CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, Influenza A Subtyping Kit
K161556 · Centers For Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) · OZE · Jun 30, 2016 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K161556
Device Name
CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, Influenza A Subtyping Kit
Applicant
Centers For Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Product Code
OZE · Microbiology
Decision Date
Jun 30, 2016
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3980
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K161556 · Jun 30, 2016
CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, Influenza A Subtyping Kit
Centers For Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Archived clinical specimens from past influenza seasons (2011-2016)
Archived clinical specimens were used to validate the performance of the modified Influenza A Subtyping Kit (VER2) by comparing results against the cleared predicate device or genetic sequence analysis.
Retrospective Clinical Study; Retrospective analysis of archived clinical specimens; Study Period: 2011-2016
Patients with respiratory infection symptoms from influenza seasons 2011-2012, 2013-2014, and 2015-2016; Sample Size: Approximately 100+ specimens (42 A(H1)pdm09 positive, 32 A(H3) positive, and additional negative specimens)
Cleared predicate device or genetic sequence analysis
Positive and negative percent agreement
Indications for Use
The Influenza A Subtyping Kit contains reagents and controls of the CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel and is intended for use in real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) assays on an Applied Biosystems (ABI) 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR instrument in conjunction with clinical and epidemiological information: · For determination of the subtype of seasonal human influenza A viruses as seasonal A(H3), and/or A(H1)pdm09 from viral RNA in upper respiratory tract clinical specimens (including nasopharyngeal swabs [NPS], nasal swabs [NS], throat swabs [TS], nasal aspirates [NA], nasal washes [NW] and dual nasopharyngeal/throat swabs [NPS/TS]) and lower respiratory tract specimens (including bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL], bronchial wash [BW], tracheal aspirate [TA], sputum, and lung tissue) from human patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection and/or from viral culture; · To provide epidemiologic information for surveillance of circulating influenza viruses.
Device Story
The CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, Influenza A Subtyping Kit (VER 2) is an in vitro diagnostic assay for the qualitative detection and characterization of influenza A virus RNA. It utilizes real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) on the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR instrument. The kit includes oligonucleotide primers and fluorescently labeled hydrolysis probes targeting conserved regions of the influenza A matrix (M) gene, nucleoprotein (NP) gene, and HA genes for A(H3) and A(H1)pdm09 subtyping. It also detects human RNase P as an internal control. The device is used in clinical and public health laboratories by trained personnel. Results are interpreted in conjunction with clinical and epidemiological data to aid in influenza surveillance and patient management. The updated version incorporates modified primers and probes for the pdmH1 assay to improve reactivity with the 6B.1 genetic clade and utilizes ZEN double-quenched probe technology. The H1 assay has been removed as it is no longer clinically necessary.
Clinical Evidence
Retrospective study using archived clinical specimens (2011-2016). Evaluated 42 specimens positive for A(H1)pdm09 (including those with aberrant results in previous assay) and 32 specimens positive for A(H3). Compared modified assays against predicate/sequence analysis. Results showed high positive percent agreement (97.1-100% for A(H1)pdm09; 100% for A(H3)) and 100% negative percent agreement across tested specimen types (NPS, NS, NW, TS, BW, NA).
Technological Characteristics
The device uses rRT-PCR technology with oligonucleotide primers and fluorescent hydrolysis probes (ZEN double-quenched or BHQ-1). It targets influenza A matrix, nucleoprotein, and HA genes. It is designed for use on the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR instrument. It requires RNA extraction using cleared methods (e.g., QIAamp DSP Viral RNA Mini Kit, MagNA Pure, NucliSENS easyMAG) and specific enzyme master mixes (Invitrogen SuperScript III or Quanta qScript).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection to determine the subtype of seasonal influenza A viruses (A(H3) and/or A(H1)pdm09) from respiratory specimens. Not for use as the sole basis for treatment or patient management. Requires training by CDC instructors.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A respiratory viral panel multiplex nucleic acid assay is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic device intended to simultaneously detect and identify multiple viral nucleic acids extracted from human respiratory specimens or viral culture. The detection and identification of a specific viral nucleic acid from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of respiratory infection aids in the diagnosis of respiratory viral infection when used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings. The device is intended for detection and identification of a combination of the following viruses:(1) Influenza A and Influenza B; (2) Influenza A subtype H1 and Influenza A subtype H3; (3) Respiratory Syncytial Virus subtype A and Respiratory Syncytial Virus subtype B; (4) Parainfluenza 1, Parainfluenza 2, and Parainfluenza 3 virus; (5) Human Metapneumovirus; (6) Rhinovirus; and (7) Adenovirus.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls are:(1) FDA's guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Respiratory Viral Panel Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assay;”
(2) For a device that detects and identifies Human Metapneumovirus, FDA's guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Testing for Human Metapneumovirus (hMPV) Using Nucleic Acid Assays;” and
(3) For a device that detects and differentiates Influenza A subtype H1 and subtype H3, FDA's guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Testing for Detection and Differentiation of Influenza A Virus Subtypes Using Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assays.” See § 866.1(e) for the availability of these guidance documents.
