K151172 · Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · MQV · Aug 14, 2015 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K151172
Device Name
MASTERGRAFT Contain
Applicant
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Product Code
MQV · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Aug 14, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3045
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
MASTERGRAFT® Contain is to be combined with autogenous bone marrow and is indicated for bony voids or gaps that are not intrinsic to the stability of the bony structure and can be used as a bone graft extender. The device is to be gently packed into bony voids or gaps of the skeletal system (i.e., the posterolateral spine, pelvis, ilium, and/or extremities). These defects may be surgically created osseous defects or osseous defects created from traumatic injury to the bone. The device resorbs and is replaced with bone during the healing process. When used in the pelvis, illium, or extremittes, the device is to be used with bone marrow aspirate. When used in the posterolateral spine, the device must be mixed with bone marrow aspirate and autograft bone and used as a bone graft extender.
Device Story
MASTERGRAFT® Contain is a sterile, biocompatible, osteoconductive, porous bone void filler; composed of purified bovine Type I collagen and biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic (15% hydroxyapatite, 85% β-tricalcium phosphate). Device features a cavity designed to contain and deliver autologous bone to surgical sites. Intended for use by surgeons in clinical settings to fill surgically created or traumatic osseous defects. Device is packed into voids; absorbs bone marrow aspirate; resorbs over time as it is replaced by new bone. Provides a scaffold for bony ingrowth. Benefits include facilitating bone healing in non-structural defects.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data submitted. Substantial equivalence supported by non-clinical testing and comparison to predicate devices.
Technological Characteristics
Bioresorbable implant; bovine Type I collagen (>95% purity) and biphasic calcium phosphate (15% hydroxyapatite, 85% β-tricalcium phosphate). Complies with ASTM F1185-03 (hydroxyapatite) and ASTM F1088-04a (β-tricalcium phosphate). Biocompatibility validated per ISO 10993 series (genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, systemic toxicity, etc.). Animal tissue sourcing/handling per ISO 22442. Sterile, single-patient use.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with bony voids or gaps in the skeletal system (posterolateral spine, pelvis, ilium, extremities) not intrinsic to structural stability. Used as bone graft extender. Requires combination with autogenous bone marrow aspirate; for posterolateral spine, requires mixture with bone marrow aspirate and autograft bone.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A resorbable calcium salt bone void filler device is a resorbable implant intended to fill bony voids or gaps of the extremities, spine, and pelvis that are caused by trauma or surgery and are not intrinsic to the stability of the bony structure.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance: Resorbable Calcium Salt Bone Void Filler Device; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” See § 888.1(e) of this chapter for the availability of this guidance.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three faces in profile, stacked on top of each other.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Incorporated Mr. Gregory Maschek Senior Regulatory Affairs Manager 1800 Pyramid Place Memphis, Tennessee 38132
August 14, 2015
Re: K151172
Trade/Device Name: Mastergraft® Contain Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3045 Regulation Name: Resorbable calcium salt bone void filler device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MQV Dated: July 8, 2015 Received: July 9, 2015
Dear Mr. Mascheck:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the
{1}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Gregory Maschek
quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Mark N. Melkerson -S
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: January 31, 2017
See PRA Statement below.
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K151172
Device Name MASTERGRAFT® Contain
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
MASTERGRAFT® Contain is to be combined with autogenous bone marrow and is indicated for bony voids or gaps that are not intrinsic to the stability of the bony structure and can be used as a bone graft extender.
