Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Test AMP 500 (Cup, Dipcard), Wondfo Cocaine Urine Test COC 150(Cup, Dipcard), Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Test MET 500 (Cup, Dipcard)
K161214 · Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co., Ltd. · DIO · Jun 27, 2016 · Clinical Toxicology
Device Facts
Record ID
K161214
Device Name
Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Test AMP 500 (Cup, Dipcard), Wondfo Cocaine Urine Test COC 150(Cup, Dipcard), Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Test MET 500 (Cup, Dipcard)
Applicant
Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co., Ltd.
Product Code
DIO · Clinical Toxicology
Decision Date
Jun 27, 2016
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.3250
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Test AMP 500 Cup is an immunochromatographic assay for the qualitative determination of Amphetamine in human urine at a Cut-Off concentration of 500 ng/mL. This test is calibrated to d-Amphetamine (calibrator). The test provides only preliminary test results. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. GC/MS is the preferred confirmatory method. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be exercised with any drug of abuse test result, particularly when the preliminary result is positive. For in vitro diagnostic use only. This test is intended for over-the-counter (OTC) consumer use as the first step in a twostep process to provide consumers with information concerning the presence of the above stated drugs or their metabolites in a urine sample. Information regarding confirmatory testing- the second step in the process, is provided in the package labeling.
Device Story
Single-use, lateral flow immunochromatographic assay; detects d-amphetamine, benzoylecgonine, or d-methamphetamine in human urine. Device formats: Cup or DipCard. Operation: Absorb end immersed in urine; capillary action draws sample across pre-coated membrane; competitive binding between sample drug and antibody-dye conjugate. Output: Visual colored lines in Test (T) and Control (C) regions. Negative result: colored line in T region; Positive result: absence of T line. Used by consumers in home/point-of-care settings. Provides preliminary results; requires confirmatory testing (e.g., GC/MS) for clinical decision-making. Benefits: rapid, accessible initial screening for drug presence.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision/reproducibility studies performed with 6 operators over 25 days. Analytical specificity and cross-reactivity evaluated against various compounds. Method comparison against GC/MS performed with 80 clinical samples per drug. Lay-user study (n=840) conducted at three sites (hospitals/recovery center) with participants aged 21-63; demonstrated high accuracy and ease of use. No clinical diagnostic studies required.
Technological Characteristics
Lateral flow immunochromatographic assay; competitive binding principle. Materials: test device, desiccant, aluminum pouch, urine cup. Form factors: DipCard, Cup. Connectivity: None (standalone). Sterilization: Not specified. Software: None.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of Amphetamine, Cocaine (Benzoylecgonine), or Methamphetamine in human urine for OTC consumer use as a preliminary screening step.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A cocaine and cocaine metabolite test system is a device intended to measure cocaine and a cocaine metabolite (benzoylecgonine) in serum, plasma, and urine. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of cocaine use or overdose.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). A cocaine and cocaine metabolite test system is not exempt if it is intended for any use other than employment or insurance testing or is intended for Federal drug testing programs. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9, provided the test system is intended for employment and insurance testing and includes a statement in the labeling that the device is intended solely for use in employment and insurance testing, and does not include devices intended for Federal drug testing programs (*e.g.,* programs run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. military).
Predicate Devices
Advin Multi-Drug Screen Test (k122809)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k161214
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
Amphetamine, Cocaine and Methamphetamine
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative Lateral Flow chromatographic immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co., Ltd.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Test AMP 500 (Cup, DipCard)
Wondfo Cocaine Urine Test COC 150 (Cup, DipCard)
Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Test MET 500 (Cup, DipCard)
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DIO | Class II | 21 CFR, 862.3250
Cocaine Test System | Toxicology (91) |
| DKZ | Class II | 21 CFR, 862.3100
Amphetamine Test System | Toxicology (91) |
| DJC | Class II | 21 CFR, 862.3610
Methamphetamine Test System | Toxicology (91) |
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Test AMP 500 Cup is an immunochromatographic assay for the qualitative determination of Amphetamine in human urine at a Cut-Off concentration of 500 ng/mL. This test is calibrated to d-Amphetamine (calibrator).
The test provides only preliminary test results. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. GC/MS is the preferred confirmatory method. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be exercised with any drug of abuse test result, particularly when the preliminary result is positive. For in vitro diagnostic use only. This test is intended for over-the-counter (OTC) consumer use as the first step in a two-step process to provide consumers with information concerning the presence or absence of the above stated drugs or their metabolites in a urine sample. Information regarding confirmatory testing- the second step in the process, is provided in the package labeling.
Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Test AMP 500 DipCard is an immunochromatographic assay for the qualitative determination of Amphetamine in human urine at a Cut-Off concentration of 500 ng/mL. This test is calibrated to d-Amphetamine (calibrator).
The test provides only preliminary test results. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. GC/MS is the preferred confirmatory method. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be exercised with any drug of abuse test result, particularly when the preliminary result is positive. For in vitro diagnostic use only. This test is intended for over-the-counter (OTC) consumer use as the first step in a two-step process to provide consumers with information concerning the presence or absence of the above stated drugs or their metabolites in a urine sample. Information regarding confirmatory testing- the second step in the process, is provided in the package labeling.
Wondfo Cocaine Urine Test COC 150 Cup is an immunochromatographic assay for the qualitative determination of Benzoylecgonine in human urine at a Cut-Off concentration of 150 ng/mL. This test is calibrated to Benzoylecgonine (calibrator).
The test provides only preliminary test results. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. GC/MS is the preferred confirmatory method. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be exercised with any drug of abuse test result, particularly when the preliminary result is positive. For in vitro diagnostic use only. This test is intended for over-the-counter (OTC) consumer use as the first step in a two-step process to provide consumers with information concerning the presence or absence of the above stated drugs or their
2
{2}
metabolites in a urine sample. Information regarding confirmatory testing- the second step in the process, is provided in the package labeling.
Wondfo Cocaine Urine Test COC 150 DipCard is an immunochromatographic assay for the qualitative determination of Benzoylecgonine in human urine at a Cut-Off concentration of 150 ng/mL. This test is calibrated to Benzoylecgonine (calibrator).
The test provides only preliminary test results. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. GC/MS is the preferred confirmatory method. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be exercised with any drug of abuse test result, particularly when the preliminary result is positive. For in vitro diagnostic use only. This test is intended for over-the-counter (OTC) consumer use as the first step in a two-step process to provide consumers with information concerning the presence or absence of the above stated drugs or their metabolites in a urine sample. Information regarding confirmatory testing- the second step in the process, is provided in the package labeling.
Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Test MET 500 Cup is an immunochromatographic assay for the qualitative determination of Methamphetamine in human urine at a Cut-Off concentration of 500 ng/mL. This test is calibrated to d-Methamphetamine (calibrator).
The test provides only preliminary test results. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. GC/MS is the preferred confirmatory method. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be exercised with any drug of abuse test result, particularly when the preliminary result is positive. For in vitro diagnostic use only. This test is intended for over-the-counter (OTC) consumer use as the first step in a two-step process to provide consumers with information concerning the presence or absence of the above stated drugs or their metabolites in a urine sample. Information regarding confirmatory testing- the second step in the process, is provided in the package labeling.
Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Test MET 500 DipCard is an immunochromatographic assay for the qualitative determination of Methamphetamine in human urine at a Cut-Off concentration of 500 ng/mL. This test is calibrated to d-Methamphetamine (calibrator).
The test provides only preliminary test results. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. GC/MS is the preferred confirmatory method. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be exercised with any drug of abuse test result, particularly when the preliminary result is positive. For in vitro diagnostic use only. This test is intended for over-the-counter (OTC) consumer use as the first step in a two-step process to provide consumers with information concerning the presence or absence of the above stated drugs or their metabolites in a urine sample. Information regarding confirmatory testing- the second step in the process, is provided in the package labeling.
3
{3}
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For in vitro diagnostic use only, for over-the-counter use.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Not applicable. The devices are visually read single-use devices.
