The sponsor utilized a literature review of 18 international clinical studies to support the expansion of the DigniCap Scalp Cooling System's indications for use to include cancer patients with solid tumors. The data provided evidence on the incidence of chemotherapy-induced alopecia and safety profiles in real-world clinical settings.
Chemotherapy-induced alopecia; Solid tumors; Scalp cooling; Literature review; International clinical experience
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Hernández et al., 2016; Retrospective consecutive series; Follow-up/Duration: Not stated; Study Period: December 2010 - January 2015
204 patients with various solid tumors (breast, ovary, lung, etc.); Sample Size: 204; Number of Sites: 1 (ABC Medical Center, Mexico City)
Not applicable for this study
Hair loss (Dean scale)
Fehr et al., 2016; Non-randomized prospective; Follow-up/Duration: Not stated; Study Period: Not stated
Women with breast, endometrial, or ovarian cancer; Sample Size: 55; Number of Sites: 2 (Germany/Switzerland)
Not applicable for this study
Hair loss (WHO scale)
Indications for Use
The DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System is indicated to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced alopecia in cancer patients with solid tumors.
Device Story
DigniCap Scalp Cooling System reduces chemotherapy-induced alopecia in solid tumor patients. System comprises a refrigerated unit (Digni C3) circulating liquid coolant (monopropylene glycol) through a silicone inner cap (DigniCap) and an outer neoprene insulating cap (DigniTherm). Three integrated sensors monitor scalp temperature; system automatically adjusts coolant flow to maintain scalp temperature at -7 ± 2°C. Operated by clinical staff in oncology settings. Treatment requires a DigniCard key to initiate. Data logging and software updates performed via DigniStick. By inducing scalp hypothermia, the device reduces blood flow to hair follicles, potentially mitigating chemotherapy-induced hair loss. Effectiveness varies based on chemotherapy regimen, dose, and patient factors.
Clinical Evidence
Evidence includes 18 non-U.S. clinical evaluations and literature reviews. Studies were primarily single-arm, non-randomized, prospective, or retrospective, involving various solid tumor types and chemotherapy regimens. Success rates (defined as <50% hair loss) varied significantly across studies (range ~50% to 100%). Safety data noted potential risks of scalp metastases, particularly in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, colon, renal, ovarian, and bladder cancers. Adverse events included cold sensation, headache, and scalp pain. No long-term follow-up data regarding recurrence or metastasis risk is available.
Technological Characteristics
System includes a refrigerated unit (Digni C3) with touch screen control, silicone inner cap with two cooling circuits, neoprene outer cap (DigniTherm), and monopropylene glycol coolant (DigniCool). Features three temperature sensors for feedback control (accuracy ± 2.0°C). Connectivity via DigniStick for data export and software updates. Requires DigniCard for operation. Software-controlled cooling loop.
Indications for Use
Indicated for cancer patients with solid tumors to reduce chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Contraindicated in pediatric patients and adults with cold sensitivity, cold agglutinin disease, cryoglobulinemia, cryofibrinogenemia, cold urticaria, CNS malignancies (primary or metastatic), head/neck cancers, skin cancers (melanoma, squamous cell, Merkel cell), hematological malignancies treated with curative intent, solid tumors with high likelihood of metastases in transit, or patients scheduled for bone marrow ablation or skull irradiation.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A scalp cooling system to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced alopecia is a prescription device intended to reduce the frequency and severity of alopecia during chemotherapy in which alopecia-inducing chemotherapeutic agents are used.
Special Controls
*Classification* —Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device meets all design specifications and performance requirements, and that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. This information must include testing to demonstrate accuracy of the temperature control mechanism.
(2) Performance testing must demonstrate the electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety of the device.
(3) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
(4) The patient contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible. Material names must be provided.
(5) Labeling must include the following:
(i) A statement describing the potential risk of developing scalp metastasis.
(ii) Information on the patient population and chemotherapeutic agents/regimen for which the device has been demonstrated to be effective.
(iii) A summary of the non-clinical and/or clinical testing pertinent to use of the device.
(iv) A summary of the device technical parameters, including temperature cooling range and duration of cooling.
(v) A summary of the device- and procedure-related adverse events pertinent to use of the device.
(vi) Information on how the device operates and the typical course of treatment.
(6) Patient labeling must be provided and must include:
(i) Relevant contraindications, warnings, precautions, and adverse effects/complications.
(ii) Information on how the device operates and the typical course of treatment.
(iii) Information on the patient population for which there is clinical evidence of effectiveness.
(iv) The potential risks and benefits associated with use of the device.
(v) Postoperative care instructions.
(vi) A statement describing the potential risk of developing scalp metastasis.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles three human profiles facing to the right, with flowing lines beneath them.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
July 3, 2017
Dignitana AB % Mr. Michael Billig Experien Group, LLC 224 Airport Parkway. Suite 250 San Jose, California 95110
Re: K170871
Trade/Device Name: DigniCap Scalp Cooling System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4360 Regulation Name: Scalp Cooling System to Reduce the Likelihood of Chemotherapy Induced Alopecia Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PMC Dated: March 21, 2017 Received: March 23, 2017
Dear Mr. Billig:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Actinclude requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR
{1}------------------------------------------------
Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely.
