K171605 · Roche Diagnostics · MOI · Feb 20, 2018 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K171605
Device Name
Elecsys CA 15-3 II
Applicant
Roche Diagnostics
Product Code
MOI · Immunology
Decision Date
Feb 20, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.6010
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Immunological in vitro assay for quantitative determination of CA 15-3 in human serum and Li-heparin plasma to aid in the management of breast cancer patients. In conjunction with other clinical and diagnostic procedures, serial testing with this assay is an aid in the early detection of recurrence in previously treated stage II and III breast cancer patients for monitoring response to therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients. The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay "ECLIA" is intended for use on cobas e immunoassay analyzers.
Device Story
Two-step sandwich immunoassay; uses streptavidin-coated microparticles and electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA) detection. Input: human serum or Li-heparin plasma. Reagents include biotinylated monoclonal antibody (115D8) and ruthenium-labeled monoclonal anti-CA 15-3 antibody (DF3). Operation: performed on cobas e immunoassay analyzers (e.g., cobas e 801). Calibration uses a 2-point method and a master curve provided via reagent barcode. Output: quantitative CA 15-3 concentration (U/mL). Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. Results assist clinicians in managing breast cancer patients by identifying recurrence or monitoring treatment efficacy. Benefits include standardized, automated serial testing for disease management.
Clinical Evidence
No new clinical studies were performed. Substantial equivalence is supported by analytical performance data including precision (within-run, between-run, between-day, between-lot, and site-to-site), linearity (3.0–300 U/mL), limit of quantitation (1.6 U/mL), and interference testing. Method comparison against the predicate (cobas e 601) using 190 samples showed a correlation coefficient of 0.97. Matrix comparison (serum vs. Li-heparin plasma) showed a correlation of 0.97. Reference range verification was performed using 20 healthy subjects.
Indicated for breast cancer patients, specifically for early detection of recurrence in previously treated stage II and III patients and monitoring therapy response in metastatic patients. Prescription use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A tumor-associated antigen immunological test system is a device that consists of reagents used to qualitatively or quantitatively measure, by immunochemical techniques, tumor-associated antigens in serum, plasma, urine, or other body fluids. This device is intended as an aid in monitoring patients for disease progress or response to therapy or for the detection of recurrent or residual disease.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). Tumor markers must comply with the following special controls: (1) A guidance document entitled “Guidance Document for the Submission of Tumor Associated Antigen Premarket Notifications (510(k)s) to FDA,” and (2) voluntary assay performance standards issued by the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
K171605
B. Purpose for Submission:
Modification of Previously Cleared Device – Addition of cobas e 801 instrument for the use of the device
C. Measurand:
CA 15-3
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Roche Diagnostics
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Elecsys CA 15-3 II
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR §866.6010 – Tumor-associated antigen immunological test system
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
MOI – System, test, immunological, antigen, tumor
4. Panel:
Immunology (82)
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use:
Immunological in vitro assay for quantitative determination of CA 15-3 in human serum and Li-heparin plasma to aid in the management of breast cancer patients. In conjunction with other clinical and diagnostic procedures, serial testing with this assay is an aid
- in the early detection of recurrence in previously treated stage II and III breast cancer patients
- for monitoring response to therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients
The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay “ECLIA” is intended for use on cobas e 801 immunoassay analyzers.
