K151688 · bioMerieux, Inc. · JSO · Mar 11, 2016 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K151688
Device Name
chromID MRSA
Applicant
bioMerieux, Inc.
Product Code
JSO · Microbiology
Decision Date
Mar 11, 2016
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.1700
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
chromID™ MRSA agar is a selective and differential chromogenic medium for: A. The qualitative detection of nasal colonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), to aid in the prevention and control of MRSA in healthcare settings. The test is performed on anterior nares swab specimens from patients and healthcare workers to screen for MRSA colonization. chromID™ MRSA when used to detect nasal colonization is not intended to diagnose, guide, or monitor therapy for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin. B. The qualitative detection of MRSA from skin and skin structure infections. chromID™ MRSA is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory tests and clinical data available to aid in the identification and diagnosis of MRSA infections. Concomitant cultures for skin and skin structure infections are necessary to recover organisms for further microbiological susceptibility testing or epidemiological typing. A negative result does not preclude MRSA infection. chromID™ MRSA is not intended to monitor treatment for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin.
Device Story
chromID™ MRSA is a selective/differential chromogenic culture medium; utilizes nutrient agar base with peptones, antibiotics (e.g., cefoxitin), and α-glucosidase chromogenic substrate. Used in clinical laboratories; manual operation. Input: anterior nares swabs or skin/skin structure infection specimens. Principle: α-glucosidase produced by S. aureus cleaves chromogenic substrate, producing green colonies; antibiotics inhibit non-Staphylococcus bacteria and yeasts. Output: visual identification of green colonies indicating MRSA presence. Healthcare providers use results alongside clinical data to aid MRSA identification/diagnosis; negative results do not preclude infection. Benefits: facilitates rapid screening/identification of MRSA to support infection control and clinical management.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study evaluated 680 valid skin/skin structure infection (SSSI) specimens across four sites. Compared to reference culture method (TSB enrichment followed by BAP subculture). Sensitivity 93.8% (95% CI: 89.2-96.5%); Specificity 97.4% (95% CI: 95.6-98.5%). Analytical studies included reproducibility (100%), reactivity with mecA/mecC strains, and interference testing. Bench testing only for non-clinical aspects.
Technological Characteristics
Selective chromogenic agar medium; contains antibiotic mixture for inhibition of non-Staphylococcus species and yeasts. Identification via chromogenic substrate cleavage by S. aureus (green colonies). Manual reading; aerobic incubation at 35-37°C. Standalone diagnostic medium.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of MRSA nasal colonization in patients and healthcare workers, and for detection of MRSA from skin and skin structure infections. Not for diagnosing, guiding, or monitoring MRSA therapy or determining methicillin susceptibility.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A culture medium for antimicrobial susceptibility tests is a device intended for medical purposes that consists of any medium capable of supporting the growth of many of the bacterial pathogens that are subject to antimicrobial susceptibility tests. The medium should be free of components known to be antagonistic to the common agents for which susceptibility tests are performed in the treatment of disease.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K151688
B. Purpose for Submission:
To obtain a substantial equivalence determination for chromID™ MRSA medium with a new intended use for the qualitative detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in skin and skin structure infections (SSSI).
C. Measurand:
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
D. Type of Test:
Detection of MRSA using a selective and differential chromogenic medium
E. Applicant:
bioMérieux, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
chromID™ MRSA
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 866.1700
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
JSO: Culture media, Antimicrobial susceptibility test, excluding Mueller Hinton Agar
4. Panel:
{1}
Microbiology (83)
## H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
chromID™ MRSA agar is a selective and differential chromogenic medium for:
A. The qualitative detection of nasal colonization of methicillin-resistant *Staphylococcus aureus* (MRSA), to aid in the prevention and control of MRSA in healthcare settings. The test is performed on anterior nares swab specimens from patients and healthcare workers to screen for MRSA colonization. chromID™ MRSA when used to detect nasal colonization is not intended to diagnose, guide, or monitor therapy for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin.