# Jennifer R. Stevenson -S3
For Binita S. Ashar, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.S. Director Division of Surgical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K170871
Device Name DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System is indicated to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced alopecia in cancer patients with solid tumors.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
K170871 510(k) Notification DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System Page 1 of 15
#### 510(k) Summary (K170871)
## Applicant
Dignitana AB Traktorgränden 3 Lund, Sweden SE-226 60 Phone: +46 46 16 30 92 Fax: +46 46 16 30 99 Johan Ericsson, CEO johan.ericsson@dignitana.se
## Contact Person:
Michael J. Billig, CEO Experien Group LLC Regulatory Consultant to Dignitana AB 224 Airport Parkway, Suite 250 San Jose, CA 95110 Tel: (408) 400-0856 Fax: (408) 400-0865 mjb@experiengroup.com
### Date of Summary: June 20, 2017
| Device Proprietary Name | DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System | | |
|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------------|
| Common/Usual Name | Scalp Cooling System | | |
| Classification Names /<br>Numbers and Code | 21 CFR | Classification Name | Product Code |
| | 878.4360 | Scalp Cooling System | PMC |
| Regulatory Class | II | | |
| Prescription Status | Prescription Device | | |
| Device / Classification<br>Panel | General & Plastic Surgery | | |
| Predicate Device | DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System DEN150010 | | |
| Description of Device | The DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System consists of a computer<br>controlled system that includes a refrigerated tank containing the<br>liquid coolant that is maintained at -7 $\pm$ 2°C. The coolant<br>circulates from the cooling unit to and through the channels of the<br>cap and back to the cooling unit. The scalp temperature is<br>monitored by three separate sensors. Deviations from the<br>treatment temperature are automatically adjusted by the system<br>(scalp temperature can be controlled with an accuracy of $\pm$ 2.0°C).<br>The DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System components include the<br>following: | | |
{4}------------------------------------------------
| Description of Device (cont.) | Digni C3 – Is a refrigerator unit with an integral control system<br>operated via a touch screen and is capable of controlling two<br>separate DigniCap® Cooling caps independently of each other.<br>Scalp cooling is performed in conjunction with a silicone inner<br>cap (DigniCap®), an outer neoprene cap (DigniTherm), and the<br>liquid coolant (DigniCool). |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | DigniCap® – A soft, tight-fitting silicone cap which has two<br>separate cooling circuits, one for the front and one for the back of<br>the head. Each cooling circuit is equipped with a temperature<br>sensor, and the cap is also equipped with a third sensor for safety<br>control. The cap is available in different sizes. |
| | DigniCool - The liquid coolant monopropylene glycol. |
| | DigniTherm - The outer neoprene cap that insulates and keeps<br>the inner cap in place. This neoprene cover cap, called the<br>DigniTherm, comes in different sizes and is colored coded to<br>match the corresponding DigniCap® Cooling cap. |
| | DigniStick- A component used to save data from a treatment or<br>for troubleshooting. It can also be used to update software. |
| | DigniCard - A key card which has to be inserted in order to start<br>a treatment. |
| Indications for Use | The DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System is indicated to reduce the<br>likelihood of chemotherapy-induced alopecia in cancer patients<br>with solid tumors. |
### Limitations
The sale, distribution, and use of DigniCap™ Scalp Cooling System are restricted to prescription use in accordance with 21 CFR 801.109.
Limitations on device use are also achieved through the following statements included in the instructions for use:
## Contraindications
The use of Dignicap is contraindicated in pediatric patients.
The use of Dignicap is contraindicated in adult patients with:
- cold sensitivity,
- cold agglutinin disease, ●
- cryoglobulinemia ●
- cryofibrinogenemia. ●
- Cold urticaria
- CNS malignancies (either primary or metastatic),
- squamous cell carcinoma of the lung,
- small cell carcinoma of the lung,
- cancers of the head and neck, ●
- skin cancers including melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and Merkel cell ● carcinoma.
- hematological malignancies treated with curative intent by chemotherapy ●
{5}------------------------------------------------
K170871 510(k) Notification DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System Page 3 of 15
- solid tumor malignancies with a high likelihood of metastases in transit.
- patients who are scheduled for bone marrow ablation chemotherapy
- patients who are scheduled to undergo skull irradiation ●
- patients who have previously received skull irradiation
#### Warnings
Scalp and/or cutaneous metastases have been reported in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, colon cancer, renal cell carcinoma, ovarian cancer, and bladder cancer. Patients with advanced forms of these cancers may be more likely to experience scalp metastases with the scalp cooling svstem.
Use of Scalp Cooling in the palliative setting in patients with metastatic cancer may also increase the risk for scalp metastases.
Use of scalp cooling with taxanes plus anthracyclines when used in combination has not been shown to be successful in preventing chemotherapeutic drug induced alopecia. Dignicap® Scalp Cooling System should not be used in these patients.
Scalp radiation can cause stenosis of small cutaneous vessels decreasing device effectiveness.
The effectiveness of this device in patients who have received previous chemotherapy has not been evaluated.
The risk of scalp-cooling may outweigh the benefits in patients receiving chemotherapeutic agents with low incidence of inducing alopecia.
