HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H), HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls
Applicant
Instrumentation Laboratory CO
Product Code
LCO · Hematology
Decision Date
Sep 8, 2017
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 864.7695
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K170854 · Sep 8, 2017
HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H), HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls
Instrumentation Laboratory CO
Retrospective clinical plasma samples from hospitalized patients
Retrospective clinical samples were used to perform ROC analysis for cut-off determination and to conduct a multicenter method comparison study against the SRA reference method and a predicate device.
Retrospective clinical samples; ROC analysis; Method comparison; HIT suspected population
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
ROC Analysis for Cut-off Determination; Retrospective analysis of clinical samples
Hospitalized patients exposed to heparin with clinical signs consistent with HIT; Sample Size: 87
Patients exposed to heparin showing HIT-related symptoms; Sample Size: 802 (vs predicate); 790 (vs SRA); Number of Sites: 3
Zymutest HIA IgG (predicate) and Serotonin Release Assay (SRA)
Positive Percent Agreement (PPA), Negative Percent Agreement (NPA), Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
Indications for Use
HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) is a qualitative, fully automated, chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) for the detection of IgG antibodies that react with Platelet Factor 4 (PF4) when complexed to heparin. The assay is for use in human 3.2% or 3.8% citrated plasma and serum on the ACL AcuStar instrument in a laboratory setting. The result provided by the assay should be interpreted as either positive or negative based on the assay cut-off (1.00 U/mL). The positive or negative result aids in determining the risk for heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) when used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. Anti-PF4/Heparin antibodies are commonly found in patients with HIT. For use in adult population suspected of HIT. Not for use in isolation to exclude HIT. HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls are for the quality control of the HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) assay as performed on the ACL AcuStar. For prescription use.
Device Story
Device is a fully automated, chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) for detecting IgG antibodies against PF4/heparin complexes in human citrated plasma or serum. Used in clinical laboratories on the ACL AcuStar instrument. Principle: magnetic particles coated with PF4/PVS complex capture antibodies; isoluminol-labeled anti-human IgG tracer binds captured antibodies; light emission (RLUs) measured by optical system is proportional to antibody concentration. Output is a qualitative positive/negative result (cut-off 1.00 U/mL). Results aid clinicians in HIT risk assessment alongside clinical scores (e.g., 4T score) and other findings. Benefits include automated, standardized testing compared to manual ELISA methods, potentially improving diagnostic workflow for suspected HIT patients.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study of 790 patients suspected of HIT compared the device to the Serotonin Release Assay (SRA). Results: 63% PPA (95% CI: 48-76%), 99% NPA (95% CI: 98-99%), 76% PPV, 98% NPV. Total percent agreement was 97%. Bench testing included precision, reproducibility, analytical specificity, and interference studies (hemoglobin, bilirubin, triglycerides, heparin, HAMA). Rheumatoid factor interference noted.
Technological Characteristics
Chemiluminescent immunoassay; paramagnetic beads coated with PF4/PVS complex; isoluminol-conjugated anti-human IgG tracer. Automated on ACL AcuStar instrument. Reagents include phosphate/Tris buffers, BSA, stabilizers, preservatives. 4-Parameter Logistic Curve (4PLC) data reduction. Refrigerated storage (2-8°C).
Indications for Use
Indicated for adult patients suspected of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) to aid in risk assessment by detecting IgG antibodies against PF4/heparin complexes. Not for use in isolation to exclude HIT.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A platelet factor 4 radioimmunoassay is a device used to measure the level of platelet factor 4, a protein released during platelet activation by radioimmunoassay. This device measures platelet activiation, which may indicate a coagulation disorder, such as myocardial infarction or coronary artery disease.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
K170854
B. Purpose for Submission:
Clearance of a new device
C. Measurand:
Anti-PF4/Heparin IgG Antibody
D. Type of Test:
Automated, chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA)
E. Applicant:
Instrumentation Laboratory (IL) Co.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PE4-H) Assay
HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 864.7695 Platelet factor 4 radioimmunoassay
21 CFR 864.5425 Multipurpose system for in vitro coagulation studies
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
LCO, Platelet Factor 4 Radioimmunoassay
GGN, Plasma, Coagulation Control
{1}
4. Panel:
Hematology (81)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) is a qualitative, fully automated, chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) for the detection of IgG antibodies that react with Platelet Factor 4 (PF4) when complexed to heparin. The assay is for use in human 3.2% or 3.8% citrated plasma and serum on the ACL AcuStar instrument in a laboratory setting.
