Method Comparison Study; Method comparison using linear regression
Patients with TSH values ranging from 0.02 - 91.78 uIU/mL; Sample Size: 337
ADVIA CENTAUR TSH assay
Correlation of MAGLUMI TSH assay to predicate device
Reference Range Study; Observational study following CLSI C28-A3
Apparently healthy adults (22 years and older); Sample Size: 126
Not applicable for this study
Establishment of normal reference range
Indications for Use
The MAGLUMI 2000 TSH assay is for in vitro diagnostic use in the quantitative determination of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) in human serum. The measurement of TSH is used in the diagnosis of thyroid disorders. The MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay system is an automated immunoassay analyzer designed to perform in vitro diagnostic tests in clinical serum specimens. The MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay system’s assay application utilizes chemiluminescents technology for clinical use.
Device Story
MAGLUMI 2000 is a floor-model, fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay analyzer. It processes human serum samples using pre-packaged reagent kits containing magnetic microbeads coated with anti-TSH monoclonal antibodies and ABEI-labeled anti-TSH antibodies. The system performs a sandwich immunoassay: sample, magnetic particles, and labeled antibodies are mixed and incubated at 37°C; magnetic separation removes unbound components; starters initiate a chemiluminescent reaction. A photomultiplier tube (PMT) measures light signal (RLUs) to quantify TSH concentration. Operated by laboratory personnel in clinical settings, the system provides quantitative results to assist physicians in diagnosing thyroid disorders. The device integrates custom and off-the-shelf software for scheduling, pipetting, and data analysis.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance validated per CLSI guidelines (EP5-A2, EP6-A, EP17-A2, EP7-A2, EP9-A2). Precision studies (N=240 per level) showed total CVs between 2.45% and 5.95%. Linearity confirmed between 0.02 and 91.78 µIU/mL (R2=0.9990). Method comparison against predicate (n=337) yielded Y=1.0178X-0.0773 (R2=0.9974). No interference observed for common substances (bilirubin, hemoglobin, triglycerides, biotin, etc.) or cross-reactivity with FSH, LH, or hCG.
Technological Characteristics
Floor-model automated analyzer; chemiluminescent detection via PMT in photon counting mode. Reagents include magnetic microbeads, ABEI-labeled monoclonal antibodies, and tris/phosphate buffers. Connectivity: automated, random access/batch processing. Software-controlled. Traceable to WHO IRP 81/565. Complies with CLSI standards for precision, linearity, and interference.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative determination of TSH in human serum to aid in the diagnosis of thyroid disorders in adults.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A thyroid stimulating hormone test system is a device intended to measure thyroid stimulating hormone, also known as thyrotrophin and thyrotrophic hormone, in serum and plasma. Measurements of thyroid stimulating hormone produced by the anterior pituitary are used in the diagnosis of thyroid or pituitary disorders.
Siemens Trinidad Immunoassay (IM) System (K151792)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k162698
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH)
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative chemiluminescent immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Shenzhen New Industries Biomedical Engineering Co., Ltd.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
MAGLUMI 2000 TSH
MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay Analyzer
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product code | Classification | Regulation section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JLW | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1690, Thyroid stimulating hormone test system | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
| JJE | Class I | 21 CFR 862.2160, Discrete photometric chemistry analyzer for clinical use | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indication(s) for use below.
{1}
2. Indication(s) for use:
The MAGLUMI 2000 TSH assay is for in vitro diagnostic use in the quantitative determination of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) in human serum. The measurement of TSH is used in the diagnosis of thyroid disorders.
The MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay system is an automated immunoassay analyzer designed to perform in vitro diagnostic tests in clinical serum specimens. The MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay system’s assay application utilizes chemiluminescents technology for clinical use.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay Analyzer
I. Device Description:
The MAGLUMI 2000 TSH kit is available as a 50 test or 100 test kit and consists of the following reagents:
- Magnetic Microbeads coated with anti-TSH monoclonal antibody, phosphate buffer, NaN₃ (<0.1%) and ProClin 300.
- Calibrator Low contains TSH antigen (human origin), phosphate buffer bovine serum NaN₃ (<0.1%) and ProClin 300. Target Value of 0.129 μIU/mL.
- Calibrator High contains TSH antigen (human origin), phosphate buffer, bovine serum NaN₃ (<0.1%) and ProClin 300. Target value of 38.67 μIU/mL.
