The Scanostics UTI Check Application test system consists of the Scanostics UTI Check Application and the URS-2L (UTI) Urine Test Strips. The test system is intended for the qualitative detection of nitrite and leukocytes in urine as an aid in the screening of urinary tract infections (UTI). It is intended for over-the-counter home use only.
Device Story
System consists of URS-2L urine test strips, a calibration backing card, and the Scanostics UTI Check smartphone application. User applies midstream urine to reagent pads on the test strip; after two minutes, user captures an image of the strip alongside the calibration card using the smartphone camera. The application processes the image by comparing the color of the reagent pads to the calibration color blocks on the backing card to determine the result. The application provides step-by-step testing instructions, includes a timer to ensure correct timing, and performs quality control checks on optics and strip alignment. Results are displayed to the user to aid in UTI screening. The system is intended for home use by patients to facilitate clinical decision-making regarding the need for professional medical consultation.
Clinical Evidence
Lay user studies conducted at three sites compared the Scanostics UTI Check Application test system against the Clinistrip (URS-10) strips. Study evaluated accuracy of results in the hands of lay users and their ability to implement smartphone technology. Results demonstrated that lay users obtained testing data comparable to trained healthcare professionals using the predicate device.
Technological Characteristics
System utilizes URS-2L reagent strips (absorbent material with chemically active substances) and a rigid backing card with 32 calibration color blocks and 3 alignment squares. Sensing principle is colorimetric analysis via smartphone camera. Software performs image processing to calculate color distance between test pads and calibration references. Compatible with iPhone 6/6S and iPod touch (8th gen) running iOS 8+. Sterilization not applicable. Connectivity via smartphone camera/processing.
Indications for Use
Indicated for over-the-counter home use by individuals for the qualitative detection of nitrite and leukocytes in urine as an aid in screening for urinary tract infections (UTI).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A nitrite (nonquantitative) test system is a device intended to identify nitrite in urine. Nitrite identification is used in the diagnosis and treatment of uninary tract infection of bacterial origin.
Predicate Devices
Clinistrip 10SGL (k970250)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k170118
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Urinary nitrite and leukocytes
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative and semi-quantitative urinalysis
E. Applicant:
Teco Diagnostics
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Teco Diagnostics Scanostics UTI Check Application Test System
G. Regulatory Information:
| Regulation | Product Code | Test Name | Device Class | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 21 CFR 864.7675 | LJX | Leukocyte Peroxidase Test | I, meets the limitations of exemption in 21 CFR 864.9 (c)(9) | Hematology |
| 21 CFR 862.1510 | JMT | Nitrite (nonquantitative) Test System | I, meets the limitations of exemption in 21 CFR 862.9 (c)(9) | Chemistry |
| 21 CFR 862.2900 | KQO | Automated Test System | I | Chemistry |
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Scanostics UTI Check Application test system consists of the Scanostics UTI Check Application and the URS-2L (UTI) Urine Test Strips. The test system is intended for the qualitative detection of nitrite and leukocytes in urine as an aid in the screening of urinary tract infection (UTI). It is intended for over-the-counter home use only.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
In vitro diagnostic use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
The representative platform for the application is the iPhone 6 with iOS 9. Compatibility has been validated on both the iPhone 6 and 6S as well as the iPod touch (8th gen) with a minimum iOS requirement of iOS 8.
I. Device Description:
The Scanostics UTI Check Application test system consists of the Scanostics UTI Check Application, the URS-2L (UTI) Urine Test Strips, and the Scanostics backing card.
The URS-2L UTI Test Strips are comprised of two reagent pad areas, which are absorbent material saturated with chemically active substances, then dried and affixed to the plastic strip with double-sided adhesive.