B. The qualitative detection of MRSA from skin and skin structure infections. chromID™ MRSA is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory tests and clinical data available to aid in the identification and diagnosis of MRSA infections. Concomitant cultures for skin and skin structure infections are necessary to recover organisms for further microbiological susceptibility testing or epidemiological typing.
A negative result does not preclude MRSA infection. chromID™ MRSA is not intended to monitor treatment for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as the Intended Use.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
Prescription use
The following compounds demonstrated an inhibitory effect on the recovery of MRSA on chromID MRSA agar and on control plates: Bacicoline, Maxidrol, Mercryl, Germ Guard, Mupiderm, Hydrocortisone, Betadine, 70% isopropyl alcohol.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Not Applicable
## I. Device Description:
chromID MRSA is a selective medium for the detection of methicillin resistant *Staphylococcus aureus* (MRSA). The selectivity of this medium is based on the presence of antibiotics that inhibit most bacteria not belonging to the genus *Staphylococcus* and yeasts. The medium favors the growth of MRSA including hetero-resistant strains, which will
{2}
appear as green colonies on the agar medium. Colorless colonies growing on the agar are considered negative for MRSA.
# J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Bio-Rad MRSASelect™
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K100589
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | chromID MRSA(K151688) | Bio-Rad MRSASelect(K100589) |
| Intended Use | chromID™ MRSA agar is a selective and differential chromogenic medium for: A. The qualitative detection of nasal colonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), to aid in the prevention and control of MRSA in healthcare settings. The test is performed on anterior nares swab specimens from patients and healthcare workers to screen for MRSA colonization. chromID™ MRSA when used to detect nasal colonization is not intended to diagnose, guide, or monitor therapy for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin. B. The qualitative detection of MRSA from skin and skin structure infections. chromID™ MRSA is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory tests and clinical data available to aid in the identification and diagnosis of MRSA infections. Concomitant cultures for skin and skin structure infections are necessary to recover organisms for further microbiological susceptibility testing or epidemiological typing. | MRSASelect™ is a selective and differential chromogenic medium for the qualitative detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from skin and soft-tissue wound specimens. The medium is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory tests and clinical data available to aid in the identification and diagnosis of MRSA from patients with skin and soft-tissue infections. Concomitant cultures and susceptibility testing are necessary for all skin and soft-tissue wound specimens. MRSASelect™ is not intended to guide, or monitor treatment for MRSA infection, or provides results of susceptibility to methicillin. Results can be interpreted after 18 to 28 hours incubation. |
{3}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | chromID MRSA (K151688) | Bio-Rad MRSASelect (K100589) |
| | A negative result does not preclude MRSA infection. chromID™ MRSA is not intended to monitor treatment for MRSA infections, or provide results of susceptibility to methicillin. | |
| Reporting | MRSA | MRSA |
| Reading | Manual | Manual |
| Inoculation | Direct Specimen | Direct Specimen |
| Specimen Type | SSSI | SSSI |
| Test Methodology | selective chromogenic agar | selective chromogenic agar |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | chromID MRSA (K151688) | Bio-Rad MRSASelect (K100589) |
| Growth Detection | Green colonies after 24 hours incubation | Pink colonies after 18 to 28 hours incubation |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100-S23. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-third Informational, Supplement, Vol. 33 No. 1, January 2013.