Predicate Devices
CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, Influenza A Subtyping Kit (K140851)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
SPECIAL 510(k): Device Modification OIR Decision Summary
To: THE FILE
RE: K161556
This 510(k) submission contains information/data on modifications made to the SUBMITTER'S own Class II device requiring 510(k). The following items are present and acceptable:
1. The name and 510(k) number of the SUBMITTER'S previously cleared device.
Trade Name: CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, Influenza A Subtyping Kit
510(k) Number: k140851
2. Submitter's statement that the INDICATION/INTENDED USE of the modified device, called "CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, Influenza A Subtyping Kit VER2", as described in its labeling HAS NOT CHANGED along with the proposed labeling which includes instructions for use, and package labeling.
Submitter states in the labeling, 510(k) Summary, and in the submission that the intended use of the modified device has not changed from its predicate.
3. A description of the device MODIFICATIONS, including clearly labeled diagrams and assay instructions in sufficient detail to demonstrate that the FUNDAMENTAL SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGY of the modified device has not changed.
The modifications presented in this special 510k include:
a) Redesign of the reverse primer and probe sequences for A/pdmH1N1 assay to better detect currently circulating influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses belonging to the 6B.1 genetic clade;
b) Evaluation of ZEN™ Double-Quenched probes (InfA-P, H3-P, pdmInfA-P, pdmH1-P, and RP-P) as an alternate option to the currently cleared BHQ probes;
c) Elimination of the influenza A/H1 primers/probe (H1-F, H1-R, H1-P) set of reagents because this influenza virus is no longer circulating and the assay for its detection is unnecessary;
d) Elimination of references and instructions for A/H1 from the IFU statement, package labels, software, and labeling;
e) Replace positive control PIPC (inactive A/H1, A/H3, A/H1pdm09, B) with SPIC (inactive A/H3, A/H1pdm09, B);
f) Updating nomenclature of influenza A virus subtypes to align with WHO nomenclature. Designations A/H1, A/H3 and A/H1pdm updated to A(H1N1), A(H3N2) and A(H1N1)pdm09;
g) Updates to the device labeling:
- Addition of study results demonstrating the performance of modified assays (modified primers and probes);
- Replacing LoD data for influenza A/(H3/N2) strains A/New York/55/2004 and A/Wisconsin/67/2005 with data for A/Perth/16/2009 and A/Victoria/361/2011 strains;
{1}
Page 2 of 10
- Addition of reactivity data with potential pandemic influenza A swine H1N1v viruses A/Texas/14/2008, A/Ohio/09/2015, and A/Minnesota/19/2011;
- Strains A/Maryland/12/1991 and A/Swine/Wisconsin/125/1997 were removed from the reactivity table as per sponsor indication that they no longer circulate;
4. Comparison Information (similarities and differences) to applicant's legally marketed predicate device including, labeling, intended use, physical characteristics, and software is shown in the table below.
