K162302 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · JAK · Dec 16, 2016 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K162302
Device Name
Somatom Confidence ® RT Pro
Applicant
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
Product Code
JAK · Radiology
Decision Date
Dec 16, 2016
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.1750
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K162302 · Dec 16, 2016
Somatom Confidence ® RT Pro
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) clinical study data
The sponsor cites the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) to support the clinical validity and indications for use for low-dose lung cancer screening in high-risk populations.
Lung cancer screening; NLST; Clinical literature
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
National Lung Screening Trial (NLST); Randomized controlled trial; Study Period: August 2002 - October 2010
High-risk populations for lung cancer
Chest radiography
Reduction in lung cancer mortality
Indications for Use
This computed tomography system is intended to generate and process cross-sectional images of patients by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data. The images delivered by a trained physician as an aid in diagnosis. The images delivered by the system can be used by trained staff as an aid in diagnosis, treatment preparation and radiation therapy planning. This CT system can be used for low dose lung cancer screening in high risk populations.
Device Story
SOMATOM Confidence RT Pro is a whole-body CT scanner using a continuously rotating tube-detector system based on the fan beam principle. It acquires x-ray transmission data, which the system reconstructs into cross-sectional DICOM images. Operated by trained staff in clinical settings, the device supports diagnosis, treatment preparation, and radiation therapy planning (e.g., brachytherapy, proton therapy, surgery). It features a touch panel interface, new gantry/table covers, and a 2 cm Stellar RT detector. The system includes DirectDensity™ reconstruction, providing images with HU-like scaling proportional to relative electron density. Output images are reviewed by physicians to aid clinical decision-making and therapy planning. The device supports low-dose lung cancer screening protocols. Cybersecurity features are integrated to protect data integrity and access.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical trials were conducted for this device. Evidence relies on non-clinical bench testing, including integration, functional, and phantom tests. Performance of the DirectDensity™ feature was validated using the Gammex 467 Tissue Characterization Phantom and simulations. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) is cited as supportive literature for the lung cancer screening indication. The device conforms to standards including ISO 14791, NEMA XR-29, IEC 61223-2-6, IEC 61223-3-5, IEC 62304, NEMA XR-25, DICOM 3.1-3.20, IEC 60601-1, 60601-2-44, and 60601-1-2.
Technological Characteristics
Whole-body CT scanner; fan beam principle; Straton MX P X-ray tube; 20/64 slice configurations; 2 cm Stellar RT detector. Materials: standard medical-grade gantry/table covers. Energy: X-ray. Connectivity: DICOM 3.1-3.20, Teamplay data exchange. Software: syngo CT VA62A (SOMARIS/7 VA62A), Windows-based. Features: DirectDensity™ reconstruction (HU-like scaling proportional to relative electron density), iterative reconstruction, touch panel interface. Standards: ISO 14791, NEMA XR-29, IEC 61223-2-6, IEC 61223-3-5, IEC 62304, NEMA XR-25, IEC 60601-1, 60601-2-44, 60601-1-2.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring cross-sectional imaging via CT reconstruction for diagnosis, treatment preparation, and radiation therapy planning. Also indicated for low-dose lung cancer screening in high-risk populations as defined by professional medical societies.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A computed tomography x-ray system is a diagnostic x-ray system intended to produce cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data from the same axial plane taken at different angles. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other, with flowing lines beneath them.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
December 16, 2016
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. % Ms. Kimberly Mangum Regulatory Affairs Specialist 40 Liberty Blvd., Mail Code 65-1A MALVERN PA 19355
Re: K162302
Trade/Device Name: SOMATOM Confidence ® RT Pro Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1750 Regulation Name: Computed tomography x-ray system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: JAK Dated: November 10, 2016 Received: November 14, 2016
Dear Ms. Mangum:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21. Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{1}------------------------------------------------
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638 2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
Michael D'Hara
For
Robert Ochs, Ph.D. Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K162302
Device Name
SOMATOM Confidence ® RT Pro
Indications for Use (Describe)
This computed tomography system is intended to generate and process cross-sectional images of patients by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data. The images delivered by a trained physician as an aid in diagnosis.
The images delivered by the system can be used by trained staff as an aid in diagnosis, treatment preparation and radiation therapy planning.
This CT system can be used for low dose lung cancer screening in high risk populations *
* As defined by professional medical societies. Please refer to clinical literature, including the results of the National Lung Screening Trial (N Engl J Med 2011; 365:395-409) and subsequent literature, for further information.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(K) SUMMARY FOR
### SOMATOM Confidence
Submitted by: Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. 40 Liberty Boulevard Malvern, PA 19355 Date Prepared: November 9, 2016
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR §807.92.