Long-term effects of scalp-cooling and risk of scalp metastasis have not been fully studied.
Clinical studies have demonstrated variable success rates in patient reduction of chemotherapy induced alopecia with scalp cooling since the outcome is dependent on multiple factors including chemotherapy regimen, dose, duration of drug infusion, chemotherapy drug metabolism, and concomitant comorbidities. Data have shown that women who experience hair loss in spite of using scalp cooling might have worse quality of life than women who did not have scalp cooling.
#### Comparison to Predicate Devices
Aside from the change in the Indications for Use, the DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System is identical in technological characteristics, design and performance to the predicate.
#### Summary of Testing
#### Pre-clinical Testing
No additional testing was conducted for this 510(k) to support substantial equivalence. The device in this submission is identical to the previously cleared device, as the purpose of this application was for the expansion of the treatment population only. Testing of the predicate device included biocompatibility, shelf-life, shipping and packaging, electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety, software, bench testing, and two clinical studies. All tests met the pre-determined specifications and acceptance criteria and demonstrated the DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System to be safe and effective as labeled.
{6}------------------------------------------------
K170871 510(k) Notification DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System Page 4 of 15
#### Clinical Data
The efficacy of scalp cooling with the DigniCap System has been reported in 18 clinical evaluations outside of the U.S. These studies investigated the effects of scalp cooling on the incidence of alopecia in patients with various malignancies using a variety of chemotherapy regimens in both the adjuvant and palliative settings. Efficacy has best been demonstrated in chemotherapy regimens containing docetaxel, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, and/or carboplatin. These studies did not have long term follow up, and were single armed non-randomized prospective studies. Long-term effects of scalp-cooling and scalp metastasis have not been fully studied in the adjuvant setting outside of stage I and II breast cancer. It is not clear whether there is increased risk of recurrence, particularly scalp or skull metastases, based on the data available. Some of the studies did not list the names of the solid tumor malignancies or their frequencies.
A literature review was conducted to address the safety and effectiveness of the DigniCap device. A search in PubMed, EMBASE, Clinical Trial register and Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database - (MAUDE) was performed using the following search terms: DigniCap, Digni and scalp, Digni and alopecia, Digni and hypothermia, and Dignitana. Abstracts and peer reviewed articles (Table 1) of clinical trials covering the majority of the relevance and methodology questions in the appraisal plan of the pivotal clinical evaluation report were selected. Due to the literature review method and the design of these studies, safety and effectiveness results presented in these studies may not be accurate.
Based on the above published data there is insufficient evidence to assess long term effect. Use of DigniCap Scalp Cooling System in these patients may increase the risk of scalp metastasis, metastasis elsewhere in the body or impact the natural course of the disease
#### Conclusion
The DigniCap Cooling System described in this application is unchanged from the device approved in DEN150010. This application is limited to a revision of the indication for use. The clinical data described in the literature documents provided in this application do demonstrate that the DigniCap Cooling System can be used to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced alopecia in cancer patients with solid tumors.
{7}------------------------------------------------