The result provided by the assay should be interpreted as either positive or negative based on the assay cut-off (1.00 U/mL). The positive or negative result aids in determining the risk for heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) when used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
Anti-PF4/Heparin antibodies are commonly found in patients with HIT. For use in adult population suspected of HIT. Not for use in isolation to exclude HIT.
HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls are for the quality control of the HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) assay as performed on the ACL AcuStar.
For prescription use.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as Intended Use
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
ACL AcuStar
I. Device Description:
The HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) assay is a chemiluminescent two-step immunoassay consisting of magnetic particles coated with PF4 complexed to polyvinyl sulfonate (PVS) which captures PF4/Heparin antibodies from the sample, if present.
The HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) kit consists of:
{2}
- HIT-IgG(PF4-H) Cartridge for 25 determinations: Cartridge containing 1 vial of magnetic particle suspension coated with PF4/PVS complex, 1 vial of assay buffer, 1 vial of tracer consisting of an mAb anti-human IgG antibody labeled with isoluminol, and 1 vial of sample diluent used for the regular predilution of the sample. The reagents are in a phosphate or Tris buffer containing bovine serum albumin, bovine fetal serum, PF4/PVS complex, mouse monoclonal IgG, stabilizers, and preservative.
- HIT-IgG(PF4-H) Calibrator: Barcoded tube of a solution with humanized mAb anti-PF4-Heparin in Tris buffer containing bovine serum albumin, stabilizers and preservative.
- HIT-IgG(PF4-H) Calibrator: Barcoded tube of a solution with humanized mAb anti-PF4-Heparin in Tris buffer containing bovine serum albumin, stabilizers, and preservative. The calibrators are lot specific and cannot be used with other lots of reagents.
The HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls consists of different concentrations of humanized monoclonal anti-PF4-Heparin. The Low HIT Control is intended for the assessment of precision and accuracy of the HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) assay below the cut-off. The High HIT Control is intended for the assessment of precision and accuracy of the HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) assay above the cut-off. Use of both controls is recommended for a complete quality control program.
# J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Zymutest HIA IgG
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K071255
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls | Predicate Zymutest HIA IgG |
| Intended Use | HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) is a qualitative, fully automated, chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) for the detection of IgG antibodies that react with Platelet Factor 4 (PF4) when complexed to heparin. The assay is for use in human 3.2% or 3.8% citrated plasma and serum on the ACL AcuStar instrument in a laboratory setting. | The ZYMUTEST HIA IgG ELISA is a qualitative assay itended for the detection of heparin-dependent antibodies of the IgG isotype, in human plasma, by clinical laboratories. It is intended for in vitro diagnostic use. |
{3}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls | Predicate Zymutest HIA IgG |
| | The result provided by the assay should be interpreted as either positive or negative based on the assay cut-off (1.00 U/mL). The positive or negative result aids in determining the risk for heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) when used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. Anti-PF4/Heparin antibodies are commonly found in patients with HIT. For use in adult population suspected of HIT. Not for use in isolation to exclude HIT. HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls are for the quality control of the HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) assay as performed on the ACL AcuStar. For prescription use. | |