I. Device Description:
Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Tests, Wondfo Cocaine Urine Tests and Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Tests are immunochromatographic assays that use a lateral flow system for the qualitative detection of d-amphetamine, Benzoylecgonine or d-methamphetamine (target analyte) in human urine. It is a single-use visually read in vitro diagnostic device, which comes in the format of DipCard or Cup. The product contains a Test Device (in one of the two formats), a package insert and a urine cup. Each test and format is available separately. Each test device is sealed with a desiccant in an aluminum pouch.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Advin Multi-Drug Screen Test
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k122809
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device
k161214
Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Test | Predicate device
k122809
Advin Multi-Drug Screen Test |
| Calibrator | d-Amphetamine | Same |
| Methodology | Competitive binding, lateral flow
immunochromatographic assays based on
the principle of antigen antibody
immunochemistry. | Same |
| Type of Test | Qualitative | Same |
{4}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device k161214 Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Test | Predicate device k122809 Advin Multi-Drug Screen Test |
| Specimen Type | Human Urine | Same |
| Cut-Off Values | 500 ng/mL | Same |
| Intended Use | For over-the-counter use. | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device k161214 Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Test | Predicate device k122809 Advin Multi-Drug Screen Test |
| Indication(s) for Use | For the qualitative determination of d-amphetamine in human urine. | For the qualitative determination of multiple drugs in human urine. |
| Configurations | Cup and Dip Card | Cup, Dip Card, Cassette |
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device k161214 Wondfo Cocaine Urine Test | Predicate device k122809 Advin Multi-Drug Screen Test |
| Calibrator | Benzoylecgonine | Same |
| Methodology | Competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays based on the principle of antigen antibody immunochemistry. | Same |
| Type of Test | Qualitative | Same |
| Specimen Type | Human Urine | Same |
| Cut-Off Values | 150 ng/mL | Same |
| Intended Use | For over-the-counter use. | Same |
{5}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device k161214 Wondfo Cocaine Urine Test | Predicate device k122809 Advin Multi-Drug Screen Test |
| Indication(s) for Use | For the qualitative determination of Benzoylecgonine in human urine. | For the qualitative determination of multiple drugs in human urine. |
| Configurations | Cup and Dip Card | Cup, Dip Card, Cassette |
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device k161214 Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Test | Predicate device k122809 Advin Multi-Drug Screen Test |
| Calibrator | d-methamphetamine | Same |
| Methodology | Competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays based on the principle of antigen antibody immunochemistry. | Same |
| Type of Test | Qualitative | Same |
| Specimen Type | Human Urine | Same |
| Cut-Off Values | 500 ng/mL | Same |
| Intended Use | For over-the-counter use. | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device k161214 Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Test | Predicate device k122809 Advin Multi-Drug Screen Test |
| Indication(s) for Use | For the qualitative determination of d-methamphetamine in human urine. | For the qualitative determination of multiple drugs in human urine. |
| Configurations | Cup and Dip Card | Cup, Dip Card, Cassette |
{6}
7
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
In Vitro Diagnostic Devices; Guidance for the Preparation of 510(k) Submission, HHS Publication FDA 97-4224.
Premarket Submission and labeling Recommendations for Drugs of Abuse Screening Tests, Draft Guidance, December 2, 2003.
L. Test Principle:
Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Tests, Wondfo Cocaine Urine Tests and Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Tests use a lateral flow, one step system for the qualitative detection of d-Amphetamine, Benzoylecgonine or d-Methamphetamine in human urine. Each assay uses a monoclonal antibody-dye conjugate against drugs with gold chloride and fixed drug-protein conjugates and anti-mouse IgG polyclonal antibody in membranes.
When the absorb end is immersed into the urine specimen, the urine is absorbed into the device by capillary action, mixes with the antibody-dye conjugate, and flows across the pre-coated membrane. When sample drug levels are zero or below the target Cut-Off (the detection sensitivity of the test), antibody-dye conjugate binds to the drug-protein conjugate immobilized in the Test Region (T) of the device. This produces a colored Test line that, regardless of its intensity, indicates a negative result.
When sample drug levels are at or above the target Cut-Off, the free drug in the sample binds to the antibody-dye conjugate preventing the antibody-dye conjugate from binding to the drug-protein conjugate immobilized in the Test Region (T) of the device. This prevents the development of a distinct colored band in the test region, indicating a potentially positive result.