# Table 1
# Clinical Data with the DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System Outside of U.S.
| Publication<br>(author, year,<br>institution) | Type of study<br>(RCT, retrospective,<br>single arm<br>prospective<br>nonrandomized<br>studies.) | Treatment group | Control group | Sample size | Length of<br>Follow- up | Follow-up schedule | Completed Cooling<br>% | % Success with<br><50% hair loss | List of Adverse<br>Events | Reason for<br>discontinuation<br>of cooling |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Hernández et al., 2016<br>American British<br>Cowdray, ABC Medical<br>Center, Mexico City | Retrospective<br>Consecutive series of<br>patients;<br>December 2010 -<br>January 2015. | Weekly TX for 12 cycles<br>(n=4).<br>Weekly TX for 12 cycles and<br>AC every 3 weeks for 4-6<br>cycles (n=66).<br>AC every 3 weeks for 6-8<br>cycles (n=28). | N/A | 204 patients with<br>Stage I-V breast<br>(n=120), ovary,<br>lung, uterus,<br>esophagus,<br>prostate, chest,<br>urethra, rectum,<br>larynx, bladder,<br>colon, liver cancer<br>and non-Hodgkin´s<br>lymphoma. | Not stated | Hair loss - Photos<br>Dean scale | 72% (98/120) | 84% (82/98) | At follow-up:<br>no side effects<br>or scalp<br>metastasis<br>present. | Hair loss. |
| Fehr et al., 2016<br>1. Clinic of Kempten-<br>Oberallgäu, Germany<br>2. Cantonal Hospital<br>Frauenfeld, Switzerland | Non randomized<br>prospective | PT 175 mg/m2 and<br>carboplatin 6 AUC (area<br>under the curve) for 6 three-<br>week cycles [n = 12 (22%)]<br>D 60 mg/m2 and C 600<br>mg/m2 for 4 three-week<br>cycles, followed by DT 100<br>mg/m2 for 4 three-week<br>cycles [n = 11 (20%)]<br>E 90 mg/m2 and C 600<br>mg/m2 for 4 three-week<br>cycles, followed by PT 80<br>mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks<br>[n = 10 (18%)]<br>PT 80 mg/m2 weekly for 16<br>weeks [n = 8 (15%)]<br>DT 75 mg/m2 and C 500<br>mg/m2 for 4 three-week<br>cycles [n = 6 (11%)]<br>F 500 mg/m2, E 100 mg/m2,<br>and C 500 mg/m2 for 3 three-<br>week cycles, followed by DT<br>100 mg/m2 for 3 three-week<br>cycles [n = 64 (7%)]<br>DT 75 mg/m2, D 50 mg/m2,<br>and C 500 mg/m2 for 6<br>three-week cycles [n = 4 (7%) | N/A | Women with breast,<br>endometrial, or<br>ovarian cancer<br>(n=55)<br>Breast cancer<br>35adjuvant,<br>5 palliative,<br>2 neo- adjuvant<br>Ovarian cancer 12<br>(22%)<br>Endometrial cancer<br>1 patient (1.8%) | Not stated | Photographs of the<br>patient's head from<br>5 different views.<br>WHO scale.<br>Grade 0: no hair loss<br>Grade 1: minimal<br>hair loss (>0% to<br>25%).<br>Corresponds to<br>Dean score 0 and 1. | 78% (43/55) | 56% (28/50)<br>(up to 25% hair<br>loss) | 1.8% (1/55)<br>could not<br>tolerate scalp<br>cooling. | Hair loss (n=7),<br>death (n=3),<br>change of treatment<br>centre (n=1),<br>and doubts about<br>study participation<br>resulting in withdrawal<br>of consent within 30<br>minutes of initiation of<br>the 1st cycle (n=1). |
| Publication<br>(author, year,<br>institution) | Type of study<br>(RCT, retrospective,<br>single arm<br>prospective<br>nonrandomized<br>studies. | Treatment group | Control group | Sample size | Length of<br>Follow- up | Follow-up schedule | Completed Cooling<br>% | % Success with<br><50% hair loss | List of Adverse<br>Events | Reason for<br>discontinuation<br>of cooling |
| Drinkut et al., 2016<br>Medizinische<br>Hochschule Hannover,<br>Klinik für<br>Frauenheilkunde und<br>Geburtshilfe, Hannover,<br>Germany | Non randomized<br>prospective<br>June 2014 - February<br>2016 | 4 x E/C 90/600 mg/m2 + 12 x<br>PT 80 mg/m2 | N/A | Women with breast<br>cancer (n=34) | Not stated | Quantification of<br>hair loss by patients<br>and nursing staff.<br>Photos. | 56% (19/34) | 100%<br>(Patient<br>assessm.: all<br><50% hair loss,<br>Nurses<br>assessm.: all<br><25% hair loss) | Not stated<br>(>50% of<br>patients did not<br>report any side<br>effects.) | Cold sensation (n=6)<br>Other (n=9) |
| Schaffrin-Nabe et al.,<br>2016<br>Gemeinschaftspraxis<br>Bochum, Germany | Non randomized<br>prospective | Neo-adjuvant EC-PT | Neo-adjuvant<br>EC-PT | Breast cancer<br>patients (n=40)<br>Scalp cooled (n=32),<br>controls (n=8) | Not stated | Hair-mass- index<br>(trichometer)<br>No visible hair loss<br>was considered<br>treatment success. | 100% (32/32) | 63% (20/32)<br>(no visible hair<br>loss)<br>Complete hair<br>loss in controls. | Not stated. | N/A |
| Traub et al., 2016<br>Agaplesion Markus<br>Krankenhaus Frankfurt<br>am Main, Germany | Non randomized<br>prospective<br>October 2015 - | 4 × EC → 12 × PT (n = 7)<br>4 × PT → 4 × EC (n = 1)<br>4 × EC (n = 1)<br>18 × PT Mono (n = 1)<br>4 × Nab-PT Mono (n = 1)<br>18 × PT plus Myocet (n = 1) | N/A | Women with breast<br>cancer (n=12) | Not stated | Objective<br>assessment of<br>photographs. | 75% (9/12) | 75% (9/12)<br>(<20% hair loss) | Cooling-<br>induced side<br>effects | Hair loss (n=1),<br>or cooling-induced<br>side effects (n=2) |
