K153168 · Medical Instrument Development Laboratories · HQE · Apr 29, 2016 · Ophthalmic
Device Facts
Record ID
K153168
Device Name
Bi-Blade Vitrectomy Cutter
Applicant
Medical Instrument Development Laboratories
Product Code
HQE · Ophthalmic
Decision Date
Apr 29, 2016
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 886.4150
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K153168 · Apr 29, 2016
Bi-Blade Vitrectomy Cutter
Medical Instrument Development Laboratories
Peer-reviewed clinical literature (Wu, J., Seregard, S., & Algvere, P.V. (2006). Photochemical damage of the retina. Survey of Ophthalmology, 51(5), 461–481)
Clinical literature was used to establish the safety threshold for heat generation (maximum temperature increase) at the probe tip during bench testing.
Literature review; Safety threshold; Heat generation
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Wu, J., Seregard, S., & Algvere, P.V. (2006). Photochemical damage of the retina; Literature review; Follow-up/Duration: Not applicable; Study Period: Not applicable
Not applicable; Sample Size: Not applicable; Number of Sites: Not applicable
Not applicable for this study
Retinal safety thresholds regarding temperature increase
Indications for Use
The UVE and the MID Labs Bi-Blade Vitrectomy Cutter labeled for use with the UVE are used to remove vitreous and intraocular tissue. The UVE can only be used with the MID Labs Bi-Blade Vitrectomy Cutter. The UVE is used in conjunction with ophthalmic surgical equipment as a Host system (typically phacoemulsification or vitreoretinal surgical equipment).
Device Story
Pneumatically actuated vitrectomy cutter; accessory to Ultimate Vit Enhancer (UVE) console. Input: pneumatic pressure pulses from host surgical system. Mechanism: guillotine-style cutting via needle port; features dual-port design allowing continuous aspiration during both extended and retracted cutter positions; performs two cuts per operating cycle. Output: physical removal of vitreous/intraocular tissue. Used in OR by ophthalmic surgeons. Benefit: reduced flow resistance and decreased flow interruption compared to single-port cutters; enables continuous aspiration throughout cutting cycle.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Evaluated heat generation (max 3°C increase), metal flaking (no particles >0.45 microns detected), fluid dynamics (displacement in porcine vitreous comparable to predicate), and aspiration flow rates (demonstrated reduced flow resistance and continuous aspiration across all gauges 20G-27G and cut rates 1000-8000 cpm).
Technological Characteristics
Stainless steel construction; pneumatically actuated; guillotine cutting mechanism; dual side-port configuration; 20G, 23G, 25G, and 27G needle sizes; spring return; sterilized via cobalt 60 gamma radiation; packaged in double Tyvek pouch.
Indications for Use
Indicated for removal of vitreous and intraocular tissue during ophthalmic surgery. Used in conjunction with phacoemulsification or vitreoretinal surgical host systems.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A vitreous aspiration and cutting instrument is an electrically powered device, which may use ultrasound, intended to remove vitreous matter from the vitreous cavity or remove a crystalline lens.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is phacofragmentation unit replacement tubing, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 886.9.
Predicate Devices
Ultimate Vit Enhancer (UVE) and Accessories (K102222)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other.
April 29, 2016
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Medical Instrument Development Laboratories % Ms. Brenda Balletto VP of Regulatory and Quality 557 McCormick Street San Leandro, California 94577
Re: K153168
Trade/Device Name: Bi-Blade Vitrectomy Cutter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 886.4150 Regulation Name: Vitreous Aspiration and Cutting Instrument Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HOE Dated: April 4, 2016 Received: April 5, 2016
Dear Ms. Balletto:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{1}------------------------------------------------
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification"
(21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Kesia Alexander
for Malvina B. Eydelman, M.D. Director Division of Ophthalmic and Ear, Nose and Throat Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K153168
Device Name Bi-Blade Vitrectomy Cutter
Indications for Use (Describe)
The UVE and MID Labs Bi-Blade Vitrectomy Cutter labeled for use with the UVE are used to remove vitreous and intraocular tissue. The UVE can only be used with the MID Labs Bi-Blade Vitrectomy Cutter. The UVE is used in conjunction with ophthalmic surgical equipment as a Host system (typically phacoemulsification or vitreoretinal surgical equipment).
