Retrospective clinical cohort used to validate clinical sensitivity and specificity of the QUANTA Flash Calprotectin assay against established IBD diagnostic criteria.
Clinical validation; IBD diagnosis; Retrospective cohort; Routine clinical practice
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Clinical Validation Set; Retrospective clinical cohort study; Follow-up/Duration: Not applicable; Study Period: 6 months (Site A)
Patients suspected of having IBD (including Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and controls with IBS or other conditions); Sample Size: 165; Number of Sites: 2
Not applicable for this study
Clinical sensitivity and specificity for IBD diagnosis
AI Performance
Output
Algorithm
Acceptance
Observed
Dev DS
Dev Readers
Test DS
Test Readers
Fecal calprotectin concentration
—
Total %CV < 12% (Precision); Total %CV < 15% (Reproducibility); Total imprecision CV% < 20% (LoQ); Recovery 88% - 112% (Recovery); 80-120% average recovery (Stability)
Total %CV 3.1% - 6.2% (Precision); Total %CV 3.2% - 10.8% (Reproducibility); LoQ 14.1 mg/kg; Recovery 94.7% - 109.8%
QUANTA Flash Calprotectin is a chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of fecal calprotectin in extracted human stool samples. Elevated levels of fecal calprotectin, in conjunction with clinical findings and other laboratory tests, can aid in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease), and in the differentiation of IBD from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Calibrators are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Reagents for the determination of fecal calprotectin levels in extracted stool samples. Each calibrator establishes a point of reference for the working curve that is used to calculate unit values. QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Controls are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Reagents for quality control in the determination of fecal calprotectin levels in extracted stool samples.
Device Story
Device is a chemiluminescent immunoassay for quantitative fecal calprotectin measurement. Input: extracted human stool samples. Operation: BIO-FLASH instrument (fully automated closed system) processes samples using paramagnetic beads coated with anti-calprotectin antibodies; sample incubated with beads; isoluminol-labeled monoclonal anti-calprotectin antibody added; trigger solutions (Fe(III)coproporphyrin/NaOH and urea-hydrogen peroxide/NaCl) added to induce chemiluminescence. Output: light flash measured as Relative Light Units (RLU), converted to mg/kg via lot-specific Master Curve and instrument-specific Working Curve. Used in clinical laboratories by technicians. Output aids clinicians in diagnosing IBD and differentiating from IBS, potentially reducing need for invasive procedures.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical validation study (N=165) compared device results against clinical diagnosis (58 IBD, 107 non-IBD/IBS). Sensitivity 89.5% (indeterminate as negative) to 96.5% (indeterminate as positive); specificity 74.1% to 86.1%. Method comparison (N=137) against predicate showed correlation coefficient of 0.956. Bench testing included precision (CVs 3.1-12.9%), linearity (R²=1.00), and interference studies.
Technological Characteristics
Chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. Materials: paramagnetic beads coated with rabbit polyclonal anti-calprotectin, isoluminol-labeled monoclonal anti-calprotectin. Energy: chemiluminescent reaction (Trigger 1/Trigger 2). Form factor: reagent cartridge for BIO-FLASH instrument. Connectivity: automated system with barcode-based Master Curve upload. Software: automated processing and unit conversion.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative determination of fecal calprotectin in extracted human stool samples to aid in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease) and the differentiation of IBD from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in patients suspected of having IBD.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A fecal calprotectin immunological test system is an in vitro diagnostic device that consists of reagents used to quantitatively measure, by immunochemical techniques, fecal calprotectin in human stool specimens. The device is intended for in vitro diagnostic use as an aid in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), specifically Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and as an aid in differentiation of IBD from irritable bowel syndrome.
Special Controls
The device is classified as Class II under regulation 21 CFR 866.5180 with special controls. The special control guidance document, "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Fecal Calprotectin Immunological Test Systems" will be available shortly.
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for these devices is FDA's guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Fecal Calprotectin Immunological Test Systems.” For the availability of this guidance document, see § 866.1(e).
