K163042 · bioMerieux, Inc. · PQZ · Jan 27, 2017 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K163042
Device Name
chromID Strepto B agar
Applicant
bioMerieux, Inc.
Product Code
PQZ · Microbiology
Decision Date
Jan 27, 2017
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.2360
Device Class
Class 1
Indications for Use
chromID® Strepto B agar is a selective chromogenic medium that is intended to aid in the qualitative determination of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization in pregnant women. This medium supports the growth of, but does not differentiate between, hemolytic and non-hemolytic GBS strains. The test is performed on 18-24 hour LIM broth enrichments of vaginal/rectal swabs obtained from pregnant women. chromID® Strepto B agar results can be interpreted after 24 hours incubation with confirmation of characteristic GBS colonies from the media. chromID® Strepto B agar is not intended to diagnose infection nor to guide or monitor treatment for infections. chromID® Strepto B agar does not provide susceptibility results. Subculture to non-selective media should be performed as needed for susceptibility testing. chromID® Strepto B agar is intended for use by laboratory health practitioners in a clinical laboratory.
Device Story
chromID® Strepto B agar is a selective chromogenic culture medium; used for screening Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization in pregnant women. Input: 18-24 hour LIM broth enrichments of vaginal/rectal swabs. Principle: Nutritive base with peptones, chromogenic substrates, and antibiotics; enables GBS identification via spontaneous appearance of pale pink to red colonies. Operation: Manual inoculation and incubation in dark at 35-37°C for 24 hours. Output: Visual observation of colony color. Used in clinical laboratories by health practitioners. Clinical decision-making: Positive results (pink/red colonies) require confirmation via laboratory-approved procedures (e.g., Gram stain, catalase, PYR, latex agglutination, or VITEK® MS). Benefits: Facilitates rapid screening of GBS colonization; supports recovery of both hemolytic and non-hemolytic strains.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective clinical study at three sites with 681 vaginal/rectal specimens. Compared chromID® Strepto B (24h) to Reference Culture Method (subculture to CNA agar). Sensitivity: 97.7% (95% CI: 94.3-99.1%); Specificity: 92.1% (95% CI: 89.4-94.1%). Prevalence of GBS was 25.8%. Analytical studies included reactivity, specificity, interference, and mixed infection recovery.
Technological Characteristics
Selective, differential chromogenic agar medium. Contains antibiotic mixture for suppression of non-target flora and synthetic chromogenic substrates for GBS identification. Form factor: agar plates. Incubation: 35-37°C, aerobic, 24 hours. Manual reading of colony color (pale pink to red).
Indications for Use
Indicated for the qualitative determination of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization in pregnant women using 18-24 hour LIM broth enrichments of vaginal/rectal swabs. Not for diagnosing infection, guiding treatment, or providing susceptibility results.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A selective culture medium is a device that consists primarily of liquid or solid biological materials intended for medical purposes to cultivate and identify certain pathogenic microorganisms. The device contains one or more components that suppress the growth of certain microorganisms while either promoting or not affecting the growth of other microorganisms. The device aids in the diagnosis of disease caused by pathogenic microorganisms and also provides epidemiological information on these diseases.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K163042
B. Purpose for Submission:
To obtain a substantial equivalence determination for chromID Strepto B agar for the qualitative detection of Group B Streptococcus (GBS)
C. Measurand:
Group B Streptococcus (GBS)
D. Type of Test:
Detection of GBS using a selective and differential chromogenic medium
E. Applicant:
bioMérieux, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
chromID® Strepto B agar
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 866.2360
2. Classification:
Class I (non-exempt)
3. Product code:
PQZ
4. Panel:
{1}
Microbiology (83)
## H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
chromID® Strepto B agar is a selective chromogenic medium that is intended to aid in the qualitative determination of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization in pregnant women. This medium supports the growth of, but does not differentiate between, hemolytic and non-hemolytic GBS strains. The test is performed on 18-24 hour LIM broth enrichments of vaginal/rectal swabs obtained from pregnant women. chromID® Strepto B agar results can be interpreted after 24 hours incubation with confirmation of characteristic GBS colonies from the media.
