CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING, CAPILLARYS 3 TERA, IT/IF CONTROL
K161928 · Sebia · CFF · Dec 21, 2016 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K161928
Device Name
CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING, CAPILLARYS 3 TERA, IT/IF CONTROL
Applicant
Sebia
Product Code
CFF · Immunology
Decision Date
Dec 21, 2016
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5510
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING kit is designed for the qualitative detection and the characterization of monoclonal proteins (immunotyping) in human serum with the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument, SEBIA, for capillary electrophoresis. It is used in conjunction with the CAPI 3 PROTEIN(E) 6 kit, SEBIA, designed for proteins separation into 6 major fractions in alkaline buffer (pH 9.9). The CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument performs all procedural sequences automatically to obtain a profile for qualitative analysis. Each serum sample is mixed with individual antisera that are specific against gamma (Ig G), alpha (Ig A) and mu (Ig M) heavy chains, and kappa (free and bound) light chains and lambda (free and bound) light chains, respectively. The proteins, separated in silica capillaries, are directly detected by their absorbance at 200 mm. The electrophoregrams are evaluated visually to detect the presence of specific reactions with the suspect monoclonal proteins. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use.
Device Story
Device performs automated capillary zone electrophoresis to detect/characterize monoclonal proteins in human serum. Input: human serum samples; reagents (antisera against IgG, IgA, IgM, Kappa, Lambda). Process: sample dilution; mixing with specific antisera; injection into 12 parallel silica capillaries; high-voltage electrophoretic separation; detection via 200 nm absorbance. Output: electrophoregrams for visual evaluation by laboratory personnel. Used in clinical laboratories; operated by trained technicians. Output allows clinicians to identify monoclonal components; aids diagnosis/monitoring of plasma cell dyscrasias. Benefits: automated, high-throughput characterization of monoclonal immunoglobulins compared to manual methods.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Method comparison study of 115 serum samples (12 normal, 103 pathological) showed 100% agreement with predicate device. Repeatability and reproducibility studies across 3 instruments and 3 reagent lots showed concordant results. Interference testing confirmed no impact from triglycerides, bilirubin, rheumatoid factor, or hemoglobin at specified concentrations.
Technological Characteristics
Capillary zone electrophoresis in silica capillaries. Energy source: high-voltage electrical field. Detection: 200 nm absorbance (deuterium lamp and LED). Throughput: 12 parallel capillaries. Temperature control: Peltier device. Connectivity: RFID reagent identification. Software: SEBIA PHORESIS. Sterilization: N/A (reagents). Form factor: 90cm x 54cm x 67cm.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection and characterization of monoclonal proteins (immunotyping) in human serum. Used for patients suspected of having monoclonal gammopathies. Prescription use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, and E immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, an E (serum antibodies) in serum. Measurement of these immunoglobulins aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION MEMORANDUM
A. 510(k) Number:
K161928
B. Purpose for Submission:
Modification to previously cleared devices and previously cleared instrument and renamed as CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING using The CAPILLARYS TERA Instrument.
C. Measurand:
Monoclonal Immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM, Kappa, Lambda)
D. Type of Test:
Capillary Zone Electrophoresis
E. Applicant:
SEBIA, INC.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING, CAPILLARYS 3 TERA, IT/IF Control
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 866.5510 Immunoglobulins (A, G, M, D, E) Immunological Test Systems
21 CFR § 866.5550 Immunoglobulin (light chain specific) Immunological Test
21 CFR § 862.1630 Electrophoretic, Protein Fractionation
21 CFR § 862.1660 Quality Control Material (assayed and unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II (test systems)
Class I (control and Electrophoretic, protein fractionation devices)
3. Product codes:
CFF - Immunoelectrophoretic, Immunoglobulins (G, A, M)
DFH – Kappa, Antigen, Antiserum, Control
{1}
DEH – Lambda, Antigen, Antiserum, Control
CEF – Electrophoretic, Protein Fractionation
JJY – Multi-analyte controls, all kinds (assayed)
4. Panel:
Immunology (82)
Clinical Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
CAPI 3 Immunotyping using CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument:
The CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING kit is designed for the qualitative detection and characterization of monoclonal proteins (immunotyping) in human serum with the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument, SEBIA, for capillary electrophoresis. It is used in conjunction with CAPI 3 PROTEIN(E) 6 kit, SEBIA, designed for protein separation into 6 major fractions in alkaline buffer (pH 9.9).
The CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument performs all procedural sequences automatically to obtain a protein profile for qualitative analysis. Each serum sample is mixed with individual antisera that are specific against gamma (Ig G), alpha (Ig A) and mu (Ig M) heavy chains, and kappa (free and bound) light chains and lambda (free and bound) light chains, respectively.
The proteins, separated in silica capillaries, are directly detected by their absorbance at 200 nm. The electrophoregrams are evaluated visually to detect the presence of specific reactions with the suspect monoclonal proteins.
For In Vitro Diagnostic Use.
IT/IF Control:
The IT/IF Control is designed to quality control the qualitative detection and characterization of human monoclonal immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM, Kappa and Lambda) with the electrophoresis methods:
- Immunotyping performed using capillary electrophoresis on SEBIA CAPILLARYS 2, CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING and CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instruments and on SEBIA MINICAP instrument,
- Immunofixation methods: SEBIA HYDRAGEL IF, HYDRAGEL IF Penta, HYDRAGEL BENCE JONES (Standard mask and Dynamic mask) performed using the HYDRASYS and HYDRASYS 2 instruments and the K20 electrophoresis chamber.
The IT/IF Control is designed for laboratory use. It should be used (with its barcode label for CAPILLARYS and MINICAP procedure) like a human serum sample. The electrophoretic pattern obtained is specific for each batch of IT/IF control.
For In Vitro Diagnostic Use.
{2}
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as Intended Use.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
The device is to be used with the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument and the IT/IF Control
The device is for prescription use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
For CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING KIT: CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument
FOR IT/IF CONTROL:
- CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument
- CAPILLARYS 2 and CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING cleared in K130500
- MINICAP System (capillary electrophoresis) cleared in K073002
- HYDRASYS 1 and HYDRASYS 2 (IF) cleared in K960029
- K20 electrophoresis chamber (IF) cleared in K951536
I. Device Description:
CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING:
CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING kit (PN 2600) contains the sample diluent, ELP solution and specific antisera against gamma (IgG), alpha (IgA), mu (IgM) heavy chains, and free and bound Kappa and Lambda light chains.
A sample dilution is prepared and injected at the anodic end of six capillaries. The reference pattern (ELP pattern), which is a complete electrophoretic pattern of the sample's proteins, is obtained by mixing the sample with the ELP solution and injecting it into the first capillary. The antisera patterns are obtained by sample aspiration into the five subsequent capillaries. Separation is performed in a high-voltage electrical field and proteins are detected using absorbance at 200 nm.
The CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING kit is designed for the SEBIA CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument (PN 1246), a complete automated capillary electrophoresis system.
IT/IF Control:
The IT/IF Control is obtained from a pool of human sera complemented with monoclonal immunoglobulins displaying the five specificities IgG, IgA, IgM, and Kappa and Lambda light chains.
The IT/IF Control is supplied in a stabilized lyophilized form.