To serve as a procedure control, a colored line will appear at the Control Region (C), if the test has been performed properly because of the antibody-dye conjugate binding to anti-mouse IgG immobilized in the Control Region(C) of the device.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision studies were carried out for Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Tests and Wondfo Cocaine Urine Tests using samples with concentrations of -100% cut off, -75% cut off, -50% cut off, -25% cut off, +25% cut off, +50% cut off, +75% cut off and +100% cut off. These samples were prepared by spiking drug in negative samples. Each drug concentration was confirmed by GC/MS. All sample aliquots were blindly labeled and randomized. For each concentration, tests were performed by six operators in two runs per day for 25 days per device. The results obtained are summarized in the following tables:
{7}
8
# Amphetamine (AMP) Dip Card Format
| Lot Number | -100% cut off | -75% cut off | -50% cut off | -25% cutoff | cut off | +25% cut off | +50% cut off | +75% cut off | +100% cut off |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot 1 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 43+/7- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
| Lot 2 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 44+/6- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
| Lot 3 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 44+/6- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
# Amphetamine (AMP) Cup Format
| Lot Number | -100% cut off | -75% cut off | -50% cut off | -25% cutoff | cut off | +25% cut off | +50% cut off | +75% cut off | +100% cut off |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot 1 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 44+/6- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
| Lot 2 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 43+/7- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
| Lot 3 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 44+/6- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
# Cocaine (COC) Dip Card Format
| Lot Number | -100% cut off | -75% cut off | -50% cut off | -25% cutoff | cut off | +25% cut off | +50% cut off | +75% cut off | +100% cut off |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot 1 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 43+/7- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
| Lot 2 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 44+/6- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
| Lot 3 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 43+/7- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
# Cocaine (COC) Cup Format
| Lot Number | -100% cut off | -75% cut off | -50% cut off | -25% cutoff | cut off | +25% cut off | +50% cut off | +75% cut off | +100% cut off |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot 1 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 44+/6- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
| Lot 2 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 43+/7- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
| Lot 3 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 43+/7- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
The Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Test MET 500 (Cup, DipCard) precision performance data are found in k122961.
## b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable.
## c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Device stability for Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Tests and Wondfo Cocaine Urine Tests has been evaluated through accelerated and real-time studies. A transport simulation study was performed to test extreme shipping temperatures. Protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable. The manufacturer claims that the devices are stable at $4 - 30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$
{8}
(39-86°F) for 24 months.
The Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Test MET 500 (Cup, DipCard) stability performance data are found in k122961. The manufacturer claims that the devices are stable at 4-30 °C (39-86°F) for 18 months.
This device has internal process controls. A colored line appearing in the control region confirms that sufficient sample volume and that the correct technique has been used. Users are instructed that the test is invalid if a colored line failed to appear in the control region. External control materials are not supplied with these devices; however the labeling provides information on how to obtain quality control materials.
d. Detection limit:
Not applicable.
e. Analytical specificity:
To test specificity of Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Tests and Wondfo Cocaine Urine Tests, drug metabolites and other components that are likely to interfere in urine samples were tested by three operators using three lots of each device. The lowest concentration that caused a positive result for each compound device are listed below. There were no differences observed for the cup and dipcard test formats.
Amphetamine
| Compound | Concentration (ng/mL) | % Cross-reactivity |
| --- | --- | --- |
| d- Amphetamine | 500 | 100% |
| l - Amphetamine | 25000 | 2% |
| d,l - Amphetamine | 1500 | 33% |
| Phentermine | 1500 | 33% |
| Hydroxyamphetamine | 8000 | 6% |
| Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) | 2500 | 20% |
| d-Methamphetamine | Negative at 100000 | <1% |
| 1-Methamphetamine | Negative at 100000 | <1% |
| ephedrine | Negative at 100000 | <1% |
| Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA) | Negative at 100000 | <1% |
| 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA) | Negative at 100000 | <1% |
{9}
10
Cocaine
| Compound | Concentration (ng/mL) | % Cross-reactivity |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Benzoylecogonine | 150 | 100% |
| Cocaine HCl | 375 | 40% |
| Cocaethylene | 6250 | 2.4% |
| Ecgonine | 16000 | 0.9% |
| Norcocaine | Positive at 50000 | 0.3% |
Methamphetamine
| Compound | Concentration (ng/mL) | % Cross-reactivity |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (+/-) 3,4-Methylenedioxy-n-ethylamphetamine(MDEA) | 500 | 100% |
| (+/-) 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) | 500 | 100% |
| d/l-Methamphetamine | 500 | 100% |
| l-Methamphetamine | 10,000 | 5% |
| l-Amphetamine | 37,500 | 1.3% |
Additional cross reactivity performance data for Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Test MET 500 (Cup, DipCard) are found in k122961.
For Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Tests and Wondfo Cocaine Urine Tests potential interfering substances found in human urine of physiological or pathological conditions were added to drug-free urine and target drugs urine with concentrations at 25% below and 25% above Cut-Off levels. These urine samples were tested by three operators using three lots of each device. Compounds that showed no interference at a concentration of 100μg/mL are summarized in the following tables. There were no differences observed for the cup and dipcard test formats.