2. Indications for use:
Same as Intended Use above
3. Special conditions for use statement:
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
cobas e 801 immunoassay analyzer (K162606)
I. Device Description:
The cobas e pack for Elecsys CA 15-3 II contains the following reagents:
M: Streptavidin-coated microparticles (0.72 mg/mL) in preservative, 1 bottle (12.4 mL)
R1: Biotinalyted monoclonal anti-CA 15-3 antibody (115D8; mouse) (1.75 mg/L) in phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) and preservative, 1 bottle (19.7 mL)
R2: Monoclonal anti-CA 15-3 antibody (DF3; mouse) (10 mg/L) labeled with ruthenium complex in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and preservative, 1 bottle (19.7 mL)
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name:
CA 15-3 II Assay
{2}
2. Predicate 510(k) number:
K001468
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device Elecsys CA 15-3 II on cobas e 801 | Predicate CA 15-3 II |
| Intended Use | Immunological in vitro assay for quantitative determination of CA 15-3 in human serum to aid in the management of breast cancer patients. In conjunction with other clinical and diagnostic procedures, serial testing with this assay is an aid • in the early detection of recurrence in previously treated stage II and III breast cancer patients • for monitoring response to therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay “ECLIA” is intended for use on cobas e 801 immunoassay analyzers. | Same |
| Capture Antibody | Biotinylated mouse monoclonal antibody (I1508) and DF3 antibodies | Same |
| Detection Antibody | Ruthenium labeled mouse monoclonal antibody (DF3) | Same |
| Calibrators | CA 15-3 II CalSet | Same |
| Controls | PreciControl Tumor Marker | Same |
| Traceability | The method has been standardized against the Enzymun-Test CA 15-3 method. This in turn has been standardized against the CA 15-3 RIA from Fujirebio Diagnostics. | Same |
| Sample Stability | 2–8°C: 5 days -20°C: 90 days | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device Elecsys CA 15-3 II on cobas e 801 | Predicate CA 15-3 II |
| Instrument Platform | cobas e 801 | Elecsys 2010 Modular Analytics E170 cobas e 411 cobas e 601 cobas e 602 |
{3}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device Elecsys CA 15-3 II on cobas e 801 | Predicate CA 15-3 II |
| Sample type | Human serum and Li-heparin plasma | Human serum, (Li-, Na-, NH4+ -) heparin plasma, and K3-EDTA plasma |
| Prewash | Added | None |
| Sample dilution | 1:20 | 1:10 |
| Sample volume | 12 μL | 20 μL |
| Measuring range | 3.0–300 U/mL | 1.0–300 U/mL |
| Calibration Frequency | After 28 days when using the same cobas e pack on the analyzer | After 7 days (when using the same reagent kit on the analyzer) |
| Reagent Stability | Unopened: 18 months
Opened: N/A
On-board: 16 weeks | Unopened: 18 months
Opened: 12 weeks
On-board: 5 weeks |
| Assay – Reagent Preparation | Place the cooled (stored at 2–8°C) cobas e pack on the reagent manager. | Bring the cooled reagents to approximately 20°C and place on the reagent disk (20°C) of the analyzer |
| Sample Stability | 20–25 °C: 48 hours | Not tested |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline—Third Edition
CLSI EP6-A, Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement, Approved Guideline.
CLSI EP09-A3, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline—Third Edition
CLSI EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline—Second Edition
CLSI C28-A3c, Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline—Third Edition
## L. Test Principle:
The Elecsys CA 15-3 II Test System is a two-step sandwich immunoassay with streptavidin microparticles and electrochemiluminescence detection for the quantitative determination of CA 15-3 in human serum and plasma. In the first step, CA 15-3 in the sample binds to biotinylated monoclonal CA 15-3 II specific antibody and a monoclonal CA 15-3 II specific
{4}
antibody labeled with a ruthenium complex) to form a sandwich complex. In the second step, the complex binds to the streptavidin-coated microparticles. The reaction mixture is aspirated into the measuring cell where the microparticles are magnetically captured onto the surface of the electrode and unbound substances are then removed with ProCell II M. Application of a voltage to the electrode then induces chemiluminescent emission which is measured by a photomultiplier. Results are determined using a calibration curve that is generated specifically on each instrument by a 2-point calibration and a master curve provided with the reagent barcode.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance: The test results met the sponsor’s pre-determined acceptance criteria for all analytical performance studies.
### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The within-laboratory precision of the Elecsys CA 15-3 II assay on cobas e 801 was evaluated according to CLSI guideline EP05-A3 by testing seven human serum pools samples and two control samples (PreciControl Tumor Marker: PC 1 and PC 2). Samples were tested in two replicates per run, two runs per day, for 21 days using one reagent lot on one cobas e 801 immunoassay analyzer (n=84 observations per sample). The results are summarized in the following table:
| Sample | Mean (U/mL) | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 1 | 3.33 | 0.08 | 2.3 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.22 | 6.6 | 0.23 | 7.0 |
| 1a | 3.80 | 0.07 | 1.9 | 0.02 | 0.6 | 0.25 | 6.5 | 0.26 | 6.8 |
| HS1 | 27.90 | 0.46 | 1.6 | 0.39 | 1.4 | 0.47 | 1.7 | 0.77 | 2.8 |
| HS2 | 102.00 | 2.19 | 2.1 | 0.80 | 0.8 | 1.70 | 1.7 | 2.89 | 2.8 |
| HS3 | 109.00 | 2.13 | 1.9 | 0.66 | 0.6 | 1.55 | 1.4 | 2.73 | 2.5 |
| HS4 | 277.00 | 8.61 | 3.1 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 5.63 | 2.0 | 10.30 | 3.7 |
| HS5 | 284.00 | 7.20 | 1.5 | 3.68 | 1.3 | 5.64 | 2.0 | 9.92 | 3.5 |
| PC 1 | 23.20 | 0.30 | 1.3 | 0.34 | 1.5 | 0.42 | 1.8 | 0.62 | 2.7 |
| PC 2 | 95.70 | 1.49 | 1.6 | 1.27 | 1.3 | 2.11 | 2.2 | 2.88 | 3.0 |
The lot-to-lot reproducibility was evaluated by testing five human sample pools and two controls (PC 1 and PC 2) using three lots of reagents. For each lot of reagent, each sample was tested in replicates of five per run, one run per day for five days on one cobas e 801 immunoassay analyzer (n=75 observations per sample). The results are summarized in the following table:
{5}
| Sample | Mean (U/mL) | Within-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 1 | 3.71 | 0.10 | 2.8 | 0.10 | 2.6 | 0.12 | 3.2 | 0.18 | 4.9 |
| 2 | 25.66 | 0.67 | 2.6 | 0.10 | 0.4 | 0.21 | 0.8 | 0.71 | 2.8 |
| 3 | 123.57 | 3.37 | 2.7 | 2.59 | 2.1 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 4.25 | 3.4 |
| 4 | 268.40 | 5.66 | 2.1 | 5.99 | 2.2 | 2.88 | 1.1 | 8.75 | 3.3 |
| 5 | 294.48 | 7.63 | 2.6 | 8.05 | 2.7 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 11.1 | 3.8 |
| PC 1 | 22.18 | 0.41 | 1.8 | 0.23 | 1.0 | 0.13 | 0.6 | 0.49 | 2.2 |
| PC 2 | 90.96 | 1.71 | 1.9 | 0.69 | 0.8 | 0.65 | 0.7 | 1.95 | 2.1 |
The site-to-site reproducibility reproducibility was evaluated by testing four human sample pools and two controls (PC 1 and PC 2) at three sites using the same lot of reagent. Each sample was tested in replicates of five per run, one run per day for five days on one cobas e 801 immunoassay analyzer at each site (n=75 observations per sample). The results are summarized in the following table:
| Sample | Mean (U/mL) | Within-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Site/Instrument | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 1 | 3.98 | 0.09 | 2.3 | 0.10 | 2.6 | 0.11 | 2.7 | 0.17 | 4.4 |
| 2 | 26.04 | 0.56 | 2.2 | 0.52 | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.77 | 2.9 |
| 3 | 123.73 | 2.80 | 2.2 | 3.16 | 2.5 | 2.44 | 2.0 | 4.88 | 3.9 |
| 4 | 266.72 | 6.08 | 2.3 | 8.91 | 3.3 | 9.80 | 3.7 | 14.60 | 5.5 |
| PC 1 | 22.63 | 0.36 | 1.6 | 0.52 | 2.3 | 0.13 | 0.6 | 0.64 | 2.8 |
| PC 2 | 91.84 | 1.72 | 1.9 | 2.54 | 2.8 | 1.59 | 1.7 | 3.45 | 3.8 |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity: Linearity of the Elecsys CA 15-3 II assay was evaluated using the cobas e 801 immunoassay analyzer according to CLSI guideline EP6-A. Fifteen dilutions were prepared by diluting each of three high analyte serum samples with concentration above $300\mathrm{U / mL}$ down across the lower end of the measuring range. Each dilution was measured in replicates of three on cobas e 801 analyzer. The data summarized in the table below support linearity throughout the claimed measuring range from $3.0\mathrm{U / mL}$ to $300\mathrm{U / mL}$ .
| Sample | Dilution Range (U/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | R² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 0.93–308.00 | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.00 (−1.07–1.07) | 0.99 |
| 2 | 1.33–313.00 | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.00 (−1.12–1.12) | 0.99 |
| 3 | 0.77–315.00 | 0.89 (0.99–0.01) | 0.10 (−1.51–1.51) | 0.99 |
{6}
Hook effect: The high-dose hook effect of the Elecsys CA 15-3 II assay was assessed using two positive serum samples spiked with CA 15-3 to achieve final analyte concentrations of 25,713 and 21,180 U/mL. Each sample was diluted to obtain five dilutions with CA 15-3 concentrations above the upper limit of the measuring range. Each dilution was tested in a single using one lot of reagent on one cobas e 801 analyzer. No hook effect was observed up to 20,000 U/mL.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability: There is no international standard available for CA 15-3. This method has been standardized against the Elecsys CA 15-3 assay. This in turn has been standardized against the Enzymun Test CA 15-3 method and CA 15-3 RIA by Fujirebio Diagnostics.