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-size: 10pt;">☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)</span> | ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Section 8 -510(k) Summary
#### I. General Information
### Submitter:
Medical Instrument Development Laboratories, Inc. (MID Labs) 557 McCormick Street San Leandro, CA 94577
Contact Persons:
Brenda Balletto bballetto@midlabs.com 510-357-3952 x 140
Kathy Maynor Kmaynor77@gmail.com 352-586-3113
April 22, 2016 Summary Preparation Date:
#### II. Names
Trade Name: Common name: Classification Name: Bi-Blade™ Vitrectomy Cutter Vitrectomy Device Vitreous Aspiration & Cutting Instrument (86 HQE, 21 CFR 886.4150)
#### Predicate Devices III.
- K102222 – Ultimate Vit Enhancer (UVE) and Accessories
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### IV. Product Description
The Ultimate Vit Enhancer is a standalone console box with accessories, designed to be used in conjunction with a standard vitrectomy machine (Host system) for vitreous cutting. The host system can be any variety of commercially available devices capable of operating a vitreous cutter. The UVE is used with the MID Labs Vitreous Cutter labeled for use with the UVE.
The Ultimate Vit Enhancer (with accessories) was previously cleared via K102222.
The Vitrectomy Cutter, one of the accessories for the Ultimate Vit Enhancer and the subject of this 510(k), is a pneumatically actuated device, which supports aspiration and guillotine-style cutting functions for the purpose of removing vitreous and/or other tissues from the eye during surgery.
This 510(k) describes dimensional changes to the cutter. Specifically, a second port opening was added, and this created a second cutting edge. As the cutter moves from its retracted position to its extended position, any material in the port is cut by the first cutting edge in cooperation with the distal side of the needle port, just as in the conventional vitrectomy cutter. Unlike the conventional vitrectomy cutter, aspiration is able to continue through the opening in the side of the cutter while the cutter is in the extended position, drawing more material into the port. As the cutter moves from the extended position to the retracted position, this material is cut by the second cutting edge in cooperation with the proximal side of the needle port. Thus, there are two cuts made during a single operating cycle, as opposed to one cut for the conventional vitrectomy cutter.
#### V. Indications for Use
Indications for Use (same as K102222):
The UVE and the MID Labs Bi-Blade™ Vitrectomy Cutter labeled for use with the UVE are used to remove vitreous and intraocular tissue. The UVE can only be used with the MID Labs Bi-Blade™ Vitrectomy Cutter. The UVE is used in conjunction with ophthalmic surgical equipment as a Host system (typically phacoemulsification or vitreoretinal surgical equipment).
#### VI. Summary of Technological Characteristics
The technological characteristics of the MID Labs Bi-Blade™ vitrectomy cutter are substantially equivalent to those of the predicate device.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Characteristic | Proposed Bi-Blade™ Vitreous Cutter | K102222 UVE Ultimate Vit Enhancer and Accessories |
|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Product Code | 86- Ophthalmic<br>Instrument, Vitreous<br>Aspiration And Cutting, Ac-Powered | 86- Ophthalmic<br>Instrument, Vitreous Aspiration And Cutting, Ac- Powered |
| Regulation | • HQE, 21 CFR 886.4150 | • HQE, 21 CFR 886.4150 |
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | The UVE and the MID Labs Vitreous Cutter labeled for use with the UVE are used to remove vitreous and intraocular tissue. The UVE can only be used with the MID Labs Vitreous Cutter. The UVE is used in conjunction with ophthalmic surgical equipment as a Host system (typically phacoemulsification or vitreoretinal surgical equipment). | The UVE and the MID Labs Vitreous Cutter labeled for use with the UVE are used to remove vitreous and intraocular tissue. The UVE can only be used with the MID Labs Vitreous Cutter. The UVE is used in conjunction with ophthalmic surgical equipment as a Host system (typically phacoemulsification or vitreoretinal surgical equipment). |
| Power source for cutter activation | Pneumatic pressure pulse | Pneumatic pressure pulse |
| Frequency of cutter activation | Up to 8000 pulses per minute | Up to 8000 pulses per minute |
| Cutting action format | Guillotine | Guillotine |
| Cutter return mechanism | Spring return | Spring return |
| Probe needle size | 20 gauge or smaller | 20 gauge or smaller |
| Cutting port format | Side port, two | Side port, one |
| Characteristic | Proposed Bi-Blade™ Vitreous<br>Cutter | K102222 UVE Ultimate Vit<br>Enhancer and Accessories |
| Aspiration<br>channel | Through the cutter tubing<br>cannula | Through the cutter tubing<br>cannula |
| Patient contact<br>material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Sterile product<br>packaging and<br>sterility method | Packaged in double Tyvek<br>pouch, sterilized by cobalt 60<br>gamma radiation | Packaged in double Tyvek<br>pouch, sterilized by cobalt 60<br>gamma radiation |
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### Performance Data VII.
