FORA ADVANCED GD40 and FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro Blood Glucose and ß-Ketone Monitoring Systems
Applicant
Taidoc Technology Corporation
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Nov 10, 2016
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
FORA ADVANCED GD40 Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitoring System is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger, and for the quantitative measurement of β-ketone (beta-hydroxybutyrate) in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger. The FORA ADVANCED GD40 is intended for in vitro diagnostic use and is intended for single-patient use as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of a diabetes control program. The system should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes. FORA ADVANCED GD40 Blood Glucose Test Strips are for use with the FORA ADVANCED GD40 Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Meter to quantitatively measure glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the finger. The FORA ADVANCED GD40 Blood β-Ketone Test Strips are for use with the FORA ADVANCED GD40 Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Meter to quantitatively measure β-ketone in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the finger. β-Ketone Control Solutions are intended for use with FORA ADVANCED GD40 Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitoring System as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood ketone test results. FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitoring System is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger, and from venous, and neonatal whole blood, and for the quantitative measurement of β-ketone (beta-hydroxybutyrate) in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger, and from venous whole blood. The FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro is intended for in vitro diagnostic use and is intended for multiple-patient use in professional healthcare settings as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of a diabetes control program. This system should only be used with single-use, auto-disabling lancing devices. The system should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes. FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro Blood Glucose Test Strips are for use with the FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Meter to quantitatively measure glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips, and from venous and neonatal whole blood. The FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro Blood β-Ketone Test Strips are for use with the FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Meter to quantitatively measure β-ketone in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips and from venous whole blood. β-Ketone Control Solutions are intended for use with FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitoring System as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood ketone test results.
Device Story
System uses electrochemical biosensor technology to measure glucose and β-ketone concentrations in whole blood samples. Input: capillary, venous, or neonatal blood applied to test strips via capillary action. Operation: glucose dehydrogenase (FAD) catalyzes glucose oxidation; β-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase catalyzes β-ketone conversion; resulting electrical current is proportional to analyte concentration. Output: quantitative glucose (mg/dL) or β-ketone (mmol/L) values displayed on meter. GD40 intended for single-patient home use; GD40 pro intended for multiple-patient professional healthcare settings. Healthcare providers use results to monitor diabetes control effectiveness. Benefits include rapid, point-of-care monitoring of glycemic and ketotic status.
Clinical Evidence
Performance evaluated in laboratory and clinical settings by healthcare professionals and lay users. Studies confirm that intended users obtain glucose and beta-ketone results substantially equivalent to current standard methods.
Technological Characteristics
Electrochemical biosensor; enzymatic reaction (Glucose Dehydrogenase/beta-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase); capillary/venous/neonatal whole blood samples; meter-based display; calibrated to plasma glucose equivalents; includes test strips and control solutions.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative measurement of glucose and β-ketone in fresh capillary whole blood (finger), venous, and neonatal whole blood (GD40 pro only). Intended as an aid to monitor diabetes control programs. Contraindicated for diagnosis/screening of diabetes, patients in shock, severe hypotension, hyperglycemic-hyperosmolar state, or critically ill patients.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
Nova Max Plus Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitor System (K091547)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION MEMORANDUM ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K161738
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Submission
C. Measurand:
Glucose in capillary whole blood glucose from fingertip, venous and neonatal β-Ketone in capillary whole blood from fingertip, and venous
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative Amperometric assay (Glucose dehydrogenase (FAD)) and Quantitative Amperometric β-Ketone (beta-hydroxybutyrate)
E. Applicant:
TaiDoc Technology Corporation
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
FORA ADVANCED GD-40 Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitoring System
FORA ADVANCED GD-40 pro Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitoring System
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
862.1345, Glucose Test System
862.1435, Ketones (nonquantitative) test system
862.1660, Quality control material (assayed and unassayed)
{1}
2. Classification:
Class II
Class I (reserved)
3. Product code:
NBW - System, Test, Blood Glucose, Over-the-Counter
LFR - Glucose Dehydrogenase, Glucose
JIN – Nitroprusside, ketones (urinary, non-quant.)
JJX - Single (specified) analyte controls (assayed and unassayed)
4. Panel:
(75) Chemistry
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
FORA ADVANCED GD40 Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitoring System is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger, and for the quantitative measurement of β-ketone (beta-hydroxybutyrate) in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger. The FORA ADVANCED GD40 is intended for in vitro diagnostic use and is intended for single-patient use as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of a diabetes control program. The system should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes.
FORA ADVANCED GD40 Blood Glucose Test Strips are for use with the FORA ADVANCED GD40 Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Meter to quantitatively measure glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the finger. The FORA ADVANCED GD40 Blood β-Ketone Test Strips are for use with the FORA ADVANCED GD40 Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Meter to quantitatively measure β-ketone in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the finger.
β-Ketone Control Solutions are intended for use with FORA ADVANCED GD40 Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitoring System as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood ketone test results.