The device is to be gently packed into bony voids or gaps of the skeletal system (i.e., the posterolateral spine, pelvis, ilium, and/or extremities). These defects may be surgically created osseous defects or osseous defects created from traumatic injury to the bone. The device resorbs and is replaced with bone during the healing process. When used in the pelvis, illium, or extremittes, the device is to be used with bone marrow aspirate. When used in the posterolateral spine, the device must be mixed with bone marrow aspirate and autograft bone and used as a bone graft extender.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | <table><tr><td><div> <span> </span> <span> Authorization to Use EPA SET-2021 Interim Strategy </span> </div></td></tr><tr><td><div> <span> </span> <span> Other </span> </div></td></tr></table> | <div> <span> </span> <span> Authorization to Use EPA SET-2021 Interim Strategy </span> </div> | <div> <span> </span> <span> Other </span> </div> |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> </span> <span> Authorization to Use EPA SET-2021 Interim Strategy </span> </div> | | | |
| <div> <span> </span> <span> Other </span> </div> | | | |
|X | Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
| I. SUBMITTER NAME & ADDRESSS: | Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| | 1800 Pyramid Place |
| | Memphis, Tennessee 38132 |
| | Telephone: (901) 396-3133 |
| | Fax: (901) 346-9738 |
| | Establishment Registration: 1030489 |
| CONTACT PERSON: | Gregory Maschek |
| | Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist |
| DATE PREPARED: | July 7, 2015 |
## II. PROPOSED PROPRIETARY TRADE NAME: MASTERGRAFT® Contain
| DEVICE CLASSIFICATION NAME: | Resorbable Calcium Salt Bone Void Filler |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| REGULATION NUMBER: | 21 CFR 888.3045 |
| CLASSIFICATION PRODUCT CODE: | MQV |
| CLASS: | II |
## III. IDENTIFICATION OF LEGALLY MARKETED DEVICES:
| Table 1. Legally Marketed Devices | | |
|-----------------------------------|---------------|------------------------------|
| Device name | 510(k) number | Substantial Equivalence date |
| MASTERGRAFT® Strip | K082166 | 06/02/2009 |
| MASTERGRAFT® MATRIX<br>EXT | K130335 | 04/19/2013 |
{4}------------------------------------------------
### IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION:
MASTERGRAFT® Contain is made from a combination of medical grade purified collagen of bovine origin and biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic. In the MASTERGRAFT® Contain device, the collagen is a highly purified (>95%) Type I bioresorbable lyophilized collagen. The biphasic ceramic portion of the device is provided in a 15 percent hydroxyapatite and 85 percent ß- tricalcium phosphate formulation. The device is supplied sterile in a premixed form for single patient use. The device is a biocompatible, osteoconductive, porous implant that allows for bony ingrowth across the graft site while resorbing at a rate consistent with bone healing. The device readily absorbs bone marrow aspirate and has been shown to heal bone defects. The device is designed with a cavity (ies) to contain and deliver autologous bone to the surgical site when used as a bone graft extender.
The purpose of this Traditional 510(k) application is to add MASTERGRAFT® Contain to the MASTERGRAFT® product family. The material composition of MASTERGRAFT® Contain is identical to that of predicate devices MASTERGRAFT® Strip and MASTERGRAFT® Matrix EXT. The intended use (i.e., bone void filler and posterolateral spine bone graft extender) of MASTERGRAFT® Contain are similar to that of predicate devices MASTERGRAFT® Strip and MASTERGRAFT® Matrix EXT. The overall dimensions of the MASTERGRAFT® Contain devices are similar to MASTERGRAFT® Strip and MASTERGRAFT® Matrix EXT, with the addition of a cavity to contain and deliver autogenous bone to the implant site when used as bone graft extender. Compared to the predicate devices, the inclusion of the cavity in the design of MASTERGRAFT® Contain does not present a new worst case for safety or effectiveness of the device for its intended use.
## V. INDICATIONS FOR USE:
MASTERGRAFT® Contain is to be combined with autogenous bone marrow and is indicated for bony voids or gaps that are not intrinsic to the stability of the bony structure and can be used as a bone graft extender.
{5}------------------------------------------------
The device is to be gently packed into bony voids or gaps of the skeletal system (i.e., the posterolateral spine, pelvis, ilium, and/or extremities). These defects may be surgically created osseous defects or osseous defects created from traumatic injury to the bone. The device resorbs and is replaced with bone during the healing process. When used in the pelvis, ilium, or extremities, the device is to be used with bone marrow aspirate. When used in the posterolateral spine, the device must be mixed with bone marrow aspirate and autograft bone and used as a bone graft extender.