| Campennì et al., 2016<br>European Institute<br>Oncology, Milan | Non randomized<br>prospective | EC<br>EC-TX +/- Trastuzumab<br>TC | N/A | Patients with stage I-<br>III breast cancer<br>receiving adjuvant<br>chemotherapy<br>(n=109). | Not stated | Hair loss<br>Patient self-<br>assessment &<br>assessment by<br>treating physician<br>Dean scale | 79% (86/109) | 77% (84/109) | Headaches and<br>coldness.<br>No serious<br>adverse events. | Hair loss (n=12),<br>Discomfort during the<br>cooling period (n=4),<br>other reasons (n=7). |
{8}------------------------------------------------
{9}------------------------------------------------
K170871 510(k) Notification DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System
Page 7 of 15
| Publication<br>(author, year,<br>institution) | Type of study<br>(RCT, retrospective,<br>single arm<br>prospective<br>nonrandomized<br>studies.) | Treatment group | Control group | Sample size | Length of<br>Follow- up | Follow-up schedule | Completed Cooling<br>% | % Success with<br><50% hair loss | List of Adverse<br>Events | Reason for<br>discontinuation<br>of cooling |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Schaffrin-Nabe et al.,<br>2015<br>Gemeinschafts praxis<br>für Hämatologie und<br>Onkologie Bochum,<br>Germany | Non randomized<br>prospective | E 90 mg/m² + C 3w→PT w<br>E 90 mg/m² + C 2w→ PT w<br>E 90 mg/m2 + C 3w ->DT 100<br>mg/m²<br>F + E 100 mg/m² + C<br>F + E 90 mg/m² + C<br>DT 75 mg/m² Carboplatin<br>AUC6<br>F + E 100 mg/m² + C → DT<br>100 mg/m²<br>E 150 mg/m² + PT 225<br>mg/m² + C 2000 mg/m²<br>DT 75 mg/m² + A50 C 500<br>mg/m² PT 100 mg/m² +<br>Carboplatin AUC2<br>Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² +<br>Carboplatin AUC2<br>DT 75 mg/m2 + C 600 mg/m2 | N/A | In total 226 cancer<br>patients with solid<br>tumors.<br>Breast cancer<br>receiving (neo)<br>adjuvant and<br>palliative<br>chemotherapy<br>(n=136). | Not stated | Hair loss, common<br>toxicity criteria (CTC<br>German version 1.0)<br>scale for alopecia.<br>No or not visible hair<br>loss, CTC 0-1. | 3.1% (7/226) | 65%<br>(no or not<br>visible hair loss,<br>CTC 0-1.) | Slight and well<br>tolerable<br>sensation of<br>cold and mild<br>cranial<br>pressure. No<br>skin irritations<br>recorded. | Cold intolerance and<br>aversion. |
| Andrews et al., 2014<br>Patricia Ritchie Centre,<br>the Mater Hospital<br>Sydney, Australia | Prospective feasibility | AC or combination<br>FEC or FEC-D<br>TC<br>Other | N/A | Early stage breast<br>cancer (n=122) | Not stated | Completion rate<br>Hair loss: Dean score | 80.5% (98/122) | 50% (61/122) | Not stated | Adverse events not<br>listed specifically for<br>patients using the<br>DigniCap. |
{10}------------------------------------------------
K170871 510(k) Notification DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System
Page 8 of 15
| Publication<br>(author, year,<br>institution) | Type of study<br>(RCT, retrospective,<br>single arm<br>prospective<br>nonrandomized<br>studies.) | Treatment group | Control group | Sample size | Length of<br>Follow- up | Follow-up schedule | Completed Cooling<br>% | % Success with<br><50% hair loss | List of Adverse<br>Events | Reason for<br>discontinuation<br>of cooling |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Friedrich and<br>Carstensen, 2014<br>Mammazentrum,<br>Jerusalem Hospital,<br>Hamburg, Germany | Non randomized<br>prospective<br>June 2011-December<br>2012 | Multiple combinations<br>(Neo-) adjuvant<br>chemotherapy<br>E 90 mg/m² + C 600 mg/m²<br>(q3w*4) → DT 100/175<br>mg/m² (q3w*4)<br>F 500 mg/m2 + E 100 mg/m²<br>+ C 500 mg/m² (q3w*6)<br>F 500 mg/m2 + E 100 mg/m²<br>+ C 500 mg/m² (q3w*6) →<br>DT 100 mg/m2 (q3w*3)<br>E 90 mg/m² + C 600 mg/m²<br>(q3w*4)<br>CarboplaPt/DT (q3w*6)<br>Palliative chemotherapy<br>Taxol 135/Herceptin 8mg/kg<br>Halaven 1.23<br>Taxol 90 Avastin 10mg/kg<br>Carboplatin<br>Gemcitabine/Cisplatin | N/A | Breast cancer<br>(n=83)<br>Adjuvant (n=58)<br>Palliative (n=6)<br>Drop outs (n=19) | Not stated | Hair loss: Photo<br>documentation<br>Numerical VAS (1-<br>10) | 77%<br>(64/83 finished<br>chemotherapy and<br>scalp cooling.) | 52.6% | Feeling of cold<br>Headaches<br>Heaviness of<br>head<br>Scalp pain<br>Frequency<br>differed<br>between<br>patients with<br>(neo-) adjuvant<br>and palliative<br>CT | Out of 19 patients;<br>hair loss (n=5),<br>Cancer related<br>emergency cases or<br>disease progression<br>(n=3),<br>Feeling of<br>cold/headaches (n=2),<br>Unspecified<br>intolerance (n=9). |
