K162076 · bioMerieux, Inc. · JSO · Oct 25, 2016 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K162076
Device Name
chromID MRSA
Applicant
bioMerieux, Inc.
Product Code
JSO · Microbiology
Decision Date
Oct 25, 2016
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.1700
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
chromID™ MRSA agar is a selective and differential chromogenic medium for: a. The qualitative detection of nasal colonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), to aid in the prevention and control of MRSA in healthcare settings. The test is performed on anterior nares swab specimens from patients and healthcare workers to screen for MRSA colonization. chromID™ MRSA when used to detect nasal colonization is not intended to diagnose, guide, or monitor therapy for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin. b. The qualitative detection of MRSA from skin and skin structure infections. chromID™ MRSA is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory tests and clinical data available to aid in the identification and diagnosis of MRSA infections. Concomitant cultures for skin and skin structure infections are necessary to recover organisms for further microbiological susceptibility testing, or epidemiological typing. A negative result does not preclude MRSA infection. chromID™ MRSA is not intended to monitor treatment for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin. c. The qualitative detection of MRSA from positive blood cultures demonstrating Gram-positive cocci on Gram stain. chromID™ MRSA is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory tests and clinical data available to aid in the identification and diagnosis of MRSA infections. Sub-culturing for positive blood cultures are necessary to recover organisms for further microbiological susceptibility testing or epidemiological typing. A negative result does not preclude MRSA infection. chromID™ MRSA is not intended to monitor treatment for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin.
Device Story
chromID™ MRSA agar is a selective/differential chromogenic medium for MRSA detection. Input: aliquot from positive blood culture bottle (Gram-positive cocci). Operation: antibiotic mixture inhibits non-Staphylococcus/yeast; chromogenic substrate cleavage by S. aureus produces green colonies. Output: visual identification of green colonies after 24-hour aerobic incubation at 35-37°C. Used in clinical microbiology laboratories by trained personnel. Results aid clinicians in identifying MRSA infections; requires sub-culturing for further susceptibility testing. Benefits: rapid, direct identification of MRSA from positive blood cultures.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study evaluated 863 positive blood culture specimens. Compared to reference method (BAP + confirmatory testing), chromID MRSA demonstrated 100% sensitivity (215/215) and 98.9% specificity (641/648). Analytical studies included reproducibility (100% agreement), limit of detection (10-100 CFU/mL), cross-reactivity, and interference testing. Bench testing confirmed performance across various blood culture bottle types (BacT/ALERT and BACTEC).
Technological Characteristics
Selective/differential chromogenic agar medium. Contains nutritive base, peptones, antibiotic mixture (including cefoxitin), and α-glucosidase chromogenic substrate. Manual incubation at 35-37°C for 24 hours under aerobic conditions. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of MRSA nasal colonization in patients/healthcare workers, MRSA from skin/skin structure infections, and MRSA from positive blood cultures (Gram-positive cocci). Not for monitoring treatment or determining methicillin susceptibility.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A culture medium for antimicrobial susceptibility tests is a device intended for medical purposes that consists of any medium capable of supporting the growth of many of the bacterial pathogens that are subject to antimicrobial susceptibility tests. The medium should be free of components known to be antagonistic to the common agents for which susceptibility tests are performed in the treatment of disease.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K162076
B. Purpose for Submission:
To obtain a substantial equivalence determination for chromID™ MRSA agar with a new intended use for the qualitative detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus from positive blood cultures demonstrating Gram-positive cocci on Gram stain.
C. Measurand:
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
D. Type of Test:
Detection of MRSA using a selective and differential chromogenic media
E. Applicant:
bioMérieux, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
chromID™ MRSA Agar
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 866.1700
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
JSO: Culture media, Antimicrobial susceptibility test, excluding Mueller Hinton Agar
{1}
4. Panel:
Microbiology (83)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
chromID™ MRSA agar is a selective and differential chromogenic medium for:
a. The qualitative detection of nasal colonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), to aid in the prevention and control of MRSA in healthcare settings. The test is performed on anterior nares swab specimens from patients and healthcare workers to screen for MRSA colonization. chromID™ MRSA when used to detect nasal colonization is not intended to diagnose, guide, or monitor therapy for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin.
b. The qualitative detection of MRSA from skin and skin structure infections. chromID™ MRSA is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory tests and clinical data available to aid in the identification and diagnosis of MRSA infections. Concomitant cultures for skin and skin structure infections are necessary to recover organisms for further microbiological susceptibility testing, or epidemiological typing. A negative result does not preclude MRSA infection. chromID™ MRSA is not intended to monitor treatment for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin.
c. The qualitative detection of MRSA from positive blood cultures demonstrating Gram-positive cocci on Gram stain. chromID™ MRSA is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory tests and clinical data available to aid in the identification and diagnosis of MRSA infections. Sub-culturing for positive blood cultures are necessary to recover organisms for further microbiological susceptibility testing or epidemiological typing. A negative result does not preclude MRSA infection. chromID™ MRSA is not intended to monitor treatment for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin.
