3.3 mm Laurimed Microdebrider; 4.0 mm Laurimed Microdebrider
Applicant
Laurimed, LLC
Product Code
ERL · Ear, Nose, Throat
Decision Date
Mar 9, 2017
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 874.4250
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The PolypVac Microdebrider is a shaver system intended for the resection of soft tissue and thin bone as part of the following endoscopic sinus procedures: ethmoidectomy, maxillary antrostomy, polypectomy, turbinectomy / turbinate reduction, sphenoidotomy, and frontal recess dissection.
Device Story
The PolypVac Microdebrider is a single-use, sterile, hand-held shaver system for endoscopic sinus surgery. It consists of a hand-held cutting device, tissue filter, and stylet. The device operates by connecting to a user-supplied vacuum pump and endoscope; suction draws tissue into a side-facing cutting window where an oscillating cutter performs resection. Internal irrigation is routed through the shaver blade to the cutting window to facilitate tissue evacuation. The surgeon operates the device manually, using a trigger on the handle to activate or halt the cutter. The device is used in clinical settings by surgeons to resect soft tissue and thin bone, potentially benefiting patients by enabling precise tissue removal during sinus procedures.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical testing was performed. Evidence consists of bench testing (durability, functionality, dimensional, pull force, and resection rate) and cadaver simulated-use testing, which confirmed the device's ability to perform the indicated procedures without adverse events.
Technological Characteristics
Hand-held shaver system; oscillating cutter mechanism; side-facing cutting window; internal irrigation channel; 3.3 mm and 4.0 mm blade diameters; E-beam sterilization (SAL 10^-6); biocompatible materials evaluated per ISO 10993.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing endoscopic sinus procedures including ethmoidectomy, maxillary antrostomy, polypectomy, turbinectomy/turbinate reduction, sphenoidotomy, and frontal recess dissection for the resection of soft tissue and thin bone.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An ear, nose, and throat electric or pneumatic surgical drill is a rotating drilling device, including the handpiece, that is intended to drive various accessories, such as an ear, nose, and throat bur (§ 874.4140), for the controlled incision or removal of bone in the ear, nose, and throat area.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized graphic of three human profiles facing right, stacked on top of each other. The profiles are connected by flowing lines that resemble a ribbon or banner. The graphic is surrounded by the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged in a circular pattern.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
March 9, 2017
Laurimed LLC Mr. Brian DuBois General Manger 500 Arguello St., Suite 100 Redwood City, CA 94063
Re: K163247
Trade/Device Name: PolypVac Microdebrider Regulation Number: 21 CFR 874.4250 Regulation Name: Ear, Nose, and Throat Electric or Pneumatic Surgical Drill Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: ERL Dated: February 8, 2017 Received: February 9, 2017
Dear Mr. DuBois:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA), You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
Eric A. Mann -S
for Malvina B. Eydelman, M.D. Director Division of Ophthalmic and Ear, Nose and Throat Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K163247
Device Name
PolypVac Microdebrider
# Indications for Use (Describe)
The PolypVac Microdebrider is a shaver system intended for the resection of soft tissue and thin bone as part of the following endoscopic sinus procedures; ethmoidectorny, polypectorny, polypectorny, turbinate reduction, sphenoidotomy, and frontal recess dissection.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
| <input type="checkbox"/> | <input type="checkbox"/> |
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
_ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
# *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary – K163247
#### General Information [807.92(a)(1)] l.
| Name, Address, Phone and Fax | Contact Person |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| Number of Applicant | Alex Gordon |
| Laurimed LLC | Director of Operations |
| 500 Arguello Street, Suite 100 | Laurimed LLC |
| Redwood City, CA 94063 | 500 Arguello Street, Suite 100 |
| Phone: (650) 587-5296 | Redwood City, CA 94063 |
| Fax:(650) 587-3823 | Phone: (650) 587-5230 |
| | Fax: (650) 587-3823 |
## Date Prepared
February 8, 2017
#### II. Device Information [§807.92(a)(2)]
Trade Name: PolypVac Microdebrider Common Name: Microdebrider Classification Name: Ear, nose, and throat electric or pneumatic drill Classification: 21 CFR §874.4250 Product Code: ERL Device Class: Class II
#### lll. Predicate Device [§807.92(a)(3)]
The subject PolypVac Microdebrider is substantially equivalent to the primary predicate, the PolypVac Microdebrider (K161101), and the secondary predicate, the Medtronic Xomed XPS 3000 (K041413).