| Publication<br>(author, year,<br>institution) | Type of study<br>(RCT, retrospective,<br>single arm<br>prospective<br>nonrandomized<br>studies.) | Treatment group | Control group | Sample size | Length of<br>Follow- up | Follow-up schedule | Completed Cooling<br>% | % Success with<br><50% hair loss | List of Adverse<br>Events | Reason for<br>discontinuation<br>of cooling |
| Udrea et al., 2014<br>Medisprof Oncology day<br>hospital, Cluj, Romania | Non randomized<br>prospective<br>March 2012 -<br>November 2013 | E 100mg/m2 + C 600 mg/m2<br>(n=53)<br>DT 100 mg/m² (n=10)<br>PT 175 mg/m² + carboplatin<br>AUC5-6 (n=21)<br>Irinotecan 80 mg/m2 (n=4),<br>Etoposide 100 mg/m² day 1-<br>3 + Carboplatin AUC5 (n=3)<br>TXT 75 mg/m² (n=2)<br>DT 75 mg/m² + Cisplatine 75<br>mg/m² + Capecitabine 1000<br>mg/m² (n=2)<br>Other combinations (n=13) | N/A | 108 cancer patients<br>(Treatment ongoing<br>for 8 patients). | Not stated | Hair loss: US NCI<br>(CTCAE) v4.0.<br>No alopecia / crown<br>like alopecia | 96% (104/108) | 57% (62/108)<br>(No alopecia /<br>crown like<br>alopecia) | Not stated | Discomfort (n=4) |
| Meunier et al., 2013<br>1) Service de<br>chimiothérapie, Clinique<br>Charcot, Lyon, France<br>2) Centre Alexis Vautrin,<br>Nancy, France<br>3) Jerusalem<br>Krankenhaus<br>Mammazentrum<br>Hamburg, Germany | Non randomized<br>prospective<br>multicenter | (Neo-) adjuvant<br>chemotherapy<br>4 E90 C600 + 4 Taxotere<br>(n=26)<br>3 FEC100 + 3 Taxotere (n=10)<br>6 FEC 100 (n=15)<br>4 T75C600 +/- Trastuzumab<br>(n=7)<br>Taxane +/-anthracyclines<br>(n=11)<br>Palliative chemotherapy<br>Paclitaxel, Eribuline, Carbo +<br>cisplatin, gemcitabine (n=6) | N/A<br>(Comparison 3<br>versus 8<br>degrees C) | Cancer patients<br>(total n=133).<br>Breast cancer<br>(n=75)<br>(Neo) adjuvant<br>(n=69)<br>Palliative (n=6). | Not stated | Hair loss: Patient<br>self- assessment<br>VAS 0-100, with 100<br>being total hair<br>preservation.<br>(success: keeping<br>60-100% of hair) | 44.6% | (neo) adjuvant:<br>65%<br>Palliative: 83% | Headaches<br>(22%)<br>Cold sensation<br>or pain to the<br>scalp (4%) | Intolerance (9%)<br>Headaches (9%)<br>Unknown (9%)<br>Hair loss (22%)<br>Stopped<br>chemo/disease<br>progression (9%) |
| Publication<br>(author, year,<br>institution) | Type of study<br>(RCT, retrospective,<br>single arm<br>prospective<br>nonrandomized<br>studies.) | Treatment group | Control group | Sample size | Length of<br>Follow- up | Follow-up schedule | Completed Cooling<br>% | % Success with<br><50% hair loss | List of Adverse<br>Events | Reason for<br>discontinuation<br>of cooling |
| Ekwall et al., 2013<br>Örebro University<br>Hospital,<br>Örebro, Sweden | Randomized<br>prospective | PT (175 mg/m2) +<br>carboplatin (AUC 5-6) | N/A | Gynecological<br>cancer (total n=43);<br>Ovarian cancer<br>(n=22)<br>Endometrial cancer<br>(n=17)<br>Cervical cancer<br>(n=2)<br>Tubal cancer (n=1)<br>Peritoneal cancer<br>(n=1) | Not stated | Hair loss: Photo<br>documentation as<br>assessed by two<br>Investigators<br>VAS (0-10) as<br>assessed by the<br>patients | 91% (43/47) | 51% | Scalp cooling<br>was generally<br>very well<br>tolerated.<br>Headaches<br>VAS ≤ 1<br>Coldness<br>VAS ≤ 3.4 | Anaphylactic reactions,<br>peripheral neuropathy<br>and regimen<br>modification. |
| Abramov et al., 2011<br>N.N. Blokhin Russian<br>Center Research,<br>Chemo- therapy and<br>combined treatment<br>Moscow. Russian<br>federation | Non randomized<br>prospective | ANR (n=5)<br>TX (n=8)<br>ANR+TX (n=7) | N/A | Breast cancer<br>(n=20) | Not stated | Hair loss: CTCAE<br>v3.0 Grade 1:<br>(thinning or patchy) | Not stated. | 100%<br>ANR: 100% no<br>hair loss<br>TX: 50% no hair<br>loss, 50% grade<br>1<br>ANR+TX: 29%<br>no hair loss,<br>71% Grade 1 | Not stated | N/A |
| Kato et al., 2011<br>Kato Breast Clinic, Shiga,<br>Japan | Non randomized<br>prospective<br>August 2007- October<br>2010 | PT 60 mg/m2 weekly + C 400<br>mg/m2 (n=252)<br>PT+ H (n=29)<br>E 40 mg/m2 biweekly+ C 400<br>mg/m2 (n=54)<br>Other combinations (n=24)<br>(Combination by 5FU, CPT-<br>11, Gemcitabine and<br>CBDCA.) | N/A | Breast cancer<br>(n=359) | Not stated | Modified WHO scale<br>(Grade 1-5)<br>Success defined as<br><30% hair loss.<br>Photos | Not stated | 96% | No abnormal<br>scalp sensation<br>or headaches<br>during or after<br>treatment.<br>No scalp<br>metastasis. | N/A |
| Byahov et al., 2006<br>Semashko Central<br>Clinical Hospital,<br>Moscow, Russia | Non randomized<br>prospective | ANR (n=43)<br>Non-ANR (n=34) | N/A | Breast cancer,<br>ovarian cancer,<br>colorectal cancer<br>(total n=77) | Not stated | Hair loss CTCAE v 3.0 | Not stated | ANR: 79%<br>Non-ANR: 94% | Well tolerated<br>by all patients. | N/A |