2. Indication(s) for use:
See Intended Use.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
Prescription Use
4. Special instrument requirements:
The performance of chromID MRSA has not been established for blood culture bottle types other than those shown in Table 3 below.
2
{2}
I. Device Description:
chromID MRSA is a selective medium for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The selectivity of this medium is based on the presence of antibiotics that inhibit most bacteria not belonging to the genus Staphylococcus and yeasts. The medium favors the growth of MRSA including hetero-resistant strains, which will appear as green colonies on the agar medium. Colorless colonies growing on the agar are considered negative for MRSA.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Remel Spectra™ MRSA
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K092407
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | chromID™ MRSA agar is a selective and differential chromogenic medium for:
a. The qualitative detection of nasal colonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), to aid in the prevention and control of MRSA in healthcare settings. The test is performed on anterior nares swab specimens from patients and healthcare workers to screen for MRSA colonization. chromID™ MRSA when used to detect nasal colonization is not intended to diagnose, guide, or monitor therapy for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin.
b. The qualitative detection of MRSA from skin and skin structure infections. chromID™ MRSA is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory tests and clinical data available to aid in the identification and diagnosis of MRSA infections. Concomitant cultures for skin and skin structure | Remel Spectra™ MRSA is a selective and differential chromogenic medium recommended for use in the qualitative detection of nasal colonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to aid in the prevention and control of MRSA in healthcare settings. The test is performed with anterior nares swab specimens from patients and healthcare workers to screen for MRSA colonization. Spectra™ MRSA is not intended to diagnose MRSA infection or to guide or monitor treatment for infections. Spectra™ MRSA is also intended for use in the qualitative detection of MRSA from positive blood cultures demonstrating Gram-positive cocci on Gram stain. Spectra™ MRSA is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory tests and clinical data available to the clinician as an aid in the detection of MRSA from patient positive blood cultures. |
{3}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | infections are necessary to recover organisms for further microbiological susceptibility testing or epidemiological typing. A negative result does not preclude MRSA infection. chromID™ MRSA is not intended to monitor treatment for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin. c. The qualitative detection of MRSA from positive blood cultures demonstrating Gram-positive cocci on Gram stain. chromID™ MRSA is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory tests and clinical data available to aid in the identification and diagnosis of MRSA infections. Sub-culturing for positive blood cultures are necessary to recover organisms for further microbiological susceptibility testing or epidemiological typing. A negative result does not preclude MRSA infection. chromID™ MRSA is not intended to monitor treatment for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin. | Spectra™ MRSA is not intended to monitor treatment for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin. All positive blood bottles should be sub-cultured for further microbiological/susceptibility testing. |
| Reporting | MRSA | MRSA |
| Reading | Manual | Manual |
| Specimen Type | Anterior nares swab specimens and Positive blood cultures | Anterior nares swab specimens and Positive blood cultures |
| Test Methodology | Selective and differential chromogenic agar | Selective and differential chromogenic agar |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Specimen Type | Specimens from skin and skin structure infection | Device not indicated for this specimen type |
| Growth Detection | Green colonies after 24 hours incubation | Small to medium denim-blue colonies after 24 hours |
{4}
5
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100-S23. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-third Informational Supplement, Vol. 33 No. 1, January 2013.
L. Test Principle:
chromID MRSA is a selective medium for the detection and direct identification of MRSA. The selectivity of this medium is based on the presence of an antibiotic mixture that inhibits most bacteria not belonging to the genus Staphylococcus, as well as yeasts. Identification is based on the cleavage of a chromogenic substrate in the medium by the Staphylococcus aureus present, leading to a green coloration of the growing Staphylococcus aureus colonies. An aliquot from a positive blood culture bottle (exhibiting Gram-positive cocci) is inoculated directly onto the chromID MRSA agar plates and incubated aerobically at 35°-37°C for 24 hours. The cultures are examined after 24 hours incubation for the presence of green colonies, in which the presence of at least one green colony gives the sample a positive MRSA status. Any color of green should be interpreted as a positive result. No growth or colonies presenting as other than green in appearance is interpreted as a negative result.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
To support the addition of a new specimen type (positive blood culture), a Reproducibility Study was conducted at three sites using a blinded panel of ten well-characterized Staphylococcus aureus strains, including both mecA positive and mecA negative isolates. At each site, panel members were tested in triplicate at 1×10³ CFU/ml each day for five days with multiple operators. To simulate positive blood cultures, all ten strains were tested using broth from blood culture bottles as the diluent. chromID MRSA plates were observed for the growth of green colonies at 24 hours. All strains produced the expected results with chromID MRSA (450/450). Isolates were also plated on BAP to ensure viability and purity of cultures. Broths from the following blood culture bottles were used during testing: BacT/Alert FA Plus (Aerobic) and BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F Medium.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not Applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Quality control (QC) testing was performed at each testing site for growth/color development on chromID MRSA. Two quality control organisms (Staphylococcus
{5}
aureus ATCC 29213 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300) were tested at each study site on chromID MRSA for each day of testing. The strains were also subcultured to ensure viability of the organism. QC testing results provided expected reactions at the four testing sites on each day tested (Table 1). The submitted QC data are acceptable.
