The sponsor used 392 human whole blood samples to perform internal and external correlation studies to validate the accuracy of the CAPI 3 Hb A1c procedure against a predicate device.
Internal and External Correlation Studies; Method comparison study using clinical blood samples
Human whole blood samples with normal and elevated HbA1c levels; Sample Size: 392
Commercially available capillary electrophoresis technique (NGSP standardized)
HbA1c concentration (mmol/mol) and percentage (%) correlation
Indications for Use
The CAPI 3 HbA1c kit is designed for separation and quantification of the HbA1c glycated fraction of hemoglobin in venous whole blood, by capillary electrophoresis in alkaline buffer (pH 9.4) with the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument. Measurement of hemoglobin A1c is effective in monitoring long-term glycemic control in individuals with diabetes mellitus. This test is not for screening or diagnosis of diabetes. The CAPI 3 HbA1c kit is designed for Professional Use Only. The Multi-system HbA1c CAPILLARY Controls (2) are designed for the migration control and quality control of human glycated hemoglobin A1c quantification with SEBIA capillary electrophoresis procedures: CAPILLARYS HbA1c performed with the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING automated instrument, CAPI 3 HbA1c performed with the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA automated instrument and MINICAP HbA1c performed with the MINICAP FLEX-PIERCING automated instrument. The HbA1c CAPILLARY Controls are designed for Professional Use Only.
Device Story
CAPI 3 HbA1c kit uses capillary electrophoresis to quantify HbA1c in venous whole blood. Input: K2/K3 EDTA whole blood samples. Process: Sample dilution, injection into silica capillaries, high-voltage separation in alkaline buffer (pH 9.4), and direct absorbance detection at 415 nm. Output: Relative quantification of HbA1c fraction in % (NGSP) and mmol/mol (IFCC). Used in clinical laboratories; operated by professional staff on CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument. Software automatically processes migration patterns to identify hemoglobin fractions. Results assist clinicians in monitoring long-term glycemic control. Benefits: High-resolution separation allows quantification despite presence of labile HbA1c, carbamylated/acetylated hemoglobins, and major variants.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision/reproducibility evaluated across three instruments (Total CV 0.7-1.3% in NGSP units). Linearity confirmed 3.8-17.3% HbA1c. Interference studies show no significant impact from endogenous substances (bilirubin, lipids, etc.), common drugs, or hemoglobin variants (S, E, D, C, F, A2). Method comparison against predicate in 392 total samples showed high correlation (r ≥ 0.997).
Technological Characteristics
Capillary electrophoresis in free solution; silica capillaries (ID <100 µm); alkaline buffer (pH 9.4); 415 nm absorbance detection; Peltier temperature control; RFID-tagged reagents/racks; 12 parallel capillaries; PC/touchscreen interface; standalone instrument.
Indications for Use
Indicated for professional use in monitoring long-term glycemic control in individuals with diabetes mellitus. Not for screening or diagnosis of diabetes. Uses venous whole human blood.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glycosylated hemoglobin assay is a device used to measure the glycosylated hemoglobins (A1a , A1b , and A1c ) in a patient's blood by a column chromatographic procedure. Measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin is used to assess the level of control of a patient's diabetes and to determine the proper insulin dosage for a patient. Elevated levels of glycosylated hemoglobin indicate uncontrolled diabetes in a patient.
Predicate Devices
CAPILLARYS HbA1c Kit (k122101)
HbA1c CAPILLARY Controls (k122101, k133344)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
## 510(k) Number:
k162281
## B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
## C. Measurand:
Whole blood hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
## D. Type of Test:
Capillary Electrophoresis
## E. Applicant:
Sebia, Inc.