| Table 2. Summary of the technological Characteristics | | | |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Comparison Feature | Subject<br>MASTERGRAFT<br>® Contain | Predicate<br>MASTERGRAFT® Strip<br>K082166<br>S.E. 06/02/2009 | Predicate<br>MASTERGRAFT®<br>Matrix EXT<br>K130335 S.E.<br>04/19/2013 |
| Indication for Use | Similar | S.E. 06/02/2009 | S.E. 04/19/2013 |
| Fundamental Scientific<br>Technology<br>• Operating Principle<br>• Mechanism of Action | Identical | S.E. 06/02/2009 | S.E. 04/19/2013 |
| Sizes | Similar | S.E. 06/02/2009 | S.E. 04/19/2013 |
| Performance | Identical | S.E. 06/02/2009 | S.E. 04/19/2013 |
| Sterilization | Identical | S.E. 06/02/2009 | S.E. 04/19/2013 |
| Manufacturing principles | Identical | S.E. 06/02/2009 | S.E. 04/19/2013 |
| Shelf-Life | Identical | S.E. 06/02/2009 | S.E. 04/19/2013 |
| Packaging | Identical | S.E. 06/02/2009 | S.E. 04/19/2013 |
| Material Composition<br>• Collagen<br>• Granules | Identical | S.E. 06/02/2009 | S.E. 04/19/2013 |
| Use of rigid fixation | Identical | S.E. 06/02/2009 | S.E. 04/19/2013 |
| Safety and Effectiveness<br>profile | Identical | S.E. 06/02/2009 | S.E. 04/19/2013 |
| Geometry | Similar | S.E. 06/02/2009 | S.E. 04/19/2013 |
## VI. SUMMARY OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS:
{6}------------------------------------------------
## VII. DISCUSSION OF NON-CLINICAL TESTING:
Non-clinical testing was performed in support of substantial equivalence for the cited predicate K082166 [S.E. 06/02/2009] in accordance with FDA Recognized Consensus Standards and FDA Guidelines, where applicable. No new non-clinical testing was performed or submitted in support of this 510(k).
Previously submitted non-clinical testing was performed in accordance with the following standards:
- · ASTM F1185-03: 2009 Specification for Composition of Ceramic Hydroxyapatite for Surgical Implants
- ASTM F1088-04a: 2010, Specification for ß-tricalcium Phosphate for Surgical . Implantation
- ISO 22442-1: 2007 Animal Tissues and Their Derivatives Utilized in the . Manufacture of Medical Devices -- Part 1 Analysis and Risk Management
- . ISO 22442-2: 2007 Animal Tissues and Their Derivatives Utilized in the Manufacture of Medical Devices -- Part 2 Controls on Sourcing, Collection, and Handling
- ISO 22442-3: 2007 Animal Tissues and Their Derivatives Utilized in the . Manufacture of Medical Devices -- Part 3 Validation of the Elimination and/or Inactivation of Virus and Transmissible Agents
- ISO 10993-3: 2003/(R) 2009, Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 3 . Tests for genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and reproductive toxicity. (Biocompatibility)
- ISO10993-4: 2009, Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 4: Selection . of tests for interactions with blood
- ISO 10993-5: 2009, Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 5: Tests for 0 In Vitro cytotoxicity. (Biocompatibility)
- ISO 10993-6: 2009, Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 6: Tests for ● local effects after implantation. (Biocompatibility)
{7}------------------------------------------------
- ISO 10993-10: 2009, Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 10: Tests for ● irritation and skin sensitization. (Biocompatibility)
- ISO 10993-11: 2009, Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 11: Tests for ● systemic toxicity. (Biocompatibility)
- ISO 10993-12: 2009, Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 12: Sample . preparation and reference materials. (Biocompatibility)
## VIII. CONCLUSION:
Documentation provided in this submission demonstrates that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the previously cleared bone void filler MASTERGRAFT® Strip [K082166 S.E. 06/02/2009] and MASTERGRAFT® Matrix EXT [K130335 S.E. 04/19/2013.]
The subject device is substantially equivalent to predicates MASTERGRAFT® Strip and MASTERGRAFT® Matrix EXT in several categories including: indication, material composition (including biphasic calcium phosphate granules and collagen), sterility, shelf-life, biocompatibility and the ability to resorb during the healing process.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.