Testing and validations have demonstrated that the functional requirements and specifications have been met. The following tests were conducted:
- Heat Generation: Testing was conducted to measure heat generation in the vitreous cutter . operated at a range of cut rates and on of all four gauges of cutters (20G, 23G, 25G, and 27G). The maximum temperature increase at the probe tip should not be greater than 10°C based on literature review: (Wu, J., Seregard, S., & Algvere, P.V. (2006). Photochemical damage of the retina. Survey of Ophthalmology, 51(5), 461–481). Testing showed that the maximum temperature increase was 3°C, which is well below the maximum limit.
- Metal Flaking: Testing was performed to evaluate the potential for metal flaking in the cut . range from 1500 to 8000 cpm and to verify conformance to the endurance specification for all gauges of vitrectomy Bi-Blade cutters (20G, 23G, 25G, and 27G). Acceptance criteria for the testing was that no stainless steel particle originating from the probe's cutter or needle, larger than 0.45 microns, should be present on the filter after 20 minutes of continuous use. The vitreous cutter was actuated in purified water as specified. The water was filtered and the filter examined microscopically. During testing, no stainless steel metal flakes were produced during 20 minutes of operation for all gauges tested throughout all cut rates.
- Fluid Dynamics: Testing was conducted to characterize fluid dynamic characteristics of the Bi-Blade™ Vitrectomy Cutter throughout the cutting range of 1500 to 8000 cpm, to ensure that these characteristics would not adversely affect nearby sensitive ocular structures. Testing was performed on all gauges of the Bi-Blade vitrectomy cutter (20G, 23G, 25G, and 27G). Fluid Dynamics were evaluated by measuring displacement of a marker in porcine vitreous at a range of cut rates. Video footage was reviewed and the displacement of the lens from its initial starting position to its maximum displacement was assessed using a defined unit of measurement. Testing showed that the fluid dynamics of the Bi-Blade™ vitrectomy cutter for all gauges is similar to the FDA cleared 23 gauge predicate cutter.
- Aspiration Flow Rates: Testing was conducted to characterize aspiration flow rate ● characteristics of the Bi-Blade™ Vitrectomy Cutter to ensure that the Bi-Blade has an equal to
{7}------------------------------------------------
or improved aspiration flow rate compared to the MID Labs previous FDA cleared predicate vitreous cutters. Testing was performed over the entire range of cutter sizes (20G, 23G, 25G, and 27G) and the entire range of cutting rate (1000 to 8000 cpm). Results of testing demonstrate that the Bi-Blade Vitrectomy Cutter, with its second open port, has less flow resistance per duty cycle and thus decreased flow interruption. The flow rate in saline fluid of the Bi-Blade cutter is relatively independent of the cutting rate. The Bi-Blade cutter is able to provide continuous aspiration even when the cutter is fully closed.
Acceptance requirements as outlined in the testing were met. Test data and documentation were submitted to support system function. Therefore, the Bi-Blade™ device is as safe, as effective, and performs as well or better than the predicate device.
## VIII. Safety and Effectiveness Information
The review of the indications for use and technical characteristics provided demonstrates that the MID Labs Bi-Blade™ vitrectomy cutter is substantially equivalent to the predicate device and is safe and effective for use for the various indications for use stated.
#### IX. Conclusion
The MID Labs Bi-Blade™ vitrectomy cutter was found to be substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
The MID Labs Bi-Blade™ vitrectomy cutter shares identical indications for use, similar design features and functional features with, and thus are substantially equivalent to, the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.