K161043 · Syneron Candela Corporation · PBX · Sep 12, 2016 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K161043
Device Name
Profound System
Applicant
Syneron Candela Corporation
Product Code
PBX · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Sep 12, 2016
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4400
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Profound System is indicated for use in dermatologic and general surgical procedures for electrocoagulation and hemostasis. Specifically, the 25° Dermal handpiece and cartridge are used for percutaneous treatment of facial wrinkles, and the 75° SubQ handpiece and cartridge are used to improve the appearance of cellulite in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I-III as supported by long-term clinical data (6 months).
Device Story
Profound System is an electrosurgical device using bipolar radiofrequency (RF) energy for thermal tissue heating. System includes a console with RF generator/GUI, two reusable applicators (25° Dermal, 75° SubQ), and sterile, single-use micro-electrode needle cartridges. Physician operates system in clinical setting; sets treatment parameters via GUI; monitors real-time tissue temperature feedback. RF energy delivered through needles into dermal/subcutaneous layers; needle geometry defines treatment volume; channels controlled independently. Output is thermal coagulation; intended to treat facial wrinkles and cellulite. Clinical benefit includes improved skin appearance; procedure typically performed with tumescent anesthesia and cold air.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective, single-arm, multicenter study of 50 female subjects (100 thighs, ages 25-60, Fitzpatrick I-III). Primary endpoint: 80% of thighs showing ≥1 point improvement in cellulite at 3 months. Results: 94% of thighs showed improvement at 3 months; 93% maintained improvement at 6 months. No serious device-related adverse events reported.
Technological Characteristics
Bipolar fractionated RF electrosurgical device. Frequency: 460 ± 5 kHz. Max output: 84 VRMS. Components: RF generator, reusable applicators, sterile single-use electrode cartridges. Temperature sensors provide real-time feedback. Electrical safety per IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-2-2; EMC per EN 60601-1-2. Biocompatibility per ISO 10993.
Indications for Use
Indicated for dermatologic/general surgical electrocoagulation and hemostasis; percutaneous treatment of facial wrinkles (25° handpiece); improvement of cellulite appearance in Fitzpatrick skin types I-III (75° handpiece).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories is a device intended to remove tissue and control bleeding by use of high-frequency electrical current.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular border with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol featuring three overlapping human profiles facing to the right, with flowing lines beneath them, resembling a bird or a wave.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
September 12, 2016
Syneron Candela Corporation % Janice Hogan Regulatory Counsel Hogan Lovells Us Llp 1835 Market Street 29th Floor Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
Re: K161043
Trade/Device Name: Profound System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4400 Regulation Name: Electrosurgical Cutting And Coagulation Device And Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PBX, GEI Dated: August 15, 2016 Received: August 15, 2016
Dear Janice Hogan:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Binita S.Ashar -S
Binita S. Ashar, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.S. Director Division of Surgical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement on last paqe
510(k) Number (if known)
K161043
Device Name
Profound System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Profound System is indicated for use in dermatologic and general surgical procedures for electrocoagulation and hemostasis. Specifically, the 25º Dermal handpiece and cartidge are used for percutaneous treatment of facial wrinkles, and the 75° SubQ handpiece and cartridge are used to improve the appearance of cellulite in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I-III as supported by long-term clinical data (6 months).
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
区 Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
□ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
### 510(k) Summary Profound System
| Submitted by: | Syneron Candela Corporation<br>530 Boston Post Road<br>Wayland, MA 01778-1886 |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Ruthie Amir<br>Global Vice President of Clinical, Regulatory, and Education<br>Tel: 508-358-7400 x330<br>Fax: 508-358-5602 |
| Submission Correspondent: | Janice Hogan<br>Hogan Lovells US LLP<br>1835 Market St., 29th Floor<br>Philadelphia, PA 19103<br>Tel: (267) 675-4600<br>Fax: (267) 675-4601<br>janice.hogan@hoganlovells.com |
| Date prepared: | September 12, 2016 |
| Trade Name: | Profound System |
| Common Name: | Electrosurgical unit and accessories |
| Classification: | Class II per 21 C.F.R. § 878.4400 – Electrosurgical cutting and<br>coagulation device and accessories<br>Product Code PBX, GEI |
| Predicate Devices: | Primary Predicate Devices<br>Syneron-Candela's Profound System (K082391, K080145)<br>Viora Ltd.'s V10 System (K150035)<br>Reference Predicate Device<br>Cynosure's Cellulaze Laser (K123407) |
## Intended Use / Indications for Use:
The Profound System is indicated for use in dermatologic and general surgical procedures for electrocoagulation and hemostasis. Specifically, the 25° Dermal handpiece and cartridge are used for percutaneous treatment of facial wrinkles, and the 75° SubQ handpiece and cartridge are used to improve the appearance of cellulite in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I-III as supported by longterm clinical data (6 months).