- Buffer with Tris buffer, HAMA Blocker, BSA, NaN₃ (<0.1%) and ProClin 300.
- ABEI labeled with anti-TSH monoclonal antibody (mouse) Tris buffer, containing BSA, NaN₃ (<0.1%) and ProClin 300.
- Control 1 - contains TSH antigen (human origin), phosphate buffer, bovine serum NaN₃ (<0.1%) and ProClin 300. Target value of 0.6 μIU/mL.
- Control 2 - contains TSH antigen (human origin), phosphate buffer, bovine serum NaN₃ (<0.1%) and ProClin 300. Target value of 6.0 μIU/mL.
- Control 3 - contains TSH antigen (human origin), phosphate buffer, bovine serum NaN₃ (<0.1%) and ProClin 300. Target value of 18 μIU/mL.
2
{2}
All human sources materials were tests by FDA approved methods and found to be negative for HIV-1, HIV-2, and HBsAg.
The MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay Analyzer, is a fully-auto chemiluminescence analyzer used for determination of analytes in serum. The MAGLUMI 2000 system is a floor model, fully automated instrument system that utilizes pre-packaged reagent packs to measure a variety of analytes in human body fluids. It is controlled through a combination of custom and off-the-shelf software.
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
ADVIA Centaur TSH3-Ultra, Trinidad Immunoassay (IM) System
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k083844, k151792
3. Comparison with predicate:
MAGLUMI 2000 TSH assay:
| Similarities /Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device
MAGLUMI 2000 TSH
k162698 | Predicate Device
ADVIA Centaur TSH3-Ultra
k083844 |
| Intended Use | For the quantitative determination of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) in human serum | Same |
| Measured Analyte | Thyroid-stimulating hormone | Same |
| Measurement | Quantitative | Same |
| Test principle | Sandwich chemiluminescent immunoassay | Same |
| Detection Antibody | anti-TSH monoclonal antibody labeled with N-(amino butyl)-N-(ethylisoluminol) (ABEI) | Monoclonal murine anti-TSH antibody BSA conjugate labeled with acridinium ester |
| Capture Antibody | Anti-TSH monoclonal antibody bound to magnetic microbeads | Anti-fluorescein labeled monoclonal murine anti-TSH antibody covalently bound to paramagnetic particles |
| Specimen | Serum | Serum, heparinized plasma, EDTA plasma |
| Measuring range | 0.02 μIU/mL - 91.78 μIU/mL | 0.008 μIU/mL - 150 μIU/mL |
| Sample size | 100 μL | Same |
| Calibration | 2 Point | Same |
{3}
MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay Analyzer:
| Similarities/Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device
MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay Analyzer
k162698 | Predicate Device
Trinidad Immunoassay (IM)
System
k151792 |
| Intended Use | Automated, immunoassay analyzer designed to perform in vitro diagnostic tests on clinical specimens | Same |
| Principles of Assay Operation | Chemiluminescence using magnetic-particle solid phase and chemiluminescent label | Same |
| Type of System | Random access, Batch, STAT | Random access and Batch |
| Throughput Rate | Up to 180 tests/hr. | 120 to 240 tests/hr. |
| Optical System | PMT used in photon counting mode | Same |
| Dispense System | Automated pipetting of samples using precision syringe | Same |
| Sample Type | Serum | Serum, plasma, urine, whole blood hemolysate, amniotic fluid |
| Sample Volume | 5 to 200 μL | 10 to 200 μL |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- CLSI EP05-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Devices; Approved Guideline-Second Edition.
- CLSI EP06-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline.
- CLSI EP17-A2: Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline-Second Edition.
- CLSI EP07-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline-Second Edition.
- CLSI EP09-A2: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline-Second Edition.