# L. Test Principle:
chromID MRSA is a selective medium for the detection and direct identification of MRSA. The selectivity of this medium is based on the presence of an antibiotic mixture that inhibits most bacteria not belonging to the genus Staphylococcus, as well as yeasts. Identification is based on the cleavage of a chromogenic substrate in the medium by Staphylococcus aureus, leading to a green coloration of the growing Staphylococcus aureus colonies. Skin and skin structure infection specimens are inoculated directly onto the chromID MRSA agar plates and incubated aerobically at $35^{\circ} - 37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 24 hours. The cultures are examined after 24 hours incubation for the presence of green colonies, in which the presence of at least one green colony gives the sample a positive MRSA status. Any color of green should be interpreted as a positive result. No growth or colonies presenting as other than green in appearance should be interpreted as a negative result.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
{4}
Reproducibility was demonstrated at three sites using a blinded panel of ten well-characterized Staphylococcus aureus isolates, including both mecA positive and mecA negative isolates. At each site, panel members were tested in triplicate at 1×10³ CFU/ml with multiple lots of chromID MRSA each day for five days. chromID MRSA plates were observed for the growth of green colonies at 24 hours. All strains produced the expected results with the chromID MRSA at 24 hours (450/450). Isolates were also plated to BAP to ensure viability and purity of cultures.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not Applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Quality control (QC) testing was performed at each testing site for growth/color development on chromID MRSA. Two quality control organisms (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300) were tested at each study site on chromID MRSA for each day of testing. The strains were also subcultured to Trypticase Soy Agar w/ 5% sheep blood to ensure viability of the organism. A single colony was touched with a sterile loop and then inoculated onto chromID MRSA agar according to the package insert instructions. QC testing results provided expected reactions at each of the four testing sites on each day tested, except on two days (Table 1). Two days Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 grew, but colonies were not green. The submitted QC data are acceptable.
Table 1. QC Data Summary
| QC Strain | mecA PCR | Expected Results after 24 hrs at 35-37°C | QC Results (all sites) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 | NEG | No growth | 265/267 |
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300 | POS | Growth-green colonies | 267/267 |
d. Detection limit:
Recovery Study
A Recovery Study was performed with two well-characterized MRSA strains at six serial dilutions per strain on five chromID MRSA plates. The minimum concentration of MRSA reliably detected by chromID MRSA at 24 hours was 10⁵ CFU/ml for CDC Mu3-8R and 10³ CFU/ml for ATCC 43300.
Analytical Reactivity
A study was conducted to demonstrate the sensitivity of chromID MRSA agar to detect various MRSA strains at a concentration of 10³ CFU/ml. The study included 80 well-characterized MRSA mecA strains and 5 mecC strains from bioMérieux stock,
{5}
ATCC, and other commercial sources.
Results demonstrated that 58 of 80 mecA MRSA strains and 4/5 mecC MRSA strains were detected on chromID MRSA plates at 24 hours. Two MRSA strains, bioMérieux strain #9204050 and ATCC strain 43866, did not grow on chromID MRSA plates. Table 2 below shows results from the Analytical Reactivity Study.
Table 2. Analytical Reactivity Study Results at 24 and 48 hrs.
| Strains | Number | 24 hr Results | | 48 hr Results | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Growth with Green Color | % Detected | Growth with Green Color | % Detected |
| MRSA (mecA) | 80 | 58/80 | 72.5% | 78/80 | 97.5% |
| MRSA (mecC) | 5 | 4/5 | 80.0% | 5/5 | 100% |
## Expression of Resistance
An Expression of Resistance Study was conducted to demonstrate chromID MRSA performance with 28 well-characterized strains [10 low level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 10 high level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 5 border-line oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA), and 3 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)] at multiple organism concentrations. Eight non-MRSA strains (5 BORSA and 3 MSSA) did not grow on chromID MRSA at the four tested concentrations. No false positives were observed. At 24 hours, all MRSA strains were detected at $10^{5}$ CFU/ml. Table 3 lists results of the Expression of Resistance Study for MRSA strains at 24 hours and 48 hours.
Table 3. MRSA strains detected at various concentrations (Green Colonies).
| Concentration (CFU/ml) | 24 hrs | 48 hrs |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 10^{8} | 20/20 | 20/20 |
| 10^{5} | 20/20 | 20/20 |
| 10^{4} | 17/20 (85%) | 20/20 |
| 10^{3} | 14/20 (70%) | 20/20 |
## Incubation Study
An Incubation Study was performed to determine the effect of various incubation times on the performance of the chromID MRSA media when tested with three MRSA strains (ATCC 43300, Staphylococcus aureus 0611169, and CDC Mu3-8R) at $10^{3}$ CFU/ml concentration. Two MRSA strains (ATCC 43300 and Staphylococcus aureus 0611169) were detected at 20 hours. Twenty-seven hours was needed for a positive identification (green colonies) for all three MRSA strains.
