K163003 · Pega Medical, Inc. · HRS · Mar 16, 2017 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K163003
Device Name
Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System
Applicant
Pega Medical, Inc.
Product Code
HRS · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Mar 16, 2017
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3030
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System is intended for the temporary internal fixation of fractures and osteotomies of the greater trochanter or of the proximal femur. It is indicated for the following: - Re-attachment of the greater trochanter following osteotomy in THA - Trochanteric and intertrochanteric fractures - Extended trochanteric osteotomy - Periprosthetic femoral fractures - Comminuted fractures - Mal-unions and non-unions - Fractures in osteopenic bone
Device Story
Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System is a metallic bone fixation implant for proximal femoral fractures and osteotomies. Device features a Y-shaped design with anterior and posterolateral branches to stabilize the greater trochanter against rotation and translation while minimizing implant prominence. Fixation is achieved via locking/non-locking screws and cerclage cables. Available in four lengths (135-285 mm) with left/right anatomical versions. Used by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings to provide temporary internal fixation, promoting bone healing and stability in patients with femoral fractures or post-osteotomy recovery.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical testing provided. Evidence consists of bench testing (static and fatigue) comparing Y3 to NCB system, and a systematic literature review. Bench results show Y3 is 1.96x stiffer and has 1.77x higher yield point than the predicate. Literature review (Cloutier et al., 2014) using cadaveric models demonstrated the antero-lateral locking plate significantly reduced greater trochanter anterior migration (-0.9 mm ± 1.6) compared to lateral locking plates (9.6 mm ± 9.5).
Technological Characteristics
Material: Titanium Alloy Ti-6Al-4V ELI (ASTM F136). Design: Y-shaped plate with anterior and posterolateral branches. Fixation: Locking/non-locking screws (3.5mm/4.5mm) and cerclage cables. Dimensions: 135, 185, 235, 285 mm lengths; left/right anatomical versions. Mechanical principle: Internal bone fixation via rigid plate and screw construct.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring temporary internal fixation of greater trochanter or proximal femur fractures/osteotomies, including THA-related re-attachment, trochanteric/intertrochanteric fractures, extended trochanteric osteotomy, periprosthetic fractures, comminuted fractures, mal-unions, non-unions, and osteopenic bone fractures.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories are devices intended to be implanted consisting of one or more metallic components and their metallic fasteners. The devices contain a plate, a nail/plate combination, or a blade/plate combination that are made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, stainless steel, and titanium, that are intended to be held in position with fasteners, such as screws and nails, or bolts, nuts, and washers. These devices are used for fixation of fractures of the proximal or distal end of long bones, such as intracapsular, intertrochanteric, intercervical, supracondylar, or condylar fractures of the femur; for fusion of a joint; or for surgical procedures that involve cutting a bone. The devices may be implanted or attached through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.
Predicate Devices
NCB Periprosthetic Trochanter Plates and Screws, NCB Cable Button for NCB Polyaxial Locking Plate in combination with the NCB Periprosthetic Femur Polyaxial Locking Plate System (K120772)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) of the United States. The seal features the department's name encircling a symbol of three stylized human profiles facing right. The profiles are stacked on top of each other, creating a sense of depth and unity. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the symbol.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
March 16, 2017
Pega Medical Inc. Ariel Dujovne President 1111 Autoroute Chomedey Laval, Ouebec, CA H7W 5J8
Re: K163003
Trade/Device Name: Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3030 Regulation Name: Single/Multiple Component Metallic Bone Fixation Appliances And Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HRS, HWC Dated: February 7, 2017 Received: February 9, 2017
Dear Ariel Dujovne:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely,
# Lori A. Wiggins -S
for Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K163003
Device Name Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Y 3 Proximal Femoral Plate System is intended for the temporary internal fixation of fractures and osteotomies of the greater trochanter or of the proximal femur.
It is indicated for the following:
- · Re-attachment of the greater trochanter following osteotomy in THA
- · Trochanteric and intertrochanteric fractures
- · Extended trochanteric osteotomy
- · Periprosthetic femoral fractures
- · Comminuted fractures
- · Mal-unions and non-unions
- · Fractures in osteopenic bone
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW .*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
## Applicant :
Contact Person : Proprietary Name : Common Name : Device Classification : Classification Name :
#### Device Product Code : Establishment Registration Number :
Pega Medical Inc. 1111 Highway Chomedey Laval, Quebec, Canada, H7W 5J8 Phone : 1-877-739-5175 Fax : 1-888-258-0760 Ariel R. Dujovne Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System Fracture fixation Plate Class II Single/Multiple Component Metallic Bone Fixation Appliances And Accessories (21 CFR 888.3030) HRS, HWC 9048931
#### Intended Use:
The Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System is intended for the temporary internal fixation of fractures and osteotomies of the greater trochanter or of the proximal femur. It is indicated for the following:
- Re-attachment of the greater trochanter following osteotomy in THA
- Trochanteric and intertrochanteric fractures
- Extended trochanteric osteotomy ●
- o Periprosthetic femoral fractures
- Comminuted fractures ●
- Mal-unions and non-unions
- Fractures in osteopenic bone ●
## Description:
The Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System is an innovative fixation device intended for the treatment of proximal femoral fractures and osteotomies. The unique Y-shape design divides the proximal portion of the plate into anterior and posterolateral branches, thus intended for stability at the Greater Trochanter level both in rotation and translation while reducing the prominence of the implant. Fixation options include locking and non-locking screws in addition to cerclage cables. The Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System is manufactured in medical grade Titanium Alloy Ti-6AI-4V ELI as per ASTM F136. The Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System is available in four lengths: 135, 185, 235 and 285 mm. Left and right versions are offered to accommodate the anatomical shape of the proximal femur.