### I. Submitter
Importer/Distributor Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. 40 Liberty Boulevard Malvern, PA 19355
Establishment Registration Number 2240869
### Location of Manufacturing Site
Siemens Healthcare GmbH Siemensstr. 1 D-91301 Forchheim, Germany
# Establishment Registration Number
3004977335
#### Contact Person:
Kimberly Mangum Requlatory Affairs Specialist Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. 40 Liberty Boulevard Malvern, PA 19355 Phone: (610) 448-6477 Fax: (610) 640-4481 Email: kimberly.mangum@siemens.com
### II. Device Name and Classification
Product Name: SOMATOM Confidence Propriety Trade Name: SOMATOM Confidence® RT Pro Classification Name: Computed Tomography X-Ray System Classification Panel: Radiology CFR Section: 21 CFR §892.1750 Device Class: Class II Product Code: JAK
#### III. Predicate Device Primary Predicate Device:
SOMATOM Definition AS Open Trade Name: 510(k) Number: K142955
{4}------------------------------------------------
| Clearance Date: | November 24, 2015 |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Classification Name: | Computed Tomography X-ray System |
| Classification Panel: | Radiology |
| CFR Section: | 21 CFR §892.1750 |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | JAK |
| Recall Information: | Information about design related recalls are provided in Section<br>18. |
#### Secondary Predicate Device:
| Trade Name: | SOMATOM Definition Flash |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) Number: | K142955 |
| Clearance Date: | November 24, 2015 |
| Classification Name: | Computed Tomography X-ray System |
| Classification Panel: | Radiology |
| CFR Section: | 21 CFR § 892.1750 |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | JAK |
| Recall Information: | Information about design related recalls are provided in Section 18. |
#### Reference Devices:
| Trade Name:<br>510(k) Number:<br>Clearance Date:<br>Classification Name:<br>Classification Panel:<br>CFR Section:<br>Device Class:<br>Product Code:<br>Recall Information: | SOMATOM Definition AS Open<br>K130901<br>January 2, 2014<br>Computed Tomography X-ray System<br>Radiology<br>21 CFR § 892.1750<br>Class II<br>JAK<br>Information about design related recalls are provided in Section<br>18. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name: | SOMATOM Definition Flash |
| 510(k) Number: | K121072 |
| Clearance Date: | May 08, 2012 |
| Classification Name: | Computed Tomography X-ray System |
| Clearance Date: | May 08, 2012 |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Classification Name: | Computed Tomography X-ray System |
| Classification Panel: | Radiology |
| CFR Section: | 21 CFR § 892.1750 |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | JAK |
| Recall Information: | Information about design related recalls are provided in Section 18. |
### IV. Device Description
The Siemens SOMATOM Confidence is a Computed Tomography X- ray System which features one continuously rotating tube-detector system and functions according to the fan beam principle. The SOMATOM Confidence produces CT images in DICOM format, which can be used by trained staff for post-processing applications commercially distributed by Siemens and other vendors as an aid in diagnosis, treatment preparation and therapy planning support (including, but not limited to, Brachytherapy, Particle including Proton Therapy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, Surgery). The computer
{5}------------------------------------------------
system delivered with the CT scanner is able to run the post processing applications optionally.
The platform software for the SOMATOM Confidence, syngo CT VA62A (SOMARIS/7 VA62A), is a command-based program used for patient management, data management, X-ray scan control, image reconstruction, and image archive/evaluation. The SOMATOM Confidence will support the following modifications in comparison to the predicate devices:
- 1) New Marketing Name: SOMATOM Confidence (SOMATOM Confidence® RT Pro)
- 2) Modified Indication for Use Statement
- 3) New/Modified Hardware
- Touch Panels ●
- New Gantry and Patient Table Covers .
- Stellar RT Detector .
- 4) Software version SOMARIS/7 VA62A
- Data Exchange with external SW Client (Teamplay) ●
- IT Hardening .
- DirectDensity™ .
- 5) Update 510(k) Information
A comparison of these modifications with respect to the predicate devices in provided the "Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device" section below. The SOMATOM Confidence will be offered in 20 and 64 slice configurations.
#### V. Indications for Use
This computed tomography system is intended to generate and process cross-sectional images of patients by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data. The images delivered by the system can be used by a trained physician as an aid in diagnosis.
The images delivered by the system can be used by trained staff as an aid in diagnosis, treatment preparation and radiation therapy planning.
This CT system can be used for low dose lung cancer screening in high risk populations.*
*As defined by professional medical societies. Please refer to clinical literature, including the results of the National Lung Screening Trial (N Engl J Med 2011: 365:395-409) and subsequent literature, for further information.
#### VI. Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device
The SOMATOM Confidence provides the same technological characteristics in terms of materials, energy source, and control mechanisms when compared to the predicate devices. The software and hardware components of the SOMATOM Confidence have been modified or improved in comparison to the predicate device to support enhanced device functionality compared to the predicate device. The hardware components of the subject device have been modified to include a touch panel user interface, new gantry and patient table covers, and the Stellar RT Detector.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Software version SOMARIS/7 VA62 supports software features that are designed to enhance cybersecurity, and feature DirectDensity™ which provides CT images with an HU-like scaling that is nearly proportional to relative electron density. The intended use and fundamental scientific technology for the SOMATOM Confidence remains unchanged from the predicate devices.