Predicate Devices
Calprest NG (QUANTA Lite® Calprotectin Extended Range ELISA) (K160447)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION MEMORANDUM
A. 510(k) Number:
K170993
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
Fecal Calprotectin
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, ELISA (chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay)
E. Applicant:
Inova Diagnostics, Inc
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
QUANTA Flash® Calprotectin Reagents
QUANTA Flash® Calprotectin Calibrators
QUANTA Flash® Calprotectin Controls
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
866.5180 – Fecal calprotectin immunological test system
862.1150 – Calibrator
862.1660 – Quality Control Material
2. Classification:
Class II
{1}
3. Product code:
NXO– Fecal calprotectin immunological test system
Immunoassay
JIT– Calibrator
4. Panel:
Immunology
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended uses:
QUANTA Flash Calprotectin is a chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of fecal calprotectin in extracted human stool samples. Elevated levels of fecal calprotectin, in conjunction with clinical findings and other laboratory tests, can aid in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease), and in the differentiation of IBD from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).
QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Calibrators are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Reagents for the determination of fecal calprotectin levels in extracted stool samples. Each calibrator establishes a point of reference for the working curve that is used to calculate unit values.
QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Controls are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Reagents for quality control in the determination of fecal calprotectin levels in extracted stool samples.
2. Indications for use:
Same as Intended Use
3. Special conditions for use statement:
Prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
BIO-FLASH® instrument
{2}
3
I. Device Description:
The QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Reagents kit contains the following materials:
One (1) QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Reagent Cartridge
a. Anti-calprotectin antibodies coated paramagnetic beads.
b. Assay buffer – colored pink, containing Tris-buffered saline, Tween 20, protein stabilizers and preservatives.
c. Tracer anti-calprotectin – Isoluminol labeled anti-calprotectin monoclonal antibody in buffer, containing protein stabilizers and preservative.
One (1) bottle of QUANTA Flash Special Wash
The QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Calibrators kit contains two vials each of Calibrator 1, Calibrator 2, and Calibrator 3:
QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Calibrators:
- QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Calibrator 1: Two (2) barcode labeled tubes containing 0.3 mL prediluted, ready to use reagent. Calibrators contain recombinant calprotectin antigen in stabilizers and preservatives.
- QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Calibrator 2: Two (2) barcode labeled tubes containing 0.3 mL prediluted, ready to use reagent. Calibrators contain recombinant calprotectin antigen in stabilizers and preservatives.
- QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Calibrator 3: Two (2) barcode labeled tubes containing 0.3 mL prediluted, ready to use reagent. Calibrators contain recombinant calprotectin antigen in stabilizers and preservatives.
Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name:
Calprest NG, QUANTA Lite® Calprotectin Extended Range ELISA
2. Predicate 510(k) number:
K160447
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended use | QUANTA Flash Calprotectin is a chemiluminescent immunoassay for the | Calprest®NG is a quantitative ELISA for detecting concentration of fecal calprotectin, which |
{3}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | quantitative determination of fecal calprotectin in extracted human stool samples. Elevated levels of fecal calprotectin, in conjunction with clinical findings and other laboratory tests, can aid in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease), and in the differentiation of IBD from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). | can be used as an in vitro diagnostic to aid in the diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD), specifically Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and to differentiate IBD from Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings. |
| Assay Methodology | Solid phase (heterogeneous) immunoassay | Same |
| Capture antibody | Rabbit polyclonal anti-calprotectin | Same |
| Shelf-life | One year | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Detection/Operating principle | Chemiluminescent immunoassay | Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay |
| Solid phase | Paramagnetic microparticles (beads) | 96-well polystyrene plate |
| Conjugate | Isoluminol conjugated monoclonal anti-calprotectin antibody | HRP conjugated monoclonal anti-calprotectin antibody |
| Analytical Measuring Range | 16.1 – 3,500.0 mg/kg | 27.1 – 3,000.0 mg/kg |
| Calibration | Lot-specific Master Curve + three calibrators (sold separately) | Six lot-specific calibrators |
{4}
QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Calibrators
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Analyte | Recombinant calprotectin antigen (rAg) | Same |
| Units | ng/ml | Same |
| Shelf-life | One year | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended use | QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Calibrators are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Reagents for the determination of fecal calprotectin levels in extracted stool samples. Each calibrator establishes a point of reference for the working curve that is used to calculate unit values. | No separate intended use; calibrator is part of the kit. |
| Method | QUANTA Flash Calprotectin chemiluminescent immunoassay | QUANTA Lite Calprotectin Extended Range ELISA |
QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Controls
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | | |
| Analyte | Recombinant calprotectin antigen (rAg) | Same |
| | | |
| Units | ng/ml | Same |
| Shelf-life | One year | Same |
| | | |
| Storage | 2–8°C | Same |
{5}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended use | QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Controls are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash Calprotectin Reagents for quality control in the determination of fecal calprotectin levels in extracted stool samples. | No separate intended use; controls are part of the kit. |
| Method | QUANTA Flash Calprotectin chemiluminescent immunoassay | QUANTA Lite Calprotectin Extended Range ELISA |
| Levels | 2 (low and high) | 2 (1 and 2) |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Fecal Calprotectin Immunological Test Systems
CSLI EP05-A3: Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline-Third Edition
CLSI EP17-A2: Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline-Second Edition
CLSI EP06-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP28-A3c: Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline - Third Edition
## L. Test Principle:
The principle of the assay is chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay, a variation of solid phase immunoassay. The QUANTA Flash® Calprotectin assay is designed to run on the BIO-FLASH® instrument. This platform is a fully automated closed system with continuous load and random access capabilities that automatically processes the samples, runs the assay and reports the results. It includes liquid handling hardware, luminometer and computer with software-user interface. The QUANTA Flash® Calprotectin assay utilizes a reagent cartridge format, which is compatible with the BIO-FLASH® instrument.
