Retrospective clinical samples were used to validate clinical sensitivity and specificity for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) and to assess cross-reactivity against other autoimmune and infectious disease conditions.
Clinical validation study; Retrospective cohort study
487 characterized samples including patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy (IIM) and various control groups (Systemic Sclerosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, SLE, Septicaemia, Mixed Connective Tissue Disease, Sjögren's syndrome); Sample Size: 487
Not applicable for this study
Clinical sensitivity and specificity for IIM
Indications for Use
QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 is a chemiluminescent immunoassay for the semi-quantitative determination of IgG anti-Jo-1 antibodies in human serum. The presence of anti-Jo-1 antibodies, in conjunction with clinical findings and other laboratory tests, is an aid in the diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Calibrators are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Reagents for the determination of IgG anti-Jo-1 antibodies in human serum. Each calibrator establishes a point of reference for the working curve that is used to calculate unit values. QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Controls are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Reagents for quality control in the determination of IgG anti-Jo-1 antibodies in human serum.
Device Story
The QUANTA Flash Jo-1 is a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) designed for use on the automated BIO-FLASH instrument. It detects IgG anti-Jo-1 antibodies in human serum. Recombinant Jo-1 antigen is coated onto paramagnetic beads. Patient serum is diluted and incubated with the beads; after washing, isoluminol-conjugated anti-human IgG is added. Trigger solutions (Fe(II)coproporphyrin/NaOH and urea-hydrogen peroxide/NaCl) are added to initiate a flash of light, measured as Relative Light Units (RLU). The BIO-FLASH system processes samples, performs the assay, and calculates results using a lot-specific Master Curve and two-point calibration. Results are reported in chemiluminescent units (CU). The device is intended for clinical laboratory use to aid in the diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical validation included 487 samples (206 IIM patients, 281 autoimmune disease controls). Sensitivity was 11.7% (95% CI: 8.0-16.7%) and specificity was 99.3% (95% CI: 97.4-99.8%). Expected values in 400 healthy donors showed 0% positivity. Method comparison with predicate (N=105 within reportable range) showed 87.6% overall agreement (borderline as negative).
Technological Characteristics
Solid-phase chemiluminescent immunoassay using recombinant Jo-1 antigen coated on paramagnetic microparticles. Detection via isoluminol-conjugated anti-human IgG. Energy source: BIO-FLASH instrument optical system (luminometer). Connectivity: Barcode-based reagent cartridge input. Storage: 2-8°C. Software: Automated system for liquid handling, incubation, and signal processing.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the semi-quantitative determination of IgG anti-Jo-1 antibodies in human serum as an aid in the diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) in patients presenting with clinical symptoms.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An antinuclear antibody immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the autoimmune antibodies in serum, other body fluids, and tissues that react with cellular nuclear constituents (molecules present in the nucleus of a cell, such as ribonucleic acid, deoxyribonucleic acid, or nuclear proteins). The measurements aid in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (a multisystem autoimmune disease in which antibodies attack the victim's own tissues), hepatitis (a liver disease), rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome (arthritis with inflammation of the eye, eyelid, and salivary glands), and systemic sclerosis (chronic hardening and shrinking of many body tissues).
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION MEMORANDUM
A. 510(k) Number:
K151429
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Anti-Jo-1 IgG autoantibodies
D. Type of Test:
Semi-quantitative chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA)
E. Applicant:
INOVA Diagnostics, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
QUANTA Flash® Jo-1
QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Calibrators
QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Controls
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR §866.5100, Antinuclear Antibodies Immunological Test System
21 CFR §862.1150, Calibrator
21 CFR §862.1660, Quality Control Material (Assayed and Unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II, Assay and Calibrators
Class I, Control
3. Product code:
LLL – Extractable antinuclear antibody, antigen and control
JIT – Calibrator, Secondary
{1}
JJX – Single (Specified) Analyte Controls (Assayed and Unassayed)
4. Panel:
Immunology (82) (Assay)
Clinical Chemistry (75) (Calibrators and Controls)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 is a chemiluminescent immunoassay for the semi-quantitative determination of IgG anti-Jo-1 antibodies in human serum. The presence of anti-Jo-1 antibodies, in conjunction with clinical findings and other laboratory tests, is an aid in the diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.
QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Calibrators are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Reagents for the determination of IgG anti-Jo-1 antibodies in human serum. Each calibrator establishes a point of reference for the working curve that is used to calculate unit values.
QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Controls are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Reagents for quality control in the determination of IgG anti-Jo-1 antibodies in human serum.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as Intended Use
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For Prescription Use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
BIO-FLASH® chemiluminescent analyzer (k083518)
I. Device Description:
The QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Kit includes one QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Reagent Cartridge with the following reagents for 50 determinations:
a. Jo-1 antigen coated paramagnetic beads, lyophilized
b. Assay Buffer
c. Tracer IgG – Isoluminol labeled anti-human IgG antibodies in buffer
{2}
The QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Calibrators set is sold separately and contains:
a. Calibrator 1: Two barcode labeled tubes containing 0.3 mL prediluted, ready to use reagent. Calibrator 1 contains human antibodies to Jo-1 in buffer with concentration of 19 CU.
b. Calibrator 2: Two barcode labeled tubes containing 0.3 mL prediluted, ready to use reagent. Calibrator 2 contains human antibodies to Jo-1 in buffer with concentration of 320 CU.
The QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Controls set contains is sold separately and contains:
a. Negative Control: Two barcode labeled tubes containing 0.5 mL, ready to use reagent. Negative control contains human antibodies to Jo-1 in buffer with concentration of 10 CU.
b. Positive Control: Two barcode labeled tubes containing 0.5 mL, ready to use reagent. Positive control contains human antibodies to Jo-1 in buffer with concentration of 50 CU.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
FIDIS Connective 10
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K102607
2. Comparison with predicate:
QUANTA Flash® Jo-1Reagent Kit:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 | Predicate FIDIS Connective 10 |
| Intended Use | Semi-quantitative determination of anti-Jo-1 antibodies in human serum. | Same |
| Antigen | Recombinant Jo-1 | Same |
| Sample Type | Serum | Same |
| Assay methodology | Solid phase immunoassay | Same |
| Traceability | International Reference preparation is not available. Results are traceable to in-house standards | Same |
| Shelf Life | One year at 2–8°C | Same |
{3}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 | Predicate FIDIS Connective 10 |
| Detection | Chemiluminescent immunoassay | Multiplex bead-based flow cytometric fluorescent immunoassay |
| Solid Phase | Paramagnetic microparticles (beads) | Color-coded microspheres |
| Conjugate | Isoluminol conjugated anti-human IgG | Phycoerythrin conjugated anti-human IgG |
| Calibration | Lot specific Master Curve and two Calibrators (Sold separately) | Calibration system interpolates fluorescent intensity (included in the kit |
| Cut-off | Negative: <20 CU Positive: ≥20 CU | Negative: <30 AU/mL Borderline: 31-40 AU/mL Positive: >40 AU/mL |
| Assay Measuring Range (AMR) | 2.2-1147.2 CU | No claim for the reportable range |
QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Calibrators:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Calibrators | Predicate |
| Analyte | Anti-Jo-1 antibodies | Same |
| Matrix | Human serum, buffers, stabilizers and preservative | Same |
| Physico-chemical characteristics | Liquid, prediluted, ready to use | Same |
| Shelf Life/Storage | One year at 2–8°C | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Calibrators | Predicate |
| Intended Use | For use with QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 reagents for determination of IgG anti-Jo-1 antibodies in human serum. Each calibrator establishes a point of reference for the working curve that is used to calculate unit values. | No separate intended use; calibrator is part of the kit. |
| Unit | CU (Chemiluminescent Units) | AU/mL (arbitrary)s |
{4}
QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Controls:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device
QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Controls | Predicate |
| Analyte | Anti-Jo-1 antibodies | Same |
| Matrix | Human serum, buffer, stabilizer, and preservative | Same |
| Physico-chemical characteristics | Liquid, ready to use | Liquid, to be diluted |
| Levels | 2 (negative and positive) | Same |
| Shelf Life/Storage | One year at 2–8°C | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device
QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Controls | Predicate |
| Intended Use | For use with the QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 reagents for quality control in the determination of IgG anti-Jo-1 autoantibodies in human serum. | No separate intended use; controls are part of the kit. |
| Unit | CU (arbitrary) | AU/mL (arbitrary) |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
EP05-A2, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline, Second Edition.