## F. Proprietary and Established Names:
CAPI 3 HbA1c
MULTI-SYSTEM HbA1c CAPILLARY Controls (2)
## G. Regulatory Information:
| Regulation section | Classification | Product code | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 21 CFR 864.7470 | II | LCP | Hematology (81) |
| 21 CFR 862.1660 | Class I, reserved | JJX | Chemistry (75) |
## H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for use below
{1}
2. Indication(s) for use:
The CAPI 3 HbA1c kit is designed for separation and quantification of the HbA1c glycated fraction of hemoglobin in venous whole blood, by capillary electrophoresis in alkaline buffer (pH 9.4) with the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument. Measurement of hemoglobin A1c is effective in monitoring long-term glycemic control in individuals with diabetes mellitus. This test is not for screening or diagnosis of diabetes. The CAPI 3 HbA1c kit is designed for Professional Use Only.
The Multi-system HbA1c CAPILLARY Controls (2) are designed for the migration control and quality control of human glycated hemoglobin A1c quantification with SEBIA capillary electrophoresis procedures: CAPILLARYS HbA1c performed with the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING automated instrument, CAPI 3 HbA1c performed with the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA automated instrument and MINICAP HbA1c performed with the MINICAP FLEX-PIERCING automated instrument. The HbA1c CAPILLARY Controls are designed for Professional Use Only.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For Prescription Use Only.
The CAPI 3 HbA1c kit should not be used:
- for "Point-of-Care" use
- for the screening or diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
- in monitoring daily glucose control
- to replace daily home testing of urine and blood glucose levels
- for analyzing samples from patients with conditions causing shortened red blood cell survival, such as hemolytic diseases, pregnancy and significant acute or chronic blood loss
- for analyzing samples from patients with total hemoglobin levels of less than 2.9 or greater than 30.5 g/dL and any hemoglobinopathies that may interfere.
Test results for the CAPI 3 HbA1c kit show that there is not significant interference for Hemoglobin C (≤ 36.9 %), Hemoglobin D (≤ 44.2 %), Hemoglobin E (≤ 26.6 %), Hemoglobin S (≤ 40.4 %), and Hemoglobin F (< 23%).
4. Special instrument requirements:
CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument
I. Device Description:
The CAPI 3 HbA1c kit and controls are to be used with the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument. The components are summarized as follows:
The CAPI 3 HbA1c kit contains a ready to use buffer solution pH 9.4 ± 0.5 (2 vials, 700 mL
{2}
each), a ready to use hemolysing solution (1 vial, 700 mL) and filters (4 filters per kit).
The MULTI-SYSTEM HbA1c CAPILLARY Controls (2) consist of a HbA1c CAPILLARY Control 1 (normal HbA1c level, 1 vial) and HbA1c CAPILLARY Control 2 (elevated HbA1c level, 1 vial). The MULTI-SYSTEM HbA1c CAPILLARY Controls (2) are obtained from pools of human blood samples and contain stabilizers and preservatives to maintain the stability of the hemoglobin fractions. The controls are in a stabilized lyophilized form.
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
CAPILLARYS HbA1c Kit
HbA1c CAPILLARY Controls
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k122101, k133344
3. Comparison with predicate:
CAPI 3 HbA1c
| Similarities/Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | CAPI 3 HbA1c Candidate Device (k162281) | CAPILLARYS HbA1c Kit Predicate Device (k122101) |
| Intended Use | Measurement of hemoglobin A1c is for use in monitoring long-term glycemic control in individuals with diabetes mellitus. | Same |
| Method | Free solution capillary electrophoresis | Same |
| Sample type | Whole blood | Same |
| Collection tubes | K3 EDTA and K2 EDTA | Same |
| Measuring Range | 4.0 to 14.7 % HbA1c | Same |
| Shelf life | Buffer: 3 years at 2 - 8 °C
Hemolysing solution: 3 years at 2 - 30 °C | Same |
| Instrument | SEBIA CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument | SEBIA CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument |
| Absorbance wavelength | 415 nm | Same |
| Software for data processing | PHORESISTM software | Same |
| Number of separation units | 12 parallel capillaries | 8 parallel capillaries |
{3}
MULTI-SYSTEM HbA1c CAPILLARY Controls (2)
| Similarities/Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device: MULTI-SYSTEM HbA1c CAPILLARY Controls (2) (k162281) | Predicate Device: HbA1c CAPILLARY Controls (k122101 and k133344) |
| Intended Use | Intended for use as quality control materials. | Same |
| Format | 2 levels | Same |
| Shelf life | 3 years at 2 - 8 °C | Same |
| In use storage | CAPILLARYS HbA1c: When reconstituted the controls are stable for 1 day at 2-8°C, 6 months at -18°C and -30°C. Do not freeze and thaw the reconstituted controls more than 30 times. When hemolyzed, the controls are stable for 8 hours at 2-8°C, 1 month at -18°C and -30°C. Do not freeze and thaw a dilution segment with hemolyzed control more than three times.