2
{2}
3
# FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitoring System
System is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger, and from venous, and neonatal whole blood, and for the quantitative measurement of β-ketone (beta-hydroxybutyrate) in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger, and from venous whole blood. The FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro is intended for in vitro diagnostic use and is intended for multiple-patient use in professional healthcare settings as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of a diabetes control program. This system should only be used with single-use, auto-disabling lancing devices. The system should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes.
FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro Blood Glucose Test Strips are for use with the FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Meter to quantitatively measure glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips, and from venous and neonatal whole blood. The FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro Blood β-Ketone Test Strips are for use with the FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Meter to quantitatively measure β-ketone in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips and from venous whole blood.
β-Ketone Control Solutions are intended for use with FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitoring System as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood ketone test results.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For the FORA ADVANCED GD40 Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitoring System:
- For in vitro diagnostic use (for use outside of the body only).
- For single use only.
- For single-patient use only.
- The system should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes.
- This system is not for use in patients with abnormally low blood pressure or those who are in shock.
- This system is not for use in patients in hyperglycemic-hyperosmolar state, with or without ketosis.
- This system should not be used on critically ill patients.
- This system should not be used on patients with impaired peripheral circulation, severe dehydration as a result of diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hyperglycemia, hyperosmolar non-ketotic coma or shock.
- Neonatal Use: These test strips are not for use with neonates.
- Altitude Effects: This device has not been evaluated at altitudes above 10,742 feet above sea level
{3}
For the FORA ADVANCED GD40 pro Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitoring System:
- For in vitro diagnostic use (for use outside of the body only).
- For single use only.
- This system should only be used with single-use, auto-disabling lancing devices.
- The system should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes.
- This system is not for use in patients with abnormally low blood pressure or those who are in shock.
- This system is not for use in patients in hyperglycemic-hyperosmolar state, with or without ketosis.
- This system has not been evaluated on critically ill patients.
- This system should not be used on patients with impaired peripheral circulation, severe dehydration as a result of diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hyperglycemia, hyperosmolar non-ketotic coma or shock.
- Altitude Effects: This device has not been evaluated at altitudes above 10742 feet above sea level
4. Special instrument requirements:
FORA ADVANCED GD-40 Blood Glucose and β-Ketone meter
FORA ADVANCED GD-40 pro Blood Glucose and β-Ketone meter
I. Device Description:
The FORA ADVANCED GD-40 and FORA ADVANCED GD-40 pro Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitoring Systems each consist of a meter, glucose and ketone test strips, and glucose and ketone control solutions (3 levels for glucose and 2 levels for ketone) sold separately.
The FORA Glucose Control Solutions for glucose monitoring were previously cleared in k093724. The β-Ketone Control Solutions are new.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Nova Max Plus Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitor System
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K091547
{4}
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device
FORA ADVANCED GD-40
and GD40 pro Blood Glucose
and β-Ketone Monitoring Systems
k161738 | Predicate Device
Nova Max Plus Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Monitor System
K091547 |
| Intended Use | For the quantitative measurement of glucose and β-ketone in whole blood | same |
| Sample type | Capillary whole blood from the finger, venous and neonatal whole blood | Capillary whole blood from the finger, palm and forearm |
| Glucose measuring range | 20-600 mg/dL single patient
10-600 mg/dL multiple patient | 20-600 mg/dL |
| β-Ketone measuring range | 0.1 – 8.0 mmol/L | same |
| methodology | Glucose dehydrogenase
β-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase | same |
| Sample size | 0.9 uL glucose
1.0 uL ketone | 0.3 uL glucose
0.8 uL ketone |
| Hematocrit range | 20-70% | 25-60% |
| Operating conditions | 10-40°C, 10-85% RH | 14-40°C, 10-90% RH |
| Reaction time | Glu = 5 seconds
β-Ketone = 10 seconds | same
same |
| Data storage | 1000 events | 400 events |
| Similarities and differences of the ketone control solution | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Candidate Device
β-Ketone Control Solutions
k161738 | Predicate Device
Nova Max Plus Ketone Control Solutions k091547 |
| Intended use/Indications for Use | Used to check that the meters and ketone test strips are working together properly and that the test is performing correctly. | Used as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood ketone test results |
{5}
| Matrix | Water, buffer, salts, viscosity modifier, β-hydroxybutyrate, preservatives, dyes | same |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Levels | Levels 1 and 2 | Levels 1, 2, and 3 |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP05-A2, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline-Second Edition
CLSI EP6-A, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline - Second Edition
IEC 60601-1-2, Medical electrical equipment- part 1-2: general requirements for basic safety and essential performance - collateral standard: electromagnetic compatibility - requirements and tests
IEC 62304, Medical device software - software life cycle processes
ISO 14971:2007, Medical Devices - Application of Risk Management to Medical Devices
# L. Test Principle:
Glucose measurement is based on electrochemical biosensor technology using the enzyme glucose dehydrogenase to catalyze the formation of gluconolactone from the oxidation of glucose whereby two electrons are produced. The electrical current resulting from this enzymatic reaction is measured and correlated to glucose concentration by the meter. The magnitude of the current is proportional to the concentration of glucose in the sample. The test strip is calibrated to display the equivalent of plasma glucose values to allow comparison of results with laboratory methods. Using the same technology, $\beta$ -hydroxybutyrate ( $\beta$ -ketone) is converted by $\beta$ -hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase and the magnitude of electrical current resulting from this enzymatic reaction is proportional to the amount of $\beta$ -hydroxybutyrate present in the sample.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
Performance testing was conducted on the FORA ADVANCED GD-40 Blood Glucose and $\beta$ -Ketone Monitoring System only. This is acceptable because the only differences between the FORA ADVANCED GD-40 and FORA ADVANCED GD-40 pro systems are the name and intended use (single-patient vs. multiple-patient use).