3
{3}
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device names and 510(k) numbers:
SEBIA CAPILLARYS IMMUNOTYPING, K130500
SEBIA CAPILLARYS 2 and CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING Instruments, K130500
SEBIA IT/IF Control, K130500
2. Comparison with predicate:
CAPILLARYS IMMUNOTYPING:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING | CAPILLARYS IMMUNOTYPING |
| IFE Antisera Specificity | IgG, IgA, IgM heavy chains and Kappa, Lambda light chains | Same |
| IFE Antisera Storage | 2–8°C | Same |
| Buffer pH | pH 9.9 | Same |
| Technology | Serum Capillary Electrophoresis: Capillary Electrophoretic Migration with Immunofixation by Subtraction (Immunotyping) | Same |
| On board stability | Two months | Same |
| Results | Qualitative Interpretation | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING | CAPILLARYS IMMUNOTYPING |
| Intended use/Indication for use | The CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING kit is designed for the qualitative detection and characterization of monoclonal proteins (immunotyping) in human serum with the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument, SEBIA, for capillary electrophoresis. It is used in conjunction with CAPI 3 PROTEIN(E) 6 kit, SEBIA, designed for protein separation into 6 major fractions in alkaline buffer (pH 9.9).
The CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument performs all procedural sequences | The CAPILLARYS IMMUNOTYPING kit is designed for the detection and the characterization of monoclonal proteins (immunotyping) in human urine and serum with the CAPILLARYS, the CAPILLARYS 2 and the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING, SEBIA, for capillary electrophoresis. It is used in conjunction with the CAPILLARYS PROTEIN(E) 6 kit, SEBIA, designed for proteins separation into 6 major fractions in alkaline buffer (pH 9.9).
The CAPILLARYS, CAPILLARYS 2 and the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING perform all procedural |
4
{4}
5
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | CAPI 3
IMMUNOTYPING | CAPILLARYS
IMMUNOTYPING |
| | automatically to obtain a protein profile for qualitative analysis. Each serum sample is mixed with individual antisera that are specific against gamma (IgG), alpha (IgA) and mu (IgM) heavy chains, and kappa (free and bound) light chains and lambda (free and bound) light chains, respectively. The proteins, separated in silica capillaries, are directly detected by their absorbance at 200 nm. The electrophoregrams are evaluated visually to detect the presence of specific reactions with the suspect monoclonal proteins. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use. | sequences automatically to obtain a protein profile for qualitative analysis. Each urine or serum sample is mixed with individual antisera that are specific against gamma (IgG), alpha (IgA) and mu (IgM) heavy chains, and kappa (free and bound) light chains and lambda (free and bound) light chains, respectively. The proteins, separated in silica capillaries, are directly detected by their absorbance at 200 nm. The electrophoregrams are evaluated visually to detect the presence of specific reactions with the suspect monoclonal proteins. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use. |
| Sample type | Serum | Serum and urine |
| Shelf-life stability | 18 months at 2–8°C | Two months at 2–8°C |
| Equipment | Automated CAPILLARYS 3
TERA electrophoresis System | Automated CAPILLARYS 2 or CAPILLARYS 2 Flex-Piercing, electrophoresis System |
| Detection Limit | IgG Lambda: 30.9 mg/dL
IgA Kappa: 13.3 mg/dL
IgM Kappa: 25.0 mg/dL | IgG Kappa: 25.0 mg/dL
IgA Lambda: 50.0 mg/dL
IgM Lambda: 25.0 mg/dL |
CAPILLARYS INSTRUMENT:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | CAPILLARYS 3 TERA | CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING |
| Results | Qualitative Monoclonal Protein Interpretation | Same |
| Temperature control | Peltier device | Same |
| Software for data processing | SEBIA PHORESIS™ software | Same |
| Samples tubes | Uncapped tubes or capped tubes depending on the procedure | Same |
{5}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | CAPILLARYS 3 TERA | CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING |
