K170576 · Lensar, Inc. · OOE · May 5, 2017 · Ophthalmic
Device Facts
Record ID
K170576
Device Name
LENSAR Laser System - fs 3D (LLS-fs 3D)
Applicant
Lensar, Inc.
Product Code
OOE · Ophthalmic
Decision Date
May 5, 2017
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 886.4390
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The LENSAR Laser System - fs 3D (LLS-fs 3D) is intended for use in patients undergoing cataract surgery for removal of the crystalline lens. Intended uses in cataract surgery include anterior capsulotomy, laser phacofragmentation, and the creation of full and partial thickness single-plane and multi-plane arc cuts/incisions in the cornea, each of which may be performed either individually or consecutively during the same procedure.
Device Story
LENSAR Laser System - fs 3D (LLS-fs 3D) is an ophthalmic femtosecond laser system used during cataract surgery. It performs anterior capsulotomy, lens phacofragmentation, and corneal incisions. The system integrates with preoperative analysis devices (topographers) to perform automated Iris Registration with cyclorotation adjustment and IntelliAxis corneal marking for Toric IOL alignment. The device uses a pulsed laser to provide automated precision control over incision size, architecture, and depth. It is operated by ophthalmic surgeons in a clinical setting. The system processes data from integrated topographers to guide laser treatment planning. By automating registration and alignment, the device assists surgeons in achieving precise surgical outcomes, potentially improving visual results for patients receiving Toric IOLs.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data required. Substantial equivalence was supported by bench-level verification and validation testing of the Iris Registration algorithm. Performance metrics for the modified algorithm were compared against the original algorithm using datasets from five topographers (i-Optics Cassini, Nidek OPD Scan, Topcon Aladdin, OCULUS Pentacam HR, and Pentacam AXL), reporting success rates for determining correct cyclotorsion angles, failure rates, and incorrect angle rates.
Technological Characteristics
Ophthalmic femtosecond laser system; pulsed laser source. Integrates with external topographers (Topcon Aladdin, OCULUS Pentacam HR/AXL, i-Optics Cassini, Nidek OPD Scan) for Iris Registration. Features include automated cyclorotation adjustment and IntelliAxis corneal marking. Software-controlled laser delivery for capsulotomy, phacofragmentation, and corneal incisions. System includes updated software for user interaction and an enhanced Iris Registration algorithm routine.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing cataract surgery for removal of the crystalline lens, including anterior capsulotomy, laser phacofragmentation, and corneal incisions.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An ophthalmic laser is an AC-powered device intended to coagulate or cut tissue of the eye, orbit, or surrounding skin by a laser beam.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/2 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right. The profiles are stacked on top of each other, with the top profile being the largest and the bottom profile being the smallest. The logo is surrounded by the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" in a circular pattern.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
May 5, 2017
LENSAR. Inc. Keith Peck Director, Quality Assurance 2800 Discovery Drive, Suite 100 Orlando, FL 32826
Re: K170576 Trade/Device Name: LENSAR Laser System - fs 3D (LLS-fs 3D) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 886.4390 Regulation Name: Ophthalmic Laser Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OOE, HOC Dated: February 24, 2017 Received: February 27, 2017
Dear Keith Peck:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Denise L. Hampton -S
for Malvina B. Eydelman, M.D. Director Division of Ophthalmic and Ear, Nose and Throat Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K170576
Device Name
LENSAR Laser System - fs 3D (LLS-fs 3D)
### Indications for Use (Describe)
The LENSAR Laser System - fs 3D (LLS-fs 3D) is intended for use in patients undergoing cataract surgery for removal of the crystalline lens. Intended uses in cataract surgery include anterior capsulotomy, laser phacofragmentation, and the creation of full and partial thickness single-plane and multi-plane arc cuts/incisions in the cornea, each of which may be performed either individually or consecutively during the same procedure.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div style="display:flex; align-items:center;"><input checked="" type="checkbox"/> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)</div> |
| <div style="display:flex; align-items:center;"><input type="checkbox"/> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)</div> |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
K170576
# 510(k) SUMMARY
This 510(k) Summary document has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
#### SUBMITTER INFORMATION 1.0
The submitter of this 510(k) Summary is:
| Company: |
|----------|
| |
### Contact Person:
LENSAR, Inc. 2800 Discovery Drive, Suite 100 Orlando, FL 32826
Keith Peck (888) 575-6412 (Office) (407) 386-7228 (Fax)
Summary Preparation Date: April 21, 2017
#### 2.0 DEVICE NAME
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | LENSAR Laser System – fs 3D (LLS-fs 3D) |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common/Usual Name: | LENSAR Laser System (LLS) |
| Classification Name(s): | Ophthalmic Femtosecond Laser (21 CFR 886.4390)<br>Phacofragmentation System (21 CFR 886.4670) |
| Product Code(s): | OOE; HQC |
| Review Panel: | Ophthalmic |
| Regulatory Class: | II |
#### PREDICATE DEVICE(S) 3.0
The legally marketed (predicate) devices to which LENSAR is claiming substantial equivalence are:
| 510(k) Number | Device | Date Cleared |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| K143010 (Primary) | LENSAR Laser System - fs 3D (LLS-fs 3D) | 03/20/2015 |
| K152453 | LENSAR Laser System - fs 3D (LLS-fs 3D) | 10/15/2015<br>(Clearance for use of Nidek OPD<br>Scan Topographer) |
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION 4.0
The LENSAR Laser System - fs 3D (LLS-fs 3D) with Streamline™ is a medical device for use in ophthalmic surgery. The device utilizes a pulsed laser that can be used to cut a precision capsulotomy in the anterior lens capsule, to fragment the cataractous lens for removal during
{4}------------------------------------------------
cataract surgery, and to create full and partial thickness single-plane and multi-plane arc cuts/ incisions in the cornea, each of which may be performed either individually or consecutively during the same procedure. Use of the laser provides automated precision control of the size of the capsular opening; the type and parameters of laser fragmentation treatment within the lens; as well as the size, architecture of incisions within the cornea, and depth of arcuate incisions. The LENSAR Laser System - fs 3D (LLS-fs 3D) with Streamline" includes the integration with preop analysis devices, automated Iris Registration with automatic cyclorotation adjustment, IntelliAxis" corneal marking for simple alignment of Toric IOLs as well as corneal treatment planning tools for precision guided laser treatments.