## Device Description:
The Profound System is comprised of the following components: a re-usable console containing a
{4}------------------------------------------------
radiofrequency (RF) generator and graphical user interface; two re-usable treatment applicators; and two disposable, single use, sterile electrode cartridges. Bipolar RF energy is delivered from the RF generator through the electrodes into the dermal layers beneath the surface of the skin. The volume of the treated area is defined by the geometry of the individual micro-electrode needle pairs, which are all electrically isolated from each other and controlled independently by separated RF channels within the console. In addition, temperature sensors provide real-time feedback of tissue temperature. The treatment dose is controlled by the physician.
### Technoloqical Characteristics:
The Profound System has similar technological characteristics as its predicates. The primary purpose of this submission is to expand the Profound's indications for use to include long-term improvement in the appearance of cellulite.
The Profound design and components are very similar to those previously cleared. Specifically, the cleared 25° Dermal handpiece and associated electrode cartridge have remained essentially the same, with minor hardware and software changes. The company has also added an option for the physician to use a 75° SubQ handpiece and associated electrode cartridge. The modified device is based on the same principles of operation, i.e., thermal heating. The RF frequency and maximum output voltage per channel are the same as for the cleared Profound System. Same as the previously cleared Profound, the system has an electrically powered console with a graphical user interface through which the physician pre-sets treatment parameters (as appropriate for each patient) and obtains real-time feedback regarding ongoing treatment. Minor software changes have been made and the updated software has been subjected to verification and validation. The technological differences compared to the predicates do not raise any different types of safety or effectiveness questions, because the modified device operates in the same manner and the treatment parameters are the same as or within the range of the predicates.
### Summary of Substantial Equivalence:
The subject Profound System has the same intended use and similar indications for use as its predicates. The indications of the subject device are the same as those of the predicate. K082391. except for the proposed additional indication for use: "...improve the appearance of cellulite in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I-III as supported by long-term clinical data (6 months)." The newly added indications for use, while not the same, is similar to the Viora V10 System predicate which is cleared for "...Temporary reduction in the appearance of cellulite." Moreover, the newly added indications for use is similar to the reference predicate device, Cellulaze (K123407), indications for use, which is as follows: "Cynosure Cellulaze ™ laser is intended for the improvement in the appearance of cellulite as supported by long-term clinical data (at least 6 months with no observed reduction in treatment benefits up to 9 months of observation)."
The subiect device and the primary predicate devices are radio frequency (RF) based electrosurgical devices. The subject device has similar components and the same energy output as the Profound primary predicate, and minor design changes to the previously cleared console and 25° handpiece do not impact device performance. The added 75º cartridge and associated handpiece have similar technological characteristics as the previously cleared cartridge and handpiece.
The similarities and differences in terms of indications for use and technological characteristics between the subject and predicate devices are summarized in the below side comparison table. To address the differences in the indications for use and technological parameters, a clinical study was performed, as described below in the Performance Data section of this 510(k) Summary.
{5}------------------------------------------------
The clinical data support substantial equivalence of the Profound compared to its predicate devices. The technological differences have also been evaluated in bench testing. Minor software changes to accommodate the expanded technological features have been verified and validated.