{6}
Calprotectin-specific capture antibodies are coated on to paramagnetic beads, which are stored in the reagent cartridge under conditions that preserve the antibody in its reactive state. Prior to use in the BIO-FLASH® system, the reagent pack containing all the necessary assay reagents is mixed thoroughly by being inverted several times. The sealed reagent tubes are pierced with the reagent cartridge lid, and the reagent cartridge is loaded onto the instrument. Reagents are calibrated when the lot is first used. A patient extracted stool sample is prediluted by the BIO-FLASH® with sample buffer in a disposable plastic cuvette. Small amounts of the diluted patient extracted stool, the beads, and the assay buffer are all combined into a second cuvette, and mixed. This cuvette is then incubated at 37°C. The beads are magnetized and washed several times. Isoluminol conjugated monoclonal anti-calprotectin antibodies are then added to the cuvette, and again incubated at 37°C. The beads are magnetized and washed repeatedly. The isoluminol conjugate is oxidized when Trigger 1 (Fe(III)coproporphyrin in sodium hydroxide solution) and Trigger 2 (urea-hydrogen peroxide in sodium chloride solution) are added to the cuvette, and the flash of light produced from this reaction is measured as Relative Light Units (RLU) by the BIO-FLASH® optical system. The measured RLU is proportional to the amount of bound isoluminol conjugate, which is in turn proportional to the amount of calprotectin antigen captured by the antibodies (anti-calprotectin polyclonal antibodies in this case) on the beads. For quantitation, the QUANTA Flash® Calprotectin will utilize a predefined lot specific Master Curve that is uploaded onto the instrument through the reagent cartridge barcode. The Master Curve for each reagent pack lot with in-house Standards with assigned unit values (ng/mL). The RLU and assigned ng/mL values of the Standards are used to create a 4 parameter logistic curve. These four parameters are embedded in the reagent pack barcode. When the lot is used the first time, the Calibrators are run, and based on the results obtained on the Calibrators, an instrument specific Working Curve is created; The Working Curve is used to calculate units (ng/mL) based on RLU values obtained on each sample. The obtained ng/mL values will be converted to mg/kg by a calculation that takes into account the dilution of the samples. This unit conversion is calculated automatically by the software.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
All results met the manufacturer’s pre-determined acceptance criteria.
