The Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System implants are intended to be used as a construct that assists in normal healing and are not intended to replace normal body structures. The system is intended to stabilize the spinal operative site during posterior fusion procedures, attaching to the spine by means of monoaxial bone screws joined with a connector.
Device Story
Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System is a posterior spinal stabilization construct. System components include monoaxial bone screws and connector assemblies. New two-level components (Two-Level Bone Screws and Two-Level Connectors) allow stabilization of two spinal levels by providing two connector attachment points on a single bone screw, facilitating fusion when inter-pedicular distances are short. Connectors feature a pivoting-slide and spherical bearing for angular compensation; a stepped central plate allows stacking of two connectors. Locking nuts secure connectors to bone screw posts; a calibrated torque wrench ensures proper locking force. Used by surgeons in clinical settings for posterior fusion procedures. Device provides rigid immobilization of spinal segments to assist in healing. Benefits include reduced inventory requirements and ability to stabilize multiple levels with shorter horizontal space.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Mechanical validation performed per ASTM F1798-13 (static flexion-extension, A-P pullout) and ASTM F1717-15 (static compression bending, static torsional bending, dynamic compression bending). Results demonstrate mechanical properties comparable to existing Revolution™ system components and published values for rod systems. Pyrogenicity testing confirms compliance with requirements.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Ti-6Al-4V ELI alloy (ASTM F136). Components: Monoaxial bone screws (4.5-7.5mm diameter, 25-55mm length, cannulated except 4.5mm), connectors with pivoting-slide/spherical bearing, and locking nuts. Energy source: Manual (torque wrench). Connectivity: None. Sterilization: Not specified. Software: None.
Indications for Use
Indicated for pedicle screw fixation of noncervical, posterior spine to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion for: degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, trauma (fracture/dislocation), spinal stenosis, deformities (scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis), tumor, pseudoarthrosis, and failed previous fusion.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
(1) Rigid pedicle screw systems are comprised of multiple components, made from a variety of materials that allow the surgeon to build an implant system to fit the patient's anatomical and physiological requirements. Such a spinal implant assembly consists of a combination of screws, longitudinal members (e.g., plates, rods including dual diameter rods, plate/rod combinations), transverse or cross connectors, and interconnection mechanisms (e.g., rod-to-rod connectors, offset connectors).(2) Semi-rigid systems are defined as systems that contain one or more of the following features (including but not limited to): Non-uniform longitudinal elements, or features that allow more motion or flexibility compared to rigid systems.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls), when intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra; degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment; fracture; dislocation; scoliosis; kyphosis; spinal tumor; and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). These pedicle screw spinal systems must comply with the following special controls:(i) Compliance with material standards;
(ii) Compliance with mechanical testing standards;
(iii) Compliance with biocompatibility standards; and
(iv) Labeling that contains these two statements in addition to other appropriate labeling information:
“Warning: The safety and effectiveness of pedicle screw spinal systems have been established only for spinal conditions with significant mechanical instability or deformity requiring fusion with instrumentation. These conditions are significant mechanical instability or deformity of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine secondary to severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra, degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). The safety and effectiveness of these devices for any other conditions are unknown.”
“Precaution: The implantation of pedicle screw spinal systems should be performed only by experienced spinal surgeons with specific training in the use of this pedicle screw spinal system because this is a technically demanding procedure presenting a risk of serious injury to the patient.”
(2) Class II (special controls), when a rigid pedicle screw system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis other than either severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) at L5-S1 or degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment. These pedicle screw systems must comply with the following special controls:
(i) The design characteristics of the device, including engineering schematics, must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use.
(ii) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate the mechanical function and durability of the implant.
(iii) Device components must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(iv) Validation testing must demonstrate the cleanliness and sterility of, or the ability to clean and sterilize, the device components and device-specific instruments.
(v) Labeling must include the following:
(A) A clear description of the technological features of the device including identification of device materials and the principles of device operation;
(B) Intended use and indications for use, including levels of fixation;
(C) Identification of magnetic resonance (MR) compatibility status;
(D) Cleaning and sterilization instructions for devices and instruments that are provided non-sterile to the end user; and
(E) Detailed instructions of each surgical step, including device removal.