The backing card comprises of thirty-two calibration color blocks and 3 black and white alignment squares printed onto a rigid card stock.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Clinistrip 10SGL
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k970250
{2}
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device | Predicate: Clinistrip 10SGL k970250 |
| Intended use | For the detection of nitrite and leukocytes in urine. | Same |
| Nitrite test methodology | This test relies on the conversion of nitrate to nitrite by the action of p-arsanilic acid to form a diazonium compound in an acid medium. This compound in turn couples with 1, 2, 3, 4 - tetrahydrobenzo(h) quinoline to produce a pink color. | Same |
| Leukocyte test methodology | This test is based on the hydrolysis of an indoxyl ester derivative through the action of leukocyte esterase. The liberated indoxyl ester reacts with a diazonium salt to produce a colored compound (pink to purple). | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device | Predicate: Clinistrip 10SGL |
| Testing parameters | Nitrite and leukocytes | 10 parameters including nitrite and leukocytes |
| Special instrument requirements | Apple mobile device with the Scanostics UTI Check App installed. | None |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI-EP7-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry, Approved Guideline- $2^{\mathrm{nd}}$ Edition (2005)
ISO 14971, Medical Devices- Application for Risk Management to Medical Devices, 2007
L. Test Principle:
The Scanostics UTI Check Application measures the color developed in 2 reaction zones (leukocytes and nitrite pads) on the UTI test strip following application of a urine sample. The developed colors are then compared to calibration colors located on the Scanostics
{3}
backing card and the result for each pad is determined based on the minimum color distance between the developed colors and calibration colors.
The Scanostics UTI Check Application instructs the user how to perform a UTI test and uses the built-in smartphone camera to perform color comparison between the test strip and the calibration squares.
The application guides the user through the test setup steps and prompts the user to apply the sample to the test strip.
The leukocytes test is based on the hydrolysis of an indoxyl ester derivative through the action of leukocyte esterase. The liberated indoxyl ester reacts with a diazonium salt to produce a colored compound (pink to purple).
The Nitrite test relies on the conversion of nitrate to nitrite by the action of $p$ -arsanilic acid to form a diazonium compound in an acid medium. This compound in turn couples with 1, 2, 3, 4 - tetrahydrobenzo(h) quinoline to produce a pink color.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The first precision study was performed in-house with five operators over 10 days using one iPhone 6 device with the App installed. Each day, each operator tested the Scanostics UTI Check application with five urine based controls; negative, trace leukocytes (15 cells/μL, near the clinical decision point), low positive nitrite (0.1 mg/dL, near the clinical decision point), medium leukocytes and nitrite, and high leukocytes and nitrite. Two replicates were obtained per control, so that a total of 100 measurements were collected per control sample. Results are described in the tables below:
Leukocyte Results:
| Control | Expected Range | % correct (expected range) | Replicates |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (Negative) | Negative | 100 | 100 |
| Medium | Trace to 2+ | 100* | 100 |
| High | 1+ to 3+ | 100** | 100 |
| Low Positive Leukocytes 15 cells/μL | Trace | 99 | 100 |
| Low Positive Nitrite (0.1 mg/dL) | Negative | 100 | 100 |
*68% of results for the Medium control were observed as +1; the remaining 32% of results were within +/- one color block.
**85% of results for the High control were observed as +2; the remaining 15% of results were within +/- one color block.
{4}
Nitrite Results:
| Control Sample | Expected Value | % correct (expected value) | Replicates |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Negative | Negative | 100% | 100 |
| Medium | Positive | 100% | 100 |
| High | Positive | 100% | 100 |
| Low Positive Leukocytes (15 cells/μL) | Negative | 100% | 100 |
| Low Positive Nitrite (0.1 mg/dL) | Positive | 100% | 100 |
In a second precision study, five iPhone 6 devices with the App installed were each tested with five urine based control solutions; negative, trace leukocytes (near the clinical decision point), low positive nitrite (near the clinical decision point), medium leukocytes and nitrite, and high leukocytes and nitrite. 25 replicates were tested for each device with each control solution (Negative, Medium, High, Low Positive Leukocytes (15 cells/ $\mu$ L), and Low Positive Nitrite (0.1 mg/dL). All results were within expected values.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The lower limit of the device's reportable range is described in section d (detection limit). Device performance across the range is described in section a (precision/reproducibility).