MINICAP HbA1c and CAPI 3 HbA1c: When reconstituted the controls are stable for 1 day at 2-8°C, 6 months at -18°C and -30°C. Do not freeze and thaw the reconstituted controls more than 30 times. | CAPILLARYS HbA1c: When reconstituted the controls are stable for 1 day at 2-8°C, 6 months at -18°C and -30°C.
Do not freeze and thaw the reconstituted controls more than 30 times. When hemolyzed the controls are stable for 8 hours at 2-8°C, 1 month at -18°C and -30°C. Do not freeze and thaw a dilution segment with hemolyzed control more than three times.
MINICAP HbA1c: When reconstituted the controls are stable for 1 day at 2-8°C, 6 months at -18°C and -30°C.
Do not freeze and thaw the reconstituted controls more than 30 times. |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI Guideline, EP05-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Devices
CLSI Guideline, EP06-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Analytical Methods
CLSI Guideline, EP07-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry
CLSI Guideline, EP09-A2: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples
CLSI Guideline, EP14-A2: Evaluation of Matrix Effects
L. Test Principle:
The CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument uses the principle of capillary electrophoresis in free solution. With this technique, charged molecules are separated by their electrophoretic mobility in an alkaline buffer with a specific pH. Separation occurs according to the
{4}
electrolyte pH and electroosmotic flow.
The CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument has silica capillaries functioning in parallel allowing 12 simultaneous analyses of HbA1c quantification in a whole blood sample. A sample dilution with hemolysing solution is prepared and injected by aspiration at the anodic end of the capillary. A high voltage protein separation is then performed and direct detection of the hemoglobins is made at the cathodic end of the capillary at 415 nm, which is the absorbance wavelength specific to hemoglobins. Before each run, the capillaries are washed with a wash solution and prepared for the next analysis with buffer.
Direct detection provides accurate relative quantification of individual hemoglobin A1c fraction. In addition, the high resolution of CAPI 3 HbA1c procedure allows the quantification of HbA1c even in the presence of labile HbA1c, carbamylated and acetylated hemoglobins, and major hemoglobin variants.
By using an alkaline pH buffer, normal and abnormal (or variant) hemoglobins are detected in the following order, from cathode to anode: A2/C, E, S/D, F, A0, other Hb (including minor HbA1) and then HbA1c.
At the end of analysis, relative quantification of individual HbA1c fraction is performed automatically. The HbA1c concentrations are standardized and indicated in %HbA1c (DCCT/NGSP) and in mmol/mol (IFCC) units.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Four different EDTA whole blood samples and four whole blood quality control solutions were run using the CAPI 3 HbA1c procedure on three CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instruments. Each sample was analyzed in duplicate on 2 capillaries per run, 2 runs per day. The results are shown below:
{5}
# Results in NGSP units (%HbA1c) - % CV by Sample
Instruments Combined
| Sample | Mean (%) | Within capillary | Between capillary | Between run | Between day | Between lot | Between instrument | Total* |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample 1 | 4.8 | 0.9% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 1.2% |
| Sample 2 | 6.4 | 0.9% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 1.1% |
| Sample 3 | 8.9 | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.8% |
| Sample 4 | 12.0 | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.7% |
| Control 1 | 5.1 | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 1.3% |
| Control 2 | 8.3 | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.9% | 1.1% |
| Calibrator 1 | 5.3 | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 1.2% |
| Calibrator 2 | 9.9 | 0.6% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.7% |
*Total Reproducibility includes: within-capillary, between-capillary, between-run, between-day, between-lot and between-instrument.