chromID® Strepto B agar is not intended to diagnose infection nor to guide or monitor treatment for infections. chromID® Strepto B agar does not provide susceptibility results. Subculture to non-selective media should be performed as needed for susceptibility testing. chromID® Strepto B agar is intended for use by laboratory health practitioners in a clinical laboratory.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as the Intended Use.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
Presumptive GBS colonies (pale pink to red colonies) should be confirmed by a biochemical or laboratory test.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Not Applicable
## I. Device Description:
chromID Strepto B agar is a selective chromogenic medium used for the screening of Streptococcus agalactiae (S. agalactiae) carriage in pregnant women from LIM broth enrichments of vaginal/rectal swabs. The medium contains antibiotics and synthetic substrates that enable the screening of S. agalactiae by the appearance of pale pink to red colonies. Growth of microorganisms belonging to other species is either inhibited, or if there is growth, the colonies appear as different colored colonies.
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Modified Selective Streptococcus Agar
{2}
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K881577
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | chromID Strepto B Agar (K163042) | Acumedia Modified Selective Streptococcus Agar (K881577) |
| Intended Use | chromID® Strepto B agar is a selective chromogenic medium that is intended to aid in the qualitative determination of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization in pregnant women. This medium supports the growth of, but does not differentiate between, hemolytic and non-hemolytic GBS strains. The test is performed on 18-24 hour LIM broth enrichments of vaginal/rectal swabs obtained from pregnant women. chromID® Strepto B agar results can be interpreted after 24 hours incubation with confirmation of characteristic GBS colonies from the media. chromID® Strepto B agar is not intended to diagnose infection nor to guide or monitor treatment for infections. chromID® Strepto B agar does not provide susceptibility results. Subculture to non-selective media should be performed as needed for susceptibility testing. chromID® Strepto B agar is intended for use by laboratory health practitioners in a clinical laboratory. | Selective agar medium for the isolation and detection of pathogenic Streptococci |
| Reading | Manual | Manual |
| Culture Media Type | Selective agar | Selective agar |
{3}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | chromID Strepto B Agar (K163042) | Acumedia Modified Selective Streptococcus Agar (K881577) |
| Organism(s) Detected | GBS | Streptococcus species |
| Growth Detection | Pale pink to red colonies after 24 hrs | Colonies with/without hemolysis (alpha-hemolysis or beta-hemolysis) |
| Starting Material | Enriched LIM broth culture of vaginal/rectal swabs | Direct Specimen |
| Culture Media Type | Chromogenic agar | No chromogenic substrates |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
## L. Test Principle:
chromID Strepto B agar is a selective, differential medium for the detection of GBS. The ability to detect GBS is based on the presence of an antibiotic mixture that selectively suppresses growth of organisms other than GBS, and the presence of chromogenic substrates that allow the identification of presumptive GBS colonies. Vaginal/rectal swabs from antepartum women are enriched in LIM broth and inoculated directly onto chromID Strepto B agar plates and incubated aerobically at $35^{\circ}$-$37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 24 hrs. The cultures are examined after 24 hrs incubation for the presence of light pink to red colonies, which are then confirmed by biochemical methods. No growth or colonies presenting as other than pale pink to red in appearance should be interpreted as a negative result.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Reproducibility was demonstrated at three sites using a blinded panel of eleven well-characterized strains, which included 10 S. agalactiae strains and one Staphylococcus aureus strain. Both hemolytic and non-hemolytic strains of GBS were tested. At each site, panel members were tested in triplicate at $1.5 \times 10^{3}$ CFU/ml with three different lots of chromID Strepto B agar each day for five days. chromID Strepto B agar plates were observed for the growth of pale pink to red colonies at 24 hrs. All strains produced the expected results with the chromID Strepto B agar at 24 hrs (990/990). Isolates were also plated onto Tryptic Soy Agar with $5\%$ sheep blood to ensure viability and purity of cultures.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not Applicable
{4}
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Quality control (QC) testing was performed at each testing site for growth/color development on chromID Strepto B agar. Two quality control organisms (Streptococcus agalactiae ATCC 12386 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538) were tested at each study site on chromID Strepto B agar for each day of testing. The strains were also subcultured to Trypticase Soy Agar with $5\%$ sheep blood to ensure viability of the organisms. The positive control was tested at a level of $1.5 \times 10^{3}$ CFU/ml, while the negative control was tested at a concentration of $1.5 \times 10^{6}$ CFU/ml. QC testing results provided expected reactions across each testing site (Table 1). The submitted QC data are acceptable.