{4}------------------------------------------------
### Basis for substantial equivalence:
The Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System is claimed to be substantially equivalent in design, indicated use and function to the following predicate devices:
| | Primary<br>Predicate Device | Additional Predicate<br>Device | Reference Device |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Device Name | NCB Periprosthetic Trochanter Plates and<br>Screws, NCB Cable Button for NCB Polyaxial<br>Locking Plate<br>in combination with the<br>NCB Periprosthetic Femur Polyaxial Locking<br>Plate System | Cable-Ready<br>Cable Grip<br>System | Gap Endo-Exo<br>Medullary System |
| Marketed by | Zimmer, GmbH | Zimmer, Inc. | Pega Medical Inc. |
| FDA 510(k)<br>number | K120772 | K151907 | K160545 |
## Summary of Technologies:
The technological characteristics of the Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System are the same or similar to the ones of the predicate devices. Both the Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System and the NCB Periprosthetic Trochanter System use screws a primary fixation system. Both use 3.5mm screws for trochanteric fixations. For diaphyseal fixation, the Y3 Plate offers 4.5mm screws, while the NCB System proposes 4.0mm and 5.0mm screws. The Y3 Plate is made of Titanium TiAl6V4 ELI Alloy and the NCB System is made of Titanium TiAl6V4 Alloy.
## Non-clinical Performance Data:
Verification calculations were completed to evaluate resistance of the Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System in comparison to the Cable-Ready Cable Grip System and NCB Periprosthetic Trochanter System. The mechanical properties of all the screw components of the system were analysed in comparison to the predicate systems. Furthermore, stresses on the plate during were evaluated to ensure proper resistance of the system. Finally, the bench testing of the Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System in static and fatique confirmed the validity of these calculations. Results of the static and fatique bench testing on the Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System and NCB system have demonstrated that the Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System performed equivalently to the predicate NCB system.
Finally, a systematic search of the scientific literature was carried out and a Clinical Evidence Review report was issued. This report intentify and analyze the published peer-reviewed scientific literature regarding trochanteric fixation in general, and more specifically of the two predicate systems, in order to establish substantial equivalence of the Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System by addressing the clinical hazards identified in the device Risk Analysis.
{5}------------------------------------------------
As per the findings of the bench testing and the scientific literature review, the data supports the substantial equivalence of the subject device.
The Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System is substantially equivalent in bending compared to the NCB Periprosthetic Trochanter System. The stiffness and the Yield point of the Y3 Plate (slope) are respectively 49,5 N/mm and 536.6N compared to 25.3 N/mm and 303.4N for the predicate. Consequently, the Y3 Plate is 1.96 times stiffer and the yield is 1.77 times higher than the predicate. The compression bending strength at vield of the Y3 Plate is 34.6 Nm, which is 1.6 higher than the 21.3Nm of the predicate.
The Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System plate reduces greater trochanter anterior migration in cadaveric models. During a biomechanical hip extension study, multi-directional greater trochanter fragment movements occurred and showed a back-and-forth anterior rotation. The lateral locking plate failed due to greater trochanter fragment rotation around the superior axis and anterior translation. The antero-lateral locking plate significantly reduced greater trochanter anterior migration (-0.9 mm ± 1.6) compared to the lateral locking plate (9.6 mm ± 9.5). [Cloutier, L. P., Laflamme, G. Y., Menard, J., & Petit, Y. (2014). Anterior locking plate reduces trochanteric fracture migrations during hip extension. Clinical Biomechanics, 29(8), 930-935.]
#### Clinical Performance Data:
No clinical testing is provided as a basis for substantial equivalence.
#### Conclusion:
Based on the similarities in the intended use, design, materials, manufacturing methods, and packaging, the Y3 Proximal Femoral Plate System has been established as substantially equivalent to the previously cleared predicate devices. Furthermore, mechanical evaluation results demonstrate that the proposed system is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.