## e. Analytical specificity:
## Cross-Reactivity Study
{6}
In order to evaluate the performance of chromID MRSA agar against microorganisms potentially encountered in skin and skin structure infections, a Cross-Reactivity Study was performed with 71 non-MRSA strains (gram negative bacteria, gram positive bacteria, and yeast) at approximately $10^{6}$ CFU/ml. Results showed that 44 organisms from the cross-reactivity panel did not grow on chromID MRSA.
Please see Table 4 below for a list of strains yielding green colonies on chromID MRSA after 24 hours.
Table 4. Cross-Reactivity Study Results
| Incubation Time | Total Strains Tested | # Strains Growing on chromID MRSA | Strains with Green Colonies | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | # Strains | Organism Name |
| 24 hrs | 71 | 27/71 | 7 | • (3)Klebsiella pneumonia (KPC) • (1) Enterobacter cloacae (KPC) • (1) Staphylococcus pseudointermedius (oxacillin resistant) • (2) Staphylococcus sciuri (oxacillin resistant) |
# Interference Study
Eight strains of Staphylococcus [4 MRSA, 2 methicillin resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus species (MRCNS) and 2 methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)] were used in an Interference Study. Interfering substances were evaluated at physiologically or biologically relevant concentrations and mixed with bacterial suspensions (9:1, v:v). Benzocaine (14 g/l) may delay the colony coloration or inhibit growth of MRSA on chromID MRSA. MRSA colony color and growth were not significantly affected by sodium citrate, citrate phosphate dextrose, plasma, whole blood, and buffy coat.
Swab transport media was tested, and the data was provided in K091024 for the chromID MRSA 510(k) claim for nasal specimens. Transport media tested included: Amies Gel Medium, Liquid Amies Medium, Stuart Gel Medium, Liquid Stuart Medium, and Cary-Blair Transport Media.
# Mixed Infection Study
A Mixed Infection Study was conducted to demonstrate that high levels $(10^{4}, 10^{6}$ or $10^{8}$ CFU/ml) of non-target organism will not suppress growth of MRSA. Ten MRSA strains exhibiting different levels of methicillin-resistance were included in the study and incubated with three non-target organisms (MSSA, MRCN Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Escherichia coli). MRSA strains were tested at approximately $10^{3}$ CFU/ml. At 24 hours, all five low level resistant MRSA strains were detected in the Mixed Infection Study; however, this number varied from 2/5 up to 4/5 strains for the high-level resistant MRSA strains at 24 hours. Two of the MRSA strains not producing green colonies at 24 hours also did not produce green colonies during the Analytical Reactivity Study at 24 hours. Results of the study revealed that MRSA was still detected on chromID MRSA in the presence of high levels of MSSA, S. epidermidis, or E. coli and that non-target organisms did not suppress growth of the ten MRSA strains tested on chromID MRSA. Please refer to Table 5 for results of
{7}
the 24 hour and 48 hour Mixed Infection Study.