EP06-A, Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement, Approved Guideline, Second Edition.
EP07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry, Approved Guideline, Second Edition
EP09-A2-IR, Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline, Second Edition (Interim Revision).
EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline, Second Edition
C28-A3, Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline, Third Addition
L. Test Principle:
The QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 assay is a microparticle chemiluminescent immunoassay designed for use on the BIO-FLASH® instrument. The instrument platform is a fully automated closed system with continuous load and random access capabilities that automatically processes the samples, runs the assay and reports the results. It includes liquid handling hardware, luminometer and computer with software-user interface. The QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 assay utilizes a reagent cartridge format, which is compatible with the BIO-FLASH® instrument.
{5}
Purified recombinant Jo-1 antigen is coated onto paramagnetic beads. The bead suspension is lyophilized and stored in the bead tube. Prior to use in the BIO-FLASH® system, the sealed reagent tubes are pierced with the reagent cartridge lid and the beads are rehydrated and resuspended using resuspension buffer by pipetting up and down with a transfer pipette. The reagent cartridge is then loaded onto the BIO-FLASH® instrument. Samples are also loaded onto the instrument in sample racks. A patient serum sample is prediluted by the BIO-FLASH® with system rinse in a small disposable plastic cuvette. Small amounts of the diluted patient serum, the beads, and assay buffer are all combined into a second cuvette, and mixed. This cuvette is then incubated at 37°C. The beads are magnetized and washed several times. Isoluminol conjugated anti-human IgG antibodies are then added to the cuvette, and again incubated at 37°C. The beads are magnetized and washed repeatedly. The isoluminol conjugate is oxidized when Trigger 1 and Trigger 2 are added to the cuvette, and the flash of light produced from this reaction is measured as Relative Light Units (RLU) by the BIO-FLASH® optical system. The RLU are proportional to the amount of isoluminol conjugate that is bound to the human IgG, which is in turn proportional to the amount of anti-Jo-1 antibodies bound to the corresponding Jo-1 on the beads.
For determining the amount of antibody in a sample, the QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 assay utilizes a predefined lot specific Master Curve that is uploaded onto the instrument through the reagent cartridge barcode. Every new lot number of reagent cartridge must be calibrated before first use, with the QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Calibrators. Based on the results obtained with the two Calibrators included in the Calibrator Set, an instrument specific Working Curve is created, which is used to calculate chemiluminescent units (CU) from the instrument signal (RLU) obtained for each sample.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
**Precision**: The precision of the QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 assay was evaluated by testing nine serum samples prepared to contain various concentrations of anti-Jo-1 antibody. Each sample was run in duplicate, twice a day, for 20 days with one reagent lot (total of 80 replicates per sample). All %CV values were within the manufacturer's pre-determined acceptance limit (< 10%). The results are summarized in the table below.
| Sample | Mean (CU) | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 1 | 5.5 | 0.2 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 0.4 | 6.8 | 0.4 | 7.6 |
| 2 | 19.5 | 0.6 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 6.2 |
| 3 | 20.7 | 0.8 | 3.7 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 5.9 | 1.5 | 7.1 |
| 4 | 37.1 | 1.6 | 4.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 6.1 | 2.8 | 7.6 |
{6}
| Sample | Mean (CU) | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 5 | 42.0 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 5.6 | 2.8 | 6.7 |
| 6 | 97.5 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 7.1 | 7.3 |
| 7 | 288.2 | 10.0 | 3.5 | 8.5 | 3.0 | 19.1 | 6.6 | 23.2 | 8.0 |
| 8 | 445.6 | 18.7 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 29.4 | 6.6 | 34.8 | 7.8 |
| 9 | 879.3 | 43.6 | 5.0 | 13.2 | 1.5 | 43.8 | 5.0 | 63.2 | 7.2 |
Reproducibility: A total of five samples were tested at three different sites with one reagent lot to evaluate the site-to-site reproducibility. Each sample was run in replicates of five, once a day for five days, to generate 25 data points at each site (N=75 per sample for all sites combined). Data were analyzed for within-run, between-run, between-site, and total precision. The results are summarized in the tables below. All %CV values were within the manufacturer's pre-determined acceptance limit (< 15%).