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
No traceability is claimed.
The sponsor claims that the device is stable for 18 months when stored at $15 - 30\mathrm{C}^{\circ}$
The sponsor instructs the user to use the strip immediately after the foil pouch is opened.
d. Detection limit:
A sensitivity study was performed in-house to evaluate the lower limits of detection of the Scanostics UTI Check application for each analyte. Negative urine was spiked to known concentrations of each analyte and diluted to the analyte concentrations described in the table below. 30 replicates were obtained for each concentration. The limit of detection was defined as the lowest concentration tested where at least $80\%$ of results yielded the trace result for leukocytes or the positive result for nitrite. The results are summarized below:
{5}
Limit of Detection - Leukocytes:
| Leucocyte Concentration | Negative | Trace | Limit of Detection |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 15 cells/μL | 0% | 100% | |
| 11.25 cells/μL | 17% | 83% | * |
| 7.5 cells/μL | 80% | 20% | |
The lower limit of detection for leukocytes was found to be 11.25 cells/ $\mu \mathrm{L}$
Limit of Detection - Nitrite:
| Nitrite Concentration | Negative | Positive | Limit of Detection |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0.1 mg/dL | 0% | 100% | |
| 0.075 mg/dL | 0% | 100% | |
| 0.05 mg/dL | 3% | 97% | |
| 0.04 mg/dL | 3% | 97% | * |
| 0.035 mg/dL | 27% | 73% | |
| 0.030 mg/dL | 73% | 27% | |
The lower limit of detection for nitrite was found to be $0.04\mathrm{mg / dL}$
# e. Analytical specificity:
The CLSI Guideline EP7-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry, Approved Guideline - Second Edition (2005) was referenced in designing the protocol for specificity testing. 31 possible exogenous interferences were added to negative urine, leukocyte positive urine and nitrite positive urine pools and tested using the Scanostics UTI Check Application.
First, four pools of urine were prepared; negative urine, low positive leukocyte urine (15 cells/μL), high positive leukocyte urine (500 cells/uL), and low positive nitrite urine (0.1 mg/dL). Stock solutions of the interferents were then added to the negative and positive urine pools. Five replicates were obtained for each pool and the results of the urine pools spiked with interfering agents were compared with the results of the unspiked samples. Where interference was detected, dilutions were made to determine the interference threshold.
No interference was observed for the following compounds at the concentrations evaluated below:
| Substance | Concentration | Interference Effect |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Ascorbic Acid | 75 mg/dL | No effect |
| Creatine | 10 mg/dL | No effect |
| Creatinine | 400 mg/dL | No effect |
| Fructose | 100 mg/dL | No effect |
| Galactose | 80 mg/dL | No effect |
| Hemoglobin | 20 mg/dL | No effect |
| Lactose | 10 mg/dL | No effect |
{6}
| Substance | Concentration | Interference Effect |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Potassium Chloride | 1500 mg/dL | No effect |
| Riboflavin | 10 mg/L | No effect |
| Sodium Bicarbonate | 1500 mg/dL | No effect |
| Sodium Chloride | 6000 mg/dL | No effect |
| Sodium Phosphate | 500 mg/dL | No effect |
| Urea | 4000 mg/dL | No effect |
| Uric acid | 150 mg/dL | No effect |
| IgG | 25 mg/dL | No effect |
| Ammonium Chloride | 200 mg/dL | No effect |
| Glycine | 450 mg/dL | No effect |
| Lithium Acetoacetate | 60 mg/dL | No effect |
| Sodium Acetate | 25 mg/dL | No effect |
| Sodium Nitrate | 10 mg/dL | No effect |
| Theophylline | 100 mg/L | No effect |
For the following compounds, interference was observed as described at the concentrations tested below for either leukocytes (LEU) or nitrite (NIT):