| Element | Predicate: CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel Diagnostic Panel, Influenza A Subtyping Kit (K140851) | Modified Device: CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel Diagnostic Panel, Influenza A Subtyping Kit (VER 2) (K161556) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use | The Influenza A Subtyping Kit contains reagents and controls of the CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel and is intended for use in real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) assays on an Applied Biosystems (ABI) 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR instrument in conjunction with clinical and epidemiological information: For determination of the subtype of seasonal human influenza A viruses as seasonal A/H1, A/H3, and/or A/H1pdm09 from viral RNA in upper respiratory tract clinical specimens (including nasopharyngeal swabs [NPS], nasal swabs [NS], throat swabs [TS], nasal aspirates [NA], nasal washes [NW] and dual nasopharyngeal/throat swabs [NPS/TS]) and lower respiratory tract specimens (including bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL], bronchial wash [BW], tracheal aspirate [TA], sputum, and lung tissue) from human patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection and/or from viral culture; To provide epidemiologic information for surveillance of circulating influenza viruses. Performance characteristics for influenza were established during a season when seasonal influenza viruses A/H1 and A/H3 were the predominant influenza A viruses in | The Influenza A Subtyping Kit contains reagents and controls of the CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel and is intended for use in real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) assays on an Applied Biosystems (ABI) 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR instrument in conjunction with clinical and epidemiological information: For determination of the subtype of seasonal human influenza A viruses as seasonal A(H3), and/or A(H1)pdm09 from viral RNA in upper respiratory tract clinical specimens (including nasopharyngeal swabs [NPS], nasal swabs [NS], throat swabs [TS], nasal aspirates [NA], nasal washes [NW] and dual nasopharyngeal/throat swabs [NPS/TS]) and lower respiratory tract specimens (including bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL], bronchial wash [BW], tracheal aspirate [TA], sputum, and lung tissue) from human patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection and/or from viral culture; To provide epidemiologic information for surveillance of circulating influenza viruses. Performance characteristics for influenza were established during a season when seasonal influenza viruses A(H1N1) and A(H3N2) were the predominant influenza A viruses in circulation and during a season when |
| | in the same region of the human influenza virus A/H1 and A/H3 and the same region of the human influenza virus A/H1pdm09 from viral RNA in the same region of the human influenza virus A/H1 and A/H3 and the same region of the human influenza virus A/H1 and A/H3 and the same region of the human influenza virus A/H1 and A/H3 and the same region of the human influenza virus A/H1 and A/H3 and the same region of the human influenza virus A/H1 and | in the same region of the human influenza virus A/H1 and A/H3 and the same region of the human influenza virus A/H1 and A/H3 and the same region of the human influenza virus A/H1 and A/H3 and the same region of the human influenza virus A/H1 and the same region of the human influenza virus A/H1 and the same region of the human influenza virus A/H1 and the same |
{2}
Page 3 of 10
| Element | Predicate: CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT- PCR Diagnostic Panel Diagnostic Panel, Influenza A Subtyping Kit (K140851) | Modified Device: CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT- PCR Diagnostic Panel Diagnostic Panel, Influenza A Subtyping Kit (VER 2) (K161556) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | circulation and during a season when the A/H1pdm09 influenza virus was the predominant influenza A virus in circulation. Performance characteristics may vary with other emerging influenza A viruses.
Negative results do not preclude influenza virus infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or other patient management decisions. Conversely, positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.
If infection with a novel influenza A virus is suspected based on current clinical and epidemiological screening criteria recommended by public health authorities, specimens should be collected with appropriate infection control precautions for novel virulent influenza viruses and sent to state or local health department for testing. Viral culture should not be attempted unless a BSL 3+ facility is available to receive and culture specimens.
Text box in IFU:
All users, analysts, and any person reporting results from use of this device should be trained to perform and interpret the results from this procedure by a competent instructor prior to use. CDC Influenza Division will limit the distribution of this device to only those users who have successfully completed a training course provided by CDC instructors or designees. | the A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza virus was the predominant influenza A virus in circulation. Performance characteristics may vary with other emerging influenza A viruses.
Negative results do not preclude influenza virus infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or other patient management decisions. Conversely, positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.
If infection with a novel influenza A virus is suspected based on current clinical and epidemiological screening criteria recommended by public health authorities, specimens should be collected with appropriate infection control precautions for novel virulent influenza viruses and sent to state or local health department for testing. Viral culture should not be attempted unless a BSL 3E facility is available to receive and culture specimens.
