K163484 · Paxman Coolers Limited · PMC · Apr 17, 2017 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K163484
Device Name
Paxman Scalp Cooler
Applicant
Paxman Coolers Limited
Product Code
PMC · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Apr 17, 2017
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4360
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Paxman Scalp Cooler is indicated to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) in women with breast cancer.
Device Story
Mobile, electrically-powered refrigeration unit; circulates refrigerated liquid coolant through silicone cooling cap fitted to patient's head. Healthcare professional uses touch screen GUI to initiate, monitor, and complete cooling process; system maintains pre-set temperature and flow rate. Used in clinical settings during chemotherapy infusion; cooling begins 30 minutes pre-infusion and continues at least 90 minutes post-infusion. Provides timer countdown and status feedback. Reduces scalp temperature to mitigate chemotherapy-induced alopecia; benefits patient by preserving hair, potentially improving quality of life. Two models: ORBIS I (single patient) and ORBIS II (up to two patients).
Clinical Evidence
Prospective, randomized, two-arm clinical study (n=142) comparing Paxman Scalp Cooler (n=95) to no-cooling control (n=47) in women with Stage I-II breast cancer. Primary endpoint: hair preservation success after 4 chemotherapy cycles. Results: 50.5% (48/95) in cooling group vs 0% (0/47) in control group achieved hair preservation (difference 50.5%, 95% CI: 40.5%-60.6%, p<0.0001). Safety: 27.7% of patients reported adverse events, all Grade 1 or 2; no serious adverse device events reported.
Technological Characteristics
Mobile refrigeration unit; silicone cooling caps; proprietary liquid coolant. Temperature range: -15°C to 5°C. Touch screen GUI. Electrical safety: ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1. Electromagnetic compatibility: IEC 60601-1-2. Biocompatibility: ISO 10993-1. Software: IEC 62304. Connectivity: Standalone unit with integrated controller.
Indications for Use
Indicated for women with Stage I-II breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced alopecia.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A scalp cooling system to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced alopecia is a prescription device intended to reduce the frequency and severity of alopecia during chemotherapy in which alopecia-inducing chemotherapeutic agents are used.
Special Controls
*Classification* —Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device meets all design specifications and performance requirements, and that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. This information must include testing to demonstrate accuracy of the temperature control mechanism.
(2) Performance testing must demonstrate the electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety of the device.
(3) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
(4) The patient contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible. Material names must be provided.
(5) Labeling must include the following:
(i) A statement describing the potential risk of developing scalp metastasis.
(ii) Information on the patient population and chemotherapeutic agents/regimen for which the device has been demonstrated to be effective.
(iii) A summary of the non-clinical and/or clinical testing pertinent to use of the device.
(iv) A summary of the device technical parameters, including temperature cooling range and duration of cooling.
(v) A summary of the device- and procedure-related adverse events pertinent to use of the device.
(vi) Information on how the device operates and the typical course of treatment.
(6) Patient labeling must be provided and must include:
(i) Relevant contraindications, warnings, precautions, and adverse effects/complications.
(ii) Information on how the device operates and the typical course of treatment.
(iii) Information on the patient population for which there is clinical evidence of effectiveness.
(iv) The potential risks and benefits associated with use of the device.
(v) Postoperative care instructions.
(vi) A statement describing the potential risk of developing scalp metastasis.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized representation of three human profiles facing right, stacked on top of each other. Above the profiles is the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged in a circular fashion.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
April 17, 2017
Paxman Coolers Limited % Richard Vincins Vice President, QA/RA Emergo Global Consulting, LLC 2500 Bee Cave Road, Building 1, Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78746
Re: K163484
Trade/Device Name: Paxman Scalp Cooler Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4360 Regulation Name: Scalp Cooling System Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PMC Dated: March 17, 2017 Received: March 21, 2017
Dear Richard Vincins:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device
{1}------------------------------------------------
related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely.
