K152150 · Intervalve, Inc. · OZT · Dec 18, 2015 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K152150
Device Name
V8 Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Catheter
Applicant
Intervalve, Inc.
Product Code
OZT · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Dec 18, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1255
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The V8 Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Catheter is intended to be used to dilate aortic valve tissue.
Device Story
V8 Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Catheter is a percutaneous, guidewire-delivered device featuring an hour-glass shaped dilatation balloon. Used in clinical settings by physicians to treat aortic stenosis; catheter is inserted via femoral artery introducer sheath and advanced retrograde to the aortic valve. Balloon inflation dilates stenotic valve leaflets to increase valve opening dimensions and systemic blood flow. Hour-glass design minimizes over-dilatation of the aortic annulus while the bulbous proximal segment maximizes leaflet opening. Device also functions as pre- or post-dilatation tool for self-expanding transcatheter heart valves. Output is mechanical dilation of valve tissue; clinical benefit is improved leaflet mobility and blood flow.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance evaluation included bond tensile strength, balloon rated burst pressure, and balloon compliance (diameter vs. pressure) to verify the impact of the modified balloon bulb length.
Technological Characteristics
Hour-glass shaped balloon made of clear semi-compliant polymeric material. Available in four sizes (waist/bulb diameters 17/22, 19/24, 21/26, 23/28 mm). 110 cm length; 12F introducer sheath compatible; 0.035" guidewire compatible. Radiopaque platinum iridium marker bands at waist and balloon shoulders. Single-use; sterilized; heat-sealed Tyvek packaging.
Indications for Use
Indicated for Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in patients requiring dilation of stenotic aortic valve tissue.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A balloon aortic valvuloplasty catheter is a catheter with a balloon at the distal end of the shaft, which is intended to treat stenosis in the aortic valve when the balloon is expanded.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(2) Sterility and shelf life testing must demonstrate the sterility of patient-contacting components and the shelf life of these components.
(3) Non-clinical performance evaluation must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use, including device delivery, inflation, deflation, and removal.
(4) In vivo evaluation of the device must demonstrate device performance, including the ability of the device to treat aortic stenosis.
(5) Labeling must include a detailed summary of the device-related and procedure-related complications pertinent to the use of the device.
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act, the NuMED NuCLEUS and NuCLEUS-X BAV Catheters are subject to the following special controls:
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized caduceus symbol, which is a staff with two snakes coiled around it, overlaid on three human profiles facing right. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the symbol.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
December 18, 2015
InterValve, Inc. c/o Ming Chew Regulatory Consultant Libra Medical Inc. 8401 73rd Avenue North, Suite 63 Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55428
Re: K152150
Trade/Device Name: V8 Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1255 Regulation Name: Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OZT Dated: November 12, 2015 Received: November 13, 2015
Dear Mr. Chew:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device
{1}------------------------------------------------
related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely vours.
M.A. Hilleman
for
for Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K152150
### Device Name
V8 Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Catheter
### Indications for Use (Describe)
The V8 Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Catheter is indicated for Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 1. 510(K) SUMMARY
#### ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION 1.1. Date of Summary Preparation: December 16, 2015
## 1.1.1. Contact Information
| Submitter/Manufacturer | Mark Ungs<br>InterValve, Inc.<br>2445 Xenium Lane<br>Plymouth, MN 55441<br>Phone: (612) 599-1795<br>Fax: 763-657-7055<br>Email: mark@intervalveinc.com |
|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Primary Submission Contact Ming Cheng Chew Regulatory Consultant, Libra Medical Inc. 8401 73rd Ave North, Suite 63 Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 Phone: 763-232-3701 Fax: 763-477-6357 Email: mcchew@libramed.com
| Secondary Submission Contact | Sew-Wah Tay, PhD<br>Regulatory Consultant,<br>Libra Medical Inc.<br>8401 73rd Ave North, Suite 63<br>Brooklyn Park, MN 55428<br>Phone: 612-801-6782<br>Fax: 763-477-6357<br>Email: swtay@libramed.com |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
## 1.1.2. Device Information
| Trade Name | V8 |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Common Name | Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Catheter |
| Classification Name | Catheter, Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty |
| Classification Regulation | 870.1255 |
| Class | II |
| Panel | Cardiovascular |
| Product Code | OZT |
| FDA Documents Related to Modified Device | None |
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### 1.2. PREDICATE DEVICE
The modified device is substantially equivalent to the Valve V8 Transluminal BAV Catheter (K150343).