#### IV. Device Description [§807.92(a)(4)]
The PolypVac Microdebrider is a shaver system intended for the resection of soft tissue and thin bone as part of endoscopic sinus procedures. The system consists of a hand-held cutting device, tissue filter, and stylet. The PolypVac Microdebrider is supplied sterile and is single-use and disposable.
#### V. Indications for Use [§807.92(a)(5)]
The PolypVac Microdebrider is a shaver system intended for the resection of soft tissue and thin bone as part of the following endoscopic sinus procedures: ethmoidectomy, maxillary antrostomy, polypectomy, turbinectomy / turbinate reduction, sphenoidotomy, and frontal recess dissection.
#### VI. Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device [§807.92(a)((6)]
The technological characteristics and principles of operation of the subject PolypVac Microdebrider are substantially equivalent to the PolypVac Microdebrider primary predicate device (K161101) and the Medtronic Xomed XPS 3000 secondary predicate device (K041413).
{4}------------------------------------------------
| Model Name | PolypVac Microdebrider<br>(Primary Predicate) | Xomed XPS 3000<br>(Secondary Predicate) | PolypVac Microdebrider | Rationale for Substantial |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Device Trade Name | PolypVac Microdebrider | XPS 3000 System | PolypVac Microdebrider | Equivalence |
| 510(k) Number | K161101 | K041413 | K163247 | |
| Product Code | ERL | ERL | ERL | Same. |
| Intended Use | Intended for the resection of<br>soft tissue during sinonasal<br>polypectomy. | Intended for the incision and removal of<br>soft and hard tissue or bone in general<br>otorhinolaryngology, head and neck, and<br>otoneurological surgery. | Intended for the resection of soft<br>tissue and thin bone in<br>endoscopic sinus procedures. | Both the subject PolypVac<br>Microdebrider and the Xomed XPS<br>3000 are intended for the resection<br>of soft tissue and thin bone during<br>otorhinolaryngology procedures. |
| Indications for<br>Use | Indicated for the excision of<br>polyps in the nasal<br>passageways and in sinuses<br>for which access has been<br>previously established. | The XPS 3000 is intended for the incision<br>and removal of soft and hard tissue or bone<br>in general otorhinolaryngology, head and<br>neck, and otoneurological surgery.<br>(non-applicable sections removed)<br>Sinus indications include: Septoplasty,<br>removal of septal spurs, POLYPECTOMY,<br>ANTROSTOMY, ETHMOIDECTOMY /<br>sphenoethmoidectomy, frontal sinus<br>trephination and irrigation, frontal sinus drill<br>out, endoscopic DCR, trans-spheniodal<br>procedures, maxillary sinus POLYPECTOMY,<br>circumferential MAXILLARY ANTROSTOMY,<br>choanal atresia, SPHENOIDOTOMY, and<br>medial, lateral, and posterior FRONTAL<br>SINUSOTOMY. (non-applicable sections removed) | The PolypVac Microdebrider is a<br>shaver system intended for the<br>resection of soft tissue and thin<br>bone as part of the following<br>endoscopic sinus procedures:<br>ethmoidectomy, maxillary<br>antrostomy, polypectomy,<br>turbinectomy / turbinate<br>reduction, sphenoidotomy, and<br>frontal recess dissection. | Both the subject PolypVac<br>Microdebrider and the Xomed XPS<br>3000 are indicted for:<br>$\Sigma$ Ethmoidectomy<br>$\Sigma$ Maxillary Antrostomy<br>$\Sigma$ Polypectomy<br>$\Sigma$ Turbinectomy / Turbinate<br>Reduction<br>$\Sigma$ Sphenoidotomy<br>$\Sigma$ Frontal recess dissection |
| Contraindications | None | None | None | Same. |
| Target<br>Population | Patients with accessible<br>sinonasal polyps | Patients in otorhinolaryngology, head and<br>neck, otoneurology, lipoplasty, and<br>orthopedic procedures. | Patients in otorhinolaryngology<br>procedures. | Both the subject PolypVac<br>Microdebrider and the Xomed XPS<br>3000 serve patients who would<br>benefit from otorhinolaryngology<br>procedures. |