| Sample | Mean (CU) | Within-Day | | Between-Day | | Between-Site | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 1 | 9.8 | 0.5 | 4.7 | 0.5 | 4.6 | 0.8 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 10.4 |
| 2 | 32.4 | 1.0 | 3.1 | 1.9 | 5.9 | 2.3 | 7.0 | 3.1 | 9.6 |
| 3 | 77.3 | 3.1 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 6.4 | 8.3 | 7.8 | 10.1 |
| 4 | 168.3 | 6.6 | 3.9 | 8.1 | 4.8 | 14.7 | 8.8 | 18.0 | 10.7 |
| 5 | 854.6 | 34.4 | 4.0 | 29.7 | 4.0 | 0.4 | 6.8 | 100.0 | 11.7 |
To evaluate lot-to-lot reproducibility, five samples with anti-Jo-1 antibody concentration at various levels across the measuring range (18.6, 23.3, 73.3, 382.5, and 911.9 CU) were tested. Each sample was tested in replicates of five, one run per day for five days using three difference reagent lots. Mean and %CV for each sample were calculated and %CV values were from 3.6% to 7.9% for all samples.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity: The analytical measuring range (AMR) of the assay is defined by the lowest and highest points on the master curve, e.g., 2.2-1147.2 CU. The linearity across this range was evaluated by a study according to CLSI EP6-A. Serially diluted samples with anti-Jo-1 antibody concentrations ranging from 1.7 to 1226.6 CU were prepared by diluting each of four high positive serum samples with analyte free (stripped) serum in 10% increments. Each dilution was tested in duplicate. Percentage recovery of obtained mean results was calculated compared to the expected results with the acceptant criteria of recovery between 80 and 120%, or ± 4 CU, whichever is greater. The linear regression analysis was performed using the samples falling within the master curve and the results of samples within AMR are
{7}
summarized as follows:
| Sample | Test Range (CU) | Slope (95% CI) | Y-intercept (95% CI) | R² | % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 3.0–14.4 | 0.99 (0.96–1.02) | 0.22 (-0.09–0.52) | 1.00 | 97.1–107.2% |
| 2 | 4.4–44.3 | 0.99 (0.95–1.02) | 0.27 (-0.77–1.32) | 0.99 | 90.4–113.0% |
| 3 | 11.0–110.5 | 0.99 (0.98–1.01) | -1.12 (-2.08– -0.16) | 1.00 | 90.5–100.5% |
| 4 | 68.7–686.8 | 1.00 (0.95–1.04) | -11.28 (-29.25–6.68 ) | 0.99 | 85.7–106.6% |
| 5 | 125.2–1126.4 | 0.92 (0.89–0.96) | 31.38 (8.50–54.26) | 1.00 | 95.0–111.5% |
Auto-rerun: To validate the auto-rerun function with 1:20 dilutions, two high positive specimens with anti-Jo-1 antibody concentrations above assay measuring range (8967.5 and 19914.0 CU) were run with the auto-rerun function enabled on the BIO-FLASH®. The same set of samples prepared manually with a 1:20 fold dilution was used as reference and tested with the concentration of 9815.2 and 19343.6 CU, respectively. The % recovery values for results obtained with the auto-rerun results compared to results obtained with the manual dilution were 91% and 103%, respectively.
Hook effect: Two high positive samples having anti-Jo-1 antibody concentration above assay measuring range (31783.1 CU and 65625.5 CU) were examined to assess potential hook effect. No hook effect was observed up to 65625.5 CU.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability: There is no recognized standard or reference material for anti-Jo-1 autoantibodies. The calibrator and control values are directly traceable to in-house standards that are used to create the master curves for the QUANTA Flash® Jo-1.
Value assignment: The QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Calibrators and Controls are manufactured by diluting human serum that contains high titer of anti-Jo-1 antibodies. The target CU is achieved through trial dilutions on small scale. Once a dilution is selected, the Calibrators and Controls are bulked, tested, and adjusted. Upon completion of the manufacturing process, the Calibrators and Controls are tested on at least two instruments, on at least two lots of reagent cartridge, in replicates of 10 to determine final value assignment. The target values and ranges for the Calibrators and Controls are listed below:
{8}
9
| | Target Value (CU) | Target Range (CU) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Calibrators | | |
| Calibrator 1 | 19 | 17–21 |
| Calibrator 2 | 320 | 280–360 |
| QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Controls | | |
| Negative control | 10 | 8–12 |
| Positive control | 50 | 40–60 |
**Stability:**
**Kit stability (unopened):** The accelerated stability study was performed using three lots of Jo-1 coupled beads, calibrators, and controls. Real-time stability is on-going; the results to date support a claim of 12 months stability for unopened reagent cartridge, up to 15 months on calibrators, and up to 16 months on controls stored at 2–8°C.