Text box in IFU:
All users, analysts, and any person reporting results from use of this device should be trained to perform and interpret the results from this procedure by a competent instructor prior to use. CDC Influenza Division will limit the distribution of this device to only those users who have successfully completed a training course provided by CDC instructors or designees. |
| Organism Detected | Universal influenza A viruses (animal and human), Swine-origin influenza A viruses, Influenza A subtypes: seasonal A(H1), A(H3), A(H1)pdm09 | Universal influenza A viruses (animal and human), Swine-origin influenza A viruses, Influenza A subtypes: seasonal A(H3) and A(H1)pdm09 |
| Specimen Types | Nasopharyngeal swabs, nasal swabs, throat swabs, nasal aspirates, nasal | Same |
3
{3}
Page 4 of 10
| Element | Predicate: CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT- PCR Diagnostic Panel Diagnostic Panel, Influenza A Subtyping Kit (K140851) | Modified Device: CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT- PCR Diagnostic Panel Diagnostic Panel, Influenza A Subtyping Kit (VER 2) (K161556) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | washes and dual nasopharyngeal/throat swabs, bronchoalveolar lavages, bronchial aspirates, bronchial washes, tracheal aspirates, sputum, and lung tissue. | |
| Nucleic Acid Extraction | Yes | Same |
| Extraction Method | • QIAamp® DSP Viral RNA Mini Kit, Qiagen
• MagNA Pure Compact –Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit I, Roche
• MagNA Pure Compact – RNA Isolation Kit, Roche
• MagNA Pure LC – Total Nucleic Acid Kit, Roche
• Qiagen QIAcube – QIAamp® DSP Viral RNA Mini Kit, Qiagen
• NucliSENS® easyMAG®, bioMerieux | Same |
| Enzyme Master Mix | Invitrogen SuperScript™ III Platinum® One-Step Quantitative RT-PCR Kit (with or without ROX)
OR
Quanta BioSciences qScript™ One-Step qRT-PCR Kit, Low ROX | Same |
| Technological Principles | Real-time RT-PCR | Same |
| Instrumentation | Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument with SDS software version 1.4 | Same |
| Probe Quenching Molecule | Black Hole Quencher Probe (BHQ-1) | ZEN Double-Quenched Probe (InfA, H3, pdmInfA, pdmH1, and RP assays)
OR Black Hole Quencher Probe (InfA, H3, pdmInfA, pdmH1, and RP assays) |
| Oligonucleotides | H1 Assay-Targets a region of the HA gene
H3 assay-Targets a region of the HA gene pdmH1 assay-Targets a region of the HA gene
InfA assay-Targets a conserved region of the matrix gene in Influenza A viruses | Gene targets of the oligonucleotide assays are the same as the predicate; minor changes to the pdmH1 oligonucleotide sequences have been made; the H1 assay is not included in this version of the Influenza A Subtyping Kit |
4
{4}
Page 5 of 10
| Element | Predicate: CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT- PCR Diagnostic Panel Diagnostic Panel, Influenza A Subtyping Kit (K140851) | Modified Device: CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT- PCR Diagnostic Panel Diagnostic Panel, Influenza A Subtyping Kit (VER 2) (K161556) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | pdmInfA-Targets a conserved region of the nucleoprotein gene in Influenza A(H1N1) pdm09 viruses | |
5. A Design Control Activities Summary was present which includes:
a) Identification of Risk Analysis method used to assess the impact of the modification on the device and its components, and the results of the analysis
The risk analysis for the CDC Influenza A Subtyping Kit was conducted to verify that the device modifications do not present increased or new risks to the user. The following potential risk factors were identified: 1) the modified oligonucleotides may demonstrate variable reactivity among virus strains, and 2) that labeling changes may result in testing errors leading to inaccurate or delayed assay results. Mitigations for risk #1 included analytical reactivity verification testing. For risk #2, the proposed mitigations are to distribute to the end users an updated labeling (package insert) for the Influenza A Subtyping Kit and a Product Update Communication explaining the modifications and communicating the availability of the updated Influenza A Subtyping Kit. Proposed mitigations should bring the identified hazards to an acceptable level.
b) Based on the Risk Analysis, an identification of the verification activities required, including tests used and acceptance criteria to be applied.
## Verification of Performance
The following studies were conducted to mitigate the risk of variable reactivity of the modified primers and probes:
## Analytical sensitivity
A study was conducted to compare the approximate Limit of Detection (LoD; range finding study, n=3 per each analyte concentration) between cleared and modified RT-PCR reaction mixtures. The viruses tested were the historic virus A/California/07/2009 and the recent virus A/West Virginia/01/2016. The latter strain includes the point mutations that cause aberrant results with the current cleared A(H1)pdm09 assay. Characterized viruses of a known 50% infectious dose titer (EID50/mL or TCID50/mL) were extracted, and the RNA was serially diluted and tested in order to determine an estimated LoD (the lowest concentration where 3 of 3 replicates are detected). These studies were conducted with two RT-PCR enzyme systems cleared for use with the CDC Influenza A Sybtyping Kit (Invitrogen Superscript and Quanta qscript).