| Anatomic Sites | Nose (including accessible<br>sinuses) | Nasal passageways, sinuses, nasopharynx,<br>larynx, ear, head and neck, and various<br>anatomic locations associated with<br>lipoplasty and/or orthopedic procedures. | Nasal passageways and sinuses. | Both the subject PolypVac<br>Microdebrider and the Xomed XPS<br>3000 are intended for use in the<br>nasal passageways and sinuses. |
| Model Name | PolypVac Microdebrider<br>(Primary Predicate) | Xomed XPS 3000<br>(Secondary Predicate) | PolypVac Microdebrider | Rationale for Substantial<br>Equivalence |
| Device Trade Name | PolypVac Microdebrider | XPS 3000 System | PolypVac Microdebrider | |
| 510(k) Number | K161101 | K041413 | K163247 | |
| Target Tissue | Sinonasal Polyps | Various soft and hard tissues encountered<br>during otology, otorhinolaryngology, head<br>and neck, lipoplasty, and orthopedic<br>procedures. | Various soft and hard tissues<br>encountered during<br>otorhinolaryngology procedures. | Both the subject PolypVac<br>Microdebrider and the Xomed XPS<br>3000 are intended for the resection<br>of various soft and hard tissues<br>encountered during<br>otorhinolaryngology procedures. |
| Method of<br>Introduction | Manual placement under<br>visual guidance. | Manual placement under visual guidance. | Manual placement under visual<br>guidance. | Same. |
| Mechanism of<br>Action | Suction from user-supplied<br>vacuum pump draws tissue<br>into side-facing cutting<br>window, tissue excised by<br>oscillating cutter. | Suction from user-supplied vacuum pump<br>draws tissue into side-facing cutting<br>window, tissue excised by oscillating cutter. | Suction from user-supplied<br>vacuum pump draws tissue into<br>side-facing cutting window, tissue<br>excised by oscillating cutter. | Same. |
| Compatibility | User-supplied endoscope,<br>vacuum pump, and sterile<br>irrigant syringe / bag. | User-supplied endoscope, vacuum pump,<br>and sterile irrigant bag. | User-supplied endoscope,<br>vacuum pump, and sterile irrigant<br>syringe / bag. | Same. |
| Design Features | Blade Diameter:<br>3.3 mm and 4.0 mm | Blade Diameter:<br>3.5 mm and 4.0 mm<br>(RAD 12 & 40 Blades) | Blade Diameter:<br>3.3 mm and 4.0 mm | Blades of similar diameter are<br>offered. |
| | Distal Tip:<br>Blunt distal tip with side-<br>facing cutting window. | Distal Tip:<br>Blunt distal tip with side-facing cutting<br>window. | Distal Tip:<br>Blunt distal tip with side-facing<br>cutting window. | Same. |
| | Internal Irrigation:<br>Irrigant routed within the<br>shaver blade to the cutting<br>window, where it is<br>suctioned through the<br>device, facilitating<br>evacuation of excised tissue. | Internal Irrigation:<br>Irrigant routed within the shaver blade to<br>the cutting window, where it is suctioned<br>through the device, facilitating evacuation of<br>excised tissue. | Internal Irrigation:<br>Irrigant routed within the shaver<br>blade to the cutting window,<br>where it is suctioned through the<br>device, facilitating evacuation of<br>excised tissue. | Same. |
| Model Name | PolypVac Microdebrider<br>(Primary Predicate) | Xomed XPS 3000<br>(Secondary Predicate) | PolypVac Microdebrider | Rationale for Substantial<br>Equivalence |
| Device Trade Name | PolypVac Microdebrider | XPS 3000 System | PolypVac Microdebrider | |
| 510(k) Number | K161101 | K041413 | K163247 | |
| Human Factors | Handle fits in the surgeon's<br>hand. Shaver blade extends<br>forward while vacuum and<br>irrigant connections extend<br>backwards.<br><br>Trigger location on side of<br>handle activates and halts<br>the motion of the tissue<br>cutter. | Handle fits in the surgeon's hand. Shaver<br>blade extends forward while vacuum and<br>irrigant connections extend backwards.<br><br>Foot pedal activates and halts the motion of<br>the tissue cutter. | Handle fits in the surgeon's hand.<br>Shaver blade extends forward<br>while vacuum and irrigant<br>connections extend backwards.<br><br>Trigger location on side of handle<br>activates and halts the motion of<br>the tissue cutter. | Same.<br><br>Both the subject PolypVac<br>Microdebrider and the Xomed XPS<br>3000 have controls that must be<br>pressed in order to activate<br>oscillation of the tissue cutter. |