**On-board (In-use) stability:** On-board stability study was performed for calibrators, controls and reagent cartridge:
i. Calibrators: Calibrators were placed uncapped, onboard the instrument, and calibration was performed five times over 9.5 hours. Controls and a panel of characterized patient specimens were run on each calibration curve. Each calibrator is measured in triplicate during calibration.
ii. Controls: Two vials of each control were assayed twice a day for a total of 21 runs. The first run was used to establish baseline value, and then an additional 19 runs were performed. During runs, the Controls were left uncapped, onboard the instrument for 15 minutes per run. When not in use, the controls were capped, and stored at 5°C ± 3°C.
iii. Reagent Cartridge: Two lots of cartridges were tested with four serum specimens (with different reactivity levels) along with the Negative and Positive Controls. The specimens were tested periodically up to 92 days. Percent recoveries were calculated compared to the day zero average values, and linear regression analysis was performed by plotting % recovery against the number of days.
All results met the manufacturer’s acceptance criteria and support the following on-board stability claim:
| Calibrators | 8 hours on-board; up to 4 calibrations |
| --- | --- |
| Controls | Up to 15 uses with 10 min on-board per use |
| Reagent Cartridge | 71 days on-board |
**Sample stability:** The study was performed with seven samples (two negatives, three positives, and two around the cut-off), tested at 2–8°C, and room temperature (RT). In addition, the samples were tested for the stability after up to three repeated
{9}
freeze/thaw cycles. The results support sample stability up to 48 hours of storage at RT, up to 14 days of storage at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ , and up to three freeze/thaw cycles when samples are stored at or below $-20^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ .
# d. Detection limit:
Limit of Blank (LoB) was determined by assaying four blank samples in five replicates per sample over three days with two reagent lots. Sixty data points were generated. LoB was calculated at the 95th percentile using the non-parametric method, as the dataset showed non-normal distribution. The LoB was determined to be 337 RLU.
The Limit of Detection (LoD) was determined by assaying four samples with anti-Jo-1 antibody concentration between LoB and approximately four times of LoB. Each sample was tested in five replicates over three days with two reagent lots. LoD value was calculated as the $\mathrm{LoB} + 1.645 \times \mathrm{SD}$ of the replicates for the low level samples. The LoD of the QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 assay was determined to be 409 RLU, which is below the value of the lowest QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 Master Curve standard (2.2 CU), and therefore below the AMR of the assay.
# e. Analytical specificity:
Endogenous Interference: Three serum samples with antibody concentrations at 11.3 CU (negative), 21.1 CU (around the cut-off), and 117.0 CU (positive) were spiked with known quantities of bilirubin (10, 5.0, or $2.5\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ), hemoglobin (200, 100, or $50\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ), or triglycerides/cholesterol (1000/224.3, 500/112.2, or $250 / 56.1\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ). Each sample was tested in triplicate and the recovery was calculated by comparing to control samples spiked with the same volume of diluents. For rheumatoid factor (RF) interference, three samples with antibody concentrations at 7.3 CU (negative), 32.5 CU, and 123 CU were tested by spiking with different proportions of a high positive RF IgM serum sample (1894 IU/mL). Each sample was tested triplicate and the recovery was calculated by comparing to control samples spiked with the same proportions of a negative serum. No interference ( $85\% - 115\%$ recovery for samples above the cutoff, and $\pm 4$ CU difference for samples below the cutoff) was detected in the samples up to the concentrations listed in the table below:
| Potential Interfering Substances | Maximum Concentration |
| --- | --- |
| Bilirubin | 10 mg/dL |
| Hemoglobin | 200 mg/dL |
| Triglycerides | 1000 mg/dL |
| Cholesterol | 224.3 mg/dL |
| RF | 947 IU/mL |
Analytical cross-reactivity: Cross reactivity of the QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 was investigated using 12 reference sera from the Center of Disease Control and
{10}
Prevention (CDC) with three lots of QUANTA Flash Jo-1 reagents. The ANA human reference serum #10 (for human antibodies to Jo-1) tested positive on all three lots with an average of 935.9 CU. The other reference sera in the panel were below 2.2 CU for all three lots tested.