| Substance | Maximum Concentration Not Affecting Test | Interference Effect |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Albumin | 200 mg/dL | False negative results observed for Trace LEU samples at albumin > 200 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin | 4 mg/dL | False negative results for Large LEU samples at bilirubin > 4 mg/dL |
| Calcium Chloride | 200 mg/dL | False negative results observed for Trace LEU samples at calcium chloride > 200 mg/dL |
| Glucose | 1500 mg/dL | False negative results observed for Trace and Large LEU samples at calcium chloride > 200 mg/dL |
| Oxalic Acid | 35 mg/dL | False negative results observed for Trace LEU samples at oxalic acid > 35 mg/dL |
| Sodium Nitrite | 0 mg/dL | False positive results for NIT samples at sodium nitrite > 0.04 mg/dL |
| Blood | 0.01% | False positive results for Trace LEU samples at blood at > 0.1%; false positive results for NIT |
{7}
8
| Substance | Maximum Concentration Not Affecting Test | Interference Effect |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | samples at blood > 0.01%. |
| Citric Acid | 62.5 mg/dL | False negative results observed for Trace LEU samples at citric acid > 62.5 mg/dL |
| Phenazopyridine | 3 mg/dL | False positive results for NIT samples at phenazopyridine > 3 mg/dL |
The possible interference of certain endogenous analytes commonly tested in urine on Leukocyte and Nitrite was tested with protocols following the recommendations in CLSI Guideline EP7-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry, Approved Guideline – Second Edition (2005). Each possible interfering substance was tested at three different concentrations in 10 replicates. Each analyte was first tested at a specific concentration without the interfering substance present, and then again with the interfering substance present. The results are summarized below:
Effect of Nitrite on Leukocytes:
| Nitrite Concentration (mg/dL) | Leukocyte Concentration (cells/μL) Expected | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Negative (0) | Trace (15) | Small (70) | Moderate (125) |
| Positive (0.1) | Negative | Trace | Small | Moderate |
| Positive ++ (10) | Negative | Trace | Small | Moderate |
The sponsor claims that nitrite does not affect the leukocyte results.
Effect of Leukocytes on Nitrite:
| Leukocyte concentration (cells/μL) | Nitrite Concentration (mg/dL) Expected | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Negative (0) | Positive (0.1) | Positive (1.0) | Positive (10) |
| Small (70) | Negative | Positive | Positive ++ | Positive ++ |
| Moderate (125) | Negative | Positive | Positive ++ | Positive ++ |
The sponsor claims that leukocytes do not affect the nitrite results.
{8}
Effect of pH on Leukocytes:
| pH | Leukocyte Concentration (cells/μL) Expected | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Negative (0) | Trace (15) | Small (70) | Moderate (125) |
| 5.0 | Negative | Trace | Small | 9/10 Moderate 1/10 Small |
| 6.5 | Negative | Trace | Small | Moderate |
| 8.0 | Negative | Trace | Small | 9/10 Moderate 1/10 Small |
The sponsor claims that pH does not affect the leukocyte test.
Effect of pH on Nitrite:
| pH | Nitrite Concentration (mg/dL) Expected | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Negative (0) | Positive (0.1) | Positive (1.0) | Positive (10) |
| 5.0 | Negative | Positive | Positive ++ | Positive ++ |
| 6.5 | Negative | Positive | Positive ++ | Positive ++ |
| 8.0 | Negative | Positive | Positive ++ | Positive ++ |
The sponsor claims that pH does not affect the nitrite test.
Effect of Specific Gravity (SG) on Leukocytes:
| Specific Gravity | Leukocyte Concentration (cells/μL) Expected | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Negative (0) | Trace (15) | Small (70) | Moderate (125) |
| 1.005 | Negative | Trace | Small | Moderate |
| 1.015 | Negative | Trace | Small | 9/10 Moderate 1/10 Large |
| 1.030 | Negative | 6/10 Trace 4/10 Negative | 2/10 Small 8/10 Trace | 6/10 Small 4/10 Trace |
The sponsor claims that SG causes negative interference for leukocyte results at $\mathrm{SG} \geq 1.030$ .