{6}
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
# Repeatability
# Glucose
Venous blood was spiked with five different glucose concentrations (30-50, 51-110, 111-150, 151-250, and $251 - 400\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ) and tested on ten FORA ADVANCED GD-40 meters and three lots of test strips. Ten replicates were tested per meter per glucose concentration. The results from all strip lots are summarized below:
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Lot | N | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30-50 | 1 | 100 | 47.6 | 2.10 | 4.41 |
| | 2 | 100 | 47.3 | 2.06 | 4.35 |
| | 3 | 100 | 47.1 | 2.00 | 4.25 |
| 51-110 | 1 | 100 | 92.1 | 2.62 | 2.85 |
| | 2 | 100 | 91.5 | 2.90 | 3.17 |
| | 3 | 100 | 92.8 | 2.80 | 3.02 |
| 111-150 | 1 | 100 | 132.3 | 4.18 | 3.16 |
| | 2 | 100 | 130.4 | 3.92 | 3.00 |
| | 3 | 100 | 133.7 | 4.28 | 3.20 |
| 151-250 | 1 | 100 | 225.9 | 7.10 | 3.15 |
| | 2 | 100 | 224.3 | 6.68 | 2.98 |
| | 3 | 100 | 223.5 | 6.39 | 2.86 |
| 251-400 | 1 | 100 | 386.1 | 12.08 | 3.13 |
| | 2 | 100 | 387.6 | 11.97 | 3.09 |
| | 3 | 100 | 388.3 | 11.49 | 2.96 |
# Ketones
Venous blood was adjusted with three different $\beta$ -ketone concentrations (0.5, 2.5, and $5.0~\mathrm{mmol / L}$ ) and tested on ten FORA ADVANCED GD-40 meters and three lots of test strips. Ten replicates were tested per meter per glucose concentration. The results from all strip lots are summarized below:
| Ketone Level (mmol/L) | Lot | N | Mean (mmol/L) | SD (mmol/L) | CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0.5 | 1 | 100 | 0.49 | 0.057 | 11.63 |
| | 2 | 100 | 0.53 | 0.067 | 12.64 |
| | 3 | 100 | 0.52 | 0.063 | 12.12 |
| 2.5 | 1 | 100 | 2.89 | 0.099 | 3.44 |
| | 2 | 100 | 2.92 | 0.103 | 3.54 |
| | 3 | 100 | 2.95 | 0.108 | 3.66 |
| 5.0 | 1 | 100 | 5.01 | 0.191 | 3.82 |
| | 2 | 100 | 4.98 | 0.181 | 3.64 |
| | 3 | 100 | 5.00 | 0.176 | 3.53 |
{7}
Intermediate Precision:
Glucose
Intermediate Precision was evaluated using three lots of test strips and ten FORA ADVANCED GD-40 meters. Three levels of Glucose control solutions were used. For each level of control, ten replicates were taken each day for ten days, so that 100 individual measurements were generated per control level. The results from all strip lots are summarized below:
| Control Level | Strip Lot | N | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Level 1 (30-50 mg/dL) | 1 | 100 | 48.3 | 2.22 | 4.59 |
| | 2 | 100 | 48.7 | 2.14 | 4.39 |
| | 3 | 100 | 48.5 | 2.16 | 4.45 |
| Level 2 (96-144 mg/dL) | 1 | 100 | 131.5 | 4.48 | 3.40 |
| | 2 | 100 | 130.5 | 4.80 | 3.68 |
| | 3 | 100 | 132.8 | 4.58 | 3.45 |
| Level 3 (280-420 mg/dL) | 1 | 100 | 330.8 | 10.93 | 3.31 |
| | 2 | 100 | 331.3 | 11.47 | 3.46 |
| | 3 | 100 | 332.0 | 11.55 | 3.48 |
Ketones
| Control Level | Strip Lot | N | Mean (mmol/L) | SD (mmol/L) | CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Level 1 | 1 | 100 | 0.586 | 0.057 | 9.71 |
| | 2 | 100 | 0.582 | 0.058 | 9.88 |
| | 3 | 100 | 0.583 | 0.059 | 10.07 |
| Level 2 | 1 | 100 | 2.588 | 0.071 | 2.76 |
| | 2 | 100 | 2.598 | 0.074 | 2.84 |
| | 3 | 100 | 2.591 | 0.071 | 2.75 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity for both analytes was evaluated using three lots of test strips and five FORA ADVANCED GD-40 meters. For glucose, 10 venous whole blood samples were spiked with glucose to the following glucose concentrations: 8, 45, 70, 115, 169, 298, 386, 494, 577 and 699 mg/dL. Each glucose level was analyzed 15 times, with 5 measurements per test strip lot. For ketones, 6 venous samples were supplemented with β-ketone concentrations to the following β-ketone concentrations: <0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 mmol/L. Linear regression analysis for each lot compared to results obtained using YSI for glucose and β-Hydroxybutyrate LiquiColor analyzer for ketones resulted in the following:
{8}
9
## Glucose
Lot 1: $y = 1.006x + 2.406; R2 = 0.998$
Lot 2: $y = 1.0027x - 0.332; R2 = 0.998$
Lot 3: $y = 1.0034x + 0.104; R2 = 0.998$
## Ketone
Lot 1: $y = 0.9865x + 0.0058; R2 = 0.9966$
Lot 2: $y = 0.9925x + 0.0292; R2 = 0.9973$
Lot 3: $y = 0.9998x - 0.0017; R2 = 0.9981$