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
**Precision**
Precision was evaluated according to CLSI EP05-A3: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Procedures - Approved Guideline. Calprotectin was extracted from stool samples from ten samples with concentrations across the analytical measuring range (AMR) of the device. Samples were evaluated in duplicate, twice per day, for twenty days. Each sample had a total of 80 replicates. The results are presented in the table below:
{7}
8
| QUANTA Flash Calprotectin | | Repeatibility | | Between Runs | | Between Days | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | Mean (mg/kg) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 1 | 43.1 | 1.6 | 3.8% | 1.7 | 4.0% | 1.2 | 2.9% | 2.7 | 6.2% |
| 2 | 51.1 | 2.1 | 4.0% | 1.9 | 3.6% | 0.5 | 1.0% | 2.8 | 5.5% |
| 3 | 72.2 | 2.1 | 3.0% | 1.5 | 2.0% | 0.7 | 0.9% | 2.7 | 3.7% |
| 4 | 104.2 | 2.4 | 2.3% | 1.4 | 1.3% | 1.6 | 1.5% | 3.2 | 3.1% |
| 5 | 108.1 | 2.5 | 2.3% | 2.5 | 2.3% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 3.6 | 3.3% |
| 6 | 196.0 | 5.8 | 2.9% | 4.5 | 2.3% | 1.1 | 0.5% | 7.4 | 3.8% |
| 7 | 639.5 | 18.3 | 2.9% | 11.1 | 1.7% | 4.3 | 0.7% | 21.9 | 3.4% |
| 8 | 1086.9 | 34.2 | 3.1% | 27.0 | 2.5% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 43.6 | 4.0% |
| 9 | 1828.0 | 58.2 | 3.2% | 33.8 | 1.8% | 44.9 | 2.5% | 80.8 | 4.4% |
| 10 | 3036.3 | 90.2 | 3.0% | 120.3 | 4.0% | 46.2 | 1.5% | 157.3 | 5.2% |
## Reproducibility
### Between-Site:
Extracts were prepared from eight stool samples at a single site, frozen, then shipped to two additional sites. At the three different sites, the eight extracts with calprotectin concentrations across the AMR of the device were run in replicates of five, once per day, for five days, to generate a total of 25 replicates per site, and a total of 75 replicates per sample. The results are presented in the table below:
| Sample | Mean (mg/kg) | Within-Run | | Between-Day | | Within-Site | | Between-Site | | Total Imprecision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD (mg/kg) | CV (%) | SD (mg/kg) | CV (%) | SD (mg/kg) | CV (%) | SD (mg/kg) | CV (%) | SD (mg/kg) | CV (%) |
| 1 | 46.9 | 1.3 | 2.7% | 2.6 | 5.5% | 2.9 | 6.1% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 2.9 | 6.1% |
| 2 | 63.6 | 1.7 | 2.6% | 6.4 | 10.1% | 6.6 | 10.4% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 6.6 | 10.4% |
| 3 | 93.4 | 2.0 | 2.1% | 9.1 | 9.8% | 9.3 | 10.0% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 9.3 | 10.0% |
| 4 | 89.4 | 1.9 | 2.1% | 9.5 | 10.6% | 9.7 | 10.8% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 9.7 | 10.8% |
| 5 | 171.3 | 3.3 | 1.9% | 13.4 | 7.8% | 13.8 | 8.1% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 13.8 | 8.1% |
| 6 | 649.5 | 15.4 | 2.4% | 13.6 | 2.1% | 20.5 | 3.2% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 20.5 | 3.2% |
| 7 | 1127.5 | 27.4 | 2.4% | 55.5 | 4.9% | 61.9 | 5.5% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 61.9 | 5.5% |
| 8 | 1967.7 | 56.8 | 2.9% | 65.5 | 3.3% | 86.7 | 4.4% | 32.6 | 1.7% | 92.7 | 4.7% |
### Between-Lot:
Ten samples with concentration across the AMR were tested using three independent lots of reagent. Samples were run in replicates of five, once per day, for five days, to
{8}
generate a total of 75 replicates at a single site. The results are presented in the table below:
| QUANTA Flash Calprotectin | | Within-Run | | Between-Day | | Within-Lot | | Between-Lot | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | Mean (mg/k g) | SD (mg/k g) | CV (%) | SD (mg/k g) | CV (%) | SD (mg/k g) | CV (%) | SD (mg/k g) | CV (%) | SD (mg/k g) | CV (%) |
| 1 | 45.5 | 0.6 | 1.4% | 0.7 | 1.5% | 0.9 | 2.0% | 3.6 | 8.0% | 3.8 | 8.3% |
| 2 | 54.1 | 2.4 | 4.5% | 1.8 | 3.4% | 3.0 | 5.6% | 4.2 | 7.8% | 5.2 | 9.7% |
| 3 | 76.3 | 2.2 | 2.9% | 1.6 | 2.0% | 2.7 | 3.6% | 6.7 | 8.7% | 7.2 | 9.4% |