{4}
# L. Test Principle:
The MAGLUMI 2000 TSH assay is a sandwich chemiluminescence immunoassay. Testing is performed by combining the sample with magnetic particles coated with anti-TSH monoclonal antibody, buffer and N-(4-Amino-Butyl)-N-Ethyl-Isoluminol (ABEI) labeled with another monoclonal antibody to TSH, mixing thoroughly, and incubating at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ , to form a sandwich of immuno-complexes. After precipitation in a magnetic field, the supernatant is decanted and then a wash cycle is performed. Subsequently, the starters are added to the precipitate to initiate a chemiluminescent reaction. The light signal is measured by a photomultiplier within 3 seconds as relative light units (RLUs), which is indicative of TSH concentration present in samples, calibrators or controls.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The precision study was performed in accordance with CLSI EP05-A2 guideline. The following sample types were tested: four controls, two calibrators, five spiked patient serum pool samples and four native patient serum pools. Testing was performed using 3 analyzers and 3 different reagent lots, over 20 days in duplicate with 2 runs per day for a total of 80 data points per sample on each analyzer. The combined results for each sample are summarized in the table below:
| Sample | Mean μIU/mL (N=240) | Within-Run | | Between -Run | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Control 1 | 0.221 | 0.010 | 4.73 | 0.005 | 2.40 | 0.013 | 5.95 |
| Control 2 | 0.620 | 0.27 | 1.38 | 0.013 | 2.04 | 0.032 | 5.12 |
| Control 3 | 6.546 | 0.277 | 4.23 | 0.233 | 3.57 | 0.368 | 5.62 |
| Control 4 | 17.961 | 0.711 | 3.96 | 0.354 | 1.97 | 0.843 | 4.70 |
| Calibrator low | 0.330 | 0.015 | 4.50 | 0.014 | 4.38 | 0.019 | 5.86 |
| Calibrator high | 38.037 | 1.372 | 3.61 | 0.363 | 0.96 | 1.478 | 3.89 |
| Serum pool 1 | 1.257 | 0.05 | 3.95 | 0.035 | 2.82 | 0.067 | 5.37 |
| Serum pool 2 | 6.401 | 0.102 | 1.60 | 0.164 | 2.56 | 0.157 | 2.44 |
| Serum pool 3 | 11.880 | 0.472 | 3.97 | 0.42 | 3.56 | 0.66 | 5.54 |
| Serum pool 4 | 38.67 | 1.221 | 3.24 | 0.788 | 2.09 | 1.533 | 4.07 |
| Serum pool 5 | 64.309 | 2.371 | 3.69 | 2.022 | 3.14 | 3.109 | 4.83 |
| Native pool 1 | 0.5777 | 0.025 | 4.33 | 0.012 | 2.08 | 0.029 | 5.02 |
| Native pool 2 | 1.137 | 0.048 | 4.222 | 0.032 | 2.81 | 0.067 | 5.89 |
| Native pool 3 | 5.026 | 0.201 | 3.992 | 0.098 | 1.95 | 0.247 | 4.91 |
| Native pool 4 | 9.750 | 0.429 | 4.401 | 0.139 | 1.42 | 0.460 | 4.72 |
{5}
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The linearity for MAGLUMI 20000 TSH was evaluated in a study that followed the CLSI EP6-A guideline. Eleven equally distributed levels samples were prepared by mixing a low TSH serum sample (concentration $0\mu \mathrm{IU} / \mathrm{mL}$ ) and a high TSH serum sample (concentration $105\mu \mathrm{IU} / \mathrm{mL}$ ). All samples were run in quadruplicate on 3 MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay Analyzers, with 3 reagent lots. The mean observed value was compared to the expected values, the results obtained are shown in the following table:
| Sample | Observed (μIU/mL) | Expected (μIU/mL) | % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 | 0.4896 | 0.5 | 97.8 |
| 2 | 4.983 | 5.0 | 99.6 |
| 3 | 10.691 | 10.5 | 101.8 |
| 4 | 21.652 | 21.0 | 103.1 |
| 5 | 30.785 | 30.5 | 100.9 |
| 6 | 42.555 | 42.0 | 101.3 |
| 7 | 52.278 | 52.5 | 99.6 |
| 8 | 62.105 | 63.0 | 98.6 |
| 9 | 75.052 | 73.5 | 102.1 |
| 10 | 83.218 | 84.0 | 99.1 |
| 11 | 94.807 | 94.5 | 100.3 |
The expected values were plotted against the observed values and the following regression equation was obtained:
$$
y = 1. 0 0 0 1 x + 0. 0 4 7 4, R ^ {2} = 0. 9 9 9 0
$$
The results of the linearity study support the claimed measuring range of $0.02\mu \mathrm{IU} / \mathrm{mL}$ to $91.78~\mu \mathrm{IU} / \mathrm{mL}$ .