Table 5. Summary of Mixed Infection Study at 24 hrs and 48 hrs
| MRSA Concentration (CFU/ml) | Non-Target Organism Concentration (CFU/ml) | Growth (24 hrs) | Characteristic Green Colonies (24 hrs) | Growth (48 hrs) | Characteristic Green Colonies (48 hrs) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5 MRSA strains (low level resistance) + MSSA ATCC 29213 | | | | | |
| 103CFU/ml MRSA | 108CFU/ml MSSA | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | 106CFU/ml MSSA | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | 104CFU/ml MSSA | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| 5 MRSA strains (low level resistance) + S. epidermidis 8402199 | | | | | |
| 103CFU/ml MRSA | 108CFU/ml S. epidermidis | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | 106CFU/ml S. epidermidis | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | 104CFU/ml S. epidermidis | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| 5 MRSA strains (low level resistance) + E. coli ATCC 8739 | | | | | |
| 103CFU/ml MRSA | 108CFU/ml E. coli | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | 106CFU/ml E. coli | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | 104CFU/ml E. coli | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| 5 MRSA strains (high level resistance) + MSSA ATCC 29213 | | | | | |
| 103CFU/ml MRSA | 108CFU/ml MSSA | 5/5 | 2/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | 106CFU/ml MSSA | 5/5 | 2/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | 104CFU/ml MSSA | 5/5 | 3/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| 5 MRSA strains (high level resistance) + S. epidermidis 8402199 | | | | | |
| 103CFU/ml MRSA | 108CFU/ml S. epidermidis | 5/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | 106CFU/ml S. epidermidis | 5/5 | 3/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | 104CFU/ml S. epidermidis | 5/5 | 2/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| 5 MRSA strains (high level resistance) + E. coli ATCC 8739 | | | | | |
| 103CFU/ml MRSA | 108CFU/ml E. coli | 5/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | 106CFU/ml E. coli | 5/5 | 3/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | 104CFU/ml E. coli | 5/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
f. Assay cut-off:
Not Applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Not Applicable. Compared to Standard Reference Method
b. Matrix comparison:
Not Applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
chromID MRSA culture media was evaluated at four clinical sites, which included
{8}
690 SSSI specimens. Three specimens were excluded because they did not meet specimen acceptance criteria. Seven specimens were removed due to protocol deviations. A total of 680 compliant SSSI specimens were included in the performance calculations for chromID MRSA.
All samples were inoculated onto the following media:
- chromID MRSA
- Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) with 6.5% NaCl
For the enrichment culture method, specimens inoculated into TSB with 6.5% NaCl were incubated at 35°C for 24 hours in ambient air. Positive broth cultures were subcultured to Tryptic Soy Agar with 5% sheep blood, while negative broth cultures were incubated for an additional 24 hours before calling negative. Suspected Staphylococcus aureus colonies from plates were identified by Gram stain, catalase, latex agglutination, and cefoxitin screen test (30 µg disk).
chromID MRSA plates were incubated at 35°C for 24 hours in ambient air. Green colonies detected on chromID MRSA plates after 24 hours of incubation indicated the presence of MRSA. Performance (sensitivity and specificity) of chromID MRSA compared to the enriched culture method is presented in Table 6 below.
Table 6. Comparison between chromID MRSA and Enrichment Culture
| | Enriched Culture Method | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| chromID MRSA (24 hr result) | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 166 | 13^{a} | 179 |
| Negative | 11^{b} | 490 | 501 |
| Total | 177 | 503 | 680 |
| | Sensitivity: 93.8%, 95%CI: 89.2%-96.5%
Specificity: 97.4%, 95%CI: 95.6%-98.5% | | |
a 13 discordant specimens (chromID MRSA result of MRSA positive; culture-based testing result of MRSA negative) were observed. 5 of the 13 chromID MRSA positive specimens were confirmed as MRSA by cefoxitin screen test. 8 specimens grew green colonies on chromID MRSA that were not MRSA.
b 11 discordant specimens (chromID MRSA result of MRSA negative; culture-based testing result of MRSA positive) were observed. Six specimens displayed no growth on chromID MRSA. Four specimens grew non-green MRSA colonies on chromID MRSA. One specimen grew green colonies on chromID MRSA that was not identified as MRSA. Six of 10 specimens that were negative for MRSA after 24 hours of incubation on chromID™ MRSA grew colonies indicative of MRSA at 48 hours.
b. Clinical specificity:
See above
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
{9}
Not Applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not Applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The overall prevalence of MRSA by the Enrichment Culture Method was 26.0% (177/680). The prevalence reported for chromID MRSA at 24 hours was 26.3% (179/680).
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
10
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.