Value Assignment:
The predefined master curve is adapted to the analyzer using the relevant CalSet. The value assignment for the CalSet was described previously in K001468 and K010588.
Stability:
i) Reagent stability: Real-time stability studies for un-opened reagent stability (shelf life) and on-board stability studies were each performed. The results support that the reagents are stable when stored unopened at 2–8°C for 18 months or on-board (2–8°C) for 16 weeks on the cobas e 801 analyzer.
ii) Calibrator stability: The lot calibration and on-board calibration stability were performed on the cobas e 801 and support that the calibration for the Elecsys CA 15-3 II assay is stable for 12 weeks when using a same reagent lot and for 28 days when using the same cobas e pack on the cobas e 801 analyzer.
iii) Sample Stability: The studies were performed on the cobas e 801 for the following storage temperatures: 2–8°C, 20–25°C, and –20°C. The results support the claim that the specimens are stable up to five days at 2–8°C, up to two days at 20–25°C, and up to 90 days at –20°C.
d. Detection limit: The limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and limit of Quantitation (LoQ) of the Elecsys CA 15-3 II on the cobas e 801 analyzer were determined according to CLSI EP17-A2.
LoB was determined by testing analyte-free serum sample in 10 replicates per run, one run per day, for six days with three reagent lots on one cobas e 801 analyzer. The LoB was defined as the 95th percentile of 60 measurements for each of tested lots and determined to be 0.58, 0.21 and 0.43 U/mL for three lots. The claimed LoB is 1.0 U/mL.
LoD was determined using five serum samples with low analyte concentration. Each
{7}
sample was tested in replicates of two per run, one run per day, for six days with three reagent lots on one cobas e 801 analyzer. The LoD value was calculated as the LoB + 1.653 x SD of the replicates for the samples and determined to be 1.10, 0.416, and 0.631 U/mL for each of three lots. The claimed LoD is 1.5 U/mL
LoQ was determined using a set of ten serum samples with low analyte concentration. Each sample was tested in replicates of five per run, one run per day, for five days with three reagent lots on one cobas e 801 analyzer to generate 25 data points per sample per reagent lot. The LoQ is defined as the mean value of the sample which fulfills the specification for the total within-laboratory imprecision (<20% CV) and was determined to be 1.6, 1.46 and 1.43 U/mL for each of three lots. The claimed LoQ is 3 U/mL.
e. Analytical specificity:
i). Endogenous interferences:
The effect of the presence of elevated level of hemoglobin, lipemia, bilirubin and rheumatoid factor (RF) on the performance of the Elecsys CA 15-3 II assay on the cobas e 801 analyzer was evaluated by testing three serum samples with CA 15-3 concentration of 26 U/mL (low), 125 U/mL (medium) and 230 U/mL (high) spiked with varying levels of interferent. The % recovery for each sample was calculated by comparing to the reference sample (without spiking the interference substance). No interference was noted for samples containing hemoglobin up to 1,000 mg/dL, lipemia up to 2,000 mg/dL, bilirubin up to 66 mg/dL, and rheumatoid factors up to 1,500 IU/mL.
The effect of the presence of HAMA on the performance of the Elecsys CA 15-3 II assay was evaluated using three serum samples with analyte concentrations of 14.9, 124, and 240 U/mL on one cobas e 801 analyzer. The samples were tested by spiking with HAMA serum with a concentration of 805 ng/mL. The control samples were spiked analogously with a serum without interferent. The data support that no significant effect with HAMA up to 805 ng/mL on the performance of the Elecsys CA15-3 II assay.