Effect of Specific Gravity on Nitrite:
| Specific Gravity | Nitrite Concentration (mg/dL) Expected | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Negative (0) | Positive (0.1) | Positive (1.0) | Positive (10) |
| 1.005 | Negative | Positive | Positive ++ | Positive ++ |
| 1.015 | Negative | Positive | Positive ++ | Positive ++ |
| 1.030 | Negative | Positive | Positive ++ | Positive ++ |
The sponsor claims that SG does not affect the nitrite test.
To address the observed interferences, the labeling indicates that dehydration (high
{9}
SG), antibiotics, blood, and dye-containing drugs (such as Pyridium, Azo Gantrisin, and Azo Gantanol), as well as albumin, bilirubin, calcium chloride, citric acid, glucose, and oxalic acid may interfere with results.
f. Assay cut-off:
See detection limit, above.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Three sites were selected to perform the comparison studies. 159 lay users were recruited to test the Scanostics UTI Check application test system. Laypersons performed one test with the Scanostics UTI Check application using midstream urine collection and then collected a sample of their urine for comparison testing by healthcare professionals (HCPs). HCPs then performed the test using the predicate method.
In order to evaluate an adequate number of leukocyte and nitrite positive samples, 25 additional users tested their own midstream samples as well as four additional blinded, unaltered urine samples, for a total of 125 additional samples. All samples were also tested by an HCP using the predicate method.
Additionally, 14 positive samples were prepared by spiking negative urine with esterase and with sodium nitrite. Each sample was masked and given to one lay user (naïve to the test method) for testing.
A total of 298 samples were tested by 184 lay users. The results obtained by the lay users using the candidate device compared to the results obtained by the HCPs using the predicate device are summarized below:
10
{10}
Results from 184 lay users testing their own unaltered samples– Leukocytes:
| Predicate result
Scanosics Result | Large (3+) | Moderate (2+) | Small (1+) | Trace | Negative | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Large (3+) | 7 | 1 | | | | 8 |
| Moderate (2+) | 2 | 6 | 1 | | | 9 |
| Small (1+) | | | 12 | 4 | | 16 |
| Trace | | | 1 | 22 | 11 | 34 |
| Negative | | | | 2 | 115 | 117 |
| Total | 9 | 7 | 14 | 28 | 126 | 184 |
| % Agreement (Exact Match) | 77.8 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 78.6 | 91.3 | 88.0% |
| % Agreement (+/- Color Block) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100.0% |
Results from 184 lay users testing their own unaltered samples– Nitrite:
| Predicate Result
Scanosics Result | Positive | Negative | Overall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Positive | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| Negative | | 174 | 174 |
| e | 8 | 176 | 184 |
| % Agreement (Exact Match) | 100% | 98.9% | 98.9% |
| % Agreement (+/- Color Block) | 100% | 100% | 100% |
{11}
Results from all samples– Leukocytes:
| Predicate Result
Scanosics Result | Large (3+) | Moderate (2+) | Small (1+) | Trace | Negative | Overall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Large (3+) | 16 | 2 | | | | 18 |
| Moderate (2+) | 2 | 19 | 2 | | | 23 |
| Small (1+) | | | 23 | 4 | | 27 |
| Trace | | | 1 | 48 | 19 | 68 |
| Negative | | | | 2 | 160 | 162 |
| Total | 18 | 21 | 26 | 54 | 179 | 298 |
| % Agreement (Exact Match) | 88.9% | 90.5% | 88.5% | 88.9% | 89.4% | 89.3% |
| % Agreement (+/- 1 Color Block) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Results from all samples – Nitrite:
| Predicate Result
Scanosics Result | Positive | Negative | Overall |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Positive | 69 | 4 | 73 |
| Negative | | 225 | 225 |
| Total | 69 | 229 | 298 |
| % Agreement (Exact Match) | 100% | 98.8% | 98.7% |
| % Agreement (+/- Color Block) | 100% | 100% | 100% |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable. This device is intended to be used only with urine samples from a midstream collection.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
{12}
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Urine from normal healthy subjects should contain no leukocytes or nitrite. The following information is provided in the labeling:
| Leukocyte Result | Nitrite Result | Meaning of Your Result |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Negative (-) | Negative (-) | No sign of UTI detected. Consult a physician or health professional if you still have symptoms. There are some cases of UTI that the test may not detect. |
