Valleylab REM Polyhesive Infant Patient Return Electrode
K160290 · Covidien, LLC · GEI · May 19, 2016 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K160290
Device Name
Valleylab REM Polyhesive Infant Patient Return Electrode
Applicant
Covidien, LLC
Product Code
GEI · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
May 19, 2016
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4400
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Pediatric
Indications for Use
The REM Polyhesive Infant Patient Return Electrode is a single use, non-sterile dispersive electrode with a preattached cord. The electrode adheres to the patient over its entire surface. Its complete the electrosurgical circuit between the generator, the active electrode, and the patient. The product is used for general monopoloar electrosurgery on newborns, infants, and children weighing between approximately 6 and 30 1b.
Device Story
Non-sterile, single-use dispersive electrode; provides low-impedance return path for RF current during monopolar electrosurgery. Device consists of conductive resin, non-conductive adhesive border, two conductive metal foil sheets, and integral cord. Used in clinical settings (OR) by surgeons/nurses. Compatible with Covidien generators featuring Return Electrode Monitoring (REM) system; REM technology monitors contact quality between electrode and patient skin to prevent unintended RF burns. Larger surface area compared to neonatal predicate to accommodate higher current requirements for larger pediatric patients. Benefits patient by ensuring safe electrical circuit completion and minimizing risk of thermal injury.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance verified against IEC 60601-1:2005, IEC 60601-2-2:2009, and IEC 60601-1-2:2007/2014. Biocompatibility testing (cytotoxicity, sensitization, primary skin irritation) per ISO 10993-1:2009 and FDA G95-1. Shelf life verified via thermal performance and contact impedance testing per IEC 60601-2-2:2009.
Technological Characteristics
Non-sterile, single-use dispersive electrode. Materials: conductive gel (polymer matrix, water, electrolytes), pressure-sensitive adhesive, conductive foil-polymer laminate, cross-linked foam backing. Features two-piece foil design for REM system compatibility. Dimensions vary by cord length (9ft or 15ft). Connectivity: wired to electrosurgical generator.
Indications for Use
Indicated for newborns, infants, and children weighing approximately 6 to 30 lbs (2.7 - 13.6 kg) undergoing general monopolar electrosurgery.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories is a device intended to remove tissue and control bleeding by use of high-frequency electrical current.
Predicate Devices
Valleylab™ REM Polyhesive™ Neonatal Patient Return Electrode (K994428)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus symbol, which is a staff with two snakes coiled around it, often used as a symbol of medicine. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the caduceus symbol.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
May 19, 2016
Covidien LLC Ms. Nancy Sauer Principal Regulatory Affairs Specialist 5920 Longbow Drive Boulder, CO 80301
Re: K160290
Trade/Device Name: Valleylab™ REM Polyhesive™ Infant Patient Return Electrode Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4400 Regulation Name: Electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device & accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GEI Dated: April 19, 2016 Received: April 21, 2016
Dear Ms. Sauer:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{1}------------------------------------------------
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638 2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Jennifer R. Stevenson -A
For Binita S. Ashar, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.S. Director Division of Surgical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K160290
Device Name
Valleylab REM Polyhesive Infant Patient Return Electrode
Indications for Use (Describe)
The REM Polyhesive Infant Patient Return Electrode is a single use, non-sterile dispersive electrode with a preattached cord. The electrode adheres to the patient over its entire surface. Its complete the electrosurgical circuit between the generator, the active electrode, and the patient.
The product is used for general monopoloar electrosurgery on newborns, infants, and children weighing between approximately 6 and 30 1b.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> <svg class="bi bi-check-square-fill" fill="currentColor" height="1em" viewbox="0 0 16 16" width="1em" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <path d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v12a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h12a2 2 0 0 0 2-2V2a2 2 0 0 0-2-2H2zm10.03 4.97a.75.75 0 0 0-1.08.022L7.477 9.417 5.384 7.323a.75.75 0 0 0-1.06 1.06L6.97 11.03a.75.75 0 0 0 1.079-.02l3.992-4.99a.75.75 0 0 0-.01-1.05z" fill-rule="evenodd"></path> </svg> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> </div> | <div> <span> <svg class="bi bi-square" fill="currentColor" height="1em" viewbox="0 0 16 16" width="1em" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <path d="M14 1H2a1 1 0 0 0-1 1v12a1 1 0 0 0 1 1h12a1 1 0 0 0 1-1V2a1 1 0 0 0-1-1zM2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v12a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h12a2 2 0 0 0 2-2V2a2 2 0 0 0-2-2H2z" fill-rule="evenodd"></path> </svg> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> </div> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Number: K160290
Date summary prepared: 5/18/2016
#### 510(k) Submitter/Holder
Covidien 5920 Longbow Drive Boulder, CO 80301
#### Contact
Nancy Sauer Principal Regulatory Affairs Specialist Telephone: 303-581-6791 Fax: 303-530-6313 Email: nancy.k.sauer@medtronic.com
#### Name of Device
| Trade Name: | Valleylab™™ REM Polyhesive™™ Infant Patient Return Electrode |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Catalog Numbers: | E7510-25, E5710-25DB |
| Common Name: | Patient Return Electrode |
| Classification Name: | Electrosurgical device, cutting, coagulation, and accessories |
| Regulation Number: | 21CFR 878.4400 |
| Product Code: | GEI |
#### Predicate Device
The primary predicate device for this submission is the Valleylab™ REM Polyhesive™ Neonatal Patient Return Electrode. This device was cleared for marketing under 510(k) K994428.