| Intended Use | The CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument performs all procedural sequences automatically to obtain a protein profile for qualitative analysis. Each serum sample is mixed with individual antisera that are specific against gamma (IgG), alpha (IgA), and mu (IgM) heavy chains, kappa (free and bound) light chains, and lambda (free and bound) light chains, respectively. The proteins, separated in silica capillaries, are directly detected by their absorbance at 200 nm. The electrophoregrams are evaluated visually to detect the presence of specific reactions with the suspect monoclonal proteins. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use. | The CAPILLARYS, CAPILLARYS 2 and the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING perform all procedural sequences automatically to obtain a protein profile for qualitative analysis. Each urine or serum sample is mixed with individual antisera that are specific against gamma (IgG), alpha (IgA), and mu (IgM) heavy chains, kappa (free and bound) light chains, and lambda (free and bound) light chains, respectively. The proteins, separated in silica capillaries, are directly detected by their absorbance at 200 nm. The electrophoregrams are evaluated visually to detect the presence of specific reactions with the suspect monoclonal proteins. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use. |
| Instrument | SEBIA CAPILLARYS 3 TERA, PN 1246 | SEBIA CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument, PN 1227
SEBIA CAPILLARYS 2 instrument, PN 1222 |
| Analysis throughput | 21 analyses in two hours | 16 analyses in two hours |
| Detection system | Deuterium lamp and LED | Deuterium lamp |
| Number of separation units | 12 parallel capillaries | Eight parallel capillaries |
| Reagent identification | Yes (RFID labels on reagent vials) | No |
| Dimensions | L. 90 cm x H. 54 cm x D. 67 cm | L. 95 cm x H. 39 cm x D. 63 cm |
{6}
IT/IF CONTROL:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | IT/IF CONTROL | IT/IF CONTROL |
| Intended Use | The IT/IF Control is designed to quality control the qualitative detection and characterization of human monoclonal immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM, Kappa and Lambda) with the electrophoresis methods:
- Immunotyping performed using capillary electrophoresis on SEBIA CAPILLARYS 2, CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING and CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instruments and on SEBIA MINICAP instrument,
- Immunofixation methods: SEBIA HYDRAGEL IF, HYDRAGEL IF Penta, HYDRAGEL BENCE JONES (Standard mask and Dynamic mask) performed using the HYDRASYS and HYDRASYS 2 instruments and the K20 electrophoresis chamber.
The IT/IF Control is designed for laboratory use. It should be used (with its barcode label for CAPILLARYS and MINICAP procedure) like a human serum sample. The electrophoretic pattern obtained is specific for each batch of IT/IF control.
For In Vitro Diagnostic Use. | Same |
| Results | Qualitative Monoclonal Protein Interpretation | Same |
| Format | One vial (lyophilized; 1.0 mL) | Same |
| Preparation | Reconstitute the lyophilized control with 1.0 mL distilled or deionized water | Same |
| Storage temperature | Before reconstitution, the lyophilized control must be stored between 2–8°C. They are stable until the expiration date indicated on the vial. | Same |
{7}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | IT/IF CONTROL | IT/IF CONTROL |
| Storage stability | Four years at 2–8 °C | Three years at 2–8 °C |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced:
None Provided.
## L. Test Principle:
The CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument electrophoresis system uses the principle of capillary electrophoresis in liquid medium. With this technique, charged molecules are separated by their electrophoretic mobility in an alkaline buffer with a specific pH. Separation also occurs according to the electrolyte pH and electroosmotic flow. The CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument has silica capillaries functioning in parallel allowing 12 simultaneous analyses.
In immunotyping, a sample dilution is prepared and injected at the anodic end of six capillaries. The reference pattern (ELP pattern), which is a complete electrophoretic pattern of the sample's proteins, is obtained by mixing the sample with the ELP solution and injecting it into the first capillary. The antisera patterns are obtained by sample aspiration into the five subsequent capillaries. Previously diluted samples are mixed with specific antisera against gamma (IgG), alpha (IgA), mu (IgM) heavy chains, and free and bound Kappa and Lambda light chains. Protein separation is performed in a high voltage electrical field. The separated proteins are detected using absorbance at 200 nm at the cathodic end of the capillary. After the analysis, the capillaries are immediately washed with a wash solution and filled with buffer which prepares the capillaries for the next analysis.
The immunotyping is performed in four automated steps:
1. Dilution of serum samples with a specific diluent in the pre-dilution well of the reagent cup. This dilution is made according to the sample's immunoglobulin concentration.