| Materials /<br>Biocompatibility | Biocompatible for its<br>intended use. All contact<br>materials have been<br>evaluated per ISO 10993. | Biocompatible for its intended use.<br>Specific materials not known. | Biocompatible for its intended<br>use. All contact materials have<br>been evaluated per ISO 10993. | Both the subject PolypVac<br>Microdebrider and the Xomed XPS<br>3000 are biocompatible for their<br>intended use. |
| Sterility | E-beam radiation (SAL $10^{-6}$ ). | Ethylene Oxide (single-use shaver blades). | E-beam radiation (SAL $10^{-6}$ ). | Both the subject PolypVac<br>Microdebrider and the shaver blades<br>for the Xomed XPS 3000 are supplied<br>sterile. |
# Table 1: Summary of Technological Characteristics
{5}------------------------------------------------
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### VII. Performance Data [§807.92(b)]
Results of non-clinical testing demonstrate that the subject PolypVac Microdebrider is safe and effective for its intended use and substantially equivalent to the predicates.
### Summary of Nonclinical Testing [§807.92(b)(1)]
Non-clinical testing was conducted to verify / validate the performance of the device and ensure the subject PolypVac Microdebrider functions as intended and meets design specifications. The results demonstrate that the subject PolypVac Microdebrider is substantially equivalent to the predicate device for its intended use and does not raise new issues of safety or effectiveness. Note that the changes presented in this submission have no effect on previously performed packaging validation and biocompatibility validation testing.
| Testing Type | Test Description | Results Supporting Substantial<br>Equivalence |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Bench Testing | Durability/Functionality Testing<br>– Motor and Shaft<br>Dimensional Testing<br>Pull Force Testing - Bond<br>Strength<br>Predicate Comparison -<br>Resection Rate | The subject PolypVac<br>Microdebrider passed all<br>functional testing and met all<br>product specification<br>requirements, thereby<br>demonstrating equivalence to<br>the predicate PolypVac device<br>and suitability to the expanded<br>indications for use. |
| Validation Testing | Cadaver Simulated Use Testing | Simulated use testing was<br>completed successfully, no<br>adverse events were observed.<br>This testing demonstrates that<br>the subject PolypVac<br>Microdebrider is capable of<br>safely performing the following<br>procedures: turbinate reduction<br>/ turbinectomy, uncinectomy /<br>maxillary antrostomy,<br>ethmoidectomy, frontal recess<br>dissection, and sphenoidotomy. |
| | Table 2. Performance Testing and Substantial Equivalence Support | | | | |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
## Summary of Clinical Data [§807.92(b)(2)]
No clinical testing was performed nor necessary in support of this premarket notification.
#### VIII. Conclusion [§807.92(b)(3)]
The subject PolypVac Microdebrider has been carefully compared to a legally marketed device with respect to intended use and technological characteristics. In addition, non-clinical testing was conducted to verify / validate the performance of the device and ensure the subject PolypVac Microdebrider functions as intended and meets design specifications. The comparison and non-clinical results demonstrate that the subject PolypVac Microdebrider is substantially equivalent to the primary predicate, the PolypVac Microdebrider (K161101), and the secondary predicate, the Medtronic Xomed XPS 3000 (K041413), for the updated indication described in this submission.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.