The results of the study support the sponsor’s claimed glucose measurement range of $20-600\ \mathrm{mg/dL}$ for the GD40 system and $10-600\ \mathrm{mg/dL}$ for the GD40 pro system, and claimed ketone measurement range of $0.1-8.0\ \mathrm{mmol/L}$ for both systems. The meters display ‘Lo’ when samples are below the measuring range and ‘Hi’ when samples are above the measuring range for both glucose and ketones. Validation testing was performed demonstrating that these feature function as intended.
## c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The FORA ADVANCED GD-40 and FORA ADVANCED GD-40 pro systems are traceable to the NIST SRM 917c glucose reference material and to an in-house standard prepared gravimetrically from commercially available materials for the $\beta$-ketone. The method comparison study was performed using the YSI 2300 Glucose analyzer and the $\beta$-Hydroxybutyrate LiquiColor analyzer as the reference methods (see Section M.2.a.)
## Test strip stability:
### Glucose
Open and closed vial stability for the FORA ADVANCED GD-40 and FORA ADVANCED GD-40 pro Blood Glucose Test Strips were assessed in real-time studies. Study protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found acceptable to support the sponsor’s claimed closed vial (shelf life) stability of 21 months, and open vial stability of 6 months when stored under the recommended storage conditions of $36^{\circ}\mathrm{F}$ to $90^{\circ}\mathrm{F}$ $(2-32^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ and relative humidity of $10-85\%$.
### Ketone
Open and closed vial stability for the FORA ADVANCED GD-40 and FORA ADVANCED GD-40 pro Blood $\beta$-Ketone Test Strips were assessed in real-time studies. Study protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found acceptable to support the sponsor’s claimed closed vial (shelf life) stability of 18 months, and open vial stability of 6 months when stored under the recommended storage conditions of $36^{\circ}\mathrm{F}$ to $90^{\circ}\mathrm{F}$ $(2-32^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ and relative humidity of $10-85\%$.
{9}
The FORA ADVANCED GD-40 and FORA ADVANCED GD-40 pro Blood β-Ketone Test Strips are also provided in individual foil packages. The shelf life stability of the foil packaged test strips was assessed in a real-time study. The study protocol and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found acceptable to support the sponsor’s claimed stability of 18 months when stored under the recommended storage conditions of 36°F to 90°F (2-32°C) and relative humidity of 10-85%.
## Control solution stability:
### Glucose
The FORA Glucose Control Solutions were previously cleared (k093724). The stability protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed under k093724 and found to be acceptable to support the claims that the closed control solution vials are stable for 24 months and the open control solution vials are stable for 90 days after opening when stored at the recommended storage conditions of 36°F-86°F (2°C-30°C).
### Ketone
Open and closed vial stability protocols and acceptance criteria for the β-Ketone Control Solutions were reviewed and found to be acceptable to support closed vial stability of 24 months and open vial stability of 3 months when stored at the recommended storage conditions of 2-8°C.
## Value assignment of controls:
### Glucose
The FORA Glucose Control Solutions were previously cleared (k093724) and are identical except in name. The value assignment protocol were reviewed under k093724 and found to be acceptable.
### Ketone
Three targeted concentrations of the β-Ketone Control Solutions are prepared gravimetrically and analyzed using the YSI 2300 STAT Plus. Each level of the control solution is tested 25 times. The mean along with SD and CV are used to establish the ranges for each level which are then provided on the test strip vial label.
### d. Detection limit:
The glucose measuring range is 20-600 mg/dL for the GD40 device and 10-600 mg/dL for the GD40 pro device, and the ketone measuring range is 0.1-8.0 mmol/L for both. These ranges are validated via the linearity study. See section M.1.b.