Jennifer R. Stevenson -S
For Binita S. Ashar, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.S. Director Division of Surgical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K163484
Device Name Paxman Scalp Cooler
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Paxman Scalp Cooler is indicated to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) in women with breast cancer.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
# Paxman Scalp Cooler
# K163484
# 1. Submission Sponsor
Paxman Coolers Limited
International House
Penistone Road
Fenay Bridge
Huddersfield
HD8 OLE
United Kingdom
Contact: Richard PAXMAN
Title: Managing Director
# 2. Submission Correspondent
Emergo Global Consulting, LLC
2500 Bee Cave Road
Building 1, Suite 300
Austin, TX 78746
Office Phone: (512) 327.9997
Contact: Carrie Hetrick, Senior Consultant, RA
Email: project.management@emergogroup.com
#### 3. Date Prepared
17th March, 2017
{4}------------------------------------------------
### 4. Device Identification
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | Paxman Scalp Cooler |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common/Usual Name: | Scalp Cooling System |
| Classification Name: | Scalp Cooling System to Reduce the Likelihood of Chemotherapy-Induced<br>Alopecia |
| Regulation Number: | 878.4360 |
| Product Code: | PMC, Scalp Cooling System |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Classification Panel: | General and Plastic Surgery |
#### 5. Legally Marketed Predicate Device
DEN150010, DigniCap™ Scalp Cooling System, Dignitana AB
#### 6. Device Description
The Paxman Scalp Cooler is a self-contained, mobile, electrically-powered refrigeration unit that circulates a refrigerated liquid coolant, at a pre-set temperature and flow rate, through a cooling cap, which is fitted to the top of the patient's head and connected to the refrigeration unit by a pair of coolant lines. A touch screen controller with a menu-driven, graphical user interface, integrated into the refrigeration unit, allows the healthcare professional to initiate, monitor, and complete the scalp cooling process.
Two (2) models of the Paxman Scalp Cooler are available:
- . ORBIS I – featuring one pair of coolant lines for attaching a single cooling cap; designed for scalp cooling of one patient at a time; and,
- . ORBIS II – featuring two pairs of coolant lines for attaching two cooling caps; designed for scalp cooling of up to two (2) patients at a time.
The touch screen displays a menu-driven Graphical User Interface (GUI) that provides information to the user concerning the operational status of the scalp cooling unit; it also prompts the user to initiate certain actions relating to the scalp cooling procedure and provides a timer count-down function for scalp cooling sessions. The GUI does not, however, directly control the scalp cooling process as there are pre-established programs for the scalp cooling administration.
The touch screen controller provides feedback to the user concerning the status of the Paxman Scalp Cooler as it relates to achievement of the pre-set temperature of the coolant, operation of the recirculation pump and connection of a cooling cap to the software also provides a timer count-down function for the initiated pre- and post-infusion cooling procedure. At the pre
{5}------------------------------------------------
set time, a message is displayed on the touch screen and a buzzer sounds to alert the fact that the scalp cooling time is complete.
#### 7. Indication for Use Statement
The Paxman Scalp Cooler is indicated to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) in women with breast cancer.
#### 8. Substantial Equivalence Discussion
The following table compares the Paxman Scalp Cooler to the predicate device with respect to indications for use, principles of operation, technological characteristics, materials, and performance testing. The comparison of the devices provides more detailed information regarding the basis for the determination of substantial equivalence. The subject device does not raise any new issues of safety or effectiveness based on the similarities to the predicate device.