Instrument 1 (%CV by Sample, NGSP % HbA1c)
| Sample | Mean (%) | Within capillary | Between capillary | Between run | Between day | Between lot | Total* |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample 1 | 4.8 | 1.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 1.2% |
| Sample 2 | 6.4 | 1.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 1.1% |
| Sample 3 | 8.9 | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.9% |
| Sample 4 | 12.0 | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.7% |
| Control 1 | 5.1 | 1.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 1.2% |
| Control 2 | 8.3 | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.6% |
| Calibrator 1 | 5.3 | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 1.2% |
| Calibrator 2 | 9.9 | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.7% |
*Total Reproducibility includes: within-capillary, between-capillary, between-run, between-day and between-lot.
Instrument 2 (%CV by Sample, NGSP % HbA1c)
| Sample | Mean (%) | Within capillary | Between capillary | Between run | Between day | Between lot | Total* |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample 1 | 4.8 | 0.9% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.7% | 1.3% |
| Sample 2 | 6.4 | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 1.1% |
| Sample 3 | 8.9 | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.8% |
| Sample 4 | 12.0 | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.7% |
| Control 1 | 5.1 | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 1.2% |
| Control 2 | 8.3 | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.8% |
| Calibrator 1 | 5.3 | 0.7% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.3% | 1.1% |
| Calibrator 2 | 9.9 | 0.6% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.7% |
*Total Reproducibility includes: within-capillary, between-capillary, between-run, between-day and between-lot.
{6}
Instrument 3 (%CV by Sample, NGSP % HbA1c)
| Sample | Mean (%) | Within capillary | Between capillary | Between run | Between day | Between lot | Total * |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample 1 | 4.8 | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 1.2% |
| Sample 2 | 6.4 | 0.8% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 1.0% |
| Sample 3 | 8.9 | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.8% |
| Sample 4 | 12.0 | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.7% |
| Control 1 | 5.1 | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 1.3% |
| Control 2 | 8.3 | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.7% |
| Calibrator 1 | 5.3 | 1.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 1.2% |
| Calibrator 2 | 9.9 | 0.6% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.7% |
*Total Reproducibility includes: within-capillary, between-capillary, between-run, between-day and between-lot.
## Results in IFCC units (mmol/mol)
Instruments Combined
| Sample | Mean (mmol/mol) | Within capillary | Between capillary | Between run | Between day | Between lot | Between instrument | Total * |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample 1 | 29 | 1.6% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 2.3% |
| Sample 2 | 46 | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.1% | 1.6% |
| Sample 3 | 73 | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 1.0% |
| Sample 4 | 108 | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.9% |
| Control 1 | 33 | 1.5% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 2.2% |
| Control 2 | 67 | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.5% |
| Calibrator 1 | 35 | 1.5% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 1.9% |
| Calibrator 2 | 85 | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.9% |
*Total Reproducibility includes: within-capillary, between-capillary, between-run, between-day, between-lot and between-instrument.
Instrument 1 (%CV by Sample, IFCC units)
| Sample | Mean (mmol/mol) | Within capillary | Between capillary | Between run | Between day | Between lot | Total* |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample 1 | 29 | 1.7% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 2.2% |
| Sample 2 | 46 | 1.4% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.4% | 1.8% |
| Sample 3 | 73 | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 1.0% |
| Sample 4 | 108 | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.9% |
| Control 1 | 33 | 1.6% | 1.4% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 2.3% |
| Control 2 | 67 | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.9% |
| Calibrator 1 | 35 | 1.5% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 1.9% |
| Calibrator 2 | 85 | 0.6% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.9% |
*Total Reproducibility includes: within-capillary, between-capillary, between-run, between-day and between-lot.