Table 1. QC Data Summary
| QC Strain | Expected Results after 24 hrs at 35-37°C | QC Results (all sites) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 | No growth | 107/107 |
| Streptococcus agalactiae ATCC 12386 | Growth-pale pink to red colonies | 107/107 |
d. Detection limit:
# Recovery Study
A Recovery Study was performed with two GBS strains (ATCC 12386 and ATCC 13813). After preparing six serial dilutions per strain in saline and plating on chromID Strepto B agar, growth and colony color were evaluated after 18 hrs, 24 hrs, and 48 hrs of incubation at $35^{\circ}\mathrm{C} - 37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . The minimum concentration of GBS reliably detected by chromID Strepto B agar at 24 hrs was $10^{3}$ CFU/ml. At $10^{2}$ CFU/ml, growth of non-characteristic colonies (grey) was observed at 18 hrs incubation for one GBS Strain (ATCC 13813). The use of LIM broth in place of saline did not have an impact on the LoD.
# Analytical Reactivity
A study was conducted to demonstrate the sensitivity of chromID Strepto B agar to detect various GBS strains at a concentration of $10^{3}$ CFU/ml. The study included 20 GBS strains (15 hemolytic, 5 non-hemolytic) from bioMérieux stock and other commercial collection sites as shown in Table 2 below.
Table 2. GBS Panel for Inclusivity Testing
| Panel Member | GBS Serotype | Collection | Strain ID | Hemolytic |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Unknown | ATCC | BAA-2575 | Yes |
| 2 | II | ATCC | 12973 | Yes |
| 3 | Unknown | ATCC | BAA-2576 | Yes |
| 4 | Unknown | ATCC | 12386 | Yes |
{5}
Results demonstrated that 17/20 GBS strains were detected with typical growth on chromID Strepto B agar plates at 24 hrs, while all 20 organisms were detected at 48 hrs. Table 3 below shows results from the Analytical Reactivity Study.
Table 3. Analytical Reactivity Study Results at 18, 24 and 48 hrs.
| Organism | Number of Strains | 18 hr Results | | 24 hr Results | | 48 hr Results | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Growth with Pale Pink to Red Color | % Detected | Growth with Pale Pink to Red Color | % Detected | Growth with Pale Pink to Red Color | % Detected |
| GBS | 20 | 12/20 | 60% (11-hemolytic) (1-non-hemolytic) | 17/20 | 85% (13-hemolytic) (4-non-hemolytic) | 20/20 | 100% |
## Incubation Study
An Incubation Study was performed to determine the effect of various incubation times on the performance of chromID Strepto B agar when tested with ten GBS strains (hemolytic and non-hemolytic) at $10^{3}$ CFU/ml concentration. The growth of characteristic colonies was evaluated every hour from 18-28 hrs and every hour from 44-52 hrs. At the earliest time point (16 hrs), 5 of 10 GBS strains grew as characteristic colonies. By 24 hrs, 8 of 10 GBS strains were detected. All GBS strains were detected after 44 hrs.