#### INDICATIONS FOR USE 5.0
The LENSAR Laser System - fs 3D (LLS-fs 3D) is intended for use in patients undergoing cataract surgery for removal of the crystalline lens. Intended uses in cataract surgery include anterior capsulotomy, laser phacofragmentation, and the creation of full and partial thickness single-plane and multi-plane arc cuts/incisions in the cornea, each of which may be performed either individually or consecutively during the same procedure.
### COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE 6.0 PREDICATE DEVICE
All elements of the proposed device remain unchanged from that cleared in the legally marketed (predicate) devices except for:
- the addition of the Topcon Aladdin and OCULUS Pentacam® HR and Pentacam® AXL topographers for use with the Iris Registration feature of the LLS-fs 3D.
- . an additional routine to the Iris Registration function that is intended to allow the algorithm to identify the cyclotorsion angle by way of increased robustness to pupil center drift and gaze direction.
- · updated software to support improved user interaction and overall experience.
#### 7.0 PERFORMANCE DATA
The following performance data were undertaken in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
## Performance Evaluation of the Iris Registration Feature
Verification and validation testing were completed to demonstrate that the device performance complies with the previously defined specifications and requirements identified for the predicate LENSAR Laser System. In addition to the verification of the three (3) new topographers, the Nidek OPD Scan Topographer data was re-run as part of the verification to demonstrate the Iris Registration results were substantially equivalent to its previous cleared specifications and requirements. All criteria were met and the results demonstrate that all performance specifications and requirements for the changes to the Iris Registration function and adding the
{5}------------------------------------------------
Topcon Aladdin, OCULUS Pentacam® HR and Pentacam® AXL topographers as validated topographers for use with the Iris Registration feature of the LLS-fs 3D have been met.
The software on the proposed LLS-fs 3D System has been updated in support of the changes outlined above.
| Iris Registration Comparison Results | | | |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Results Description | | |
| Topographer | Algorithm Determines<br>the Correct<br>Cyclotorsion Angle | Algorithm Cannot<br>Determine an<br>Angle | Algorithm Determines<br>an Incorrect<br>Cyclotorsion Angle |
| i-Optics Cassini | ≥ 98.97% | ≤ 1.03% | ≤ 0.002% |
| Nidek OPD Scan | ≥ 98.52% | ≤ 1.48% | ≤ 0.002% |
| Topcon Aladdin | ≥ 97.17% | ≤ 2.83% | ≤ 0.002% |
| OCULUS Pentacam® HR | ≥ 97.50% | ≤ 2.50% | ≤ 0.002% |
| OCULUS Pentacam® AXL | ≥ 98.33% | ≤ 1.67% | ≤ 0.002% |
| Iris Registration Success Rates for i-Optics Cassini Topographer | | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------------------|
| Result | Original Algorithm | Modified Algorithm |
| Correct Cyclotorsion Angle | $\ge$ 97.44% | $\ge$ 98.97% |
| Cannot Determine an Angle | $\le$ 2.56% | $\le$ 1.03% |
| Incorrect Cyclotorsion Angle | $\le$ 0.002% | $\le$ 0.002% |
| Iris Registration Success Rates for Nidek OPD Scan Topographer | | |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------------------|
| Result | Original Algorithm | Modified Algorithm |
| Correct Cyclotorsion Angle | ≥ 99.26% | ≥ 98.52% |
| Cannot Determine an Angle | ≤ 0.74% | ≤ 1.48% |
| Incorrect Cyclotorsion Angle | ≤ 0.002% | ≤ 0.002% |
The above tables of comparison results have been updated for the addition of the Topcon Aladdin, OCULUS Pentacam® HR and Pentacam® AXL topographers. Additionally, it has been updated for previously approved devices after re-running the respective data sets through the additional routine to the Iris Registration function, which resulted in slight changes to the expected percentages.
{6}------------------------------------------------
K170576
# Summary of Clinical Studies
The addition of the Iris Registration changes and Topcon Aladdin, OCULUS Pentacam® HR and Pentacam® AXL topographers for use with the Iris Registration feature of the LENSAR Laser System does not change the indication for use. Thus, clinical performance data to demonstrate substantial equivalence was not required for this product change.
#### CONCLUSIONS 8.0
Based on the above supportive information, the proposed LENSAR Laser System - fs 3D (LLS-fs 3D) with the Iris Registration changes and the addition of the validated Topcon Aladdin, OCULUS Pentacam® HR and Pentacam® AXL topographers for use with the Iris Registration feature is substantially equivalent with respect to technological characteristics and indication for use as the legally marketed predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.