| | Positive (+) | Results suggest a sign of UTI. Consult a physician or health professional immediately. |
| Trace (+/-) | Negative (-) | Results suggest additional testing is required. Consult a physician or healthcare professional if you have symptoms. If not, test again the following day using a new strip. If you get another trace Leukocyte result or if you have symptoms, consult a physician or health professional. |
| | Positive (+) | Results suggest a sign of UTI. Consult a physician or health professional immediately. |
| Positive (+,++,+++) | Negative (-) | Results suggest a sign of UTI. Consult a physician or health professional immediately. |
| | Positive (+) | Results suggest a sign of UTI. Consult a physician or health professional immediately. |
# N. Instrument Name:
The representative platform for the application is the iPhone 6 with iOS 9. Compatibility has been validated on both the iPhone 6 and 6S as well as the iPod touch (8th gen) with a minimum iOS requirement of iOS 8.
{13}
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Smartphone image capture, analysis
Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device?
☑ Yes ☐ X or No
Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?
☑ Yes ☐ X or No
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
☑ Yes ☐ X or No
The sponsor has classified their software as a Moderate level of concern. Documentation provided in this submission adequately addresses requirements for this level of concern.
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with these devices. Samples are applied directly to the urinalysis strips as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
The device is intended to be used with a freshly collected urine sample (midstream collection). The App instructs the user to image the test strip (to obtain a test result) no more than two minutes after sample application.
5. Calibration:
Color coded backing card serves to reference the color interpretation of the strip, to normalize for lighting conditions.
6. Quality Control:
Scanostics UTI Check performs two quality control checks on your device’s optics during image processing with a positive and negative control on the backing card.
14
{14}
15
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
1. Dip time study: A dip time study was performed using low positive samples (near clinical decision points) and negative control solutions, including nitrite and leukocyte samples of 15 cells/μL and nitrite samples at 0.1 mg/dL. Test strips were dipped in control samples for 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, and 30 seconds prior to imaging by the App to determine the impact of dipping time on reported results. This study indicated that dipping times between two and 30 seconds did not impact results.
2. Assay time study: An assay time study was performed using positive and negative control solutions, including nitrite and leukocyte samples of 15 cells/μL and nitrite samples at 0.1 mg/dL. In this study, test strips were imaged by the App at 30 second intervals between two and five minutes after sample application. This study indicated that assay times between 2:00 and 2:30 did not did not impact results, and a positive bias (an increase in results of +1 color block) is observed in the leukocyte test at 3:00. Based on these results, a timer is included in the App that instructs the user to image the test strip two minutes after wetting the strip, and will alert the user if the image of the strip has not been captured within three minutes after strip wetting (instructing the user to discard the test strip and start again).
3. Humidity Study: Stability studies were performed at 15 and 30 C° and 20%, 50%, and 70% relative humidity using positive and negative control solutions, including nitrite and leukocyte samples of 15 cells/μL and nitrite samples at 0.1 mg/dL. The sponsor evaluated 20%, 50%, and 70% relative humidity at 30 C°, and evaluated 50% relative humidity at 15 C°. The sponsor determined that samples were stable for 4 hours at the temperature and humidity conditions tested.
4. Lighting conditions: The sponsor evaluated the performance of the device in different lighting conditions (levels ranging from 100 to 500 lux) and demonstrated that the device works as expected in these lighting conditions. The labeling indicates that testing should be performed in a well-lit area. The App warns the user if there are shadows detected.
5. The App can also detect if the strip is misaligned and will warn the user when the strip is not properly aligned.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.