(3) Class II (special controls), when a semi-rigid system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine as an adjunct to fusion for any indication. In addition to complying with the special controls in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (v) of this section, these pedicle screw systems must comply with the following special controls:
(i) Demonstration that clinical performance characteristics of the device support the intended use of the product, including assessment of fusion compared to a clinically acceptable fusion rate.
(ii) Semi-rigid systems marketed prior to the effective date of this reclassification must submit an amendment to their previously cleared premarket notification (510(k)) demonstrating compliance with the special controls in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (v) and paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section.
Spinal Innovations Ascend with Shadow Spinal Fixation System (K013196)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles a stylized caduceus, with three human profiles forming the staff and a wing-like shape above them.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
February 24, 2017
Intelligent Implant Systems, LLC Michael Nutt Chief Operations Officer 3300 International Airport Drive, Suite 1100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28208
Re: K163056
Trade/Device Name: Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3070 Regulation Name: Thoracolumbosacral Pedicle Screw System Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NKB Dated: January 30, 2017 Received: January 31, 2017
Dear Mr. Nutt:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA), You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices. good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{1}------------------------------------------------
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely,
# Mark N. Melkerson -S
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use Statement
510(k) Number (if known): K163056
Device Name: Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System
## Intended Use / Indications for Use:
The Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System is intended for pedicle screw fixation of the noncervical, posterior spine in order to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: (1) degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), (2) spondylolisthesis, (3) trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation), (4) spinal stenosis, (5) deformities or curvatures (i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis), (6) tumor, (7) pseudoarthrosis, (8) failed previous fusion.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) SUMMARY
# Intelligent Implant Systems' Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System Additional Components
| I. Submitter: | Intelligent Implant Systems, LLC<br>3300 International Airport Drive, Suite 1100<br>Charlotte, NC 28208<br>(704) 424-1009<br>(704) 424-1011 (FAX) |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Michael Nutt<br>Chief Operations Officer<br>(704) 424-1009 |
Date Prepared: January 30, 2017
#### II. Device
Name of Device: Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System
Common or Usual Name: Spinal Fixation System
Classification Name: Thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system (21 CFR 888.3070)
Regulatory Class: II
Product Codes: NKB
#### III. Predicate Devices
Primary Predicate: Intelligent Implant Systems: Revolution™ Spinal System (K142939)
Additional Predicates: Intelligent Implant Systems: Revolution™ Spinal System (K160216) Spinal Innovations Ascend with Shadow Spinal Fixation System (K013196)
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Device Description IV.
The previously cleared Intelligent Implant Systems' Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System consists of monoaxial bone screws of various lengths and diameters and a series of connector assemblies for connecting the bone screws.
The standard (one level) Revolution™ Connectors are provided in various lengths and are used to connect the pedicle screws and create a rigid structure. To allow for variation in screw placement, each end of the connector allows for angular compensation. One end allows for full polyaxial angulation, similar to a typical polyaxial screw. The other end has a pivoting-slide that allows for angulation in only one plane along the long axis of the Connector while also sliding within an opening in the Connector. As the distance between two screws is always variable, the slide allows the Connector to compensate for this difference, minimizing inventory. In addition, the Connectors have a threaded locking nut built into each end and each nut fits over the top of a bone screw post. These locking nuts are turned clockwise to tighten. A calibrated torque wrench provides the correct setting for locking the nuts on the bone screw post with sufficient force. The system can be unlocked, if necessary, by turning the locking nuts counterclockwise. To allow for multiple level fusions, four additional components were added to the system (K160216): 1) Transition Bone Screws, 2) Transition Connectors, 3) Two-Post Connectors, and 4) Two-Post Bone Screws. These components provide two connector attachment posts with a single bone screw, which allows the attachment of two connectors (one superior, one inferior) to a single level of the spine. In the case of the Transition Connector, the Transition Bone Screw includes a connector attachment post.