10
{10}
# e. Analytical specificity:
# Glucose
Interference testing was performed to evaluate exogenous and endogenous substances using venous blood spiked to two glucose levels of 75 and $170\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . The samples were divided into 2 aliquots: control (with no added interferent) and test (with added interferent at a toxic level or 10 times the known therapeutic level). Each sample was measured by the reference method (YSI) and four FORA ADVANCED GD-40 meters. The sponsor defines no significant interference as bias $< \pm 10\%$ for the test compared to control samples. The following table lists the concentrations of each substance at which no significant interference was detected.
| Substance | Highest concentration tested at which no significant interference is observed (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 50 |
| Acyclovir | 3.1 |
| Allopurinol | 5 |
| Amitriptyline | 0.27 |
| Amoxicillin | 12.5 |
| Ampicillin | 5 |
| Aspirin | 60 |
| Atenolol | 10 |
| Bicarbonate | 336 |
| Caffeine | 10 |
| Calcium | 5mM |
| Ceftriaxone | 250 |
| Chloride | 140mM |
| Cholesterol | 500 |
| Cholic acid | 6 |
| Clonidine | 2 |
| Creatinine | 30 |
| Digoxin | 0.16 |
| Diphenhydramine | 1 |
| Enalapril | 0.15 |
| Ephedrine HCl | 50 |
| Erythromycin | 20 |
| Estrone | 0.1 |
| Famotidine | 0.13 |
| Fluoxetine | 0.8 |
| Folic Acid | 13.3 |
| Fructose | 1000 |
| Furosemide | 2 |
{11}
| Substance | Highest concentration tested at which no significant interference is observed (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| Galactose | 1000 |
| Gamma-Globulin | 12000 |
| Gentisic acid | 2 |
| Glyburide | 1.07 |
| Glycerol | 1000 |
| Hemoglobin | 500 |
| Ibuprofen | 55 |
| Icodextrin | 2000 |
| Isomalt | 1000 |
| Lactose | 1000 |
| Lactitol | 1000 |
| Lidocaine | 6 |
| Magnesium | 5mM |
| Maltose | 1000 |
| Metaproterol | 1.81 |
| Metformin HCl | 50 |
| Metoprolol | 0.3 |
| Naproxen | 100 |
| Nifedipine | 0.17 |
| Nortriptyline | 0.15 |
| Penicillin | 12 |
| Phenytoin | 10 |
| Piroxicam | 5 |
| Potassium | 10mM |
| Sodium | 200mM |
| Sorbitol | 1000 |
| Sulfamethoxazole | 120 |
| Sulfate | 5mM |
| Terfenadine | 0.45 |
| Tetracycline | 10 |
| Theophylline | 25 |
| Tolbutamide | 64 |
| Trimethoprim | 12.5 |
| Urea | 600 |
| Vancomycin | 25 |
| Verapamil | 0.45 |
| Vitamin E | 20 |
| Warfarin | 2 |
| Xylitol | 1000 |
12
{12}
The following table lists the concentrations of substances at which interference was greater than $10\%$ .
| Substance | Lowest Concentration above which interference ≥10% is observed (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 6.25 |
| Ascorbic acid | 5 |
| Bilirubin | 20 |
| Dopamine | 1.25 |
| Levo-dopa | 0.7 |
| Mannitol | 0.013 |
| Mannose | 1.15 |
| Methyl-dopa | 0.625 |
| Reduced Glutathione | 30 |
| Pralidoxime Iodide | 5 |
| Tolazamide | 6.25 |
| Triglycerides | 3000 |
| Uric acid | 10 |
| Xylose | 6.25 |
To address potential interference from acetaminophen $\geq 6\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and uric acid $\geq 10\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , the labeling contains the following statements:
Acetaminophen in your blood $>6.25\mathrm{mg / dL}$ might affect the reliability of your blood glucose results. If you are taking Tylenol your glucose results may not be reliable. If you are unsure, then ask your doctor.