| Product | Syneron-Candela Corp.'s<br>Profound System<br>(K161043) | Primaeva Medical, Inc.'s<br>Miratone System<br>(K082391, K080145) | Viora Ltd.'s V10 System<br>(K150035) |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended Use/<br>Indications for Use | The Profound System is<br>indicated for use in<br>dermatologic and general<br>surgical procedures for<br>electrocoagulation and<br>hemostasis. Specifically,<br>the 25° Dermal handpiece<br>and cartridge are used for<br>percutaneous treatment of<br>facial wrinkles, and the 75°<br>SubQ handpiece and<br>cartridge are used to<br>improve the appearance of<br>cellulite in patients with<br>Fitzpatrick skin types I-III as<br>supported by long-term<br>clinical data (6 months). | The Primaeva Medical<br>Miratone System is indicated<br>for use in dermatologic and<br>general surgical procedures<br>for electrocoagulation and<br>hemostasis, and the<br>percutaneous treatment of<br>facial wrinkles. | The Viora V10 system is<br>intended for dermatological<br>procedures. The V-Form<br>Handpiece, with Body-<br>Contour (BC) and Facial-<br>Contour (FC) applicators,<br>is indicated for delivering<br>non-thermal RF combined<br>with massage:<br>• relief of minor muscle<br>aches and pain, relief of<br>muscle spasm,<br>temporary improvement<br>of local blood<br>circulation and<br>• Temporary reduction in<br>the appearance of<br>cellulite. |
| Product Code | PBX, GEI | GEI | PBX, ISA |
| Energy Type | Bipolar fractionated RF | Bipolar fractionated RF | Bipolar RF, Vacuum |
| RF Frequency | 460 +/- 5kHz | 460 +/- 5kHz | 0.8, 1.7, or 2.45 MHz, or<br>combination of all 3<br>frequencies |
| Components | • RF generator with user<br>interface<br>• Reusable electrode<br>insertion<br>device/applicators (25°<br>with cooling plate and 75°)<br>• Single patient use,<br>disposable, 25° and 75°<br>electrode cartridges | • RF generator with user<br>interface<br>• Cooler controller and<br>handpiece/applicator<br>• Reusable electrode<br>insertion device/applicator<br>• Single patient use<br>disposable, 25° electrode<br>cartridge. | • Console (RF generator,<br>user interface, etc.)<br>• Applicators (with cable,<br>connector to console,<br>and vacuum pump; 2<br>available for cellulite<br>indication) |
| Maximum Output<br>Voltage | 84 VRMS | 84 VRMS | Not specified |
| Channels | 25° applicator: 5<br>independent channels<br>(electrode pairs)<br>75° applicator: 7<br>independent channels | 25° applicator: 5<br>independent channels<br>(electrode pairs) | Multi-channel;<br>6 electrodes (V-Form<br>handpiece) |
| Target Temperature<br>Range | 65-75°C +/- 1°C increments | 65-75°C +/- 1°C increments | Not specified |
| Treatment Area<br>Width | 14 mm for the 25° mode (5<br>pairs)<br>20 mm for the 75° mode (7<br>pairs) | 14 mm (5 pairs) | BC applicator: 97 x 83 mm<br>FC applicator: 0-24 mm |
| User Interface | GUI - color LCD display | GUI - color LCD display | Display unit |
| System<br>Dimensions | 125 x 46.5 x 44.5 cm /<br>29.5 x 18.5 x 17.5 inches | 125 x 46.5 x 44.5 cm /<br>29.5 x 18.5 x 17.5 inches | 45 x 35 x 40 cm |
| Product | Syneron-Candela Corp.'s<br>Profound System<br>(K161043) | Primaeva Medical, Inc.'s<br>Miratone System<br>(K082391, K080145) | Viora Ltd.'s V10 System<br>(K150035) |
| Electrical<br>Requirements | 100-240 VAC; 2.5 A; 50-60 Hz; single phase | 100-240 VAC; 2.5 A; 50-60 Hz; single phase | 90-264 VAC; 50-60 Hz;<br>single phase |
| Sterilization | Cartridges are sterilized | Cartridges are sterilized | Not specified |
{6}------------------------------------------------
In summary, minor differences between the subject Profound and the predicates do not present different types of safety or effectiveness questions, since the Profound's energy parameters are similar to or within the range of the predicates and the device operates in the same manner and for the same general intended use as the primary predicates. Further, the device's safety and performance have been confirmed by results of both clinical and non-clinical investigations. Therefore, the subject Profound System has the same intended use and similar indications for use. technological characteristics, and principles of operation as the predicate devices.
### Performance Data:
Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility: Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing for the modified Profound System was conducted by an independent test laboratory in accordance with the applicable standards (IEC 60601-1, Medical electrical equipment, Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance. EN 60601-1-2, Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1-2: General Requirements For Basic Safety and Essential Performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility - Requirements and Tests, and IEC 60601-2-2. Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-2: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of high frequency surgical equipment and high frequency surgical accessories). The Profound System was determined to be in conformance with these standards.
Biocompatibility: The biocompatibility of the Profound device has been established per ISO 10993 guidelines as well as comparison to previously cleared Syneron applicators using the same chrome plating for the same type and duration of patient contact.
Software: Software verification and validation testing was conducted and results were found acceptable for software release.
Bench Testing: Performance testing on the RF generator, 25º Dermal handpiece, and 25º Dermal cartridge was previously conducted and confirmed device performance. Bench testing performed on the new 75º SubQ handpiece and cartridge demonstrated that the modified device performs as intended and device outputs met specifications.