The results of the range-finding LoD study indicate equivalent reactivity between the cleared and modified reaction mixtures for the historic virus A/California/07/2009. The results for A/West
5
{5}
Page 6 of 10
Virginia/01/2016 confirm that the modified A(H1)pdm09 assay detects the virus bearing the point mutation that was not detected by the current A(H1)pdm09 assay.
The estimated LoD was confirmed by testing extraction replicates (n=20) of the highest virus dilution (of the range-finding study) where greater than or equal to 95% of replicates tested positive. These studies were conducted with two RT-PCR enzyme systems cleared for use with the CDC Influenza A Sybtyping Kit (Invitrogen Superscript and Quanta qscript). The following lowest concentration where the InfA, pdmInfA, and pdmH1 primer and probe sets demonstrate uniform detection was reported as the LOD.
| Influenza Virus Tested | Influenza Strain Designation | LoD (ID50/mL) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Invitrogen SuperScript | Quanta qScript |
| A(H1)pdm09 | A/West Virginia/01/2016 | 10^{0.9} | 10^{0.9} |
| | A/California/07/2009 | 10^{3.1} | 10^{3.8} |
A comparison study was conducted to demonstrate LOD equivalency for the A/H3 assays between the currently cleared BHQ probe and the ZEN probe. The RNA was extracted from A/Hong Kong/4801/2014 virus, was serially deluted, and three replicates per dilution were tested. The results indicate similar analytical sensitivity between the assays with ZEN and BHQ-1 probes.
## Inclusivity
An inclusivity study was conducted to demonstrate the capability of the modified primer/probe RT-PCR mixtures (InfA, pdmInfA and pdmH1 with ZEN probes) to detect influenza A(H1)pdm09 viruses representative of different geographic locations and phylogenetic clades. Inclusivity testing was performed with ten representative H1pdm09 viruses at or near the established LoD. The viruses were grown to high titer, harvested, and serially diluted to near the LoD of the assays. The diluted viruses were extracted and tested (n=3 replicates) to demonstrate reactivity.
The Influenza A Subtyping Kit was reactive with all H1pdm09 isolates tested. The inclusivity results are presented in the table below.
| Influenza Virus Strain A(H1N1)pdm09 Identification | ID50/mL |
| --- | --- |
| A/California/04/2009 | 10^{2.9} |
| A/California/07/2009 | 10^{3.5} |
| A/Colorado/14/2012 | 10^{1.1} |
| A/Florida/27/2011 | 10^{1.9} |
{6}
Page 7 of 10
| A/Florida/62/2014 | 10^{2.2} |
| --- | --- |
| A/Maryland/13/2012 | 10^{1.0} |
| A/Minnesota/03/2011 | 10^{3.9} |
| A/North Carolina/4/2014 | 10^{3.3} |
| A/Utah/13/2016 | 10^{1.5} |
| A/Washington/24/2012 | 10^{2.5} |
## Analytical Specificity
Analytical specificity was evaluated by testing influenza A(H1) virus strains representing diverse geographic locations. Samples were tested in triplicate using RNA extracted from high titer preparations of viruses (≥ 10⁶ ID50/mL). Cross-reactivity testing was conducted with two enzyme systems (Invitrogen Superscript and Quanta qscript) and one extraction method cleared for use with the Influenza A Subtyping Kit. The results are presented in the table below.
| Strain Designation Subtype | ID50/mL | SuperScript | | | qScript | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | InfA | pdm InfA | pdm H1 | InfA | pdm InfA | pdm H1 |
| A/Brisbane/59/07 A(H1N1) | 10^{8.4} | (+) 3/3 | - | - | (+) 3/3 | - | - |
| A/Hawaii/15/2001 A(H1N1) | 10^{8.1} | (+) 3/3 | - | - | (+) 3/3 | - | - |
| A/Iowa/1/2006 A(H1N1v) | 10^{8.2} | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 |
| A/Texas/14/2008 A(H1N1v) | 10^{8.3} | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 |
| A/Ohio/09/2015 A(H1N1v) | 10^{7.7} | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 |
| A/Minnesota/19/2011 A(H1N2v) | 10^{7.1} | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 | - | (+) 3/3 | (+) 3/3 | - |
The reactivity data for three animal viruses, A/Texas/14/2008, A/Ohio/09/2015 and A/Minnesota/19/2011 were added to the reactivity table in the labeling.