If you have a disease or condition that elevates your blood uric acid level $(>10\mathrm{mg / dL})$ , such as gout, your blood glucose results may not be reliable. If you are unsure, then ask your doctor
# Ketone
Interference testing was performed to evaluate exogenous and endogenous substances using venous blood spiked to two $\beta$ -Ketone levels of 1.0 and $3.0~\mathrm{mmol / L}$ . The samples were divided into 2 aliquots: control (with no added interferent) and test (with added interferent at a toxic level or 10 times the known therapeutic level). Each sample was measured by the $\beta$ -Hydroxybuturate LiquiColor analyzer and four FORA ADVANCED GD-40 meters. The sponsor defines no significant interference as bias $< \pm 10\%$ for the test compared to control samples. The following table lists the
{13}
concentrations of each substance at which no significant interference was detected:
| Substance | Highest concentration tested at which no significant interference is observed (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| Acetoacetate | 20.4 |
| Acetone | 69.6 |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 50 |
| Acyclovir | 3.1 |
| Allopurinol | 5 |
| Amitriptyline | 0.27 |
| Amoxicillin | 12.5 |
| Ampicillin | 5 |
| Aspirin | 60 |
| Atenolol | 10 |
| Bicarbonate | 336 |
| Caffeine | 10 |
| Calcium | 5mM |
| Chloride | 140mM |
| Cholic acid | 6 |
| Clonidine | 2 |
| Creatinine | 5 |
| Digoxin | 0.16 |
| Diphenhydramine | 1 |
| Enalapril | 0.15 |
| Ephedrine HCl | 60 |
| Erythromycin | 20 |
| Estrone | 0.1 |
| Famotidine | 0.13 |
| Fluoxetine | 0.8 |
| Fructose | 1000 |
| Furosemide | 2 |
| Gamma-Globulin | 12000 |
| Glyberide | 1.07 |
| Ibuprofen | 55 |
| Isomalt | 1000 |
| Lactose | 1000 |
| Lactitol | 1000 |
| Lidocaine | 6 |
| Magnesium | 5mM |
| Maltitol | 1000 |
| Maltose | 1000 |
| Mannitol | 1000 |
| Metaproterol | 1.81 |
{14}
The following table lists the concentrations of substances at which interference was greater than $10\%$ .
| Substance | Lowest Concentration above which interference ≥10% is observed (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| Ascorbic acid | 4 |
| Captopril | 500 |
| Cholestrol | 500 |
| Dopamine | 0.09 |
| Gentisic acid | 1.8 |
| Levo-dopa | 0.6 |
| N-acetlycysteine | 2.59 |
| Paracetamol | 25 |
| Triglycerides | 1500 |
| Uric acid | 24 |
| Unconjugated bilirubin | 20 |
| Prothrombin | 10 |
| Thrombin | 10 |
| Thrombin | 10 |
| Thrombin | 10 |
| Tetracycline | 10 |
| Tetracycline | 10 |
| Tetracycline | 10 |
| Tetracycline | 10 |
| Tetracyclines | 10 |
| Tetracyclines | 10 |
| Tetracyclines | 10 |
| Tetracyclines | 10 |
| Tetracyclines | 10 |
| Tetracyclines | 10 |
| Tetrahydrochloride | 10 |
| Tetracyclines | 10 |
| Tetracyclines | 10 |
| Tetracyclines | 10 |
| Tetracyclines | 10 |
| Tetracyclines | 10 |
| Tetracyclines | 10 |
{15}
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
## 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
### Glucose
System accuracy for glucose was assessed in a study using six FORA ADVANCED GD-40 meters and three lots of FORA ADVANCED GD-40 Blood Glucose test strips. Results from the meter were compared to results from the YSI analyzer. Capillary samples from the finger and sodium heparinized venous samples from 172 participants were collected. The total glucose concentration range of capillary samples tested was 43 - 512 mg/dL and total glucose concentration range of venous samples was 44-514 mg/dL. To achieve glucose concentrations less than 50 mg/dL, 6 finger and venous samples were allowed to glycolyze. To achieve glucose concentrations greater than 400 mg/dL, 4 finger and venous samples were spiked. Results of the meter measurements relative to YSI are summarized below:
### Capillary-
Glucose concentration <75 mg/dL
| Within ±5 mg/dL | Within ±10 mg/dL | Within ±15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 18/33 (54.5%) | 28/33 (84.8%) | 33/33 (100%) |
Glucose concentration ≥75 mg/dL
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 85/139 (61.2%) | 121/139 (87.1%) | 136/139 (97.8%) | 139/139 (100%) |
### Venous-
Glucose concentration <75 mg/dL
| Within ±5 mg/dL | Within ±10 mg/dL | Within ±15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 32/36 (88.9%) | 36/36 (100.0%) | 36/36 (100%) |
Glucose concentration ≥75 mg/dL
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 105/136 (77.2%) | 129/136 (94.9%) | 136/136 (100%) | 136/136 (100%) |
Linear regression analyses results are summarized below:
capillary $y = 0.9800x - 0.859, R^2 = 0.9863$
venous $y = 0.993x - 1.443, R^2 = 0.9894$
{16}
# Ketone
System Accuracy for $\beta$ -Ketone was assessed in a study using six FORA ADVANCED GD-40 meters and three lots of FORA ADVANCED GD-40 $\beta$ -Ketone test strips. Results from the meter were compared to results from the $\beta$ -Hydroxybutyrate LiquiColor analyzer. Capillary samples from the finger and sodium heparinized venous samples from of 120 participants were collected. The total range of capillary samples tested was $0.11 - 6.77 \mathrm{mmol} / \mathrm{L}$ and total range of venous samples was $0.04 - 5.59 \mathrm{mmol} / \mathrm{L}$ . Results of the meter measurements relative to the comparator method are summarized below:
# Capillary-
Ketone concentration $< 2\mathrm{mmol / L}$
| Within ±3 mmol/L | Within ±5 mmol/L |
| --- | --- |
| 84/89 (94.4%) | 89/89 (100%) |
Ketone concentration $\geq 2\mathrm{mmol / L}$
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% | Within ±25% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 13/31(41.9%) | 26/31(83.9%) | 29/31 (93.5%) | 31/31 (100%) | 31/31 (100%) |
Venous-
Ketone concentration $< 2\mathrm{mmol / L}$
| Within ±3 mmol/L | Within ±5 mmol/L |
| --- | --- |
| 87/89 (97.8%) | 89/89 (100%) |
Ketone concentration $\geq 2\mathrm{mmol / L}$
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% | Within ±25% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 15/31(48.4%) | 27/31 (87.1%) | 31/31 (100%) | 31/31(100%) | 31/31 (100%) |
Results of the linear regression analyses are as follows:
capillary $y = 0.975x - 0.0283, R^2 = 0.9758$
venous $y = 0.988x - 0.0187, R^2 = 0.9833$
# Neonatal Capillary heelstick
To assess the glucose performance of the FORA ADVANCED GD-40 system with neonatal capillary heelstick, the sponsor performed a study with a total of 364 neonates under 28 days old. 199 capillary heelstick samples were obtained. The samples ranged from $19.6 - 121\mathrm{mg / dL}$ as measured by YSI. The results are summarized in the tables below:
{17}
# Capillary Heelstick
Glucose concentration $< 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| Within ±5 mg/dL | Within ±10 mg/dL | Within ±15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 57/116 (49.1%) | 102/116 (87.9%) | 115/116 (99.1%) |
Glucose concentration $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 42/83 (50.6%) | 68/83 (81.9%) | 81/83 (97.6%) | 83/83 (100%) |
Results of the linear regression analyses are as follows:
Capillary $y = 0.9154x + 7.413, R^2 = 0.9613$
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
# 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
# Glucose
To assess the glucose performance of the FORA ADVANCED GD-40 system in the hands of the intended users the sponsor performed a study with 160 diabetic lay user participants. Participants obtained and tested their own fingerstick samples with the FORA ADVANCED GD-40 system. Blood glucose results from the GD-40 meter obtained by the lay user were compared to the YSI reference value. The samples ranged from 49 to $520\mathrm{mg / dL}$ as measured by YSI. The results are summarized in the tables below:
Glucose concentration $< 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| Within ±5 mg/dL | Within ±10 mg/dL | Within ±15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22/33 (66.7%) | 32/33 (97%) | 33/33 (100%) |
{18}
Glucose concentration $\geq 75\ \mathrm{mg/dL}$
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 100/127 (78.7%) | 122/127 (96.1%) | 125/127 (98.4%) | 127/127 (100%) |
Results of the linear regression analysis:
$$
y = 0.9683x + 6.057, \ R^2 = 0.975
$$
## Ketone
To assess the ketone performance of the FORA ADVANCED GD-40 system in the hands of the intended users the sponsor performed a study with 120 lay user participants. Participants obtained and tested their own fingerstick samples with the FORA ADVANCED GD-40 system. $\beta$-Ketone results from the GD-40 meter obtained by the lay user were compared to the $\beta$-Hydroxybutyrate LiquiColor analyzer. The samples ranged from 0.04 to $6.77\ \mathrm{mmol/L}$. Results of the meter measurements relative to the comparator method are summarized below:
Ketone concentration $< 2\ \mathrm{mmol/L}$
| Within ±3 mmol/L | Within ±5 mmol/L |
| --- | --- |
| 80/89 (89.9%) | 89/89 (100%) |
Ketone concentration $\geq 2\ \mathrm{mmol/L}$
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% | Within ±25% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 15/31 (48.4%) | 25/31 (80.6%) | 30/31 (96.8%) | 30/31 (96.8%) | 31/31 (100%) |
Results of the linear regression analysis:
$$
y = 1.019x - 0.043, \ R^2 = 0.979
$$
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The fasting adult blood glucose range for a person without diabetes¹:
- Before meals $< 100\ \mathrm{mg/dL}$ (5.6 mmol/L)
- After meals: $< 140\ \mathrm{mg/dL}$ (7.8 mmol/L)
¹American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care in diabetes (2016). Diabetes Care, Vol 39, Supplement 1, S16.
{19}
20
N. Instrument Name:
FORA ADVANCED GD-40 Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Meter
FORA ADVANCED GD-40 pro Blood Glucose and β-Ketone Meter
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device?
Yes ☐ x ☐ or No ☐
Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?
Yes ☐ x ☐ or No ☐
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ x ☐ or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
The device is intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the finger, venous whole blood, and neonatal capillary heelstick and venous whole blood. The whole blood sample is applied directly to the test strip by capillary action therefore there are no special handling or storage issues.
5. Calibration:
Coding is necessary for β-Ketone, but not for glucose. A code strip is provided and the user is instructed to calibrate every time a new vial of ketone test strips is begun.