## Device Description
The Valleylab™ REM Polyhesive™ Infant Patient Return Electrodes are part of a family of patient return electrodes. They are non-sterile, single-use devices used in monopolar surgery to complete the electrical circuit with the generator. Providing a low-impedance path back to the generator through the return electrode helps to prevent unintended RF burns. The infant return electrodes are designed to be compatible with the return electrode monitoring function of compatible Covidien generators.
There are two separate catalog numbers for the infant Polyhesive™ return electrodes. The two models differ only with regard to the length of the cord connecting the return electrode to the generator. One has a 9-foot cord and the other has a 15-foot cord.
#### Indications for Use
The REM Polyhesive Infant Patient Return Electrode is a single use, non-sterile dispersive electrode with a preattached cord. The electrode adheres to the patient over its entire surface. Its purpose is to complete the electrosurgical circuit between the generator, the active electrode, and the patient.
The product is used for general monopoloar electrosurgery on newborns, infants, and children weighing between approximately 6 and 30 lb.
#### Technological Characteristics
This is a non-sterile single-use device that includes the following features:
{4}------------------------------------------------
- . Conductive resin that adheres to the patient's skin and conducts electrical current away from the patient's body.
- . Non-conductive adhesive border that provides a stronger adhesive bond and helps to prevent fluid ingress.
- . Two separate pieces of conductive metal foil. The presence of two separate foil sheets is necessary for the Covidien Return Electrode Monitoring (REM) system in the Covidien generators.
- . An integral cord that conducts the current from the conductive metal foil back to the generator.
#### Comparison to the Predicate Device
#### Similarities
- . Same general intended use
- Both are indicated for use in pediatric populations, primarily newborns and infants .
- Same materials and design
- Both use the Covidien REM technology for contact quality monitoring.
#### Differences
The indicated patient weight range is higher for the Valleylab™ REM Polyhesive™ Infant Patient Return Electrode. It is indicated for use in patients weighing between 6 and 30 pounds (2.7 - 13.6 kg), whereas the predicate device is indicated for use in patients weighing between 1 and 6 pounds. Because return electrodes intended for larger pediatric patients are expected to carry more current, the infant return electrode has a larger surface area than the neonatal return electrode.
The impact of these differences was evaluated through testing to show that the Valleylab™ REM Polyhesive™ Infant Patient Return Electrode meets thermal performance requirements for return electrodes indicated for use on patients weighing between 5 and 15 kg.
## Sterilization
The Valleylab™ REM Polyhesive™ Infant Patient Return Electrodes are not sterile. Because the products are not delivered in sterile form, the primary packaging is not intended to act as a sterile barrier.
## Shelf Life
The packaged Valleylab™ REM Polyhesive™ Infant Return Electrodes have a shelf life of two years. The suitability of this shelf life has been verified in accordance with sub-clause 201.15.101.8 of IEC 60601-2-2: 2009, which requires that the products be aged to within 30 days of their expiration date prior to conducting thermal performance and contact impedance testing.
The primary packaging has also been evaluated to verify the suitability of the two year shelf life. The primary packaging remains intact with no tears, holes, or other degradation and the seal remains intact (seal width maintained and no visual evidence of seal degradation).
#### Biocompatibility
The products have been evaluated for biocompatibility in accordance with ISO 10993-1: 2009 and the FDA Blue Book Memorandum G95-1. Per the standard, patient return electrodes are classified as intact skin contacting devices with limited duration (< 24 hours) of contact.
The direct patient contact materials are:
- . Conductive gel (adhesive polymer matrix, water, electrolytes, blue colorant, and preservative)
- . Pressure-sensitive adhesive border
- Silicone-coated paper (can be used to cover adhesive border at the surgeon's discretion) ●
{5}------------------------------------------------
Two non-patient contacting materials were included in testing because of their potential for affecting the direct patient contact materials.
- Conductive foil-polymer laminate .
- Cross-linked foam backing
Production-representative devices made of these materials were subjected to cytotoxicity, sensitization, and primary skin irritation tests. The devices met all of the acceptance criteria for these tests.
# Performance
Appropriate performance of the Valleylab™ REM Polyhesive™ Infant Patient Return Electrode was demonstrated by showing that the device meets applicable clauses in the following standards:
IEC 60601-1: 2005, Medical electrical equipment – Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance
IEC 60601-2-2: 2009. Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-2: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of high frequency surgical equipment and high frequency surgical accessories
IEC 60601-1-2: 2007 and 2014, Medical Electrical Equipment – Part 1-2: General requirements for safety – Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic compatibility – Requirements and Tests.
# Conclusion
The comparison of device characteristics and the review of the performance data support the conclusion that the Valleylab™ REM Polyhesive™ Infant Patient Return Electrode is substantially equivalent to the Valleylab™ REM Polyhesive™ Neonatal Patient Return Electrode.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.