Clinical Data: In support of this 510(k), a single arm, self-controlled, multi-center study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Profound for improving cellulite appearance. The clinical study evaluated 50 treated subjects (100 thighs), all females, across all skin types. Mean age was 44 years and the majority of the subjects were Caucasian. Data demonstrated that the Profound performs as intended when used for this indication. Treatment with the Profound did not lead to any device-related serious adverse events. The mean pain level reported (3.74/10) reflects patient comfort when the procedure is performed as indicated, i.e., with tumescent anesthesia and cold air. Anticipated treatment responses reported immediately after the procedure (e.g., erythema, edema) all completely resolved without medical intervention. The study met the primary endpoint, where 94% of treated thighs demonstrated improvement in cellulite
{7}------------------------------------------------
appearance as assessed by blinded review at 3 months following treatment when considering improvement in dimples and/or undulation irregularities. When considering improvement in each cellulite feature separately, 86% of the treated thighs with dimples at baseline) showed improvement in dimples, and 76% of the thighs had undulation at baseline) showed improvement in undulation irregularities. Per subject results were 88% (37/42) of the treated subjects showed improvement in both thighs in dimples and/or undulation at 3 months follow up. When considering each cellulite feature separately, 71% of the treated subjects showed improvement in dimples in both thighs, and 64% showed improvement in undulation irreqularities in both thighs.
Further, additional assessments of treatment effectiveness were also favorable. These included blinded review at 6 months post-treatment, where improvement in cellulite appearance was maintained at 6 months follow up; 93% (78/84) of the treated thighs (per-subject success (both thighs) of 86%) showed improvement in cellulite appearance at 6 months post-treatment compared to baseline based on blinded review. In addition, assessments also included, openlabel assessments by investigators and patients of the severity of cellulitic features, overall improvement in cellulite appearance, and satisfaction with treatment at 1, 3, and 6 months following treatment. Therefore, the study results for the subject device did not present any different types of safety or effectiveness questions as compared to the predicates. The study design and results are summarized in the table below.
| Study<br>Design | Prospective, single-arm, self-controlled, multicenter clinical study |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Sample size | 50 patients (100 thighs) were treated across 4 U.S. sites. |
| Principal<br>Eligibility<br>Criteria | Seeking treatment of cellulite in the upper thighs areas Presenting with cellulite stage II or III as graded using the Nurnberger-<br>Muller scale classification Healthy females ages 25 to 60 years of age Willing to receive the proposed Profound treatment and comply with the<br>follow-up protocol |
| Follow up<br>intervals | 4 follow-up visits: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months following treatment. |
| Endpoints | <b>Primary:</b> The study primary endpoint was achieved when 80% of thighs showed<br>at least 1 point level of improvement in the appearance of cellulite at 3 month<br>follow-up visit relative to baseline photos based on blinded review.<br><br><b>Secondary:</b> Cellulite appearance improvement by blinded evaluators at 6 months<br>post treatment visit. Cellulite appearance improvement by study investigators. Investigator improvement and satisfaction assessments. Subject improvement and satisfaction assessments. |
{8}------------------------------------------------
| Effectiveness<br>Results | Primary: Met endpoint; 94% (79/84) of the treated thighs based on observed<br>data had an improvement in cellulite appearance per blinded review. 88%<br>(37/42) of the treated subjects showed improvement in both thighs in dimples<br>and/or undulation at 3 months follow up. |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Secondary:<br>Improvement in cellulite appearance was maintained at 6 months follow<br>up; 93% (78/84) of the treated thighs (per-subject success (both thighs)<br>of 86%) showed improvement in cellulite appearance at 6 months post-<br>treatment compared to baseline based on blinded review.<br>Investigator cellulite reduction assessment results demonstrated<br>progressively improved treatment effects for the large majority of thighs<br>at 3 and 6 months following treatment.<br>Cellulite improvement per the Nurnberger-Muller scale also<br>demonstrated increasing levels of improvement throughout the study<br>(majority of the thighs showed improvement at 3 and 6 months following<br>treatment).<br>Nearly all of the thighs showed improvement at 1 month following<br>treatment and all thighs showed improvement at both 3 and 6 months<br>following treatment.<br>Investigator satisfaction increased gradually along the study course and<br>was demonstrated for the majority of the subjects at 3 and 6 month<br>follow up.<br>Subject improvement results showed moderate to excellent reduction for<br>most of the thighs at 3 and 6 month follow up.<br>Subject satisfaction was reported by a majority of subjects at 3 and 6<br>month follow-up visits. |
| Safety<br>Results | Of the 50 total subjects, only 3 subjects reported a total of 3 adverse events.<br>None were serious and each event resolved during the study. Anticipated<br>treatment-associated responses experienced during the first week following<br>treatment were also reported. None of the immediate responses were observed<br>at the next visit (i.e., 1 month follow-up visit). |
The distribution of numbers of insertions in the study suggested that most treatments were covered by a range of up to 300 insertions per thigh, or up to a maximum treatment density of 1.333. No clear dose-response relationship was observed, and treatment beyond these levels has not been shown to improve outcomes and is not recommended.
# Conclusions:
Testing of the Profound System demonstrated that the device performs as intended with a favorable safety profile. The non-clinical data further support device safety. Verification and validation testing of the modified software demonstrates that the device performs as intended. Thus, the Profound System is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.