2. Mixing diluted serum sample with specific antisera. The antigen-antibody complex is formed rapidly in liquid medium.
3. Injection of the prepared samples with simultaneous aspiration into six capillaries at the anodic end. Protein separation occurs when a high-voltage field is applied to the alkaline buffer. The separated proteins are detected using absorbance at 200 nm at the cathodic end of the capillary
4. Overlay of the ELP pattern on the antisera patterns (IgG, IgA, IgM, Kappa and Lambda light chains) allows the qualitative characterization and result interpretation of suspected monoclonal component.
{8}
M. Performance Characteristics:
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
All results met the manufacturer’s pre-specified acceptance criteria.
Within-run and between-capillary precision:
Six different serum samples (five pathological samples with monoclonal proteins and one normal sample) were qualitatively tested 12 times in two runs using the CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING on 12 capillaries on the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument. One lot of the CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING was used. Each sample was analyzed with each reagent: ELP solution, anti-IgG, anti-IgA, anti-IgM, anti-kappa and anti-lambda antisera. For each tested reagent, all samples gave concordant results within-run and between-capillaries.
Within-run reproducibility of IT/IF Control:
Three IT/IF control lots were run six times within a run and the run was repeated with three different immunotyping antisera lot numbers on the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument. The IT/IF controls were comprised of one monoclonal IgGL, one IgAL, and one IgMK. According to the identified monoclonal protein, concordant and reproducible within-run results were obtained.
Between-run and between-lot reproducibility of CAPILLARYS 3 IMMUNOTYPING and IT/IF Control on three CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument:
Five pathological and one normal serum sample were analyzed three times and repeated in three different runs (with a total of 18 runs) over five working days. The tests were performed with three different CAPILLARYS 3 IMMUNOTYPING kit lot numbers, three different IT/IF Control lots, and three different CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instruments. According to the identified monoclonal protein characterization, concordant and reproducible results were obtained for both pathological and normal serum samples on all lots and instruments.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
No reference standards and methods available. Controls are internally manufactured by the manufacturer from myeloma serum samples with representative IgGK, IgAK, and IgML monoclonal proteins, and are validated by both Immunofixation Gel Electrophoresis and Capillary Electrophoresis methods.
9
{9}
Stability: The manufacturer provided data to support real-time stability of 18 months and on-board stability of two months for the CAPI 3 IT Kit.
# d. Detection limit:
Limit of detection was performed on three pathological samples: IgA Kappa, IgG Lambda and IgM Kappa with concentration levels of $3.40\mathrm{g / L}$ , $3.96\mathrm{g / L}$ and $1.60\mathrm{g / L}$ , respectively. These three samples were serially diluted at 1:2 down to 1:512 dilution for IgG Lambda and IgM Kappa and down to 1:1024 dilution for IgA Kappa to obtain the variable monoclonal component concentration. The testing was performed on both the Capillarys on Capillarys 2 Flex-Piercing predicate device and CAPI 3 IT on CAP 3 TERA new device. The new device met the acceptance criteria and the Limit of detection results using CAPI 3 IT on CAPILLARY 3 TERA are listed below:
| Sample | Type | Dection Limit (mg/L) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | IgA, Kappa | 13.3 |
| 2 | IgG, Lambda | 30.9 |
| 3 | IgM, Kappa | 25.0 |
# e. Analytical specificity:
The Immunotyping interference study was performed by testing two samples (normal and pathological) with the interferents. These were tested using the CAPI 3 IT on CAPILLARY 3 TERA instrument. The interferents tested were: hemoglobin, lipids (cholesterol and triglycerides), bilirubin, and rheumatoid factor. No interference was observed in any sample. The results of testing pathological serum samples representing IgGK, IgGL, IgAK, IgAL, IgMK and one normal serum sample are shown in the table below:
| Immunotyping Interference Study | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Interferents | Number samples | Results |
| Hemoglobin : 0.2 g/dL | Four Pathological: IgA, K (6.4 g/L), IgG, L (7.6 g/L), IgM, K (3.6 g/L), IgM, L (3.4 g/L) and one Normal | No interference |
| Triglycerides: 3.59 g/dL (41 mM) | Three Pathological: IgA, L (7.2 g/L), IgM, K (16.4 g/L), | No interference |
| | and one Normal | |
| Protein: 0.01 g/dL | Four Pathological: IgA, L (10.2 g/L), IgM, K (10.2 g/L), IgM, L (10.2 g/L), and one Normal | No interference |
| Protein: 0.01 g/dL | Two Pathological: IgA, L (10.2 g/L), IgM, K (10.2 g/L), IgM, L (10.2 g/L), and one Normal | No interference |
{10}
| Immunotyping Interference Study | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Interferents | Number samples | Results |
| | IgG, K (17.4 g/L) and one Normal | |
| Bilirubin : 20 mg/dL (342 μM) | Four Pathological: IgG, L (4.8 g/L), IgA, L (1.2 g/L), IgM, K (8.1 g/L), IgM, L (1.8 g/L) and one Normal | No interference |
| Rheumatoid Factor : 981 IU/mL | Four Pathological: IgA, L (7.2 g/L), IgM, K (16.4 g/L), IgG, K (17.4 g/L), IgA, K (57.2 g/L), IgM, L (3.4 g/L) and one Normal | No interference |
Note: The Package Insert Interference and Limitation section states: “A therapeutic monoclonal antibody, such as daratumumab, present in samples from patients with plasma cell discrasia may interfere with the CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING procedure, and cites the literature reference: “Monitoring multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab: teasing out monoclonal antibody interference - Christopher McCudden et. al., Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2016”
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
A total of 115 serum samples (103 pathological and 12 normal) were evaluated using the CAPILLARYS IMMUNOTYPING devices on the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument and the CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING devices on the CAPILLARYS 3 TERA instrument. There was 100% agreement between the two methods. The results are presented in the table below:
{11}
| Sample | N | Percent Agreement Between Devices |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Normal | 12 | 100% |
| IgG Kappa | 37 | 100% |
| IgG Lambda | 27 | 100% |
| IgA Kappa | 6 | 100% |
| IgA Lambda | 4 | 100% |
| IgM Kappa | 14 | 100% |
| IgM Lambda | 4 | 100% |
| 2 IgA, Kappa | 3 | 100% |
| 2 IgM, Kappa | 2 | 100% |
| Kappa free | 1 | 100% |
| 2 Lambda free | 1 | 100% |
| IgG, Kappa / IgG, Lambda (Biclonal) | 2 | 100% |
| 2 IgA, Kappa/ IgG, Kappa (Triclonal) | 1 | 100% |
| IgG, Kappa/ IgA, Kappa/ IgM, Lambda (Triclonal) | 1 | 100% |
| Grand Total | 115 | 100% |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Same as Expected values/Reference range.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Absence of monoclonal immunoglobulins in apparently healthy individuals.
{12}
N. Instrument Name:
SEBIA CAPILLARYS 3 TERA
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Closed tube batch mode with the following automated steps:
a. Bar code reading of sample tubes and sample racks
b. Sample injection from antisera segments
c. Direct detection of monoclonal proteins by Immunotyping
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X ☐ or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
Bar code reader
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Open tubes are placed in the sample racks
5. Calibration:
Not applicable
6. Quality Control:
IT/IF Control analysis
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
The CAPI 3 IMMUNOTYPING test using the CAPILLARYS 3 Tera instrument is a modification of a previously cleared CAPILLARYS IT Kit for CAPILLARYS 2 and CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX PIERCING instruments (K103500) which was for the detection and characterization of monoclonal proteins in serum and urine. The SEBIA CAPILLARYS IMMUNOTYPING Kit and SEBIA IT/IF Control (k130500) was used as a comparative method for detection of the monoclonal proteins.
13
{13}
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports substantial equivalence decision.
14
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.