| Manufacturer | Paxman Coolers Limited | Dignitana AB | Significant Differences |
|-------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name | Paxman Scalp Cooler | DigniCap™ Scalp Cooling System | |
| 510(k) Number | Not assigned | DEN150010 | Not applicable |
| Product Code | PMC | PMC | Same |
| Regulation Number | 878.4360 | 878.4360 | Same |
| Regulation Name | Scalp Cooling System | Scalp Cooling System | Same |
| Indications for Use | The Paxman Scalp Cooler is indicated to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) in women with breast cancer. | The DigniCap™ Scalp Cooling System is indicated to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy - induced alopecia in women with breast cancer. | Same |
| Mechanism of Action | The unit is a compact, mobile refrigeration unit which circulates liquid coolant at low pressure through a special cooling cap on the patient's head. The circulation of the refrigerated coolant | The Dignitana DigniCap™ Scalp Cooling System consists of a computer controlled system that includes a refrigerated tank containing the cooling agent. The liquid coolant circulates from the cooling unit to and | Same |
| Manufacturer | Paxman Coolers Limited | Dignitana AB | Significant<br>Differences |
| Trade Name | Paxman Scalp Cooler | DigniCap™ Scalp Cooling<br>System | |
| | through the cap extracts<br>heat from the patient's<br>scalp maintaining<br>temperature. | through the channels of<br>the cap and back to the<br>cooling unit. The<br>circulation of the<br>refrigerant extracts heat<br>from the patient's scalp<br>maintaining a<br>temperature. | |
| Technology<br>Overview | The unit is composed of<br>a main unit that<br>contains the<br>refrigeration<br>components, touch<br>screen controller, and<br>coolant tank. There are<br>detachable coolant lines<br>with covers, detachable<br>cooling cap with covers,<br>and proprietary coolant. | The DigniCap Cooling<br>System consists of a<br>refrigerator unit with<br>integral control system<br>operated via a touch<br>screen monitor and<br>capable of controlling<br>two separate cooling<br>caps. The scalp cooling is<br>performed in conjunction<br>with a silicone inner cap,<br>outer neoprene cap, and<br>the liquid coolant which<br>are proprietary. | Same |
| Patient Population | Women with Stage I - II<br>breast cancer<br>undergoing neoadjuvant<br>or adjavent<br>chemotherapy. | Women with Stage I - II<br>breast cancer undergoing<br>neoadjuvant or adjavent<br>chemotherapy. | Same |
| Set Cooling Time | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Pre/Post Cooling<br>Time | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Material of Cooling<br>Cap | Silicone | Silicone | Same |
| Size of Cooling Cap | Small, Medium, Large | Extra Small, Small,<br>Medium, and Large | Similar; there is an<br>additional Extra Small<br>cooling cap provided<br>for predicate does not |
| Manufacturer | Paxman Coolers Limited | Dignitana AB | Significant<br>Differences |
| Trade Name | Paxman Scalp Cooler | DigniCap™ Scalp Cooling<br>System | |
| Number of Cooling<br>Caps/Lines | 2 | 2 | Same |
| Quick Disconnect | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Coolant<br>Temperature Range | -15°C to 5°C | -15°C to 5°C | Same |
| Refrigerant Type | Proprietary coolant | Proprietary coolant | Similar; both are<br>refrigerants that are<br>used for cooling<br>purposes.<br>Performance testing<br>of the system does<br>not raise any<br>additional questions<br>for safety and efficacy. |
| Coolant Refilling | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Sterile | No | No | Same |
| Single-Use | No | No | Same |
| Touch Screen<br>Interface | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Software Controlled | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Complies with ISO<br>10993-1 | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Electrical Safety<br>Testing Passed | Yes | Yes | Same |
#### Table 5A - Comparison of Characteristics
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
# 9. Non-Clinical Performance Data
As part of demonstrating safety and effectiveness of Paxman Scalp Cooler and in showing substantial equivalence to the predicate devices that are subject to this 510(k) submission, Paxman Coolers Limited completed a number of non-clinical performance tests. The Paxman Scalp Cooler meets all the
{8}------------------------------------------------
requirements for overall design, labeling, biocompatibility, software testing, and electrical safety results confirming that the design output meets the design inputs and specifications for the device.