Table 1. QC Data Summary
| QC Strain | Methicillin Resistant | mecA PCR | Expected Results after 24 hrs at 35-37°C | Correct QC Results (all sites) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 | No | NEG | No growth | 297/297 |
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300 | Yes | POS | Growth-green colonies | 297/297 |
d. Detection limit:
Recovery Study
Since the current submission was for the addition of a new specimen type to the intended use of chromID MRSA agar, a repeat of the Recovery Study was not needed to support device performance. A short description of results from the Recovery Study in K151688 is provided below.
According to K151688, the lowest concentration of MRSA organisms demonstrating growth with a positive result was $10^{3}$ CFU/ml for one MRSA strain (ATCC 43300) and $10^{5}$ CFU/ml for the second MRSA strain (CDC Mu3-8R) at 24 hours.
Analytical Reactivity and Expression of Resistance
Both Analytical Reactivity and Expression of Resistance Studies were conducted as part of K151688; therefore, a repeat of these studies was not needed to support device performance. A short summary of the results for these studies is provided below.
In K151688, a challenge set composed of 80 mecA MRSA strains and 5 mecC MRSA strains was inoculated onto chromID MRSA agar plates at $10^{3}$ CFU/ml. After 24 hours of incubation, 58/80 mecA MRSA strains and 4/5 mecC MRSA strains were detected on the chromID MRSA agar. In addition, 28 well-characterized Staphylococcus aureus strains (10 low level methicillin-resistant, 10 high level methicillin-resistant, 5 borderline oxacillin-resistant, and 3 methicillin-susceptible) were evaluated with chromID MRSA. All low level and high level methicillin-resistant strains were detected at $\geq 10^{5}$ CFU/ml.
e. Analytical specificity:
Cross-Reactivity
Cross-Reactivity Studies were conducted as part of the anterior nares swab specimen (K091024) and SSSI (K151688) submissions; therefore, an additional Cross-
{6}
Reactivity Study was not needed to support device performance. A short summary of the results of the Cross-Reactivity Study is provided below.
In K091024, 110 isolates were evaluated. Certain ESBL producers with heavy inoculum gave characteristic green color at the point of inoculation after 24 hours of incubation. For K151688, 71 non-MRSA strains representing various bacterial and fungal species were evaluated at 10⁶ CFU/ml. After 24 hours of incubation, green colonies (cross-reactivity) was observed for three Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC) strains, two Staphylococcus sciuri (oxacillin resistant) strains, one Enterobacter cloacae (KPC) strain, and one Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (oxacillin resistant) strain. The Cross-Reactivity Studies were acceptable. A limitation is included in the labeling regarding false positive results with non-MRSA strains.
## Interfering Substances
Although Interference Studies were conducted as part of the anterior nares swab specimen (K091024) and SSSI (K151688) submissions, additional studies were performed to evaluate potential interference from 6 common medical substances in the detection of MRSA with chromID MRSA. Results demonstrated that MRSA strains were recovered in the presence of hemoglobin, triglyceride sera, conjugated and unconjugated bilirubin, γ globulin, and sodium polyanetholsulfonate. A separate blood culture bottle study indicated that MRSA could be recovered from the following blood culture bottles:
- BacT/ALERT—FA (Aerobic), FA Plus (Aerobic), FN (Anaerobic), FN Plus (Anaerobic), SA (Standard Aerobic), SN (Standard Anaerobic)
- BacTEC—Standard Aerobic, Standard Anaerobic, PLUS Aerobic, PLUS Anaerobic, Lytic Anaerobic, Peds PLUS Aerobic
- VersaTREK—REDOX1 (Aerobic) and REDOX2 (Anaerobic)
These study results are acceptable. Substances interfering with MRSA detection on chromID MRSA (from K091024 and K151688) are listed as limitations in the labeling.