| Assay type | Qualitative | Same |
| Measurand | Anti-PF4/Heparin IgG Antibodies | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls | Predicate Zymutest HIA IgG |
| Sample type | Citrated (3.2% and 3.8%) human plasma and serum | Citrated (3.2% and 3.8%) human plasma |
| Reagents | Cartridge containing magnetic particle suspension coated with PF4 complexed to polyvinyl sulfonate (PVS) | Microtiter plate coated with unfractionated heparin |
| Antibodies/conjugate | Mouse monoclonal anti-human IgG antibody/ Isoluminol conjugated anti-human IgG | Goat antibody specific for human IgG/ Peroxidase conjugated anti-human IgG |
| Detection method | Chemiluminescence | Colorimetry (Absorbance) |
| Calibration | Lot specific Master Curve and two Calibrators | Not applicable |
| Cut-off | Fixed clinical cut-off: ≥ 1.00 U/mL | When the assay is run at 20±1°C, the results are as follows: Positive: A450 > 0.50 Weakly Positive: 0.30 ≤ A450 ≤ 0.50 Negative: A450 ≤ 0.30 (A450=Absorbance at 450nm) |
{4}
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurements Procedures; Approved Guideline; 2014
CLSI EP07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline; 2005
CLSI EP12-A2, User Protocol For Evaluation of Qualitative Test Performance; Approved Guideline; 2008
CLSI EP14-A2, Evaluation of Matrix Effects; Approved Guideline; 2013
CLSI EP17-A2; Evaluation of Detection Capability For Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline; 2012
CLSI EP24-A2, Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Laboratory Tests Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves; Approved Guideline; 2011
CLSI EP25-A3, Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved Guideline; 2009
CLSI EP28-A3, Defining, Establishing and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline; 2010
L. Test Principle:
The HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PP4-H) assay is a chemiluminescent two-step immunoassay consisting of paramagnetic beads coated with PF4 complexed to polyvinyl sulfonate (PVS) which capture PF4/Heparin antibodies if present in the sample. Diluted patient plasma or serum, the magnetic beads suspension, and the assay buffer are combined into a second cuvette, and mixed. Following incubation, magnetic separation and a wash step, a tracer consisting of an isoluminol conjugated anti-human IgG antibodies is added to the cuvette and may bind the captured PF4/Heparin IgG on the particles. After a second incubation, magnetic separation and wash step, reagents that trigger the luminescent reaction are added and the emitted light is measured as Relative Light Units (RLU) by the ACL AcuStar optical system. The RLUs are directly proportional to the PF4/Heparin IgG antibody concentration in the sample.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision
{5}
Three lots of HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) reagent were tested on the ACL AcuStar analyzer. The study used five patient samples to span the assay range. Each sample was tested with each reagent lot in duplicate, twice a day for 22 days, for a total of 88 replicates per level per lot as summarized below.
HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) Reagent Lot 1
| Sample | Mean (U/mL) | Within-run %CV | Total (Within-device) %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample 1 (Pool) | 0.62 | 8.3% | 8.3% |
| Sample 2 (Pool) | 2.23 | 6.5% | 6.8% |
| Sample 3 (Unadulterated) | 21.04 | 4.8% | 5.6% |
| Sample 4 (Unadulterated) | 46.15 | 4.7% | 4.8% |
| Sample 5 (Pool) | 90.35 | 4.4% | 4.4% |
HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) Reagent Lot 2
| Sample | Mean (U/mL) | Within-run %CV | Total (Within-device) %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample 1 (Pool) | 0.52 | 8.4% | 9.2% |
| Sample 2 (Pool) | 1.98 | 7.5% | 9.3% |
| Sample 3 (Unadulterated) | 26.13 | 6.1% | 6.1% |
| Sample 4 (Unadulterated) | 54.88 | 6.9% | 7.5% |
| Sample 5 (Pool) | 111.74 | 4.1% | 7.3% |
HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) Reagent Lot 3