#### 1.3. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The V8 Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Catheter features an hour glass shaped dilatation balloon on the distal end of a catheter. The catheter is inserted through a percutaneous entry site into the common femoral artery via an introducer sheath and advanced retrograde to the aortic valve. The catheter is always delivered over a guidewire. The balloon is then inflated to dilate the stenotic aortic valve leaflets in an effort to increase valve opening dimensions and systemic blood flow by improving leaflet mobility. The hour glass shaped balloon with the undersized waist segment is intended to minimize over-dilatation of the valve annulus while allowing the full dilation of the valve leaflet. The bulbous proximal balloon segment is appropriately sized for the patient's aortic root dimensions to maximize valve leaflet opening.
The V8 Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Catheter can be used as both a pre-dilatation and postdilatation device for self-expanding transcatheter heart valves.
#### 1.4. INTENDED USE
The V8 Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Catheter is intended to be used to dilate aortic valve tissue. There is no change in intended use from the V8 predicate device.
#### INDICATIONS FOR USE 1.5.
The V8 Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Catheter is indicated for Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty.
#### 1.6. TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The V8 balloon is made of clear semi-compliant polymeric material. The balloon is available in four sizes (waist/bulb diameters of 17/22 mm, 19/24 mm, 21/26 mm and 23/28 mm). The waist of the hour glass balloon is sized such that it is smaller than the bulb diameter up to the rated burst pressure. The V8 balloon is intended to provide a means for dilation of stenotic aortic valve tissue while minimizing dilation of the aortic annulus by virtue of its hour glass shape. The catheter is currently available in a 110 cm length and is compatible with a 12F introducer sheath. It is introduced through the femoral artery via the introducer sheath and tracked over a 0.035" wire. The catheter's inner shaft beneath the balloon is marked with radiopaque platinum iridium marker bands, two at the center of the waist, and one each at the outside edges of the proximal and distal balloon shoulders. The catheter is packaged in a heat sealed Tyvek pouch and provided sterilized. It is intended for single use only. These characteristics are identical to the predicate V8 device.
#### 1.7. COMPARISON TO PREDICATE DEVICE
In comparison to the predicate device, the balloon bulb length has been reduced from 10mm to 8mm. All other technological characteristics remain the same.
#### 1.8. PERFORMANCE DATA
Design verification was repeated because the balloon bulb length was modified.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Special Control Requirement | Evidence of Conformity |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| The device should be demonstrated to be<br>biocompatible. | The proposed change does not affect the<br>biocompatibility of the device. The<br>biocompatibility test data were provided in the<br>K123111 submission. There were no new<br>materials added. |
| Sterility and shelf life testing should<br>demonstrate the sterility of patient contacting<br>components and the shelf-life of these<br>components. | The sterile packaging and shelf carton are<br>identical to the predicate V8 device. The worst<br>case device is identical to the predicate device<br>because it is larger with more material to<br>sterilize. Therefore the sterility data provided<br>previously is applicable. The sterilization<br>validation test results provided in the<br>510(k) notification K123111 is applicable to<br>this device. |
| | Shelf life testing was not repeated because the<br>design changes did not affect the validity of the<br>shelf life testing done with the predicate V8<br>device. The material and manufacture of the<br>device remains the same as the predicate. Shelf<br>life testing data is provided in the K133607<br>submission. |
| Non-clinical performance evaluation of the<br>device should demonstrate substantial<br>equivalence in terms of safety and<br>effectiveness for device delivery, inflation,<br>deflation, and removal. | See below for summary of non-clinical<br>performance tests. |
| In vivo evaluation of the device should<br>demonstrate device performance, including the<br>ability of the device to treat aortic stenosis. | The shape of the device has not changed and<br>the principles of operation are also the same.<br>The device dimensions are similar to the<br>predicate device submitted in 510(k)<br>notification K150343. |
| Labeling must include a detailed summary of<br>the device-related and procedure-related<br>complications pertinent to use of the device. | The IFU contains "Potential Complications,<br>Outcomes, Adverse Events" section. |
# Table 1-1: Special Controls
The following testing was performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate device:
- Bond tensile strength .
- Balloon rated burst pressure ●
- Balloon compliance (diameter vs. pressure) ●
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE 1.9.
The V8 device covered by this submission is substantially equivalent to the V8 predicate device. The device intended use has not changed and the design principles are the same. There has been no change to the materials or manufacture of the balloon.
The V8 device covered by this submission has the same intended use and the same technological characteristics as the previously cleared V8 predicate device. The differences between this device and the V8 predicate do not raise new questions of safety or efficacy.
#### 1.10. CONCLUSION
The modified V8 Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Catheter is substantially equivalent to the predicate device (K150343).
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.