| 4 | 109.7 | 3.8 | 3.5% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 3.8 | 3.5% | 13.6 | 12.4 % | 14.1 | 12.9 % |
| 5 | 113.6 | 3.0 | 2.6% | 2.6 | 2.3% | 4.0 | 3.5% | 11.5 | 10.1 % | 12.1 | 10.7 % |
| 6 | 203.7 | 6.0 | 2.9% | 3.4 | 1.7% | 6.9 | 3.4% | 18.8 | 9.2% | 20.0 | 9.8% |
| 7 | 674.8 | 20.0 | 3.0% | 19.9 | 2.9% | 28.2 | 4.2% | 14.6 | 2.2% | 31.7 | 4.7% |
| 8 | 1145.4 | 37.6 | 3.3% | 42.4 | 3.7% | 56.7 | 4.9% | 21.9 | 1.9% | 60.7 | 5.3% |
| 9 | 1955.4 | 75.6 | 3.9% | 54.0 | 2.8% | 92.9 | 4.8% | 33.4 | 1.7% | 98.7 | 5.0% |
| 10 | 2933.2 | 99.6 | 3.4% | 137.7 | 4.7% | 169.9 | 5.8% | 174.4 | 5.9% | 243.5 | 8.3% |
# Extraction reproducibility (Between-operator):
Five frozen stool samples were extracted three times per day, and by three different operators. Samples were run in replicates of five, once a day, for five days, to generate 15 data points per operator. A total of 75 replicates for each sample were measured. The results are presented in the table below:
| Sample | Number of Replicates | Mean (mg/kg) | Between Operator Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD (mg/kg) | CV (%) |
| 1 | 75 | 59.01 | 4.3 | 7.2% |
| 2 | 75 | 108.10 | 9.0 | 8.3% |
| 3 | 75 | 131.41 | 6.0 | 4.5% |
| 4 | 75 | 220.93 | 21.6 | 9.8% |
| 5 | 75 | 1465.60 | 95.7 | 6.5% |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The linearity of the AMR of the QUANTA Flash Calprotectin was evaluated according to CLSI EP06-A, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline. The linearity was evaluated using extracted stool samples. Three extracted stool samples with various calprotectin antigen concentrations were combined with another extracted stool sample containing low levels of calprotectin antigen to obtain values that cover the entire AMR. The dilutions were assayed in duplicates. The results are presented in the table below, including the regression statistics using standard linear regression.
{9}
| Stool Sample | Test Range (mg/kg) | Slope (95% CI) | Y-Intercept (95% CI) | R² | Average % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 4102.8 to 410.3 | 1.02 (0.97–1.06) | 16.1 (-90.1–122.3) | 1.00 | 102.6% |
| 2 | 890.3 to 89.0 | 0.95 (0.90–1.00) | 11.9 (-14.2–38.0) | 1.00 | 100.0% |
| 3 | 155.6 to 15.6 | 1.12 (0.98–126) | -5.5 (-19.0–8.0) | 0.98 | 100.8% |
| Combined | 4102.8 to 15.6 | 1.02 (1.01–1.03) | -5.8 (-25.6–14.1) | 1.00 | 101.1% |
## Accuracy/Recovery
Assay recovery was evaluated using seven extracted stool samples containing various concentrations of calprotectin antigen covering the AMR of the assay. Extracts were spiked with calibrator material and then tested to calculate recovery results. For the samples with calprotectin concentrations lower than 200 mg/kg, Calibrator 2 was used as spiking material, while for samples with concentrations higher than 200 mg/kg, Calibrator 3 was used. Each sample was mixed with their correspondent calibrator material in a proportion of 9:1. Each sample, calibrator and spiked sample was tested in duplicate and recovery values were calculated. The results are presented in the table below:
| Sample | #1 | #2 | #3 | #4 | #5 | #6 | #7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Baseline (mg/kg) | 49.6 | 83.1 | 126.9 | 155.3 | 252.3 | 833.2 | 2501.6 |
| Spike Value (mg/kg) | 740.6 | 740.6 | 740.6 | 740.6 | 2624.4 | 2624.4 | 2624.4 |
| Theoretical (9:1) (Base+Spike) (mg/kg) | 118.7 | 148.8 | 188.2 | 213.8 | 489.5 | 1012.3 | 2513.9 |
| Observed (9:1) (Base+Spike) (mg/kg) | 128.3 | 141.9 | 202.3 | 212.7 | 518.4 | 1112 | 2380 |
| % Recovery | 108.10% | 95.40% | 107.50% | 99.50% | 105.90% | 109.80% | 94.70% |
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability: There is no international reference material for calprotectin. Calibrators and Controls are traceable to internal standards made from recombinant antigen.
