AtriClip PRO, PRO2, and PRO V LAA Exclusion System devices with preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip
K163261 · AtriCure, Inc. · FZP · May 19, 2017 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K163261
Device Name
AtriClip PRO, PRO2, and PRO V LAA Exclusion System devices with preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip
Applicant
AtriCure, Inc.
Product Code
FZP · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
May 19, 2017
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4300
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K163261 · May 19, 2017
AtriClip PRO, PRO2, and PRO V LAA Exclusion System devices with preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip
AtriCure, Inc.
Published clinical literature
The sponsor utilized a published literature review to provide additional evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of the AtriClip LAA Exclusion System when placed via video-assisted thoracoscopic procedures.
Literature review; LAA occlusion; Video-assisted thoracoscopic procedure
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Published literature review of AtriClip LAA Exclusion System; Literature review; Follow-up/Duration: 3-12 months post-operatively
Patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic procedures of the left atrial appendage; Sample Size: Not specified (part of a total cohort of 129 patients across IDE studies and literature)
Not applicable for this study
LAA occlusion directly following deployment; LAA exclusion post-operatively
Indications for Use
The AtriClip LAA Exclusion System is indicated for the occlusion of the heart's left atrial appendage, performed under direct visualization and in conjunction with other cardiac surgical procedures. Direct visualization, in this context, requires that the surgeon is able to see the heart directly, with or without assistance from a camera, endoscope, etc., or other appropriate viewing technologies.
Device Story
AtriClip LAA Exclusion System is a single-use, sterile, self-closing implantable clip preloaded on a disposable applier. Device used by surgeons during cardiac procedures to occlude the left atrial appendage (LAA). Surgeon operates applier to place clip at LAA base; clip applies uniform pressure to ensure secure, permanent occlusion. Available in 35mm, 40mm, 45mm, and 50mm lengths to accommodate varying LAA sizes. Provides mechanical exclusion of LAA to reduce risk of thrombus formation. Used in OR settings under direct visualization (with or without endoscopic assistance).
Clinical Evidence
Evidence includes multiple IDE clinical studies (Stroke G110145, Hybrid DEEP G090279, Staged DEEP G120056) and published literature. Total of 129 patients implanted via video-assisted thoracoscopic procedures. Primary endpoints: LAA occlusion post-deployment (99% success, 128/129) and LAA exclusion at 3-12 months post-op (96% success, 56/58). Zero device-related serious adverse events reported.
Technological Characteristics
Implantable clip and disposable applier (handle, shaft, suture anchors, end-effector). Clip lengths: 35-50 mm. Mechanical self-closing mechanism providing uniform pressure. Sterile, single-use. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for occlusion of the left atrial appendage in patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures requiring direct visualization of the heart.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An implantable clip is a clip-like device intended to connect internal tissues to aid healing. It is not absorbable.
Predicate Devices
AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with Preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip (K093679)
Reference Devices
AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with Preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip (K122276)
AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with Preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip (K131107)
AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with Preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip (K142120)
AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with Preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip (K150996)
AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with Preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove PRO-V Clip (K153500)
AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with Preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip (K160454)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, overlapping each other to create a sense of depth and connection.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
May 19, 2017
AtriCure Inc. Jonathan McElwee Regulatory Affairs Manger 7555 Innovation Way Mason, Ohio 45040
Re: K163261
Trade/Device Name: AtriClip Pro, Pro2, and Pro V LAA Exclusion Systems With Preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4300 Regulation Name: Implantable Clip Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FZP Dated: April 19, 2017 Received: April 20, 2017
Dear Mr. McElwee:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerelv.
M.A. Hillemann
for
Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K163261
### Device Name
AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip
Indications for Use (Describe)
The AtriClip LAA Exclusion System is indicated for the occlusion of the heart's left atrial appendage, performed under direct visualization and in conjunction with other cardiac surgical procedures.
Direct visualization, in this context, requires that the surgeon is able to see the heart directly, with or without assistance from a camera, endoscope, etc., or other appropriate viewing technologies.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| <div> <input checked="true" type="checkbox"/> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </div> | |
| <div> <input type="checkbox"/> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </div> | |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for AtriCure. The logo is in two colors, blue and orange. The first part of the name, "Atri," is in blue, while the second part, "Cure," is in orange. There is a blue dot in the middle of the "Cure" part of the name. There is a registered trademark symbol next to the word "Cure".