{7}
Instrument 2 (%CV by Sample, IFCC units)
| Sample | Mean (mmol/mol) | Within capillary | Between capillary | Between run | Between day | Between lot | Total* |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample 1 | 29 | 1.6% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 1.4% | 2.4% |
| Sample 2 | 46 | 1.6% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 1.7% |
| Sample 3 | 73 | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 1.0% |
| Sample 4 | 108 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Control 1 | 33 | 1.4% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 1.9% |
| Control 2 | 67 | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.9% |
| Calibrator 1 | 35 | 1.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 1.5% |
| Calibrator 2 | 85 | 0.8% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.9% |
*Total Reproducibility includes: within-capillary, between-capillary, between-run, between-day and between-lot.
Instrument 3 (%CV by Sample, IFCC units)
| Sample | Mean (mmol/mol) | Within capillary | Between capillary | Between run | Between day | Between lot | Total* |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample 1 | 29 | 1.6% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 2.2% |
| Sample 2 | 46 | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.6% | 1.5% |
| Sample 3 | 73 | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.6% | 1.0% |
| Sample 4 | 108 | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.8% |
| Control 1 | 33 | 1.4% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 2.1% |
| Control 2 | 67 | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 1.0% |
| Calibrator 1 | 35 | 1.7% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 2.2% |
| Calibrator 2 | 85 | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.8% |
*Total Reproducibility includes: within-capillary, between-capillary, between-run, between-day and between-lot.
## b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The linearity of the CAPI 3 HbA1c procedure was evaluated based on CLSI EP06-A guideline Evaluation of the Linearity Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach. Two blood samples, including a normal sample with HbA1c concentration at 3.8 % HbA1c (18 mmol/mol) and an elevated HbA1c level sample with HbA1c concentration at 17.3 % HbA1c (166 mmol/mol) were mixed within different proportions and the mixtures were electrophoresed with the CAPI 3 Hb A1c procedure. For each mixture, samples were analyzed in triplicate.
The following table summarizes the results obtained for the 1st order linear regression generated using both NGSP (%HbA1c) and IFCC units (mmol/mol).
| Units | Slope | y-intercept | Correlation coefficient |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NGSP (%HbA1c) | 0.9959 | -0.2692 | 0.997 |
| IFCC (mmol/mol) | 1.0018 | -3.3565 | 0.998 |
{8}
The study supports the sponsors claimed linearity range of 3.8 - 17.3 % HbA1c (18 - 166 mmol/mol). The reportable range of the device is from 4.0% to 14.7% HbA1c (20 - 138 mmol/mol).
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
**Traceability:**
The CAPI 3 HbA1c assay is certified with the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP). The NGSP certification expires in one year. See NGSP website for current certification at http://www.ngsp.org.
**Value assignment:**
The HbA1c CAPILLARY Calibrators were previously cleared and reviewed in k122101 and k133344. The MULTI-SYSTEM HbA1c CAPILLARY Control (2) values are assigned by multiple measurements using multiple CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instruments and IFCC traceable calibrators.
**Stability:**
The stability protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and determined to be adequate. The expiration dates of the different components of the CAPI 3 HbA1c kit are indicated as follows:
| Kit Component | Shelf-Life | On Board Stability |
| --- | --- | --- |
| CAPI 3 HbA1c
hemolysing solution | 3 years at 2-8°C and 15-30°C | 2 months |
| CAPI 3 HbA1c buffer | 3 years at 2-8°C | 1 month |
| CAPI 3 HbA1c wash
solution | 3 years at 2-8°C and 15-30°C | 121 days |
The MULTI-SYSTEM HbA1c CAPILLARY Control (2) is demonstrated to be stable for 1 day at 2-8°C, up to 6 months at -22°C/-18°C. The labeling states that the MULTI-SYSTEM HbA1c CAPILLARY Control (2) should not be frozen and thawed more than 30 times.