| Sample | Mean (U/mL) | Within-run %CV | Total (Within-device) %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample 1 (Pool) | 0.49 | 13.0% | 13.8% |
| Sample 2 (Pool) | 1.69 | 7.1% | 7.4% |
| Sample 3 (Unadulterated) | 18.40 | 7.4% | 8.1% |
| Sample 4 (Unadulterated) | 36.85 | 4.8% | 5.6% |
| Sample 5 (Pool) | 86.79 | 6.8% | 7.4% |
Combined HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) Reagent Lots
| Sample | Mean (U/mL) | Lot-to-lot Variability %CV |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sample 1 (Pool) | 0.54 | 11.8% |
| Sample 2 (Pool) | 1.97 | 13.8% |
| Sample 3 (Unadulterated) | 21.85 | 18.0% |
| Sample 4 (Unadulterated) | 45.96 | 19.6% |
| Sample 5 (Pool) | 96.30 | 14.0% |
An additional internal precision study was performed with three different lots of HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) reagent cartridges, using three plasma samples at levels near the claimed assay cut-off (sample 1: negative sample pool, sample 2: positive sample pool, sample 3: unadulterated positive sample). Each sample was analyzed with each of the three reagent lots on two different ACL AcuStar instruments by two different operators over five days, two runs per day, three replicates per run, totaling an N=360 measurements per sample level. Obtained
6
{6}
precision data was within pre-established acceptance criteria. The data is summarized in the table below:
| Sample | N | Mean (U/mL) | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Between-Instrument | | Between-Operator | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 1 | 360 | 0.79 | 0.04 | 4.7% | 0.02 | 2.1% | 0.02 | 2.0% | 0.07 | 8.3% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.08 | 10.0% |
| 2 | 360 | 1.43 | 0.06 | 4.3% | 0.04 | 3.0% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.07 | 4.8% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.10 | 7.1% |
| 3 | 360 | 3.61 | 0.13 | 3.6% | 0.14 | 3.7% | 0.05 | 1.5% | 0.12 | 3.4% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.23 | 6.4% |
# Reproducibility
Reproducibility studies were conducted at three external clinical sites by three operators (one operator per site), on three ACL AcuStar instruments (one instrument per site), using three lots of HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) reagent cartridges and three lots of HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls (low and high). The same three patient citrated plasma sample pools were tested across all sites. Each sample was tested in triplicate, twice a day for five days, for a total of 30 replicates per level. The statistical analyses were summarized using a two-way nested ANOVA for individual site results and a three-way nested ANOVA for 3-site pooled results. The pooled data for each reagent lot and control lot is presented below:
HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) Reagent Lot 1
| Sample | N | Mean (U/mL) | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Site | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Low HIT Control | 90 | 0.64 | 0.02 | 2.5 | 0.03 | 4.7 | 0.01 | 1.7 | 0.06 | 9.2 | 0.07 | 10.7 |
| High HIT Control | 90 | 3.05 | 0.10 | 3.3 | 0.10 | 3.2 | 0.05 | 3.2 | 0.27 | 8.8 | 0.32 | 10.5 |
| Plasma Sample 1 | 90 | 0.06 | All Replicates < 1.00 U/mL | | | | | | | | | |
| Plasma Sample 2 | 90 | 3.52 | 0.17 | 4.8 | 0.09 | 2.7 | 0.07 | 1.8 | 0.16 | 4.6 | 0.26 | 7.4 |
| Plasma Sample 3 | 90 | 21.33 | 1.53 | 7.2 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.37 | 1.7 | 0.77 | 3.6 | 1.75 | 8.2 |
HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) Reagent Lot 2
| Sample | N | Mean (U/mL) | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Site | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Low HIT Control | 90 | 0.56 | 0.02 | 3.6 | 0.02 | 2.9 | 0.02 | 3.9 | 0.03 | 5.7 | 0.05 | 8.2 |
| High HIT Control | 90 | 2.66 | 0.11 | 4.3 | 0.09 | 3.2 | 0.06 | 2.2 | 0.14 | 5.3 | 0.21 | 7.8 |
| Plasma Sample 1 | 90 | 0.04 | All Replicates < 1.00 U/mL | | | | | | | | | |
| Plasma Sample 2 | 90 | 3.23 | 0.15 | 4.6 | 0.14 | 4.4 | 0.10 | 3.1 | 0.24 | 7.3 | 0.33 | 10.2 |
| Plasma Sample 3 | 90 | 20.79 | 1.41 | 6.8 | 0.42 | 2.0 | 0.50 | 2.4 | 0.88 | 4.2 | 1.79 | 8.6 |
HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) Reagent Lot 3
| Sample | N | Mean (U/mL) | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Site | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Low HIT Control | 90 | 0.47 | 0.02 | 3.6 | 0.02 | 4.6 | 0.02 | 3.2 | 0.01 | 2.7 | 0.03 | 7.2 |
| High HIT Control | 90 | 2.62 | 0.10 | 3.9 | 0.11 | 4.4 | 0.12 | 4.5 | 0.06 | 2.3 | 0.20 | 7.7 |
| Plasma Sample 1 | 90 | 0.06 | All Replicates < 1.00 U/mL | | | | | | | | | |
{7}
| Sample | N | Mean (U/mL) | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Site | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Plasma Sample 2 | 90 | 4.47 | 0.19 | 4.3 | 0.28 | 6.3 | 0.21 | 4.7 | 0.08 | 1.8 | 0.41 | 9.2 |
| Plasma Sample 3 | 90 | 29.64 | 1.84 | 6.2 | 1.54 | 5.2 | 1.80 | 6.1 | 0.91 | 3.1 | 3.14 | 10.6 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) assay is a qualitative assay therefore, linearity is not applicable.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability
There is currently no International Standard available for Anti-PF4/Heparin (PF4/H) antibodies; therefore, each manufacturer must establish their own internal standardization and reportable units. Two different types of calibrator materials are prepared for the HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) assay standardization:
- House Standard Calibrators: Used internally to prepare the kit calibrators
- Kit Calibrators: Used by the ACL AcuStar instrument to prepare the Working Calibration Curve
HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) is standardized to House Standards (humanized monoclonal anti PF4-Heparin antibody) diluted in Tris buffer containing bovine serum albumin (BSA), stabilizers and preservative. The values of the House Standards were set after studying a population of HIT suspected samples. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis vs Serotonin Release Assay (SRA) demonstrated a clear separation of negative and positive results with an optimal sensitivity and specificity using a cut-off of 1.00 U/mL. The Primary Standard was set at 1.00 U/mL.
Stability
HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) reagent
Reagent real-time shelf-life stability and continuous on-board stability testing was performed using three lots of HemosIL AcuStar HIT-Ab(PF4-H) kit reagents and analyzed on the ACL AcuStar instrument. Shelf-life testing included four plasma samples and one lot of control material (low and high) analyzed with three reagent lots. The lots were manufactured at different time points, spanning the claimed stability range. Each material was analyzed in triplicate and compared to the results obtained with the newly manufactured lot (Reference Lot) as time zero.
The continuous on-board stability was established at 12 weeks, after opening and placed on board the ACL AcuStar.
{8}
The shelf-life stability was established at 12 months when stored at 2–8°C.
The HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) kit is sensitive to temperature change. Therefore, the shipping procedure requires refrigeration at 2–8°C. Transport will include a delta-track temperature monitor in each shipment to record temperature values during transport.
## HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls
Three lots of HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls were tested. The continuous on-board stability was established at 12 hours on-board the ACL AcuStar.
The cumulative on-board stability was established at 6 days when placed twice daily on-board (in an open barcoded tube) for 45 minutes and then recapped and placed at 2–8°C on the ACL AcuStar.
The shelf-life stability was established at 12 months when stored at 2–8°C.
The HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls are stable at high temperatures and are unaffected by one freeze/thaw cycle. Controls can be frozen at -20°C and thawed once. Do not refreeze.
## HIT-IgG(PF4-H) Calibrators
The continuous on-board stability was established at 4 hours, after opening and placed on-board the ACL AcuStar.
The shelf-life stability was established at 12 months when stored at 2–8°C.