{7}
Page 8 of 10
# Performance testing with archived clinical specimens
The performance when testing clinical specimens was evaluated for the modified Influenza A Subtyping Kit (VER2) including all ZEN quencher probes and the pdmH1 reagents with modified reverse primer and probe sequences. A clinical specimen set was pre-selected from archives of past influenza seasons 2011-2012, 2013-2014 and 2015-2016. The specimens were characterized as positive or negative for influenza using the cleared predicate device or genetic sequence analysis. One group of specimens included forty-two specimens from the 2015-2016 influenza season that produced aberrant results with the current, cleared pdmH1 assay, but were confirmed to be positive with A(H1)pdm09 influenza virus by genetic sequence analysis. These specimens were tested to validate reactivity with the modified InfA, pdmInfA, and pdmH1 assays. A second group of thirty-two specimens, previously confirmed to be positive for A(H3) influenza virus, was tested to validate reactivity with the InfA, and H3 assays containing the $\mathsf{ZEN}^{\mathsf{TM}}$ double-quenched probe. A final group included specimens that were previously confirmed to be negative for influenza A by the cleared InfA assay. This testing was conducted with two enzyme systems (Invitrogen Superscript and Quanta qscript) and one extraction method cleared for use with the Influenza A Subtyping Kit.
The results are summarized in the four tables below.
Retrospective Positive Clinical Study Results-A(H1)pdm09 Comparison
| | Invitrogen SuperScript | | Quanta qScript | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Specimen Type | # of Positives | % Positive Agreement (95% CI) | # of Positives | % Positive Agreement (95% CI) |
| BW | 1/1 | 100.0 | 1/1 | 100.0 |
| NPS, NS | 34/35 | 97.1 (85.5-99.5) | 33/33 | 100.0 (89.6-100.0) |
| NW | 4/4 | 100.0 (51.0-100.0) | 4/4 | 100.0 (51.0-100.0) |
| TS | 2/2 | 100.00 (34.2-100.0) | 2/2 | 100.00 (34.2-100.0) |
{8}
Page 9 of 10
Retrospective Positive Clinical Study Results-A(H3) Comparison
| | Invitrogen SuperScript | | Quanta qScript | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Specimen Type | # of Positives | % Positive Agreement (95% CI) | # of Positives | % Positive Agreement (95% CI) |
| NA | 1/1 | 100.0 (20.7-100.0) | 1/1 | 100.0 (20.7-100.0) |
| NPS, NS | 30/30 | 100.0 (88.7-100.0) | 30/30 | 100.00 (88.7-100.00) |
| NW | 1/1 | 100.0 (20.7-100.0) | 1/1 | 100.0 (20.7-100.0) |
Retrospective Negative Clinical Study Results-A(H1)pdm09 Comparison
| | Invitrogen SuperScript | | Quanta qScript | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Specimen Type | # of Negatives | % Negative Agreement (95% CI) | # of Negatives | % Negative Agreement (95% CI) |
| NPS | 53/53 | 100.00 (93.2-100.0) | 52/52 | 100.00 (93.1-100.0) |
Retrospective Negative Clinical Study Results-A(H3) Comparison
| | Invitrogen SuperScript | | Quanta qScript | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Specimen Type | # of Negatives | % Negative Agreement (95% CI) | # of Negatives | % Negative Agreement (95% CI) |
| NPS | 29/29 | 100.00 (88.3-100.0) | 28/28 | 100.00 (87.9-100.0) |
The results demonstrate high positive and negative percent agreement between the cleared and the modified assays.
{9}
Page 10 of 10
6. Conclusion
The labeling for this modified subject device has been reviewed to verify that the indication/intended use for the device is unaffected by the modification. In addition, the submitter's description of the particular modifications and the comparative information between the modified and unmodified devices demonstrate that the fundamental scientific technology has not changed. The submitter has provided the design control information as specified in The New 510(k) Paradigm and on this basis, I recommend the device be determined substantially equivalent to the previously cleared device.
10
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.