{10}
11
# Stability
Reagent Stability: The study was done to support the shelf-life stability of the kit reagents (Beads, tracer, calibrators, low and high controls, extraction buffer, and special wash). Accelerated stability was performed using three lots of reagents at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for three weeks, where one week is equal to six months at $5 \pm 3^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$. The results support a stability claim up to 12 months at $5 \pm 3^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$.
Real-time reagent Stability: Real time stability testing was completed up to six months at the time of the submission. Additional real-time stability testing is ongoing.
In-use (onboard) Stability: The study was performed to determine the stability of reagents used over a period of time or for a number of assay runs. The results support calibrator stability for up to four calibrations over an eight hour period. The results support the claim that controls can be used up to 15 times. For reagent cartridges, the result support an in-use stability claim of 90 days. For Calprotectin Extraction Buffer diluted to 1X, the results support a stability claim of 90 days when stored at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$. For the special wash, the results support the QUANTA Flash Special wash onboard (in-use) stability claim of 30 days uncapped continuous use, or 720 hours distributed over 90 days onboard of the instrument.
Sample Stability: The stool stability claim for four days at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ was established by K160447 and acceptable because both devices use the same capture and detection antibodies. Further, the stability claim was up and supported by Walsham et.al., Clin. Exp. Gastroenterology, 2016; 9: 21-29.
Analyte Stability: The study was performed to determine the stability of extracted stool samples when stored at various temperatures. The study results support stability of extracts for 72 hours at room temperature; 24 days at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$; and up to three months at $-20^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$. The study results also supports extract stability up to five freeze-thaw cycles.
d. Detection limit:
The LoB was determined using four blank samples, using two different lots of reagents. Samples were run in replicates of five, for three days, for a total of 60 replicates per reagent lot. The LoB was determined at the $95^{\text{th}}$ percentile using the parametric method for one lot and the non-parametric method for the second lot. The LoB was determined to be $0.0 \, \mathrm{mg/kg}$.
The LoD was determined using four samples, two reagent lots, five replicates per run, for three days, consistent with CLSI EP17-A2 guideline with proportions of false positives (alpha) less than $5\%$ and false negatives (beta) less than $5\%$. The determination was based on 240 measurements, with 60 measurements on blank samples and 60 measurements of low level samples per reagent lot. LoD was
{11}
determined to be $2.4\mathrm{mg / kg}$
For determination of the LoQ, two low level samples were tested in replicates of five, on two reagent lots, once per day, for 3 days, obtaining 30 data points per sample to generate data used to calculate the LoQ for the QUANTA Flash Calprotectin assay. The LoQ was defined as the lowest concentration at which total imprecision was $<20\%$ . The LoQ for the QUANTA Flash Calprotectin assay was determined to be $16.1 \mathrm{mg/kg}$ , which has been set as the lower limit of the AMR.
# e. Analytical specificity:
Interference was performed according to CLSI EP07-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline - Second Edition. Six human stool specimens were tested, one high positive (1365.1 mg/kg), one moderately positive (664.7 mg/kg), one low positive (215.1 mg/kg), one near the cutoff (123.0 mg/kg), one in the indeterminate rage (62.2 mg/kg) and one negative (22.1 mg/kg). Interfering compounds were spiked into every specimen in 10% of total specimen volume, and the resulting samples were assessed in triplicates with the QUANTA Flash Calprotectin assay. Stool samples were tested for potential interference by:
Microorganisms: The data demonstrate that the results of the QUANTA Flash® Calprotectin was not affected by Yersinia ruckeri, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Shigella sonnei, Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli at 1.5x107 cfu/mL for each individual bacterial culture.
Drugs, Antibiotics, and Nutrients: The data demonstrate that the results of the QUANTA Flash® Calprotectin was not affected by the following oral pharmaceuticals: mesalamine (1.33 mg/50 mg stool), prednisone (0.01 mg/50 mg stool), vancomycin (0.67 mg/50 mg stool), gamma-tocopherol (0.0010 mg/50 mg stool), tacrolimus (0.07 mg/50 mg stool), beta-carotene (0.0048 mg/50 mg stool), ciprofloxacin (0.50 mg/50 mg stool), cholecalciferol (0.275 ng/50 mg stool), lansoprazole (lansoprazole 0.02 mg/50 mg stool), and ascorbic acid (0.05 mg/50 mg stool).