## e. Analytical specificity:
## Cross-Reactivity Study
In order to evaluate the performance of chromID Strepto B agar with microorganisms potentially encountered in vaginal/rectal swabs, a Cross-Reactivity Study was completed with 88 strains (gram negative bacteria, gram positive bacteria, and yeast) at approximately $10^{6}$ CFU/ml. Results showed that 68 organisms from the cross-reactivity panel did not grow on chromID Strepto B agar at 24 hrs.
{6}
Table 4 below shows a list of organisms yielding pale pink to red colonies on chromID Strepto B agar after 24 hrs.
Table 4. Cross-Reactivity Study Results
| Incubation Time | Total Strains Tested | # Strains Growing on chromID Strepto B agar | Strains with Pale Pink to Red Colonies | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | # Strains | Organism Name |
| 24 hrs | 88 | 20/88 | 3 | • (1) Streptococcus Group C • (1) Streptococcus mitis • (1) Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC) |
# Interference Study
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of potentially interfering substances commonly found in vaginal/rectal swab specimens on the detection of two GBS strains (hemolytic and non-hemolytic) at approximately $10^{3}$ CFU/ml. Growth of GBS with characteristic colors (pale pink to red) was evaluated in the presence of 15 interfering substances and 6 human samples.
Interfering substances were tested at physiologically or biologically relevant concentrations and mixed with bacterial suspensions. Naproxen sodium (27.5 mg/ml) or topical product (body powder at 0.125 g/ml) may demonstrate partial inhibition of growth on GBS with chromID Strepto B agar. Use of compounds containing the active ingredients below had an inhibitory effect on GBS growth that was unrelated to chromID Strepto B medium performance: nystatin $(10^{4}\mathrm{UI} / \mathrm{ml})$ , hydrocortisone (0.625 mg/ml), aluminum hydroxide (2.125 mg/ml)/magnesium hydroxide (2.250 mg/ml), mesalazine (5 mg/ml), barium sulfate (5 mg/ml), esomeprazole (1 mg/ml), loperamide (1 mg/ml), sennosides (40 mg/ml), metronidazole (25 mg/ml), lidocaine (2.5 mg/ml), econazole (7.2 mg/ml), naproxen sodium (27.5 mg/ml), nonoxynol-9 (one condom/50 ml sterile water; used at 1:1 dilution), benzalkonium chloride (1 wipe/100 ml sterile water; used at 1:1 dilution). Benzalkonium chloride had to be diluted (1/10, 1/100, and 1/1000) before growth was observed on both the control plates (Tryptic Soy Agar with 5% sheep blood) and chromID Strepto B agar plates.
Despite the reduction in growth, characteristic GBS colonies were recovered on chromID Strepto B agar plates in the presence all interfering substance panel members. GBS detection was not significantly affected by vaginal fluid, amniotic fluid, sperm, whole blood, concentrated buffy coat, or stool.
# Mixed Infection Study
A Mixed Infection Study was conducted to demonstrate that high levels of non-target organism will not suppress growth of GBS. Table 5 below shows a list of non-target organisms included in the study.