This 510(k) submission adds two types of components to the system: 1) Two-Level Connectors, and 2) Two-Level Bone Screws. These components, when utilized with the previously cleared, standard Revolution™ connectors and standard bone screws, allow stabilization of two levels of the spine. These new Two-Level components allow fusion of two spinal levels when the patient's inter-pedicular distances are very short, by allowing attachment of two connector interfaces to a single bone screw. Like the previously cleared Revolution™ bone screws, the Two-Level Bone Screws are available in diameters of 4.5 mm - 7.5 mm, and in lengths from 25 mm to 55 mm. All screw diameter sizes except for the 4.5mm are cannulated for use with a 1.4 mm k-wire.
The Two-Level Bone Screws have a standard thread for interfacing bone and a partially threaded post designed to engage a standard (one level) connector and a Two-Level Connector. The Two-Level Connector uses the same technology (the pivoting-slide and the spherical bearing), and has a stepped central plate. The step in the plate allows two connectors to stack on top of each other, thus requiring less horizontal space to attach two connectors.
All implant components of the Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System, including the additional components, are manufactured from Ti-6Al-4V ELI alloy, conforming to ASTM F136.
{5}------------------------------------------------
With the addition of the new Two-Level Bone Screws and Connectors, the indications for use remain identical to those of the Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System (K142939 and K160216) predicate devices.
# V. Intended Use / Indications for Use
# Intended Use:
The Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System implants are intended to be used as a construct that assists in normal healing and are not intended to replace normal body structures. The system is intended to stabilize the spinal operative site during posterior fusion procedures, attaching to the spine by means of monoaxial bone screws joined with a connector.
# Indications for Use:
The Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System is intended for pedicle screw fixation of the noncervical, posterior spine in order to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: (1) degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), (2) spondylolisthesis, (3) trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation), (4) spinal stenosis, (5) deformities or curvatures (i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis). (6) tumor, (7) pseudoarthrosis, (8) failed previous fusion.
### VI. Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Devices
The Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System Two-Level components and the predicate devices are all posterior systems utilizing pedicle fixation for stabilization of spinal segments. At a high level, the subject and predicate devices all have the following technological characteristics:
- Bone thread used to implant bone screws in pedicles
- Lock nuts or bolts used to attach bone screws to plates or rods ●
- Torque is applied to lock nuts or bolts to secure assemblies ●
The following technological differences exist between the subject and predicate devices:
- . The additional components provide two connector attachment points at one level, which are then used to attach to multiple connectors instead of using longer plates or rods attached by additional bolts or screws.
{6}------------------------------------------------
### VII. Performance Data
The following performance data were provided on the two-level components in support of the substantial equivalence determination:
# Mechanical Testing:
To validate the strength and safety of the additional Two-Level components, testing was conducted according to methods defined in ASTM F 1798-13, "Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Static and Fatigue Properties of Interconnection Mechanisms and Subassemblies Used in Spinal Arthrodesis Implants", and ASTM F 1717-15, "Standard Test Methods for Spinal Implant Constructs in a Vertebrectomy Model". The types of testing performed on the multilevel components are listed below:
## Testing per ASTM F1798-13
- 1. Static Flexion-Extension Strength
- 2. Anterior Posterior (A-P) Pullout Strength
# Testing per ASTM F1717-15
- 1. Static Compression Bending
- 2. Static Torsional Bending
- 3. Dynamic Compression Bending
The testing revealed that the mechanical properties of the additional Two-Level components are comparable to existing Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System components and to published values for rod systems.
Materials: All components of the Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System Two-Level components are machined from Ti-6Al-4V ELI, conforming to ASTM F-136.
Pyrogenicity Testing: Pyrogen testing of Revolution Spinal System components has shown that the implants conform to pyrogen requirements and batch testing on each production lot will be performed.
Summary: Based on the mechanical testing that was performed and the composition of the device, the Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System two-level components were found to be substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
# VIII. Conclusions
The additional Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System components have a design similar to the predicate devices, function in a similar manner, and their mechanical properties are comparable. Thus, the Revolution™ Spinal Fixation System Two-Level components should perform as intended in the specified use conditions.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.