# 510(k) Summary
#### l. Submitter
| Manufacturer: | AtriCure, Inc.<br>7555 Innovation Way<br>Mason, OH 45040<br>P: 513-755-4100<br>F: 513-755-4108 |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Jonathan McElwee, RAC<br>Regulatory Affairs Manager |
| Date Submitted: | 11/18/2016 |
| II. Device | |
| Name of Devices: | AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove® Clip |
| Common Name: | Implantable Clip and Clip Applier |
| Classification Name: | Implantable Clip and Clip Applier (21 CFR 878.4300) |
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | FZP |
#### III. Predicate Device
Predicate Device:
K093679 AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with Preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip
The following reference devices were also used in this submission:
- K122276 AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with Preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip .
- K131107 AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with Preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip ●
- K142120 AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with Preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip ●
- K150996 AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with Preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip
- AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with Preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove PRO-V Clip ● K153500
- K160454 AtriClip LAA Exclusion System with Preloaded Gillinov-Cosgrove Clip ●
{4}------------------------------------------------
### IV. Device Description
The AtriClip LAA Exclusion System consists of a single use, sterile, self-closing, implantable Clip preloaded on a Single Use Clip Applier along with a selection guide. When closed, the Clip applies uniform pressure over the length of the Clip to ensure consistent, reproducible, and secure occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA). The clip is then deployed and is left as a permanent implant. The Clip is available in the following lengths to accommodate different sizes of LAA: 35 mm, 40 mm, 45 mm, and 50 mm.
The Clip Appliers are disposable devices with a handle, shaft, suture anchors, and deployment end-effector containing the Clip.
#### V. Indications For Use
The AtriClip LAA Exclusion System is indicated for the heart's left atrial appendage, performed under direct visualization and in conjunction with other cardiac surgical procedures. Direct visualization, in this context, requires that the surgeon is able to see the heart directly, with or without assistance from a camera, endoscope, etc., or other appropriate viewing technologies.
### VI. Comparison Of Technological Characteristics With The Predicate Device
The AtriClip LAA Exclusion System devices have the following similarities to the technological characteristics of the previously cleared devices.
- The devices have the same intended use "occlusion of the heart's left atrial appendage" ●
- . Same operating principle
- Same fundamental scientific technology
- Same device designs .
- Same materials used
- The results of the verification and validation testing: .
- Demonstrated equivalency in performance o
- O Did not raise any new issues of safety
#### VII. Performance Data
Non-clinical Bench Testing Reliability Testing Usability Testing on a Cadaver Model
## Clinical Studies
AtriCure has collected scientific based evidence from multiple sponsored IDE clinical studies on the use of the AtriClip LAA Exclusion System during video assisted thoracoscopic procedures of the left atrial appendage (LAA). In the IDE Stroke clinical study (G110145) patients were implanted with the AtriClip device via video assisted thoracoscopic procedures without any adverse events. At three months followup, these patients had 100% LAA exclusion.
In addition, AtriCure also conducted two IDE studies, Hybrid DEEP (G090279) and Staged DEEP (G120056), where the AtriClip devices were implanted via using video without any adverse events.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Furthermore, AtriCure performed a published literature review evaluating the use of AtriClip LAA Exclusion System devices, which provided additional evidence the device can be placed safely at the base of the appendage via a video assisted thoracoscopic procedure of the LAA.
In totality of the clinical evidence based on the multiple IDE clinical studies and published clinical literature, 129 total patients were safely implanted during video assisted thoracoscopic procedures of the left atrial appendage.
A review of the IDE clinical studies and published literature evaluated the following endpoints when the Clip was deployed via a video assisted thoracoscopic procedures of the LAA: 1.) LAA occlusion directly following Clip deployment and 2.) LAA exclusion post-operatively. The results demonstrated: 1.) 99% (128/129) of the patients had LAA occlusion directly following Clip deployment and 2.) 96% (56/58) of patients had LAA exclusion evaluated at 3-12months post-operatively.
The IDE EXCLUDE clinical study, included in the original AtriClip 510(k) premarket notification - K093679, demonstrated effectiveness of 95.7% LAA occlusion directly following Clip deployment and 98.4% LAA exclusion 3 months post-operatively.
There were Zero (0) AtriClip device related serious adverse events reported in the clinical studies and published literature.
## Summary
Based on the clinical performance as documented in the clinical studies and published literature, the AtriClip LAA Exclusion System was found to have a safety and effectiveness profile similar to the predicate device. Substantial equivalence was based in part on this information.
#### VIII. Conclusions
The AtriCure sponsored clinical studies, published literature, and bench testing data included in this submission provide evidence demonstrating the AtriClip LAA Exclusion System, as labeled per the Indication for Use, provide A.) clinically significant results and at the same time B.) do not present an unreasonable risk of illness or injury associated with the use of the device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.