d. Detection limit:
The Limit of Blank (LoB) and Limit of Detection (LoD) were determined by assaying five samples without HbAc1 and five low HbA1c samples, respectively. Both LoB and LoD were tested according to CLSI guideline EP17-A2. The results are as follows:
$$
\mathrm{LoB} = 0.1\%, \mathrm{LoD} = 1.2\%
$$
{9}
# e. Analytical specificity:
# i. Endogenous Interference
Studies were performed to assess endogenous substances that could interfere with the CAPI 3 HbA1c assay. The interfering substances were evaluated in venous whole blood EDTA samples that contained two to four different concentrations of HbA1c (including normal, around cut-off and high levels of HbA1c). Samples containing potential interferents were tested and the results compared to those obtained from control samples containing no potential interfering substances. Samples were analyzed in triplicates. The sponsor's definition of non-significant interference is $\leq 0.3\%$ HbA1c (or $\leq 9.9$ mmol/mol) between the tested and the control samples. The results are summarized in the following table:
Concentration at which no significant interference $(\leq 0.3\%)$ was observed
| Potential interfering substance | Concentration |
| --- | --- |
| Ascorbic Acid | 60 mg/dL (3.41 mM) |
| Bilirubin | 35.9 mg/dL (614 mM) |
| Rheumatoid factor | 2178 IU/mL |
| Triglycerides | 3.85 g/dL (43.97mM) |
| Urea | 277 mg/dL (46.1 mM) |
| Glucose | 1000 mg/dL (55 mmol/L) |
| Total Protein | 149.5 g/L |
# ii. Exogenous Interference
Studies were performed to assess common or known substances that could interfere with the CAPI 3 HbA1c assay. The interfering substances were evaluated in venous whole blood EDTA samples that contained two to four different concentrations of HbA1c (including around cut-off and high levels of HbA1c). Samples containing potential interferents were tested and the results compared to those obtained from control samples containing no potential interfering substances. Samples were analyzed in triplicates. The sponsor's definition of non-significant interference is $\leq 0.3\%$ HbA1c (or $\leq 9.9$ mmol/mol) between the tested and the control samples. The results are summarized in the following table:
Concentration at which no significant interference $(\leq 0.3\%)$ was observed
| Potential interfering substance | Concentration |
| --- | --- |
| Glybenclamide | 3 mg/dL |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 1000 mg/dL (55.56 mmol/L) |
| Ibuprofen | 500 mg/L (2427 μmol/L) |
| Acetaminophen | 200 mg/L (1325 μmol/L) |
| Metformin | 5 mg/dL (387 μmol/L) |
{10}
iii. Cross Reactivity with Hemoglobin Derivatives
To study interference from carbamylated hemoglobin, four EDTA whole blood patient samples with HbA1c concentrations at ~5.2%, ~6.9%, ~8.8% and ~11.9% were split into two aliquots. One aliquot, at each HbA1c level, was spiked with 1 mmol/L of potassium cyanate and incubated for 3 hours at 37°C. Another aliquot, at each HbA1c level, was incubated for 3 hours at 37°C. Samples were then analyzed on the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument using the CAPI 3 HbA1c assay kit. Samples were analyzed in triplicate. The sponsor’s definition of non-significant interference is ≤ 0.3 HbA1c% between the tested and the control samples. The sponsor concluded that presence of up to 5.6% carbamylated hemoglobin does not interfere with this assay.
To study interference from labile hemoglobin, four EDTA whole blood patient samples with HbA1c concentrations at ~5.1%, ~6.7%, 8.4% and ~12.3% were split into two aliquots. One aliquot, at each HbA1c level, was spiked with glucose (50 g/L) and incubated for 3 hours at 37°C. Another aliquot, at each HbA1c level, was incubated for 3 hours at 37°C. Samples were then analyzed on the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument using the CAPI 3 HbA1c assay kit. Samples were tested in triplicate. The sponsor’s definition of non-significant interference is ≤ 0.3 HbA1c% between the tested and the control samples. The sponsor concluded that labile HbA1c up to 1257 mg/dL (12.7%) does not interfere with this assay.