Expected values (controls, calibrators)
## HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls
The values for HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls are assigned with respect to the House Standard Controls according to internal protocol and are lot-specific.
An internal precision study was performed using three lots of HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls (low and high) run on ACL AcuStar instrument with a single lot of HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) reagent. The control material was tested for 20 days x 2 runs x 2 replicates per run, for a total N=80 measurements per level, for each lot. The calculated precision data was within pre-established acceptance criteria. The data is summarized in the table below:
{9}
10
| HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls | | Mean (U/mL) | Within-run %CV | Within-device %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot 1 | Low HIT Control | 0.58 | 4.6% | 7.0% |
| | High HIT Control | 3.16 | 3.5% | 6.1% |
| Lot 2 | Low HIT Control | 0.49 | 3.2% | 7.0% |
| | High HIT Control | 2.77 | 3.4% | 5.0% |
| Lot 3 | Low HIT Control | 0.60 | 4.1% | 6.3% |
| | High HIT Control | 2.96 | 2.8% | 5.5% |
## HIT-IgG(PF4-H) Calibrators
The HemosIL AcuStar HIT Calibrators are included as a component of the reagent kit. The calibrator value assignment is performed with respect to the House Standard Calibrator, according to an internal protocol and are lot-specific.
A precision study was conducted using Calibrators 1 and 2 from three lots of HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) kits. The samples were tested with a single lot of the reagent following a 20 day x 2 runs per day x 2 replicates per run study design. The calculated precision data were within the pre-established acceptance criteria. The data is summarized in the table below:
| HIT-IgG(PF4-H) Calibrators | | Mean (U/mL) | Within-run %CV | Within-device %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reagent Lot 1 | Calibrator 1 | 0.92 | 3.9% | 6.3% |
| | Calibrator 2 | 15.37 | 3.2% | 3.9% |
| Reagent Lot 2 | Calibrator 1 | 0.94 | 2.7% | 5.4% |
| | Calibrator 2 | 14.85 | 2.2% | 3.1% |
| Reagent Lot 3 | Calibrator 1 | 0.90 | 2.4% | 4.0% |
| | Calibrator 2 | 14.90 | 3.3% | 5.0% |
## d. Detection limit:
The Limit of the Blank (LoB) and Limit of Detection (LoD) study was performed using two different lots of HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) reagents tested on an ACL AcuStar, according to CLSI EP17-A2. The LoB and LoD were established at 0.06 U/mL and 0.39 U/mL, respectively.
## e. Analytical specificity:
Analytical specificity for detecting anti-HIT antibodies was tested in an inhibition assay with heparin, using 59 citrated plasma samples. Inhibition of a positive reaction by ≥ 50% was considered confirmatory for the assay specificity to heparin-dependent antibody characteristics of HIT. Four samples out of 59 were found not inhibited by the HIT antibody.
A dose-response interference study was performed for hemoglobin, unconjugated bilirubin, conjugated bilirubin, triglycerides, low-molecular weight (LMW) heparin, unfractionated (UF) heparin, rheumatoid factor, and human anti-mouse antibody (HAMA). Three samples were prepared from healthy donors and HIT-positive
{10}
patients to achieve a negative (0.6 U/mL), weakly positive (1.0 U/mL) and positive (7.0 U/mL) levels of the PF4-H antibody. The results of the study determined that the HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) on the AcuStar analyzer is not affected by the interferents up to the levels indicated in table below:
| Interferent | Highest Concentration with no Significant Interference |
| --- | --- |
| Hemoglobin | 500 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin (conjugated and unconjugated | 18 mg/dL |
| Triglycerides | 1250 mg/dL |
| LMW and UF Heparin | 1 IU/mL |
| HAMA | 1 μg/mL |
Rheumatoid Factor was found to interfere with the assay. A limitation stating that Rheumatoid Factor may produce an over estimation of the test result with the HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) assay is included in the labeling.