Others: The results demonstrate that the results of the QUANTA Flash® Calprotectin was not affected by the addition of Hemoglobin into the stool samples at 5.56mg/50mg stool.
# f. Assay cut-off:
| Concentration (mg/kg) | Interpretation |
| --- | --- |
| <50 | Negative |
| ≥50 – <120 | Intermediate |
| ≥120 | Positive |
{12}
13
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
A total of 137 samples including 48 samples from patients diagnosed with IBD (Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, Lymphocytic colitis), 89 patients diagnosed with IBS, chronic diarrhea, recurrent abdominal pain, Celiac disease, and gastritis were assayed with QUANTA Flash® Calprotectin and the predicate device QUANTA Lite Calprotectin Extended Range in accordance with the instruction for use in the package inserts. From these samples 77 samples were within the AMR of both devices, and were used to calculate agreement between the two devices. The regression analysis of the results comparing the QUANTA Flash® Calprotectin and QUANTA Lite Calprotectin Extended Range are shown below:
| N | Range (mg/kg) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | Correlation Coefficient |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 77 | 27.42–2865.12 | 1.10 (1.009-1.179) | 0.5165 (-9.469-14.03) | 0.956 |
| | Predicate (QUANTA Lite Calprotectin Extended Range) | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Indeterminate | Negative | Total |
| QUANTA Flash Calprotectin | Positive | 53 | 2 | 0 | 55 |
| | Borderline | 1 | 9 | 4 | 14 |
| | Negative | 0 | 1 | 67 | 68 |
| | Total | 54 | 12 | 71 | 137 |
| Borderline as positive: | | | | | |
| Positive agreement (95%CI): | 98.5% | (91.9–99.7) | | | |
| Negative agreement (95% CI): | 94.4% | (86.4–97.8) | | | |
| Total Agreement (95% CI): | 96.4% | (91.4–98.4) | | | |
| Indeterminate as negative: | | | | | |
| Positive agreement (95%CI): | 98.1% | (90.2–99.7) | | | |
| Negative agreement (95% CI): | 97.6% | (91.6–99.3) | | | |
| Total Agreement (95% CI): | 97.8% | (93.8–99.3) | | | |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical sensitivity and specificity:
{13}
Stool Samples from 165 individuals were collected for clinical validation of the QUANTA Flash Calprotectin device. Of these samples, 58 samples were from individuals diagnosed with IBD, 107 samples were from patients diagnosed with IBS and other diseases/conditions with gastrointestinal symptoms. Of the 58 IBD samples, 31 samples were from individuals with Crohn's disease, and 26 were from patients with Ulcerative Colitis, and one patient with Lymphocytic colitis. Among the non-IBD samples, 75 were from individuals diagnosed with IBS, 6 samples from patients diagnosed with Celiac Disease, 10 patients with chronic diarrhea, 5 patients with gastritis, 10 patients with Recurrent Abdominal Pain (RAP), and 1 patient with small intestine obstruction. The clinical performance was evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.
| Clinical Performance N=165 | Clinical Diagnosis | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | IBD | Controls | Total |
| QUANTA FLASH Calprotectin | Positive | 51 | 15 | 66 |
| | Indeterminate | 4 | 13 | 17 |
| | Negative | 2 | 80 | 82 |
| | Total | 57 | 108 | 165 |
| QUANTA Flash Calprotectin | Clinical Performance Characteristics (95% Confidence Interval) | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Indeterminate = Negative | Indeterminate = Positive |
| Sensitivity | 89.5% (78.9–95.1) | 96.5% (88.1–99.0) |
| Specificity | 86.1% (78.3–91.4) | 74.1% (65.1–81.4) |
| PPV | 77.3% (67.8–84.6) | 66.3% (58.7–73.1) |
| NPV | 93.9% (87.9–97.1) | 97.6% (91.1–99.4) |
# 4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
# 5. Expected values/Reference range:
Samples were collected from 164 apparently healthy individuals (95 females and 70 males, ages 17 to 89, with an average and median age of 44.9 and 42.0 years, respectively). With a positive cut-off of $120\mathrm{mg / kg}$ , all samples were negative with the QUANTA Flash Calprotectin. The mean concentration was $19.0\mathrm{mg / kg}$ , and the values ranged from $< 16.1$ to $49.2\mathrm{mg / kg}$ .
{14}
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
15
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.