Amphetamine
| 4-Acetamidophenol | L-Ephedrine | Oxycodone |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Acetophenetidin | (-) Y Ephedrine | Oxymetazoline |
| N-Acetylprocainamide | Erythromycin | Papaverine |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | β-Estradiol | Penicillin-G |
| Aminopyrine | Estrone-3-sulfate | Pentazocaine |
| Amitryptyline | Ethyl aminobenzoate | Pentobarbital |
| Amobarbital | Fenfluramine | Perphenazine |
| Amoxicillin | Fenoprofen | Phencyclidine |
| Ampicillin | Furosemide | Phenelzine |
{10}
| Ascorbic acid | Gentisic acid | Phenobarbital |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Aspartame | Hemoglobin | Phetoin |
| Atropine | Hydralazine | L-Phenylephrine |
| Benzilic acid | Hydrochlorothiazide | Phenylpropanolamine |
| Benzoic acid | Hydrocodone | Prednisolone |
| Benzoylecgonine | Hydrocortisone | Prednisone |
| Bilirubin | O-Hydroxyhippuric acid | Procaine |
| Brompheniramine | 3-Hydroxytyramine | Promazine |
| Caffeine | Ibuprofen | Promethazine |
| Cannabidiol | Imipramine | D,L-Propanolol |
| Cannabinol | (-) Isoproterenol | D-Propoxyphene |
| Chloralhydrate | Isoxsuprine | Quinidine |
| Chloramphenicol | Ketamine | Quinine |
| Chlordiazepoxide | Ketoprofen | Ranitidine |
| Chlorothiazide | Labetalol | Salicylic acid |
| (±) Chlorpheniramine | Levorphanol | Secobarbital |
| Chlorpromazine | Loperamide | Sulfamethazine |
| Chloroquine | Maprotiline | Sulindac |
| Cholesterol | Meperidine | Temazepam |
| Clomipramine | Meprobamate | Tetracycline |
| Clonidine | Methadone | Tetrahydrocortisone |
| Cocaine hydrochloride | Methylphenidate | Tetrahydrozoline |
| Codeine | Morphine-3-D-glucuronide | Δ9-THC-COOH |
| Cortisone | Nalidixic acid | Thebaine |
| (-) Cotinine | Naloxone | Thiamine |
| Creatinine | Naltrexone | Thioridazine |
| Deoxycorticosterone | Naproxen | D,L-Thyroxine |
| Dextromethorphan | Niacinamide | Tolbutamide |
| Diazepam | Nifedipine | Triamterene |
| Diclofenac | Norcodein | Trifluoperazine |
| Diflunisal | Norethindrone | Trimethoprim |
| Digoxin | D-Norpropoxyphene | Trimipramine |
| Diphenhydramine | Noscapine | Tryptamine |
| Doxylamine | D,L-Octopamine | D, L-Tyrosine |
| Ecgonine hydrochloride | Oxalic acid | Uric acid |
| Ecgonine methylester | Oxazepam | Verapamil |
| (IR,2S)-(-)-Ephedrine | Oxolinic acid | Zomepirac |
11
{11}
Cocaine
| Acetaminophen | Estrone-3-sulfate | Oxymetazoline |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Acetophenetidin | Ethyl-p-aminobenzoate | Papaverine |
| N-Acetylprocainamide | Fenoprofen | Penicillin-G |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | Furosemide | Pentobarbital |
| Aminopyrine | Gentisic acid | Perphenazine |
| Amitryptyline | Hemoglobin | Phencyclidine |
| Amobarbital | Hydralazine | Phenelzine |
| Amoxicillin | Hydrochlorothiazide | Phenobarbital |
| Ampicillin | Hydrocodone | Phentermine |
| L-Ascorbic acid | Hydrocortisone | L-Phenylephrine |
| DL-Amphetamine Sulfate | O-Hydroxyhippuric acid | β-Phenylethylamine |
| Apomorphine | p-Hydroxymethamphetamine | Phenylpropanolamine |
| Aspartame | 3-Hydroxytyramine | Prednisolone |
| Atropine | Ibuprofen | Prednisone |
| Benzilic acid | Imipramine | Procaine |
| Benzoic acid | Iproniazid | Promazine |
| Benzphetamine | (±) - Isoproterenol | Promethazine |
| (±) -Brompheniramine | Isoxsuprine | DL-Propranolol |