To study interference from acetylated hemoglobin, four EDTA whole blood samples with HbA1c concentrations at ~5.7%, 6.3%, 8.1% and ~12.1% were split into two aliquots. One aliquot, at each HbA1c level, was used as the control sample and the other aliquot was spiked with acetylsalicylic acid (10 mmol/L) and incubated for 4 hours at 37°C. All aliquots were tested on the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument using the CAPI 3 HbA1c assay kit. Samples were tested in triplicate. The sponsor’s definition of non-significant interference is ≤ 0.3 HbA1c%. The sponsor concluded that acetylated hemoglobin up to 2.1% does not interfere with this assay.
iv. Hemoglobin Variant Interference
A hemoglobin variant interference study was carried out using samples known to contain Hemoglobin variants S, E, D and C. These variant samples were tested on the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument using the CAPI 3 HbA1c assay kit. The sponsor’s definition of non-significant interference is ±10% difference between the candidate method and the comparative method. The testing results show there is no significant interference for Hb S (≤ 40.4%), Hb E (≤ 26.6%), Hb D (≤ 44.2%) and Hb C (≤ 36.9%).
{11}
The sponsor includes the following limitation in their labeling: “due to the number of variants, the presence of another hemoglobin variant may be observed in the HbA1c migration zone; in the case of a shoulder on HbA1c, no result will be reported by the software.”
A variant interference study was carried out to study the variant interference from Hemoglobin F. Twenty-two different EDTA whole blood samples with HbA1c concentrations between 5.1 and 15.1% and varying concentrations of HbF (from 1.5 to 23.7%) were tested on the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument using the CAPI 3 HbA1c assay kit. The sponsor’s definition of non-significant interference is ±10% difference between the candidate method and the comparative method.
The testing results show there is no significant interference for Hb F ≤ 23% therefore the sponsor has included the following limitation in their labeling: Levels of Hb F up to 23% in the blood sample do not interfere with HbA1c fraction quantification, a result is reported by the software when the Hb F level is higher than 23% along with a warning message “Atypical profile - Possible quantitative interference if Hb F or variant > 23%”.
An additional variant interference study was carried out to study the variant interference from Hemoglobin A2 (HbA2). Four EDTA whole blood samples with HbA1c concentrations at ~5.0%, 6.7%, 9.0%, and 11.8% were split into two aliquots. One aliquot, at each HbA1c level, was used as the control sample and the other aliquot was spiked with varying concentrations of purified HbA2 (from 9.3 to 11.3%). Samples were analyzed in triplicates on the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument using the CAPI 3 HbA1c assay kit. The sponsor’s definition of non-significant interference is ≤0.3% difference between the tested and the control samples.
The sponsor concluded that Hb A2 up to 11.3% does not interfere with this assay.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not-applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The levels of HbA1c were measured in 100 EDTA whole blood samples, both by electrophoretic separations obtained with the CAPI 3 HbA1c procedure on the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument and a commercially available capillary electrophoresis technique for HbA1c quantification that is NGSP standardized. The measured values of HbA1c concentrations and percentages from both procedures were analyzed by a linear regression statistical procedure. The results of linear regression analysis are summarized below:
{12}
| HbAc1 units | Correlation Coefficient | Intercept | Slope | HbA1c Range |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NGSP | 0.998 | -0.024 | 1.000 | 4.1 - 14.2 % |
| IFCC | 0.998 | -0.238 | 1.000 | 22 - 132 mmol/mol |
# External sites:
In study No. 1, the levels of HbA1c were measured in 175 EDTA whole blood samples, including samples with normal and elevated HbA1c levels, by electrophoretic separations obtained with CAPI 3 HbA1c procedure with the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument and a commercially available capillary electrophoresis technique for HbA1c quantification that is NGSP standardized. The measured values of HbA1c concentrations and percentages from both procedures were analyzed by a linear regression statistical procedure. The results of linear regression analysis are summarized below:
| HbAc1 units | Correlation Coefficient | Intercept | Slope | HbA1c Range |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NGSP | 0.997 | 0.045 | 0.992 | 4.3 - 14.7 % |
| IFCC | 0.998 | 0.249 | 0.993 | 23 – 138 mmol/mol |
In study No. 2, the levels of HbA1c were measured in 117 EDTA whole blood samples, including samples with normal and elevated HbA1c levels, both by electrophoretic separations obtained with CAPI 3 HbA1c procedure with the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument and a commercially available capillary electrophoresis technique for HbA1c quantification that is NGSP standardized. The measured values of HbA1c concentrations and percentages from both procedures were analyzed by a linear regression statistical procedure. The results of linear regression analysis are summarized below:
| HbAc1 units | Correlation Coefficient | Intercept | Slope | HbA1c Range |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NGSP | 0.998 | 0.205 | 0.968 | 4.2 - 13.7% |
| IFCC | 0.998 | 1.417 | 0.970 | 22 – 127 mmol/mol |
# b. Matrix comparison:
A total of 41 matched sample pairs (K2 EDTA and K3 EDTA) were tested on the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument using the CAPI 3 HbA1c assay kit. The linear regression is presented in the table below:
| HbAc1 units | Correlation Coefficient | Intercept | Slope | HbA1c Range |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NGSP | 0.999 | 0.085 | 0.988 | 4.2 - 13.8% |
| IFCC | 0.999 | 0.934 | 0.982 | 24 - 127 mmol/mol |
{13}
Venous whole blood samples collected in K2 EDTA and K3 EDTA have been shown to be acceptable for use with the CAPI 3 HbA1c assay using the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument.
## 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not-applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not-applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not-applicable
## 4. Clinical cut-off:
Not-applicable
## 5. Expected values/Reference range:
The sponsor states the following:
Hemoglobin A1c expected value range was cited from the American Diabetes Association (Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2012, 35 (Suppl 1) S11 – S63).
The American Diabetes Association’s (ADA) most recent Clinical Practice
| Category | HbA1c Range (NGSP/DCCT) |
| --- | --- |
| Normal | < 5.7% |
| Prediabetes
(increased risk for diabetes) | 5.7% - 6.4% |
| Diabetes | ≥ 6.5% |
The expected HbA1c range for non-diabetic adults is 4 - 6%. However, each laboratory should establish its reference range and HbA1c goal in their country of business taking into account sex, age, ethnicity and individual patient situation.
{14}
N. Instrument Name:
CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device?
☑ Yes ☐ X or No
Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?
☑ Yes ☐ or No ☐ X
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
☑ Yes ☐ X or No
3. Specimen Identification:
Barcode reader
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Use K2 EDTA or K3 EDTA whole blood samples. Capped primary sample tubes (containing over 800 µL) are placed on sample racks, which are loaded on the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument. The mixing system with rack inversion allows homogenization before sample collection by the sample probe directly on capped tubes for the HbA1c analysis.
5. Calibration:
Calibration must be performed for the first use of the HbA1c analysis program with the CAPILLARYS 3 instrument and after having changed the lot number of calibrators. Additional calibration should be performed after having changed the lot number of analysis buffer, after technical operation, in case of analyses of controls giving HbA1c values outside the expected values (and after having confirmed this deviation by a second analysis of blood controls), after having changed capillaries (whatever the number of
{15}
replaced capillaries), and at least every 2 months. Calibration is performed using the HbA1c CAPILLARY Calibrators.
6. Quality Control:
Labeling for the device states that it is recommended to analyze one of the two HbA1c CAPILLARY Controls on whole capillaries after capillaries activation, after each calibration of the instrument performed with the HbA1c CAPILLARY Calibrators, and after a capillary cleaning sequence with CAPICLEAN. In routine, it is recommended to analyze the HbA1c control at the beginning and at the end of the analysis series, alternating the Control 1 and the Control 2. In the case of a migration shift leading to a non-recognition of fractions, it is recommended to analyze immediately one of the two HbA1c controls.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
Not applicable
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.