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability:
MAGLUMI TSH calibrators are traceable to the TSH WHO $3^{\mathrm{rd}}$ International Standard 81/565.
Stability:
Real-time shelf-life stability testing of the TSH reagent kit (which includes controls and calibrators) is ongoing. The accelerated studies protocols and acceptances criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable to support a shelf-life of 12 months at $2-8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ .
{6}
Protocols and acceptance criteria for on-board/open vial stability studies for the kit, which includes controls and calibrators, were reviewed and found to be acceptable to support an on-board stability of 28 days at $10^{\circ}\mathrm{C} \pm 3^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$.
## d. Detection limit:
The limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD) and the limit of quantitation (LoQ) of the MAGLUMI 2000 TSH kit were evaluated in accordance with CLSI EP17-A2 guideline.
## Limit of Blank (LoB)
To calculate the LoB for the MAGLUMI TSH, $5\%$ BSA diluent was tested in triplicates for 10 consecutive days, 2 runs per day on three different lot reagents to yield 60 data points on the MAGLUMI 2000 Instrument assay. LoB was calculated using the mean of the $57^{\text{th}}$ and $58^{\text{th}}$ highest obtained values and was determined to be $0.001 \mu \mathrm{IU} / \mathrm{mL}$.
## Limit of Detection (LoD)
Four low human serum samples pools with TSH concentrations of 0.005, 0.01, 0.02 and $0.03\mu \mathrm{IU} / \mathrm{mL}$ were tested on the MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay Analyzer, in duplicates for 10 consecutive days, 2 runs per day on 3 different reagent lots for a total of 60 data sets. LoD was calculated according to the EP17-A2 guideline and determined to be $0.006\mu \mathrm{IU} / \mathrm{mL}$.
## Limit of Quantitation (LoQ)
Six serum sample pools with TSH concentrations of 0.16, 0.07, 0.03, 0.0017, 0.009 and $0.005\mu \mathrm{IU} / \mathrm{mL}$, were used to determine the LoQ. Each level was tested in duplicates for 20 days 2 runs per day using 3 different reagent lots for a total of 60 data points. The sponsor defined LoQ as the lowest concentration that demonstrated an imprecision of $20\%$, which was determined to be $0.01\mu \mathrm{IU} / \mathrm{mL}$.
| LoB | LoD | LoQ |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 0.001 μIU/mL | 0.006 μIU/mL | 0.01 μIU/mL |
The LoB, LoD and LoQ studies support the MAGLUMI TSH assay claimed measuring range of 0.02 to $91.78\mu \mathrm{IU} / \mathrm{mL}$.
## e. Analytical specificity:
Interference by endogenous and exogenous substances was evaluated in serum samples according to the CLSI EP07-A2 guideline. Two serum samples with TSH concentration of approximately $0.7\mu \mathrm{IU} / \mathrm{mL}$ and $6.1\mu \mathrm{IU} / \mathrm{mL}$ were spiked with interfering substances and tested in triplicate with 3 reagent lots on one MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay Analyzer. Interference was determined by testing controls (no interfering substance added) and matched test sample (with interfering substance added).
{7}
The sponsor defines significant interference as $\pm 10\%$ bias as compared to the control results. The results of the interference study are summarized in the table below:
| Substances | Maximum concentration tested that demonstrated no significant interference |
| --- | --- |
| Hemoglobin | 2000 mg/dL |
| Conjugated bilirubin | 60 mg/dL |
| Unconjugated bilirubin | 40 mg/dL |
| Rheumatic factor | 124 IU/mL |
| Acetaminophen | 20 mg/dL |
| Ibuprofen | 50 mg/dL |
| Aspirin | 50 mg/dL |
| Biotin | 10 ng/mL |
| Total protein | 12.5 mg/mL |
| Triglycerides | 1000mg/dL |
# Cross-Reactivity Testing:
A cross-reactivity study was performed to evaluate the potential cross-reactivity of the TSH assay. The potential cross-reactants were added at defined concentrations to human serum samples with TSH concentrations of 1.09, 2.1, $5.0~\mu \mathrm{IU / mL}$ . The control and spiked samples were assayed in triplicates using 3 reagent lots on the MAGLUMI 2000 System. The sponsor defines non-significant interference as $\leq 5\%$ difference from the of the expected value. The following potentially cross-reacting compounds, at the following concentrations, did not interfere with the performance of the device:
| Compound Tested | Highest Concentration | Cross-reactivity (%) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| FSH | 1,500 mIU/mL | ≤ 0.53 |
| LH | 600 mIU/mL | ≤ 1.39 |
| hCG | 200 IU/mL | ≤ 1.59 |
# Human Anti-Mouse Antibodies (HAMA):
The effects of human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) on the MAGLUMI TSH assay were evaluated. Individual patient serum samples with TSH concentrations of 0.133, 2.56, and $4.71\mu \mathrm{IU} / \mathrm{mL}$ were mixed with equal volume of HAMA positive samples. The final concentration of HAMA in these samples was $300~\mathrm{ng / mL}$ . The mixed samples were analyzed using the MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay Analyzer in triplicate. The results indicate no interference from HAMA up to $300~\mathrm{ng / mL}$ . The following cautionary note has been included in the Limitations of the Procedure section of the product insert: "Patient sample containing human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) may give falsely elevated or decreased values. Although HAMA neutralizing agents are added, extremely high HAMA serum concentrations may occasionally influence results".