f. Assay cut-off:
The QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 cut-off was determined by testing a set of samples from a reference population of 207 subjects (31 systemic sclerosis samples, 30 systemic lupus erythematosus samples, 21 Crohn's disease samples, 19 multiple sclerosis, 19 hepatitis C positive samples, 18 ulcerative colitis samples, 13 psoriatic arthritis samples, 10 syphilis positive samples, 10 healthy individuals, 9 polymyalgia rheumatica samples, 8 rheumatoid arthritis samples, 5 spondylarthritis samples, 3 Sjögren's syndrome samples and 11 other disease control samples). The cut-off was established as 20 CU (10000 RLU) based on the 99th percentile of the results obtained.
| | Positive | Negative |
| --- | --- | --- |
| QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 | ≥20 CU | <20 CU |
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Samples for method comparison analysis included 487 samples from the clinical validation study (see below) along with 26 additional samples contrived by diluting Jo-1 positive samples with negative serum to cover the reportable range of assay. These samples were tested on both the QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 and on the predicate FIDIS Connective 10. From the total of 513 samples, results for 105 samples were within the reportable range of the assay. The results are summarized below:
| | FIDIS Connective 10 | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Borderline | Negative | Total |
| QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 | Positive | 20 | 5 | 6 | 31 |
| | Negative | 2 | 2 | 70 | 74 |
| | Total | 22 | 7 | 76 | 105 |
Borderline as negative:
Positive agreement: 90.9% (95% CI: 72.2–97.5%)
Negative agreement: 86.7% (95% CI: 77.8–92.4%)
Overall agreement: 87.6% (95% CI: 80.0–92.6%)
Borderline as positive:
Positive agreement: 86.2% (95% CI: 69.4–94.5%)
Negative agreement: 92.1% (95% CI: 83.8–96.3%)
Overall agreement: 90.5% (95% CI: 83.4–94.7%)
{11}
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity and Clinical Specificity:
A total of 487 samples were included in the clinical validation for the QUANTA Flash® Jo-1. The validation set of samples includes 206 samples from patients diagnosed with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) and 281 samples from patients with other autoimmune diseases. Clinical sensitivity and specificity in this sample cohort are summarized in the following tables:
| | Clinical Diagnosis of IIM | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 | Positive | 24 | 2 | 26 |
| | Negative | 182 | 279 | 461 |
| | Total | 206 | 281 | 487 |
Sensitivity: 11.7% (95% CI: 8.0-16.7%)
Specificity: 99.3% (95% CI: 97.4-99.8%)
The distribution of the cohort and the Jo-1 positivity rate for each clinical subgroup are summarized below:
| Disease category | QUANTA Flash® Jo-1 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | N | # of positive | % Positive |
| Target Diseases (IIM): | | | |
| Dermatomyositis (DM) | 95 | 11 | 11.7% |
| Polymyositis (PM) | 71 | 7 | 9.9% |
| Juvenile Dermatomycotic | 7 | 1 | 14.3% |
| Others (IMNM, OM, UM)* | 5 | 1 | 20.0% |
| IIM not further specified | 28 | 4 | 14.3% |
| Total of IIM | 206 | 24 | 11.7% |
| Control Diseases: | | | |
| Sjögren’s syndrome | 15 | 0 | 0.0% |
| SLE | 41 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Systemic Sclerosis | 44 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | 59 | 1 | 1.7% |
| MCTD | 103 | 1 | 0.9% |
| Septicemia | 19 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total of controls | 281 | 2 | 0.7% |
* IMNM: Immune mediated necrotizing myopathy
OM: overlap myositis
UN: undifferentiated myositis
{12}
b. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The expected value in the normal population is "negative". Anti-Jo-1 antibody levels were analyzed in a cohort of 400 apparently healthy blood donors (246 females and 154 males, ages 17 to 60 years, with an average age of 34.7 years and median age of 34 years) using the QUANTA Flash® Jo-1. The results showed a mean concentration of 2.3 CU with the values ranging from < 2.2 to 16.3 CU. None of the samples were positive on the QUANTA Flash® Jo-1.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.