Twenty-six samples from patients diagnosed with Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) were tested with a single lot of HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) reagent. All samples reported negative, demonstrating that the assay is not affected by APS antibodies.
f. Assay cut-off:
A method comparison with the Serotonin Release Assay (SRA) was performed using 87 citrated plasma samples from HIT suspected patients (45 SRA positive and 42 SRA negative). The optimal cut-off determined by ROC analysis was 1.0 U/mL (95.2% Agreement, CI = 86.7% – 99.0%). Based on these studies, it was determined that for heparin treated patient samples, HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) results ≥ 1.0 U/mL may indicate the presence of HIT antibodies.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
A multi-site clinical study included a total of 802 patients exposed to heparin and suspected of HIT. The subjects enrolled in the study ranged from 18–97 years old. All subjects were categorized according to the 4Ts pretest probability scoring system for HIT. Studies were performed in three clinical test sites located in the United States. Testing included comparison of AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) to the Zymutest HIA IgG assay (K071255).
The combined sites data, summarized below, are based on a cut-off of 1.0 U/mL for the HemosIL HIT-Ab(PF4-H) assay and 0.5 OD for the Zymutest HIA IgG.
{11}
| | Zymutest HIA IgG | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) | Positive | 26 | 9 | 35 |
| | Negative | 48 | 719 | 767 |
| | Total | 74 | 728 | 802 |
| HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) vs. Zymutest HIA IgG | Proportion | Wilson 95% CI | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PPA (Positive Percent Agreement) | 35% (26/74) | 25% | 47% |
| NPA (Negative Percent Agreement) | 99% (719/728) | 98% | 99% |
| Total Percent Agreement | 93% (745/802) | 91% | 94% |
b. Matrix comparison:
3.2% vs. 3.8% Sodium Citrated Plasma
Twelve fresh, unadulterated, paired citrated 3.2% and 3.8% plasma samples were tested for equivalence. In addition, 29 frozen paired 3.2% and 3.8% citrated plasma samples were spiked with HIT-positive samples to achieve a concentration range covering 0.15–66.82 U/mL. The study confirmed equivalence between 3.2% citrated and 3.8% citrated plasma for fresh and frozen samples.
Sodium Citrated Plasma vs. Serum
Thirteen fresh unadulterated paired 3.2% citrated plasma and serum samples were tested for equivalence. Additionally, 29 paired samples were collected and shipped frozen to another location for testing. After thawing, the samples were spiked, with HIT positive samples to achieve concentration range 0.13–75.92 U/mL. The study confirmed matrix equivalence between 3.2% citrated plasma and serum for fresh and frozen samples.
Fresh vs. Frozen Sample Study:
Fifty-seven unadulterated samples covering the range of 0.0–32.16 U/mL were tested for fresh/frozen equivalence after storage at ≤ -20°C for at least 24 hours. The study confirmed equivalence between matrices up to two freeze/thaw cycles.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
The clinical study was expanded to test samples using the Serotonin Release Assay
{12}
(SRA) as the reference method. Frozen aliquots of samples tested in the multi-site predicate comparison study were shipped to and tested at one site. A total of 790 patients were tested. The results summarized below are based on a cut-off of 1.0 U/mL for the HemosIL AcuStar HIT- IgG(PF4-H) assay and the 20% serotonin-release cut-off value for the SRA method.
| | Serotonin Release Assay | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| HemosIL AcuStar HIT- IgG(PF4-H) | Positive | 26 | 8 | 34 |
| | Negative | 15 | 741 | 756 |
| | Total | 41 | 749 | 790 |
| HemosIL AcuStar HIT- IgG(PF4-H) vs. Serotonin Release Assay | Proportion | Wilson 95% CI | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PPA (Positive Percent Agreement) | 63% (26/41) | 48% | 76% |
| NPA (Negative Percent Agreement) | 99% (741/749) | 98% | 99% |
| HemosIL AcuStar HIT- IgG(PF4-H) vs. Serotonin Release Assay | Proportion | Wilson 95% CI | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PPV (Positive Predictive Value) | 76% (26/34) | 60% | 88% |
| NPV (Negative Predictive Value) | 98% (741/756) | 97% | 99% |
| Total Percent Agreement | 97% (767/790) | 96% | 98% |
# Zymutest HIA IgG vs. Serotonin Release Assay
The tables below show combined data from 3-sites from comparison between Zymutest HIA IgG (the predicate) and the reference method (SRA).