6. Quality Control:
The sponsor provides 3 levels of FORA Glucose Control Solutions and 2 levels of β-
{20}
Ketone Control Solutions, all sold separately. The outer kit box labels state that controls are necessary but not included and must be purchased separately.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
1. Altitude study: An altitude study was performed in a glove box to simulate 3 different altitudes (0, 5000 and 15000 feet). Venous whole blood was spiked to achieve seven glucose concentrations (65, 110, 185, 275, 380, 465, and 580 mg/dL) and five ketone levels (0.2, 1.0, 3.0, 6.0, and 8.0 mmol/L). Each sample was tested with 4 meters and the glucose results were compared to YSI and the ketone results to β-Hydroxybutyrate LiquiColor. The results demonstrate acceptable bias to support the claims that altitudes up to 10,742 feet have no significant effect on blood glucose or ketone measurements with these systems.
2. Hematocrit study: The effect of different hematocrit levels were evaluated using venous whole blood samples with hematocrit levels of 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, and 75%. Five samples were spiked to glucose concentrations of 57, 125, 236, 389, and 565 mg/dL, as measured by YSI, and four samples were spiked to β-ketone levels of 1.0, 2.8, 4.7 and 7.0 mmol/L, as measured by the β-Hydroxybutyrate LiquiColor method. The samples were tested with 6 meters and the results were compared to YSI and the normal 40% hematocrit. The % biases relative to YSI were acceptable within the claimed hematocrit range and support the claimed hematocrit range of 20 to 60%.
The sponsor conducted an additional hematocrit evaluation with 22 neonate capillary blood samples with glucose concentrations ranging from 10-50 mg/dL and hematocrit levels from 50 - 65%. The data demonstrates no affect from high hematocrit levels at low glucose concentrations, as is expected to occur in the neonatal population. The data supports the claimed hematocrit range from 20-60%.
3. Infection control studies: The FORA ADVANCED GD-40 meter is intended for single-patient use, and the FORA ADVANCED GD-40 pro meter is intended for multiple-patient use. Disinfection efficacy studies were performed on the materials comprising the meters by an outside commercial laboratory service to demonstrate complete inactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) with Micro-Kill Wipes (EPA Reg. No. 59894-10-37549). Robustness studies were performed by the sponsor demonstrating that there was no change in performance or in external materials of the meters after 10,950 cleaning and disinfection cycles with Micro-Kill Wipes. The robustness studies were designed to simulate 3 years of multiple-patient use and 5 years of single-patient use. Labeling was reviewed for adequate instructions for the validated cleaning and disinfection procedures.
4. Sample volume study: A sample volume study was performed using venous whole blood samples. Three samples were spiked to glucose concentrations of 39 mg/dL, 133 mg/dL and 325 mg/dL, as measured by YSI, to evaluate the effect of different sample volumes (0.7 μL, 0.8 μL, 0.9 μL, 1.0 μL, 1.1 μL, and 1.2 μL) on the glucose
21
{21}
performance of the device. Three samples were spiked to β-Ketone levels of 0.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol/L, as measured by the β-Hydroxybutyrate LiquiColor method, to evaluate the effect of different sample volumes (0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 mmol/L) on the β-Ketone performance of the device. Three lots of test strips and 5 meters were used. Results from these studies support the claimed minimum sample volume of 0.9 μL for glucose and 1.0 μL for β-Ketone. The meter displays an error message (E-F) for both analytes when an insufficient amount of blood sample is applied. The sponsor provided adequate validation for this error message.
5. Operating Temperature and Humidity: Operating temperature and humidity conditions were evaluated using four meters and three lots of glucose and ketone test strips with venous whole blood samples at three glucose concentrations (70 mg/dL, 125 mg/dL, and 320 mg/dL by YSI) and three β-Ketone levels (0.5, 2.0, and 4.0 mmol/L). The following temperature and humidity conditions were tested: 50°F (10°C)/10% RH, 50°F (10°C)/85% RH, 104°F (40°C)/10% RH, and 104°F (40°C)/85% RH. The results support the sponsor’s claimed operating temperature from 50°F to 104°F (10°C - 40°C) and relative humidity range from 10-85%.
6. EMC testing and Electrical Safety Studies: The sponsor provided documentation certifying that acceptable electromagnetic testing (EMC) had been performed and the System was found compliant.
7. Software documentation: The software documentation was reviewed and found to be acceptable. The firm provided documentation to support the device was designed, developed and is under good software lifecycle processes.
8. Readability Assessment: A Flesch-Kinkaid reading level assessment was conducted demonstrating that the user manual, test strip inserts, and control inserts were written at or below an 8th grade reading level.
This device was cleared after the FDA issued final guidance documents for prescription use blood glucose monitoring systems (BGMS) and over-the-counter use blood glucose monitoring systems (SMBG). However, the recommendations in the guidance documents were not followed for this device since the submission was received prior to the finalization of the guidance documents.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.