| Caffeine | Ketamine | D-Propoxyphene |
| Cannabidiol | Ketoprofen | D-Pseudoephedrine |
| Cannabinol | Labetalol | Quinidine |
| Chloralhydrate | Levorphanol | Quinine |
| Chloramphenicol | Loperamide | Ranitidine |
| Chlordiazepoxide | Maprotiline | Salicylic acid |
| Chlorothiazide | Meperidine | Secobarbital |
| (±) -Chlorpheniramine | Meprobamate | Serotonin |
| Chlorpromazine | Methadone | Sulfamethazine |
| Chloroquine | Methoxyphenamine | Sulindac |
| Cholesterol | (±) -3,4-Methylene dioxyamphetamine | Temazepam |
| Clomipramine | Methylene-dioxymethamphetamine | Tetracycline |
| Clonidine | Morphine-3-β-D glucuronide | Tetrahydrocortisone 3-(β-D glucuronide) |
| Codeine | Morphine Sulfate | Tetrahydrozoline |
| Cortisone | Nalidixic acid | Thebaine |
| (-) Cotinine | Naloxone | Thiamine |
| Creatinine | Naltrexone | Thioridazine |
12
{12}
| Deoxycorticosterone | Naproxen | DL-Tyrosine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Dextromethorphan | Niacinamide | Tolbutamide |
| Diazepam | Nifedipine | Triamterene |
| Diclofenac | Norcodein | Trifluoperazine |
| Diflunisal | Norethindrone | Trimethoprim |
| Digoxin | D-Norpropoxyphene | Trimipramine |
| Diphenhydramine | Noscapine | Tryptamine |
| Doxylamine | DL-Octopamine | DL-Tryptophan |
| Ecgonine methylester | Oxalic acid | Tyramine |
| (-) - Ψ-Ephedrine | Oxazepam | Uric acid |
| Erythromycin | Oxolinic acid | Verapamil |
| β-Estradiol | Oxycodone | Zomepirac |
The Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Test MET 500 (Cup, DipCard) interference performance data are found in k122961.
Effect of Urine Specific Gravity and Urine pH:
To investigate the effect of urine specific gravity and urine pH, urine samples for Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Tests and Wondfo Cocaine Urine Tests, with 1.000 to 1.035 specific gravity (1.000, 1.003, 1.008, 1.014, 1.018, 1.020, 1.022, 1.025, 1.028, 1.030, 1.032, and 1.035) and urine samples with pH 4 to 9 (4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, and 9.0) were spiked with target drugs at $25\%$ below and $25\%$ above Cut-Off levels. These samples were tested using three lots of each device. Results were all positive for samples at and above $+25\%$ Cut-Off and all negative for samples at and below $-25\%$ Cut-Off. There were no differences observed for the cup and dipcard test formats and the sponsor claims that pH and specific gravity do not affect urine testing results around each analyte cut-off.
The Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Test MET 500 (Cup, DipCard) Urine Specific Gravity and Urine pH performance data are found in k122961.
f. Assay cut-off:
Cutoff studies were performed for Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Tests and Wondfo Cocaine Urine Tests using a combination of clinical and spiked samples for each drug (n=150 per drug). The testing protocol was identical for each drug. 25 clinical samples were collected for each drug. Concentrations of amphetamine and cocaine in the samples were determined by GC/MS. An additional 125 drug free negative samples were obtained for each drug and spiked with either amphetamine or cocaine at -50% cutoff, -25% cutoff, cutoff, +25% cutoff, and +50% cutoff. 30 samples were tested at each concentration for each drug in replicates of 30 using three lots and 3 operators (n=270).