The Paxman Scalp Cooler passed all the testing in accordance with internal requirements, national standards, and international standards shown below to support substantial equivalence of the subject device:
- . Biocompatibility testing of Cooling Cap per ISO 10993-1: Passed
- Electrical safety testing per ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1: Passed
- Electromagnetic Disturbance (EMD) testing per IEC 60601-1-2: Passed
- Software verification and validation testing per IEC 62304/FDA Guidance
- . Useable life of the device of five (5) years and Cooling Cap shelf life of three (3) years
- Storage and Transport Testing conformance to ISTA requirements: Passed
- . Heat extraction validation testing
- Scalp temperature validation testing
- Performance testing of coolant management: Passed
- . Leak testing of Cooling Cap: Passed
# 10. Clinical Performance Data
A clinical study was conducted to evaluate safety and efficacy of the Paxman Scalp Cooler to physically cool the scalp of patients who are undergoing chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer, in order to reduce chemotherapy-induced alopecia. The study was a prospective, randomized, two-arm study of women with Type I-II breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy treatment with Paxman Scalp Cooler used as the cooling arm and no cooling serving as the control group. The overall summary of the clinical study is shown:
- . Study Design: The study was a prospective, randomized, two-arm study of women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy to evaluate effect of scalp cooling to reduce chemotherapyinduced alopecia.
- . Study Objectives: To demonstrate that the Paxman Scalp Cooler is safe and effective in reducing chemotherapy-induced alopecia in women with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy
- Comparing success in hair preservation, between the Paxman Scalp Cooler (cooling arm) O and control group (no cooling arm) after four (4) cycles of chemotherapy
- To estimate the rate of significant cold-related anticipated adverse device effects O (AADEs) self-reported by subjects during treatment with the Paxman Scalp Cooler
{9}------------------------------------------------
- . Study Endpoints: All eligible study subjects who receive at least one (1) cycle of chemotherapy will be evaluable for hair-preservation response: success in hair preservation by a Healthcare Professional, success in hair preservation by subject self and Oncologist, use of wigs and/or hair wrap, and Quality of Life using three questionnaires.
- . Study Procedure: All subjects are randomized to cooling arm will undergo scalp cooling using the Paxman Scalp Cooler, during and after administration of each chemotherapy session, for four (4) complete cycles of full-dose anthracycline or taxane based chemotherapy that are specified in inclusion criteria for the chemotherapy treatment regimen.
Scalp cooling will begin a minimum of 30 minutes pre-infusion administration of chemotherapy. Cooling commences for the duration of chemotherapy treatment administered by the Paxman Scalp Cooler. Temperature will be maintained through scalp cooling with the device a minimum of 90 minutes post-infusion.
At baseline and after each cycle, subjects will have an alopecia assessment by a delegated physician or nurse practitioner and a second independent healthcare provider who is blinded to study treatment. Each subject will be followed up 2-3 weeks after completion of each chemotherapy cycle, and 2-4 weeks after completion of the final chemotherapy cycle.
- Number of Patients/Sites: Number of evaluable subject is 142 (one hundred forty two) that were analyzed based on the intent to treat (ITT) population across six (6) clinical sites in the United States.
- Study Treatment: Duration of device use depends on the type of chemotherapy the subject is receiving; subject is assessed after each cycle of chemotherapy (maximum of 8 cycles).
- Results Effectiveness: Of the 142 evaluable patients, 95 were in the cooling group and 47 were in the control group (no cooling). Results show 48 (50.5%) out of 95 in the cooling group and 0 (0%) out of 47 in the control group had hair preservation. The success rate difference between the two groups was 50.5%, 95% Cl: 40.5% - 60.6%, one-tailed p-value from the Fisher's exact test was <0.0001.
- Results Safety: Total of 28 patients (27.7%) had 54 adverse events in combination through all treatment sessions. All adverse events were grade 1 or 2. There was no serious adverse device event.
Results of the clinical investigation support the safety, efficacy, and indications for use of the Paxman Scalp Cooler in reducing chemotherapy-induced alopecia by achieving less than 50% hair loss compared with no scalp cooling after chemotherapy treatment. Clinical study conclusion confirms that the device is safe and effective as used according to the instructions for use.
# 11. Statement of Substantial Equivalence
By definition, a device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device has the same intended use and the same technological characteristics as the previously cleared predicate device. Based on the comparison and analysis above, the Paxman Scalp Cooler is determined to be substantially
{10}------------------------------------------------
equivalent to the referenced predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.