{8}
High Dose Hook Effect:
To evaluate the potential for high dose hook effect on the MAGLUMI TSH assay, six serum samples were spiked with TSH WHO standard to generate concentrations values of 100, 300, 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 µIU/mL. For each of the six samples, four serial dilutions were created with TSH WHO standard in ratios of 1:10, 1:32, 1:64, and 1:128. Testing was performed for each stock solution and each diluted solution in duplicate using three different reagent lots. The results demonstrate that no hook effect was observed at TSH concentration ≤ 3000 µIU/ml.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not Applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
A method comparison study was performed according to the CLSI EP09-A2 guideline. A total of 337 native patient serum samples with TSH values ranging from 0.02 – 91.78 µIU/mL were tested with three lots of MAGLUMI TSH assay on three MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay system at three sites. Samples were tested in singlicate on both the MAGLUMI 2000 TSH assay (candidate) and the ADVIA Centaur TSH3-Ultra assay (predicate). The results yielded the following linear regression equation:
$$
y = 1.0178x - 0.0773, R^2 = 0.9974
$$
b. Matrix comparison:
Not Applicable. Only serum samples are recommended for use with this assay.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not Applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not Applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not Applicable.
{9}
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not Applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The reference range was determined using the procedure in the CLSI C28-A3 guideline. A total of serum 126 samples from healthy individuals 22 years and older (64 females and 62 males) were tested using three lots of MAGLUMI 2000 TSH reagents on one MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay system. The expected normal range of TSH as measured by the MAGLUMI TSH assay is $0.658 - 4.864\ \mu\mathrm{IU/mL}$ based on the central $95\%$ interval of the results from this study ($2.5^{\text{th}} - 97.5^{\text{th}}$ percentile results).
N. Instrument Name:
MAGLUMI 2000 Immunoassay Analyzer
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device?
☑ Yes ☐ X or No
Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?
☐ Yes ☐ X or No
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
☑ Yes ☐ X or No
3. Specimen Identification:
A barcode scanner is part of the instrument system and is used to identify specimens.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
The instrument system has automated specimen sampling and handling.
10
{10}
5. Calibration:
The results are generated using a calibration curve which is instrument specific, generated by 2-point calibration and a master curve provided via the reagent Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) CHIP. Recalibration is needed under the following conditions:
- Exchange of reagent lot.
- Every week and/or each time a new reagent is used.
- After any major service is performed.
- If the controls are out of the expected range.
- When the room temperature changes exceeds 5°C.
6. Quality Control:
The sponsor recommends the user should follow government regulations or accreditation for quality control frequency. (Three levels of quality control are provided in the kit.)
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
A carryover study was performed using a free TSH serum sample (blank), a mid-level pool and a serum pool with a TSH concentration of 90 µIU/mL (high). Testing was performed for five days, according to the following order: Mid, High, Low, Mid, Mid, Low, Low, High, High, Mid. Each sample was analyzed using three instruments and three lots of reagent. Percent carryover was calculated each day and compared to zero. The data obtained in all 5 days showed that the percent carryover is less than 0.01%. The sponsor concluded that the percent carryover is not detectably different from zero.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
11
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.