The biotin interference on the performance of the Elecsys CA 15-3 II assay on the cobas e 801 was evaluated by testing three serum samples with CA 15-3 concentration of 26.6 U/mL, 146 U/mL, and 238 U/mL spiked with varying level of biotin up to 800 ng/mL. The results (% bias) are summarized in the following table:
8
{8}
9
| % Bias for Samples Containing Biotin | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample (U/mL) | Biotin Concentration (ng/mL) | | | | | | | | |
| | 160 | 240 | 320 | 400 | 480 | 560 | 640 | 720 | 800 |
| 26.6 | −4.5% | −5.2% | −6.2% | −8.2% | −11.5% | −8.9% | −9.8% | −13.5% | −13.0% |
| 146.0 | −4.0% | −6.5% | −9.4% | −11.8% | −12.3% | −14.9% | −15.1% | −16.1% | −17.7% |
| 238.0 | −1.7% | −3.0% | −0.9% | −6.7% | −5.5% | −7.7% | −10.4% | −11.5% | −12.4% |
The results indicated that sample with biotin concentrations up to 320 ng/mL demonstrated ≤10% bias in results. Biotin concentrations greater than 320 ng/mL can lead to falsely decreased CA15-3 results.
ii) Exogenous interferences:
The effect of the presence of drugs on the performance of the Elecsys CA 15-3 II assay on the cobas e 801 analyzer was evaluated by testing two serum samples with concentration of 30 U/mL and 230 U/mL spiked with interferent. A total of 27 pharmaceutical compounds including 16 common drugs and 11 additional specially used drugs were tested. No significant interference was found for each compound and drug at the concentrations listed below.
Commonly used pharmaceuticals:
| Name of Agent | Concentration | Name of Agent | Concentration |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Acetylcysteine | 1660 mg/L | Methyldopa | 20 mg/L |
| Ampicillin-Na | 1000 mg/L | Metronidazole | 120 mg/L |
| Ascorbic acid | 300 mg/L | Phenylbutazone | 400 mg/L |
| Cyclosporine | 5 mg/L | Acetylsalicylic Acid | 1000 mg/L |
| Cefoxitin | 2500 mg/L | Rifampicin | 60 mg/L |
| Heparin | 5000 U | Acetaminophen | 200 mg/L |
| Doxycycline | 30 mg/L | Ibuprofen | 500 mg/L |
| Levodopa | 20 mg/L | Theophylline | 100 mg/L |
Special Cancer Drugs:
| Name of Agent | Concentration | Name of Agent | Concentration |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Carboplatin | 1000 mg/L | Tamoxifen | 50 mg/L |
| Cisplatin | 225 mg/L | Mitomycin | 25 mg/L |
| Cyclophosphamide | 1000 mg/L | Etoposid | 400 mg/L |
| Doxorubicin | 75 mg/L | Flutamid | 1000 mg/L |
| Methotrexate | 200 mg/L | Taxol | 5.5 mg/L |
| 5-Fluoracil | 500 mg/L | | |
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
{9}
10
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
A total of 190 native human serum samples spanning the measuring range were tested with the Elecsys CA 15-3 II using the cobas e 801 (candidate) and the cobas e 601 (predicate) analyzers. Passing-Bablok regression analysis was performed and the data are summarized in the following table:
| N | Range (U/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | Correlation Coefficient |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 190 | 5.14–290.00 | 0.97 (0.95–0.98) | 0.57 (0.06–1.31) | 0.97 |
b. Matrix comparison:
A study was performed to demonstrate that Li-heparin plasma yield comparable values as serum by the Elecsys CA 15-3 II assay on the cobas e 801 analyzer. A total of 49 matrix-matched samples spread across the assay range were assayed using one lot of reagent on one instrument. Passing-Bablok regression analysis was performed and the data are summarized in the following table:
| N | Range (U/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | Correlation Coefficient |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 49 | 8.37–248.00 | 1.01 (0.98–1.04) | −0.92(−1.36– -0.21) | 0.97 |
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity and Clinical Specificity:
The clinical performance of CA 15-3 was demonstrated in K001468.
b. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The reference range in the normal population was previously generated by testing 272 samples from apparently healthy subjects. 95% of the results were ≤25 U/mL (K010588). This reference range was verified per CLSI guidance C28-A3c by testing 20 apparently healthy women in age of 20 to 64 years on the cobas e 801 analyzer. The
{10}
results showed that all 20 samples had a CA 15-3 value below 25 U/mL.
**N. Proposed Labeling:**
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
**O. Conclusion:**
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
11
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.