#### At a high level, the subject and predicate devices are based on the following same technoloqical elements:
- Scanner Principle- Whole body X-Rav Computed Tomography Scanner System ● Acquisition - Continuously rotating tube detector system
- X-Rav Tube Straton MX P ●
- kV Steps - Adjustable kV acquisition steps
- Operating System Windows based operating platform ●
- Iterative Reconstruction Support of various optional iterative reconstruction ● methods
- . Workplaces - Support of workplaces that include reconstruction and image evaluation software
#### The following technological differences exist between the subject device and predicate devices:
- Support of touch panel user interface ●
- Reduced width 2 cm Stellar RT Detector ●
- Software version VA62A .
- DirectDensity™ Reconstruction, which provides CT images with an HU-like o scaling that is nearly proportional to relative electron density
- o Support of additional cvbersecurity features
Any differences in technological characteristics do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness. Siemens believes that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
Testing and validation is completed. Test results show that the subject device, the SOMATOM Confidence, is comparable to the predicate devices in terms of technological characteristics, safety and effectiveness and therefore is substantially equivalent.
# VII. Performance Data
### Non Clinical Testing
Non-clinical test (integration and functional) including phantom tests were conducted for the SOMATOM Confidence during product development. The modifications described in this Premarket Notification were supported with verification and validation testing. Siemens claims conformance to the following performance standards: ISO 14791, NEMA XR-29, IEC 61223-2-6, IEC 61223-3-5, IEC 62304, NEMA XR-25, and DICOM 3.1-3.20.
Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) testing were conducted on the SOMATOM Confidence in accordance with the following standards: IEC 60601-1, 60601-2-44, and 60601-1-2. Completed Form FDA 3654 are provided within this submission.
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### Verification and Validation
Software Documentation for a Moderate Level of Concern software per FDA's Guidance Document "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices" issued on May 11, 2005 is also included as part of this submission. The performance data demonstrates continued conformance with special controls for medical devices containing software. The Risk Analysis was completed and risk control implemented to mitigate identified hazards. The testing supports that all software specifications have met the acceptance criteria. Testing for verification and validation support the claims of substantial equivalence.
The performance testing data for optional reconstruction feature DirectDensity™ was acquired on a Siemens Healthineers SOMATOM Confidence with a Gammex 467 Tissue Characterization Phantom with varied arranqements of the tissue substitutes. Additional performance testing data for DirectDensity" was obtained from simulations. The results of verification and validation testing demonstrate that the subject device modifications for DirectDensity" - image values proportional to relative electron density and perform as expected. The testing results support that the requirement specifications have met the acceptance criteria. Testing for verification and validation of the device was found acceptable to support the claims for DirectDensity". Safety and performance parameters have not been affected by supporting DirectDensity™. The technical characteristics supporting DirectDensity"" do not change the indication for use, safety or efficacv.
Siemens conforms to the Cybersecurity requirements by implementing a process of preventing unauthorized access, modifications, misuse or denial of use, or the unauthorized use of information that is stored, accessed, or transferred from a medical device to an external recipient. Cybersecurity information in accordance with guidance document "Content of Premarket Submissions for Management of Cybersecurity Medical Devices issues on October 2, 2014" is included within this submission.
#### Additional Supportive Data
The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, is used to support the additional lung cancer screening Indications for Use. The study was a randomized trial of screening with the use of low-dose CT compared to chest radiography to determine whether screening with low-dose CT could reduce mortality from lung cancer. The study start date was August. 2002 and the completion date was October, 2010. The interpretation task with CT for this study was to detect lung nodules of 4mm diameter or greater.
#### Summary
Features described in this premarket notification are supported with verification and validation testing, supportive literature, dosimetry and imaging performance, and analysis of phantom images to assess device and feature performance during product development. The risk analysis was completed and risk control implemented to mitigate identified hazards. The test results show that all of the software specifications have met the acceptance criteria. Verification and validation testing of the device was found acceptable to support the claim of substantial equivalence.
#### General Safety and Effectiveness Concerns
The device labeling contains instructions for use as well as necessary cautions and warnings to provide for safe and effective use of the device. Risk management is ensured via a hazard analysis, which is used to identify potential hazards. These
{8}------------------------------------------------
potential hazards are controlled during development, verification and validation testing. In order to minimize electrical, mechanical, and radiation hazards. Siemens adheres to recognized and established industry practice and standards.
#### VIII. Conclusions
The predicate devices were cleared based on the results of non-clinical testing including verification and validation, phantom tests, and supportive literature. The subject device is also tested using the same methods as used for the predicate devices. The nonclinical data supports the safety of the device and the hardware and software verification and validation demonstrates that the SOMATOM Confidence should perform as intended in the specified use conditions. The data included in this submission demonstrates that the SOMATOM Confidence performs comparably to the predicate device that is currently marketed for the same intended use. Since both devices were tested using the same methods, Siemens believes that the data generated from the SOMATOM Confidence testing supports a finding of substantial equivalence.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.