Na2 EDTA, and Lithium heparin. All samples were native (unaltered).
HbA1c values were measured for each sample using the ADVIA A1c_E assay on the ADVIA 1800 using 1 reagent lot and 1 instrument. Samples were analyzed in duplicate. Only the first replicate values were used in statistical analysis. Regression analysis was used to analyze the measured values using the K2 EDTA samples as the comparator (i.e., the value plotted on the x-axis).
Deming Regression Analysis
| Anticoagulant | Comparator | N | r | Slope | y-intercept |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| K3-EDTA | K2-EDTA | 96 | 0.99 | 1.11 | -0.034 |
| Na Fluoride/Na2-EDTA | K2-EDTA | 97 | 0.99 | 0.996 | 0.008 |
| Lithium Heparin | K2-EDTA | 96 | 0.99 | 1.033 | -0.131 |
Passing-Bablok Regression Analysis
| Anticoagulant | Comparator | N | r | Slope | y-intercept |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| K3-EDTA | K2-EDTA | 96 | 0.999 | 1.010 | -0.021 |
| Na Fluoride/Na2-EDTA | K2-EDTA | 97 | 0.999 | 0.998 | -0.002 |
| Lithium Heparin | K2-EDTA | 96 | 0.999 | 1.025 | -0.096 |
These results support the use of the ADVIA A1c_E assay with samples collected in K2-EDTA, K3-EDTA, Na Fluoride/Na2-EDTA, or Lithium Heparin tubes. In addition, the sponsor states the following in the limitations section of their labeling:
"Do not use sodium fluoride/potassium oxalate collection tubes as they may
{23}
interfere with the results of the ADVIA Chemistry A1c_E assay."
# 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable.
# 4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
# 5. Expected values/Reference range:
The existing Reference Interval was taken from the American Diabetes Association, "Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus", Diabetes Care; 40 (Supplement 1): S11-S24; 2017.
| Suggested Diagnosis | HbA1c (%) | HbA1c (mmol/mol) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Diabetic | ≥ 6.5 | ≥ 48 |
| Prediabetes | 5.7-6.4 | 39-47 |
| Normal | < 5.7 | < 39 |
# N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10 and the special controls for this device type under 21 CFR 862.1373.
# O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.