| | Serotonin Release Assay | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Zymutest HIA IgG | Positive | 26 | 47 | 73 |
| | Negative | 15 | 702 | 717 |
| | Total | 41 | 749 | 790 |
| Zymutest HIA IgG vs. Serotonin Release Assay | Proportion | Wilson 95% CI | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PPA (Positive Percent Agreement) | 63% (26/41) | 48% | 76% |
| NPA (Negative Percent Agreement) | 94% (702/749) | 92% | 95% |
{13}
| Zymutest HIA IgG vs. Serotonin Release Assay | Proportion | Wilson 95% CI | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PPV (Positive Predictive Value) | 36% (26/73) | 26% | 47% |
| NPV (Negative Predictive Value) | 98% (702/717) | 97% | 99% |
| Total Percent Agreement | 92% (728/790) | 90% | 94% |
b. Clinical specificity:
Refer to Section M.3.a above.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
4. Clinical cut-off:
Refer to Section M.3.a above.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Reference Interval – Healthy Donors Not Heparin Exposed
A total of N=154 citrated plasma samples from apparently healthy adult donors who were not exposed to heparin were tested. The gender and age distribution was 88 females and 66 males, between 18 and 80 years of age. The data were analyzed using the non-parametric quantile interval based on the order statistics. The reference interval was calculated and the upper limit determined to be 0.37 U/mL (90% CI: 0.17 to 1.25 U/mL).
Reference Interval – Heparin Exposed, Not- HIT Suspected Patients (HIT Negative):
A total number of 91 samples from patients exposed to heparin but not suspected of HIT were tested. The gender and age distribution included 39 females and 52 males, between 18 and 100 years of age. The statistical method applied to analyze the data was the non-parametric quantile interval based on the order statistics. The reference interval was calculated and the upper limit determined to be 0.75 U/mL (90% CI: 0.46 to 2.86 U/mL).
N. Instrument Name:
ACL AcuStar
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device?
{14}
Yes ☐ X ☐ or No ☐
Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?
Yes ☐ or No ☐ X ☐
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X ☐ or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
Barcode, manual entry
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Automated. The ACL AcuStar instrument’s fluidic system performs the sampling, adding of diluents, reagent mixing, aspirating waste from cuvettes, cleaning of the magnetic particles and dispensing and aspirating of trigger agents. The sample carousel can hold 6 sample racks (numbered 1 to 6), each capable of holding 5 samples for a total capacity of 30 samples. The sample racks are moved by the carousel to dedicated locations where an aliquot of the sample can be aspirated and transferred for testing.
5. Calibration:
The HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) assay utilizes a 4-Parameter Logistic Curve fit (4PLC) data reduction method to generate a Master Curve. The Master Curve is predefined and lot dependent. The master curve is uploaded onto the ACL AcuStar instrument through the Reagent Cartridge barcode. The master curve is generated by analyzing, on different ACL AcuStar instruments (at least 2), on different days, a set of internal materials at concentrations that cover the range of 0.00 U/mL up to 128.00 U/mL. A minimum of 72 determinations per level are obtained. Every new Reagent Cartridge lot must be calibrated before first use with the HIT-IgG(PF4-H) Calibrators. The calibrators are ready to use in a barcoded tube and when loaded, the ACL AcuStar instrument automatically performs three replicates of each calibrator. Based on the results obtained with the both Calibrators, an instrument specific 4PLC Working Curve is created by the ACL AcuStar software, which is used to calculate the reported values (U/mL) from the instrument signal (RLU) obtained for each sample.
6. Quality Control:
HemosIL AcuStar HIT Controls Low and High are recommended for a complete quality control program.
15
{15}
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
16
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.