| Publication<br>(author, year,<br>institution) | Type of study<br>(RCT,<br>retrospective,<br>single arm<br>prospective<br>nonrandomized<br>studies.) | Treatment group | Control<br>group | Sample size | Length of<br>Follow- up | Follow-up<br>schedule | Completed<br>Cooling % | % Success<br>with<br><50% hair<br>loss | List of<br>Adverse<br>Events | Reason for<br>discontinuation<br>of cooling |
| Ridderheim et al.,<br>2003<br>Lund University<br>Hospital, Sweden | Non randomized<br>prospective pilot | PT 175 mg/m²,<br>Carboplatin AUC 5<br>PT 175 mg/m², E 75<br>mg/m2, Carboplatin AUC<br>ട<br>DT 100 mg/m²<br>PT 175 mg/m²<br>Gemcitabine 1,000<br>mg/m² day 1+8, E 75<br>mg/m² day 1<br>E 60 mg/m², C 600<br>mg/m², 5-FU 600 mg/m²<br>D 50 mg/m², Cisplatin 50<br>mg/m²<br>E 50 mg/m², Carboplatin<br>AUC 5<br>Vinorelbine 30 mg/m²<br>D 25 mg/m²<br>Bleomycin 10,000 E/m²<br>Vinblastin 6 mg/m²<br>Darcabazin 375 mg/m²<br>Bleomycin 30,000 day 1,<br>5, 16<br>Etoposide 100 mg/m²<br>day 1-5<br>Cisplatin 20 mg/m² day<br>1—5<br>Topotecan 1.0 mg/m²<br>day 1-5<br>Etoposide 50 mg/day 6-<br>12<br>Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² | | In total 74 cancer<br>patients<br>Ovarian cancer<br>(n=60)<br>Hodgkin´s<br>Lymphoma (n=8)<br>Breast cancer<br>(n=3)<br>Endometrial<br>cancer (n=2)<br>Sarcoma (n=1) | 15 months<br>(range 3-44). | Hair loss:<br>Photo<br>documentation<br>Numerical VAS<br>(0-10) | 97% (72/74) | Minimal to<br>no hair loss in<br>ANR or TX<br>treated<br>patients.<br>Median hair<br>loss was VAS<br>6 (range 1.5-<br>8) in patients<br>treated when<br>combining<br>ANR and TX. | Discomfort<br>was modest<br>(median<br>value 1.5;<br>range 0.5-8).<br>No presence<br>of scalp<br>metastases | Discomfort |
| Publication<br>(author, year,<br>institution) | Type of study<br>(RCT,<br>retrospective,<br>single arm<br>prospective<br>nonrandomized<br>studies.) | Treatment group | Control<br>group | Sample size | Length of<br>Follow- up | Follow-up<br>schedule | Completed<br>Cooling % | % Success<br>with<br><50% hair<br>loss | List of<br>Adverse<br>Events | Reason for<br>discontinuation<br>of cooling |
| Henriksen et al.,<br>2003<br>Herlev Hospital,<br>University of<br>Copenhagen<br>Denmark | Non randomized<br>prospective interim | Seven cycles of FEC<br>(Adjuvant). Dose not<br>stated. | N/A | Breast cancer<br>(n=26) | Not stated | Hair loss:<br>Patients self-<br>assessment<br>Clinical photos<br>Numerical VAS,<br>wig use<br>Side effects:<br>Numerical VAS<br>Post-treatment<br>questionnaire | Not stated | 88% success<br>rate,<br>23/26<br>patients<br>choose not to<br>use a wig. | Side effects<br>and extra<br>time<br>accepted by<br>the patients. | N/A |
| Lundgren et al., 1999<br>Umeå University<br>Hospital & Lund<br>University Hospital,<br>Sweden | Non randomized<br>prospective pilot | PT 135-175 mg/m2 (n=3)<br>DT 100 mg/ m2 (n=3)<br>FEC (n=2)<br>CMF (n=1) | PT | Ovarian cancer<br>(n=3)<br>Breast cancer<br>(n=6)<br>Ovarian cancer<br>control (n=2) | Not stated | Hair loss:<br>Numerical VAS (1-<br>10) assessed by<br>independent<br>observers.<br>Discomfort<br>assessed by the<br>patients. | 100% | Scalp cooled<br>patients:<br>100%<br>Controls: 0%<br>(Minimal to<br>no hair loss<br>(VAS < 2.5) in<br>all scalp<br>cooled<br>patients.) | Discomfort<br>level initially<br>low (mean<br>VAS 3) and<br>decreased<br>after 10 min<br>(mean VAS<br>1.5).<br>No presence<br>of scalp<br>metastases | N/A |
{11}------------------------------------------------
{12}------------------------------------------------
K170871 510(k) Notification
DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System
Page 10 of 15
{13}------------------------------------------------
{14}------------------------------------------------
# K170871 510(k) Notification DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System
Page 12 of 15
DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System
{15}------------------------------------------------
K170871 510(k) Notification DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System Page 13 of 15
#### Chemotherapy and Abbreviations
ANR: anthracyclines
H: Herceptin
TCH: docetaxel + carboplatin + trastuzumab
AC: doxorubin + cyclophosphamide
M: methotrexate TC: docetaxel + cyclophosphamide
C: cyclophosphamide
D: doxorubicin
DT: docetaxel
E: epirubicin
F: 5-fluorouracil
Mi: mitoxanthrone
PT: paclitaxel
TX: taxanes
Vc: vincristine
{16}------------------------------------------------
#### Bibliography:
- 1. Lundgren-Eriksson,L,etal."Totalpreventionoftacoi-induced alopecia by a new model of cold cap(dignitana)."The European Journal of Cancer. Vol. 35, Supp. 4. September 1999.