{13}
Results are summarized below:
Amphetamine
| | Concentration of sample ng/mL | Number of determinations | Dip Card Results #Neg/#Pos | Cup Results #Neg/#Pos |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot 1 | -50% cutoff | 90 | 90/0 | 90/0 |
| | -25% cutoff | 90 | 90/0 | 90/0 |
| | Cutoff | 90 | 11/79 | 12/78 |
| | +25%cutoff | 90 | 0/90 | 0/90 |
| | +50% cutoff | 90 | 0/90 | 0/90 |
| Lot 2 | -50% cutoff | 90 | 90/0 | 90/0 |
| | -25% cutoff | 90 | 90/0 | 90/0 |
| | Cutoff | 90 | 12/78 | 11/79 |
| | +25%cutoff | 90 | 0/90 | 0/90 |
| | +50% cutoff | 90 | 0/90 | 0/90 |
| Lot 3 | -50% cutoff | 90 | 90/0 | 90/0 |
| | -25% cutoff | 90 | 90/0 | 90/0 |
| | Cutoff | 90 | 11/79 | 12/78 |
| | +25%cutoff | 90 | 0/90 | 0/90 |
| | +50% cutoff | 90 | 0/90 | 0/90 |
Cocaine
| | Concentration of sample ng/mL | Number of determinations | Dip Card Results #Neg/#Pos | Cup Results #Neg/#Pos |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot 1 | -50% cutoff | 90 | 90/0 | 90/0 |
| | -25% cutoff | 90 | 90/0 | 90/0 |
| | Cutoff | 90 | 12/78 | 12/78 |
| | +25%cutoff | 90 | 0/90 | 0/90 |
| | +50% cutoff | 90 | 0/90 | 0/90 |
| Lot 2 | -50% cutoff | 90 | 90/0 | 90/0 |
| | -25% cutoff | 90 | 90/0 | 90/0 |
| | Cutoff | 90 | 12/78 | 12/78 |
| | +25%cutoff | 90 | 0/90 | 0/90 |
| | +50% cutoff | 90 | 0/90 | 0/90 |
| Lot 3 | -50% cutoff | 90 | 90/0 | 90/0 |
| | -25% cutoff | 90 | 90/0 | 90/0 |
| | Cutoff | 90 | 12/78 | 12/78 |
| | +25%cutoff | 90 | 0/90 | 0/90 |
| | +50% cutoff | 90 | 0/90 | 0/90 |
The Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Test MET 500 (Cup, DipCard) cut off performance data are found in k122961.
{14}
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The method comparison studies for Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Tests and Wondfo Cocaine Urine Tests were performed in-house with three different laboratory assistants for each format of the device. Operators ran 80 (40 negative and 40 positive) unaltered clinical samples for each drug. The samples were blind labeled and compared to GC/MS results. The results are presented in the tables below:
Amphetamine (AMP) Dip Card
| Dip Card format | | Negative | Low Negative by GC/MS (less than -50%) | Near Cutoff Negative by GC/MS (Between -50% and cut-off) | Near Cutoff Positive by GC/MS (Between the cut-off and +50%) | High Positive by GC/MS (greater than +50%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 10 |
| | Negative | 10 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 10 |
| | Negative | 10 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 10 |
| | Negative | 10 | 17 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results of AMP Dip Card
| Viewer | Sample Number | GC/MS Result | Dipcard Format Viewer Results |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Viewer A | AMP5062 | 480 | Positive |
| Viewer A | AMP5065 | 481 | Positive |
| Viewer B | AMP5062 | 480 | Positive |
| Viewer C | AMP5062 | 480 | Positive |
| Viewer B | AMP5218 | 365 | Positive |
{15}
16
Amphetamine (AMP) Cup
| Cup format | | Negative | Low Negative by GC/MS (less than -50%) | Near Cutoff Negative by GC/MS (Between -50% and cut-off) | Near Cutoff Positive by GC/MS (Between the cut-off and +50%) | High Positive by GC/MS (greater than +50%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 10 |
| | Negative | 10 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 10 |
| | Negative | 10 | 17 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 10 |
| | Negative | 10 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results of AMP Cup
| Viewer | Sample Number | GC/MS Result | Cup Format Viewer Results |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Viewer A | AMP5062 | 480 | Positive |
| Viewer A | AMP5065 | 481 | Positive |
| Viewer B | AMP5062 | 480 | Positive |
| Viewer C | AMP5062 | 480 | Positive |
| Viewer C | AMP5065 | 481 | Positive |
Cocaine (COC) Dip Card
| Dip Card format | | Negative | Low Negative by GC/MS (less than -50%) | Near Cutoff Negative by GC/MS (Between -50% and cut-off) | Near Cutoff Positive by GC/MS (Between the cut-off and +50%) | High Positive by GC/MS (greater than +50%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 10 |
| | Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 10 |
| | Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 11 |
| | Negative | 10 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
{16}
Discordant Results of COC DipCard
| Viewer | Sample Number | GC/MS Result (ng/mL) | DipCard Format Viewer Results |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Viewer A | COC1215 | 145 | Positive |
| Viewer A | COC1217 | 146 | Positive |
| Viewer B | COC1215 | 145 | Positive |
| Viewer B | COC1217 | 146 | Positive |
| Viewer C | COC1217 | 146 | Positive |
Cocaine (COC) Cup
| Cup format | | Negative | Low Negative by GC/MS (less than -50%) | Near Cutoff Negative by GC/MS (Between -50% and cut-off) | Near Cutoff Positive by GC/MS (Between the cut-off and +50%) | High Positive by GC/MS (greater than +50%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 10 |
| | Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 10 |
| | Negative | 10 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 10 |
| | Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results of COC Cup
| Viewer | Sample Number | GC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Cup Format Viewer Results |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Viewer A | COC1215 | 145 | Positive |
| Viewer B | COC1215 | 145 | Positive |
| Viewer C | COC1215 | 145 | Positive |
| Viewer C | COC1217 | 146 | Positive |
| Viewer A | COC1217 | 146 | Negative |
The Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Test MET 500 (Cup, DipCard) method comparison performance data are found in k122961.