{7}
Table 5. List of Non-Target Organisms Included in the Mixed Infection Study
| · Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC BAA-1900, KPC) |
| --- |
| · Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 43300, MRSA) |
| · Streptococcus group C (NCTC 8546) |
| · Streptococcus pyogenes (ATCC 19615) |
| · Streptococcus mitis (ATCC 6249) |
| · Lactobacillus sakei (0706001) |
| · Streptococcus anginosus (9501029) |
The panel of seven non-target organisms included strains capable of producing characteristic or non-characteristic colonies after 24 hrs growth on chromID Strepto B medium. Two GBS strains (one hemolytic and one non-hemolytic) were incubated at approximately $10^{3}\mathrm{CFU / ml}$ with each non-target organism. At 24 hrs, both GBS strains were detected in the presence of $10^{8}\mathrm{CFU / ml}$ of non-target strains in the Mixed Infection Study, except in the presence of Streptococcus Group C (NCTC 8546). Growth of the two GBS strains in the presence of the Streptococcus Group C strain $(10^{8}\mathrm{CFU / ml})$ produced purple colonies instead of the expected pale pink to red colonies. Upon decreasing the concentrations of non-target organisms $(10^{3} - 10^{7}\mathrm{CFU / ml})$ , both GBS strains grew as the characteristic colony color. At $10^{8}\mathrm{CFU / ml}$ , 5/7 non-target organisms gave characteristic colonies when grown on chromID Strepto B medium; however, at $10^{5}\mathrm{CFU / ml}$ , it was observed that non-target organisms either did not grow or grew as non-characteristic colonies on chromID Strepto B agar in the presence of both GBS strains at 24 hrs. For those non-target strains yielding pink to red colonies on chromID Strepto B agar, colony features were used to distinguish GBS from the non-target organisms. Results of the study revealed GBS was still detected on chromID Strepto B agar in the presence of high levels of non-target organisms.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not Applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Not Applicable. Compared to Standard Reference Method
b. Matrix comparison:
Not Applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
{8}
chromID Strepto B culture medium was evaluated at three clinical sites. A total of 681 enriched LIM broth cultures (18-24 hrs) of vaginal/rectal swab specimens from pregnant women were included in the performance calculations for chromID Strepto B agar. Five cultures and 60 isolates were excluded because sample acceptance criteria were not met or there were protocol deviations. One culture was excluded because S. agalactiae was not confirmed for one of two characteristic colonies recovered on chromID Strepto B medium from the same culture sample.
All enriched LIM broth cultures were inoculated onto the following media:
- chromID Strepto B agar
- Columbia blood agar with Colistin and Nalidixic Acid (CNA)
For the Reference Culture Method, turbid LIM broth cultures were subcultured to CNA plates, and all suspicious colonies were screened to confirm or rule-out the presence of GBS using established laboratory methods: gram stain, catalase, PYR testing, and latex agglutination. If LIM broth or CNA plates were negative after 24 hrs incubation, cultures were re-incubated an additional 24 hrs before calling samples negative by the Reference Culture Method.
After enrichment, an aliquot of culture was taken for inoculation onto chromID Strepto B agar. Plates were incubated at 35°C-37°C for 24 hrs under aerobic conditions with minimal light exposure. Pale pink to red colonies detected on chromID Strepto B agar plates after 24 hrs of incubation were suggestive of GBS. All colonies growing on chromID Strepto B medium were evaluated for the study and characterized using one or more of the following laboratory tests: gram stain, catalase, PYR testing, and latex agglutination. VITEK MS was used to identify all organisms growing on chromID Strepto B agar plates and GBS colonies by the Reference Method. Performance (sensitivity and specificity) of chromID Strepto B medium compared to the Reference Culture Method is presented in Table 6 below.
Table 6. Comparison between chromID Strepto B medium and Reference Culture Method
| | Reference Culture Method | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| chromID Strepto B (24 hr result) | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positivea | 172 | 40c | 212 |
| Negativeb | 4d | 465 | 469 |
| Total | 176 | 505 | 681 |
| | Sensitivity: 97.7%, 95%CI: 94.3%-99.1% Specificity: 92.1%, 95%CI: 89.4%-94.1% | | |
aPositive—pale pink to red colonies on chromID Strepto B agar
bNegative—colorless colonies or colony colors other than pale pink to red on chromID Strepto B agar
40 discordant samples (FP) were observed. Of these 40 chromID Strep B pale pink to red colonies, four were confirmed as GBS by biochemical testing and VITEK MS identification. Thirty six samples grew pale pink to red colonies on chromID Strepto B plates that were not GBS. An additional eight FP samples were observed after 48 hrs of incubation on chromID Strepto B plates.
4 discordant samples (FN) were observed. 3 of 4 samples that did not grow pale pink to red colonies after 24 hrs of incubation on chromID Strepto B plates grew colonies indicative of GBS at 48 hrs.
{9}
b. Clinical specificity:
See above
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not Applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not Applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The overall prevalence of GBS by the Reference Culture Method was 25.8% (176/681).
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
10
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.