- 2. Henriksen.T.etal."Advanced.computerizedcoldcapforpreventing chemotherapy induced alopecia."The European Journal of Cancer. Vol. 1, No. 5. September 2003. S369.
- 3. Ridderheim,M,etal."Scalphypothermiatopreventcherapy-induced alopecia is effective and safe: A pilot study oif a new difitized scalp-cooling system used in 74 patients. Support Care Cancer. Vol. 11. 2003. 371-377.
- 4. Byahov.MandOShevlev."Alopeciapreventioninchemotherapypatients.Methodof controlledscalpcooling."Meditsinskaya Cartoteka.2006.
- 5. Kato.M.etal."EvaluationofDigniCap System for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-induced Hair LossinBreastCancerPatient."St. Gallen Oncology Conference. 2011.
- 6. Abramov,MandSemenova,I."CoolingoftheScalptoPreventAnticancerChemotherapy- induced Alopecia."Poster.
- 7. Ekwall, E, et al."Determinationofthemosteffectivecoolingtemperaturefortheprevention of chemotherapy-inducedalopecia." Molecular and Clinical Oncology. Vol. 1. 2013. 1071.
- 8. Meunier,A,etal."Evaluationdelatoléranceetdel'efficacitéd'uncasqueàrefrigeration continue (DIGNICAP)danslapréventiondel'alopéciechimio-induite."(Translationfrom French). Presented at the Society For Science-Based Medicine , 2013.
- 9. Udrea.A. "Scalpcoolingsystemingchemotherapy-induced alopecia: a pilot study on 108 patients -a Romanian oncology -dayhospitalexperience."Medisprof Oncology. Psycho-Oncology 23 (Suppl. 3):169-254 (2014), P1-0062.
- 10. Friedrichs,KandMCarstensen. "Successfulreductionofalopeciainducedbyanthracycline and taxane containing adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer -clinical evaluation of sensorcontrolledscalpcooling."SPrignerPlus. Vol. 3, No. 500 2014. 1-7.
- 11. Andrews.K.etal. "CrowningGlory:Isthatthewholestory?Implementingscalpcoolingin an Australian setting." Poster presentation at Cancer Nurses Society of Australia, 17th winter congress, 2014.
- 12. Schaffrin-Nabe,D.etal. "Theinfluenceofvariousparametersonthesuccessofsensor- controlled scalp cooling in preventing chemotherapy-inducedalopecia."Oncology Research and Treatment. Vol. 38. 2015. 489-495.
- 13. Drinkut,K.etal."coolHAIR-scalp cooling to prevent chemotherapy-inducedalopecia." (Translation from German). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkunde 2016:76-P171.
- 14. Schaffrin-Nabe,D,etal."Hair-mass-Index (HMI) as indicator for the efficacy oif scalp cooling(SC)andtheassociatedqualityoflife." Journal of Clinical Oncology. 34. 2016. (suppl: abstr e21692)
- 15. Traub,L,etal."EfficacyandsideeffectsoftheDigniCap®systemtopreventcytostaticinduced alopecia."(TranslationfromGerman).Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkunde 2016:76-P068
- 16. Campenni,GM,etal."Preventingchemotherapy-induced alopecia by scalp cooling: preliminary data from a study on the efficacy and safety of dignicap® system in breast cancer patients."Ann Oncol. Vol. 27. Supp. 4. 2016. iv63-iv64.
- 17. Fehr,MK,etal. "Sensor-controlled scalp cooling to prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia in
{17}------------------------------------------------
K170871 510(k) Notification DigniCap® Scalp Cooling System Page 15 of 15
femalecancerpatients."Current Oncology. Vol. 23, No. 6. December 2016. e576-e582.
- 18. Hernández R.E. et al., Experience at the ABC Medical Center of Mexico City, 2010-2015, using the scalp cooling system DigniCap® for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Poster 850794 at the San Antonio Breast…
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.