{17}
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable. This device is for use with urine samples only.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Consumer / lay person study:
A lay user study was performed by a total of 840 lay users at three intended user sites: two hospitals and one drug addiction recovery center in P.R. China. The Wondfo Amphetamine Urine Test devices were tested by 280 lay persons, the Wondfo Cocaine Urine Test devices were tested by 280 lay persons and the Wondfo Methamphetamine Urine Test devices were tested by 280 lay persons. The participants had diverse educational and professional backgrounds and ranged in age from 21 to 63 years.
Urine samples were prepared at the following concentrations; negative, +/-75%, +/-50%, +/-25% of the cutoff by spiking drugs into drug free-pooled urine specimens. The concentrations of the samples were confirmed by GC/MS. Each sample was aliquoted into individual containers and blind-labeled. Each participant was provided with the package insert, 1 blind labeled sample and a device (cup or dipcard). Lay-users were also given surveys on the ease of understanding the package insert instructions. All lay users indicated that the device instructions could be easily followed. The lay user study was performed using English only labeling. A Flesch-Kincaid reading analysis was performed on each package insert and the scores revealed a reading Grade Level of 7. The results are summarized below:
18
{18}
Comparison between GC/MS and Amphetamine Cup
| % of Cutoff | Number of samples | d-Amphetamine Concentration by GC/MS (ng/mL) | Lay person results | | The percentage of correct results (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | No. of Positive | No. of Negative | |
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 126.3 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 20 | 248.6 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 377.1 | 1 | 19 | 95.0 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 625.8 | 18 | 2 | 90.0 |
| +50% Cutoff | 20 | 753.2 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 874.3 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
Comparison between GC/MS and Amphetamine Dip Card
| % of Cutoff | Number of samples | d-Amphetamine Concentration by GC/MS (ng/mL) | Lay person results | | The percentage of correct results (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | No. of Positive | No. of Negative | |
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 126.3 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 20 | 248.6 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 377.1 | 2 | 18 | 90.0 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 625.8 | 18 | 2 | 90.0 |
| +50% Cutoff | 20 | 753.2 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 874.3 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
Comparison between GC/MS and Cocaine Cup
| % of Cutoff | Number of samples | Benzoylecgonine Concentration by GC/MS (ng/mL) | Lay person results | | The percentage of correct results (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | No. of Positive | No. of Negative | |
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 38.1 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 20 | 75.6 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 113.4 | 2 | 18 | 90.0 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 186.7 | 18 | 2 | 90.0 |
| +50% Cutoff | 20 | 226.3 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 259.8 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
{19}
Comparison between GC/MS and Cocaine Dip Card
| % of Cutoff | Number of samples | Benzoylecgonine Concentration by GC/MS (ng/mL) | Lay person results | | The percentage of correct results (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | No. of Positive | No. of Negative | |
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 38.1 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 20 | 75.6 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 113.4 | 2 | 18 | 90.0 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 186.7 | 18 | 2 | 90.0 |
| +50% Cutoff | 20 | 226.3 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 259.8 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
Comparison between GC/MS and Methamphetamine Cup
| % of Cutoff | Number of samples | Methamphetamine Concentration by GC/MS (ng/mL) | Lay person results | | The percentage of correct results (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | No. of Positive | No. of Negative | |
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 124.8 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 20 | 251.3 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 377.6 | 2 | 18 | 90.0 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 625.9 | 18 | 2 | 90.0 |
| +50% Cutoff | 20 | 748.3 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 878.1 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
Comparison between GC/MS and Methamphetamine Dip Card
| % of Cutoff | Number of samples | Methamphetamine Concentration by GC/MS (ng/mL) | Lay person results | | The percentage of correct results (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | No. of Positive | No. of Negative | |
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 124.8 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 20 | 251.3 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 377.6 | 2 | 18 | 90.0 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 625.9 | 18 | 2 | 90.0 |
| +50% Cutoff | 20 | 748.3 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 878.1 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
{20}
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Not applicable.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
21
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.