## Mixed Infection Study
For results of the Mixed Infection Study, please refer to K151688.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not Applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Not Applicable. Compared to Standard Reference Method.
b. Matrix comparison:
{7}
Not Applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
A clinical study was conducted with positive blood culture specimens (demonstrating Gram-positive cocci) to establish performance of chromID MRSA with the new specimen type. The performance of chromID MRSA agar was evaluated at four clinical sites, and data was collected from 1050 positive blood culture specimens (exhibiting Gram-positive cocci on Gram stain). Of these, 863 samples were included in the final performance calculations for chromID MRSA after the exclusion of 187 samples. Samples were excluded for the following reasons:
- 26 samples due to the limited number of positive pediatric blood culture bottles collected (for MRSA); all pediatric blood culture bottles were excluded from the study
- 139 samples from blood culture bottles not indicated for the BacT/ALERT or BACTEC systems were excluded according to the clinical protocol
- 22 samples due to additional protocol deviations—enrollment errors, duplicate samples, no quality control performed, cultures not saved for confirmation, no biochemical testing performed, and isolates aged greater than 5 days
Results from chromID MRSA at 24 hours incubation were compared to results obtained from traditional subculture on Tryptic Soy Agar with 5% sheep blood (BAP) at 48 hours. Suspected Staphylococcus aureus isolates were identified by gram stain, catalase, and latex agglutination. Susceptibility testing was performed using the cefoxitin screen test (30 µg disk).
chromID MRSA plates were incubated at 35°C for 24 hours in ambient air. Green colonies detected on chromID MRSA plates after 24 hours of incubation indicated the presence of MRSA. Performance (sensitivity and specificity) of chromID MRSA compared to the reference method is presented in Table 2 below. Blood culture bottles from each automated blood culture system were stratified and analyzed separately to determine the performance of chromID MRSA with each bottle type (Table 3).
8
{8}
Table 2. Clinical Performance Data for chromID MRSA vs Reference Method (All Sites)
| ChromID MRSA (24 hrs) | Reference Method | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 215 | 7a | 222 |
| Negative | 0 | 641 | 641 |
| Total | 215 | 648 | 863 |
| Sensitivity: 100% (215/215), 95% CI (98.3%-100%) Specificity: 98.9% (641/648), 95% CI (97.8%-99.5%) | | | |
aSeven discordant specimens were observed (chromID MRSA result of MRSA positive; reference testing result of MRSA negative). Of the seven chromID MRSA positive specimens, two were confirmed as MRSA by gram stain, catalase, latex agglutination, cefoxitin screen test, mecA PCR, and Mass spec ID while five specimens grew green colonies on chromID MRSA that were not MRSA (two E. faecalis, one S. epidermidis, one S. aureus, one No ID).
Table 3. Clinical Performance for chromID MRSA Stratified by Blood Culture Bottle System
| Blood Culture System | Blood Culture Bottle Type | Total # Bottles | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BacT/ALERT | FA (FAN Aerobic) | 46 | 100% (32/32) (89.3% - 100%) | 100% (14/14) (78.5% - 100%) |
| | FA (FAN Plus Aerobic) | 32 | 100% (22/22) (85.1% - 100%) | 100% (10/10) (72.3% - 100%) |
| | FN (FAN Anaerobic) | 36 | 100% (31/31) (89.0% - 100%) | 100% (5/5) (56.6% - 100%) |
| | FN (FAN Plus Anaerobic) | 27 | 100% (20/20) (83.9% - 100%) | 100% (7/7) (64.6% - 100%) |
| | SA (Standard Aerobic) | 187 | 100% (23/23) (85.7 - 100%) | 98.8% (162/164) (95.7 - 99.7%) |
| | SN (Standard Anaerobic) | 121 | 100% (25/25) (86.7% - 100%) | 99.0% (95/96) (94.3% - 99.8%) |
| | SYSTEM (Combined) | 449 | 100% (153/153) (97.6% - 100%) | 99.0% (293/296) (97.1% - 99.7%) |
| | | | | |
| BACTEC | Plus Aerobic/F | 255 | 100% (30/30) (88.7% - 100%) | 98.7% (222/225) (96.2% - 99.6%) |
| | Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F | 159 | 100% (32/32) (89.3% - 100%) | 99.2% (126/127) (95.7% - 99.9%) |
| | SYSTEM (Combined) | 414 | 100% (62/62) (94.2% - 100%) | 98.9% (348/352) (97.1% - 99.6%) |
b. Clinical specificity:
See above
{9}
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not Applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not Applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
MRSA was detected in 24.9% (215/863) of positive blood cultures exhibiting Gram-positive cocci on Gram stain and confirmed to be MRSA by the reference method. With chromID MRSA at 24 hours, MRSA was reported for 25.7% (222/863) of the samples tested.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
10
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.